Tesla

There are more and more and better plugs for electric cars but Tesla continues to lead. The recipe: cheap and reliable loaders

by

Holy Week of 2024. Dozens of Tesla cars They queue in a Cañavate Atalaya charger (Cuenca) in the middle of any place. The situation went viral and because scenes were repeated in Mérida and Albacete. The waiting were 15 or 20 minutes in many cases but also exceeded the time in others. They all had something in common: Tesla Load Stations. Despite the jokes and despite the intention of ridiculing the owners, in Xataka We broke a spear in favor of those drivers And we count why they had happened. If Holy Week has taught us, it is not missing chargers for electric cars. What are missing are reliable plugs. So we titled. Year and a half later, things have changed. Not only in Spain, also in the United States. But, nevertheless, Tesla still has the best load experience. And that is still key when selling the car. Tesla chargers are still ahead The data this time comes from the United States but the situation is extrapolable to what happens in Spain. JD Powerspecialists in motor market analysis, has analyzed the status of the United States recharge network and its conclusion is very simple: there are more and more chargers available and increasingly spoil. But Tesla continues to lead, with much, satisfaction among electric cars when you have to recharge a vehicle. Keep in mind that the United States has a huge Loading deficit. Especially if we consider that distances are huge. If the country is wanted to embrace the electric car to a greater extent it is necessary to create a good network of loaders as fast as reliable. A good part of that network is now in the hands of Tesla, where most users load. They do not even have a Tesla. The latter is key to understand why satisfaction with the price of loaders and the load experience has fallen in the last year. According to their data, drivers are less happy with both points because they observe that, for them, prices are more expensive and the most rough experience than for Tesla users. Something curious occurs, therefore. According to JDPOWER, the level of failed visits (the charger does not work correctly or is out of service) is the lowest in four years and the number of drivers who have reported these failures (14%) is also lower than in 2024. General satisfaction, however, has fallen. The Tesla Network is so good compared to the competition that the users themselves have pressed to the manufacturers of other cars to the point that they have assumed the Tesla standard to load, modifying their own cargo ports. The best user experience In Spain (and Europe) that is not so because fast loaders are all (except for the first Japanese cars) CCS2. That is, the plugs are the same for everyone. But Tesla’s experience is still above. To understand it, we resume the case of Holy Week in 2024. This year the same have not been observed issues. Or not, at least, with the same seriousness as last year. It is logical, as we said that happened. Tesla has “kidnap” the owner of his cars in his own ecosystem. Tesla did something very intelligent since her birth. It was as simple as proposing their own load stations. Thus they guaranteed to give a confidence network to those who made the leap to a completely new company (and technology). They also took advantage, to create synergies of which the rest of the manufacturers have not arranged. First, his recharge were free. Now that is a thing of the past but their prices are still lower than those of the competition. This guarantees that, in the day to day, the Tesla user prioritizes the load in their stations. But saving a few euros on a very specific day is no reason for users to prefer to spend more than an hour stopped before recharging the vehicle. If those queues were formed, it is because the Tesla recharge network is very reliable. In fact, myself when I try the cars of any company for our reviews soil to prioritize Tesla plugs Because they have never left me. Only Zunder has offered me this same experience. With the rest of the companies I have had problems of malfunction or inoperance. It is logical, therefore, that if a Tesla driver has hurried the autonomy of his car is reluctant to go to another load point, consume a good part of the little percentage that remains reserved and risks that the plug of another company does not work. He will think: “Better wait here for an hour than to go to another place, Not being able to load and have to call the crane“ To this we must add that Tesla’s user experience is the best because they have eliminated small frictions that are very appreciated on a day -to -day basis. It is something similar to Apple’s ecosystem. Can you have a Mac, an Android phone and use some AirPods in the latter? Yes, but there are small barriers that the average or little advanced user will hurt especially. The same goes for the electric car. Tesla has one of the best software in the market and, probably, the best route calculator. Prioritize your chargers and show you in real time the occupation of it and advances a possible wait. When you arrive, the vehicle detects the loader, opens the load gate and plugs the hose in the car. When it is time to continue, the mobile phone warns you and as the car is associated with a credit or debit card, nothing must be done. The position will be passed. Simple. When one carries in Tesla supercargers with another car you have to Log in the mobile phone and select the load point you will use. You have previously had to register the card. Finally the position will be passed. This process has to repeat it with Each and every one of the companies … Read more

