china

Japan had dominated total car sales for more than 20 years, until China knocked on the door

by

Projections for 2025 anticipate a historic change in the global automobile industry. And as they point out data According to Nikkei China, Chinese manufacturers expect to reach approximately 27 million vehicles sold globally, surpassing the almost 25 million expected from Japanese brands. It is the first time in more than two decades that Japan has lost absolute leadership in total automobile sales. Why is it important. For more than 20 years, Japanese manufacturers have dominated global vehicle sales figures. Toyota, Honda, Nissan and company have become a global reference in sales volume and efficiency over all these years. That China is going to overtake them reflects the mammoth change that is happening in the automobile industry, with the Asian giant conquering every possible corner at a speed that is difficult for the rest of the competitors to digest. In detail. According to data from Nikkei China based on information from manufacturers and figures from S&P Global Mobility until November 2025, China’s growth in this sector will be 17% year-on-year. The figures include both passenger and commercial vehicles, and include both domestic sales and exports. The Chinese domestic market represents around 70% of these total sales, where new energy vehicles (pure electric and plug-in hybrids) already account for almost 60% of passenger cars sold. Brands such as BYD and Geely have entered the global top 10 manufacturers by sales this year, while Chery has consolidated as one of the largest exporters in the country. Exports support growth. The domestic market in China is a jungle. Overcapacity and increasingly fierce price competition They are making a dent in the country, which is why Chinese manufacturers have intensified their international expansion. In Southeast Asia, traditionally dominated by Japanese brands, Chinese sales will grow by 49% to reach around 500,000 units, according to data from the report. In Europe, despite the tariffs imposed Regarding electric vehicles, it is expected that there will be sales of about 2.3 million vehicles, benefiting from the fact that many plug-in hybrids are exempt from additional taxes. Emerging markets also joinand the figures indicate that Africa will register 230,000 vehicles sold (32% more) and Latin America will reach 540,000 units (33% more). A turning point. Japan reached its peak sales in 2018 with almost 30 million units. In just three years, the eight million vehicle lead it had over China in 2022 has completely evaporated. Japanese brands have lost market share in key Asian markets and are struggling to adapt to the electric transition, where they have arrived late. Toyota maintains its strength in segments such as pickups and is committed to carbon-neutral combustion engines (via renewable fuels) and hybrid technology, but in China, the largest market in the world and capital of the electric car, that approach is costing them dearly. Not even Honda, Nissan and Mitsubishi, which now they collaborate on software and electrical infrastructure, can withstand the storm coming from China, a country that has specialized above all in batteries, software and production speed. And now what. Japan has a great challenge ahead if it wants to recover ground in electrification and stop the erosion in markets where until recently they dominated strongly. China does not have a bed of roses either, since its challenge will be to maintain the pace in a context of growing protectionism, with the United States and Canada Tariffs of more than 100% already apply to Chinese electric companies, and those of the European Union of up to 45.3%. Things are going to be interesting. Cover image | BYD and Xiaomi In Xataka | Ferdinand Porsche devised the first car with an electric motor in each wheel. Today a Chinese manufacturer is going to make it possible

Apple, Google and Samsung promised them happily with 5,000mAh batteries. Until China came to rub their hands on their faces

