Cut

It serves companies both to cut back and to expand

by

Asha Sharma, new CEO of Xbox, announced this week the dismissal of 1,600 people from its division. It is the first tranche of a plan that foresees more cuts, up to 3,200, this year. Three days later, the US Federal Reserve announced his appointment to a group that advises on “employment and productivity in the age of AI.” Black moon emoji. She is accompanied by Marc Andreesse and a Stanford economist who works with Anthropic. The irony: whoever has just decided what work is left over in their company will now have an opinion on what work is left over, in general. The numbers that Sharma presented in your statement are incontestable: Xbox has lost 64 cents for every dollar invested in small, independent studios, with margins three to ten times worse than any comparable business. But the statement says, almost in the same sentence, that these positions are not taken away by AI, and that the company reorients people and investment towards its AI priorities. The staff is told one thing. To the investor, the opposite. And here is the almond tree trick: AI has become the perfect alibi. It serves to justify both the more aggressive expansion of one company and the more honest surrender of another.. It no longer describes a technology. It is an absolution of universal validity. The pattern is repeated everywhere, always with the same verb: reorient, never replace. Amazon: 16,000 layoffs in its second round in three months, on top of another 14,000 in October, while it puts 200,000 million into AI infrastructure this year. Goal: 10% of the workforce out while spending on data centers skyrockets. Google: has quietly emptied part of Cloud (including the unit that sells cybersecurity as an argument for trusting its cloud) claiming that “we must reinvest in growth areas, such as AI.” Cloudflare: 1,100 out “preparing for the agentic era.” The dismissal itself no longer says much. The clue is where they get the money from: they do not cut where the AI ​​already does the work, but where the business has a worse multiple, less future story. The AI ​​does not execute the layoff, but decides which division survives the scissors. And it is not even the same movement in all cases. SAP has frozen hiring to finance its “significant bet on AI” while Its stock has plummeted 49% in one yearits CEO has said that he doesn’t know if in two or three years anyone in his company will still be programming. Intel has done just the opposite: it admits that it is no longer among the top 10 in the sector, that it is late against NVIDIA, and it fires 20% to retreat to on-device AI, away from data centers. You bet everything. The other gives up. They both call it the same: “AI strategy”. It will be or it will be. But the label does not describe what is going to happen, but rather what needs to be said today so that no one keeps asking. STMicroelectronics announced 2,800 departures within a plan that started in 2024, just before “IA” was the joker universal and yet the press release found space to mention it. The restructuring would have come the same. The label is new. What these companies buy with their layoffs is not, yet, the productivity that AI promises. It is credit against a market that In June it punished Microsoft with its worst month since the dotcom bubblefor not seeming committed enough, for having only thrown one ball into the matter and not both. Layoff is the entry toll to continue telling the story that the technology is going to work. And there is a place where this story meets flesh and blood: in Bethesda, HR ordered the removal of a small memorial that the colleagues themselves had left with photos of those fired. It did not fit into the environment that the company wanted to project.. So the next time someone tells you that they fire “because of AI”, or that they don’t fire “because of AI”, the question we should ask ourselves is who decides what counts as a healthy business, when the diagnosis is signed by whoever benefits from it. In Xataka | GPT-5.6 is probably the best AI model in the world. And precisely for that reason, the majority does not need it. Featured image | Xataka

The US taught that access to advanced AI can be cut off. China is studying the same thing, according to Reuters, and Europe is watching from the outside

