Will Kerr, VP of new products at Dyson

How is one of the most innovative hardware companies in the world managed? In a market as fierce as that of vacuum cleaners due to brand saturation, competition and price wars, the British multinational Dyson has begun a profound strategic restructuring to try to avoid the evils that threaten the technology sector: dependence on a single product, the loss of operational agility and the dosage of launches. We traveled to their Singapore headquarters to delve into their laboratories and speak with Will Kerrvice president of New Product Development, about his clear commitment to diversification, the past and the brand’s ambitious vision for the future. Where is Dyson now? On the old continent (geographically speaking) there are few technology companies that are a reference in the sector, but Dyson is one of them. In fact, it is great in technological prestige and billing: in 2025 it entered 6,130 million poundswith an EBITDA of 1,110 million (up 18%) and launched 13 new products, more than ever in a single year. However, if we talk about staff and structure, it is still relatively small for the money it moves: its global staff is made up of only 14,000 people. However, its strong point is its own R&D. Of course, the Dyson that James Dyson founded in 1991 has nothing to do with the current one: its fiscal headquarters moved to Singapore in 2019 and although its main R&D is still in the United Kingdom, its most iconic products are cooked, tested and developed in the Asian country. And the scenario has also changed: in 2024 its benefits They plummeted 49% despite breaking a product sales record. Last year the company recovered part of its operating muscle, but its turnover is still not what it would be in 2023. Dyson is not a diversified conglomerate, but rather a niche company of small premium appliances. R&D at two speeds and new operating model For Dyson, R&D is an essential area and there they spare no expense. Without going any further, of those 6.13 billion pounds of total revenue in 2025, they invested more than 400 million pounds in R&D. The question is: where to invest when the results can take years to arrive or even never arrive, like the electric car that was left in limbo after more than 500 million pounds investment? Dyson’s amazing electric car For Kerr, the dilemma is “finding the balance of when something is good enough.” They have a team in the UK to provide long-term insights and research, clients pointing out issues and potential improvements, developing key technologies in motors and batteries that have general application across their portfolio. And he gives a clear example: developing the next hair dryer could take five years and be incredible, but there are users who ask for one that is quieter, something that may only require six months of work. Virtue lies in balance. In any case, the process is always the same. Internally, this process is known as the “product creation framework” and the idea is to ensure that meet standards that can never be lowered. They have periodic checkpoints along the way. On each machine, James Dyson is very involved in the day-to-day: “Two weeks ago, we spent seven hours straight in Malaysia without stopping. He has an insatiable enthusiasm for this. And I say this because he interacts directly with the product, detects details and brings his experience of everything he has done.” The Dyson manager says that they always try to make sure that, “even when we do something for the first time, the standards are set uniformly across all categories.” Even so, from the technical direction they naturally admit that they are not always infallible: “It is clear that we never do it perfect the first time.” Without the pressure (from competitors), perhaps we would not be in the excellent state we are in. So that this huge investment does not suffocate the commercial viability of the company, Dyson has structurally separated its operations into two independent phases: “discovery” and “execution” (delivery). In the past, your engineering team worked on ideas and development simultaneously, requiring you to bet too much that new concepts would work. If a project failed, the firm faced periods of one or two years without news in the stores. Kerr explains the reason for this new organization very clearly: “If those new concepts don’t work, suddenly you’re disappointing customers for a year or two because you don’t have a launch. That’s why we’ve separated the two blocks.” Now, the execution team ensures a constant flow of innovation to the market, while the discovery team works free of commercial urgency looking for disruptive ideas. The iRobot mirror and the battle of robotics The recent iRobot bankruptcya pioneer of consumer robotics that sold 50 million units before end up acquired by Asian competitorsmakes it inevitable to think of the phrase: When you see your neighbor’s beards cut…. Or in other words, the need to diversify the catalog becomes evident when observing the international competitive environment. We refer to the facts: a look at the market in different aspiration formats (you can see our buying guides for robot vacuum cleaners and upright vacuum cleaners) makes it clear that the segment speaks Chinese. Meanwhile, Dyson has been expanding into other areas such as hair care or wearables for years. Dyson assures that market pressure is a welcome stimulus: “We see that the sector is moving quickly. It puts pressure on us, but it encourages us to do things more quickly.to look for new partners, new ways of working and new opportunities in the supply chain. Without that pressure, maybe we wouldn’t be in the excellent shape we are in.” We believe that robotics is, if not the future, then certainly an extremely important future. In addition, the firm prefers to ignore the daily noise of the market to focus on its own objectives: “If we woke up every day worried about those competitors, it wouldn’t be … Read more

