Month: April 2026

VivaGym buys Synergym and creates the first Iberian fitness giant

by

VivaGym, the gym chain low cost controlled by the American fund Providence Equity Partners, has closed the purchase of Synergym in what will be, when regulators give the go-ahead, the largest business operation in the history of the fitness Spanish. The resulting group will exceed 450 clubs between Spain and Portugal, will have a turnover of more than 270 million euros and will have close to one million members. according to account The Confidential. It is the biggest move by Cristina Burzako, former director of Movistar+, since she took over in November 2025, and Providence’s fourth purchase in the Iberian market since she landed in VivaGym two years ago. Why is it important. Spain has 1.4 million more gym subscribers than two years ago. The exercise craze is as real as it is recent (on this scale), and has reached the point where the social trend becomes an investment thesis. In figures. The sector’s jump explains why Providence is hitting the accelerator right now: 6.2 million subscribers in Spain at the end of 2024, compared to 4.8 million in 2022. 29% more in two years. The sector invoiced 1,650 million euros in 2025. More than double that before the pandemic, a clear turning point. 3.3% of the Spanish GDP is already represented by sport and fitnesscompared to 1.5%-2% of the European average. The backdrop. The gym fever in Spain is not an intuition, it is a statistical series that we have verified with the five-year CSD surveys on sporting habits. And depending on how you measure it, it tells two stories that point in the same direction. The Ministry’s official survey shows how many Spaniards say they subscribe to a gym, including municipal sports centers and sports clubs. The EuropeActive series, on the other hand, measures only subscriptions to private chains, which are the ones that VivaGym and Synergym dispute. The former has gone from 3% to 30.7% in a quarter of a century. The second has added 1.3 million net members since 2015. The two curves accelerate from 2022. Between the lines. The key phrase was said by Juan del Río, former CEO of VivaGym, a few months ago: “A regional champion should not have less than 500 gyms on the peninsula if he wants to defend himself well.” how to collect Play2book. That figure marks the threshold that VivaGym has just touched. It is the same logic that Mercadona, Dia and Lidl applied two decades ago, or Ryanair and Vueling shortly after: When a business depends on tight margins and volume, size stops being an option and becomes a condition of survival. A chain of 100 gyms does not negotiate the same rents as one of 500. It does not buy equipment at the same prices. You can’t afford the same investment in branding. He low cost It only works if you are big, and you are only big if you buy from someone who is not yet big. Providence does not buy gyms to manage them, it buys them to build a platform large enough to squeeze the landlords, squeeze purchasing centers and, when the time comes, sell to another fund or take it public. It is the same manual with which the oligopolies of the retail food and European aviation low cost. The contrast. The mirror is Basic-Fit, the listed Dutch operator that has more than 1,500 clubs in Europe and has shown that the model scales. It went from 90 to 139 centers in Spain in a single year. They are known for being “the ones with the backpacks”. VivaGym aspires to something similar, backpacks aside, but without leaving the Iberian Peninsula. But there is an important difference: Basic-Fit is a listed company. VivaGym, on the other hand, remains owned by a fund that, sooner or later, will want to exit. Yes, but. The sector has a common flaw: profitability is elusive. Between 2020 and 2023, the fifteen main chains accumulated more than 420 million euros in losses. In 2023, only five companies turned a profit. Billing is growing, but rents, debt and investment in openings eat into the margins. He low cost It works if you have scale. Without it, it’s a race against debt. The big question. Who is next? Synergym is not Providence’s first purchase in Spain, but the third: in the summer of 2024 absorbed ten Smartfit clubs and in November of the same year acquired Altafit for around 200 million euros. The operation with Synergym is the fourth coup in less than two years. There remain mid-sized players who fit into a second round: McFit, Fitness Park, Anytime Fitness, BeOne and a handful of regional chains. But the margin is getting smaller: the top ten chains already concentrate 54% of the market, according to DBK. The first five, 37%. The pattern is the same as always: when a sector begins to appeal to international capital, it stops being an open market and becomes an accelerated oligopoly. It happened with supermarkets, telecoms and airlines low cost. Gym fever is real. What is not yet clear is who will keep the account. In Xataka | The big lie of “cuqui fitness”: sport has been disguised as therapy to charge you more money Featured image | VivaGym

