In 2019 no one gave a damn for it, and today it is one of the best adaptations of a video game

Nobody was betting much on an adaptation of the mythical blue hedgehog from Segha’s games in 2019 when Paramount published the first trailer for its film and unleashed a storm of memes. Five years and three deliveries later, ‘Sonic the Hedgehog 3’which reaches Netflix on June 10, can boast $492 million at the box office and two stars like Jim Carrey and Keanu Reeves on board the franchise. And the cherry on top: critics, for the first time in the saga, have sided with the hedgehog. We all remember how a avalanche of memes It ended up giving rise to a film that not only succeeded in fleshing out the schematic plot of the original games, but along the way grossed $319 million at the global box office. Three films later, the series has grossed more than $1.2 billion worldwide. ‘Sonic 3’, produced with a budget of $122 million, became the highest grossing of the franchise and closed its career as the tenth most watched in 2024. It is the second most lucrative video game adaptation in history, behind only ‘Super Mario Bros. The Movie’. In this new installment we move to 1974: a meteorite with an alien hedgehog on board, Shadow, falls on Earth. Professor Gerald Robotnik, grandfather of the villain of the series, subjects him to experiments in a secret facility, where the hedgehog befriends the scientist’s granddaughter. When an accident kills the girl, Shadow is left in suspended animation for fifty years. In 2024 someone frees Shadow, who wakes up furious and attacks Tokyo uncontrollably. Sonic, Tails and Knuckles try to stop him without success, forcing them to turn to Doctor Robotnik himself to stop him. On Rotten Tomatoes, Sonic the Hedgehog 3 accumulates 86% (and 95% of the public). Jim Carrey’s double role and the fast-paced pace of the film are responsible for these ratings, well above the scores of the previous installments, which do not reach 70%. The presence of Keanu Reeves has also been highly praised, as he provides an astonishing gravity and dramatic component to Shadow, a secondary character in the video games who here takes a particularly threatening form. A fun and fast-paced puzzle in which, for once, all the pieces seem to fit together. In Xataka | Scorsese signed one of his masterpieces with this film whose new version in series format arrives on streaming today

“My AMOS-6 scar started itching when I saw the New Glenn video”

September 1, 2016. SpaceX is available to launch one of its Falcon 9 rockets, loaded with the AMOS-6 satellite. It was not a new procedure, but something went wrong and the rocket exploded on the launch pad, causing great damage to it. May 28, 2026. Blue Origin begins a static firing test of its New Glenn rocket, but it is not completed. The rocket explodesdestroying the launch pad in its wake. The similarity between both events shows us that catastrophic explosions occur even in the most million-dollar companies. But it also helps us make calculations about what the future of Jeff Bezos’ company could be. The leaders of this have assured that New Glenn will take flight before this year ends. However, comparisons with the SpaceX event show us that this is an overly optimistic calculation. Former SpaceX engineers say. In Ars Technica They have interviewed several former SpaceX engineers who were active when the 2016 incident occurred. When asked about the work that remains for Blue Origin, they all agree on the same thing. Repairing a launch pad is very complicated and, at best, could take about 12 months to do. More likely, they could extend up to 18 months. Without a launch platform you cannot launch a rocket, so doing so before the end of this year does not seem very likely. The case of SpaceX. “My AMOS-6 scar started itching when I saw the New Glenn video.” With that phrase, Hans Koenigsmann, who was then vice president of construction and flight reliability at SpaceX, expressed the great similarity between that event and what happened to Blue Origin. In 2016 he led the investigation into the causes that led to the explosion. Therefore, you know very well that this is a slow process. They spent weeks searching for pieces of the rocket in the wetlands near Cape Canaveral. They also searched for fragments of the launch pad. They even used drones and underwater robots to find as many of these pieces as possible. With all that, they were not able to access the launch pad for reconstruction until 4 months had passed. They were fortunate that they had another platform at Vandenberg Air Force Base. They just had to adapt it a little, but it was ready in 5 months. However, Blue Origin does not have alternatives. He has to rebuild the launch pad that has already been destroyed. The complexity of launch platforms. Former SpaceX engineers insist that launch pads are complex facilities. They have tall and resistant steel-based launching towers. They also include foundations heavily reinforced with concrete and trenches excavated under the platform to direct and evacuate the gases and flames generated during the launch so that a fire does not break out. In addition, there is a complex electrical system and pipes that flow from propellants to cooling liquids, through purge gases, water for deluge systems and much more. These pipes, in fact, are the most complicated to fix, according to former Space X engineer Trip Harriss. Repairing all of this takes a long time, which also begins to count once it has been determined what happened during the incident. The role of NASA. In his statements to Ars TechnicaKoenigsmann has urged Blue Origin to be transparent with NASA at all times. It is not for less. The US space agency is playing a lot with what happened. The two companies that will bear the burden of the moon landing during the Artemis missions will be SpaceX and Blue Origin. The latter’s lander, Blue Moon, is advancing at a good pace. However, without a rocket New Glenn cannot be carried to its destination. For this reason, NASA has asked Jeff Bezos’ company for explanations from the first moment. However, also have assured that they will support and help the company in everything that is necessary and that, for the moment, They are not looking for alternatives. They are confident that New Glenn will arrive on time. The positive part. For John Muratore, the former NASA engineer who was going to direct the launch of the Falcon 9 in 2016, everything that has happened to Blue Origin also has a positive side. They took advantage of their own incident to redesign their launch pad and introduce improvements that have served them well in subsequent releases. Therefore, Blue Origin must have hope. But also try to be more consistent with the dates. Experts do not seem to agree that it is feasible to launch in 2026. In any case, the rare company, private or public, actually launches when planned. Optimism can help them. Image | Blue Origin/SpaceX In Xataka | Texas has a new city. Until a few days ago, it was only the SpaceX base in Boca Chica