OpenAI wanted to simplify its AI products. You’ve ended up with a salad of ChatGPT, Atlas and Codex

If you have become accustomed to opening the application ChatGPT and always work from the same place, when you update you may find yourself with a quite different experience. OpenAI is reorganizing its products and, with them, the routines of those who had already turned their solutions into tools for daily use. The move promises to concentrate functions, but it also forces us to understand again which application should be opened, which environment corresponds to each task, and which parts of the previous flow continue to work the same. Three main pieces. The desktop application that we knew is now called ChatGPT Classic, while a new ChatGPT application brings together Chat, Work and Codex in the same environment. At the same time, Atlas enters its countdown: the browser will remain available for a few weeks, but OpenAI has set its withdrawal for August 9, 2026. The company thus concentrates more capabilities under a single brand, although during the transition names, applications and functions that are not obvious at first glance will coexist. They are not three versions of the same ChatGPT. Chat continues to be the space to talk, write, search for information, analyze files or resolve specific queries. Work is designed for longer, multi-stage tasks, such as researching a topic, cross-referencing documents, and preparing reports or presentations. Codex keeps the focus on software development and can work with code, repositories, terminals and other technical tools. All three share an application, but each one responds to a different way of working. The new desktop experience. The changes land on both macOS and Windows. Chat access appears in the left panel next to Work and Codex. When selected, the conversation opens within the general environment, although it can be separated into another window. OpenAI thus retains the most recognizable feature of ChatGPT, but makes it a part of a broader product, with a different organization for those who used the previous application. Atlas, in retreat. OpenAI is moving some of its capabilities to the new app’s built-in browser and to a extension for chrome. The architecture also includes a remote browser from which agents can complete tasks. Anyone who used Atlas as their regular browser will have to prepare for the move: the bookmarks they want to keep can be exported to Chrome, while cookies and passwords can be moved to the new application. Open tabs and browsing history are not transferred automatically. There are alternatives outside. Google is taking Gemini to Chrome itself to understand the open page, summarize content, compare information between multiple tabs, and, in supported accounts, complete multi-step actions. The deployment continues to be limited by region and Spain is not currently among the supported territories. Comet by Perplexitymaintains the browser-agnostic formula and is available on Mac, Windows, Android, iPhone and iPad. Perplexity Pro users can also choose between models from companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. The idea behind the changes. OpenAI wants ChatGPT to stop being just a chatbot and become the gateway to practically its entire ecosystem. Instead of maintaining separate apps for chatting, scheduling, or browsing, concentrate those functions under one brand. The commitment is reminiscent of the evolution of other large technological platforms, which over time have absorbed previously separate tools to reduce fragmentation and turn a single application into the center of the experience. Background. OpenAI wanted to reduce the complexity of the selector with the arrival of GPT-5but encountered users who did not see the models as interchangeable parts. Some depended on GPT-4o for specific jobs; others preferred his creative abilities and his way of conversing. The company backtracked and offered it again to paying users, before permanently removing it from ChatGPT on February 13, 2026. Perhaps in a few months this transition will be easier than it seems today. But the change brings to mind a well-known idea in software design: We don’t just learn to use a tool, we also build habits around it. When these habits are changed suddenly, the adaptation period becomes as much a part of the experience as the new functions. OpenAI’s challenge will be to make the integration easier for the user than the collection of products it aims to replace. Images | OpenAi In Xataka | The new Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1 have a groundbreaking bet: to make 90% of their rivals at 20% of their price

