SpaceX

paying 920 million a month to SpaceX

by

Elon Musk created SpaceX for space exploration, reducing costs related to transportation and ultimately colonizing Mars, but what he has found is a vein on Earth: Google and SpaceX They just signed a lucrative agreement of infrastructure that puts Elon Musk’s space company at the center of the enterprise AI ecosystem. Among other things, because it is not the first agreement it has signed of this type: in May it already made same with Anthropic. Bottom line: Google is going to pay SpaceX almost a billion dollars a month to lend it computers. It may be a simplification, but it is not an exaggeration: SpaceX has tens of thousands of the most powerful graphics cards in the world in its data centers and Google urgently needs them so that its artificial intelligence continues to stand up in the AI ​​battle. 920 million dollars a month. That is the agreed price for the rental of part of its processing capacity, specifically 110,000 Nvidia GPUs, CPUs, memory and related components, from October 2026 to June 2029. That is, approximately $30 billion over the life of the contract. The rollout will be progressive, so until its entry into force in October, Google will pay a lower rate. To put the movement in perspective, Jensen Huang, revealed As of October 2025, the company had shipped a cumulative total of 4 million Hopper GPUs (H100 and H200) and 3 million Blackwell GPUs since its launch. The 110,000 GPUs in the Google and SpaceX contract are equivalent to what Nvidia ships globally in about a week at the current production rate. Why is it important. Because it is a reflection of the current state of the race for AI: Google is a company with plenty of financial and technological muscle. Without going any further, Google together with Amazon and Microsoft control more than 60% of the global cloud infrastructure market, according to data from Synergy Research (yes, with a 14% share in cloud infrastructure (IaaS/PaaS), it is the third in contention). And still it is not enough: TechCrunch collects the statements from a Google representative explaining that demand for Gemini Enterprise has even exceeded their expectations. For SpaceX, the impact is tremendous: the space launch company has managed to partially and on the fly convert itself into a cloud infrastructure provider. The agreement also comes at the perfect time: one week before its shares begin trading on the Nasdaq. Documentation provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission reveals that Musk’s company intends to raise $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion, the largest IPO in history. Context. As we mentioned in the intro, the agreement reached between SpaceX and Google is similar to the one reached with Anthropic at the end of May and by which the company led by Dario Amodei agreed to pay $1.25 billion per month until 2029 to rent all the available capacity of the Colossus 1 data center in Memphis, Tennessee. As a curiosity, this center was initially built by xAI, now integrated into SpaceX. Alphabet, Google’s parent company, is investing ruthlessly. Already is committed more than 180 billion dollars to spend on technological infrastructure in 2026 alone and has announced an expansion of 80 billion more. The agreement with SpaceX is the bridge while it materializes. In detail. As with the agreement with SpaceX, there is a cancellation clause: if it fails to provide access to the number of GPUs committed by September 30, 2026 (just one day before the full deployment takes effect), Google can either accept the number provided with a reduction in that quota or cancel everything. Likewise, both SpaceX and Google can terminate the agreement simply with 90 days’ notice after December 31, 2026. Important: Google retains all intellectual property of its AI models, content and data even if they run on SpaceX servers. SpaceX puts in the machinery, but doesn’t have access to what’s inside. Yes, but. The cancellation clause puts a possibility on the table: that SpaceX cannot provide those 110,000 operational GPUs before September 30, 2026, something essential to close this lucrative agreement under the terms described. This agreement with Google and the previous one with Anthropic put an obvious conflict of interest on the table: SpaceX is an infrastructure provider for two of the big rivals of xAI and its Grok models, so Elon Musk finds himself in a curious situation: he is the one who decides which infrastructure he gives up and which one stays. We do not know which SpaceX data center will be for Google and Musk has already indicated, according to TechCrunchthat Colossus 2 is reserved for xAI. In Xataka | The most worrying sign for Google: its own AI engineers prefer to use Anthropic AI In Xataka | Who is really winning the AI ​​race, in a graph that puts Google in trouble Cover | dvids and Flickr

