mind

OpenClaw is the AI ​​agent that is blowing the AI ​​industry’s mind. We have tested it: Crossover 1×42

by

ChatGPT and Claude are great, but they only do things when you ask them to. OpenClaw It’s something else. It is an AI agent that takes advantage of the power of ChatGPT or Claude (or other models) He becomes your personal employee and does everything you ask of himbut in an autonomous and proactive way. This is something that the industry has been promising for years, and although some steps had already been taken in that direction with AIs that, for example, can reserve a table for you in a restaurant, OpenClaw goes a little further because you basically “give them the keys to the office”. So, when you install it on a machine (or a VPS, or a Raspberry Pi, or a Docker container, or wherever you want) you give this AI agent superpowers, because it will be able to do everything it wants on that machine. You will be able to use all the apps you have, browser included, and use all those tools to do things for you. It is, we insist, like having an employee who works for you 24 hours a day and who, if you don’t want to, will never rest. The concept is super powerful, but of course it has some buts. The most important one is security risks, and in this episode we talk about how to protect yourself so that that virtual employee doesn’t end up messing you up and causing chaos. We also have to talk about costs, because this AI agent is a true “token glutton” and you will have to be practical when choosing which models you want to use it with. We talk about all that and many more things in this episode Crossover 1×42, which serves as an introduction to a fascinating topic. Be careful, this is addictive. On YouTube | Crossover In Xataka | OpenClaw changed the rules of the AI ​​race. Technology companies already have their answer: copy it

International law was written with humans who decide in mind. AI just broke that chain and no one knows who answers now

by

Pete Hegseth’s threat to Dario Amodei has a subtext that goes far beyond the $200 million contract that the Pentagon can cancel: If the US military deploys AI-controlled autonomous weapons without the safeguards that Anthropic requiresyou will have removed the only firewall that has historically prevented an illegal order from being executed. Why is it importantand. The entire legal and ethical system of the US military rests on a principle that seems obvious but has important consequences: a soldier can and should disobey a manifestly illegal order. It is the mechanism that, in theory, prevents war crimes. A drone AI-controlled autonomous vehicle does not have that mechanism. You can’t refuse. You can’t hesitate. He cannot be tried in a court-martial. Between the lines. Amodei speaks of “autonomous weapons that fire without human intervention” to point out a legal vacuum. If an AI makes the decision to kill, who is responsible criminally? The programmer? The general who activated the system? The president who signed the order? International humanitarian law (including the Geneva Conventions) was written with human beings making decisions in mind. And now AI dissolves that chain of responsibility. The backdrop. The mass surveillance argument is also a bitter pill to swallow. The Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution protects citizens from warrantless searches and interventions. It works, among other reasons, because the State has never had the physical capacity to process everything that happens in public spaces. And in the same way, with AI that operational limit disappears: we move to millions of conversations recorded in real time, transcribed, classified and connected in just seconds. What was previously impossible due to lack of human resources becomes routine with a LLM. Constitutional protection until now has depended, in part, on the inefficiency of the State, its limitations. Yes, but. The Pentagon has an argument that cannot be ruled out: other democracies are also developing these capabilities, and China or Russia are not going to wait for the United States to resolve their ethical dilemmas. The practical question is whether having those unrestricted capabilities makes you safer or simply more dangerous to your own citizens. The big question. OpenAI and Google have accepted the Pentagon’s conditions“all legal uses” without specific exceptions, and xAI has just been cleared to operate on classified systems. Anthropic has been left alone in its position. And what is at stake now is not whether Claude survives as a military supplier or not, it is whether the AI ​​industry is going to set some limit on what it sells to the State, or whether that debate will be settled directly by Congress, the courts or, in the worst case, the first serious incident that no one could have foreseen. It seems like a matter of time. In Xataka | AI is already a battlefield: Anthropic has just accused DeepSeek and other Chinese companies of “distilling” Claude Featured image | Xataka