the price of iPads, Macs and more products increases

Just a few days ago, the still CEO of Apple said that Maintaining prices as they were was “unsustainable”. We are in full RAM crisis caused by the shortage generated by AI and the prices of this component are through the roof. It was a matter of time until this situation was reflected in the final price. There are several manufacturers that have warned that prices are going to risesome even They have canceled products for this reason. With AI monopolizing all the components for the data centersit doesn’t look like the situation will be reversed soon. During the interview, Cook did not detail which products would increase in price, but simply said that there would be changes in the catalog. Today we already know who are the first affected and, At the moment, the iPhone is not there, but time to time. This is the statement that Apple has issued about these changes: “The consumer electronics industry is facing an unprecedented challenge. The rapid expansion of AI data centers has caused an extraordinary increase in demand for memory and storage. We have never seen the price of a component rise so much and so quickly. Until now we have protected our customers from these increases, but we have reached a point where we are forced to start raising prices on several products, including today’s increases for the iPad and Mac. We know this is not good news and we are working tirelessly to find solutions”. This is how the new prices look MacBook laptops: up to 19% more expensive The one that comes out worst on this list is the 13-inch MacBook Air, which increases by 230 euros, 19% more expensive. The MacBook Pro M5 Max, which were already the most expensive, go up a whopping 600 euros each. Current base PRICE BASE PRICE BEFORE DIFFERENCE MACBOOK NEO 799 euros 699 euros +100 euros (+14%) MACBOOK AIR (13″) M5 1,429 euros 1,199 euros +230 euros (+19%) MACBOOK AIR (15″) M5 1,729 euros 1,499 euros +230 euros (+15%) MACBOOK PRO (14″) M5 2,229 euros 1,929 euros +300 euros (+16%) MACBOOK PRO (14″) M5 PRO 2,949 euros 2,549 euros +400 euros (+16%) MACBOOK PRO (14″) M5 MAX 4,849 euros 4,249 euros +600 euros (+14%) MACBOOK PRO (16″) M5 pro 3,449 euros 3,049 euros +400 euros (+13%) MACBOOK PRO (16″) M5 max 5,149 euros 4,549 euros +600 euros (+13%) Desktop Mac: up to 31% more The only one that doesn’t come up here is the Mac Mini M4, but because Apple already loaded the base model in its daymeaning it was like a preventive price increase. Of the others, the Mac Studio with the M3 Ultra chip is the one that increases the most: 1,500 euros more. Current base PRICE BASE PRICE BEFORE DIFFERENCE IMAC 1,819 euros 1,519 euros +300 euros (+20%) MAC MINI M4 969 euros 969 euros 0 euros (0%) MAC MINI M4 PRO 1,919 euros 1,719 euros +200 euros (+12%) MAC STUDIO M4 max 3,029 euros 2,329 +700 euros (+30%) MAC STUDIO M3 ultra 6,349 euros 4,849 euros +1,500 euros (+31%) iPad: the cheap model is no longer cheap The iPad with A16 chip, also known as the cheap iPad, now costs 499 euros, 32% more. The rest of the models increase between 14 and 24%. Current base PRICE BASE PRICE BEFORE DIFFERENCE ipad a16 499 euros 379 euros +120 euros (+32%) ipad mini 679 euros 549 euros +130 euros (+24%) iPad air (11″) m4 799 euros 649 euros +150 euros (+23%) iPad air (13″) m4 999 euros 849 euros +150 euros (+18%) iPad pro (13″) m5 1,299 euros 1,099 euros +200 euros (+18%) iPad pro (13″) m5 1,649 euros 1,449 euros +200 euros (+14%) Apple TV and HomePod are not spared either The highest percentage increase of all is seen in the Apple TV 4K, which increases 36% up to 229 euros. HomePod speakers, in both versions, are also more expensive. Current base PRICE BASE PRICE BEFORE DIFFERENCE APPLE TV 4K 229 euros 169 euros +60 euros (+36%) HOMEPOD (2nd GEN.) 399 euros 349 euros +50 euros (+14%) HOMEPOD MINI 139 euros 109 euros +30 euros (+28%) Image | Laurenz Heymann in Unsplash In Xataka | Apple CEO John Ternus: “The most beautifully designed thing most customers own is an Apple product”

China is filling up with products from Russia. The problem is that many of these products come from China itself.

