How to add all the World Cup matches directly to your calendar

Let’s explain to you how to add all the world cup matches directly to your calendarboth Google and Apple. This way, you can always know what game is playing each day and what the schedules are. This is possible thanks to the community of users, and a specific one who has created this calendar that you can easily add to your account. In it you will find the entire group stage with notifications 5 minutes before each game. The calendar will be updated later with the following rounds. One thing you should keep in mind is that you will be adding a third party calendarcreated by a user. This is a dangerous thingas it may allow this user to insert malicious links. We are going to suggest two calendars and tell you step by step how to add them. Calendar with all the World Cup matches We are going to give you two options for your calendar. The first is from the user @augustonarvaez8 of X, which has a version for Google Calendar and another for Apple Calendar. you also have iSpooker versionwhich has this link where you will find the versions for both calendars, as well as an online version. Then, you will only have to click on the link to the Google or Apple calendar, although the steps change depending on which one you use. Add matches to Google Calendar To add calendars to Google Calendar, what you have to do is click the corresponding link. Once you do, Google Calendar will open directly asking you for permission to add it, and simply press the button Add that appears in the window. Once you do this, you will have the World Cup calendar in the section Other calendarsand you can activate and deactivate it whenever you want. You’ll also be able to edit it to add a specific color for your quotes. Then all you have left is click on the match you wantand depending on the creator you will be able to see all the information they have added. Add matches to Apple Calendar In the case of Apple, the operation is not so intuitive. Clicking on the calendar link you will download an .ics filewhich is the format of calendars. Then you have to open the Apple calendar, and click on Archivefor choose the option Matter. This will open a file explorer window, where you will have to choose to import the ICS calendar that you downloaded from the link. And that’s it, with this you will have all the World Cup matches on your calendar. In Xataka Basics | Apps for football results 2025: the best 14 applications to receive notifications and view match statistics

Kimi Code does 75% of what Claude Code does at 20% of its price. The question is whether that 25% that is missing is the one that matters.