SpaceX wants to reach a capitalization of 1.75 trillion dollars. Analysts are clear that it is worth less than half

by

SpaceX’s is the first of the record-breaking IPOs that are expected this year: it will take place on June 12, 2026 under the symbol SPCX. This operation promises to be the most important public offering of shares in history, and the company has already indicated that its objective is to obtain funds worth $75 billion to achieve an astronomical valuation of 1.75 billion euros. But how SpaceX is valued is one thing, and how analysts value it is quite another. Overrated. The financial analysis firm Morningstar has carried out an analysis of SpaceX’s financial accounts and have reached a striking conclusion: “We believe the company has been significantly overvalued and investors will have the opportunity to buy the shares at more attractive levels after the IPO.” Or what is the same: they advise not participating in that initial IPO, and waiting because they anticipate that the stock will fall in the first days on Wall Street. It’s only worth half. In these conclusions, Morningstar establishes that the valuation discounting SpaceX’s cash flow is $780 billion. That represents 48% than the valuation of the private market, which is 1.5 trillion dollars, and 44.5% less than the valuation attributed to the company itself, which amounts to 1.75 trillion dollars. Is it really more promising than Nvidia? Dan Coatsworh is one of the main analysts at the firm AJ Bell, and he commented on CNBC how that theoretical internal valuation of $1.75 trillion would mean that the value of SpaceX (P/E, Price to Earnings ratio) is 67 times its sales, two times more than, for example, happens at Nvidiathe most valuable company on the planet today. Beware of xAI. One of SpaceX’s theoretical strengths is its artificial intelligence division, xAIbut analysts explain that in reality its theoretical advantage is “undetermined”, and in fact they pose it as “a material threat of value destruction” for the parent company, SpaceX. Morningstar believes that the AI ​​division is worth $170 billion, and that what really matters is something else. The Starlink engine. SpaceX’s real argument for going public and its real strength is not the reusable Falcon 9 rockets, but the profitability of Starlink. The company’s satellite constellation has achieved sustained cash flow in recent months, and its global customer base is growing at an enviable pace. It is undoubtedly SpaceX’s great recurring revenue generation machine. Morningstar values ​​it at $611 billion. The double class trick. SpaceX plans to sell shares at a fixed price of $135 per share, but they will only list 3% of the total shares. In addition, Elon Musk will continue to maintain tight control of the vote with 85% of the total through a dual-class share system. Class A shares, those that go public, allow the right to one vote per share. Class B shares go to the founder and the first key investors. They are not sold on the open market, and each one usually gives 10, 20 or more votes. Institutional dependency. The value of the company, however, is supported by the contracts it has with the US government. Specifically with NASA and with the Department of Defensewhich depend entirely on SpaceX systems for their critical missions. That not only guarantees long-term income, but is a compelling argument to attract more conservative investment funds. Either you believe Elon, or you don’t. We are facing an operation that will test Elon Musk’s real power over the markets. Although SpaceX is an extraordinary company, it is overvalued due to its founder’s habit of selling hype. The tactic of coming out as an indivisible package (Starlink + xAI + Image | Xataka with Magnific In Xataka | Elon Musk knows that TSMC is overwhelmed: Terafab is his idea to completely change the global chip industry