Tesla has launched in China a Model and L. It is the most Chinese (and logic) bet that could do in the short term

by

After months in which he has signed up for a Tesla Model and smallsomething cheaper to boost sales in Europe and press the competition for price, Tesla has surprised us with quite the opposite: a tesla model and longer. Only for China. And it makes all the meaning. The new Tesla Model Ylthat is, the elongated body version of the well -known electric SUV, increases the 150 millimeter wheelbase and its height in another 44 millimeters. A six -seater configuration is adopted (2+2+2) Therefore, a third row of seats is added that has been somewhat controversial. But it is also provided with heating and ventilation to the seats, electrical plates and integrated speakers. They are small improvements to increase the comfort of the passengers that are in tune with the bets of the L versions that the rivals usually offer in China. A category of vehicles that are based on three fundamental pillars: more space and more comfort for passengers. And that, curiously, they are transverse to all types of sizes. Purely Chinese With the presentation of Tesla Model YL, the opinions between criticism and public have been divided as usually happens with Elon Musk’s company. In Hybrids and electric They point out that some media qualify the third row like “going mounted in a convertible”given the little size between the head of the passenger and the roof. They ensure that the space that is free in the legs for a 1.70 -meter person is minimal and that it is an emergency solution for adults. In social networks a whole debate has been mounted following some images in which the same adult is seen sitting in the third row of seats. In one of them You see how it has a lot of free height between the head and the roof and ensures that it measures almost 1.90 meters. In another image it is observed as, with the trunk open, that same adult I would have serious problems traveling comfortably. Personally, I am inclined to think that the second option is the real but that does not mean that Tesla’s bet is bad. Yes, there are rivals that have a third row of more comfortable or practical seats. We have verified it in the Hyundai ioniq 9 or his brother, the KIA EV9. However, they are cars created from scratch with this intention in mind. Tesla is adding a third row of seats with a body L to improve the versatility of the car but, above all, with the intention of improving the comfort of the second row. That third row is an emergency solution and the really interesting is in a second row of a 2+2 configuration car with two good seats with all the comforts desired by a passenger. And in China the bodies L are usual. These cars are versions with longer bodies, with more wheelbase to generate a greater interior space. Europe has tired of selling this type of cars and Audi there, for example, demonstrates that the phenomenon is transverse to the size of the vehicle. The Germans have sold in China the Audi a3 l But also in those cars that, for European standards, already seem huge and do not need more interior space. Example? An Audi A8 L. To get an idea, this last car can exceed 5.19 meters to some endless 5.32 meters or impressive 5.45 meters. The latter refer to Audi A8 l horch. But the most interesting is in its interior seats with resting function or the possibility of adding a fridge in the central compartment, among other possibilities within the company’s customization program. Obviously, we talk here about a luxury car that Tesla does not intend to match but the company’s movement clearly points to proposing an experience in the cabin that is very sought in the Chinese car, transforming the interior into a kind of lounge with more space where feeling as comfortable as possible. Keep in mind that the great Chinese metropolis are huge and that the paths can languish for many minutes before the driver reaches his destination. This has made Chinese cars (and Europeans who want to sell there) have thrown into the arms of the screens and connectivity. But also that very wide rear seats are prioritized. Even sacrificing a good part of the trunk where Chinese cars tend to lose in front of the rivals. This happens because, despite its enormous sizes, in China the car is a Priority urban vehicle. It is rare that you travel with them since the distances are so long and the trains so competitive that either it is traveling in high speed or by plane. That is, cars are spaces with wheels where it is about giving the highest comfort to the client (another good example is the rise of their luxury minorities). And that is why the L -bodies L versions do not seek to have a third row of very comfortable seats. It is about prioritizing central seats in a 2+2+2 configuration and, in the best case, add a third emergency option. That is what Tesla has done. Photo | Tesla In Xataka | Tesla wants to keep certain accidents of accidents with her cars. A judge will decide if they should be made public