Taylor Swift has stopped by the patent office with two phrases and a photo. Its objective is to stop generative AI

by

Two phrases spoken in promotions for their latest album and a photograph from a concert from the ‘Eras ​​Tour’. Taylor Swift has simply registered that with the US Patent and Trademark Office as a strategy to shield herself from generative AI. He is not the first famous person to walk this path, but he is the first so famous. AI is already beyond the control of platforms and courts: will it succeed when the (inevitable) clash with one of the most powerful people in today’s entertainment industry arrives? The record. On April 24, Swift’s company, TAS Rights Management, submitted three applications before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). They were detected and analyzed by the lawyer specialized in intellectual property Josh Gerben: two are sound markssound marks with the phrases “Hey, it’s Taylor Swift” and “Hey, it’s Taylor”, taken from promotional introductions to her album ‘The Life of a Showgirl’. The third is a visual mark: Swift with a pink guitar and black strap, bodysuit multicolored and silver boots, on a pink stage. Legal loopholes. Generative AI can replicate a person’s voice without having to copy any specific file, usually protected by copyright. The model learns the timbre, the cadence, the phonetic pattern, and then generates completely new audios. Classic tools to protect copyright are of no use here. The loophole that Gerben believes can protect Taylor (and the rest of the artists) is the “trademark law” that pursues any use that is “confusingly similar” to something registered, that is, anything that is similar enough to generate confusion. A complicated story. Swift comes to this decision after a long history of clashes with AI. In January 2024, a flood of pornographic images generated with AI They spread across X with such speed that the platform had to temporarily block searches for their name. They had been originated on 4chanwhere users competed to avoid the filters of platforms such as DALL-E or Microsoft Designer. And in the 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump shared artificially generated images which suggested that Swift supported him. It’s not the first. Taylor Swift has a precedent in the guild. In January of this year, Matthew McConaughey became the first Hollywood actor to use this strategy on a large scale: eight trademarks that include video clips, audio recordings and his famous phrase “Alright, alright, alright” with which he debuted in ‘Movida del 76’. Paradoxically, McConaughey is an investor in ElevenLabs, a company specializing in AI voice cloning. Another trivial precedent. In 2024, Scarlett Johansson publicly denounced that OpenAI had released a voice for its GPT-4o chatbot that sounded “eerily similar” to hers, even though Johansson had previously declined an offer to lend her voice. OpenAI withdrew it, but without giving any explanation as to whether it was due to legal pressure or for another reason. It was a small victory for artists in this field, but without a judicial resolution that could set a precedent. The doubts. Gerben believes that there may be, thanks to this move by Swift, some deterrent potential: “in theory, if a lawsuit were filed over the use of Swift’s voice by an AI, she could claim that any use of her voice that sounds like the trademark violates her trademark rights.” Of course, he acknowledges that “the strategy of registering yourself has not yet been tested in court with respect to AI.” Swift and McConaughey are literally opening avenues that it is not yet clear how they will work legally. In Xataka | After destroying her tour, her film and being the queen of streaming, Taylor Swift achieves a new milestone: being a billionaire

This TV is at an outlet price at El Corte Inglés

by

Until a while ago, putting a TV larger than 80 inches in the living room was something reserved for four-figure budgets. Although this is something that can be done easily now on a lower budget. For example, in El Corte Inglés they are liquidating this television Hisense 85E7Q Pro. Now it has a 45% discount and has gone from costing 1,549 to 849.15 euros. Hisense 85E7Q Pro – QLED Smart TV The price could vary. We earn commission from these links A big TV at a reduced price It is not only a TV big; It is a panel that has been designed to convince two types of very demanding users: gamers who want to see everything in a big way and movie buffs who seek immersion. The panel of this TV is type 85 inch QLED and thanks to technology Quantum Dotcolor reproduction is more vibrant and accurate than traditional LED panels. On the other hand, while the industry standard for large format is stuck at 60 Hz refresh rate or 120 Hz, Hisense breaks the rules by offering a 144Hz native refresh ratewhich benefits those who watch action movies (offering cinematic smoothness) and also the latest generation gaming users. For them, it includes support for VRR and AMD FreeSync Premium. Another thing that large televisions usually fail in is the audio, since it is usually poor and forces us to buy a sound bar. Although Hisense has taken advantage of the 85-inch chassis of this TV to integrate a 2.1 sound system with dedicated subwooferso you can enjoy better sound quality. The operating system under which this TV works is VIDAA U7a software that feels more mature than its predecessors. It has a light interface, although it is true that it lacks the immense library of apps of Google TV. ⚡ IN SUMMARY: offer for the Hisense 85E7Q Pro smart TV today ✅ THE BEST The fluidity of 144 Hz: It is very rare to find an 85-inch TV with this refresh rate at this price. To play with a high-end PC or new generation consoles, it offers very good smoothness. Plus, if you like watching sports on TV, the movement is clear. Immersion/price ratio: Basically, it is the cheapest and most reliable way to have a two-meter-wide cinema at home with more than decent image quality. ❌ THE WORST The viewing angles… Use a VA type panel to get better blacks. The problem is that if you sit too far to the side, you will see the colors much paler and whitish than the one in the center. It is, basically, a TV to watch from the front. Size can also be your con… Not only are you going to need a huge piece of furniture, but the heat management and electrical consumption of such a large panel is considerable. In addition, any imperfection in the signal is multiplied by 10 on this 85-inch TV. 💡 BUY IT IF… You want to set up your own home theater without the complications of a projector (which requires total darkness and maintenance). It is the cheapest way to have a screen larger than two meters with very competitive image quality. ⛔ DON’T BUY IT IF… You have a small or narrow living room. If the distance between your eyes and the screen is less than 2.5 or 3 meters, 85 inches can be torture. You will have to move your neck to see from one side of the image to the other and you will notice imperfections in the antenna signal. Some accessories for this TV that may interest you Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Plus The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Hisense HS2100 – Sound Bar 2.1, 240W The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Webedia and Hisense In Xataka | Best televisions in quality price. Which one to buy and seven recommended 4K smart TVs In Xataka | Best sound bars in quality price. Which one to buy and seven recommended models from 140 euros