by

When the United States activated export controls which ended up leading Anthropic to deactivate Fables 5 and Mythos 5 For all its users, a reality that was difficult to ignore was exposed: access to advanced AI may be cut off. Not because the model disappears, nor because it stops working technically, but because a national security decision can convert an available tool into a conditioned capability. Things have changed slightly since then: controls on Fable lifted after new safeguards and Mythos was limited to a few trusted American organizations, but the precedent is still there. Now that question returns from the other side of the board. Reuters reports that Chinese authorities have held meetings over the last month with the country’s major technology companies to study possible restrictions on foreign access to their most advanced AI models, including some that have not yet been launched. Alibaba, ByteDance and Z.ai participated in those meetings, according to three people familiar with the conversations. At the moment there is no approved measure, no fixed calendar, nor definitive scope. Perhaps more revealing, Beijing is discussing how far it wants to open up its most advanced AI products. What was discussed in those meetings goes beyond closing an API or limiting access to a specific product. According to the agency, participants talked about putting limits on the most advanced models, both closed and more open versions, and also about toughening the consequences for what they call leaks or thefts of proprietary AI technology. One of the sources consulted indicated that these leaks could be treated as crimes linked to China’s strict national security law. New restrictions were also raised on who can fund domestic AI startups. Advanced AI enters the logic of strategic control There are several reasons why what was mentioned does not remain solely within Chinese borders. Since the emergence of DeepSeek R1, remember, AI developed in China has gained ground outside the country thanks to a very attractive combination for many companies: low costs and increasing capabilities. Alibaba has Qwen, ByteDance features Doubao and Z.ai has attracted attention in Silicon Valley with GLM-5.2a model that comes close to leading American offerings at a fraction of the cost. If Beijing limits that access, many businesses and users could find themselves with fewer options and, presumably, higher bills. The Chinese AI sector also seems interested in developing cybersecurity-oriented systems equivalent or superior to those in the United States. Zhou Hongyi, founder of 360, a cybersecurity company with weight among government and enterprise clients, has said that China needs to develop its own Mythos. The company came to present Tulongfeng as a Chinese response to that type of system, stating that it is capable of detecting a large number of vulnerabilities. This is where the most delicate part of the debate appears when viewed from Europe. When the Anthropic case brought to the table the possibility that access to American models would be conditioned by Washington, some raised the Chinese models as a possible alternative: cheaper, increasingly capable and, in certain cases, available through API or with open weights. The new information from Reuters introduces an important nuance in that reading. Changing suppliers can reduce costs or open up new technical options, but does not eliminate the dependency if the critical capacity continues to live under a foreign jurisdiction. Europe, moreover, had already been thinking about this kind of risk before Anthropic and China occupied the center of the discussion. The Commission has defended the need to reduce dependencies on cloud, artificial intelligence and semiconductors, and has linked that agenda with the autonomy and digital resilience of the continent. In that discussion, Brussels has come to warn of the risk of “kill switches”: the possibility that a foreign supplier or a government with the ability to pressure can interrupt essential technological services. That is why Europe looks from the outside. The United States preserves some of the most advanced models in the world and has already made it clear that access to them may be conditioned by a political or national security decision. China, for its part, has gained ground with cheaper and increasingly capable modelsand now I would be studying my own restrictions. The Old Continent is in another place: it has regulation, sovereign ambition and promising companies, but it does not yet seem to have an equivalent in commercial weight, global adoption and strategic capacity to the products that today set the technological bar. Images | Xataka with Nano Banana | Arthur Wang In Xataka | Alibaba’s Qwen AI model is the new crown jewel. The only problem is that they don’t make money from it.