A hunt is aiming two Tesla Cybertruck to fly through the air

by

In the military field, it is normal Try to get ahead to the scenarios that can Pose the enemy. However, what is about to happen in a specific area of the United States possibly breaks with any other operation of the past. In a play that mixes futuristic technology with military strategy, the United States Air Force has two Tesla Cybertrucks between eyebrow and eyebrow, but not to use them, but to destroy them. A singular purchase. Yes, the United States Air Force has launched a peculiar request: has acquired two Tesla Cybertrucks And it is placing them as targets for tests precision with missiles. Although at first glance it may seem an eccentricity, the decision contains a reasoning that goes far beyond symbolism or technological extravagance. The goal declared It is to evaluate how certain types of ammunition react and behave when they hit vehicles that, according to internal projections, could be in the hands of enemies in future combat scenarios. The acquisition is part of a larger package of 33 vehicles that will be allocated to the White Sands Missile Range base in New Mexico, where the Air Force Test Center (AFTC) carries out advanced exercises, many of them in collaboration with the US Special Operations Command (Socom). Cybertruck as part of the enemy. The specific inclusion of the cybertruck inside the list (when no other brand vehicle appears cited) responds to An internal study of February 13, 2025, which evaluated the design, materials, impact resistance and technological innovations of this model. He justifying documentpartially censored but published online, concludes that the angular design and the without painting stainless steel of the vehicle place it in a separate category, completely different from conventional vehicles with steel or painted aluminum chassis. To this is added its electrical architecture of 48v, an still incipient technology among competitors. According to The AFTCthere are no comparable vehicles in the market. One More Thing. But the most disturbing of the application is the premise that supports it: it is considered “probable” that future adversaries begin to use cybertrucks in combat areas, and it is pointed out that these vehicles have demonstrated unexpected resistance to damage after greater impacts. Without specifying the scenario or the enemy to which allusion is made for obvious reasons, the document underlines the need to replicate realistic environments in training, including vehicles that could be used by hostile forces. The war truck. He Geopolitical context in which this restlessness is placed has broader implications. Although it is not explicitly mentioned, SOPGM (Stand Off Precision Munitions) programs are mainly designed to neutralize mobile threats In the Middle East, Central Asia, Africa and other environments where the objectives are usually adapted civil vehicles. In this context, the cybertruck not only embodies a symbol of technological status, but can represent A tactical threat real if used by armed or insurgent actors who seek improvised armor, silent electrical mobility and structural resistance. Recent history offers some clues: Ramzan Kadyrov, leader of Chechnya, He showed publicly Several modified cybertrucks With machine guns 12.7 mm caliber, allegedly sent to Ukraine. Beyond its doubtful origin (given its inclusion in sanctions lists), these vehicles symbolize the growing crossing between consumer technology and irregular war. Other tests in the past with cars Musk’s “apocalyptic” car. When Elon Musk presented the cybertruck in 2019, he did it with a promise: a vehicle “Apocalypse proof”with armored windows, ultra -resistant and science fiction chassis. Since then, it has been subject to fervor and mockery in equal parts. Ha suffered withdrawalcriticism for Your finishesdoubts about Your reliabilityand a growing perception that the initial vision has been weighed by structural problems. In spite of everything, Tesla has sold about 46,000 units (according to estimates of this spring), with the majority concentrated In North America. However, it has been confirmed that some copies have already arrived in the Middle Eastand Tesla announced in April that it will open direct sales In Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Qatar before the end of the year. The importance of the enclave. That geographical turn of the Cybertruck distribution cannot be overlooked. If the vehicle becomes available in regions where militias or state actors with interests facing the United States operate freely, it could become an impromptu platform For mobile attacksarmored transport or even paramilitary use. In fact, several companies are already offering Modified versions of the cybertruck for security agenciespolice bodies or armed forceswith additions such as additional armor, tactical kits and unnimlined unipersonal configurations. The United States Department, which this year considered Acquire cybertrucks for diplomatic use, canceled that intention shortly after, probably because of the political and symbolic implications of the vehicle. Consumer technology (or conflicts). The history of the use of civil vehicles as whites in military training It is not new. For years, the US army has employed Toyota Hilux or Land Cruisers trucks, Imimitations of Asian SUV or sedans used by insurgents, as part of its simulation exercises. The new in this case is The qualitative leap which represents the cybertruck: a high -end electric vehicle, sold as an emblem of modernity and status, which now enters the orbit of asymmetric war. The decision of the Air Force to use it as a target of proof reflects a broader transformation in the way in which armies are prepared for the conflicts of the future. It is no longer just training against armored armored or pickups, but to assume that high -tech civil arsenal (globally commercialized) can be integrated into operations theaters in an unconventional way. Between the plausible and the absurd. The Tesla case as a missile goal Raises broader questions about the evolution of modern combat. If the military considers plausible for a future enemy to use luxury electric vehicles as mobile war platforms, what other elements of the civil world could be militarized? The same logic that promotes the acquisition of these training vehicles can be applied to Other technological artifacts whose use moves from private consumption to … Read more

