promised

Zara promised you happy with its pants for the summer. Until they ended the “killer pants” label

by

Zara’s summer catalog it’s news. And for a reason that probably won’t be liked too much at the Inditex headquarters. Over the last few days, several TikTok users have published videos in which they report that by wearing one of their pants they have allegedly suffered falls and trips. There is no official confirmation or response from the company, but there are two undeniable facts. The first is that on networks you can find a good handful of videos on the subject that show falls and even injuries. The second is that the matter has escalated to reach media such as NY Post, cnn either Le Parisian. unexpected protagonist @cnn Some women are posting online about a pair of Zara trousers that they claim have caused them injury. People say the wide-leg trousers are so wide that they trip over them. CNN reached out to Zara, and they did not respond. ♬ original sound – CNN – CNN When a fashion brand launches a press, it expects it to leave its mark on the market, but due to its sales and success among customers, it does not. for its riskswhich is what has happened to some flowy pants Zara women’s clothing. The piece in question costs 22.95 euros and stands out for its design palazzo. Tight at the waist and with a loose leg, they are light, fresh and, above all, versatile. Depending on how they are combined, they serve both a casual and formal style. The problem is that, in this specific case, the designers seem to have opted more for aesthetics than functionality. According to shared videos by several users and media on TikTok, the pants are so baggy and long that when the person wearing them walks with them can trip. That is what several recordings published on the platform show and that can be found with the labels #zaratrousers, #zarattrousersdangerous either #deadlyzarapantsin which the garment is identified as part of the Zara catalog. In its official website At least one very similar garment can be seen. @camilariberaroca think a THOUSAND times before buying them @ZARA should have a warning on the label of these pants💀⚠️ #deadly #zarapants #falling #zaratrousers #fyp ♬ original sound – jojo.aitools Many of the recordings come from private accounts showing trips, often captured by security cameras. Some users even shows wounds supposedly caused by falls. Over the last few days, however, complaints they have been escalating until reaching international media, such as the chain cnn, Le Parisian, Telegraaf, NDTV, Metro, First Post either New York Post. They have also addressed the issue influencers with thousands of followers, like Shivani Khoslawho tried the pants in person two days ago. His piece already has around 14,000 likes. The Australian media Nine assures that in total they have been published more than 2,000 videos on TikTok about a phenomenon that some (including that same headline) have dubbed “deadly pants” either “murderers”. The truth is that the topic has generated a wide conversation on networks in which irony is not lacking. @gracewils0nx Thnx Tom for laughing after you’ve picked me up off the floor xxxx @tomorford2301 @ZARA #deathtrousers #zara #zaradeathtrousers ♬ original sound – € “There should be a Netflix documentary about them”, joke a user. Others slip that the garment should be sold “with helmet and knee pads” or, in a deeper tonereport the injuries that a bad trip can cause. From what the recordings show, the problem would be the design of the legsso long and loose that when you run the risk of tripping over them. At the moment neither Zara nor Inditex have commented on the matter. At Xataka we have written to both (both Zara and its parent company) without having yet received a response at the time of publishing this article. If this arrives, we will update the information. Images | TikTok In Xataka | It’s 2025 and millions of men around the world still refuse one thing: shorts.

The Xbox CEO promised a big Xbox reset. That translates into 3,200 layoffs and five studios looking for a new home

