The last thing we expected to see in the “war on the wolf” was this: armored sheep
The image of a sheep equipped with plastic armor full of spikes seems straight out of a medieval fantasy film, but it is the last story we have known about the complex coexistence between livestock and large predators. However, beyond the ingenuity of individual solutions, scientific literature has spent decades analyzing which non-lethal measures are truly effective in protecting livestock that do not involve covering a sheep with armor as if it were a medieval soldier. The armored sheep. Recently, different media echoed the story of Rudolf Schaubach, a 72-year-old rancher from Villach (Austria) who has come to the fore for registering with the European Patent Office an unusual invention which consists of a plastic net with sharp spikes that surrounds the animal, imitating the defense mechanism of a hedgehog. And desperation in the face of the economic losses caused by large predators destroying his sheep pushed this rancher to make this decision in order to ultimately protect his animals. The result. Equipping a single animal took about an hour, which makes this idea a logistically unaffordable process for an entire herd, since equipping them all would require even more workers. In addition, animal organizations they ended up denouncing the initiative for possible non-compliance with animal welfare regulations when seeing that the animal could suffer with that plastic armor on top and also for the damage to predators. What science says. When experts analyze the conflict between ranchers and predators, they warn that the evidence available is heterogeneous and that we should avoid absolute statements that a measure is magnificent and always works. Here they point out that the effectiveness of the measures taken depends enormously on the geographical context, the type of exploitation and the pressure from predators. We have an example in 2018, where a scientific review exhaustively reviewed the state of livestock protection. Their first conclusion is a slap on the wrist for research, since they pointed out that strong experimental evidence is still lacking in many of the methods that are applied. Despite this, the study did manage to identify which tools have better support highlighting the use of guard dogsthe fences and the fladry, which is nothing more than a line of ropes with colored flags that flutter in the wind, acting as a visual deterrent for wolves. More conservative. One measure that can be considered in response to these problems is to kill the predator, but here science indicates that lethal control is not the most consistent response in the long term. In fact, they insist that the solution is to change the way herds are managed. We have the best example in a 2017 study where different scoldings from the United States were analyzed for seven years. The research showed that implementing an adaptive strategy of non-lethal measures dramatically reduced sheep losses to wolves in the protected area compared to areas where such management was not applied. That is why prevention is not about putting up a fence and forgetting about it, but about evaluating, adapting grazing, moving flocks strategically and keeping dogs alert. Images | LT1 OÖ In Xataka | Galicia lacks shepherds to clean the mountains. So he has done the most logical thing: create a school for shepherds