In his efforts to retain Elon Musk, Tesla has found a formula to motivate him to follow as CEO: 29,000 million dollars

by

Tesla has approved a New Actions Package For Elon Musk valued at approximately 29,000 million dollars According to the market value. The new remuneration plan to the CEO of Tesla has, as the sole objective of binding the chair of executive director, at least In the next two years. The measure arrives at a time when the company’s actions seem to have stabilized after successive political earthquakes caused by Musk, who have shaken the confidence of investors. This tense calm has led to Tesla seeking to ensure the permanence of Elon Musk in front, with a new temporary agreement that, as They stood out in Financial Timesmove away from conventional ones Bonds by objectives of the CEO Of the big companies and seems to be more an incentive for Musk to change their attitude and focus on their work in Tesla. 29,000 million in exchange for behaving well The new incentive package, valued in about 29,000 is, in reality, A temporary solution. The previous Musk remuneration bonus approved in 2018 for more than 56,000 million dollars was blocked up to twice by a delaware court before the complaint of a Tesla shareholder who He considered it excessive. The court He proved him. That is, Elon Musk would have been working since 2018 in exchange for a symbolic salary to which the law forces (about $ 56,000 a year, According to the accounts presented by Tesla) to which the CEO resigned, since it could not collect the incentive bonus it did. With this new remuneration package, Tesla seeks a way to compensate Musk for the work of the last seven years, while unlocking his previous compensation. If you finally unlock Your 2018 bonus, This package will be canceled and will only receive the 56,000 million dollars that he had already achieved. The package approved by Tesla gives Musk 96 million restricted shares that may be exercised with a fixed price of $ 23.34 per share, well below the current market prices that are around $ 300 per share. In order for Musk to receive these actions, he must continue playing a management role (not necessarily CEO, just manager) in Tesla up to at least 2027 and maintain blocked shares five years later to only sell what is necessary for taxes. The electric car manufacturer has defined the offer as a “first crucial step” for a “long -term compensation strategy for CEO”. Its plan is to design a more detailed remuneration plan and with a more long -term vision for Musk before the company’s shareholders board in November, to submit it to a vote. Attracts attention that, unlike what is usually common in Incentives to managersthis remuneration is not linked to the demand for greater dedication of Musk to solve the problems of Tesla or the achievement of certain challenges that the company has ahead, such as overcoming The fall in sales In good part of the world markets, the Robotaxi implantation autonomous or the development of Optimus robots. Tesla seems to conform to Elon Musk occupies CEO’s chair for the next two years, a rather lax demand taking into account that a few months ago investors claimed Musk to dedicate At least 40 hours per week to Tesla, considering that divides its time into other companies such as Spacex, Neuralink and XAI. Musk motivation and future A few months ago, before the judicial blockade of his 2018 bonus, Musk himself already stated that he can “lose motivation” if he is not compensated properly and dedicate Even less time To Tesla. Therefore, this millionaire package is key to having it focused on the company and preventing it from dispenseing in its other projects. As the Wall Street Journal remembered, Elon Musk said he wanted to have enough control Voting not to be “unseed by activist investors.” “It is not a matter of money. It is a reasonable control over the future of the company. Above all, if we are building millions, potentially billions, of humanoid robots. I can not sit wondering if the activists are going to throw me for political reasons. It would be unacceptable. That is the only thing that matters,” he said In an interview During the Catar Economic Forum in May. The main trick in Tesla’s manga is that Musk, in addition to its CEO, is also one of its main shareholders, controlling approximately 20% of its actions. That is some 194,000 million dollars of your personal fortune. Which is already in itself A good incentive. In Xataka | How much money Elon Musk has: how the fortune of the man who plans the colonization of Mars from a social network is distributed Image | Tesla, dvids (Trevor Cokley)

Toyota already knows that the gap with Tesla and Byd has its origin in its Japanese company culture