China is filling up with products from Russia. The problem is that many of these products come from China itself.

by

At the beginning of 2025, a more than notable event occurred in China. Apparently, trade tensions between Beijing and the EU had opened a new scenario for Russian livestock farmers. In other words, if Spain had made a fortune exporting pork to China, an unexpected enemy appeared on the horizon: Russia. It seems that the hype of Moscow goes much further than “its” pig, and in 2026 has been maintained. Russian Chinese stores. Yes, in recent years a situation has been occurring that no one saw coming: the proliferation of stores selling Russian products in cities throughout China, generating great interest among consumers. These establishments, easily recognizable by their signs in Cyrillic, traditional Russian music such as Kalinka and Katyusha, and/or the display of iconic products such as matryoshka dolls, offer a variety of products: from national sausages to chocolates, honey, vodka or durian confectionery. Thus, with slogans such as “hardcore products” and a blue and white aesthetic, the stores seek to evoke the essence of Moscow. However, as we will see, behind this facade many are more Chinese than they look. The figures. The boom has also coincided with an increase in commercial ties between China and Russia, driven by Western sanctions on Moscow after its invasion of Ukraine, the same ones that have led to Russian ranchers in the Asian nation. Not only that. Bilateral trade reached historic levels in 2022 and 2023and Chinese consumers responded enthusiastically, seeing these products as a way to show solidarity with Russia. According to data from the Qichacha business registry, In January 2025 there were 3,555 companies registered in China engaged in the trade of Russian productswith 696 and 894 new companies registered in 2023 and 2024, respectively. They are not Russian, they are Chinese. Of course, the boom also raised suspicions. In fact, the boom faced increasing scrutiny last year. Many consumers began to question the authenticity of the products offered. Sausages, for example, cannot be legally imported from Russiaand the durian, a tropical fruit, is not typical of Russian regions as far as we know. This led Chinese authorities to investigate some of these stores. For example in Fujian, where a Russian market was pointed out for promoting false health benefits and labeling domestic foods as imported. In Beijing, similar stores closed after several inspections that required proof of the authenticity of their products. In fact, in 2025 the Shanghai authorities announced investigations against seven of the 47 Russian themed stores of the city, accusing them of misleading customers regarding the origin of their products. Some were closedwhile others faced fines and the obligation to clearly label products…made in China. Finally, a Jiemian News investigation revealed that a large part of the food products in the so-called “Russian State Houses” (franchises with no connection to the Russian government) They were locally produced.. Factors of interest. The initial success of these markets and establishments can be attributed to several factors. On the one hand, consumers’ curiosity and desire to explore “exotic” productssomething that has surely played an important role. On the other hand, the geopolitical narrative surely also did its thing: the war in ukraine and tensions with the West caused some Chinese consumers to view consumption of Russian products as a gesture of political support. Furthermore, we must not forget that the increase in bilateral trade was facilitated by the exclusion of Russia from the Swift financial system in 2022forcing the country to become more dependent on the Chinese yuan. This made China Russia’s main trading partner, absorbing products such as oil, gas and food at reduced prices. With an expiration date? The big question. Despite the boom, analysts like Zhang Yi, of iiMedia Research, They believe that the fashion will be temporaryalthough in 2026 they remain patent. The demand for Russian products in the Asian nation is based, a priori, on this novelty and perceived scarcity. Among the causes of the decline are that consumers have lost interest or competition between stores increases, at which time the popularity of these markets will probably decrease. This, added to the increasing doubts about the authenticity of the products Following investigations and regulatory pressure, they could accelerate their decline. Be that as it may, and in the face of growing skepticism, in Shanghai Some stores have changed their names to “Chinese-Russian Mutual Trade Stores” to reflect the true origin of their products. In Beijing, at least one store closed after failing to present documentation proving the authenticity of their imports. Long-term perspectives. Although trade between China and Russia still strongexperts predict that exchange volume could stabilize at $200 billiona figure lower than recent records. In the long term, a change in geopolitical relations, such as the resolution of the conflict in Ukraine, could allow Russia to normalize its trade ties with Europe, thereby reducing its dependence on China. Of course, this last scenario now seems very far away. Be that as it may, the rise of markets for Russian products in China reflects how geopolitical dynamics can influence consumer habits, at least in part. Of course, its sustainability is most uncertain due to the combination of regulatory pressures, doubts about the authenticity of the products and the eventual loss of consumer interest. Just in case, to the Russians they will always have the pork. Image | Weibo In Xataka | The biggest change in war is no longer drones: it is that Russia, the US and China are removing the human from the button In Xataka | Russia and China already had an advantage over the US in the Arctic. After Greenland, it has multiplied A version of this topic was published in 2025. We have updated it with information from 2026