by

Asha Sharma, the new CEO of Xbox, arrived with the ax ready and prepared to cut off heads and, after days of rumors about layoffs and closure of studieswe already have the conclusion. It was expected that this July 6 we would have news about the restructuring of Xbox, the so-called ‘reset’ of the divisionand the figure that draws attention is the 3,200 people who will lose their jobs. That is not, by any means, the end of the story because since Bloomberg It is pointing to two very hard months for employees, although also a positive note with regard to some of the most reputable studios that it had purchased in recent years. Asha Sharma and the great Xbox reset Jason Schreier is one of the most reliable journalists in the video game industry and, as he points out in Bloomberg, in an internal email from Asha Sharma to the members of the company, the CEO ensures that the business “it is not profitable”. Sharma comments that Xbox needs to be “restarted” because they are operating with margins three to ten times lower than comparable businesses. It is not the first time that Sharma alludes to the disastrous situation of Xbox because the company’s profit margin had fallen to 3% (not that they were losing 3%, but it had fallen, but they were still making money), and after all the motivational messages, the new Xbox commandments and changing the name of the division to XBOX with capital letters, the conclusion to reverse the situation is that drastic decisions had to be made. According to Schreier, and as has been filtered, Starting today, 1,600 jobs will be eliminatedwhile it will execute another 1,600 over the coming months. In total, 3,200 layoffs at Xbox alone while Microsoft is also cutting 3,200 positions in other sections away from Xbox. 6,400 people sounds outrageous, but it is just 3% of a workforce of 228,000 people. They are not definitive figures, since Microsoft ensures that They are still in the early stages of the journey. and that there will be more changes ahead in an exercise in austerity to bet on the only thing that seems to excite companies: artificial intelligence. But beyond eliminating so many jobs, the big question of what will happen to the studies was on the table. The state of Xbox studios In recent days there has been talk of several studios that could be closed, sold or “released” and at Xataka we have stayed away from those rumors, but now Schreier sheds a little light on the matter. It may seem like a consolation for fools, but Xbox seems like it won’t dismantle them. Ninja Theory (creators of ‘Hellblade’ and Undead Labs (‘State of Decay’) will be sold to unspecified buyers. The two studios will continue working for the moment on announced games (Senua’ and ‘State of Decay 3’). Double Fine (Psychonauts’) and Compulsion Games (‘South of Midnight’) will separate and become private studios again. Sharma assures that the two will retain their intellectual properties (thank goodness), but things look uncertain for Arkane Lyon. The studio is developing a ‘Blade’ game, but Microsoft is “reviewing possible strategic options to sell or spin off the studio). Why is things not clear with Arkane? Because French laws protect more than American ones and Microsoft is exploring the avenues it has. These five studies were never bestsellers, but They were purchased under the management of Phil Spencer to ‘fatten up’ the catalog of a recently presented Game Pass and Sharma now notes that “they created significant value, but they did not grow at the rate we expected.” The new CEO’s strategy, in fact, seems different from Phil’s. While under his command many (too many) studies were purchasedSharma points to smaller models of supporting independent creators, alluding to the fact that “it is neither possible nor desirable to own all the large independent studios.” The future of Xbox To finish, Sharma wants Xbox to reach one billion players daily to see a future in which Xbox is bigger, not smaller.” He assures that “this year we will invest as much in Xbox as ever, but with better focus, greater discipline and clarity, all in the service of making Xbox a place where everyone has a place.” At the moment, those who have no room are the 3,200 laid off now, which are added to the thousands laid off by Xbox in the last two years. And we will have to wait to see what happens inside ZeniMax, also owned by Xbox and where the developers of big franchises like ‘Wolfenstein’, ‘Fallout’ or ‘The Elder Scrolls’ are located. We will also have to wait and see what happens to studios that become independent because it is not exactly good news. Without the Microsoft umbrella, it may be difficult for those studios to keep all employees, so be cautious with the futures of Double Fine and Compulsion. In short, another sad day for the video game industry. In Xataka | Sony has told you why it stops selling games in physical format. The real reason, of course, is the same as always: money

Spain promised them happiness with its airports increasingly full of tourists. Until someone calculated how it affects rents