A few days ago, the Chinese company Moonshot AI launched Kimi K2.6its new LLM that competes with the Gemini, GPT and Claude model families and is also especially competitive in price. Weeks earlier, it had launched Kimi Code, a programming AI agent that in turn competes with Gemini Cli, Codex and Claude Code. The question is obvious: can the Kimi Code/Kimi K2.6 pairing really compete with the fashionable pairing, Claude Code/Opus 4.7? The answer is complicated. A great model (but not perfect). Kimi K2.6 is an open weights model with one trillion parameters in total (an American trillion), of which 32 billion parameters are active and which uses the well-known Mixture-of-Experts architecture. In it launch article Its performance is shown compared to that of GPT-5.4 and Opus 4.6 and the truth is that its numbers in these synthetic tests seem really excellent: Here Kimi K2.6 is compared to GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro. Source: Moonshot AI. Up to 8 times cheaper than Opus 4.6. Has subscription plans Claude Pro or ChatGPT Plus style, but it can also be used via API. The price in that case is $0.60 per million input tokens (0.16 if cached) and $4 per million output tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens, or up to eight times more. Claude Opus 4.7 It has the same price and is theoretically better in performance, but when Kimi K2.6 was announced this version had not yet appeared (nor GPT-5.5). The magic of the swarm of AI agents. Claude Code works sequentially. Analyze the problem, execute a step, check the result and decide how to proceed. In Kimi Code a different approach is used: a “master agent” divides or decomposes the task we ask of it into independent subtasks and from that division launches up to 300 “subagents” that run in parallel and are capable of coordinating up to 4,000 steps simultaneously. Are many working at the same time better than one? It is the so-called “swarm of agents” of Kimi K2.6 that is used to the fullest in Kimi Code and that we can also activate in its free version on its official website. In Kimi K2.5 up to 100 subagents and 1,500 steps could be launched, so the jump is significant. In internal tests, Moonshot showed how these swarms managed, for example, to “refactor” an open source financial engine, working 13 hours straight and making more than 1,000 tool calls with a 185% improvement in average performance. Of course, these were internal tests. Beyond benchmarks. Kilo.ai is a company that develops tools like Kilo Code or Kilo CLI—programming agents similar to Kimi Code—and its engineers wanted evaluate the performance of both combinations. They gave Claude Opus 4.7 and Kimi K2.6 the same 1,042-line prompt to create FlowGraph, a workflow orchestration API with directed graph validation or real-time event streaming. Both models ran on Kilo CLI because what they wanted to compare were the models without further ado. Kimi was cheaper, but he also failed more. Claude Opus 4.7 finished in 20 minutes and the final cost was $3.56. Kimi K2.6 took longer, partly because server availability was limited (the model had just been launched), but it cost $0.67. Five times less. Kimi K2.6 did it well at a ridiculous price. Claude did much better, but it also cost five times as much. Kimi did 75% of what Claude did at 19% of the cost. The problem is that both believed they had done everything right and did not detect if they had made mistakes. Further analysis revealed that Claude had committed one and that Kimi had committed six of varying importance. According to Kilo.ai analysts, the final score for both was 91 points out of 100 for Opus 4.7 and 68 points out of 100 for Kimi. Two ways to see the glass. That score seems to make it clear that Kimi is simply cheaper because he did a worse job. But Kilo engineers had another way of looking at it. They have been comparing open weight models of Chinese companies for some time and have noticed how the gap with the “frontier” models of Anthropic or OpenAI is becoming less and less pronounced. “With a price of $0.67 and a thorough review, Kimi K2.6 is now a viable option. With a price of $3.56 and fewer fixes needed, Claude Opus 4.7 is the safer option. The choice between the two options depends on the analysis. A year ago, this choice was practically non-existent at this level of complexity.” Review is mandatory. Or what is the same: if after the work of Kimi K2.6 one carried out a more in-depth review and correction, it is likely that all these errors would be detected and corrected, but if we had to trust both models and we could only execute “one pass” of AI execution, Opus 4.7 would win the game. The key is that: one should not trust the code of any model right away, and it is advisable to always review that code. The geopolitical factor. Kimi and Kimi Code come from China, and the startup Moonshot AI has financial backing from Alibaba. The code that is processed in these models passes through their servers, something that for an individual developer may be irrelevant. However, for a company with sensitive proprietary code, contracts that must comply with certain European or American regulations and projects in regulated sectors, this can be a significant obstacle. Kimi Code mitigates this problem by offering the possibility of running the model locally thanks to its open weights, but that requires very powerful machines and eliminates part of the cost advantage. What Kimi Code has that Claude Code doesn’t. The clearest difference between both programming AI agents is parallelism. As we said, the ability to launch up to 300 subagents to work simultaneously attacking the same problem at the same time is remarkable. For analysis of large repositories or generation … Read more

The best tricks to improve your prompts in Claude, two types of structure explained by the Claude team itself