At the beginning of 2025, a more than notable event occurred in China. Apparently, trade tensions between Beijing and the EU had opened a new scenario for Russian livestock farmers. In other words, if Spain had made a fortune exporting pork to China, an unexpected enemy appeared on the horizon: Russia. It seems that the hype of Moscow goes much further than “its” pig, and in 2026 has been maintained. Russian Chinese stores. Yes, in recent years a situation has been occurring that no one saw coming: the proliferation of stores selling Russian products in cities throughout China, generating great interest among consumers. These establishments, easily recognizable by their signs in Cyrillic, traditional Russian music such as Kalinka and Katyusha, and/or the display of iconic products such as matryoshka dolls, offer a variety of products: from national sausages to chocolates, honey, vodka or durian confectionery. Thus, with slogans such as “hardcore products” and a blue and white aesthetic, the stores seek to evoke the essence of Moscow. However, as we will see, behind this facade many are more Chinese than they look. The figures. The boom has also coincided with an increase in commercial ties between China and Russia, driven by Western sanctions on Moscow after its invasion of Ukraine, the same ones that have led to Russian ranchers in the Asian nation. Not only that. Bilateral trade reached historic levels in 2022 and 2023and Chinese consumers responded enthusiastically, seeing these products as a way to show solidarity with Russia. According to data from the Qichacha business registry, In January 2025 there were 3,555 companies registered in China engaged in the trade of Russian productswith 696 and 894 new companies registered in 2023 and 2024, respectively. They are not Russian, they are Chinese. Of course, the boom also raised suspicions. In fact, the boom faced increasing scrutiny last year. Many consumers began to question the authenticity of the products offered. Sausages, for example, cannot be legally imported from Russiaand the durian, a tropical fruit, is not typical of Russian regions as far as we know. This led Chinese authorities to investigate some of these stores. For example in Fujian, where a Russian market was pointed out for promoting false health benefits and labeling domestic foods as imported. In Beijing, similar stores closed after several inspections that required proof of the authenticity of their products. In fact, in 2025 the Shanghai authorities announced investigations against seven of the 47 Russian themed stores of the city, accusing them of misleading customers regarding the origin of their products. Some were closedwhile others faced fines and the obligation to clearly label products…made in China. Finally, a Jiemian News investigation revealed that a large part of the food products in the so-called “Russian State Houses” (franchises with no connection to the Russian government) They were locally produced.. Factors of interest. The initial success of these markets and establishments can be attributed to several factors. On the one hand, consumers’ curiosity and desire to explore “exotic” productssomething that has surely played an important role. On the other hand, the geopolitical narrative surely also did its thing: the war in ukraine and tensions with the West caused some Chinese consumers to view consumption of Russian products as a gesture of political support. Furthermore, we must not forget that the increase in bilateral trade was facilitated by the exclusion of Russia from the Swift financial system in 2022forcing the country to become more dependent on the Chinese yuan. This made China Russia’s main trading partner, absorbing products such as oil, gas and food at reduced prices. With an expiration date? The big question. Despite the boom, analysts like Zhang Yi, of iiMedia Research, They believe that the fashion will be temporaryalthough in 2026 they remain patent. The demand for Russian products in the Asian nation is based, a priori, on this novelty and perceived scarcity. Among the causes of the decline are that consumers have lost interest or competition between stores increases, at which time the popularity of these markets will probably decrease. This, added to the increasing doubts about the authenticity of the products Following investigations and regulatory pressure, they could accelerate their decline. Be that as it may, and in the face of growing skepticism, in Shanghai Some stores have changed their names to “Chinese-Russian Mutual Trade Stores” to reflect the true origin of their products. In Beijing, at least one store closed after failing to present documentation proving the authenticity of their imports. Long-term perspectives. Although trade between China and Russia still strongexperts predict that exchange volume could stabilize at $200 billiona figure lower than recent records. In the long term, a change in geopolitical relations, such as the resolution of the conflict in Ukraine, could allow Russia to normalize its trade ties with Europe, thereby reducing its dependence on China. Of course, this last scenario now seems very far away. Be that as it may, the rise of markets for Russian products in China reflects how geopolitical dynamics can influence consumer habits, at least in part. Of course, its sustainability is most uncertain due to the combination of regulatory pressures, doubts about the authenticity of the products and the eventual loss of consumer interest. Just in case, to the Russians they will always have the pork. Image | Weibo In Xataka | The biggest change in war is no longer drones: it is that Russia, the US and China are removing the human from the button In Xataka | Russia and China already had an advantage over the US in the Arctic. After Greenland, it has multiplied A version of this topic was published in 2025. We have updated it with information from 2026

Spain has been ignoring dozens of products that it sells daily in its supermarkets for decades. But that just ended