by

The person writing these lines has an American mobile phone—made in China—with a little more 5,000mAh. A figure in which giants like Apple, Samsung or Google have been comfortably installed for years. Meanwhile, in China, Honor has just made official a phone with a 10,000 mAh battery. The launch is not surprising just because it has managed to literally introduce a powerbank inside a smartphone. It is surprising because it breaks a barrier that until now no one had dared to cross. Not due to lack of possibilities, but due to industrial inertia. The aforementioned. Honor has made the Honor Win and Honor Win RT. Two phones that, in addition to having the best Qualcomm processorshave a 10,000mAh battery made of silicon-carbon technology. The message is clear: this is not a typical high-end, it is proof that China is the leading benchmark in batteries for smartphones. thickness. For years there has been an unwritten but unquestionable rule: more battery means more thickness. The 10,000 mAh were reserved for rugged, bulky mobile phones designed for very specific uses. These Honor Win break that logic. They are thinner than a iPhone 17 Pro Maxbut with double the energy capacity. There are no gimmicks, fine print or marketing exercises: it’s a real leap in energy density. How did they achieve it?. Honor has not specified how they have managed to take the capacity to such an extreme but the person responsible is clear: silicon-carbon. This technology has been demonstrating for years that it is possible to introduce much denser batteries in the sizes in which lithium has already reached its ceiling. Chinese mobile phones have been standardizing for more than a year batteries over 7,000mAhand Honor’s move to reach five figures marks what aspires to be a new standard. The cons. Silicon-carbon poses certain challenges, and the first is degradation. These batteries, especially in their first generations, They seemed not to be at the same level as classic lithium batteries. Over time, the promised charge cycles are virtually identical to those of traditional lithium batteries (more than 1,500). The second is the cost: producing this type of cells is more expensivewhich partially explains why, for the moment, these figures reach China first and not global markets. In fact, a common practice is to find models whose Chinese version has more battery than the global version, reserved for the rest of the markets. A third key point is related to security and regulation. Denser batteries require stricter controls, and Western regulatory frameworks are not always prepared to adopt these types of advances so quickly. None of this invalidates progress. It simply explains why Apple, Samsung or Google have not yet made the leap. It’s not that they can’t: it’s that they haven’t wanted to take the risk… yet. China is going to force a move. The 10,000mAh batteries are, without much room for doubt, one of the biggest technological leaps in the world of smartphones after the arrival of AI. A figure that will allow us to normalize the three days of average use without going through the charger. The leap is so relevant that, whether they like it or not, “traditional” manufacturers will have to start making a move, as they had to start doing with fast charging systems. Samsung has already started implementing the 7,000mAh in phones like the Galaxy M51but its high-end is still at the 5,000mAh barrier. Google also moves in the 5,200mAh and Apple… is Apple. With a greater or lesser pace of implementation, these manufacturers are forced to keep pace with China in these advances. And that translates into admitting that we were wrong about lithium. Image | Honor In Xataka | The Android phones with the best battery of 2025: which one to buy and recommended models

South Korea just turned on AX K1. “An AI for everyone” that puts the country in the race between China and the US

by

The race for artificial intelligence It is the new diamond of the economy of many countries. one to whom they are throwing money as if the world were going to end and that it is having serious implications on issues that affect citizens such as energyhe employment and with one last controversy: the exorbitant price of RAM. The great powers they want to be sovereign in this field, and South Korea has just light his first hyperscale artificial intelligence model. His name could be some son of Elon Musk: AX K1. In short. Developed by the giant SK Telecom, AX K1 is a model that has 519 billion total parameters, although during inference, which is the practical use case, it “only” activates about 33 billion. It’s still accurate (as accurate as an AI can be) but consumes far fewer resources. That 519B – A33B mode is based on the ‘architecture’mixture of experts‘ that selects in real time and dynamically the optimal parameter subsets for each task. These parameters are like the neural connections that allow the model to “learn” during training, and the fact that South Korea already has a hyperscale model is a huge leap in the country’s position within the global picture of AI. Master Model. The design of this model allows stable performance in tasks such as advanced reasoning, mathematics and multilingual comprehension, but there is also an interesting concept: it works as a “Master Model”. These models are the ones that transfer knowledge to smaller models. While the master knows everything, the lighter model is specialized in a specific task. And, although the large model consumes an enormous amount of resources, the “student” that inherits complex capabilities without having to manage so many parameters can run on devices and environments with more limited resources. For example, the AX K1 with those 512B can “transfer its knowledge” to those below the 70B scale, much more specialized and cheaper. “As Korea’s leading AI company, we will continue to push forward our efforts to deliver AI for everyone” – Tae Yoon Kim “AI for everyone”. In less words: the master model allows the expansion of AI to be accelerated because the hyperscale is used for research, but the lower scale is used for more everyday products. And, precisely, that is what SK Telecom seeks: for its IOA to be the basis on which the country operates. In collaboration with different universities, associations and thanks to the memory manufacturer SK Hynix –one of the giants of the sector and part of SK Telecom-, the company hopes it will be the foundation of an “AI for all.” This implies that they will deploy it in their services and, as it is open source, its API can be the basis of other models in university, business and even national ecosystems. In fact, there is already talk of very specific solutions, such as access to AI through text messages and even phone calls, but also multilingual search services and even a boost for AI in video games. And, of course, for humanoid robotics either for education. The great advantage that the consortium that owns AX K1 has is that it is one of the largest groups in the world, with a presence in the semiconductor, telephone, transportation, construction, energy and video game industries. Therefore, you can easily scale this technology. Third in contention. SK Telecom has confirmed that it plans to continue expanding its model with agent-based execution and those 519Bs allow Korea to become “one of the top three artificial intelligence nations in the world,” in the words of Tae Yoon Kimone of those responsible for the model. The group’s intention is to help “consolidate South Korea as one of the world’s top three artificial intelligence nations,” a race that is taking place resources difficult to contextualize in both the United States and China and which is crushing markets like RAM for consumers. Image | SK Telecom In Xataka | The exorbitant deployment of data centers for AI has a new problem: salt caverns