Sprout has been designed with another goal in mind

by

Humanoid robotics has been feeding the same promise for years: the more a robot resembles a person, the more useful and more natural it will be at our side. That is why we have learned to associate humanoids with increasingly stylized bodies, increasingly realistic movements, and an aesthetic that seeks to erase the border between machine and assistant. However, this race towards similarity is not the only possible direction. In this context, proposals have begun to appear with a different objective: to design robots that do not try to impress with their strength or agility, but rather with their ability to be safe and approachable. the robot. Fauna Robotics has introduced Sprouta humanoid robot with a different approach than the one that usually dominates the conversation. Instead of promising a “person robot,” the company insists on something more concrete: building a humanoid capable of being close to people and functioning safely in human spaces. His idea is that the future of robotics is not only played in the factory, but in homes, schools, offices and places of passage, where interaction matters as much as mechanical capacity. And there, they maintain, the resemblance to a human being is not everything: to earn a place in that environment, Sprout needs to move with control, avoid dangerous situations and communicate in an understandable way, with gestures and signals that invite you to approach, not to move away. Soft, human-scale design. Sprout measures 107cm and weighs 22.7kg, compact enough for one person to move and handle. That scale is not accidental. Fauna Robotics describes it as a lightweight, quiet and soft-touch robot, with a padded exterior that prioritizes safe contact. The company ensures that the design avoids pinch points and sharp edges, two important details when a robot shares space with humans. And he finishes the idea with an unusual decision in this category: an expressive face, with articulated eyebrows and a facial LED matrix that is not there to decorate, but to communicate intention. In detail. The automaton has 29 degrees of freedom, that is, a high number of possible joints and movements to walk and manipulate objects. He also builds a computer based on NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin with 64 GB of memory and a 1 TB SSD, designed to execute perception and control on board. In sensors, it includes stereoscopic vision, several depth sensors to measure distances and an inertial sensor in the torso for orientation and balance. In locomotion we talk about legs with 5 degrees of freedom and low-impact feet. The battery is interchangeable, with between 3 and 3.5 hours of autonomy. Instead of delivering a body and letting the buyer figure out the rest, the company says its humanoid already integrates ready-made movement, control, and social behaviors, as well as perception, navigation, and mapping to operate in the physical world. To this he adds conversation guided by interaction and dynamic expressions, which are the basis of his “social” approach. It is a way to lower the entry bar: if the robot already moves, orients itself and reacts, the developer’s job becomes the interesting one, creating applications, testing voice interfaces or exploring new forms of human-robot interaction. Designed for others to build on top of. Fauna Robotics’ strategy with Sprout is, for now, less “home robot” and more “tool for creating robots.” The company first offers it as a platform for developers, researchers and universities, a type of buyer who often ends up stuck in the same bottleneck: having a good idea, but not the budget or time to build a complete humanoid. Sprout seeks to resolve that starting point. Fauna presents it as a modular canvas on which to develop manipulation, task planning and interaction, with an almost community approach: someone solves a problem, shares it, and the next team can focus on the next step. A new category? If we look at the most well-known humanoids, it is quick to see that shape is only part of the story. Atlas, from Boston Dynamics, stands out for its electric version aimed at industrial uses. Optimusfrom Tesla, moves in the field of general purpose, with the idea of ​​taking on repetitive or unsafe tasks. Figure 02from Figure AI, also targets industry and commercial workforce, with tests at a BMW plant. In China, Unitree pushes democratization with the G1, a low-priced humanoid aimed at education and research, while Walker S2, from UBTECH, It is already being tested on the border with Vietnam. In Europe, Neo (Beta), from 1Xrepresents the ambition of a safer home robot. Sprout falls close to that last idea. Price and availability. Sprout does not present itself as a consumer robot, and that also shows in how it is offered. Fauna Robotics frames it within an edition aimed at creators and developers (Creator Edition). As for the price, it is offered for $50,000. From there, it is advisable not to fill in the gaps: the company does not detail a public calendar for mass deliveries nor does it propose, for now, a deployment for homes in the style of an appliance. Images | Wildlife Robotics In Xataka | Google had a practically unsolvable dilemma with AI and its search engine. So you have chosen to create a subscription

Madrid had a plan to put all cars without a DGT label off the road in 2026. It has changed its mind