The most ambitious US military project in space has a new owner: SpaceX

by

The United States Government has hired SpaceX to act as the backbone of its military telecommunications system. After several delays of an initial system, based on the participation of multiple companies and entities, it has now been decided to bet all data transport on Elon Musk’s request. Starshield satellites. Although the technical details have not been announced at the moment, this agreement between the Pentagon and SpaceX is possibly based mainly on the contracting of Starshield services, satellites with technology similar to that of Starlink, but adapted to military applications. The space company It already has hundreds of these satellites in low Earth orbit, some of them involved in actions such as attacks on Iran. A system made up of layers. The hiring of SpaceX, in which 2.29 billion dollars have been invested, is aimed at the development of the backbone. That is, the central layer of the data transport system used by the United States for military purposes. This system consists of more layers, in which more companies will intervene, which will be in charge, for example, of tracking. However, everything revolves around the axis constituted by Elon Musk’s satellites. The functions. With all these contracts, the United States intends to facilitate the tactical communications of the US Army thanks to access to broadband communication services worldwide. In addition, the aim is to work on the detection and tracking of missile launches and, in turn, connect sensors and shooters. In short, SpaceX must provide the backbone of a system composed of sensors that detect possible threats and a network that communicates these threats as quickly as possible to anti-missile systems and shooters so that they act accordingly. Other companies. While SpaceX will focus on data transportation and the cohesion of all actors involved in the United States military plan, other companies will be in charge of tracking. In recent years, the Space Development Agency hired for it to L3Harris Technologies, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Rocket Lab, all companies that have already begun developing satellites for this purpose. On the other hand, the last three, together with York Space Systems, they had been hired also for transportation purposes, similar to those that have finally been entrusted to SpaceX. At the moment it does not seem that the development of its own satellites has been cancelled, but the change in strategy, much more focused on SpaceX, is clear. Concerned legislators. Despite the intervention of other companies, legislators have expressed concern about the decision to put all the transportation and telecommunications eggs in Elon Musk’s basket. Given this situation, the spokesperson for the United States Space Force has assured who are already looking for a second contractor to build Space Data Network satellites. At the moment it is only SpaceX’s task, but they intend to increase competition. SpaceX’s duties. As they point out from Ars TechnicaElon Musk’s company is obliged to deliver a “prototype of fully operational capacity” for its telecommunications system before the end of 2027. With this, SpaceX diversifies its work, entering fully into the military field. Is this surprising? The truth is, not too much. Now all that remains is to see how it swims in these waters in which He had already made his first dives. Image | US Space Force photo by Gwendolyn Kurzen/Diego González (Unsplash) In Xataka | Once again, Ukraine has opened a missile launched by Russia. Once again, surprising manufacturers have been found

what SpaceX needs to figure out before thinking about the Moon

by

Finally, after several postponements and even a scrub During the countdown, flight 12 of the SpaceX Starship has been able to take place. Elon Musk’s company has considered it a success, taking into account its complexity and everything that could have failed. However, it should be noted that it has been a partial success. The performance of the Starship S39 has been very good, but the Super Heavy B19 rocket has had some incidents. So many that they end up disintegrating upon re-entry into the atmosphere. Logically, this implies that there is a lot of work to do before the next flight. Which went well. The launch occurred successfully at 22:30 UTC (00:30 Spanish peninsular time) on Friday, May 22. It was achieved reach a thrust of 8,240 tons, double that achieved by the SLS rocket that NASA is using in the Artemis program. Even the acceleration was greater than expected. The separation of stages occurred properly and the ship fulfilled what was expected, landing in the Indian Ocean as planned. The release of Starlink mockups traveling as payload on Starship was also properly carried out. What went wrong. One of the biggest innovations of Starship Flight 12 was the introduction of version 3 of its Raptor engines. There were a lot of hopes for them, but some have not worked as well as could be expected. The first failure occurred 1 minute and 42 seconds after takeoff, when one of the outer ring engines of the Super Heavy rocket shut down. This consists of 3 central motors, an outer ring with 19 motors and an intermediate one with 11. The failure in the outer ring was already a relevant incident, but it was not the worst. The separation of the two stages occurred at 2 minutes and 30 seconds and precisely there it was seen how the ship’s 6 engines partially burned the surface of the rocket. At that point, the Super Heavy’s engines began to turn on, but some did not activate. 8 seconds later, one of the engines in the intermediate ring exploded, affecting several of the engines surrounding it. With the entire engine system damaged, only 5 of the intermediate ring engines were ignited during the return burn, so the rocket was unable to brake properly during reentry, which occurred at 1,450 kilometers per hour. The rocket disintegrated and what was left of it impacted the ocean 300 kilometers from the place planned by SpaceX. There were also failures on the ship. Although most of the failures occurred in the Super Heavy rocket, there was also an incident with the engines of the Starship ship. This consists of 3 vacuum engines in the center and 3 sea level engines around it. The difference between them is that those in the center are prepared to operate in conditions of spatial vacuum. Since there is no atmospheric pressure, They can have larger nozzleswhich allow greater thrust with the same fuel. On Starship Flight 12, one of those 3 engines shut down early, so to compensate, it was necessary to keep the sea level engines on for longer than planned. At least it was a mistake that SpaceX engineers were able to correct. Most of the failures were concentrated in the engines And now what? As SpaceX has pointed out, this has been a partial success. There have been many points of the mission that have gone perfectly, but it is clear that there is a lot of room for improvement. To begin with, some questions should be asked, such as whether the shielding system that the engines previously had had prevented the explosion that caused the rocket to disintegrate. In version 2, the external piping system It left the engine so exposed that each of them had individual shielding. In version 3 this shielding has been considered unnecessary when improving that space plumbing system. However, it is clear that it will be a point to review. On the other hand, it will be necessary to study step by step the on and off systems that have not worked properly. Next challenges. On upcoming flights, SpaceX will have to meet several challenges. The first will be to demonstrate the possibility of doing an orbital ignition. It was planned to fire one of the engines individually in orbit, as it is a key step for orbital insertion and controlled returns to Earth. Unfortunately, given the problems that were occurring with the engines, the plan was finally cancelled. On the other hand, it remains a challenge rocket recoverywithout disintegrating. And, finally, we will have to try to make these vehicles quickly reusable, as the Falcon 9 is now. In short, Starship flight 12 has been a success, but there is a lot of work ahead. SpaceX should not rest on its laurels if it wants to stay alive your lunar dream. Image | SpaceX In Xataka | SpaceX is preparing the largest IPO in history: the fact that it is doing so right now is no coincidence

