tested

The CNMV has tested AI to invest in the stock market for ten months. The conclusions are very revealing

by

In recent months there has been a recurring discourse that we see on social networks and that sell us again that “get rich quick” message. That message is “use AI to invest in the stock market.” The interesting thing comes when we see how the CNMV has published a study in which it has precisely attempted to analyze that premise. Although this organization warns of the risks of investing with AI, there is another important message in the conclusions: LLMs are not bad investors per se. They are bad at following vague instructions, which is just how most people use them. The CNMV study. Two researchers from the CNMV, Ricardo Crisóstomo and Diana Mykhalyuk, have published a study methodologically serious (but imperfect) and very interesting: they used four AI models for ten months live, from April 2025 to January 2026. They chose ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek and Perplexity as models. The process was simple but demanding: each month they asked each model to identify the five stocks in the Ibex35 index with the best expected performance (to buy) and the five with the worst expected performance (to sell short). Then the real result was measured at the end of the month, and here there was no historical data selected just because: the real market was the only arbiter of all the functioning of the models. The models evolved. One of the most significant aspects of the study is that its creators recognized a methodological problem that was difficult to avoid: during those ten months, the versions of the four models were updated several times. The Gemini of April 2025 was not the same than that of January 2026for example, and that could influence the results. The researchers commented that it was impossible to know with certainty whether an improvement or deterioration in performance was due to the prompt strategy, market conditions in that period, or simply because the model changed. The prompt is everything. Three were also tested prompt types very different, and that gave rise to conclusions that were neither alarmist nor did they create false expectations: they were “it depends.” Thus, their results showed that everything depended on the type of supervision that these models had: If the LLMs were asked generic questions such as “What stocks should I buy?”, they failed repeatedly. There were computational errors, incorrect interpretations and also the famous hallucinations of chatbots. Curiously, the only one that made a profit was ChatGPT. The problem is that people who use AI to invest probably use this mode of action. But if prompts prepared with iterative reviews and human supervision at each step were used, Perplexity achieved a monthly return of 3.5% on the IBEX35. Gemini and ChatGPT also improved their behavior if given more precise instructions, and DeepSeek was the worst ranked overall. There is another finding: when models receive official regulatory documentation or business results reports, their predictive accuracy improves significantly. The LLMs they reason better on concrete and verified facts than generating analysis from scratch on information that they themselves search for on the web. financial hallucinations. The CNMV study points out that financial markets are especially demanding for AI models because they require complex processes. They have to retrieve and collect information dynamically, they have to reason in multiple steps, they have to be numerically precise, and they have to know this market, and all in real time. Chatbots are trained to generate “convincing” textsso the incentive here is that the investment recommendation “sounds good” even though it is completely wrong. The confidence with which AI models present incorrect financial analysis is proportional to the risk they pose to those who use them without checking whether what they say makes sense. In short: do not trust AI to invest right off the bat. The Reddit user’s experiment was equally striking, but hardly conclusive. Source: Reddit. The Reddit experiment. A Reddit user named Blotter-fyi rode in November from 2024 a platform called Rallies.ai which gave several AI agents access to real-time financial data and money to make stock market operations. Four months later, with the S&P index down 7% since the start, five of the models are outperforming that index, although only two have positive returns in absolute terms. The author himself was the first to warn that four months are insufficient to reach a conclusion: it could be luck, the market or simply the prompt. Nof1’s experiment was fascinating, but it made it clear that AI models don’t typically make money investing in crypto. Source: Nof1. Nof1 and crypto fascination. Another particularly striking experiment was the one that the company nof1.ai made with its Alpha Arena. He put six AI models to compete, gave them 10,000 real dollars each and gave them two weeks to trade cryptocurrency derivatives without human intervention. The most striking result was not who won, but who lost: GPT-5 ended with more than 25% losses and Gemini with close to a negative 40%. Meanwhile, the Chinese models Qwen and DeepSeek dominated in terms of good performance. They iterated with other models, 32 in total, and of all of them only six achieved a positive return: the rest lost money. Grok-4.20 was the big winner ahead of GPT-5.1 and DeepSeek v3.1. Maybe you shouldn’t just let AI invest for you. The conclusions after these experiments are clear. Four months of a model outperforming the S&P index in a bear market does not prove that AI is a good investor. Only in that specific period, with that specific marketthat model made decisions that turned out to be less bad than those in the index. To see if this makes sense takes years, multiple market conditions, and many instances of the same experiment running in parallel. The same happens with Nof1 – especially short – and with a more serious and methodical process like that of the CNMV, which was also surrounded by events whose impact on the final result was uncertain. Faced with so many unknowns, the conclusion seems clear: … Read more