We still don’t know if humanoid robots will be the next great technological revolution. Yes we know that China will lead it

by

There are a lot of companies determined to sell us the idea that, in the not too distant future, everyone we will have a humanoid robot at home. We have many doubts that they will be the revolution that they promise (and there are reasons for this), but in China they have it very clear. Patents. They count in South China Morning Post that Morgan Stanley has published volume 3 of its series ‘Robot Almanac‘, which details some key data on the state of the humanoid robot industry. China is far ahead when it comes to patents, having registered 7,705 patents in the last five years, while in the United States they have registered 1,561, almost five times less than its technological rival par excellence. Dependence. It’s not just about patents, China has another key advantage and that is that its production lines are much more efficient from a cost point of view. This causes the rest of the companies that manufacture humanoids to depend on them if they do not want their production costs to skyrocket. The cost of building a supply chain in which China was left out would raise prices exponentially. The report estimates that manufacturing the Tesla Optimus Gen 2 without China’s participation would raise the cost from about $46,000 to $131,000. Obsession with robots. Humanoid robots from companies like Unitree or Deep Robotics have been in the public eye for a long time. We have seen them participate in the first robotic olympics, fight, play soccer and how dance corps in macro concerts. They are appearances clearly focused on going viral, showing their capabilities to the world and, ultimately, making people see them as something cool and want to buy one. However, although humanoids take all the spotlight, they are only the tip of the iceberg of a strategy that goes much further. Personified AI. In English it would be ’embodied AI’ and it is the approach that China has taken in his particular AI career. The government included the term in his job report this year, which highlights its strategic importance. More than large language and software models, China wants AI that is present, whether in the form of humanoid robots, drones, autonomous vehicles or industrial robots. Speaking of industry, guess who has 51% of all industrial robots in the world. Exactly: China. Industrial robots. According to data from Financial TimesChina installs 280,000 robots a year in its factories with a clear objective: automate to achieve greater efficiency and power continue being the factory of the world. Now that workers’ salaries are higherthe way they have found to remain competitive against markets like India or Bangladesh is automation. Image | Andy Kelly in Unsplash In Xataka | I have asked for water from the first humanoid robot working in Beijing. It’s a weird vending machine.