the “digestion cut” does not exist and science is clear why

by

There are some very ‘mother’ phrases that are very well ingrained in our minds and without a doubt one of them is the obligation to wait strictly two hours after eating before entering the pool or the beach. Under the pretext of ‘digestion cut‘, there are many children (and also adults) who have to wait before taking a dip for fear of drowning. However, this is a myth. A popular fable. The concept of “digestion cut” It is not something that is included in the different medical guides nor is it categorized by the WHO as an existing disease. And this is what specialist societies such as the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians also point out, whose expert Ángel Jimeno Aranda clearly points out that cutting digestion is a popular term: It really has nothing to do with digestion, although it is true that when you feel so bad after suddenly entering cold water, you begin to have a headache, blurred vision, fatigue, nausea, vomiting or abdominal pain. The symptoms have caused this popular belief that the problem has a digestive origin, but it has nothing to do with digestion. It is more of a vascular process What really happens. If the ‘digestion cut’ does not exist, then… What happens? The answer lies in immersion syndrome, also technically called hydrocution or thermodifferential shock. This phenomenon is triggered when there is a large temperature difference between a bather’s skin and the water, usually when the latter is below 27°C or there is a thermal difference equal to or greater than 5 °C with respect to body temperature. In the body, This is instantly detected by the different receptors that begin to send signals to the brain to provoke an uncontrolled automatic response characterized by involuntary reflex inspiration, hyperventilation and severe cardiac arrhythmias that can lead to immediate drowning, regardless of the state of digestion. So, as we see, it is a completely vascular problem and has nothing to do with having had a sandwich just before going to the restaurant. Matches the food. Despite being a myth, the historical relationship between eating and immersion syncope has a hemodynamic explanation, since during the time after eating, the body redistributes blood flow to the areas that need it most, which at that time is the stomach to be able to digest. This means that there is not as much blood in other parts of the body. In this way, if a person is suddenly immersed in cold water in the middle of the digestive process, and especially if they have been in the sun, the body executes massive peripheral vasoconstriction to contain the heat in the body. Literally, there is a clash between the stomach’s demand for blood and this constricting response, which generates a conflict of signals for our brain, which does not know who to give priority to. The result It is nothing more than hyperstimulation of the vagus nerve that produces a drop in heart rate and also blood pressure. And lowering pressure is not good news because it generates cerebral hypoperfusion, resulting in dizziness, nausea, loss of vision and, in the worst case, syncope. The reality. With all this data it has become quite clear that waiting 2 clock hours after eating to bathe is false, since the determining factor is not the time, but the method of entering the water and the temperature difference. If we look at it from another perspective, if we talk about warm water, this is something almost impossible to happen, even if we have just eaten. The recommendations The steps to follow focus on entering the water slowly, allowing the skin receptors to acclimatize to the temperature to which we are exposing them, first wetting the extremities, the back of the neck and the abdomen. In addition, sudden changes must be avoided after physical exercise or sunstroke, since the body temperature here will be very high and can be a problem regardless of whether the stomach is full or empty. Images | Callum Hill In Xataka | It is increasingly common to find jellyfish on Mediterranean beaches before summer. And it’s a bad sign

cut mountains in half

by

Tunnels have saved us from hours of detours into mountains and rocky surfaces for decades. However, it is not the only technique to shorten time and develop new roads that connect cities with each other. In this regard, it is worth telling how China once again demonstrates its ability to transform the landscape with a technique that seems straight out of a science fiction movie: literally cut mountains in half to build roads. Explosives, giant excavators and millimeter planning are what is needed to divide rock formations hundreds of meters high. How the technique works. After a geological study Thoroughly determining the composition of the mountain and planning cuts so that they do not compromise the stability of the terrain, engineers use controlled explosives to create the first fractures, followed by specialized heavy machinery that can dig tens of meters deep per day. The remaining walls are stabilized with metal mesh, shotcrete and drainage systems to prevent slipping. Although it is also true that there is not a single clean pit, since the usual thing is to excavate in phases, in terraces or stepped benches that open from top to bottom. The final result is a clean passage through the mountainwith vertical walls up to 200 meters high that look like someone with a giant knife has gone through them. A technique in multiple regions of China. These ‘cut walls’ can be seen mainly in the mountainous provinces of GuizhouYunnan and Sichuan, where karst terrain and complicated rock formations made traditional tunnel construction impractical. High-profile projects such as the Guiyang-Qianxi Highway or the Taihang Mountain Pass have turned hours-long journeys into minutes-long journeys. It has also been used in the construction of the high speed railway that connects Beijing with Guangzhou, where several sections cross mountains literally split in half. The last great example: Huajiang. The most recent and spectacular case is once again in Guizhou, within the S57 Liuzhi-Anlong highway, where these cutting techniques coexist with one of the most ambitious bridges ever built. The Huajiang Canyon Bridge opened on September 28, 2025 and was presented by China Railway (CREC) as the highest bridge in the world by distance between the roadway and the river, with a height of 625 meters, a length of 2,890 meters and a main span of 1,420 meters. According to China Dailyreduces the canyon crossing from about an hour to just two minutes. Click on the image to see the video Why are tunnels not used?. The decision to cut rather than drill often comes due to technical criteria and specific economics. In terrain with a high concentration of groundwater or unstable rock formations, building tunnels can be more expensive and risky than direct cutting. Additionally, maintenance of an open passage is considerably easier than that of a tunnel, which requires constant ventilation, lighting and drainage systems. In low-lying mountains, cutting also allows for the greater proliferation of heavy vehicles, especially in an economy so dependent on road freight transportation. Beyond China. Although China has perfected and popularized this technique, it is not the only country that uses it. Norway uses similar methods in its fjords, where the characteristics of the terrain make cutting more viable than drilling (although in this country we also have spectacular tunnel projects under construction such as Rogfast). In the United States, the Cumberland Gap Pass in the Appalachians was created using cutting techniques, although on a smaller scale. However, no country matches the ambition and scale of Chinese projects, which have turned mountain cutting into an art. Environmental impact. Although the benefits of using this technique are evident, especially in the aspect of economic development and its effectiveness in connecting remote regions, this technique also generates some debate. around the environmental impact. And this type of construction can end up destroying local ecosystems, altering natural drainage patterns or fragmenting wildlife habitats, not to mention the amount of dust and noise during its construction that can generate millions of tons of waste. It should also be said that it is not the most used technique, since tunnels continue to be the preference except in exceptional cases. Cover image | Zhang Meifang and r/Damnthatsinteresting In Xataka | China has just inaugurated its longest underwater tunnel: 11 kilometers, LEDs everywhere and 1.5 billion investment