Ukraine has tested whether Russia was complying with the ceasefire with an optical illusion in the open field. The video is self-explanatory

by

during the call Christmas Truce In the First World War, enemy soldiers came out of their trenches, exchanged gifts and even played soccer games in no man’s land, in one of the most unusual episodes of the conflict. That scene, as brief as it was unexpected, showed to what extent war can change shape in a matter of hours. A ceasefire on paper. Russia had announced a ceasefire for Orthodox Easter with a strong symbolic and political component, seeking to project an image of negotiating will in the middle of war. However, on the ground the reality has been very different, with thousands of violations recorded in just 32 hours, including artillery attacks, assaults and a massive use of tactical drones. Although long-range attacks were reduced, information arriving from kyiv They point out that the intensity on the near front was maintained, reflecting a dynamic where pauses are used more as a narrative tool than as a true attempt to stop the fighting. The war of stories. Both Moscow and kyiv tried to position themselves as the party that respected the truce, in a conditioned diplomatic pulse also due to international pressure, especially from the United States. While Russia defended having complied with the ceasefire, Ukraine documented thousands of violations in a matter of hours, showing an obvious gap between the official discourse and what was happening on the battlefield. This duality reinforced the idea that truce announcements are part of a communication strategy as much as the war itself. The unexpected test: an optical illusion. In this context, Ukraine decided to go beyond the accusations and designed a direct test to check Russian behavior: evacuate apparently own soldiers, unarmed and wounded, complying with all the conditions of a ceasefire. It turns out that, in reality, it was Russian prisoners in disguise with neutral uniforms, used as a kind of “visual bait” to verify whether the agreements were respected. The scene functioned as a kind of terrifying optical illusion on the battlefield, where what looked like a legitimate evacuation hid a carefully prepared experiment. The video that dismantles the truce. The outcome was so fast as forceful: because a swarm of Russian drones attacked the evacuees, killing several of them without knowing that they were actually their own captured soldiers. The episode, recorded on video and broadcast Later on different social networks, he crudely exposed the fragility of the ceasefire and the inability (or lack of will) to respect it even in situations clearly protected by the rules of war. Beyond the tactical impact, the incident became in a visual test difficult to refute about what was really happening on the front. An episode that also leaves everyone in a bad light due to the crudeness of the visual piece. An impossible truce. If you also want, the set of events confirms that the ceasefire was, in practice, untenable in a conflict where both parties seek to maintain the military initiative while competing for the international narrative. For Russia, the test reveals the extent to which modern combat (based on the intensive use of drones, quick decisions and targets detected without full verification) can turn against him even in sensitive situations. For Ukraine, the test not only highlighted Russian non-compliance, but also showed the extent to which the battle has entered a phase where even humanitarian gestures can become in strategic tools. In this scenario, the truce was nothing more than a nominal pause in a war that continues to develop with the same intensity under a layer of unfulfilled promises. Image | x In Xataka | If fog was deadly in Ukraine’s winter, spring is offering Russia a key advantage: greenery In Xataka | Ukraine is close to what no one has achieved in a war: shooting down missiles for less than a million dollars

OpenClaw is the AI ​​agent that is blowing the AI ​​industry’s mind. We have tested it: Crossover 1×42

by

ChatGPT and Claude are great, but they only do things when you ask them to. OpenClaw It’s something else. It is an AI agent that takes advantage of the power of ChatGPT or Claude (or other models) He becomes your personal employee and does everything you ask of himbut in an autonomous and proactive way. This is something that the industry has been promising for years, and although some steps had already been taken in that direction with AIs that, for example, can reserve a table for you in a restaurant, OpenClaw goes a little further because you basically “give them the keys to the office”. So, when you install it on a machine (or a VPS, or a Raspberry Pi, or a Docker container, or wherever you want) you give this AI agent superpowers, because it will be able to do everything it wants on that machine. You will be able to use all the apps you have, browser included, and use all those tools to do things for you. It is, we insist, like having an employee who works for you 24 hours a day and who, if you don’t want to, will never rest. The concept is super powerful, but of course it has some buts. The most important one is security risks, and in this episode we talk about how to protect yourself so that that virtual employee doesn’t end up messing you up and causing chaos. We also have to talk about costs, because this AI agent is a true “token glutton” and you will have to be practical when choosing which models you want to use it with. We talk about all that and many more things in this episode Crossover 1×42, which serves as an introduction to a fascinating topic. Be careful, this is addictive. On YouTube | Crossover In Xataka | OpenClaw changed the rules of the AI ​​race. Technology companies already have their answer: copy it