by

Of the 96.8 million of foreign tourists that Spain received last year, 80.5 million, something more than 83%they arrived through airports. The plane is not only the main entry route for foreign visitors (well above, for example, the road or ports), it also shows a clear growth trend and has led several terminals to arise its expansion to gain capacity and (simply) do not collapse due to the tourist boom. Against this backdrop, someone has asked themselves a question:What impact does it have? that avalanche of ‘air’ visitors in the Spanish real estate market? Tourists and real estate agencies? That tourism influences the residential market, encouraging the flight from housing to vacation rentals and raising prices is not no news. There are studies that have already thoroughly calibrated the phenomenon. What is curious is what the New Economics Foundation (NEF) has done in a report commissioned by Transport & Environment (T&E), an organization to which it belongs Ecologists in Action: Its technicians have examined how the increase in ‘air tourism’ is influencing housing rentals and, above all, whether we can expect a price increase in the short term. And what have they found out? That there is a direct connection. One, by the way, not at all favorable for the tenants. After analyzing “the effects of air tourism” on the real estate markets of the 12 main economies in Europe and calculating the evolution of prices in the medium term, for the period 2019-2031, NEF technicians have reached a worrying conclusion: the increase in visitors arriving in Europe through airports will affect the pockets of tenants. “We show a transfer of wealth whereby landlords benefit at the expense of tenants, as annual rents in some of Europe’s largest tourist economies are projected to rise by more than €150 a year over the next five years,” points out NEFand warns: “These increases, which represent national average increases, will be concentrated in the main tourist destinations and will mainly affect low-income households.” Can it go further? Yes. That is the general photo. The report commissioned by T&E provides other data that is just as or even more curious. For example, if we focus on the largest European economies dependent on tourism, the impact between now and 2031 will be greater: in Greece the annual increase in rental prices will amount to €163, in Portugal to €193, in Spain to €217 and in Ireland (the worst stop) to €251. In the specific case of Spain, NEF estimates that we will face an “extra increase of 1.6%” annually over the next five years, between 2026 and 2031. If we talk about rents, the average increase is 217 euros. In the case of the average price of housing, the study speaks of 3,500 euros. “Taken together, this would mean an aggregate annual increase in the rental burden of 648 million euros for landlords located in Spain. In the same period, the increase in tourist arrivals by air is projected at 11.8%,” explains. There is another key: these figures show national averages, so the phenomenon may worsen in the most touristy regions. More climbs on the islands? The T&E figures give food for thought. After recalling that there are certain parts of Europe where “local reactions” against tourism are taking place, such as the Balearic Islands, the Canary Islands, Crete and Madeira, T&E points out that these areas are also the most exposed to the arrival of air travelers. There, in the tourist centers, the report warns“tourism can reduce the supply of residential housing by shifting it towards tourist rentals, directing new promotions to visitors or non-resident buyers and making it difficult for local households to move or access a first home.” “We cannot separate the protests against tourism that occur in the streets from the increase in flights above our heads. Trying to manage tourist overcrowding while expanding the airports of Dublin, Barcelona or Lisbon is a losing battle,” claims Bosco Serrano, from T&E Spain. For reference, in the Balearic Islands there are 9.2 arrivals of foreign tourists per resident, the eighth highest value of the European regions. In the Canary Islands they are 4.9 and in Catalonia 2.0. The average for the EU as a whole is just 0.9. What are the causes? For T&E the key is in the “uncontrolled growth of tourism”, driven by the increase in supply, investment in new infrastructure and (in general) the rebound in airport traffic. It’s no surprise. In 2025 Aena registered a record data of passengers. It is important to take into account in any case that the flow of visitors that move the airports may “exacerbate” the crisis of rent (something to be expected if we take into account that many tourists from northern Europe with greater purchasing power fly to Spain), but the reality is that there are other factors that influence the evolution of housing prices. And not all of them depend on tourism. What else comes into play? The imbalance between supply and demand, the fact that new housing is built at much less speed from which new homes are created, the increase in price of materials, the concentration of demand in certain points or the attractiveness that apartments have gained as an investment asset also explain the increase in rents. None of these factors depend on tourism. In fact, there are those who already appreciate signs of a “prick” in vacation rentals, with a loss of interest on the part of investors. Does it only affect housing? No. The report analyzes the impact of tourism in other areas, such as labor or business investment. Regarding the first point, T&E warns that the arrival of more visitors on board airplanes does not always lead to better salaries for workers in the sector. “Tourism employment does not necessarily equate to an improvement in well-being. In 2023, hospitality represented 10% of all hours worked in Spain, but only 5% of the national gross added value,” warns the organization. That tourist rentals rise can … Read more