SpaceX tests Starship V3 with improvements that will change the lunar race

by

SpaceX is about to make a very important flight to complete its path to the Moon. Next May 19 (although it will already be May 20 in Spanish peninsular time), Starship flight 12 will take place. In it will try version 3both from the Super Heavy rocket and from the Starship itself. This third version includes new improvements, which will be vital for many of the future projects of Elon Musk’s company, but above all to become the main private partner that will take the next batch of astronauts to land on the Moon. Write down the date. On May 19, at 6:30 p.m. EDT, (12:30 a.m., Spanish peninsular time), will be launched Starship version 3. This ship is one of the two candidates to dock with the Orion capsule of the Artemis mission and facilitate the landing of two astronauts on the Moon. At the moment it competes with Blue Origin, whose candidate ship is advancing at a very good paceso it is very important that this mission be completed successfully. The improvements. Starship version 3 includes many improvements. For starters, the first phase of it, the Super Heavy rocket, will be a little higher. In its last flight it measured 71 meters, while now it will reach 72.3 meters. It will also carry 250 more tons of propellant, reaching a total of 3,650 tons of methane and liquid oxygen. Continuing with the fuels, its innovative internal conduction system has been redesigned to ignite the 33 engines at the same time and maneuver better. Finally, it should be noted that it includes 3 large aerodynamic control grilles, instead of 4 smaller ones, and that it has a hot separation structure that facilitates the recovery of the rocket. More about engines. The 33 Raptor 3 engines will replace the 33 Raptor 2 engines, resulting in a thrust of 280 tons each. In version 2 it was only 230 tons. The result will be a total rocket thrust of 9,240 tons.. On the other hand, they are lighter engines, so, despite incorporating improvements in their thermal protection shield and fire suppression system, the set is less heavy. Ship improvements. In addition to the improvements on the Super Heavy, the Starship will also include major technological advances. For example, its new orbital maneuvering engines will allow the approach and docking maneuvers in orbit that will be so necessary with Artemis to be carried out. It can remain in orbit for up to 48 hours without solar panels and carry a load of 100 tons to it. Version 2 could only carry 35 tons. This time, the Raptor engines are much more powerful Journey to quasi-orbit. Like the rest of Starship’s flights, this one will take the ship to something known as quasi-orbit. It means that, although it will be a suborbital flight, energetically it will remain very close to the real orbit. In simpler terms, the ship is ready to go into orbit. However, these tests are aimed at analyzing its reliability. Until this is confirmed, SpaceX does not want to risk leaving a 135-ton object wandering in low orbit. Guardian Starlinks. One of Starship’s missions in the future will be to continue contributing to increasing the Starlink satellite fleet. Therefore, on test flight 12 will fly with 22 models of these satellites. He will not take them with the rest, but will release them on a trial basis. Although two of these will also have an important mission, since they will be in charge of analyzing the behavior of the thermal study and taking photographs. This system has a series of dark tiles, which must be kept in place for its proper functioning. Therefore, to ensure that satellites are capable of detecting errors, some tiles have been painted whiteas if they weren’t there. It is a fictitious test error. If they do not locate it, modifications will have to be made. The end of a short but intense journey. Since it is the first test of this new version, there will not be a recovery on Earthbut the two phases will land for later collection. If all goes well, a landing could be tried on the next flight. Step by step. There are many new things to try. Images | SpaceX In Xataka | The launch pads are saturated for all space companies. For all but one: SpaceX