Let’s tell you two structures to create better prompts in Claude, explained by the Anthropic team, creators of this artificial intelligence. They are very precise structures for this specific AI, although they will also work well in other alternatives such as ChatGPT , Gemini either Copilot inter alia. This is something more advanced than when we taught you how to improve Claude’s answers in a simple way. This is a lesson in good prompting practices using engineering engineering. promptsthe practice with which to improve the commands you give to applications LLM. Come on, these are tricks to learn how to communicate with an AI more effectively and shape its responses so that they are better, more reliable, and more tailored to the task you want it to perform. We are going to offer you two prompt structures. The first is a simple five step structure. It is perfect for relatively simple or slightly advanced tasks, and we are going to explain it to you in depth. Then there is a structure for much more sophisticated tasks that has ten steps, and in this case we are going to summarize it for you. Five-step structure of a good prompt The best way to communicate with artificial intelligence and with Claude in particular is to know the best structure for a good prompt. These structures are set up to make sure you give you all the information necessary for the AI ​​to correctly understand what you are asking it to do. This is the best structure for a prompt according to Anthropic: One or two sentences to establish the role and description of the task you want me to do. Add dynamic content to contextualize Detailed task instructions Examples of what you want it to do (optional) Repeat critical instructions (especially when you write a very long prompt. 1. Describe the role and task to be performed As you can see, first of all you need to spend some time establishing the role of the AI, saying what role it should play. For example, telling you that you are a high school teacher, or an AI specialized in reviewing accident reporting forms. Along with the role of AI, it is also recommended describe the task to be performed. Come on, this is where you have to tell him what you want him to do by playing the role that you have indicated. These two elements should be the beginning of a good prompt. 2. Add dynamic content to contextualize After describing the task, it is helpful to provide content to better contextualize your task or the content you want me to work on. For example, if you want it to analyze a text, a photograph, or even a web link, you should add it after the description. This content can also be another element that you have obtained from an application, or even from an AI, whether it is a screenshot or something else. The main thing is that add what the AI ​​needs to do what you asked it to do. You can attach several files, but then you will have to describe well what you want it to do with each one. 3. Detailed task instructions At the beginning of the prompt you have told it in summary what you want it to do, and then you have attached the content on which you want it to work. Now, after this introduction you will have to detail task instructions What do you want me to do? This fragment of text becomes the heart of the task you are programming. You will have to tell it what you want it to do precisely, just as if you were telling it to a person so that they understand it correctly without having to ask you anything else. If you have added several images or different types of content for context, you will also have to explain what you want it to do with each of the elements. 4. You can give him examples of what you want him to do When you do not give the AI ​​any example of the result you want it to offer you, it is what is called a Zero-shot or “0 examples”. With this, you will blindly trust that the artificial intelligence model knows how to do the task. However, when you want to obtain very specific results or with a specific formatthen you should explain this with examples. You can use a single example or multiple examples. By doing this, the model will see the examples of the task already classified or solved, and will use that information to generate the new answers. keeping the same response format that you have indicated. The more examples you give, the more precise the answer format will be. This is optional, but in tasks that require a specific type of response it can be very useful. 5. Repeat critical instructions. You’ve started by describing the task, and then you’ve given him a thorough description of each step he must take. But if you’re asking it to do a very complex task with a particularly long prompt, it’s a good idea to at the end repeat the most critical instructions of the task you have asked him to do. This is the equivalent of underlining the most important and vital points of the instructions, something that you think is absolutely vital that you always keep in mind and not overlook it. Advanced prompt structure in 10 steps If the five-step structure isn’t enough for you, Claude’s creators also aim for a 10-step structure. It is like the first one we told you about, but more fragmented to give AI each and every detail what you will need. Each of these steps can be one or several paragraphs in the prompt that we are going to compose. You don’t have to do this every time, normally the previous structure is enough, but for particularly complex tasks can help you. … Read more

Today the green turtles are finally out of danger

Halfway between South America and Africa, in the immensity of the Atlantic Ocean, a small volcanic point emerges that is the ascension island. For centuries, this piece of land was the scene of a systematic massacre, but today it represents one of the greatest success stories of marine conservation in the 21st century, culminating last October with a historic announcement that the green turtle has officially gone from being “endangered” to being classified as “least concern.” His story. To understand the magnitude of the Ascension phenomenon, you must first understand the journey since each season, thousands of green turtles They travel 2,300 kilometers from the coasts of Brazil to this remote island to spawnthat is, release their eggs. But… How do they manage to find this small island in an ocean as enormous as the Atlantic? A GPS. The famous biologist Archie Carr proposed in his day that these creatures use a kind of “olfactory GPS”, with which they were capable of find chemical fingerprints dissolved in the ocean currents that emanate from the island. Although the exact mechanics remain the subject of study, since genetic analyzes based on mitochondrial DNA leave no doubt that there are perfectly differentiated Atlantic populations and that of Ascension has a unique signature. In fact, studies indicate that turtles born in Ascensión travel throughout the American continent, representing between 43% and 47% of those captured on the coasts of Uruguay and entering the Patagonian Sea. A dark past. Since its discovery in 1501, Portuguese and British sailors saw Ascension not as a sanctuary, but as an all-you-can-eat buffet, as has been masterfully documented. in works as Ascension: The Story of a South Atlantic Island by Duff Hart-Davis. For centuries, common practices were “flipping” where sailors literally turned turtles over on the beach, immobilizing them to keep them alive with their fresh meat for months. Here there are historical testimonies such as that of chaplain John Ovington in 1691 who recounts the industrialized slaughter of these reptiles, which were sent alive to England to satisfy the demand for “turtle soup.” Something that brought the species to the brink of extinction. A turning point. It arrived in 1977, and coincides with the moment it began control and monitoring of this species on nesting beaches, reversing centuries of human impact. And the results indicate that while in 1977 3,752 nests were counted annually, today the island hosts more than 25,000 nests each year. Images | wirestock on Freepik In Xataka | We have been thinking for 40 years that Spain escaped Chernobyl because it was far away. AEMET has discovered that it was pure luck