by

We are living the future. The transition to the electric car and how this is being carried out will define what we will see in the coming years. With a changing political environment, hard emission regulations for Europe And a Chinese market that seems to Just look at borders insidethe investments that are made and the focus of how the future is faced will be key. Right now, saying what will be the design of a traditional car brand to ten or fifteen views is little less than adventurous. There are those who assume that Tesla has reached her roofthat Chinese manufacturers have complicated to follow Breaking barriers (economic and psychological in consumers) and that Toyota, very conservative, is the one who is playing the smartest game. And there are those that defend with cape and sword that Tesla has created a new way of understanding the vehicle, based on software. Also that China carries the front and that it is only a matter of time that we embrace throughout Europe the Byd, Nio, Xpeng and, of course, Xiaomi proposals. They are usually the same as they point out that Toyota is only taking the first steps of their decline or, at least, a logical setback given its brand strategy. Be that as it may, decade and a half will have to know who is right. However, we must recognize the latter who, in part, Toyota is concerned about how things advance internally. Also that you are taking measures to solve it. And that your business culture is key. The software as an example of a major problem We counted a few weeks ago that in Toyota they were worried about the way of working in the company. In their collaboration with Byd in China they had discovered that the company of the neighboring country worked at a devilish pace implementing changes in record time. They explained then in Reuters that much of the secret were in the evidence that each new change passed before being approved. While European manufacturers made thousands of kilometers before giving green light to each small modification, Chinese brands preferred put it as soon as possible on the street And, if necessary, apply changes when the vehicle development phase was already very advanced. That cultural shock is even more pronounced with Chinese manufacturers. Consulting specialized in the automobile market have already advanced to Toyota and the rest of Japanese manufacturers that their business culture, in which it is about working on the same concept and repeatedly improve it in search of perfection, is outdated. Then the Caseoft company already encouraged them to expedite the deadlines and think about electric cars from scratch and not only as a purely electric alternative of their combustion cars. This would allow them to save on components (applying plastic instead of more noble materials) and directly eliminate some of them (such as reinforcements that make sense not to transmit vibrations inside the car but lack them when what moves the vehicle is a combustion engine). On that path to adapt to the new times, Bloomberg Explain that Toyota has hired Code Chrysalisa Start Up based in Tokyo specialized in software development. That consultant says that Toyota has already understood the importance that software will play in the future but “remains slow.” Code Chrysalis is organizing intensive camps in Silicon Valley to improve the programming knowledge of Toyota employees With the latest ads about its upcoming electric cars and plug -in hybrids, Toyota confirmed that had worked in software completely renewed and anticipated that they would show more details when these cars are launched to the street. In the presentation of the new TOYOTA RAV4 It was specified that we were facing “the first step towards vehicles fully defined by software.” Already in May, Financial Times He echoed that Toyota had put a greater effort to evolve his software, understanding that in the future it will be a purchase value (if it is not already). With them, we knew that Toyota looked at Chinawith the aim of evolving and learning from those who have revolutionized the interior of their vehicles. Now we also know that, by the hand of Code Crysalis, the company is organizing camps in Silicon Valley to learn coding intensively and then try to replicate what they learned in its future models. However, in Bloomberg They point out that part of these chosen employees are disappointed Because they understand that efforts are still insufficient. In fact, the media indicates that the division designed to develop software has not been directly integrated into the vehicle development chain and that, among hands, have digitalization projects that affect the entire company. For some of the workers, the strategy is still too conservative. In your information, Bloomberg He explains that the company follows a too conservative philosophy in which those who have a long curriculum within the company are greatly rewarded and the labor harmony over risks. They put as an example the case of a worker interested in autonomous driving who, however, when he entered the company, he was doing a quality control of low importance quality. It is just another example of what Toyota defends as Kaizen philosophy. A business culture directly linked to a philosophical posture in which it is preferred to improve until the exhaustion is known before taking a new product and starting from scratch, on a blank paper. It is not accidental, therefore, that the company’s strategy is (at least for the moment) strikingly conservative. Toyota does not stop repeating that they will sell the proper car (electric, plug -in hybrid or combustion vehicle) In the right market. At the same time, what is undeniable is that they have a five years being the company that sells the most cars. The big doubt is whether in decade and a half we will be talking about the first steps of its stagnation or the winning strategy in front of a competition that launched into the arms … Read more

He left his tesla Cybertruck plugged in and went on vacation. Two weeks later, the vehicle no longer lit