Microsoft promised a quantum computer by 2029. Nature publishes a review that questions its promise

by

Microsoft has been trying to demonstrate for almost two decades the existence of Majorana modes: quasiparticles that emerge in certain topological superconducting materials and that behave as if they were Majorana fermions. The Italian physicist Ettore Majorana mathematically described the existence of these fermions in 1937, and since then many researchers have become obsessed with them because they have a characteristic that makes them unique: They are both a particle and their own antiparticle. However, the Majorana modes that Microsoft works with are not fundamental particles; They are emerging phenomena in the field of condensed matter. Its appeal lies in the fact that if it manages to master them, it could manufacture qubits that are intrinsically more stable than those of its rivals and capable of resisting the external noise that weighs everyone down today. quantum computers. About that bet Majorana 2 arrived earlier this June, a new topological quantum processor that incorporates new materials to create a more stable topological phase. Its scientific basis comes from an article published in February 2025 in Naturecentral to all subsequent developments of this company. Regarding that work, Chetan Nayak, the technical director of quantum hardware, announced that Microsoft had cut its schedule in half: the goal of having a fully functional quantum computer is now set for 2029. Shadow looms over Microsoft’s quantum research The scientific community is being extraordinarily demanding with that article and with the research program surrounding it. In fact, this ability to exercise criticism and analysis is one of the strengths of the scientific method. Last Wednesday, Nature posted a review peer-reviewed and signed by Henry Legg, professor of quantum physics at the University of St. Andrews (Scotland), which raises new doubts about the foundations of that work. Not about a peripheral detail. On its foundations. And the background of those from Redmond does not help. Two scientific articles supported by Microsoft have already been removed from Nature. On those occasions, the editors also pointed out several alerts about possible problems in two other texts: one from Nature and the other from Science. Microsoft explained that the recalled items were produced outside of its laboratories and that did not review the data before publication. Be that as it may, the February 2025 work questioned by Legg is the fifth under scrutiny and, unlike the previous ones, it is not being withdrawn. “It’s almost like debating whether flight is possible or not, and then you find yourself next to a plane. Well, come on, get on and take a spin” Microsoft’s response has been overwhelming. According to Reutersthis company assures that it supports its research and that its program is making practical advances despite the doubts it is raising. Nayak has illustrated it with a metaphor: “It’s almost like debating whether flight is possible or not, and then you find yourself next to an airplane. Well, come on, get on and take a spin.” The response has been equally resounding. Sergey Frolov, a physicist at the University of Pittsburgh, points to a fundamental problem: Microsoft lacks the accumulated evidence that supports IBM or Quantinuum, rivals that do not depend on the existence of Majorana modes. “Neither Microsoft nor anyone else has laid the groundwork to make it clear that these advances based on Majorana modes are plausible through a series of reliable experiments,” Frolov declared. “On the contrary, we have several articles that continue to be questioned at the most basic level by different people.” The geopolitical context adds additional pressure. The Trump Administration has invested $2 billion in quantum computing and this week has set the goal to have a functional system by 2028, a year ahead of Microsoft’s deadline. The race is real. The question is whether the science that supports it is also. Image | Microsoft More information | Reuters In Xataka | 38% of AI experts in the US have been trained in China. They are essential to sustain your leadership

The United States promised to be very happy manufacturing its own chips. Nvidia just spent 150 billion in Taiwan