He arrives and hides for as many hours as necessary until his objective appears

by

In some sectors of the front in Ukraine, units began to detect something strange during the night: in the thermal cameras, small hot spots appeared motionless for hours on rooftops, roads or open fields, without anything happening… until at dawn one of them was suddenly activated and everything changed in a matter of seconds. The birth of the “patient” drone. The war in Ukraine has shaped a new figure on the battlefield, another one: a weapon that does not run or pursue targets, and that does not need to be shown, because it simply wait your moment. These are drones that arrive from the air, land silently and remain hidden for hours or even all night until their target appears, transforming combat into a matter of of patience and calculation where the decisive factor is no longer speed, but the ability to anticipate the enemy. This evolution has blurred the lines between mines, munitions and aircraft, creating a system that turns any logistics route, building or road into a latent trap. How to build an invisible ambush. They counted in Forbes The weekend that the success of these drones does not depend on improvisation, but on meticulous prior work based on signals intelligence, aerial surveillance and analysis of movement patterns to determine where and when to place each device. Once the point is chosen, the drone lands in an area that combines concealment and technical feasibility, often with landing gear modified to adapt to uneven terrain, and is connected via fiber optic (sometimes km) to avoid interference and reduce its detectable signature. From that moment on, a wait begins that can last for hours, with the operator waiting for a single opportunity in which the target enters the field of action. Attack without warning. In the videos that have started to circulate showing this type of ambush drone, whose term comes from the way the Russians have called it, Zhduns (“Waiters”)it can be seen that when the moment arrives, the blow is practically immediate and leaves very little room for reaction, since the device is activated from a minimum distance and without the acoustic warning typical of FPVs in flight. Although these systems usually load less explosive to compensate for the weight of the cable and structure, the factor of surprise compensates for this limitation, allowing precise and effective attacks that turn certain areas into psychologically hostile spaces for the enemy. The result is the creation of authentic “scary zones” where any movement can trigger an invisible attack. The war within the war. The response to these systems has generated an additional layer conflict in which there are drones that search for other drones before they “wake up”, using thermal cameras capable of detecting the residual heat of their components even when they are turned off. Added to this are more advanced sensorssweeping air patrols and the use of decoys to deceive the adversary, creating a constantly evolving game of ambushes, counter-ambushes and counter-ambushes that hardly anyone could have imagined a decade ago. In this surreal environment, superiority does not depend only on technology, but on who learns to adapt the fastest. From the air to the ground: robots that expand the trap. Yes, because this same concept of persistent risk is spreading to the ground with the increasing use of unmanned ground vehicleswhich no longer only transport supplies or evacuate wounded, but also participate in direct attacks and offensive operations. These systems allow reduce exposure of soldiers, taking on critical logistical tasks and, in some cases, holding positions for weeks or launching coordinated attacks against enemy positions. The integration of ground platforms with aerial drones adds a new dimension, allowing ambushes to be deployed from unexpected locations far from the front. Battlefield learning alone. If you also want, it is very possible that the next step points towards increasingly autonomous systems, with artificial intelligence capable of monitoring, detecting movement and alerting the operator, reducing human burden and multiplying the number of devices controlled simultaneously. Although there are technical and ethical limits, especially when it comes to identifying targets, the trend seems clear: battlefields saturated with machines capable of to wait indefinitelylearn from the environment and act at the right moment. In this scenario, war stops being a succession of visible confrontations and becomes a network of hidden threats where the most dangerous enemy is the one that has been waiting for hours (or days) without being seen. And with an unprecedented advantage: impossible to track your breath. Image | x In Xataka | Russia has an unprecedented enemy in the Ukrainian war: Japan has just landed with a weapon to take down its shaheds In Xataka | Ukraine has recalled the weapon used with Stalin to convince the US: literally, turning Donbas into “Donnyland”