by

In 2024 it was December 12. In 2025 it was December 11. 20 days after all cars without a label were prohibited from entering the city of Madrid, the capital’s City Council has once again confirmed that those who are registered in Madrid will be able to continue driving for another year. That is to say, like last yearwith less than three weeks left before the ban would exclude unlabeled cars registered in Madrid and those registered outside the city, the City Council has extended the extension that will allow them to continue circulating. So, who can and cannot circulate in Madrid? What does the great ZBE that is now Madrid look like? In September 2024, a figure began to move: 1.2 million cars circulating in Madrid were going to be left out if the ban on any car without an environmental label circulating in the capital was activated, as planned, in 2025. This figure was, as we contrast in Xatakafalse. Or inaccurate, at least. In reality, the Madrid City Council estimated that there were 246,000 vehicles that were going to be left out of circulation in the city. This year, The figure that had moved was 300,000 cars which does not seem real because it would imply that the vehicle fleet of gasoline with more than 25 years and diesel with more than 19 years has grown in the city in the last year. In fact, Borja Caravante, delegate of Urban Planning, Environment and Mobility, has assured that prohibiting the circulation of cars without environmental label of registered in Madrid would only affect about 14,000 or 15,000 vehicles, according to words collected by The Country. The Madrid City Council alleges, therefore, that the measure would have a “low impact” and that they therefore prefer to extend the exception to the rule. Whatever the vehicles may be, the truth is that if the ban were applied, no car without a label could circulate in the capital, regardless of whether or not the car is registered in the city. And the thing is, right now, the only cars without a label that can circulate in Madrid are those registered in the city. That is, it is not enough to reside in the capital, it is necessary that the car be registered in the city. If not, there is no possibility of moving with a car without a label except for few exceptions, such as going to a hotel in the city. In summary, right now there are two possibilities for cars without a label and they will remain active next year: If the car is registered in Madrid: it can circulate If the car is not registered in Madrid: it cannot circulate In addition, it must be taken into account that cars without a label (whether or not they are registered in the capital) cannot enter the Central District Special Protection Low Emission Zone (what was previously Central Madrid). Only cars with an environmental label can enter this space. Of these, in addition, the B and C labels have the obligation to park in a parking lot, so only the ECO and Zero emissions vehicles have total freedom of movement. If you want to know more details, in this Guide to know if your car will be able to circulate through the Madrid ZBE in 2026 We clarify all these concepts. Photo | Jordi Moncasi and NuKi Chikhladze In Xataka | The intrigue of cars with the DGT B label: what we know about whether or not they will be able to enter large cities

Elon Musk has been refusing to take SpaceX public for 20 years. His new obsession has changed his mind

by

If there is something that Elon Musk has been repeating since before Starship was called Starship, it is that SpaceX would not go public until the gigantic Martian rocket was flying regularly. The excuse was that Wall Street likes short-term profitability plans more than multi-generational plans to colonize Mars. But the script has changed: SpaceX is preparing its jump onto the stock market, and not to pay for the trip to the red planet. He does this because he needs a lot of capital for “something more” than Starship and Starlink. The largest IPO in the United States. As revealed BloombergSpaceX plans to launch a Public Offering in late 2026 or early 2027. The company is seeking a valuation of $1.5 trillion (trillion, on an American scale) and more than $30 billion in cash, dizzying figures that would be the largest IPO in the history of the United States, close to the global record set by Saudi Aramco in 2019. Musk has been leaving breadcrumbs in X for days about this change in strategy. When the first rumors leaked about a financing round that valued the company at 800,000 million, the tycoon denied itclarifying that “the valuation increases are based on the progress of Starship, Starlink… and one more thing, which is possibly the most significant by far.” What is that thing that makes another round of investment insufficient? Orbital computing. What is clear from Musk’s latest tweets is that SpaceX wants to raise a lot of cash with its IPO for more than just Starship and Starlink: to develop space data centers. The logic, that Musk himself considers validis the same one that other companies like Google are following, but with the advantage of being the largest rocket launcher in the world. On Earth, AI data centers have two major bottlenecks: power and cooling. In space, satellites can receive sunlight 24 hours a day without atmospheric interference and with the possibility of dissipating heat on the dark side of the satellite, eliminating complex water systems and air conditioning of the Earth. Beyond Starlink. SpaceX already has a constellation of 9,000 satellites in orbit, many of them interconnected by laser links. The plan would be to take advantage of all the knowledge and technology that the company has to create a new constellation of localized AI: in Musk’s words, the cheapest way to generate AI bitstreams in less than three years. Their roadmap is hard science fiction: scale up to adding 100 GW of capacity per year using high-bandwidth lasers connected to the Starlink constellation itselfwhich is already highly profitable. And from there we move on to factories on the Moon and the use of electromagnetic rails to launch these AI satellites without the need for rockets. The umpteenth gold rush. Figures like Sam Altman, Eric Schmidt either Jeff Bezos They are already moving to have their piece of the pie in the orbital data center business. Google created the Suncatcher project and Nvidia collaborates with Starcloudwhile smaller startups like Aetherflux have announced projects like “Galactic Brain” planned for 2027. The difference is that SpaceX has the launch experience and is building the largest rocket in the world, with the peculiarity that it aspires to be completely reusable. It’s just the beginning. If 1.5 trillion is already a historic valuation, a recent report by ARK Invest projects that by 2030, SpaceX’s enterprise value could be around $2.5 trillion in a base case scenario, driven almost entirely by recurring revenue from Starlink and declining launch costs thanks to Starship reusability. Going public in 2026 would not just be a financial operation: it would give SpaceX the capital it needs to become the backbone of AI computing infrastructure, turning an internet service like Starlink into something that Musk himself considers “much more significant.” Images | SpaceX In Xataka | Building data centers in space was the new hot business. Elon Musk just broke it with a tweet