by

Houston, we have a problem. A couple of days ago the CEO of Nvidia stood on the stage at Computex in Taipei and said an inconvenient truth for the United States: “Taiwan is the epicenter of the AI ​​revolution. This is where chips and packaging are made. This is where systems are created. This is where AI supercomputers were created.” The setting was Computex 2026, Asia’s biggest tech event, and it wasn’t a compliment to the host, it’s a real depiction of how the industry works. It may sound paradoxical for an American company and at a time when The United States wants to reindustrialize with chipsbut he needs it. It is a structural issue. The harsh reality of profitability. Nvidia plans spend 150,000 million dollars a year in Taiwan, much more than the 100,000 million they spend now and with an abysmal difference compared to the 10,000 and 15,000 million five years ago. If it sounds silly, it’s because it is, but so is its billing: in the first fiscal quarter of 2026 billed 81.6 billion dollars, 85% more than the previous year in that same period. Also its benefit it’s already going off the charts: 58.3 billion, more than triple compared to the same period last year. That this money goes to Taiwan and not to the United States is due to technical and objective issues: Taiwan produces 90% of the most advanced chips in the world, according to a study by the Stimson Center. Of that Taiwanese production, TSMC controls 70% and is going to invest between 52,000 and 56,000 million this year. Bottom line: If Nvidia wants cutting-edge manufacturing capability, it has to be there. Why is it important. The best way to see it is to put Vera Rubin on the table, who In Huang’s words it is “probably the biggest product launch in Taiwan’s history.” Each system contains about two million parts and is assembled with 150 suppliers, almost all Taiwanese. This mechanism is not assembled by decree or in a legislature: it requires years and putting billions of dollars on the table. There is no factory in Arizona that can do something like this at least until 2030. Constellation will be Nvidia’s new headquarters in Taipei and will come to stay permanently: 4,000 engineering professionals will work in that center that according to Huang It will be operational by 2030. It is no longer that it buys in Taiwan, it is that the most valuable semiconductor company in the world is building the heart of its R&D in that core, an island 10,000 kilometers from the United States. A splash of cold water on Trump’s aspirations. Context. In January 2026, Taiwanese companies they committed to invest $250 billion in semiconductors and AI in the United States, as part of a trade agreement with Washington. Because Taiwan and the US are a symbiosis: each needs the other to maintain its position in the race for AI. The investment of a private company like Nvidia is another expression of this pact. In fact, Nvidia is not the only one: AMD is doing exactly the same: associate with Taiwanese manufacturers such as ASE, SPIL and Wiwynn with their Helios AI platform on the horizon (expected for the second half of 2026). That the two largest AI chip designers in the world strengthen ties with Taiwan is confirmation that the island’s industry is strategically necessary for the entire industry, not a particular bet by one firm. The elephant in the room: China. China’s role in this story is twofold: it is a threat and also a client. According to Reutersin 2026 Chinese companies have placed orders for more than two million units of the H200. Trade restrictions have made the operation difficult, but they have not been able to prevent it. One of the last cases point upon the arrival of a shipment of Nvidia AI chips to China via Japan. Nvidia lives in a contradiction from which it cannot escape: Its supply chain is on an island that China considers its own. China, which is its largest potential market, is blocked. Washington prohibits him from selling to Beijing while asking for independence from Taipei. And judging by his statements, Jensen Huang has bet everything on continuing to walk that wire. Yes, but. The Nvidia CEO forgot one problem in his speech: Taiwan makes the overwhelming majority of the world’s most advanced chips, but TSMC’s diversification into Arizona, Japan and Germany will not be ready before 2028 at best. That is to say, there are almost four years ahead in which Nvidia depends totally on Taiwan, a country that matters 97% of your energy. Furthermore, the atmosphere in the Strait of the same name is increasingly heated. Concentrating the production of its most critical component in a geographically hot spot is dangerous to say the least: if something explodes, there is no plan B. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has reminded us of this the hard way. In Xataka | Huawei has found a way to counteract US sanctions: overcoming Moore’s Law In Xataka | US companies have always had a hard time making a lot of money in China. One industry is the exception: chips Cover | freepik and Jimmy Liao

They promised us Rapunzel’s hair with very expensive cosmetics. Science says the real secret has been in your kitchen for millennia