They are perfect if you are looking to save and cut a subscription

by

Spotify, HBO Max, and Apple TV are just three of the subscriptions I pay for religiously every month. The usual thing happens here: just one costs little, but when you start adding them up, the monthly expense hurts your pocket. For this reason, I have been thinking about cutting some subscriptions for a while, but it is difficult because, although it may seem like not, I use them all. So the solution is to look for a two-in-one subscription that allows me to remove at least one of them. This is somewhat complicated on streaming platforms, although not so much in tools that I use on a daily basis. I’ve had separate cloud storage and a VPN for a while now, but, Why not get a service that includes both? For this reason, there are three services that comply with this and have convinced me. Internxt The first option that includes both services is Internxt, a company of Spanish origin. It is a secure cloud storage service with end-to-end encryption, so not even the company itself can access your data. Besides, It is open sourceso anyone can audit it through GitHub, ensuring transparency. Its three plans include storage and VPN. The cheapest starts at 9.99 euros per month, although if we use the code ‘XATAKA’, the first month will cost only 1.57 euros. In exchange, we will have 1 TB of cloud storageencrypted VPN and, incidentally, antivirus. Internxt – One month trial The price could vary. We earn commission from these links NordVPN With NordVPN we go in the opposite direction: it is a VPN that includes cloud storage in some of its plans. It is one of the best VPNs currently available, offering a service that, in addition to being very secure, is also fast and with more than 9,400 servers spread around the world. Plus, with just one account, you can have VPN on up to 10 devices. In order to have cloud storage with NordVPN, we need to choose the ‘Full’ plan or the ‘Ultra’ plan. The first is the most economical and includes, in addition to 1 TB of cloud storageandpassword manager and protection against fraudulent calls. If we take their monthly plan, the price is 18.19 eurosalthough the most economical way in the long term is to choose their 24-month plan: that way, per month it will only cost us 4.79 euros. NordVPN Full Monthly Plan (2-year plan) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Proton Finally, we have Proton. It is another European service that has several different tools such as email, VPN or cloud storage, among others. We have the possibility of contracting some of these separately, but in this case the subscription that interests us is Proton Unlimited. Because? Because basically It is a service that encompasses everything. This subscription includes, in addition to a VPN (which is also considered one of the best), 500 GB of cloud storage, the possibility of having up to 15 encrypted email addresses, a password manager and even office tools to create and edit text documents or spreadsheets. Its price is 12.99 euros per month, although if we choose its annual subscription, the price drops to 9.99 euros per month. Proton Unlimited (one year) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Štefan ŠtefančíkInternxt, Proton, NordVPN In Xataka | Google Drive alternatives: the best cloud storage services for your files In Xataka | Best VPNs 2026: guide with the 17 best services to protect your online privacy