has tested its humanoid robot in a real factory (and there is video)

by

For years we have heard the same promise: humanoid robots working side by side with us in factories, warehouses or even in our homes. It’s an idea that appears again and again. However, when we go down from that stage to the ground of a real plant, the story changes quite a bit. There it is not enough to walk or grab objects; everything must happen precisely and be repeated many times without errors. In that context, each small advance begins to have a different meaning. The latest news from Xiaomi. Lei Junfounder, president and CEO, posted a message on his official WeChat account to update the status of the company’s robotics project. The executive explains that a humanoid robot developed by the company has already begun “doing practices” within one of its automobile factories. The manager also links to a published technical article describing the first tests carried out with the robot under factory conditions. Let’s see. What exactly has the robot done in the factory. According to the text, The humanoid robot has been put to the test in a very specific position within the automobile manufacturing process: placing self-tapping nuts on parts of the vehicle’s floor. In practice, the system collects these nuts from an automatic supply equipment and deposits them in the positioning tool where the automated screwing of the position is then carried out. The Chinese firm places this operation in the pressure casting workshop, on ground components after that process. Three figures that help understand the test. Xiaomi explains that the humanoid robot performed this work for three hours of continuous autonomous operation within that position. In that period, it achieved a success rate of 90.2% in the simultaneous placement of the nuts on both sides of the piece, a percentage that the company defines as the number of correct operations compared to the total number of attempts made. Another fact that stands out is the work pace, since the system managed to adjust to a production cycle of up to 76 seconds. This is an important fact because in an industrial line, each operation must fit into very specific times so that the process does not break down. behind the scenes. Xiaomi points out that its humanoid robot is based on the Xiaomi-Robotics-0 model, described as a VLA-type model that integrates vision, language and action within the same system. According to the company, this approach makes it easier for the robot to understand the tasks it must perform, perceive its environment and execute the movements necessary to complete them. The training is also complemented with reinforcement learning, a technique that allows the system to improve its behavior based on the experience accumulated in the physical world. The faults that the robot can find on the line. In its technical description, Xiaomi also points out several scenarios in which the operation may fail. One of the main problems appears during the alignment process between the self-tapping nut and the positioning pin, which must be well centered and seated before screwing can proceed. If this fit is not precise enough, a blockage may occur during the process and the assembly remains incomplete. Additionally, the orientation of the nut inside the robot’s hand can vary with each grip, and the company cites factors that complicate adjustment, such as the knurled structure inside the nut, the magnetic attraction force of the pin, and, in some cases, environmental interference or working angle limitations. The predecessor. To better understand this advance, it is worth remembering that Xiaomi has been exploring the field of humanoid robots for some time. In 2022 the company presented CyberOnea prototype that appeared at one of its events showing basic capabilities such as walking or holding objects. At that time the company itself made it clear that it was a project in an early stage of development. What we see now seems to be situated in another type of scenario: less demonstration on a stage and more tests within a plant, where the objective is to check if these machines can respond to the demands of a repetitive process. Looking to the future. The company also hints that this experiment is just one part of a larger project. Xiaomi points out that it is testing its humanoid robots in various jobs within the factory, including box transport tasks and operations related to the installation of exterior elements of the vehicle. In fact, in his WeChat post, Lei Jun states that the company wants to contribute to the deployment of humanoid robots in smart manufacturing and proposes a medium-term forecast. According to his estimate, in the next five years there could be large quantities of these machines working in his factories. Images | Xiaomi In Xataka | Huawei presents its AI supercluster to the world: it is a nod to Chinese Big Tech and a message to NVIDIA