You may have read or heard it somewhere: “goodbye to turkey ham and stuffed olives.” And what a joke, can you imagine a world without anchovy-flavored olives? Having to live only on ham or chicken breast? Luckily, you don’t have to imagine it. They don’t disappear. What the Royal Decree does has unleashed All this controversy is something a little more complicated: putting in order the enormous food mess that has been growing for decades in Spanish pantries. What food mess? On February 27 Royal Decree 142/2026 was published that seeks to modify (or repeal) more than a dozen food quality provisions. It seems somewhat minor, but some of which (such as the cookie regulations) are more than 40 years old. The interesting thing, however, is that this new legislation removes from legal limbo numerous products that have not been ‘thought of’ at a regulatory level for many years. In that sense, the decree affects dozens of daily consumer products, but it does not affect them in the sense that ‘they are going to change’: it affects them in the sense that now the rules are going to be clearer. The case of turkey ham and stuffed olives are paradigmatic: the former now has a clear definition and the latter will have the obligation to specify the characteristics of the filling. But what is interesting is not what is important. The important thing, clearly, is the inclusion of gluten-free bread in the bread quality standard. Not only is it a historic demand of the celiac community, but it closes a very tough debate at a regulatory and fiscal level. Until now, at a technical level, the standard did not contemplate that bread made with gluten-free flour could be called bread. This ‘nonsense’ made celiacs They will pay more VAT than they would pay on normal breadbut it’s already over. Something similar happened with horchata without added sugar, the clarification of cider, the types of sangria or the acidity of vinegars. What does disappear. The bologna mortadellawhich until now was a category and which will now have to be called something else to avoid confusion with the designation of origin of the true Bologna mortadella. The central issue is that the agri-food industry has changed a lot. And as usual, the legislation has been dragging its feet, generating piecemeal regulations and creating completely inexplicable holes. So yes, we have taken a step forward. And without having to give up even the turkey ham and stuffed olives. Image | Xavi Cabrera In Xataka | This is how ultra-processed foods have been invading our diet: the evolution of three decades in a single graph

After launching the cheapest Mac in history, Apple is preparing three ‘Ultra’ products. Wants to go for both ends of the market

A few days after the arrival of MacBook Neothe cheapest Mac in history, we know thanks to Mark Gurman in Bloomberg that Apple is preparing three products for this year. All three aspire to be the most expensive in their category. And that contrast says a lot about Apple’s strategy for the immediate future. The panoramic. Gurman is the journalist with the best history of leaks about Apple. And he has published in his newsletter Power On that Apple plans to launch at least three products with the Ultra surname, or at least with its essence (the most powerful and expensive in its range): A foldable iPhone. We have been listening to it for years and It seems that 2026 is going to be the year. Expected price of around $2,000. It does not replace the Pro Max, but rather points to another form factor and to those who want to have the most advanced device in the line. AirPods with camera sensors. They would be above the AirPods Pro in price. Its differential would not be in the audio but in space capabilities that the cameras would provide. Macbook Ultra. Although it is not confirmed that it will be called that. With OLED touch panel and M5 Ultra chip. It would be the most expensive and powerful laptop ever launched by Apple, aimed at those who already spend similar amounts on a mac studio plus a monitor. All this in the same year that Apple launches the MacBook Neo for $600. He counted. They are complementary movements. The Neo lowers the barrier to entry into the Mac ecosystem, and the Ultra raises it for those who are already inside and can (and want) to go further. Apple has been trying a similar logic for some time. He first Apple Watch Ultra It arrived in 2022 for about double the price of the current Series. Without being a radically different product, it found its buyer: who wanted the best Apple Watch possible without the price being a major obstacle. It worked. Between the lines. The touch screen on a Mac deserves separate attention, because Apple justified not incorporating it a few years ago, when there was some pressure for it to do so, explaining that touching a computer screen is uncomfortable due to the position of the arm. The question. Just because the strategy is coherent on paper does not mean that all products will be able to sustain it. The foldable iPhone will arrive after seven years with other foldables on the market, without anyone being able to turn it into a bestseller. AirPods with cameras are going to have to offer something that justifies the spending premium, not just a gimmicky demo for the first few days. And the MacBook Ultra will have to justify its price with something that only that laptop can deliver. Apple knows better than anyone that a premium line demands that premium products truly deliver. In 2026 we will see if it is up to the task with this new shipment that seeks to raise the ceiling of several lines. In Xataka | Apple has only found one option to make a cheap laptop: make it a mobile Featured image | Tatiana Steve, insung yoon, dlxmedia.hu