Amazon wanted its employees to continue using AI. They have just cut their losses by asking that “you do not use AI just for the sake of using it”

by

Amazon wanted to force its employees They will use AI as if there were no tomorrow. It implemented a tool that measured that usage, but after a few weeks the company realized something: people were using AI for absurd and worthless tasks. That has made Amazon make a decision forceful: abandon this initiative completely. what has happened. Amazon has had to cancel an experiment that measured the performance of its employees based on their use of corporate AI tools. The reason is simple: the engineers had begun to cheat and took the opportunity to automate completely useless and redundant tasks with the sole objective of climbing positions in the ranking. The labor scam has also absurdly increased the computing and infrastructure costs of the company itself, so the experiment has failed. The controversial Kirorank. The service in question was a scoreboard internally named Kirorank. It measured the activity of Amazon developers within Kiro, the “Claude Code of Amazon.” Amazon management wanted 80% of its programmers to use AI every week, an ambitious goal. What the developers ended up doing to score points with their bosses was deploying autonomous agents based on MeshClaw —the version of OpenClaw from Amazon—so that they would run processes in a loop and devour tokens for almost no purpose. The era of tokenmaxxing. Amazon Senior Vice President Dave Treadwell had to intervene this week before the staff to announce that developers no longer had to use this tool. Although he admitted that the experiment had originally been designed with “good intentions,” the practical result ended up being an economic hole due to the tokenmaxxingthat newly coined term that defines the action of artificially inflating the consumption of tokens to simulate productivity. “Please don’t use AI just for the sake of using AI,” the executive demanded of his engineers, urging them to focus on creating better products instead of burning server resources. Cost through the roof. Treadwell’s announcement is no small matter, because this shows that companies have realized that cost control is necessary with AI. Companies like Anthropic—of which Amazon is the largest investor and whose Claude model they use intensively—have recently migrated from flat monthly fees to a per-use pricing model based strictly on token consumption. With this new billing scheme, the fact that the engineers dedicated themselves to “playing” with the bots to rise in the ranking significantly multiplied the bill that Amazon had to pay. Meta suffered the same problem. The Amazon case is not an isolated event. In the Meta and Microsoft offices identical situations have been experiencedwith employees sabotaging internal AI usage rankings through massive token consumption. The irony for Amazon is tremendous: the company has been executing waves of massive layoffs to cut costs and be able to finance its gigantic investment plan in data center infrastructure and AI. Your theoretical capex for 2026 It is estimated at 200,000 million dollars. Lesson learned: AI must be used well. The failure of this “gamification” of work has ended with Amazon abandoning this experiment. To prevent developers from cheating again, a company team is going to change metrics. Instead of measuring raw token consumption, they will analyze so-called “normalized deployments.” From now on, the goal will be to measure how many times the interaction with AI results in useful lines of code that are truly integrated into the company’s products. In Xataka | Customers demand that a human solve their problem. The surprising thing is that if humans serve them they think they are an AI

Samsung has made a lot of money from the memory crisis and its employees wanted their cut. Result: bonus of $340,000

by

Employees at Samsung’s chip division were in high gear. And it is logical: your company is becoming gold thanks to the rise of data centers for AI. The demand for memory chips is extraordinary and that has caused Samsung’s market capitalization to skyrocket over a billion dollars. The company, yes, was being very selfish, but the threat of a strike He has made her see reason. The bonus of the crisis. Samsung Electronics workers have ratified a multimillion-dollar compensation agreement. One that will see employees of the semiconductor division receive an average bonus estimated at 513 million won (about $340,000). Agreement in extremis. The vote was approved by 74% of members of the majority union, and was closed in extremisbecause there were 90 minutes left before an indefinite strike began that threatened to paralyze this giant’s supply chains. The risk was too high. This agreement avoids a scenario that would have been catastrophic for the AI ​​industry. Samsung is the largest memory chip manufacturer in the worldand its modules power everything from mobile phones and electric vehicles to the GPUs used in AI data centers. Considering that the market is already stressed by the memory crisis and demand that far exceeds supply, adding this bottleneck would have had unforeseeable consequences. Only Saudi Aramco surpasses Samsung in estimated operating profits for 2026. Source: Bloomberg. Memory chips are pure gold. Samsung is on its way to close one of the most profitable years in its history, and its semiconductor division already indicated that its profits had multiplied by 48 in the first quarter of the year, an absolutely extraordinary figure. She is not the only one taking advantage of this phenomenon: SK Hynix and Micron They have broken the trillion-dollar market capitalization barrier for the first time. Some so much and others so little. Although the agreement has avoided a logistical disaster, it has also caused a very uncomfortable situation internally. The bonuses are linked to the financial performance of each business unit, which means that the 28,000 members of the chip division have benefited significantly, but the rest of the company has not. The differences are clear: Engineers in that division will receive bonuses of up to 600 million won ($400,000). They will share 40% of the total allocated as bonuses. Personnel in divisions such as home appliances or telephony will receive a testimonial bonus of just 6 million won ($4,000). They share 60% of the bonus, but there are many more in number, about 260,000 in total. The average salary of Samsung employees in 2025 was 158 million won (about $105,000) according to internal company information published in March. Unions divided. This asymmetry of 100 to 1 has caused great tensions to appear between departments, and this has also been noted in the negotiation and conversations in the union. While the majority bloc (which included the majority of workers in the semiconductor division) supported the agreement with more than 80% of the votes, the secondary union, which brings together employees from other divisions, rejected the document with only 21% of votes in favor. TM Roh takes action. The situation is so worrying that TM Roh, head of the device division, has sent an internal statement to try to calm things down. He has admitted that the results of the negotiation have left thousands of employees feeling “alienated, dispossessed and hurt by the company.” Top management has promised to monitor the conditions of each unit, but while Samsung has managed to control the chaos in its factories, it could have an even more disturbing problem on its hands. Image | Wikimedia Commons (Choi Kwang-mo), IntelUnsplash (Liam Briese) In Xataka | Samsung has just achieved a milestone that has not been recorded for eight years. The problem is that it is a mirage