SpaceX faces a neighborhood rebellion in the heart of Texas

by

SpaceX bases its success on repeating, repeating and repeating. Only in the month of May there are six launches scheduled. But that’s not all, testing of engines and other components carried out at the company’s industrial complex in McGregor, Texas, is the order of the day. Therefore, it is not unusual that more than 150 citizens from South and Central Texas have sued Elon Musk’s company for damage to their homes. Cracks in the walls and shattered glass. In total there have been two group demands. One of 80 South Texas residents and another that includes 77 people residing in the center of that same state. In all cases they complain about the damage caused by the shock waves from the SpaceX tests. Neighbors warn of cracked walls, broken window glass and continuous vibrations. One of the owners even claims that his house has suffered serious damage to the foundation.. A question of engines. The McGregor Test Center is the most active rocket engine testing facility in the world. That is where SpaceX tunes up the Raptor and Merlin engines that propel its ships into space. The problem is that they are very powerful motors, which are firmly connected to the ground. For this reason, as they point out in one of the lawsuits, “kinetic and acoustic energy cannot be spent raising a vehicle into the atmosphere.” Rather, “it is propelled violently outward through two destructive paths: an acoustic wave that hits aboveground structures or a sustained seismic tremor from the ground that physically shakes the underground foundations of homes.” Up to two million dollars. In total, each of the two lawsuits, filed in the 414th State District Court in Waco, asks for up to $1 million in compensation from SpaceX for damages to Texan neighbors. At the moment, Elon Musk’s company has not made any statements to the media. From a city of its own to friction with neighbors. Initially, SpaceX advertised its facilities as a job and even identity opportunity for Texas residents. Your Starbase reached the category of cityfor all the people, many of them workers, who lived in the surrounding area. But what happened recently shows that, in reality, SpaceX has more and more detractors among people who live near its facilities. It is not for less. Seeing how the home that costs so much to obtain is in danger is not a dish of good taste for anyone. From employees to neighbors. In recent times, SpaceX has also received many lawsuits from employees. To avoid them, the company has managed to be classified as an air transport company, since this allows it to be regulated under the Railway Labor Law and, in the process, make it much more difficult to file a complaint or carry out a strike. In short, Elon Musk’s space agency has given employees the slip, but can it do the same with its private Fuenteovejuna? Image | MagnificentGage Skidmore In Xataka | SpaceX is preparing the largest IPO in history: the fact that it is doing so right now is no coincidence