China has just tested the Fujian with three different aircraft. Electromagnetic catapult is no longer theory, it is practical

by

The cover of an aircraft carrier has always been a tension scenario: each takeoff is a millimeter choreography that combines steel and noise. For more than six decades, that scene was dominated by steam. Now, with him Fujianthat script is also written with electricity. We do not talk about an experiment behind closed doors, but of a public demonstration on deck with several different aircraft, the type of test that records that the electromagnetic catapult is operating in real conditions. The demonstration was not accidental. Coincided with the acts by the 80th Anniversary of Victory in the War against Japan and World War IIwhere prominence also passed through the sea. According to the Ministry of Defensethe Fujian served as a platform for three different models: the J-15T and J-35 and the KJ-600 early alert plane. The three performed cares assisted by catapult and land cable landings, marking a new chapter in their preparation. What was tested. According to Xinhuathe training phase served to check the interaction between the electromagnetic catapult, the braking system and different types of aircraft. The Navy explained that the exercises confirmed the “good compatibility” of the teams and that the Fujian already has the capacity of “full initial deck.” In practice it means that you can organize launch and recovery operations sequenced, preparing the land for a broader integration of its embarked wing. From steam to electromagnetism: For a long time, the steam catapults marked the take -off routine on the aircraft carriers. The EMALS American system introduced a paradigm shift: instead of pressure steam, it uses accumulated electric power and converted into a launch force. It is already installed in the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), first aircraft carrier to incorporate it. The US Navy ensures that It offers greater acceleration control, less wear on airplanes and cover and ability to boost light drones to heavy fighters. The transition reduces maintenance and opens the operational range. Three aircraft, three mission. The J-15T is the evolution of a veteran naval hunting, adapted to operate with catapults. Its role is to ensure the continuity of the aviation embarked while more advanced models arrive. The J-35, on the other hand, represents the jump to the fifth generation: a furtive hunt with greater scope and modern sensors. The KJ-600 trio completes, an early alert plane designed to expand the combat group and coordinate operations to hundreds of kilometers. Where is the Fujian today. The aircraft carrier began its sea tests in May 2024 and, since then, it has followed a progressive calendar. Systems and stability check settings have been made, while rehearsing cover operations. The latest exercises show that the ship has an initial capacity to operate with different aircraft, but has not yet reached the level of full operability required by an aeronaval group in long -range missions. Only two with Catapult EM. To date, only two armed ones have managed to integrate electromagnetic catapults into service aircraft carriers. As we point out above, the United States operates electromagnetic catapults in the Gerald R. Ford and China class has demonstrated its operation in the Fujian. These experiences place both armed in a high technological category, while the rest of the countries continue to use steam systems or lack catapults. It is a milestone that reflects the investment and industrial development scale necessary to get here. What changes on deck. Electromagnetic catapult opens a range of possibilities that were previously more limited. It allows drones or light aircraft with the same security as a great tonnage, and does so with less vibration and mechanical stress. For the crew, the work environment is quieter and less hot. In practice, it means that the aircraft carriers can sustain a greater number of daily exits with less maintenance between operations. Of the test at the service. The maneuvers carried out this month do not yet equate to have a fully operational aircraft carrier. The Fujian is still in an early phase: he needs to accumulate many more hours of sea and certify maneuvers in diverse conditions before being able to hold a embedded wing in the campaign. The Ministry of Defense speaks of a milestone, but also recognizes that it is missing. The transition from the demonstration to real capacity will be gradual and will depend on how systems respond in more demanding scenarios. The Fujian has gone from being a project wrapped in speculation to an aircraft carrier that shows on deck how its electromagnetic catapult works. The achieved this month is a visible milestone, although still partial. China thus enters a small club in which each electric takeoff is much more than a technical gesture: it is a declaration of intentions. The future will say how long it takes to convert these maneuvers into the routine of a fleet capable of operating with continuity on the high seas. Images | Ministry of National Defense (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) | In Xataka | For years the Airbus A380 symbolized European power against Boeing. Today it survives as a colossus without the kingdom