Europe has been depending on Amazon, Google and Microsoft for its most critical data for years. You are about to cut off their access

by

The European Commission is taking action. This organization is expected to present its “Technological Sovereignty Package” on May 27. This directive will include a series of measures aimed at boosting the EU’s strategic autonomy in sensitive areas, and that means something unique: stopping depending as much as possible on US hyperscalers to store critical data. The fear of the off button. The measures are being applied due to growing political instability and some recent cases that have demonstrated the power that the US has over the European technological infrastructure. In May Microsoft “cancelled” the email of Karim Khan, a prosecutor who had been directly cited in an executive order from Donald Trump. Microsoft he denied itbut the damage had already been done, and these problems have raised fears that Trump could use a kind of “off button” against European institutions that depend on the hardware and software infrastructure provided by companies like Microsoft, Google or Amazon. Legal espionage. The CLOUD Act (Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act) is a 2018 US law that allows law enforcement to force US-based technology companies (such as Google, Microsoft or Amazon) to provide data, regardless of where it is stored, whether inside or outside the United States. This law updates the Stored Communications Act to prioritize data control over its location. Or what is the same: if you use the services of US hyperscalers, the US may end up accessing your data. And since you’ve accepted their terms of use, you agree to let them legally spy on you if they “need to.” If you want my critical data, you’ll have to protect it. The new regulations require service providers who want to work with critical European data to demonstrate that they are not subject to requests from non-EU governments. This automatically excludes Microsoft, Google or Amazon, because all three are subject to the CLOUD Act. Europe is thus looking for providers that guarantee that critical data will not be in the possession of companies that then have to transfer it to foreign powers. Europe depends on the American cloud. The reality is that today Amazon (AWS), Microsoft (Azure) and Google (Google Cloud) currently control more than 70% of the Cloud Computing market in the old continent. Losing these institutional contracts would mean a significant financial blow, but it also sends a powerful signal to European private companies: if Brussels does not trust the US with its secrets, why should European corporations? The domino effect could be huge. Europe has its own clouds. This directive would give an important opportunity to initiatives that seemed stalled like GAIA-Xbut there are also companies with their own infrastructure such as OVH (France) or T-Systems (Germany). There are significant technical challenges in that area, because US hyperscalers have been refining their offering over the past two decades. However, Brussels seems willing to accept a somewhat less efficient or complete service in exchange for greater autonomy. The options existno doubt, but the challenge is enormous. Migrating is going to be expensive. It is one thing to make the decision and quite another to complete that migration that will require moving decades of data and systems to a different infrastructure. Current data centers would have to be expanded to meet demand, they say some analysisand that would mean a cost of between 14,000 and 24,000 million euros. Consulting companies like Forrester they don’t see anything clear that the EU can achieve cloud sovereignty, and other experts also make it clear that Europe will not abandon the hyperscalers. Traceability. In addition to changing suppliers, the board also wants to impose strict requirements regarding transparency. AI systems that have access to that data must be auditable by the newly created EU AI Office. The Commission wants to know who has access to the code, who maintains the servers and who has the technical capacity to manage and even intercept such data transfers. Data too sensitive. In comments to CNBCEU officials explained that there are active debates demanding that financial, judicial or health data used at the government level and in the public sector have a sovereign cloud infrastructure. That’s also true for military data, of course, and There are already movements in that direction. Fragmented Internet. The move confirms that the world appears to be heading toward a future with a fragmented internet and one that will have important geopolitical boundaries. While the US tries to defend its technology against China, Europe and the entire world are trying to avoid or at least mitigate their excessive dependence on American technological solutions. Image | İsmail Enes Ayhan and François Genon In Xataka | Europe no longer trusts Google. That is why several start-ups are designing an independent payment system on Android