and that includes products from Korea

Entering Mercadona and finding empty shelves in the cosmetics section is no longer surprising. What was once an almost automatic purchase—gel, deodorant, a basic cream—has transformed into a treasure hunt driven by social media: 3.50 euro products They sell out, they are recommended as if they were high-end and They generate videos with millions of views. It does not happen in a specialized perfumery or in Sephora, but between preparations and delicatessen. In the last year and a half, the white label Deliplus has gone from being a functional and cheap option to becoming one of the great engines of skincare in Spain. And not only because of price. What is happening in the aisles of Mercadona is the visible symptom of something deeper: a change in the way of consuming beauty, in the perception of luxury and in the growing—and now structural—influence of Korean cosmetics. Before the Korean aesthetic became explicit in its launches, Mercadona had already been training its consumers in a different logic for some time. In the last two years, Deliplus has intensified its presence with products that go far beyond basic care: serums with promises botox-likepatches, facial treatments, perfumes inspired by great houses and cosmetics designed to function as dupes of the high range. The strategy is to detect trends, replicate them quickly and place them in an everyday and massive environment, where the low price reduces the perceived purchase risk to almost zero. The result is not only sales volume, but a cultural phenomenon: the supermarket cosmetics aisle converted into a new aspirational showcase. Trying stops being a thoughtful decision and becomes an impulsive gesture. It is on this basis – a brand already accustomed to virality, to dupe and immediate consumption—where the codes of Korean cosmetics fit with special ease. The settlement of K-Beauty Korean cosmetics, known as K-Beautyhas not prevailed only for its products, but for a combination of industry, culture and digital marketing that has been going on for more than a decade expanding outside of South Korea. In economic terms, Korea has established itself as one of the great cosmetic powers in the world. since last year compete directly with historical giants like France or the United States. The K-Beauty It has ceased to be a niche fashion and has become a structural force in the global market, with a presence in pharmacies, department stores and European supermarkets. But its success goes beyond the numbers. Korea has been able to sell a specific idea of ​​beauty: compared to the traditional Western approach, which is more corrective and focused on treating visible problems, Korean cosmetics has built his story around prevention, care of the skin barrier and consistency from an early age. It is not about covering up imperfections, but rather preventing them from appearing. Hence aspirational concepts like the glass skin: luminous, uniform and healthy skin. This approach fits especially well into the logic of the algorithm. Step-by-step routines, visual formats, assets with recognizable names and photogenic results turn the K-beauty in perfect content for TikTok and Instagram. Added to this is the cultural weight of Hallyu u “Korean wave”: music, series and aesthetics that reinforce the association between Korea and cosmetic innovation. Mercadona does not adopt this philosophy in all its complexity, but it does translate its codes to European mass consumption: sticksessences, “all-in-one” products, language of star assets and visible promises in a short time. Koreanness works here as a cultural shortcut: it evokes care, modernity and efficiency without needing to explain the entire system behind it. One of the clearest examples is the Facial Clean detox & illuminating stick facial mask, which costs 3.50 euros. As explained Trendsit is a stick mask—very common in Asian cosmetics—whose format and message of quick results explain a good part of its success. However, compared to the narrative of “it works for everyone”, the first crack appears when the dermatological criterion comes into play. “There are no miracle creams”: the warning that does not go viral The dermatologist Almudena Nuño, who we have interviewedmakes it clear from the beginning: there are no universal or miraculous products. “The same cosmetic can be wonderful for one person and disastrous for another,” he explains. The difference is not in the price or the virality, but in the type of skin, in habits and in the rest of the products that are being used. In the specific case of this type of masks with clays, Nuño emphasizes that they can work well on combination or oily skin because they help absorb sebum and mattify, but they can be irritating on sensitive skin or skin with previous pathology. “When you see completely opposite opinions – some love it and others it destroys their skin – it is not because the product is good or bad, but because it is being used without criteria.” For the dermatologist, this is one of the big problems of the skincare viral: the promise of an immediate result detached from the context of use. The stick mask is no exception. In recent months, Mercadona has launched facial essences, hydrating mists, products with hyaluronic acid microcapsules and cosmetics that are deliberately placed in concrete steps of the Korean routine —after the toner and before the serum—. They are no longer just selling a cream: they are selling a way to take care of your skin. The problem, according to Nuño, is that they try to replicate a complete ritual with one or two products. “Korean cosmetics work because they are accompanied by habits: strict sun protection, consistency from an early age, careful diet, medical treatments when necessary. Here we want the result without everything else.” However, this phenomenon cannot be understood without the economic and cultural context. Mercadona has perfected what has been called the luxury of hallway: products reminiscent in texture, packaging or effect to high-end cosmetics—Lancôme, Dior, Shiseido—eliminating the price barrier. You don’t just buy a functional product; you buy the feeling of participating in a global trend. This … Read more

All tech companies are putting AI in all their products. The problem is that nobody wants them