premium range to watch the World Cup, movies and video games

TCL has hit the table in the Spanish market with the arrival of its new flagships for 2026 in the television sector. The company, already consolidated as one of the world’s leading television manufacturers, has just announced the availability of its X11L and C8L series. This is a clear commitment to QD-MiniLED technology, with which they seek to offer an experience that not only rivals OLED in contrast, but far surpasses it in light power and screen diagonal. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links TCL 55C8L Television 55 Inch SQD-Mini LED 4K Smart TV The price could vary. We earn commission from these links TCL X11L: the crown jewel with extreme shine The new TCL X11L It is, on paper, one of the most ambitious bets of the year. This model (available up to 98 inches) uses a sixth generation QD-MiniLED panel capable of reaching a stratospheric brightness figure: up to 10,000 nits. To manage such power without sacrificing detail in the shadows, it has a light control system by extremely dense zones, allowing deep blacks and a drastic reduction in blooming. Some of its key points are the AiPQ Pro processor with Artificial Intelligenceintegrated Bang & Olufsen sound system and a native refresh rate of 144Hz (although it reaches up to 288 Hz in the largest versions) which makes it an ideal TV for users of PCs and latest generation consoles. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links TCL 85X11L Television 85 Inch SQD-Mini LED 4K Smart TV The price could vary. We earn commission from these links TCL 98X11L Television 98 Inch SQD-Mini LED 4K Smart TV The price could vary. We earn commission from these links TCL C8L: balance between performance and large format For those looking for a premium experience but with a more versatile approach, the TCL C8L series is presented as a natural evolution of its best-selling models. Although it maintains the same technology MiniLEDthis model is optimized to offer vibrant and accurate color reproduction thanks to Quantum Dots. Its great attraction lies in the variety of sizesreaching up to 115 inches in its most ambitious version. This TV is designed to be the center of attention in the home, supporting all current HDR standards (Dolby Vision IQ and HDR10+) and offering specific features for games such as Game Master Pro 3. TCL 55C8L Television 55 Inch SQD-Mini LED 4K Smart TV The price could vary. We earn commission from these links TCL 65C8L Television 65 Inch SQD-Mini LED 4K Smart TV The price could vary. We earn commission from these links TCL 75C8L Television 75 Inch SQD-Mini LED 4K Smart TV The price could vary. We earn commission from these links TCL 85C8L Television 85 Inch SQD-Mini LED 4K Smart TV The price could vary. We earn commission from these links TCL 98C8L Television 98 Inch SQD-Mini LED 4K Smart TV The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Why is this an important launch in the Spanish market? With this move, TCL not only competes in specifications, but redefines the scale of home theater in Spain. The brand continues to bet on democratizing the large diagonals (98 and 115 inches) that were previously exclusive projection territory, but with the advantages of a smart panel. Some of the key features of these new TCL releases include: Service life: greater durability against wear and tear of organic panels. Visibility: Perfect for living rooms with lots of natural light thanks to their high brightness. Connectivity: Full integration with Google TV and the most popular voice assistants. Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Rubén Andrés (Xataka) and TCL In Xataka | Best televisions in quality price. Which one to buy and seven recommended 4K smart TVs In Xataka | Best sound bars in quality price. Which one to buy and seven recommended models from 140 euros