Meta plans to cut 10% of its workforce in May. Its employees have been surviving a “28-day hell” for weeks

by

When last week the news was leaked that Meta was going to lay off 10% of its staff (again), the company had no choice but to make its decision public through a statement before I’m ready for it. The director of human resources, Janella Gale, acknowledged the leak and confirmed what many already feared: around 10% of the workforce will receive their dismissal notice. next May 20. The problem is that no one knows yet which profiles or departments will be fired. As the employees themselves said, this wait is precisely what is hurting them the most. There is a date marked on the calendar, there are figures on the table (about 7,800 positions eliminated plus another 6,000 that will be left uncovered), but there are no names. And in that void, thousands of employees have been trying to work normally for weeks without knowing if they will continue to occupy that table next month. Four weeks in limbo. “Welcome to the 28 days of hell.” This is how a Meta employee summed up the situation in an internal forum, and the expression quickly spread through the company’s internal communication channels. As and as detailed Business Insiderthat same uncertainty is breathed in the publications of the employees in the Blind app, where anguish, black humor and unanswered questions are mixed about what criteria will determine who stays and who leaves. In Blindan employee asked how to find motivation to work during the next few weeks knowing that layoffs are a fact and we can only wait for the names to be given to make them effective. One response summed up the general mood: “I’m getting motivated to do things that I can put on my resume for my next job,” said a Meta employee. In Meta’s own internal forums, others claimed to be focused on demonstrating results quickly, before D-day arrives, in an attempt desperate to avoid dismissal. A state of anxiety that has already lasted since 2022. For many Meta workers, this round of layoffs is not an isolated surprise. Since 2022, the company has gone through several waves of cuts, and that has left its mark on the employees who kept their jobs when thousands (hundreds of thousands, actually) of colleagues were falling into the different rounds of dismissal that Meta has applied since 2022. One employee admitted to feeling more anguish about the possibility of surviving layoffs than about being fired, because those who stay know that they will have to take on a greater workload in an increasingly pressured company. This phenomenon, called survivor syndrome, It is more common than it seems and is fueled by that uncertainty of someone who faces a situation that they know and that they know will get worse, and that perhaps they will fall into the next round of layoffs. In fact, according to some comments in that application, some employees admit to having mentally disconnected from work, and there are even those who are considering maneuvering to be included on the layoff list and thus collect compensation. AI as a background to the cut. Another factor that contributes to undermining the morale of employees who must deal with “their 28-day hell” is that, in reality, these dismissals do not occur because they are doing their job poorly or because of the company’s financial problems, but rather because of a strategic bet that puts the AI as an absolute priority for the company. If there is only one dollar to spend, that dollar will be invested in AI. “We are doing this as part of our continuous effort to manage the company more efficiently and to compensate for the other investments we are making,” said Meta’s human resources manager in her statement. Goal plans to allocate between $115 billion and $135 billion in capital investment this year alone, double the capital that he destined in 2024 to this end, with artificial intelligence as the main destination of money. Mark Zuckerberg has been making it clear for months that AI is the absolute priority of the company, which leaves positions that are not aligned with the development of that technology in an increasingly complicated position. What awaits those who are fired. Meta cuts come at the same time as Microsoft announces early retirements volunteers for the first time in its 51-year history. This new strategy is raising alarm bells about whether AI-powered automation is starting to cause a structural labor crisis in the technology sector. According to the company’s statement, Meta employees who finally receive their dismissal letter on May 20 will receive compensation of 16 weeks of base salary plus two additional weeks for each year worked in the company. “We will also cover the cost of COBRA health insurance for US employees and their families for 18 months. Packages outside the United States will be similar, but will vary by country, as will local deadlines and processes,” states the internal Meta statement signed by Gale. In Xataka | “They blame AI for layoffs they would do anyway”: Sam Altman confirms that AI has been used as an excuse to lay off Image | Unsplash (Mariia Shalabaieva, Arif Riyanto)