It’s been a year and a half and it seems like 10 have passed. In May 2024, Microsoft announced the launching Windows Recallan artificial intelligence option that allowed us to remember and recover things we had done on our PC. It seemed like an interesting idea, but soon he was criticized his approach to privacy and security and the company had to delay it and then relaunch it without making too much noise. That was one of those AI features that promised to transform our PC experience, but three years after the launch of ChatGPT, one thing is certain: AI has not meant no revolution. Not at least on the PC, we insist. Microsoft, of course, has not stopped adding more and more AI functions to Windows 11. We have co-pilots and theoretically revolutionary functions to bore, and that obsession with putting AI even in the soup has been demonstrated with the legendary Notepadwhich has gone from being a minimalist app to one that is losing focus. Microsoft’s reasons are legitimate: they have invested a real fortune in AI and they will want to take advantage of it. Surely the intention was good (at least, in part) when it came to offering new ways of working and enjoying our PC. The problem is that good intentions have caused just the opposite of what Microsoft intended. Instead of us wanting to use Windows 11 more and more, is making us want to use it less and less. We have seen it with renewed interest for some Linux distributionsbut also with the appearance of an app that is exclusively dedicated to eradicating Windows 11 any trace of AI functions. AI fatigue The same thing is happening with AI browsers. Comet, Day and Atlas They are two striking proposals for this integration of AI functions, but neither of them seems to have caught on, and Microsoft Edge – which of course has integrated Copilot – has not proposed any change in trend either: the browsers we want to use, at least for the moment, continue to be the traditional ones, without AI. And there is the key. In what We users have not asked for so much AI. That is precisely the great criticism of these industry efforts to boast that their products have AI. Those two magic letters no longer get expectations. What they are starting to get is rejection. Firefox is the latest example. Mozilla has just appointed a new CEO, and in its first public statement it pointed out its intention to transform Firefox into a product in which AI was the central axis. The users of this browser – and I count myself among them – are not at all clear, and the unified response message has been clear: “Firefox does not need AI, but rather listen to its users“. What has happened and is happening with Windows 11 and Firefox shows that we are entering a new stage in which AI no longer excites, but rather fatigues. It’s everywhere: The list is of course much longer, and in many cases there is another added problem: that AI is the excuse to raise prices. Microsoft is here again a notable example with Microsoft 365but we have also seen it in Adobe, which He raised the price to his customers right off the bat because now they could enjoy an AI that they had not asked for. It’s happening everywhere because the promised AI revolution still hasn’t happened. There are, of course, areas in which it has proven to be transformative—programming is the clear case—but in many others that acronym has lost its meaning. The industry’s commitment to making this work is logical: companies have invested hundreds of billions of dollars invested with the idea that this was going to explode… and so far it hasn’t. But they continue to fill everything with AI. And as often happens, that’s the bad thing. It tires you a lot…And if we haven’t asked for it, even more so. In Xataka | Adobe has presented itself as the champion of copyright in the AI ​​era. Now we know that maybe not so much

Follow the presentation of OPPO’s new high-end products live

Today we have an important appointment with OPPO. The Chinese firm is back on track and has scheduled us in Barcelona for the launch of its new Find X9 series. They are mobile phones that clearly aspire to the podium of mobile photography and, as it could not be otherwise, you will be able to follow the presentation live and direct with us. OPPO conference will take place today, October 28, at 4:00 p.m. Spanish peninsular time and you can follow it with our comments on our YouTube channel. The schedules according to regions are as follows: Spain: 16:00 (15:00 in the Canary Islands). Mexico: 9:00 AM Colombia: 10:00 AM. Venezuela : 11:00 AM. Argentina, Chile: 12:00 PM. Live What we hope to see Unless there are surprises, it is most likely that today’s event will have two main protagonists: the OPPO Find X9 and OPPO Find X9 Pro. The Chinese firm did a very good job with the OPPO Find OPPO has been leaving clues on its networks, such as that the maximum zoom will be 120x (probably digital) and that the OPPO Find X9 Pro will have a 200-megapixel Hasselblad telephoto lens. another tweet It suggests that the battery will also be a cornerstone, since it will exceed 7,000 mAh. Silicon-carbon to power. Image shared by OPPO in X showing the new Find X9 and the Enco X3s 1 Image: OPPO – Click on the photo to see the original post We also see a change in the design, more rectangular than the last generation, and a generous camera module that apparently hides three cameras and not four, as was the case in the OPPO Find X8 Pro, although there seems to be room for a fourth sensor. Surely OPPO has left the zoom in the hands of that huge 200 megapixel sensorbut we will clear up doubts in just a little while. We will also see the differences between both devices, since from the photos they seem really similar. Last but not least, OPPO will present the OPPO Enco X3syour new headphones. These have been optimized by Dynaudio and will offer active noise cancellation, but we don’t know which range they will fit into. We will also have the opportunity to see ColorOS 16its new customization capability that promises, among other things, more fluidity. We will find out today, October 28, at 4:00 p.m., we are waiting for you! Live | Follow the presentation of the OPPO Find X9 Series Images | OPPO