We thought that solar parks were a death trap for birds. 19,000 hours of video and an AI have just dismantled the myth

During the last decade, the story of the energy transition has carried a shadow of suspicion. The visual image of a sea of ​​glass and silicon, dark and geometric, made us believe that the installation of large solar parks was equivalent to sterilizing the earth. We imagined a devastated ecosystem, an industrial desert where the hum of transformers chased away any trace of fauna. It seemed the inevitable price to pay for decarbonizing our economy. However, when science has decided to turn off the noise of public debate and turn on the cameras to observe what really happens under those plates, the result has broken all schemes. The AI ​​that watched the sky. One of the deepest fears was the theory that solar panels acted as a lethal mirage for birds. To clear up this mystery, an exhaustive study published in the scientific journal Diversity has resorted to the latest technology. A team of scientists installed high-definition cameras at five photovoltaic plants in the United States (spread across the desert Southwest, Midwest and Northeast) and collected more than 19,000 hours of daytime recordings over several years. Given the human impossibility of reviewing such a quantity of footage, the researchers developed an Artificial Intelligence model (MODT) designed specifically to detect and track moving objects. After filtering more than 4,000 hours of video, AI and human reviewers identified 68,646 bird appearances. An unprecedented find. Not a single bird collision with solar infrastructure was confirmed in all the observations analyzed. Far from colliding or being disoriented by the supposed “lake effect” of the panels, the images showed that the birds integrate the solar plant into their daily lives: they fly over it (an activity that accounted for around 54% of the observations), cross it underneath, look for food on the ground, preen and even nest in the metal structures themselves. More life inside than outside. Crossing the Atlantic, scientific evidence supports this coexistence. According to a study published in AgricultureEcosystems & Environmentcarried out by researchers in Poland, small-scale solar farms located in agricultural environments significantly increase birdlife diversity. After analyzing 43 photovoltaic parks and comparing them with 43 neighboring control areas, Polish experts documented that the vast majority of species improved their presence. Except for the meadowlark, which showed a negative reaction, species typically threatened in rural areas such as the wildcatcher or the northern stonechat appeared in much larger numbers within the park. As the study explains, the facilities provide them with safe breeding areas, tall grass (which is mowed late or left to grow) and fences perfect for perching, singing and monitoring their prey. This reality is identical in our country. As we recently explained in Xataka, Spanish photovoltaic enclosures are acting as authentic sanctuaries. The data collected by the Spanish Photovoltaic Union (UNEF) and audited by the environmental consulting firm EMAT in 2025 show an irrefutable pattern. In Minglanilla (Cuenca), 32 species of birds were found inside the solar plant compared to 19 in the external agricultural area. In Revilla Vallejera (Burgos) the balance was 39 versus 34, and in Trujillo (Cáceres), 31 versus 25. Furthermore, these enclosures not only house common birds, but have become home to protected or seriously declining species such as the curlew, the little bustard or the lesser kestrel. What is the secret of this explosion of life? The answer requires changing perspective. These parks are not being installed on virgin forests, but on fields that have been subjected to intensive agriculture for decades. According to Martín Behardirector of Studies and Environment at UNEF, by building a solar park a de facto “ecological exclusion zone” is created where tractors, pesticides and herbicides disappear. Human silence attracts weeds; weeds to insects; insects to small birds, and these to large birds of prey. The key: active management. If energy companies limit themselves to fumigating the land or sweeping the brushcutter to leave the ground bare for convenience, the park will effectively be an inert desert. For flora and fauna to return, will and active management are required: using native seeds, leaving wild ecological strips on the margins, allowing extensive grazing for natural control of forage and avoiding agrotoxins at all costs. The data has spoken. We had been fearing for years that solar panels would destroy life in the countryside. It turns out that, managed with rigor and sensitivity, they have the exact power to do just the opposite: heal the ecological wounds of centuries of agricultural exploitation and give nature a voice. Image | AnkerSolix Xataka | The largest study to date on solar panels and their effect on the field debunks several persistent myths

In two days the international blockbuster that has restored the luster to the erotic thriller genre arrives on Prime Video