Anthropic has just left behind Claude’s biggest burden. He has achieved this after sealing an alliance with Elon Musk’s SpaceX

by

There are few things more frustrating than finding a tool that fits almost exactly what we need and discovering, just as we’re starting to get the most out of it, that we can’t keep using it at the same rate. Claude It has earned a prominent place among those who use artificial intelligence to program, analyze documents or work with demanding tasks, but it has also drawn a very specific complaint: its limits of use. We are not talking about a minor annoyance, but rather a friction capable of breaking the workflow. Anthropic has decided to attack the problem. The company led by Dario Amodei announced a rise of the limits of Claude Code and the Claude API, relying on a new alliance with SpaceXAI. The pact will give it access to Colossus 1, an infrastructure that Anthropic presents as a way to directly improve the experience of its most intensive users. The promise, for now, is clear: more room to use Claude without demand taking its toll so quickly. The tension with limits. The adjustment that helps understand this news came a few weeks earlier. Anthropic recently modified their time limits to better manage demand during peak hours. In practice, this meant that five-hour sessions could be consumed before those actual five hours had passed if the use occurred during peak periods. The change especially affected those who made more intense use of Claude. More room to use Claude. Anthropic specifies the improvement in three changes that, according to the company, take effect immediately. The first is the doubling of Claude Code’s five-hour limits for Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans per seat. The second is the removal of the peak limit reduction for Claude Code on Pro and Max accounts. The third affects the API: Anthropic says it has considerably raised the usage limits for Claude Opus models, although the exact scope depends on the limits table published by the company itself. Colossus muscle 1. The agreement with SpaceXAI is the most striking piece of the announcement because Anthropic ensures that it will be able to use all the computing capacity of the Colossus 1 data center. According to the company, that means more than 300 megawatts of new capacity and more than 220,000 NVIDIA GPUs that will be available within a month. SpaceXAI also details that the cluster includes deployments of H100, H200 and GB200 accelerators. The transformation continues. SpaceXAI does not appear in this agreement as simply a new label within the SpaceX ecosystem. The context, Elon Musk noted that “xAI will be dissolved as an independent company” and that its artificial intelligence products will be integrated under SpaceXAI. The phrase helps understand why Anthropic is talking about this brand when explaining its new access to computing power. Of course, to avoid confusion, what Anthropic announced is not a purchase or a merger, but rather an agreement to use AI infrastructure. It is not an isolated agreement. Anthropic also wanted to frame the alliance with SpaceXAI within a much broader capability strategy. The company recalls an agreement of up to 5 GW with Amazon, which includes almost 1 GW of new capacity by the end of 2026, and another 5 GW pact with Google and Broadcom that will begin to come into operation in 2027. To this it adds a strategic alliance with Microsoft and NVIDIA, with $30 billion of capacity in Azure, and an investment of $50 billion in AI infrastructure in the United States with Fluidstack. The most futuristic part. The agreement also includes a much more speculative derivative. Anthropic says that as part of the pact, it has expressed interest in collaborating with SpaceXAI to develop several gigawatts of orbital computing capacity. SpaceXAI presents it as a possible answer to the pressure that AI is putting on energy, land and cooling on the ground, but for now we are far from something tangible. Of course, this route would only make sense if important engineering challenges are overcome first. The real challenge. Anthropic has put on the table a direct answer to one of the big complaints surrounding Claude, although the most important part is still missing: checking how it feels in real use. SpaceXAI’s new limits and additional capacity seem to point in the right direction for those who work intensively with these services. The improvement, therefore, opens a new phase: that of checking if Claude can offer more margin without its users encountering the same wall again too soon. Images | Xataka with Nano Banana In Xataka | The “token economy” is broken: flat AI programming fees are mathematically unsustainable