by

Imagine the scene. You have a tesla and you are about to go on vacation. The trip will be by plane, so you face an immediate decision:leave the car plugged in During the two weeks you will be out or wait to connect it when returning? If you follow the manufacturer’s recommendations, the answer is clear: it is best to leave it plugged in. That was exactly what Aj Esguerra did, resident in Arizona. The official advice followed to the letter. But when he returned home after his break, he ran into an unpleasant surprise: his Tesla Cybertruck did not respond. This is what they tell in Motorpasion Mexico. What failed? We go in parts. What happened exactly to cybertruck At first glance, everything seemed in order. As the user explains in a group of Tesla ownersthe charger worked, the car had been left with 79 % battery and the Tesla app showed that the load limit It was set at 80 %. But when returning on vacation, Aj Esguerra encountered the last thing one would expect from a connected vehicle: a completely inert cybertruck. “I need help: we were out two weeks and when returning, the Cybertruck does not turn on at all,” he explained. I couldn’t even open the doors. He restarted the charger – the blue light went to flash in red – and began to consider hypotheses: “I live in Arizona and this week we have had record temperatures. Could the battery have overheated and damaged the battery?” AJ contacted the technical service through the app and, as he said, the answer was immediate. “The Tesla service is on its way. They responded quickly through the application and received a call immediately,” he explained. The technicians managed to access the interior of the vehicle, put it in a provisional way and They transferred to a service center For a more complete diagnosis. There came the final explanation. The problem was not the battery, nor the heat, nor an error when programming the load. The failure was in a key component of the Cybertruck electrical system: the Power conversion system (PCS). According to Esguerra, the technicians ruled out that the breakdown was related to having left the car plugged in. In fact, they reiterated that this is still the recommended practice. The good news: Tesla took over the reparation without any cost for the owner. Thus, the vehicle worked normally. What is the power converter and what does it do As Skill-Lync points outthe SCP plays a fundamental role: it is in charge of managing how electrical energy in the vehicle enters and is distributed. When we connect the car to a power outlet, the SCP transforms that alternating current (CA) in direct current (CC) To load the main, high voltage battery. But he doesn’t stay there. Power conversion system He is also responsible for keeping the car’s auxiliary systems – such as lights, internal electronics or sensors – through a second conversion: high voltage to a lower voltage. It is composed of several key elements: CC-CC converters, filters, electronic controllers and a liquid cooling system to avoid overheating. In the cybertruck is located in the auxiliary compartment Known as the “Ancillary Bay”, which requires the removal of some sheets to access it. The official recommendations Tesla makes it clear in the cybertruck user manual: The most important thing to preserve the high voltage battery is leave the vehicle plugged in When not used. This is literally indicated by the manufacturer, which warns that the car, even off, continues to consume energy progressively. And if the load falls to zero, damage that does not cover the warranty can occur. In addition, Tesla recommends not waiting for the load level to be low to plug the car. In fact, he affirms that the system pays better if it is kept loaded regularly, even if it is not used. And in case of a prolonged trip, it advises to calculate that the vehicle loses around 1 % battery per day, although that figure can vary depending on the temperature or vehicle configuration. The background message is clear: nothing happens to leave it plugged for weeks, provided that everything works correctly. Although, as we have seen in this case, sometimes things do not go as expected. So, is it safe to leave the car plugged for weeks? In theory, yes. It is what Tesla recommends and is what Aj Esguerra did. But the case of his cybertruck shows that, in practice, Other factors can come into play They escape user control. For example, a peak of voltage in the electricity grid, a punctual failure in the charger or overheating due to extreme temperatures can trigger a chain of errors difficult to detect if no one is there to intervene. In the absence of supervision, a minor incident may end up becoming a major problem. Esguerra himself acknowledged that, before leaving, forgot to schedule the load for the freshest hours. The Cybertruck was carrying day, in the middle of heat wave in Arizona, for several days in a row. Although Tesla did not attribute the failure to heat or continuous load, that context helps to understand how certain environmental factors can increase risk, especially in extreme climates. So, leaving the car plugged in is recommended. But it is also to ensure that the charger works correctly, that the environment is safe and that the electrical installation is protected against unforeseen events. In that balance between trust and prevention is where you should really reduce the possibilities of meeting any type of inconvenience. Images | Formulate (CC By-SA 2.0) | Tesla In Xataka | Norway has tested the real autonomy of electric cars. His verdict: Tesla and Chinese brands are ahead