In December 2025, Lionsgate released a psychological thriller based on a self-published novel that had gone viral on TikTok. Paul Feig, known until then for comedies such as ‘My Best Friend’s Wedding’ or ‘Spies’, was in charge of directing it, and the film, starring Sydney Sweeney and Amanda Seyfried, ended up being the biggest box office success for both actresses, the director, and one of the most profitable thrillers in recent years. It is about ‘The assistant’which this Friday the 5th comes to streaming from the hand of Prime Video. In it we will meet Millie (Sydney Sweeney), on parole for involuntary manslaughter, who accepts a job as a live-in maid for a wealthy family. And little else can be said without ruining the experience, because Millie soon begins to detect strange behavior in her boss (Amanda Seyfried) and that the relationship between her employers is not what it seems, in a trotted return to the erotic thriller of the nineties that actually plays as much at being a fast-paced pocket book full of twists and humor as it is an intuitive piece of post-feminist pulp. The film works as a box of surprises where Sweeney and Seyfried shine with two interpretations that seem to have been raised differently: The first is more B-series, the other is more melodramatic. It is this clash of registers that gives a self-conscious and unpredictable touch to the film, and also what makes the genre mixer work at full capacity: serious psychological thriller at the beginning, revenge fantasy later (also changing, for the better, the final stretch of the original novel). ‘The Housemaid’ opened in third place at the US box office with $18.9 million, behind a colossus like ‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ and the animated film ‘David’. It was not a spectacular exit, but its secret was that word of mouth worked and it did not fall: it barely fell from its privileged position for weeks, and it performed very well at the international box office. The final gross was $401.7 million worldwide, against a production budget of $35 million. It is not surprising that the sequel is already in the works. In Xataka | Among the 19 premieres on Netflix this week, the documentary about the trial that Michael Jackson experienced in his final years

A Ukrainian stork has managed to outwit a Russian drone in flight. The video is the best clue about who will win the war

Exactly a decade ago, the Dutch police presented a plan that seemed straight out of a medieval movie: training eagles to shoot down drones in full flight. That project lasted less than a year, because the birds They were too unpredictable and the propellers too dangerous even for them, but 10 years later it seems that they were not so wrong. The stork that left a Russian drone behind. In the middle of a war where Ukraine and Russia compete to automate battlefield, a seemingly trivial video has become an unexpectedly powerful metaphor. what we see: A Russian interceptor drone chases a Ukrainian white stork in mid-flight until the bird suddenly makes a sharp turn, leaving the device chasing shadows. The scene lasts just a few secondsbut it summarizes something much deeper: modern warfare is obsessed with creating machines that imitate capabilities that nature perfected millions of years ago, although we are still far from achieving it. The image is especially symbolic because the white stork is one of the national animals of Ukraine and because the video inadvertently exposes the enormous limitations that many drones continue to have when faced with an enemy as seemingly simple as a bird. The great military obsession. For years, military engineers they try to replicate the capabilities of birds flight. Modern drones can travel hundreds of kilometers, transmit video in real time or attack targets with enormous precision, but they remain much less agile than animals capable of instantly changing the shape of their wings, taking advantage of thermal currents or performing extreme maneuvers without losing stability. The video stork It does exactly that: detect danger, alter its trajectory and escape from a device specifically designed to intercept moving targets. The difference reveals a key problem with today’s autonomous war. Drones still rely heavily on relatively predictable trajectoriesimperfect sensors and reaction capacities much lower than those of biological organisms evolved to survive in the air. Drone warfare as an ecosystem. The conflict in Ukraine has accelerated the evolution of drones to unprecedented levels. Let us remember that at the beginning of the war they were relatively simple reconnaissance tools… and now there are coordinated swarmsinterceptors aerial FPVplatforms long range suicide bombers and autonomous systems capable of searching for targets by themselves. In parallel, the sky begins to fill with absurd situations and almost surreal where birds and machines share the same airspace. In the early years there were trained eagles to shoot down police drones. Today, just the opposite is happening: drones that chase birds because their radar signatures are too similar to those of enemy devices. Some species, such as storks or pelicans, are comparable in size to certain military drones and create enough confusion to cause real errors in combat. Nature is several steps ahead. The episode also leaves an uncomfortable conclusion for the military industry: the capabilities that militaries desperately seek already exist in nature. Birds master something that drones still cannot combine well: agility, energy autonomy, collective coordination and instant adaptation to the environment. An albatross, for example, can travel entire oceans taking advantage of wind currents Without spending much energy, Harris hawks or eagles coordinate extremely complex cooperative attacks. no centralized communicationand storks use thermals to gain altitude practically free. Meanwhile, defense engineers still experience with deformable wings, biomimetic systems and algorithms that allow drones to react with the same fluidity. The result is paradoxical: the more autonomous military technologies advance, the more evident it is that they continue to try to achieve abilities that a bird naturally possesses. A video that says much more. The Ukraine War will probably be remembered as the drone laboratory most important in modern history. Both sides are learning in real time how to automate attacks, saturate defenses and dominate airspace at low cost. But he stork video points towards something even more important: the winner will not necessarily be the one who has the most drones, but rather the one who manages to build capable systems to adapt to the environment with the flexibility of a living organism. Therein lies the great technological race that is beginning to take shape. Armies no longer just want fast or cheap machines, they also want platforms that learn, react, collaborate and survive like animals. And while Russia and Ukraine transform the sky into a permanent surreal experiment, a simple stork has just remembered that nature, for now, continues playing in another league. Image | Jean-Raphaël Guillaumin In Xataka | Ukraine has been terrorizing Russian soldiers with its heavy drones for years. Now they are literally giving it back. In Xataka | The war has entered the phase of mathematics: cheap Russian missiles are destroying the scarce Ukrainian interceptors