Ana Boria has tested all her effort just before the expected trip

by

When we think of Domotize our house The first thing that comes to mind is that it will be a great idea. And probably it is. Who has not dreamed of automating daily tasks and controlling devices from the mobile? The promise is clear: to make our lives easier. However, when it is time to put it into practice, unforeseen events appear. And that is where the real challenge begins: to overcome obstacles for the plan to meet. A good example is in our series’Domotize or die in the attempt‘, Available in the Xataka YouTube channel. In this chapter, Ana Boria He faces a challenge with a deadline: Leave everything prepared before leaving honeymoon without worries. The main protagonists are two feeders Xiaomi Smart Pet Food Feederalthough they are not the only ones. As already anticipated in the previous episodewill also try to install a presence sensor on the terrace and an irrigation system for plants. All under the watchful eye and comments of your partner Angela Blanco. The question is inevitable: will it get it? A trip to counterreloj: leave the house under technological control before going on a trip One of the strengths that Ana of smart feeders stands most is their ability to weigh the exact ration of feed. A key detail for those who live with several pets that do not eat the same. “The right -wing feeder is always that of the cat and the one on the left that of the cat. So this work we have done. Now it is simply that they get used to this what gives them eating every x hours,” he explains. Everything painted well after Unboxing. Remove them from the box, configure them in the living room and then take them to their final place. Until the first problems arrived: “No, it is restarted, but it does not enter Wi -Fi mode, which I should do and I don’t know why and I don’t know what else to do. In the other it has worked.” The typical situation in which you are convinced of having followed the manual to the letter and still something fails. Luckily, the solution was close. The action then moved to the terrace. On paper, installing the movement sensor seemed simple. In practice, not so much. “What happens is that it needs food and I only have one plug Here on the terrace that is here behind the column, ”Ana details. Relocating it was an option, although it was not simple either.” A lot of people passes here, especially in summer, and we will have to limit very well the Mapita of this sensor so that it does not give us or false positives and it works well. “I had to check if the system responded as it should. And, surprise! At that moment Angela put the humor note with a direct comment: “But look, what would be of this series of videos if Ana got the whole first?” The closure of the chapter returns us to the terrace. He had to refine the irrigation system. Ana began to make accounts to calculate with precision how she should work. But once again everything did not go to the first. Had to move the site pump to fulfill its function. Before the expected trip, with the idea of ​​leaving everything under control, Ana spent a week at her family’s house. There he advanced a detail that leaves the intrigue served: “There is good news and a bad one.” To know what happened, The answer is in the video. The question is clear: did you get the house dominated before the honeymoon? We invite you to discover it and tell us your experience, both here and on YouTube. Images | Xataka In Xataka | For years I have had YI security cameras. His app has become so insufferable that I have gone to competition

A Chinese program has tested the safety levels of Chinese cars. He has evidenced Chinese cars