The Musk-Altman trial, the soap opera of the year in Silicon Valley

That Elon Musk and Sam Altman hate each other It’s nothing new. The news is that their rivalry is about to reach the courts. Yesterday jury selection took place which will decide whether, as Musk says, OpenAI violated its founding agreement to be a nonprofit organization. Much more is judged than that; The case aims to be a soap opera in which years of personal conflict will be aired. The accusation. In 2024, Elon Musk sued Sam Altman and OpenAI for having broken the company’s founding agreement, which said that “OpenAI is a non-profit artificial intelligence research company.” The CEO of SpaceX, who was one of the founders of OpenAI, claims that he was scammed and as soon as they got his money ($38 million) “he radically changed the narrative and dedicated himself to profiting (…) taking advantage of his humanitarian concern.” Musk calls for the dismissal of Sam Altman and his president, Greg Brockman, as well as $134 billion that would go to the nonprofit arm of OpenAI. OpenAI’s response. According to the company, Elon Musk was aware of the plan become a for-profit entitywhich was a necessary step for the company. OpenAI says that Musk is jealous and “regrets having retired” in 2018. In addition, they say that the money Musk contributed was not an investment, but a donation, and does not give him any ownership rights over OpenAI, as they say in Guardian. The breakup. OpenAI was founded in 2015 and shortly after, in 2017, it became clear that developing the dreamed-of AGI was going to require a lot of money, something difficult to achieve as a non-profit company. Here the option of a collaboration between OpenAI and Tesla was raised to solve the financing problem. According to OpenAI, Musk wanted full control of the company and this is where everything went wrong. The timing. Although he left the company in 2018, Musk does not sue OpenAI until 2024. During this time, OpenAI launched ChatGPT and ended up signing its great agreement with Microsoft. Apparently, this was what finally pissed off Musk, who accused OpenAI of having become a branch of Microsoft. Their objective was to annul the agreement, although much has happened since then. Today, OpenAI is the most valuable private company in the worldwith investments from giants such as NVIDIA, Amazon or Softbank. If Musk wins, his problem is no longer canceling the agreement with Microsoft, but something much more important: it puts at stake its planned IPO. A personal rivalry. Beyond the official accusations, Musk and Altman have a personal rivalry that has been brewing for years with countless public taunts and accusations. Musk has said that Altman is a liar and a scammer (He usually calls it ‘Scam Altman’) or that ChatGPT is a ‘woke’ AI. Altman has not been left behind; He has said that Musk is an idiot and even ridiculed him for the Tesla he bought and that was never deliveredgoing so far as to publish emails asking for a refund. In the trial, private details such as Elon Musk’s use of ketamine are expected to be aired, something that according to OpenAI is relevant since it portrays his mental state quite well. Let the show begin. Cover image | Village Global and Gage Skidmorevia Flickr In Xataka | MACROHARD is Elon Musk’s mockery of Microsoft: an AI agent that no other company can get. Still