Tomorrow on Prime Video, a series with a superb Nicolas Cage that is already said to be Marvel’s best proposal in years

Nicolas Cage was about to don the Superman suit in the mid-nineties, in a Tim Burton production by Warner Bros. that was canceled when filming was already imminent. Decades later, two estimable ‘Ghost Rider’ films, an animated cameo in ‘Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse’ and a very brief multiversal nod in ‘The Flash’ as ​​the Superman that never was are his resume as an actor with a cape and/or mask. ‘Spider-Noir‘ comes to Prime Video this May 27 and makes us dream of an unleashed Cage who restores some dignity to the exhibition of mediocrities that superhero cinema has become. The series is not a spin-off of the Spiderverse films, although Cage voiced Spider-Man Noir in the aforementioned ‘Into the Spider-Verse’. It is based on the comics from the 2009 Marvel Noir line, which relocated the label’s classic characters to an alternate interwar universe. In this version, Cage plays Ben Reilly (not Peter Parker, as in the original comics), a private investigator who ends up becoming a superhero called The Spider. The nickname comes from the heroes who inspired Stan Lee in the creation of the publisher’s first superheroes. Prime Video has released the series in two visual formats, “Authentic Black and White” and “True-Hue Full Color”, i.e. black and white in the style of the thirties and vibrant colors and with an artificial point. It is an unusual decision that, those responsible say, is not free: neither of the two is the “main” one, both have been calibrated and designed so that they function completely and autonomously. The color one, specifically, has sought the effect of an artificially colored black and white film. ‘Spider-Noir’ enjoys a spectacular 92% on Rotten Tomatoesone of the highest scores for any property in the live-action Spider-Man franchise. It is already spoken of as one of the best series of the yearand the interpretation of Cage, lost sometimes (just sometimes) in recent years among products that do not deserve his talent, as one of the most eccentric and stimulating contributions to the MCU. In Xataka | Today the culmination of one of the most famous series in the history of Spain arrives on Prime Video in an ironic closing format

An Atlassian engineer was fired. He then published a video on YouTube explaining how the company works

“I was recently affected by layoffs made by Atlassian and wanted to take some time to reflect on the time I spent working there.” This is how it begins the video that Vasilios Syrakis shared on his YouTube channel. The video, titled “I have been fired by Atlassian” seems to be a criticism of the company. It’s something much better. What has happened? On March 11, Atlassian, the company behind software like Jira or Trello, announced that it was going to reduce its workforce by 10%which translates into about 1,600 street workers. The reason, of course, was AI. In the company’s words: “Our approach is not that AI will replace people, but it would be dishonest to pretend that AI does not change the mix of skills we need or the number of roles required in certain areas.” One of those roles was that of Vasilios. The answer. Instead of recording himself criticizing the company’s decision, this engineer opted for something different. What he did was publish a detailed, 38-minute description of everything he built during the eight years he worked at the company. Your video is a masterclass on How the architecture of a company of the stature of Atlassian works and it serves two objectives: it turns your experience into a common good and at the same time it is a letter of introduction for future jobs. what he did. Vasilios did not have a minor role at Atlassian, but for eight years, he worked on the invisible “plumbing” that connects millions of users to Jira and Confluence. In the video he details how Open Service Broker works, the internal platform he built so that Atlassian teams could publish their services on the internet with one click; also the Sovereign system, which acts as the “brain” of the more than a thousand proxies; and how it rebuilt security so that all internal services inherited the same authentication and attack security without having to write it one by one. The context. In the announcement, Atlassian admits that it is achieving very good results. In February 2026 they published their resultsin which they boasted a 23% increase in their total revenues, which reached 1,586 million, and a 26% growth in cloud revenues. Despite the fact that the company is doing very well, 10% of its staff ended up on the streets, including engineers with roles as important as Vasilios’. As mentioned in the Experienced Devs subredditVasilios is careful and in the video he does not seem to mention confidential information about the company, but instead limits himself to talking about the design of its systems, so it does not seem like they could sue him. At the time of writing, Atlassian has not commented on the video, which already has almost a million views. Image | Vasilios Syrakis, YouTube In Xataka | “They blame AI for layoffs they would do anyway”: Sam Altman confirms that AI has been used as an excuse to lay off