by

Mythical representations of women, whether Botticelli’s Venus, the Hindu goddess Lakshmi or the maidens of Arthurian legends, often share an unmistakable trait: long, flowing and seemingly unattainable hair. It’s easy to think that such lengths are confined to the realm of mythology, untouched by the harsh reality of split ends and frizz. However, just swipe through TikTok or Instagram to find content creators sporting hair that would rival Rapunzel herself. Many of these influencers They promise that your hair has grown at a dizzying rate thanks to a specific technique: hair oiling or hair oiling. But, faced with shelves full of exotic formulas and luxury serums, an inevitable question arises: do we really need expensive products or has the ancient secret always been hidden in our kitchen in the form of olive oil? The resurgence of an ancient ritual. Although the term hair oiling It may sound like a modern invention packaged for Generation Z, the reality is very different. This practice was not born yesterday under the ring of light of a smartphone. Hair oiling is a technique deeply rooted in ayurvedic medicine from India, with Sanskrit texts from more than 5,000 years ago that already recommended infusing hair with natural oils to restore its shine and relax the mind. Likewise, in ancient Egypt also ointments were used based on animal fat or castor oil for similar purposes. What has changed then? The showcase. He hair oiling In a few months it has gone from being a “legacy trick” to an essential aesthetic ritual. Social media has choreographed it into a highly recognizable scene that includes a slow massage, meticulous application of oils before washing, a warm towel, and blow-drying to an incredibly shiny finish (glossy). Among the avalanche of coconut, argan and jojoba oils, olive oil has begun to reclaim its throne, not only because of its accessibility, but because it has historically been the cornerstone of Mediterranean cosmetics and the basis for extracting the properties of countless medicinal plants. The science behind the shine. Beyond visual aesthetics, the big question is whether slathering your hair in oil really works. The answer from science is a resounding yes, although with important nuances. Rocío Lajarín, doctor in Pharmacy and CEO of Alma Secret, explains in GQ that hair is made up of 90% proteins, mainly keratin. “When we use oils with structural affinity, we manage to reduce protein loss and reinforce the resistance of the hair shaft,” he says. The portal Healthline adds that regular oiling reduces “hygral fatigue” (the repetitive swelling and drying of the hair fiber when wet), acting as a cement that protects the cuticles. If we focus on “liquid gold”, clinical studies support its many benefits: Deep hydration and elasticity: An investigation of the Journal of Cosmetic Science demonstrates how olive oil It penetrates the hair fiber thanks to its high content of essential fatty acids, significantly improving hydration and resistance to breakage. A cocktail of vitamins: Virgin olive oil rejuvenates hair because it contains vitamin E, vitamin C (which stimulates collagen formation) and vitamin A (enhancers cell regeneration). Shield against damage and the sun: The International Journal of Trichology emphasizes that extra virgin olive oil contains hydroxytyrosol, a polyphenol that fights free radicals and cellular damage induced by UV-A rays. In addition, it is highly effective in reducing damage after subjecting hair to chemical processes such as dyes. Antifungal action: The same International Journal of Trichology points out that olive oil has an inhibitory influence on fungi that attack hair, such as Microsporum gypseum. The great debate: Does it make hair grow? This is where dermatology collides with internet myths. Dermatologist Andrea Combalia warns in Telva that at hair oiling “Many benefits are being attributed to it that are not real, such as hair growing faster or increasing its density.” Doctors consulted in Cleveland Clinic They agree that growth rate and thickness are predetermined by genetics, age and hormones. Oils prevent breakage (allowing length to be retained), but do not accelerate the growth phase from the follicle. However, dermatologist Ana Molina contributes in Trends a fascinating fact. It has been observed that the phytoestrogens present in olive oil can have an antiandrogenic effect by inhibiting the enzyme 5-alpha-reductase (which converts testosterone into DHT). Since DHT causes miniaturization of follicles in androgenetic alopecia, “phytoestrogens may help prevent or slow its progression.” Roots or just tips? This is the point of greatest controversy. Oiling the scalp before washing protects the lipid barrier of the skin against the aggressive surfactants in the shampoo. However, hairdresser Daniel Gil in Marie Claire and Dr. Steven Walker in GQ They are blunt: if you have an oily scalp or suffer from seborrheic dermatitis, you should avoid applying oils directly to the roots. Dr. Shilpi Khetarpal of the Cleveland Clinic confirms this: if you are prone to dandruff, applying oil can worsen the problem by feeding the fungus Malasseziacausing more inflammation. In these cases, the hair oiling It should be strictly from medium to ends. A ritual with common sense. At the end of the day, olive oil is not going to rewrite your hair genetics or magically transform you into a Renaissance painting. What science tells us is much more pragmatic and, at the same time, liberating. The true value of this trend lies in understanding hair care as a ritual that respects our natural hair structure, and not as a compulsive accumulation of synthetic cosmetics. Olive oil is a powerful, accessible and dermatologically endorsed tool to defend our hair from pollution, the heat of straighteners and daily wear and tear. Applied with common sense, the liquid gold of our Mediterranean diet is also confirmed as the best cosmetic in our bathroom. Image | Photo by Curology on Unsplash Xataka | For years we blamed stress for baldness without understanding why. Science has just found the missing link