China decided to privatize its daycare centers in the 1980s. Unknowingly, it was creating its enormous birth crisis.

by

Not long ago, China had an excess birth problem. For more than three decades, the one child policy stopped the rapid growth of the population, but now its problem is just the opposite. The demographic crisis has turned around and Chinese population is plummeting. The government has launched plans to encourage births and its latest idea is to improve critical infrastructure. Target: daycare centers. They tell it in South China Morning PostChina is reviewing what will be the first law regulating the child care services sector. The measures will focus on children under three years of age, with the aim of building a society “fertility-friendly”. Among its key measures are improving the quality of the service, ensuring that professionals have the necessary qualifications for the position and expanding the offer of more affordable childcare, which will reduce the cost of parenting. Who takes care of the children. China is encouraging couples to have children through different measures and daycare centers were one of the key aspects to improve. Since the 80s, The state stopped offering public daycares, shifting the burden of care to families. Society adapted in the most predictable way: that the grandparents were the ones to take care of the children (something that it doesn’t always turn out well) or that the woman reduced her hours to take care of the care. A question of money. The lack of regulation has caused the supply of affordable daycare centers to be scarce and with insufficiently qualified professionals. Quality daycare was a luxury available to a few, while for less well-off families it is a last resort. The new law seeks to promote the creation of new state centers at more affordable prices. and trust. The scandals over cases of abuse in Chinese daycares are well known inside and outside their borders, and have also been given cases of abuse by babysitters. If, in addition to the fact that it is an expensive service, we add the problem of lack of trust, it is not surprising that care in the early years ends up being a deterrent factor for many families. In 2021, only 5.5% of Chinese children under three years old were in daycarea figure that contrasts with the 88% of schooling from 3 to 6 years old. Other measures. Since the end of the one-child policy in 2015, the government has implemented several plans to correct the declining birth rate curve. Along with births, marriages also declined, so it was proposed teach marriage and love classes and even be a kind of matchmaker for help young people find a partner. His last measure is one of the most striking: put a special tax on condoms. Image | note thanun in Unsplash In Xataka | If the question is how to reactivate birth rates, China believes it has the answer: finance painless births

wants to connect all traffic as they already do in China

by

The connected V16 beacon becomes mandatory on January 1, but the DGT already suggests that this device would only be the first piece of a much more ambitious project. The director of the organization, Pere Navarro, advanced in an interview in Public Mirror that will soon arrive “the connected cones” and other smart signage elements. And that makes perfect sense, since in the end the objective is nothing more than minimizing the risk of accidents through an interconnected traffic network. Something similar to what is already happening in other countries such as China, Singapore, Japan or South Korea, among others. A fully connected traffic network. If we insist on the example of China, applications like Amap, its equivalent to Google Maps, allow drivers to know how many seconds are left before a traffic light turns green. There they have all their road infrastructure connected. Traffic lights, traffic cameras and the vehicles themselves are part of a digital ecosystem that intends to improve traffic and reduce accidents. Europe, and specifically Spain with the DGT at the helm, seems to look towards this model as a long-term reference. The DGT 3.0 platform as the brain of the system. Behind the connected V16 beacon is DGT 3.0the digital platform that acts as the nerve center of this entire smart network. When a driver activates his beacon after a breakdown or accident, the device sends its position through IoT networks in approximately 100 seconds. This information reaches DGT 3.0 and, from there, is automatically distributed to roadside information panels, navigation applications and other connected vehicles. Pere Navarro insist in that the system does not collect personal data: “When you buy the beacon, you are not asked for any information. We don’t even know the vehicle’s license plate.” “The DGT does not want to know where you are at all times, the beacons have not been created for that,” as stated on Antena 3. Smart cones, next step. Navarro confirmed that connected cones will arrive after V16, designed to inform about workers on the road, sports events, demonstrations or special transportation. These cones will work with the same logic: when activated, they will send their location to DGT 3.0 so that the rest of the drivers receive warnings before reaching the conflict point. The objective is to gain reaction time and avoid risky situations. The idea is that these cones can also help better manage traffic during events that require road closures, allowing vehicles to be diverted along alternative routes more efficiently. The V-27 signal, warning inside the car. Another element that is part of this connected network is the V-27 signala triangle with an exclamation mark and three stripes symbolizing connectivity. This signal appears directly on the instrument panel of compatible vehicles when DGT 3.0 detects a nearby incident, either due to the activation of a V16 beacon or for any other reason that the agency considers dangerous. Of course, it only works on connected cars whose manufacturers or service providers are registered with the National Access Point for Traffic and Mobility Information. On secondary roads, where there are no illuminated panels, this system can make a difference by providing early warning of dangers that would otherwise go unnoticed. Towards the autonomous car. If the DGT knows at all times where the broken down vehicles, construction cones, smart traffic lights and surveillance cameras are, it will be much easier to have an effective accident prevention system. For the DGT, connectivity is a solution to eliminate unnecessary risks, such as get out of the car to signal an emergency. Whether the systems are truly effective remains to be seen. But in addition to that, all this information can lay the foundations for the arrival of the autonomous car. And these cars need precisely that: detailed, real-time information about everything that happens on the road. Flexibility. Pere Navarro made it clear that there will be no massive sanctions campaigns during 2026 with the whole V-16 beacon thing. “The objective is not to fine, the objective is an improvement in road safety,” he stated in the interview. The director of the organization assured that the agents will apply flexible criteria while drivers adapt to the new system, prioritizing information over immediate sanctions. Cover image | DGT In Xataka | Someone has created abstract works of art with one of the most unique forms of engineering: highway “knots”