Google has given them permission to use their AI in classified operations

by

Google has given the Pentagon permission to use its AI models in classified military operations, thus joining OpenAI and xAI that They had already signed similar contracts previously. The AI ​​majors are joining the US military apparatus. Anthropic is left alone. what has happened. Google signed an agreement with the defense department last year worth 200 million dollars. This contract allowed the use of Google Cloud infrastructure and AI tools. The news now is that Google has given permission for the Pentagon to use the firm’s AI models in classified systems, for “any legitimate government purpose,” according to the New York Times. Why it is important. Google’s decision to allow the Pentagon to use its technology contrasts with the case of Anthropic, that ended up being blacklisted for refusing to eliminate safeguards against autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance. This set a precedent: accept the conditions or be excluded from the government market. Opacity. Speaking to the New York Times, a Google spokeswoman said the company remains committed “that AI should not be used for domestic mass surveillance or autonomous weaponry without appropriate human oversight.” However, they have not given specific details of the agreement and the fact that it will be used in “classified work” makes us wonder if Google really maintains some control or if it is simply an empty statement. Employees against. At least 560 Google employees have signed an open letter to its CEO, Sundar Pichai, in which they ask him to reject the agreement. Employees argue that AI should be in the service of humanity, not for military purposes that include lethal autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. “The only way to ensure that Google is not associated with such damages is to reject any classified workloads. Otherwise, such uses could occur without our knowledge or ability to prevent them.” New principles. Internal resistance at Google to the use of AI in military contexts is something that has been going on for a long time. In 2018, several employees resigned in protest to Google’s participation in Project Maven, the military program that used AI to identify people and objects to improve drone attacks. Google ended up leaving the project and pledged not to work on AI for weapons, but in 2025 that clause disappeared from its AI principles. Things have changed radically: today, big tech is more aligned with the US military than ever before. Image | Xataka In Xataka | Anthropic faced a long winter on the US “blacklist”: justice has saved it on the horn

wants Gemini to stop being the only AI with privileges on Android

by

The European Commission has published their preliminary conclusions on how Google manages artificial intelligence on Android. According to the organization, the operating system favors Gemini over the rest of its competitors, which is why it requires the company to apply measures to promote interoperability between other AI alternatives in its ecosystem. As might be expected, Google, for its part, is not willing to accept it without a fight. Another chapter in the Digital Markets Law. This law (DMAfor its acronym in English), is the one that forces large technology companies considered “gatekeepers” (including Alphabet) to guarantee fair conditions of competition on their platforms. Google has been subject to this legislation since March 2024 and because of this has had to introduce changes in Europesuch as showing screens so that the user can choose other search engines apart from Google on Android, or allowing alternative payment methods in its application store. Now Europe has knocked on the door again, this time over questions about Google’s AI, and it is the next chapter in this tug-of-war between regulation and private companies. Gemini rules Android. When you turn on an Android mobile with Google services, Gemini It’s already there, integrated at the system level. It can be voice activated, access screen context, interact with other apps, and generate proactive suggestions based on your activity. Applications like ChatGPT or assistant Claude They can be installed, but they do not have the same level of access. The European Commission points out specific cases where Gemini is the only way available: sending an email from the default email app, ordering food at home or sharing a photo with contacts. That, according to Brussels, is not fair competition. What the EU proposes. Preliminary measures published last Monday they point in several directions. Third-party AI services should be able to be activated using custom wake words or physical buttons on the device. They should also be able to access screen context when the user opens them, and query local device data to provide suggestions and summaries, something only Gemini now does. In addition, the Commission proposes that other AIs can control apps autonomously, such as Gemini is already starting to do (although the result still leaves something to be desired in some cases) and that external developers have access to the hardware necessary to run local models with comparable performance. Finally, Google could be forced to create new APIs and provide technical support to other AI developers who want to integrate into Android, all at no cost to third parties. Google’s response. The company was quick to react. Clare Kelly, Senior Competition Advisor, described the proposal as an “unwarranted intrusion” that “would require giving access to sensitive hardware and device permissions, unnecessarily increasing costs and undermining critical privacy and security protections for European users.” Google defends that Android is already an open ecosystem and that device manufacturers have full autonomy to customize the AI ​​services they offer to their users. What’s coming now. The process is not over. The Commission is opening a public consultation until May 13, after which it will review the input they have received (including from Google) before issuing a decision by July 27. If Google does not comply with the measures or an agreement is not reached, the company is exposed to fines of up to 10% of its global annual turnover. Just like share from Ars Technica, although Google would not have to open its systems all at once, implementing these changes would take time and doing so in a hurry could create security risks. Furthermore, as is often the case with DMA decisions, any changes that finally occur would be, at least in principle, limited to the European market. Cover image | José García and François Genon In Xataka | A developer went to sleep with a $10 alert on Google Cloud: he woke up to a bill of more than $18,000