The countdown begins for companies to cut their working hours

by

May 1 was celebrated as Labor Day, but Mexico did much more than that on that day full of symbolism: it began its path towards reduction of working hours of 40 hours with the entry into force of the law regulating the length of the day labor. The change promoted by President Claudia Sheinbaum’s party does not represent a sudden change, but with the entry into force of the reform secondary working day opens an adaptation process for companies to modify the organization of their working hours to the new regulations. From 48 to 40 hours in four steps. Mexico part of one of the work days longest in the world according to dOECD data. The current legal limit is 48 hours per week, a ceiling that has not moved since 1917. However, the reform seeks to lower it in stages until it reaches 40 hours per week: on January 1, 2027 the maximum limit will be 46 hours; It will drop to 44 hours a week in 2028, to 42 in 2029 and, finally, it will be set at 40 hours a week by 2030. Every year, two hours less. The first step expires on January 1, 2027, which leaves companies room until that date to reorganize shifts, contracts and processes. All this without the workers see their salaries or benefits reduced current, something that itself Federal Labor Law expressly prohibits. The duties that the reform brings. The publication of the labor reform Mexican not only activated the calendar. The new legislation establishes as an employer’s obligation to keep an electronic record of the working day, which in Mexico is popularly known as a time clock. That obligation comes into force on January 1, 2027 and It is not a simple procedure. The Ministry of Labor and Social Security (STPS) will have access to this data to verify that the working hours are truly respected. Penalties for not having the registration in order they are already set and range between 29,327 and 586,550 pesos (between 1,431 euros and 28,624 euros at the exchange rate), equivalent to between 250 and 5,000 times the Unit of Measurement and Update. In addition, the STPS must develop mechanisms to collect and evaluate data on how the reduction in working hours is applied. Most companies have not yet moved. The diagnosis of the real state of preparation of companies is not encouraging. The data from a study from EY published by Yucatan Diary with 165 companies in Mexico reveals that 72.7% are in what the analysts themselves call “tactical paralysis”: they know the details of the change of day, they have followed it closely, but they have not yet taken any concrete steps towards its application. Only 18% of companies consider that they are really prepared to apply the new labor regulations. As explained Yeshua Gómez, associate partner of People Advisory Services at EY México to Expansion“companies are not waiting because they do not understand the reform. They are waiting because they do not know how much it will cost them to implement it.” 85% identify cost as the main obstacle to starting to take action, while 71% recognize that they regularly depend on overtime to sustain their daily operations. For these companies, the challenge is not to spend 48 to 46 hours on paper, but to do it from real days that already frequently exceed the 48-hour limit. More limited working hours, but with more overtime. The reform has also modified the definition of the working day, establishing the daytime workday at a maximum of eight hours, the nighttime workday at seven hours, and the mixed workday could reach seven and a half hours. The only (and important) exception to this rule is that the day could be extended due to extraordinary circumstances. This overtime, on the other hand, is also gradually extended: up to 9 hours during 2026 and 2027, 10 hours in 2028, 11 hours for 2029 and a maximum of 12 hours for 2030. The objective is that the transition to the change in working hours does not suddenly hit the sectors most dependent on extra work, and to offer them tools to optimize the working day of their employees, even if it is at the cost of pay up to three times more expensive every extra hour. In Xataka | Mexico has an ambitious plan to be the tenth economy in the world and that involves technology: semiconductors Image | Unsplash (Jesus Herrera, Kaden Taylor)