Tesla and Chinese brands are ahead

by

Norway is the country where more electric cars are bought worldwide. If we obviously take into account its market share since in Europe countries such as Germany passes over it in terms of volume. He Government thrust It has been such that The electric car has settled with much as the best selling. In June 2025their sales reached more than 96% share And of the almost 19,000 units sold during that month, only 577 units had combustion engines. And, of them, just over a hundred had no electrification. Aware of the importance of supporting possible buyers, the Norway Auto Club It has been doing real autonomy tests to the most relevant electric cars and those that are launched. These are the results of the last exam. Tesla and China at the head The Norway Auto Club performs two tests a year, one in winter and one in summer. This time, 27 vehicles have been submitted to the exam and the general data obtained (which can be seen in this link) They have been good: 15 of them have overcome autonomy with WLTP cycle. The evidence that are done try simulate real conditions of the Norwegian average driver. They mostly run along secondary roads, with average speed of 70 km/h. Punctually, they touch the highway twice. When the car runs out of battery, they write down the number of kilometers performed. And in their tests there are two clear winners. Among those 15 cars that has achieved more autonomy above what was recorded in the WLTP cycle was the Tesla Model and, which has exceeded the approval barrier in 66 kilometers, registering 652 kilometers of real autonomy instead of the 582 expected kilometers. Among the 10 that have also added to Tesla Model 3, closing the list (+19 kilometers) but in between we find the Zeekr 7x, second with +52 kilometers, the Byd Tang, third with +42 kilometers, the mg S5, fifth with +27 kilometers, the Polestar 4 (of Chinese origin sharing chassis with zeekr and volvo) Seventh with +27 kilometers, and the Byd Sealion 7, ninth with +21 kilometers. That is, among the 10 cars that earn more autonomy Regarding the approved, two are Tesla cars and five others assemble Chinese technology. Only the Peugeot E-5008 (fourth with +28 km), the Volkswagen ID.7 GTX Tourer (Sixth with +27 km) and the BMW IX (eighth with +23 km) sneak in this list. Among the 12 that have obtained worse results losing autonomy, we find seven European or American cars. In addition, the KIA EV3, with a loss of 17 kilometers of autonomy with respect to what was marked by WLTP, is also found in this group. In this case, only the MG Cyberster (-14 km), the Hongqi EHS7 (-16 km), the Polestar 3 (-25 km) and the Volvo Ex90 (-32 km) are found in this group. Interestingly, the car that has lost the most autonomy is the Lucid Air, a luxury berlina that wants to shade the Tesla Model S, with a fall of 131 kilometers in front of what was expected by WLTP. However, it is the car that has traveled more kilometers between loads, covering 829 kilometers of the pull. The next most capable model was Tesla Model 3, with 721 real kilometers. The BMW IX and its 691 kilometers covered closes the podium. Photo | Norway Auto Club In Xataka | In 2017 Norway, it was proposed that 100% of the cars sold in 2025 were electric. Is about to get it

The Samsung chips manufacturing subsidiary walks on the tightrope. Tesla will save her from collapse

by

Samsung has reached an agreement with Tesla. An important agreement. According to Bloombergthese two companies have signed a commitment that will run until 2033 and for which the subsidiary specialized in the manufacture of integrated circuits of this South Korean company will produce for Tesla chips for a value of 16.5 billion dollars in its Texas plant (USA). Not bad at all, especially if we are in mind that Samsung urgently needs that its semiconductor division Increase your presence in the market. Jay Y. Lee, the president of this company, sent in the middle of last March An internal statement in which it synthesizes with great precision what this company faces: “Our technological advantage has been compromised in all our businesses. It is difficult to see that efforts are being made to boost great innovations or assume new challenges. There are only attempts to maintain the status quo instead of generating disruptive changes. “ The Samsung subsidiary specialized in the manufacture of semiconductors is largely the company’s engine, and to recover health it is essential that its competitiveness increases. However, to carry it out it is necessary that its integration technology of 2 nm pelee from you to you both with the equivalent lithography of Intel, and, above all, with that of TSMC. However, Samsung’s starting point is favorable. And it is because He has been working in which it is undoubtedly The most important photolithography in its history. The 2 nm are crucial Samsung has led for more than three decades the industry of integrated dram circuits, but the rise of the artificial intelligence (AI) has triggered something that just two or three years ago would have seemed unthinkable: now it is also the South Korean SK Hynix the manufacturer of integrated memory circuits that LEADS THE HBM Chips Market so much (High Bandwidth Memory) that work side by side with the GPUs for the The one of the DRAM memories. Chips manufacturers need the candlestick performance of their avant -garde nodes to be at least 70% In current circumstances it is evident that Samsung needs to trace as soon as possible. And it seems that it is in it. At the beginning of 2025 several South Korean media anticipated that Large scale manufacturing of 2 nm chips It had already begun in the company’s South Korean plants. However, this does not mean that Samsung already has everything tied. Chips manufacturers need The performance by wafer of his avant -garde nodes is at least 70%and, according to the South Korean newspaper Munhwa Ilbothis company currently moves in the range of 40 to 50%. Even so, the Japanese chips designer for the preferred networks (PFN) and a South Korean company specialized in the design of neuronal processing units (NPU) They were already interested in early 2025 in which Samsung manufactured his designs in his new 2 nm node. There is no doubt that at the delicate moment this company is going through, having several agreements tied before its competitors initiate large -scale production with equivalent photolithographs is very important. However, this is not all. And is that just five months after that news the South Korean medium Chosunbizwhich in the matter of semiconductors does not usually give stitch without a thread, said Samsung I had already started the evidence In its 2 Nm node For Nvidia and Qualcomm. This test process does not guarantee that Samsung is finally going to manufacture integrated 2 Nm circuits for these two US companies, but their interest in the technology of this South Korean company is an oxygen ball. There is no doubt about that. Image | Samsung More information | Bloomberg In Xataka | This is the chips war: a former SK Hynix employee is suspected to deliver stolen technology to Huawei