Blue Origin equals SpaceX in rocket reuse but fails in the mission

by

Blue Origin has reused the propellant of its New Glenn rocket for the first time, reaching a milestone that until now had only been achieved by SpaceX. With this achievement, it is one step closer to its main competitor, which is also beginning to hinder its path to the Moon. However, this launch has been accompanied by some errors that still allow Elon Musk’s company to breathe easy. The good and the bad. Last November, Blue Origin managed to recover the propellant for the first time with which he had launched a New Glenn rocket into space. Their goal was to reuse it, exactly as SpaceX already does routinely. That second achievement has been a long time coming, but it finally took place this Sunday, April 19. The launch was carried out successfully, but there was a problem: The satellite it was carrying as a payload was placed in the wrong orbit. Therefore, although this is a giant step for Jeff Bezos’ space company, there are still details to be refined. Background. Blue Origin had already managed to reuse the propellant of a rocket, but it was not a New Glenn rocket, but a New Shepard. This one is smaller, so it was less of a challenge. To match SpaceX, it needed to do the same with a larger rocket. For this reason, the company’s goal has long been set on reusing the first phase of a New Glenn. This one measures 98 meters high. The New Shepard only 18 meters. A failed attempt in January 2025. To reuse a propellant, it must first be recovered. This occurs after the rocket launches. The two phases separate and, while the second continues the journey to leave its payload in place, the first returns to Earth. Ideally, a vertical landing or splashdown should occur, so that the propellant can be recovered intact. Blue Origin already tried this with a New Glenn rocket in January 2025, but a failure to fire the engines during descent prevented it from being done correctly. In November, however, complete recovery was achieved. That has been the propellant that has now been reused. SpaceX has reused its Falcon 9 hundreds of times Other companys. In reality, the only space companies that have achieved reuse of this type have been Blue Origin and SpaceX, although there is another that has done something similar: Rocket Lab. In their case, a vertical landing of the first phase does not occur, but instead It lands in the ocean with the help of a parachute. It is also useful, but recovery is more complicated. Furthermore, this company has not yet achieved complete reuse of the recovered rockets. Other companies, like the Chinese LandSpacethey also intend to follow in the footsteps of SpaceX, but are still carrying out tests. Importance for the future. Rocket reuse is important for many reasons. To begin with, what companies look at most: their economy. Not having to manufacture a new propellant with each launch greatly reduces costs and allows investment in other technologies. On the other hand, it is useful and necessary for reduce space debris levels. SpaceX does not stop generating new space junk by sending satellites into space. Few experts consider that the reuse of rockets will compensate for that, but it continues with its particular space greenwashing. SpaceX has made a lot of progress in this regard. Their reuse of rockets has already become routine, with more than 500 reused takeoffs from its Falcon 9. It has also been possible to reuse the powerful Starship. Even Rockets have been recovered in flight with a kind of giant Chinese chopsticks. Now, Blue Origin is closer, but if they want to continue in the competition they must be more accurate. An investigation is underway as to why the satellite did not end up in the correct orbit. When you find the answer, you can look for solutions. Images | Blue Origin | SpaceX In Xataka | Jeff Bezos asked his parents for their life savings to found Amazon. They only asked him one question: “What is the Internet?

The list of space launches is collapsed. Meanwhile, SpaceX has done two in a single day

by

More and more public and private space companies are launching into space. Most are commercial, often satellite-related. There are so many events of this type that launch platforms are beginning to become saturated and many companies are beginning to look for alternatives, such as launches from the sea. Despite this situation, SpaceX has just launched two Starlink satellites on the same day. 19 hours difference. Last Tuesday, April 14, Elon Musk’s space company carried out two launches of rockets loaded with Starlink satellites: one at 5:23 am EDT and another at 00:29 EDT. With the first launch, 29 Starlink satellites were put into orbit and with the second 25. Favor treatment? In 2025, the Donald Trump Government announced its intention to relax space regulationsthus streamlining licenses for releases. A year earlier, when Elon Musk showed himself as one of the main supporters of the now president during his electoral campaign, this topic was already mentioned on several occasions. The CEO of SpaceX had expressed interest in which the Federal Aviation Administration accelerated the processing of licenses for its launches. Therefore, despite the fact that Musk and Trump’s relations are not the best currently, it could be thought that he has had this possibility due to favored treatment. Although it doesn’t seem like the case. The strategy. In reality, the easing of space regulations does not fall solely on SpaceX. Many licenses can be obtained more quickly. But this requires a good strategy. To begin with, when a launch is made it is necessary to stop maritime and air traffic for a time to avoid accidents. This should be done for an optimal amount of time.without putting anyone in danger, but in a way that does not slow down transport too much. Therefore, it is not viable to make two launches in a row in the same place, even if they are licensed. To avoid this problem, Elon Musk made his two launches on Tuesday from two different points: Florida and California. Thus, problems are avoided. The more the better (at least for Musk). Repeat, repeat and repeat. That is Elon Musk’s maxim. With Starshipfor example, has carried out many test launches until its operation is optimized. There have been explosions, but also achievements. The key is to rehearse over and over again. With Starlink, SpaceX aims to send tens of thousands of satellites into space. Therefore, launches cannot be spaced out over time, especially now that they have other companies on their heels. Elon Musk needs these strategies, which for him are plausible, but which give a lot to think about about the possible lack of ethics and the inequality that exists between some space companies and others. Image | US Space Force photo, Gwendolyn Kurze In Xataka | Ukraine’s military has a problem almost as important as Russia: Starlink belongs to Elon Musk