Ryanair will cut 1.2 million seats in Spain but there is one region that will suffer more than the rest: Galicia

by

Ryanair will reduce seats, cancel routes and raise ticket prices. That is the strategy that the company envisions for Spain during next summer. And Eddie Wilson has confirmed a strategy that has been talked about since last October when the CEO of Ryanair already threatened to take more flights from Spain if the situation did not change with Aena’s rates. And one autonomous community is feeling it more than the rest. 1.2 million seats. That will be the cut that Ryanair has prepared for our country next summer. It is something that was already reported in October and was confirmed last Monday. Counterscheduling the distribution of Aena dividends among its partners, Eddie Wilson has taken the opportunity to point out that its activity will be reduced in Spain in just a few months. They do so because the Government takes advantage of “(Aena’s) monopoly position in Spain’s main airports, obtaining excessive margins of 60% at the expense of local economies, which depend on affordable air travel for tourism and employment.” Without a change in airport taxesRyanair confirms that it is withdrawing flights in our country and that it will replace seats in larger airports. The reason is the repeated one in the last months of this Government-Ryanair battle: They consider that Aena’s rates at regional airports are too high. Once again, regional airports. According to the company, Aena’s airport taxes in regional spaces are uncompetitive and a burden on tourism and the economy of these cities. This has caused, according to the company, its departure from the airports of Asturias, Valladolid, Jerez, Tenerife North and Vigo and its activity to be reduced by 79% in Santiago compared to the summer 2024 figures. Not only that, in addition to this cut in seats, Wilson has not hesitated to warn that if the price of jet fuel becomes scarce, the first victims will be the regional airports, prioritizing the large seats. What about Galicia? Although Ryanair claims that its departure is fatally damaging the less frequented Spanish airports, the truth is that not all of them are suffering the same fate. A good example is Zaragoza. Compared to 2024, it will have 45% fewer seats, three routes canceled and two others cut. Despite this, Aena data They say that in 2025 the number of passengers grew by 1.9% (especially on domestic routes) and that in 2026 it is growing by 2.6%. Photography is very different in Galicia. So far this year, A Coruña airport is the only one that has grown. Without Ryanair, Vigo is falling 3.4% this year but the most worrying thing is in Santiago. At this airport, Ryanair has cut its activity by almost 80% compared to the summer of two years ago. In 2025 it has already fallen by 14.3% and this year it is falling by 29.6%. The lower activity at this airport has caused flights in the region to fall by 6.9% last year and so far this year this has worsened to 15.5%. There is only one worse fact. From all regions, Galicia is the one with the worst figures. And so far this year, only Castilla y León has lost more travelers, with a drop of 18.6%. However, its volume of travelers is much lower than that of Galicia. In the first three months of 2025, 40,051 people moved by plane in the region, while this year 32,613 passengers did so. That’s a drop of less than 8,000 seats filled. In Galicia, however, so far this year 987,812 passengers have taken a plane, while in 2025 a total of 1,168,745 people had taken a plane. That is, in the first quarter of the year, 180,933 passengers have been lost in the first quarter of 2026. And more than 200,000 passengers compared to 2024 when more than 1,194,032 people moved by plane in the first three months of the year. Not only the rates. When Ryanair announces that it is leaving an airport, it usually points to airport taxes, but the reality is more complex. The truth is that the company has maintained some commercial routes with low demand because it had advertising contracts that supported its routes. Contracts that he has not hesitated to break, as in Vigowhen you have found more juicy economic incentives like those that have arrived from Morocco. It must be taken into account thatthe launch of the AVE to Galicia It has also been a hard blow for airline companies that have seen how part of their customers move to the train since it offers more affordable rates and travel times that, adding the waits at airports, are similar to those of the plane. In fact, companies like Iberia have also reduced their supply because demand did not compensate for the effort. Photo | Left Victorian and Simone Muzzi In Xataka | The new EU border system is leaving people without flights. Ryanair has a solution: close check-in early

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.