one mind now controls everything

by

On the Ukrainian front, air supremacy is no longer decided in combat between fighters, but in continuous interaction among swarms of droneshuman operators and jamming systems electronics that transform the contact line into a space of algorithmic warfare. FPVs, initially seen as improvised weapons, have become the main system of death and attrition: around 80% of casualties on land it comes from them. It happens that the conflict has pushed Ukraine towards a change more typical of a science fiction movie. The new war. Yes, the scale of the conflict has pressured Ukrainian forces into a qualitative change: moving from individual missions to structures where a single operator coordinates multiple aircraftconverts previously manual tasks into semi-automated processes and, above all, introduces the ability to pit drones against drones, in a low-cost air defense designed to counter the Russian saturation with Shaheds, decoys and missiles. Squadron Commander. This is where a new name emerges. The Pasika system, developed by Sine Engineering and already operational in Ukrainian units, transforms the figure of the drone operator into something never before seen in a war: a single human being which can plan, launch and monitor multiple FPV platforms from a unified interface. Instead of constant manual piloting, Pasika allows to predefine mission zones, routes and attack points, and switch video between drones without losing control. Its essence is not to replace the human, but extend your capacitylightening the cognitive load under stress and allowing attention to focus on target selection and tactical coordination. The key lies in its architecture resistant to electronic warfare: Sine.Link provides encrypted transmission and alternative navigation when GPS is interfered, while terminal guidance modules They allow you to fix targets and free the operator to manage the next drone. The result is a multiplication of efficiency: three to five times more operational performance with the same human resources, on a front where the shortage of specialists is as critical as that of ammunition. Automation against wear. In addition to precision attacks, Pasika enables functions previously unthinkable in volume: automated delivery of supplies when the ground is too dangerous for vehicles, silent reconnaissance missions in radio-off mode and anti-tank mine placement using predetermined patterns. The logic is always the same: reduce human exposure, increase cadence and sustain tactical pressure. A crucial component is modularity: More than a hundred Ukrainian manufacturers have integrated the systems into their models, indicating an expanding industrial ecosystem and an interoperability doctrine accelerated by the urgency of war. The future vision is clear: logistics boxes that they store dozens or hundreds of drones and launch them automatically when activated, with no personnel present. Drone-based defense. In parallel with this increase in offensive capacity, Ukraine is preparing to scale the production of interceptor drones up to 600–800 units per daywith the explicit goal of fighting swarms with swarms. These fast quadcopters are designed to pursue and destroy Shaheds and other Russian drones in flight, at a cost of between $3,000 and $6,000 per unit, compared to hundreds of thousands or millions it costs a conventional anti-aircraft missile. Russia is trying to overwhelm defenses by launching waves of cheap devices combined with guided missiles, and the only sustainable response is low-cost, distributed air defense. In that sense, Ukraine already has shown results: some models of interceptors managed to shoot down nine out of ninety drones attackers in a single night, and Zelensky claimed that 150 shootdowns had occurred in a context of 810 enemy drones. It is not just about volume, but about the ability to respond in a modular, flexible and continuous way, in a reasonable cost band for a country exhausted by years of total war. Swarms against swarms. The combination of systems like Pasika and the mass production of interceptors changes the very structure of combat. The traditional equation (more soldiers, more artillery, more platforms) is being replaced by the relationship between operators and disposable air units. The question, therefore, is no longer how many weapons each side has, but rather how many platforms each operator can manage and how resistant the communications network is under interference. If Ukraine manages to stabilize the manufacturing and deployment of these systems, the intensity of the drone war will increase, but so will the army’s ability to sustain operations without depending exclusively on human reserves, increasingly more difficult to move. First war where the hand does not shoot. Thus, the war in Ukraine is inaugurating a new military paradigm in which victory depends less on raw power and more on the ability to integrate sensors, links, partial autonomy and efficient operators in flexible structures. Plus, the figure of the solitary pilot disappears: in its place emerges the swarm coordinatorthe distributed node manager, the operator who manages dozens of machines remotely. If you also want, what is at stake is not only the Ukrainian front, but the war model that will define the coming decades: a battlefield where air superiority no longer belongs to whoever has the best planes, but to whoever can put more eyesmore wings and more simultaneous decisions in the air, at the lowest possible cost. A first war where the winning hand is not the one that shoots, but the one that coordinates. Image | Sergei S., Ministry of Defense of Ukraine In Xataka | The latest image of a Russian camouflage can only mean one thing: Ukrainian drones are spreading terror In Xataka | Russia’s latest tactic is the closest thing to a magic trick: By the time Ukraine realizes it, the Russians are already behind it