by

China has received a blow of reality. This is Kyle Chan’s opinionexpert in Chinese industry, who summarizes the position of Tesla on the rest of the Chinese companies in terms of safety of their ADAS systems. The Tweet is motivated by a Chinese program that has faced 36 cars to the same exam to check how 15 obstacles were solved. The result: 216 accidents and a much higher position of Tesla. So superior that Elon Musk’s cars have not only obtained the highest score, they are also the only ones who have successfully solved five of the six major scenarios under which the tests were encompassed. But, in addition to all this, there are many other interesting diatribes. All tests were published on television since they were carried out by the media DonGchedi. It is not just a sample of the lack of Chinese cars is also a touch of attention to their own manufacturers. Frightful results China is living a revolution in the car market. There is no doubt about that. They have electric cars with the highest technological load in the world and live in a competitive bubble so strong that it threatensLeave multiple brands aheadwith the most settled by launching a Aggressive Price War. But in addition to having the car equipped with the fastest electric charge or the best incorporated drone, Chinese manufacturers They have been presuming exceptional autonomous driving capabilities. In fact, ourselves in Xataka We have been able to check firsthand how a car of less than 10,000 euros to direct change, such as Byd Seagullcan move with total ease with the famous Eye of God less advanced. Despite this, the Chinese government has been launching messages to manufacturers warning them that they cannot sell promises that they cannot meet later. That is why he has imposed fines to those who offer their products showing videos or presuming an advanced autonomous driving that then has many asterisks. It is one of the reasons why Autonomous driving was the great absent In the last presentation of Xiaomi Yu7. And the ears pull has finished exemplifying the tests performed by the Chinese media DonGchediwhose video and a half video It can also be seen on YouTube. It shows the examination that 36 cars have passed, the vast majority of them Chinese cars, who have faced 15 risk situations encompassed in six large groups. The result has been fateful. The Chinese car with the best score has been the GWM Wey Lanshan, obtaining the third best score and saving furniture in three of the six large groups. Specifically, he acted correctly avoiding an accident when he found an unexpected obstacle on the road, with the appearance of trucks in works areas or when a second vehicle appeared completely detained by surprise. He suspended with the appearance of other obstacles in works areas, when a second vehicle cut his trajectory aggressively or with the appearance of a wild animal. Similar results (exceeding three of the six scenarios) have also been obtained by the XPEng G6, Aito M9, Luxeed R7 and De denza Z9 GT EV, from better to worse score. Below, all the remaining cars (29 of 36) have not solved more than two risk situations. And of those 29 suspended cars, another 15 have failed to overcome even one of the proposed scenarios. Some, in fact, have only faced four risk situations because they lacked the necessary equipment to face these tests. The Mercedes Class C and the Volkswagen Passat are among these 15 cars that have failed to overcome a single test. But there are surprises among the suspended. The eighth classified is the Aion RT, a Chinese car that has not managed to overcome more than two tests. Just ahead of TOYOTA BZ3Xthe next non -Chinese car (With its nuances) that is in the test and that next to Tesla is the only one that sneaks among the 10 best. If we can talk about “the best” for cars that have not exceeded four of the six proposed tests. They are cars that, despite everything, have been better classified than the Xiaomi Su7 (and also that its ultra version, which has obtained worse results yet), six byd cars (both under the firm byd and some of its luxury brands) or those expected in Europe, the leapmotor C10 and the XPEng P7 (which are sold in Europe) or the expected Zeekr 001O EV. You can see all the list in Carnewschina. A good ear pull The publication of the evidence is not accidental and is especially relevant. In the post with which we opened this article, Kyle Chan highlighted that Tesla is living her own “Chatgpt moment”. The company It has been criticized by Do not include lidar radars in their cars that should improve their performance. However, it has proven to be ahead of all its competitors. The Tesla Model 3 and Model and They are the only ones who have achieved Save successfully almost all tests. The electric Berlina only suspended when faced with the appearance of a wild animal while model and did overcome this problem but acted in an inconvenient way in the scenarios in works. In spite of everything, Chan defends on his tweet that the results highlight the true situation of Chinese technology, although manufacturers try to demonstrate that they are much more advanced. For Chan, that the tests were broadcast on television are a clear government call to the manufacturers, something that begins to be common after an accident of an Xiaomi SU7 that had activated the ADAS systems for semi -automatic driving was recorded. Hu Xijin, former newspaper editor Global Timeswhich is dependent on the Chinese Communist Party and, therefore, it is understood that it is an extension of the government’s communications, pointed out That the results of the tests were good for local manufacturers because they position them where they really are. Understand that it is a good time for Chinese brands to learn what Elon … Read more

Ireland tested a basic income of 1,300 euros for 2,000 artists. It has gone so well that now they do not want me to end