make Tesla the most hated electric car manufacturer

by

Until a few months ago, Tesla was considered one of the most admired and innovative companies in the automotive industry, highlighting among the brands preferred by consumers. However, a Recent study It shows a radical change in the public perception of the brand that reveals that Tesla has become the manufacturer of electric vehicles most hated by consumers. Something that I would explain the fall in the delivery of vehicles of 14% that Tesla has registered In your second quarter accounts. They are not cars, it is their brand. This change in consumers’ opinion is largely linked to consumer’s fed up for constants Failure promises of the brand regarding functions such as FSD (Full Self-Driving) and, above all, to Elon Musk’s political role. The study ‘Electric vehicle intelligence report’which survey more than 8,000 people in spring and summer of 2025, has revealed that Tesla occupies the last position of popularity in a list of 19 manufacturers of electric vehicles. 39% of respondents have a negative opinion about the brand, a percentage that exceeds that of other electric car manufacturers such as General Motors, Kia or Ford, who share only 13% of negative perception each. Buyers have lost their trust. The report indicates that “Tesla’s brand reputation continues in Declive. The industry leader remains in serious Consumer problemsas demonstrated by the lowest positive net perception (-13) registered in our data to date, as well as the highest total percentage of distrust (48%) and the lowest intensity of trust (-19) among all brands of electric vehicles surveyed. “ In this context, no matter if Tesla builds tomorrow the Best market electric carif it does not come back to Gain trust of its potential buyers. Tesla is not interested. The report highlights the skepticism of consumers towards the proposals of the brand fruit of the unfulfilled promises that your CEO He has been doing for decades and have not yet materialized. The result no longer shows interest in Brand news. When asking the participants for the new Robotaxi service That the brand is testing in Austin, most respondents initially did not know the service. After reading An informative article Posted in The Wall Street Journal50% expressed rejection of service use and 53% were concerned about Your safety and reliabilityafter the Mortal accidents with autopilot and that they are taking the company before the courts. A turning point. According to The annual survey Harris poll 100 axios, in 2021 Tesla enjoyed An enviable reputationrecognized as the ninth brand most appreciated by the American public. This remained well into 2024, at which time it fell to 65th of 100, coinciding with the political positioning of Elon Musk when he announced that he would support the Donald Trump’s candidacy. From that moment on, Tesla’s popularity did nothing but fall. After the role of Musk at the head of Doge’s cuts, Tesla’s reputation has not stopped down and is now in 95 of 100. Spacex starred in a similar decline. Not only consumers, but also shareholders. The report also asked Tesla’s shareholders, revealing that 61% of participants want Elon Musk Stop getting involved in politics and concentrate on the direction of the company. 51% of Tesla surveyed shareholders want Musk to spend more time to Tesla. When asking them about Musk’s political role, 12% ensures that they prefer to remain involved in government activities, while 43% consider that Your Doge departure It was positive for Tesla. In Xataka | The return to Elon Musk’s policy has been very celebrated by Tesla investors. For investors to losses, of course Image | Flickr (Gage Skidmore), Unspash (Dmitry Novikov)

Nintendo Switch 2 After a month of use, we tried the new Tesla Model and Juniper and much more in 1×15 crossover

by

Friday arrives and that means two things: that the weekend is just around the corner and that the New Crossover episode. As always, we are facing a very varied program in which we talk about the new Nintendo Switch 2 And our experience during this first month of life, of Peter Thiel and of the new Tesla Model Y. Videogames, PayPal Mafia And technological cars, there is nothing. First, Carlos and Jaume discover with our partner Javier Pastor the peculiar story of Peter Thiela well -known executive from Silicon Valley who co -founded Paypal and whose fortune amounts to more than 2,000 million dollars. It was also the first investors on Facebook and, today, is dedicated to the world of Big Data, Intelligence and Security in Palantir. Then Jaume tells us how his experience with the new Tesla Model and Juniper. The firm has refined the formula in its new SUV, offering better materials and finishes, an optimized dynamic and a Price/autonomy ratio that is still one of the best in the market. Of course, it still has things to improve and the competition squeezes more than ever. Finally, we review how the Nintendo Switch 2 for a montha console that has proven to be as juicy as polarizing. The new Nintendo laptop wins in potential, materials and ergonomics, but its screen, despite having won seclies, is already LCD again to have an improvable brightness level. We would also have liked to have enjoyed better autonomy. On YouTube | Crossover

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.