China has been dumping tons of sand into the ocean for 12 years. And now we are seeing islands emerging in the middle of nowhere

by

It has been more than a decade since China began a striking strategy of territorial expansion: throwing tons of sand into the South China Sea. This is not unique to China and, in fact, Japan thus built an airport that soon it will be an underwater airportbut China is doing it massively and with one objective: to claim what is its own. And seeing how they raise these artificial islands is… hypnotic. Context. The end of 2013 marked a turning point in China: the country started to massively fill in seven of the reefs of the Nansha and Xisha archipelagos (Spratly and Paracels, respectively). In record time between December of that year and June 2015, China carried out the first phase of the operation: the filling phase. From 2015 onwards, they have dedicated themselves to consolidate that territory through the construction of infrastructure such as landing strips, hangars, ports, radars and support structures. According to the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, between December 2015 and October 2015, China had built artificially about 12 km² of land on the Nansha reefs. While the United States said it with concern, the Chinese media confirmed the information with pride. Before and then How they do it. They did not use overly complex methods to do so. On the one hand, they cut the coral bottom and pumped sediments to shallow areas. The earth was deposited as fill to later build dikes and retaining walls around the reef. The next step was to deposit more fill and, finally, large steamrollers and shovels were compacting that earth to give consistency to the whole. The last thing was to create paving, landing strips, roads and other infrastructure. The result is more than 12 km², and put in context they represent “17 times more land claimed in 20 months than all the other international claimants have achieved during the last 40 years.” In action. Seeing the satellite photos that show the before and after, something easy to do using the history function of Google Earth, is interesting, but seeing a timelapse of how one of these new territories has been built is, as I said, something hypnotic. An example, the following video ‘tweet‘ (if you can’t see it, click on it): Narrative. What motivation does China have for such a deployment of resources and money? It depends who you ask. On the one hand, the Chinese government has defended that the creation of these islands serves the support in rescue missions on the high seasalso to fishing, scientific research, navigation support points thanks to these radars and the collection of data for its meteorological service. Finally, it also serves for defense if necessary. The neighbors are not convinced by the explanation and, in fact, think that it is a strategy that responds to a single interest: claiming territories that China considers its property. The Ministry of Defense of Japan assures that these infrastructures allow a permanent Chinese presence in waters that do not belong to it, with offensive capacity in practically the entire South China Sea. Military. Recent reports, such as the one from CSIS in 2025, underlines that China’s recent near-perennial activity in the South China Sea has only been possible thanks to that decade-old construction work. Western analyzes they point that the runways for aircraft are prepared for combat aircraft and land transport, as well as the presence of ports for warships, underground facilities and even missile platforms. The tension is evident because Beijing claims sovereignty over territories that its neighbors deny. Those neighbors are Vietnam, Taiwan, Japan or the Philippines. And Vietnam, in fact, is doing the same thing as China in 2013: throwing land into the sea. Their progress has also been considerable in a short time in an area that has become a real hotbed. The ecological impact. But beyond the intentions of each other, something undeniable that cannot be hidden under any narrative is the environmental damage that these artificial islands cause to their surroundings. In some articles it has been indicated that this ‘island’ desire has caused the loss of some 12 to 18 km² of reef, damaging some of the best preserved reefs in the region directly, but also affecting distant systems due to the ‘clouds’ of sediment formed during the dumping of sediments. Chinese scientific articles have also shown that these practices eliminate completely the ecosystem of the occupied area and negatively affects currents and sediment patterns, causing the aforementioned degradation of neighboring areas. However, the State Oceanic Administration of China defend that all projects were thoroughly evaluated and do not harm corals. The fault of it? Global trends such as sea acidification or climate change. Images | Ma Wukong In Xataka | China is building something that looks like an oil well. It is actually a nuclear bunker with a command center