by

The last of the experiments we had heard about that idea of ​​receiving money every month without conditions, also called basic income, It happened in Germany. The test consisted of 1,200 euros per month to 122 participants and the results contradicted many of the topics that we usually hear around the proposal. Ireland has been the next stop, about to finish another unprecedented test: basic rent, but for art. A salary for the artist. The story It began in 2022at which time Ireland launched one of the most significant pilot programs of basic income aimed at the cultural sector, granting 2,000 artists and art workers an unconditional weekly income of 325 euros, 1,300 euros per month. For three years, without performance or consideration requirements, these beneficiaries enjoyed unusual economic stability in the artistic world, allowing them to fully focus on their creative work. The initiative, promoted by the then Minister of Culture, Catherine Martinhe was born in response to acute precariousness after the pandemic and was a total investment of 28 million dollars In the sector. Now, as the end of the program approaches in August, the beneficiaries and their defenders face the uncertainty of the return to financial insecurity, while the voices that claim their extension and conversion in a permanent policy of universal basic income grow. Creative freedom. But there is much more. A prepared report By sociologist Jenny Dagg, from the University of Maynooth, collects the testimony of more than 50 participants and reveals deep effects that go far beyond economic relief. Admission allowed artists to experience, assume risks and fail without constant fear of poverty, which raised quality and originality of its production. At the same time, many reported substantial improvements in their Emotional well -beingincluding better sleep, less anxiety and renewed confidence in their professional career. The ability to devote time to thought, research or innovation, before a luxury, became creative routine. For many, the program was the first real opportunity to imagine a long -term viable artistic career, without sacrificing dignity or health. A sociocultural laboratory. He Irish pilot It has also become a world reference in the midst of the growing debate on the future of employment in the face of artificial automation and intelligence. With technological leaders such as Elon Musk and Sam Altman advocating the need for a universal basic income in response to mass labor disruption, the Irish experience It provides concrete evidence that a guaranteed income does not discourage work, but enriches it. While other similar initiatives in the United States or Germany have been more limited, Ireland opted for a sector that, although not always lucrative, is essential for the symbolic and emotional fabric of any society: art. In this context, driving organizations such as Ubi Lab Network either Basic Inome Ireland They argue that no more evidence is needed: the positive impact is already demonstrated. The dilemma of the return. And as in almost all these experiments, there is an end. With the conclusion of the program in sight, many participants They express fear Given the possibility that their progress and stability are faded. The concerns on how to maintain the creative impulse without that economic mattress extend through all artistic disciplines. The Minister of Culture, Patrick O’Donovan, He has recognized The value of the pilot and has promised to thoroughly evaluate its results before proposing new measures, although there is still no certainty about possible extension. Meanwhile, promoters insist that basic income is not only an economic policy, but a essential tool to deal with the multiple crises of the present (economic, social and ecological) returning time, agency and health to those who create, interpret and enrich the cultural life of the nation. Lessons Thus, and although the future of this Irish basic rent It is still uncertain, its impact has already left a fingerprint in the lives of thousands of artists and in the global debate on the value of unconventional work. Far from becoming a mere experiment, the program has shown that giving people a minimum of security can release their maximum potential. If you want also, in a world that is vertiginously approaching a New and unpredictable Technological revolution, the question that Ireland poses is not so much if we can afford to implement a basic income, but, perhaps, if we can really allow ourselves. Image | Pxhere In Xataka | Germany has successfully tested the vital basic income of 1,200 euros: they improved their training and changed jobs In Xataka | Sam Altman has been giving millions of dollars in secret. Its objective: the biggest study on universal basic income

If you have heard a roar at Teruel airport it is because PLD Space has just tested the new Miura 5 rocket engine

by

A thermal chamber pointing to the test table of PLD Space At Teruel Airport, he has witnessed the first tests of the Treprel-C engine, the heart of the Spanish rocket Miura 5. Wake up, Miura, wakes up. PLD Space engineers have moved the first engines of the new Treprel-C family to the test zone for a series of integrated hardware trials. With these tests, the preparations for the flight rating campaign finalize, with which they will valid the design and tolerance of the motor to integrate it into the rest of the rocket. As Pld Space has advanced In his X profilethe new manufacturing technologies of combustion cameras that they have tried have “very good look”. A jump to the big leagues. The launch of Miura 1 served to validate all kinds of processes and technologies Internally developed, but the Miura 5 engine is much more complex. We talk about a two -stage orbital pitcher, designed to Place satellites of up to a ton In equatorial orbit. With a height of 35.7 meters, Miura 5 needs five teprel-C engines to rise. The engine is a direct evolution of the technologies validated by Miura 1 with an important qualitative leap: it is a turbobombic fueled engine in which the reliability apart from performance prevails. Treprel-C. The new Treprel engine (acronym for “Spanish technology for reusable spatial propulsion for pitchers”) generates 190 kn of thrust at sea level: 950 kN in total for the first stage of the Miura 5. The second stage of the rocket carries an optimized version for the vacuum. These engines, with a height comparable to that of a person, presume to have the combustion chamber of liquid propellant developed by a commercial company with private capital in Europe. They feed on RP-1 bioquerosen and liquid oxygen. Manufactured in Elche. The new PLD Space plant in Elche, 12,500 square meters, is designed to produce up to six MIURA 5 and 60 Treprel-C motors per year, which gives an idea of ​​the project ambition. The company’s facilities at Teruel airport have become, since Miura 1, in the epicenter of static tests. At the end of 2024, PLD Space lifted a 20-meter test tower for cryogenic and pressure test tower, and has built a test bench capable of trying three treprel-C simultaneously. The debut of Miura 5 is scheduled for early 2026. Images | PLD Space In Xataka | The “first private rocket in Europe” has been vacant and someone is getting hollow: Miura 5 of Pld Space