The manufacturers promised them happy with “Ultra” phones up to the top of specs. The RAM crisis has other plans for them

by

Being an Ultra is not usually the best, unless you are a mobile phone. For years, manufacturers have been throwing darts at each other, launching models designed by and to demonstrate muscle. There was a manufacturer who threw the first stone, and the rest began to follow him. Today, with the component crisis that AI is causing, are in danger. The beginning of everything. The first “Ultra” mobile phone on the market was the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra. The company did a fairly marketing exercise: 108 megapixel camera, 100x zoom… everything in a big way. Was it the best Galaxy to date? Yes. Was it a strategy to set a new industry standard through an even more striking surname? Also. China wakes up. China was quick to react to Samsung’s message. Xiaomi responded with the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultraa phone that debuted 120W fast charging (absolute nonsense a few years ago), 120x zoom to surpass Samsung, and even a transparent finish to show off its hardware. It was the first Chinese mobile phone to fully enter the war: “we are going to put absolutely everything we can into a mobile phone, whether it is useful or not.” And from then on, the party began. Raised to the absurd. The war to launch increasingly powerful Ultra models is beginning to move away from its original objective. Samsung launched a first model with oversized specs, but with a certain commercial purpose. Manufacturers like Vivo launch phones like the 300Ultra They are sold directly in a kit that makes their price practically unattainable, and some of the direct rivals of Samsung and Apple surpass Western brands in price. Chinese manufacturers do not want to sell them, they want to continue demonstrating technological leadership. in check. As pointed out Ice Universethe flagship Ultra is in danger, and some of the big Chinese brands are considering pausing this product line. The Chinese Ultra is not born to sell in volume, and the Pro models or series number (Xiaomi 17simply) are those who are born to sell, even in China. The increase in costs of components such as internal memory or RAM makes launching Ultra models even more complicated, unless the manufacturer wants to raise the price to the absurd. Yes, but. Despite Ice’s predictions, it seems unlikely that the RAM crisis could completely knock down the Ultra models. Manufacturers have been betting for years on a strategy that allows them to reduce costs and continue advancing in their product line: launching exactly the same mobile year after year, but with some additional touches. This allows you to contain costs, recycle parts and reduce R&D spending, while maintaining memory configurations that cannot be reversed. Be that as it may, it seems inevitable that the RAM crisis will completely affect the mobile market, and that in 2027 we will see progress in dribs and drabs. In Xataka | The best mobile phones (2026), we have tested them and here are their analyzes

AI promised to decentralize knowledge. It’s doing exactly the opposite.