It is the back door through which China avoids US tariffs

by

The Bac Luan 2 Bridge is the border that connects China to Vietnam. According to one Nikkei Asia researchit is also the back door through which China is sneaking its goods to continue selling in the US without being affected by tariffs. what’s happening. Chinese trucks form huge queues at the border town of Mong Cai every morning; They bring merchandise that will end up arriving in the United States, but first all traces of ‘Made in China’ are erased and the certificates of origin are changed so that it continues its journey as Vietnamese merchandise. The trick allows them to continue selling products while avoiding the high tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, always according to Nikkei. Why is it important. It highlights that the trade war is full of cracks. We have seen other similar “tricks” such as dropshipping of chips and also Chinese companies that have gained access to banned NVIDIA chips via Indonesia. What on paper seem like insurmountable walls are not so insurmountable in practice; Chinese companies respond by redesigning new supply chains to keep prices low and continue selling in the US. Re-export. It is the strategy that many Chinese companies are adopting, some even offer it as a service to their clients. Nikkei has had access to a document from a Chinese company in which they literally say “re-exporting through a third country is effective in avoiding high tariffs.” Another company urges its customers not to include Chinese characters on the packaging nor of course any reference to ‘Made in China’. Volume. Of course the process of changing the country of origin is done clandestinely and China evidently does not recognize this practice, but the volume of containers that have passed through the border in Mong Cai continues to increase. As of July 2025, this volume was 840,000 tons, 43% more than the same period last year. At the same time, exports between Vietnam and the US are also increasing. In addition, Nikkei has analyzed satellite images and found that the Mong Cai border has changed a lot recently; It is filling up with logistics centers and urbanizations with a strong presence of Chinese businesses. White and in bottle. Washington raises his eyebrow. Trump reached an agreement with Vietnam, but warned that would raise tariffs to 40% if it is proven that they are acting as a platform to divert exports. Vietnam is trying to calm the waters by pursuing these fraudulent export practices and in July of this year alone they uncovered 900 cases. The question is how many more are still sneaking in and not just in Vietnam, routes are also being diverted through Malaysia, Indonesia and others. Image | Daniel Fikri in Unsplash In Xataka | China already has an army of 5.8 million engineers. His new plan involves accelerating doctorates