A company tested the four -day work week. Now your workers think it is best to work seven days

by

The debate on the Reduction of the working day It is more alive than ever and many countries are reconsidering their working day model with alternatives such as four -day work week. Lumena small Cardiff SEO services consultant, tested the four -day work week obtaining outstanding results. However, his CEO, considered that the idea could still be improved, so he decided to go one step further and try a model even more flexible: Work seven days a week. From the four -day week to 32 hours. As Aced Nelmes, CEO of Lumen, counted In his LinkedIn profilethe company had changed its four -day workday for a 32 -hour. The difference can be underestimated, in that change the elimination of an important barrier is implicit: the company will not impose if its employees have to do those 32 hours In a certain number of days or at a certain schedule. It will be the employees themselves who decide when to work. According to his CEO, two years ago, Lumen implemented the four -day work week. The results exceeded all expectations: staff rotation fell to zero, productivity increased and employees felt more rested and committed. According to Nelmes, “our workers reported to be happier, have better health and be more productive.” But the model It could be improved. Seven days to meet your day. “The idea of ​​the 32 -hour week is to go further in the flexibility offered by the four days,” Nelmes explained. In the system proposed by Lumen, the only condition is that employees meet their projects and objectives, managing their time with total autonomy. Nelmes clarified in statements to The confidential that “what I require is a lot of self -discipline, capacity for concentration, self -regulation, initiative and independence.” The company seeks workers capable of directing their own time and offering the best of themselves. “I think we microstal the day -to -day life of our workers, we assume what kind of day they should have to be productive. My argument is that it is not, we do not know, and we need to delegate that decision in each individual,” said the young manager to El Confidencial. The exception: meetings and training. According to The publishedby him Financial Timesthe only exception to the total flexibility of Lumen is the time that the company dedicates to Team meetings in which the mandatory projects and formations are defined. Together, the CEO ensures that they do not exceed three hours per week. This guarantees the connection and coordination of the team without sacrificing individual autonomy. For all others each of the employees distributes their work week with total labor flexibility and No entry or exit schedules. Results and surprises. During the three months of proof of this new flexibility model, Nelmes observed that, in reality, the employees did not make major changes in their schedules. Most had routines similar to conventional ones, adapting only small details to enjoy personal activities. “People like to have routines and structure, so many … still prefer to move within a standard schedule,” explained the CEO to The confidential. The flexibility had limited itself to adapting their working hours to certain personal activities (playing sports, medical appointments, etc.) or to coincide with The schedules of their childrenand then recover that time at another time of the week. According to Nelmes, the most extreme case is that of one of its employees, who took advantage of that flexibility to adjust their rest days during the week according to the climate or their personal needs. Then, I worked on Sunday, because it was the time when I found greater concentration and less interruptions. Flexibility with clear values ​​and limits. As has counted The CEO, this model does not imply total disconnection of the company. Lumen takes great care of your team to ensure that everyone shares Commitment values and responsibility. “We would not hire someone who only wanted to work 16 hours in two days,” says Nelmes. In fact, the manager assures that they have had to leave people who did not adapt to this level of freedom and demand. The objective is to allow employees to have enough flexibility in their workday to be carried out as people and take care of their familieswhich also helps them save in nurseries, cleaning or extracurricular activities. According to Nelmes, “if you let your employees be good parents, they will also be good employees.” The company seeks to attract fathers and mothers, convinced that flexibility improves both productivity and the quality of life. An adaptable model, but not for all. Although the manager ensures that the results obtained by his staff have been positive, he acknowledges that this model is not viable or For all companies Not for all sectors. Consultants, banks, law firms or marketing companies can benefit from this approach since they allow combining the flexibility of teleworking with the organization by objectives. However, it acknowledges that it is a difficult implementation option in sectors such as the manufacturing industry, construction, the hospitality or tourismwhere physical presence and fixed schedules are inherent to the nature of work. In Xataka | Spain already has its first municipality with four -day work week. It is not in Madrid or Barcelona, ​​but in a corner of Cádiz In Xataka | Three Spanish companies tell us how it has gone after implementing a job utopia: the four -day week Image | Lumen

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.