SpaceX is now a company in the railway sector and it is very bad news for its employees

by

For some people it will be ingenuity, for others a very hard face, but the point is that SpaceX has found a way to avoid lawsuits and strikes by its workers when obtaining the name of air transport company. This means that it is regulated under the Railway Labor Law, with all the benefits that it entails within US legislation. The news. On March 13, the official resolution was made public by which SpaceX, Elon Musk’s space agency, is now considered a company in the railway sector in the United States. This means that your activity is no longer subject to the supervision of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)which is typically responsible for protecting the labor rights of private sector workers. The layoffs that started it all. In January 2024, the NLRB put a lawsuit against SpaceX on the tableafter the company illegally fired 8 employees. The lawsuit requested reinstatement of the employees, back pay, and a letter of apology to each of them. Given this situation, SpaceX responded with another lawsuit to the NLRBalleging that the procedure being carried out was unconstitutional. Rockets have the same legal treatment as cargo planes. An ace up your sleeve. According to Elon Musk’s company, the NLRB should not be able to act against a company that is dedicated to transportation. He added that One of its main missions is the transport of humans and goods to the International Space Station.. In many cases, these jobs are carried out for NASA, so they would also be providing a service to the Government. For all this, they requested to be covered under the Railway Labor Law. A plan that suits many. In recent years, SpaceX, as well as other Elon Musk companies, have been the subject of complaints from a multitude of dissatisfied employees, either due to their personal situation or due to bad practices carried out in the company. In the case of Neuralink, for example, Very bad practice towards laboratory animals was reported. But returning to SpaceX, the increasing volume of complaints could put the company’s work pace at risk. This, logically, would harm its managers, but also the companies that benefit from its services. The entire US space program would probably collapse. For all this, although it seemed difficult, in the end Elon Musk’s company has had a resolution in favor of its new name. Immune to strikes. One of the peculiarities of railroad companies in the United States is that they benefit from special state protection. Since minimum transport services must be guaranteed, strikes and other similar activities that would normally slow down the normal pace of work are closely controlled. The NLRB no longer rules. Another of those special protections for railroad companies is that the NLRB no longer has power over them. Therefore, dismissed employees cannot resort to it to report their situation. Instead, the company is governed by the rules of the National Mediation Boardmuch more lax in the mediation of labor disputes. It is true that employees can request strikes, but to do so they must undergo a long and tedious process that often causes them to change their decision. And now what? With this new name, SpaceX has even more power and freedom than before. If measures are carried out that involve malpractice towards employees, it is difficult for their complaints to come to fruition legally. This gives them a lot of leeway and greatly speeds up their protocols. Other curious legal victories. It is not the first time that SpaceX has obtained an unexpected legal name. Last year, for example, The Starbase base was given the name of cityso that all employees who live nearby would also become inhabitants. This, far from changing a few patterns, also gave SpaceX more freedom when maneuvering in the areas surrounding its base. As with railway legislation, what may seem like a small name change can change everything. Image | Gage Skidmore (Wikimedia Commons) |SpaceX In Xataka | SpaceX is preparing the largest IPO in history: the fact that it is doing so right now is no coincidence

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.