If you were waiting for Xiaomi to launch cheap cars, its CEO encourages you to continue waiting seated

by

Xiaomi has been in the automobile market for a couple of years (although it is still we are waiting for your arrival in Europe), and in contrast to what the brand offers in other areas such as smartphones, the company wants to position itself rather high in the price table of its cars. Lei Jun, CEO of Xiaomi, confirmed during a live broadcast on April 17 that the brand has no intention of launching electric vehicles below 100,000 yuan (about 12,500 euros) in the coming years. Here, as expected from the figures, he talks about the Chinese market. Communication. Lei Jun made these statements during a live autonomy test in which he drove a new generation SU7 Pro from Beijing to Shanghai (1,265 kilometers) with a single stop to charge. On the way, he took the opportunity to chat with the chat, a calculated communication strategy that has been noticed. Luckily, during the talk, we were able to find very interesting statements from the head of the brand himself and get an idea of ​​his roadmap. No to the cheap car. According to counted Jun during the broadcast, today’s competitive electric cars increasingly depend on intelligent driving systems, and that type of technology has a high cost that does not fit with a sales price below that barrier of 100,000 yuan in China. According to collect the media CarNewsChina, Lei himself recognized that the new generation of the SU7 It accumulates more than 100 improvements compared to the previous model, with an increase in material costs of almost 20,000 yuan, but its selling price only rose by about 4,000 yuan. For Xiaomi, the equation applied to an entry-level car simply does not add up. Where Xiaomi does want to be. The updated SU7 starts at 219,900 yuan (around 27,500 euros), and the brand’s direction points even higher, as the firm is ready to launch its SU7 Ultra which already competes in the high-performance segment, and in the not too distant future models such as the YU7 GT or a premium variant of the SU7 will also appear, according to they count from ChinaEVHome. We will have to see prices when the firm lands in Europe with its SU7, but everything indicates that Xiaomi wants to consolidate itself within the field of the mid/high range of automobiles. The Chinese car is not synonymous with cheap. Xiaomi is not the only one that avoids the price war in the entry segment. He Xiaopeng, president of XPeng, declared during the presentation of MONA M03 that his company also has no plans to go below that 100,000 yuan threshold. Among the reasons it gave were too tight margins, unsustainable investment in smart technology and real risk of a destructive price spiral. What the numbers say. Sales data in China reinforce this reading. And it is that according to figures collected by CarNewsChina, entry-level electric cars, such as the Wuling Hongguang Mini EV or the BYD Seagull (Dolphin Surf here in Spain), registered year-on-year falls of almost 58% in the first months of 2026, partly due to the end of tax exemptions on purchases. The sedan and utility vehicle segment as a whole also fell almost 20% year-on-year in March. The volume is there, but the profitability is not. Promises. All in all, Lei Jun left a door ajar in the long term. Their goal is for Xiaomi to be among the five largest car manufacturers in the world. Reaching that scale would, sooner or later, require greater price coverage. But for this scenario to come true, there still seems to be time. Cover image | Xiaomi In Xataka | Journey to the center of the Chinese motor (part 2): I have seen the future of cars in Beijing and yes, it is electric (and very cool)