It is called cheapflation and it directly attacks the most basic products

In recent years the inflation seemed to subside on the charts, but not where millions of homes feel it: the supermarket. Under this appearance of normality, a silent and structural shift has been taking place that does not hit everyone equally: because what increases the most is not luxury, but the essentials, and it is paid for by those who cannot stop buying it. One word sums it up and explains it perfectly. Cheapflation. I remembered this morning the newspaper El País that food inflation has not been neutral: it hits harder the less you have. Thus, the so-called cheapflation (the disproportionate increase in the cost of the cheapest products) has raised the price of basic foods by 37% between 2021 and 2024, compared to 23% for high-end foods. The result: the poor households spend more proportion of their income in essential goods, and when they try to lower their basket by replacing commercial brands with white brands or smaller formats, they discover that these ranges are precisely the ones that have increased the most. The burden is not only economic: the qualitative degradation of the diet in households with financial stress has an impact on health, and in Spain the ECB indicators show a gap “exceptional and persistent” between food and the rest of the prices from 2022, consolidating a structural, not cyclical, shock. Pandemic, energy neck and Ukraine. The sequence that triggered cheapflation is recognizable: the exit from confinements with the demand running ahead of the offer, the later energy escalation and logistics, and that war in Ukraine that has only been stress fertilizerscereals and fuels. The ECB estimates a +30% accumulated in food in the eurozone since 2019, and in Spain, groceries have risen more than 30% from 2021 (compared to 19% of the general CPI), with essentials such as meat, milk, butter between +30% and +50%and extreme peaks in olive oil, coffee or cocoa, with increases up to 80%. The hidden layer. The increase in food is not explained only by wars or general inflation, but by how it is organized the market itself. Since the 2008 crisis, basic foodstuffs have been traded as a financial product on futures exchanges, which allows for speculative movements that push up prices. Account the investigation from the Barcelona Urban Research Institute (IDRA) that at the same time the world cereal trade is in the hands of only five large companies that control between 70% and 90% of the market and they also participate on both sides: in the physical grain and in the financial business linked to that grain. Between 2021 and 2022 they obtained record profits, some multiplied by three on previous levels. That combination (few hands managing the product and the price) means that any global shock translates into higher prices faster and with more strength. Spain as a laboratory. According to the same report from the Barcelona Institute, in Spain, both manufacturers and distributors captured extraordinary margins in inflationary phase: agri-food leads the rise in margins with +38.1% since 2020; The large distribution groups declared record profits (7.5 billion in 2024), while salaries in the sector are below average and pockets of precariousness persist, such as in fruit in Lleida and Andalusia. The contrast in this sense is clear: income moves from consumers and labor to capital concentrated in an oligopolistic market whose pricing power has not been contested. Non-intervention policy. The report also pointed out that when the market is left to resolve itself, the same thing almost always happens: the hard of the cost remains in families (worse and more expensive food, more deprivation, more inequality) and the extraordinary benefits remain above. Spain is already the third country in Europe where the food deprivation in 15 yearsonly behind France and Greece, and mainly affects single-parent households, dependent people and precarious jobs. Although from 2023 costs went down energy and logistics, the final prices have not. When a price “jumps” due to a crisis, if there are few companies dominating the market, that jump becomes the new floor and there is no going back. Regulation of power. The studies agree in which the problem is not solved only with specific aid, but by changing how the market works. That means reduce concentration of power in a few companies, stop financial speculation with food and be able to put temporary caps on prices when there is a crisis to prevent them from staying at the top forever. According to the documentit is not useful to give money to the consumer (because the State pays it) or to demand discounts from the farmer (who is already the weakest link), the adjustment has to come of the middle part of the chain, where the highest margins are (industry and distribution), and with an active role of the State to monitor that price power. The ultimate goal is not only for food to cost less, but for essentials to stop depending on financial fluctuations and the control of a few companies that today they dominate the grain on which food security depends. Image | H. Friar In Xataka | The shopping basket is so expensive that many Madrid residents are driving 40 minutes to buy in a cheap supermarket In Xataka | They are touching our balls (specifically, their price)

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.