Your mind can activate a loop song without asking you permission. Science knows why he does it … and why he doesn’t know how to stop

by

You are silent. Walking down the street, serving a coffee, looking distracted by the mobile. And suddenly … there is again. A melody you have not chosenbut who insists on returning. As a drop in the tap, as a notification that you cannot deactivate. In my case, it is the same song for a couple of days. Always the same part, as if the rest did not exist. It does not bother me, but it has made me think: why does this happen? Does our brain make sense, sometimes it works like a striped disk? What is exactly an Earworm. The Earworms – Also called “ear worms” – they are musical fragments that are installed in the head and repeat themselves again and again, without you chosen. The term comes from German Ohrwurm And today describes a mental phenomenon as recognizable as elusive. It is not something weird: As the National Medicine Library of the United States collectsup to 98% of the western population has ever experienced them. Most live them as a simple anecdotebut for some people they can become annoying or even distressing. We speak in a very specific way of spontaneous mental activity that science has been trying to understand. Why do some songs stuck. Earworms are the result of a combination of musical and neurological factors. The themes that are most repeated usually have simple structures, fast tempos and easy to hum melodies. This was revealed by a study led by musicologist Kelly Jakubowskiwhich analyzed more than 3,000 songs and found that those who stayed in their heads tended to have common melodic contours and a medium tempo faster than the rest. Among the most mentioned songs such as Earworms in Jakubowski’s study and his team, several Anglo -Saxon pop hits stand out. It is no accident: the work was done in the United Kingdom with English -speaking participants, so most of the topics that appear are in English. Even so, many of them have been true global successes, also known by the Spanish public: ‘Bad Romance’ – Lady Gaga ‘Can’t get you out of my head’ – Kylie Minogue ‘Don’s Stop Believin’ ‘ – Journey ‘Hoilebody That I used to know’ – Gotye ‘Moves Like Jagger’ – Maroon 5 ‘California Gurls’ – Katy Perry ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ – Queen ‘Alejandro’ – Lady Gaga ‘Poker Face’ – Lady Gaga The decisive occurs in the brain: the auditory cortex – the same one we use to listen to real music – is reactivated even when we simply imagine a song. The emotional state also influences: stress, distraction or nostalgia can open the door for a melody to be installed without prior notice. Auditory cortex Some minds are more prone to loop. Not everyone lives the Earworms the same. Some people barely notice them, while others suffer with intensity, as if the brain stayed in a loop. In most cases, Earworms are lived as a simple curiosity or even as something entertaining. But when the repetition becomes persistent and annoying, it can be a sign of something more serious. According to psychiatrist Srini PillayProfessor at Harvard’s Faculty, “these persistent loops can be associated with obsessive-compulsive disorders, migraines, unusual epilepsies, palinacousis, stroke or cerebral metastases.” It is not usual, but it can happen. What to do if you don’t want to keep listening to her. There is no magic formula to eliminate an EARWORM, but there are strategies that help. Curiously, try to block the song It is the least effective: the more struggles against her, the more she clings, a phenomenon described by Daniel Wegner as “ironic process.” Instead, accepting it without resistance usually works better. As the Kennedy center collectssome people choose to listen to the complete song; Others replace it with another melody. There are specialists who point to chew gum To interfere mental repetition. And you, what song isn’t you going from your head? Since I started investigating the Earworms, the song in my head has not disappeared. Now I know that I am not the only one, that there are reasons behind and that, deep down, that loop is part of how our brain works. And you? Have you ever had an Earworm that you couldn’t take off from your head? What was that song impossible to erase? Do you have any technique to take it off? We read you in the comments. Images | Xataka with Gemini 2.5 Flash | Amanz | Kennedy Center In Xataka | I put myself in the hands of some “sleep headphones” in the hope of reconciling sleep. It has come out regular

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.