The closure of Hormuz is the symptom of a much more threatening problem: the straits are no longer reliable

by

The world watches the Strait of Hormuz waiting for a sign of normality that does not come. After weeks of conflict, the official “reopening” narrative faces a devastating mathematical and logistical reality. What we are witnessing is not a temporary blip in trade, but, as experts warnthe confirmation that the system of “bottlenecks” that supported the global economy has been definitively broken. At first glance, the news of a ceasefire and the “reopening” of Hormuz should have reassured the markets. However, the reality on the ground is very different. Cyril Widdershoven, analyst OilPricedescribes this supposed normality as a “mirage.” While under normal conditions the strait registers between 120 and 140 daily transits, data from April 2026 show days with just three boats. Why don’t we see the total disaster on our streets yet? The answer lies in the physics of shipping. As we have already explaineda supertanker moves at the speed of a bicycle. The crude oil we consume today is the one that “pedaled” through the ocean before the conflict broke out. According to the data of Kpler206 million barrels have already “vanished” from the market in just 40 days. Logistical inertia has kept us in a false calm, but the shock wave is about to reach us. The report of Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)titled “The Strait of Hormuz in 8 Charts“, confirms that the strait has been “effectively closed” since March 2. Although Tehran announced an opening on April 17, the Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) turned back just 24 hours later, threatening to attack any ship that collaborates with “the enemy.” In Xataka It is true that we have not yet noticed 100% the effect of the closure of Hormuz. The reasons are not at all optimistic The end of trust and the petrodollar What makes this crisis different from Suez is the trust factor. Analyst Widdershoven points out that the system It is not broken by geography, but by the perception of risk. When insurers withdraw “war risk” coverage, the strait ceases to exist economically, even though it is physically open. But the impact goes beyond the price of gasoline. Aaron Brown, in Bloombergissues a historic warning: “The war in Iran has just broken the petrodollar.” The 1974 pact, where the US guaranteed security in the Gulf in exchange for oil being sold in dollars and that money being reinvested in US debt, has collapsed. Countries like India or Türkiye are selling their US Treasury bonds to obtain liquidity and pay for increasingly expensive crude oil. For the first time in decades, central banks hold more gold than US bonds. Even if full peace were signed tomorrow, a return to normality is a technical chimera. Jacob Judah, in Financial Timesdescribes a “demining nightmare.” Iran has seeded the strait with sophisticated mines that can be camouflaged as rocks or buried in the seabed. Clearing a safe lane just a mile wide could take weeks; clear the strait completely, months. And, as Judah points out, the US Navy has neglected its mine warfare capability for decades. On the other hand, the recovery capacity of inventories is discouraging. Fatih Birol, director of the IEA, has declared to Reuters that this crisis is “more serious than those of 1973, 1979 and 2022 combined.” The IEA report from April estimates the collapse of global supply at 10.1 million of barrels daily. However, even producing an extra million barrels a day, it will take the world two years to recover pre-conflict inventory levels. Terrestrial alternatives are not the solution either. According to Holly Ellyatt for the CNBCthe pipelines that cross Saudi Arabia (East-West) and the UAE (Fujairah) only have the capacity to absorb between 3.5 and 5.5 million barrels per day, a fraction of the 20 million that normally flow through Hormuz. Behind the barrel numbers there is an invisible human drama. Wired tells the situation of 20,000 sailors trapped in the Gulf. Stories like that of PK Vijay, an Indian sailor on an abandoned ship, show how the complexity of maritime registration leaves workers in legal limbo, without pay and without the possibility of disembarking in a war zone. On a legal level, the situation is just as swampy. As the West condemns Iran, Maryam Jamshidi in The Nation argues that, technically, the US and Israel are the ones who have violated international law with their “war of aggression.” Iran, having not ratified the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), has a legal basis to regulate passage through its territorial waters and collect tolls, something that Western powers describe as “economic hostage-taking.” {“videoId”:”x8j6422″,”autoplay”:false,”title”:”Declassified video of the clash between Russian fighters and the American drone”, “tag”:”united states”, “duration”:”42″} Suez was the warning, but Hormuz is confirmation that the era of just-in-time logistics and cheap, frictionless energy is over. The global economy has discovered, in the worst possible way, that its heart continues to beat to the rhythm of slow ships. As the analysis concludes OilPriceHormuz is no longer just a step; It is a tectonic fault. The world that emerges from this crisis will be one of “resilience over efficiency”, where trade will be more regional, more redundant and, inevitably, much more expensive. The price of security has become permanently embedded in the price of oil, and with it, the future of the world economy. Image |NASA GSFC Xataka |The US resurrected the “right of prey” to capture a ship from China: the problem is that China has taken note (function() { window._JS_MODULES = window._JS_MODULES || {}; var headElement = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)(0); if (_JS_MODULES.instagram) { var instagramScript = document.createElement(‘script’); instagramScript.src=”https://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js”; instagramScript.async = true; instagramScript.defer = true; headElement.appendChild(instagramScript); – The news The closure of Hormuz is the symptom of a much more threatening problem: the straits are no longer reliable was originally published in Xataka by Alba Otero .

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.