Satellite images have revealed that China has gathered its most important aircraft carriers. And that can only mean one thing

by

The simultaneous appearance of the two ends of the Chinese aircraft carrier fleet, the Liaoning veteran and the newly incorporated Fujiandocked at the same naval base does not seem to be a logistical coincidence, but rather a carefully eloquent image. One that can only mean one thing: it is training naval “one plus one.” Two aircraft carriers, one message. Satellite images show both ships moored in Qingdaoa port historically linked to the development of Chinese naval aviation and now expanding to accommodate a new phase of maritime ambition. Together, they represent the past learned and the future being rehearsed: the transition from a regional navy to a force of waters blues capable of operating in a sustained manner far from their shores. From symbol to real capacity. China already has the largest navy in the world by number of hulls, but the qualitative leap is marked by embarked aviation. Entry into service from Fujianthe first Chinese aircraft carrier designed from scratch with electromagnetic catapults introduces a capability that until now was only dominated by the United States. In front of him, Liaoning brings more than a decade of operational experience. The coexistence of both on the same dock points to something more than maintenance: it suggests doctrinal integrationknowledge transfer and the practical initiation of group operations with multiple aircraft carriers, a threshold that separates regional navies from truly global ones. Qingdao as a laboratory. Side by side mooring It’s unusual and deliberate.. It coincides with the declaration of restricted maritime zones in the Bohai Strait and the northern Yellow Sea, a classic indication of imminent exercises. Everything points to joint training in which aircraft departure rates, deck security, logistics, command and control, and coordination between air wings will be compared. The objective is not only for Fujian to learn from Liaoning, but to see how two platforms with different capabilities can operate. as a single systemmultiplying its effectiveness. In naval terms, it is not about adding ships, but about creating operational synergies. Beyond the Strait. The Fujian’s movement northward, crossing the Taiwan Strait without aircraft on deck, has been closely followed through Tokyo and Taipei. Precisely this detail reinforces the reading that it is not a combat mission, but rather a training one. The background, however, seems unequivocal: Beijing wants to break the logic of the First Island Chain (the arc that goes from Japan to the Philippines via Taiwan) and demonstrate that it can project power beyond it. Operating two aircraft carriers in a coordinated manner is key to sustain presenceprotect distant sea lines and provide credible deterrence against US aircraft carrier groups. Implicit response to Washington. The Pentagon assumes that the People’s Liberation Army Navy is in the early stages of operating a multinaval force with aircraft carrierprogressively expanding its radius of action. The continued presence of US aircraft carriers in the Indo-Pacific, under the logic of containment and defense of allies, acts as a catalyst for this process. If you will, China somehow seems to say that it does not need to announce a doctrine for the message to get through: the image of two aircraft carriers together in Qingdao communicates that accelerated learning has begun and that the operational gap is closing. The power of tomorrow. There is no doubt, the analysts match in that these movements do not indicate an imminent conflict. But they do reveal patient and methodical preparation. Crew integration, procedure comparison and dual command testing are essential steps for a navy that aspires to operate autonomously in the Western Pacific and beyond. Japan watches it with special attention because you have already seen Chinese aircraft carriers cross its defensive perimeter in recent exercises. Each deployment, each joint training, normalizes what a decade ago would have seemed exceptional. The threshold that China wants to cross. In short, the true meaning of Qingdao is not in the number of tons or the technological novelty of Fujian, but in the sign of maturity. Going from an experimental aircraft carrier to a couple training together is crossing a strategic threshold. It is not the prelude to war, but to status. China rehearses today the choreography that will need tomorrow to hold your global maritime ambition. And in that essay, the message to allies and rivals is clear: the era of the lone Chinese aircraft carrier is behind us, and that of the carrier group has just begun. Image | Copernicus In Xataka | The Fujian is officially China’s largest power catapult: Beijing already has a button to challenge the US Navy In Xataka | China’s first aircraft carrier hunted from space by a US satellite