Today the culmination of one of the most famous series in the history of Spain arrives on Prime Video in an ironic closing format

When the series ‘Aída’ ended in June 2014 with four million viewers saying goodbye, no one seriously considered a sequel. A decade later, Paco León turns that reunion into metacinema with ‘There and back’which now premieres Prime Videoa film that functions as another chapter, but also as a question about what it means to revisit something that has not completely disappeared from collective memory. It is clear that the dizzying audience figures for ‘Aída’ belong to another era, when audience fragmentation was not as great as it is now. At one of its peaks, the series reached 33.2% share and 6,282,000 spectators. Throughout its nine years on screen, the series led the audience in its first two seasons; During the 2006-2007 season it was the most viewed Spanish fiction, and in the following season it not only maintained the leadership, but did so above foreign productions. ‘There and back’ arose as a commemoration of the tenth anniversary of the end of the series and twenty years of the original premiere. The filming featured almost the entire original cast (Carmen Machi, Mariano Peña, Miren Ibarguren, Eduardo Casanova, Pepe Viyuela, Melani Olivares, Canco Rodríguez and León himself), with the notable exception of Ana Polvorosa (Lore), who felt that she was not at her best to reprise her role. The twist that no one expected was the one that led the film to merge elements of fiction with metanarrative to show the recording process of an episode, mixing the original characters with the actors themselves giving life to themselves. The narrative axis is Carmen Machi’s resistance to returning to the character, and all this with abundant reflections on the nature and limits of humor, which the original series exceeded on numerous occasions. Can’t you make humor out of anything anymore? ‘Back and forth he does it… and he also wonders why. In Xataka | This Prime Video series ends after 7 years and 40 chapters, making history with an audience more divided than ever

This Prime Video series ends after 7 years and 40 chapters, making history with an audience more divided than ever

Today Prime Video premieres the last episode of ‘The Boys‘. It is not just any ending: it comes with the highest audience figures in the entire history of the series and, at the same time, with social networks converted into a battlefield over whether this latest installment of the superhero satire has been worth it. What is clear is that one of the most ambitious and rounded productions of the recent era of the streaming. ‘The Boys’ was born as an adaptation of the comic by Garth Ennis and Darick Robertson published between 2006 and 2012 and arrived on Prime Video in July 2019 with a brutal premise:what if superheroes were corporate tools with powers of mass destruction? The series created by Eric Kripke immediately connected with a eerily similar political and information climate to the starting point of the series. In the following seven years, the fiction has accumulated five seasons, a spin-off (‘Gen V’) and an expanding universe that turned Patriot, more than a villain, into a disturbing reflection of reality. For a series to reach its conclusion at the best audience moment in its history is not usual. ‘The Boys’ has done it. The fifth season has reached an average of 57 million viewers per episode on a global scale, the highest figure in the entire history of the series. The season is also among the ten most viewed from any Prime Video original series. All this while there has been a more heterogeneous public reception than ever with the series (often praised by critics, but with very combative detractors for its powerful political message). In addition, this season has encountered criticism of its pacing, filler episodes and lack of action. It has been compared to ‘Game of Thrones’ in its controversial final stretch and although Kripke has defended the decisions that have been made, today is the day to check to what extent the series manages to live up to its prestige. In Xataka | 8 premieres this week on Netflix, including a science fiction and mystery series from the creators of ‘Stranger Things’

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.