by

The entire AI debate revolves around the same thing: employment, deepfakes, copyright, automation. They are reasonable questions. But there is one that matters on a higher level: who controls what the AI ​​considers to be the truth? Because AI, which seemed like the great decentralizer, is actually the most centralizing technology since the printing press. The backdrop. When the printing press arrived, Protestant reformers saw it as the end of the papal monopoly on knowledge: if anyone could read the Bible, the pope lost his authority. And they were partly right. But the printing press also standardized English as the dominant language, liquidated regional dialects and, in the process, made the modern State possible: without cheap and reproducible text there are no uniform laws or large-scale tax collection. What seemed like a liberation was also a centralization. Only it took us two centuries to realize it. Between the lines. With AI the process goes much faster. When Google shows a response from Gemini in AI Overviewshalf of the users it doesn’t click on anything anymore and 26% close the search directly. Searches without clicks have gone from 54% to 72%. The open web, with all its diversity and chaos, is losing users to a single synthesized answer, such as journalist Jerusalem Demsas has analyzed in The Argument. And that response is not neutral. The LLMs They train mainly with large Anglophone newspapers, Wikipedia and academic texts. Local or minority sources hardly exist in the corpus. And during fine-tuning the models are calibrated to align with expert consensus and avoid awkward positions. It is not a mirror of human diversity but a photo of what appears at the center of it. Yes, but. It can be argued that users can ask the AI ​​to defend any position and that diversity is in use if not in production. It is an argument that has some reason. But the printing press also produced very varied content, what was centralized was who set the standards. Here the standards are set by a corpus Made in Silicon Valley for Western chatbots. The case of Grok It is quite illustrative. When Musk tried to move the model away from the progressive consensus, the system began generating anti-Semitic content within days. He had to turn back. The values ​​of an LLM are not in a superficial layer that can be retouched, they are stuck in the corpus from the beginning. The big question. ChatGPT is getting closer to the billion weekly users. Elite models are developed by a few companies: OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, mainly. We can add xAI. What comes next comes from China: DeepSeek, Moonshot, Alibaba… The researchers of these elite models, to a large extent, have studied in the same places, have worked in the same offices and share, in general terms, the same cultural references. The risk of this decentralization is not that AI lies more than Google. The risk is that when AI makes mistakes, it does so towards the center, not towards conspiracism. The risk is that this center is being set, without anyone having decided, by a few people in San Francisco. In Xataka | As far as we know, the agency that supervises AI in Spain is not supervising anything. What it does have is an Ideas Laboratory Featured image | Xataka

The ‘vibe coding’ promised to democratize software. Your first gift is 5,000 apps with open sensitive data

by

An investigation by the firm RedAccess has found more than 5,000 applications created with tools vibe coding which practically lack authentication. Anyone who stumbles upon its URL can enter. Of those 5,000, 2,000 appeared to contain private data upon inspection. The finding covers apps generated with Lovable, Replit, Base44 and Netlify, four of the platforms that have most popularized describing a program with words and letting a LLM write it. Why is it important. The promise of vibe coding is that anyone, without knowing how to program, can build software. The catch is that this same “anyone” also doesn’t know what questions to ask an application before releasing it on the Internet. The result is a new category of breaches caused not by careless employees or advanced attackers, but by people who have thrown together an internal tool in an afternoon without going through anyone on the security team. In detail. Researchers have located these applications by doing normal searches on Google and Bing, combining the domains of each platform with generic terms. Nothing of hacking: It’s more like reverse engineering a search engine. What appeared behind those URLs included hospital quadrants with doctor data, company strategy presentations, complete records of chatbot conversations with customers (with names and telephone numbers), and freight books from transport companies. In some cases, access even allowed them to gain administrator privileges and expel others. Between the lines. The platforms involved have responded with the predictable argument: it is the user’s fault. Replit remembers that its apps can be marked as private with one click. Base44 maintains that its access controls are robust and that disabling them is a conscious decision. Lovable points out that its role is to provide tools, not configure them for anyone. It is a valid argument and, above all, comfortable. It is also the same one that Amazon used with the buckets Misconfigured S3 leaking Verizon data or from WWE: the setting was there, but the user didn’t find it. The context. He vibe coding takes an old problem to a new level. Every time a layer of abstraction has democratized a craft (like spreadsheets, the wrappers of AI or web templates), the newly arrived group has arrived without the baggage of good practices that the previous one had. What changes now is the speed. Someone from a non-technical department can create a tool in two minutes and upload it to production without it going through IT. Yes, but. The AI ​​models that generate the code are not neutral agents. They do what is asked of them, no more, no less. If no one tells them “protect this in X way and implement Y,” they won’t do it. Security by default is still not a learned behavior in most of these tools, and that is a design decision of the platforms, not the end user. The consequence is foreseeable. There are going to be many more leaks like the ones RedAccess has caught before the industry internalizes that a “publish” button should not coexist with a privacy setting hidden three menus below. In Xataka | I have lived the “miracle” of vibe coding: this is how I programmed an Android TV app without having any idea about programming Featured image | Xataka

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.