forcing the same companies to comply with incompatible laws

The Chinese State Council has published two decrees which do not leave much room for interpretation: One on security of industrial supply chains, signed on March 31. And another on improper extraterritorial jurisdiction, published April 13. Together they form the most explicit legal arsenal the Chinese government has yet built to combat Western sanctions, and to warn foreign companies that choosing sides has consequences. Good or bad. Why is it important. For years, China has responded to pressures from across the Pacific with tools ad hoc and implicit signals. Now it does so by decree of the Council of State, the supreme executive body. It’s actually the same written strategy as before, but now black on white. The context. The first of the documents, known internally as Decree 834, is linked to the Chinese national security law and obliges ministries and local governments to identify, optimize and protect industrial supply chains considered strategic. The immediate trigger has been the war in Iran, which has interrupted the flow of sulfuric acidurea and other chemical inputs that China needs for its industry and agricultural sector. But the document comes from further afield: it is the culmination of decades of policy of self-sufficiency in resources, from rare earths to lithium. Between the lines. The most striking thing about Decree 834 is not what it regulates, but what it threatens. It includes explicit language about China’s right to investigate and take countermeasures against any foreign actor that “disrupts the normal functioning of markets” or imposes “discriminatory restrictions” on Chinese supply chains. The definition is broad on purpose. A Western company that pressures its government to sanction a Chinese competitor could find itself in the spotlight, as It already happened with Micron in 2023. The question. The second decree is even more direct. Their Regulations on Improper Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of Foreign Countries They say that if China considers foreign regulations that affect Chinese interests illegitimate, companies that comply with them are exposed to Chinese sanctions. Put another way: If the United States prohibits you from selling to China and China considers that prohibition “improper,” you will have to choose who you disobey. Possible sanctions include fines, bans on entry and exit from the territory, and export and import restrictions. The decree establishes a formal review mechanism: companies can ask the Chinese government for an exemption if they demonstrate that compliance with the foreign standard is unavoidable. This exemption can be granted or denied, which will turn the companies themselves into negotiating leverage between governments. Like Huawei in 2018. Yes, but. If a foreign government imposes a regulation that China does not want to abide by, it can announce that it is “improper,” wait for the affected companies to ask for an exemption, and use them as bargaining chips in diplomatic negotiations. It will happen because it is predictable and because that is where the incentives fit. The background. Since the 2018 trade war and semiconductor export controls, China has built a legal repertoire of response that includes Antitrust Lawthe List of Untrustworthy Entities and the Anti-Sanctions Law. These two new decrees do not open doors that no longer existed, but they do mark them with a neon sign. The message for foreign companies that do lobbying in the United States against Chinese competitors is crystal clear. Featured image | Xataka In Xataka | China has banned another AI startup from exporting talent and research: little by little, it is “nationalizing” AI

The best tech deals on Amazon for less than 50 euros today, April 28

April is coming to an end and if you are looking to renew or buy new technological devices for your home, Amazon is one of those stores where you can get very good deals. These are the best deals in technology for less than 50 euros that we found today, April 28, in this store. Tenda RX2L Pro – AX1500 WiFi 6 Router The price could vary. We earn commission from these links speaker system Logitech Z207 Bluetooth by 46.45 euros: with 3.5 mm input and 10 W of power. surveillance camera Reolink E1 Pro by 42.49 euros: Supports dual band WiFi. WiFi 6 router Tenda RX2L Pro by 29.99 euros: with WiFi 6 and five antennas. Smart humidifier Dreo by 49.99 euros– Compatible with Alexa and Google Assistant. wireless mouse Logitech Ergo M575S by 34.99 euros: with customizable buttons and trackball. Logitech Z207 Bluetooth Speaker System If you want to give your computer better sound, this Logitech Z207 Bluetooth speaker system is perfect now that it’s on sale. It has gone from costing 71.99 euros to 46.45 eurossince it has applied a 35% discount. This is a speaker system that you can pair to two Bluetooth devices or connect a device via the 3.5mm input. It pairs easily using the Bluetooth button and has an integrated headphone jack. The total power it offers is 10 W. Logitech Z207 Bluetooth PC Speaker System The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Reolink E1 Pro surveillance camera The time is approaching when getaways and departures from home are more continuous. If you are looking for a good option for have your home under control when you are awaythis Reolink surveillance camera is a good option. Its usual price is 49.99 euros, but now you can get it for 42.49 euros. This surveillance camera for indoors it offers a resolution of 2,880 x 1,616 pixels and is supports dual band WiFi. It has detection assisted by Artificial Intelligence and multiple storage options. Reolink E1 Pro 3K PT Indoor Camera The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Tenda RX2L Pro WiFi 6 Router If you want to have a good Internet connection at home, this Tenda RX2L Pro is a WiFi router that will come in handy. Its recommended price is 49.99 euros, but now it has a 40% discountbeing able to buy it for 29.99 euros. This router is equipped with WiFi 6 technology and offers dual-band speeds of up to 1,501 Mbps. It is equipped with five non-detachable antennas and technology beamformingwhich effectively improves signal transmission. Tenda RX2L Pro – AX1500 WiFi 6 Router The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Dreo Smart Humidifier It’s allergy time and maintain the best environment at home It is ideal to be able to cope with allergic rhinitis, for example, better at home. This one from Dreo has a recommended RRP of 59.99 euros, but now you can get it for 49.99 euros. This is a humidifier that you can control via app and voice commands, as it is compatible with Google Assistant and Alexa. It creates a mist three times larger than most humidifiers on the market and its four-liter tank offers up to 32 hours of mist. Dreo Smart Humidifier The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Logitech Ergo M575S Wireless Mouse With a 41% discountthis Logitech ergonomic mouse has gone from costing 58.99 euros (recommended RRP) to 34.99 euros. If there is something it stands out for, it is its cut shape, which keeps your hand relaxed for hours. From the firm they guarantee a 25% less muscle tension on the forearm using this mouse. In addition, it has three customizable buttons, so you can establish shortcuts that will save you time. Additionally, it comes with a wireless trackball. Logitech Ergo M575S wireless trackball mouse The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Logitech, Reolink, Dreame and Tenda In Xataka | The best mobile phones, we have tested them and here are their analyzes In Xataka | Best wireless headphones. Which one to buy and 21 models from 15 euros to 470 euros