Dreame seeks to become the third largest in China along with Xiaomi and Huawei. Far away from wanting to be the new Dyson

by

Dreame is a Chinese manufacturer that has crept into the European conversation based on muscle. Muscle for the home, specifically. Founded in 2015, it soon emerged as a serious rival of Dyson thanks to its numerous vacuum cleaners of all kinds and beauty devices. Now it has been filtered the Dreame E1, the company’s first mobile with which they seek to replicate the strategy of the “Apple from China”. They no longer want to be Dyson, they want to be Xiaomi. The Dreame E1. In September, Dreame dropped the bomb: robot vacuum cleaners They were going to move into the smartphone segment and electric cars. Since then, Dreame’s phone had kept a low profile, but it recently appeared in the European database EPREL with the name ‘W5110’. We have to wait for the official announcement, but it seems that it will have a AMOLED screen 6.67 inches, a 108 megapixel main camera, a 4,850 mAh battery and only 33 W charging, as well as seven years of system updates. This would aim to satisfy European regulators. Divide the world. Its features are not revolutionary and the sketches look like those of a Samsung Galaxy S25but it is a first step. No price or key details such as the processor or something so on everyone’s lips like the RAM memorybut in an internal communication, the CEO of Dreame pointed out high: they want to be one of the three tigers of consumer technology. The other two would be Huawei and Xiaomi, companies that have been shaping an ecosystem in which a multitude of home devices are controlled by a single brain: the mobile phone. In a scenario in which we can have our house full of Dreameit is a vision with all the sense in the world. 1+8+N from Huawei. Many devices, a single brain Xiaomi, the birthplace of Dreame. To understand this strategy, it is essential to understand the model that Xiaomi has been developing for more than a decade. The company began by selling its own products, but also making investment strategies in promising startups, like Dreame. These companies developed a product and gained access to Xiaomi’s distribution network, but also to its name. A rice cooker from an unknown company does not attract attention. One from that same company, but under the name Xiaomicalls much more. This way, the risks are also lower. And, precisely, Dreame manufactured vacuum cleaners that they formed part of the Xiaomi ecosystem while simultaneously operating its own catalog. It is something that explains the rapid growth of many Chinese brands, something impossible, or very difficult, if they had operated independently from the beginning. Roborock too was in that Xiaomi ecosystem. Meteoric. The rise they have achieved since their independent birth has been brutal. According to some analyses, Dreame is the third manufacturer of robot vacuum cleaners with a share of 11.3%. They only have Ecovacs ahead with 13.6% and Roborock with 19.3%. In Europe they are very well positioned, reporting great growth in revenue during the first half of this year, and the consequence is what we saw during the presentation at the IFA a few months ago. The mobile phone will be the control center, that N+1 that we have seen in companies like the aforementioned Xiaomi or Huawei, and at the German fair they announced that, along with the consolidation of their personal care range, robot vacuum cleaners, vacuum cleaners, lawnmower robots and pool cleaner, will launch in Spain in the coming months televisions, air conditioners, dishwashers and kitchen appliances. They are already at itwith small appliances, accessories and even smart lighting. In this photo the ecosystem is that of Xiaomi. It could easily be Dreame’s future. Image | Xataka Ford already said it. It is, as we said, a carbon copy of the strategy that has worked so well for Xiaomi. They entered with competitive technology at a good price to gain market share and customer loyalty, and now they want to expand the ecosystem with all types of connected devices. It is a strategy within the reach of not all companies, but it is drawing the attention even of people like Jim Farley. Farley is the CEO of Ford and, in his quest to understand why chinese cars are winning toast to Westerners, he has been driving the Xiaomi SU7. Apart from other characteristics, what impresses him most is the ecosystem: With your cell phone you control the car, and from the car you control the house. Ambition. Given this, the fact that a robot vacuum cleaner manufacturer launches a mobile phone is not a surprise and responds to a strategy in which manufacturers want us to have a house full of their devices, controlling everything from a single app. And, if possible, from your mobile. And it is not surprising if we look at the investment figures in research and development. Dreame has 5,000 employees and 60% of its staff is dedicated to R&D. They invest 7% of their annual income in this segment and it is evident that Dreame wants to stop being the Chinese Dyson. It wants to be the new Xiaomi. Images | HuaweiXataka, Dreame In Xataka | A Chinese company you don’t know makes 35% of all microwaves in the world. Probably yours too

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.