It is not that Germany is promoting the four-day work day, it is that it is the country that works the fewest hours per year

In May 2025 and through the Eurostat dataa reality was confirmed that sometimes confuses a story: the myth that says that Germans work harder than Spaniards did not stand with figures in hand. The key, as we comment thenwas in the quality of the labor market: a good part of German workers work fewer hours per week in part-time jobs, but they did so for more years than Spanish workers. And now the OECD has arrived to put Germany in your place. Work identity crisis. Germany, traditionally associated with discipline and productivity, today faces a paradox: according to the OECDis the developed country where fewer hours worked per year, just 1,331 compared to the 1,898 of Greece or the 1,716 of Portugal. The situation represents a symbolic blow for a country that just a decade ago imposed austerity policies on southern countries, stigmatizing them as not being hard-working. The drop in workload is combined with a economic deterioration palpable: unemployment has exceeded three million people For the first time in a decade, the economy has contracted for two consecutive years and the GDP is already lower than in 2019, while Spain and Greece are growing at rapid rates. greater than 2%. The debate about work. we have been counting. The reduction in hours worked has become on central theme in German politics. Chancellor Friedrich Merz warns that four-day work weeks and an overemphasis on “life balance” will not sustain the country’s prosperity. The data they are striking: German workers enjoy longer vacations than the legal minimum, numerous holidays and an average of 19 sick leave a year, compared to 16 before the pandemic, a change that experts attribute more to culture than health. Scandals like that of a teacher on leave since 2009 receiving full salary have reinforced the perception that labor laxity is unsustainable. The roots of the phenomenon. They counted in the Washington Post that specialists maintain that it is not about laziness, but rather structural barriers. Almost half of German women work part-time, a figure that exceeds 65% in the case of mothers, which translates into one of the largest gaps in full-time equivalent employment in the entire EU. Historical factors also weigh in: in West Germany, working mothers were stigmatized like “crow mothers”while in the East, under the socialist model, full-time employment was promoted with daycare from an early age. Currently, cultural differences and a child care system with short hours persist that prevent many families from holding full-time jobs. Proposals and resistances. The experts match in which expanding daycare centers and extending their hours would be decisive, but technical solutions collide with politics. Changing the tax system from joint to individual filing could add the equivalent of half a million jobs full-time, but it is perceived as “anti-family” and difficult to approve. For their part, businessmen they claim less bureaucracy and more immigrationwhile some researchers advocate for simple reforms that free up hidden work hours. However, government responses have been considered timid and insufficient, and the feeling of postponement persists. The four-day elephant. Paradoxically, while political leaders call for more work, more and more companies are experimenting with shorter work weeks. In 2024, 45 companies will test the four day week with equal salaries and reduced hours, with positive results: higher productivity per hour and more satisfied employees. The majority of these firms plan to maintain the model, consolidating the trend in favor of free time. Thus, Germany moves between two poles: a productive system that suffers stagnation and pressure to lengthen working hours, and a society that increasingly values ​​life outside of work, drawing a clash of visions that puts not only the economy, but the identity of the country at stake. Image | International Tr In Xataka | Germany seeks a revolutionary change in its labor system: making working more hours profitable In Xataka | Germany tried working four days a week: seven out of 10 companies no longer want to work five days a week A version of this article was originally published in September 2025

Athletics has just experienced its own “moon landing.” And Adidas has defeated Nike in its particular space race

May 6, 2017. Eliud Kipchoge appears on the finish line of the Monza circuit, northern Italy. This time the sound of the engines is provided by the crash against the asphalt of the athletes who accompany the Kenyan in the breaking 2the first attempt to go under two hours in marathon distance. But it is the tires that attract attention. The feet fit the Nike Vaporfly Elite. A very high profile, a foam with an absorption capacity unlike anything seen before. And the most striking thing: a carbon plate. The promise is that the shoe saves energy when running. That is, fatigue comes later and/or the athlete can run faster with the same feeling of effort. Almost a decade ago, Eliud Kipchoge was a handful of seconds away from breaking the two-hour marathon distance. He breaking 2 It did not break the desired 120-minute barrier, but Nike had just opened a new page in the history of athletics. A space race began that has ended almost nine years after that challenge. On April 26, 2026, the moon was reached. But Adidas has put the flag. A photo for history Since 2017 we have been wondering who would be the first man to break under two hours in a conventional marathon. Eliud Kipchoge himself achieved it the following year, becoming the first to complete the 42,195 meters in less than 120 minutes. But the event, surrounded by hares, with a car making a screen to block the wind and with mobile supplies, could not be validated as a world record. In 2018, in the Berlin marathon, considered one of the circuits faster of the world, Eliud Kipchoge amazed by stopping the clock at 2:01’39”. The following year, the legendary Kenenisa Bekele was just two seconds away from that same record in one of the cruelest final stretches in history. At that time, records were already falling in pairs with the new Nike carbon plate. Athletes were breaking records at the same rate as complaints of technological doping were rising. Some, in fact, They broke contracts when they understood that they were playing at a disadvantage. With the world’s fastest man in the long distance 99 seconds away from breaking the two-hour barrier, the question of whether we would ever see this milestone was more than repeated. In 2022, Kipchoge managed to get closer and made us dream. He finally exceeded it by one minute and nine seconds. On April 26, 2026, Sabastian Sawe put the flag on the Moon. And Yomif Kejelcha propped it up. Adidas had won the space race with a photo that will go down in history. Since Nike revolutionized the market with the launch of the first Vaporfly, athletics brands went into combustion. Sneakers with carbon plates multiplied, foams softened and became more reactive. The competition arrived and Nike seemed to have fallen behind. Kelvin Kiptum in 2023 proved that we were wrong, that he was the main candidate to break the mythical barrier. He was 35 seconds away from achieving it in the Chicago Marathon but a car accident ended his life a few months later. A few months earlier, Tigst Assefa stopped the clock in a historic 2:11’53” in the Berlin Marathon. He had just shaved almost two minutes off the world record. On his feet, the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro EVO 1. The Nike-Adidas battle is on fire and in 2024 Ruth Chepngetich, dressed by Nike, becomes the first woman in history to beat 2 hours and 10 minutes. The following year, Chepngetich is sanctioned for doping but it does not affect this record. This same year in Barcelona, Fotyen Tesfay manages to go under two hours and 11 minutes and Adidas also already has the second fastest mark in the history of the women’s marathon. But the final blow was given yesterday. Only two men have gone under two hours in a conventional marathon. They both wear Adidas. From the Vaporfly to the Adizero Adios Pro EVO 3 When Nike first released the Vaporfly, all hell broke loose. Not only among the more or less amateur public, athletes verified on the spot that their shoes were not up to par with those of the Oregon brand. Until its arrival, competition shoes had been standardized in minimal profiles and low drop (the difference in height between the front and rear area). The Vaporfly blew up what was known until then. Impossible heights for the time, very soft foams and zero “feel” of the asphalt for feet accustomed to always being close to the ground. However, for some reason, they worked. The improvement was quickly attributed to the carbon plate but the plate is only one of the pieces that make the whole work. Although it was directly attributed to the plate, the truth is that that sensation of “catapult” and extreme rebound of the foot was the result of using a supercritical foam with a lot of return. In fact, the carbon served to structure the shoe and give stability to the foot. Javi Moro, head of material at the magazine Corridorexplains that these foams “are very light and have a great capacity to retain and return energy” but emphasizes that they really have not changed much in general. “They have changed the curvatures of the plate and the midsoles to generate more rocker effect,” he explains, although he emphasizes that it is more as a means to adapt to all types of audiences “because not all runners tolerate the same type of plate in the same way.” This swing is more pronounced as brands have sought the limits of the regulations. World Athletic, which organizes major events and certifies the tests and the validity of the results, prevents competition with shoes whose height between the ground and the support of the insole exceeds 40 mm. But brands play with “where” those measurements are taken (at two specific points, heel and midfoot) to play with the geometries and try to put more foam … Read more

The problem is that China has taken note

In the middle of World War II, several neutral merchant ships crossing the Atlantic were intercepted and diverted to British ports without being sunk, where specialized judges They decided their destiny weeks later. That almost bureaucratic process converted each capture in a legal matter as well as military. The return of a buried law. Last week we count how the capture of the ship M/V Touska by the United States in the Gulf of Oman, an action that has returned to the foreground a legal tool that had been out of the real debate for decades: the right of prey. This mechanism allows intercepting and, if is legally validatedappropriating civilian ships in the context of war, something that had not been applied in a relevant way since the mid-20th century. The operation is not limited to a specific military action, it introduces a change in how control over maritime trade can be exercised in an open conflict. What it really means. This legal framework is activated only in war situations and establishes that a ship can be captured if you violate a locktransports material useful to the enemy or refuses to be inspected. After capture, the ship is taken to a port under the control of the captor and subjected to a specific judicial process. Finally, if the court considers that the seizure is legitimate, the ship and its cargo pass into the hands of the State that intercepted it, turning a naval operation into a tool with direct economic consequences. How it was used in the past. During World War II, these types of regulations were part from normal operation of naval warfare. The powers involved intercepted merchant ships on the high seas to prevent supply to the enemyespecially on strategic Atlantic routes. Many of these ships were taken to controlled ports and subjected to prize courts, which decided whether they should be confiscated, released or destroyed. The system allowed the opponent to be weakened no need to sink all ships, integrating the legal dimension into military strategy. The British ship HMS Blanche towing the French frigate Pique, after having captured it Aiming beyond Iran. It happens, chow we explainthat the case of Touska acquires greater relevance due to its journey and its connections. Your route from Asia to Iranwith stops in Chinese ports, has introduced a third actor into the equation, elevating the significance of the capture. In fact and as trump hintedthe possibility that it was transporting material linked to China has turned the operation into a broader message about controlling trade routes in a war environment, where each interception can have additional diplomatic implications. From blocking to economic tool. Applying this framework not only allows stopping traffic to a country, it also opens the door to appropriate resources that circulate in that system. This introduces an additional incentive into naval warfare and modifies the behavior of external actors. Who is it? From shipping companies, to insurers and states that operate on these routes, they must recalculate risks, which can translate in route changesincreased costs and greater uncertainty in international trade. Notice to sailors. There is no doubt, the immediate impact extends beyond the captured ship. The possibility of losing an entire ship, along with its cargo, changes perception of risk for operators who until now moved in a more predictable terrain. Countries that offer flags of convenience or companies that work in gray areas may find themselves dragged into complex legal processeswhich adds pressure to avoid any links to routes or destinations under blockage. The boomerang effect. Not only that. He United States movement It introduces a dynamic that it does not completely control, because by recovering this doctrine, it establishes a precedent that other actors can use in future scenarios. Here are names of powers with great maritime and commercial capacity, like chinawhich have the necessary volume to apply similar measures if the context allows it. This opens a new potential front where the maritime interdiction It can escalate beyond a regional conflict. The sea as a battlefield. Ultimately, the Touska case marks something deeper than the capture of a single vessel. It signals a possible transition towards a model where naval warfare combines military force and legal tools of the past to influence global trade. In that scenario where “pirate” jargon seems have a revivaleach operation is no longer isolated and becomes part of a chain of decisions that can be replicated in different parts of the planet, expanding the scope of conflicts and giving a twist to what was understood by the rules of the game at sea. Image | NAVCENT Public Affairs, Robert Dodd In Xataka | Now we know that the Iranian Air Force did to the US what Ukraine could not do to Russia with drones: an abysmal hole In Xataka | If the war resumes again, the US runs a risk unprecedented in the history of war: that the only one with missiles will be Iran.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.