Ukraine

If you thought the crisis in Hormuz was enough, the war in Ukraine has triggered another maritime drama in Europe: the Gulf of Finland

by

About five years ago, the container ship Ever Given became stuck in the Suez Canal for six daysblocking one of the most important commercial arteries in the world and leaving hundreds of ships trapped waiting. That incident, caused by a failed maneuver and adverse wind conditions, was enough to disrupt global supply chains in a matter of hours. A new seafront. As global attention focuses on the Strait of Hormuz, the war in Ukraine has opened another critical scenario much closer to Europe: the Gulf of Finlanda small but key space for Russian energy exports. There, far from spectacular drones or large fleets, the conflict manifests itself in a more silent way but just as revealingwith ships detained, routes blocked and growing tension between actors trying to avoid a direct escalation. This new focus demonstrates that the war is not only being fought on the land front, but also in the nerve centers of maritime trade. Ukraine attacks and a collapse. The situation has its origins in a clear kyiv strategy: to hit key russian ports to export oil, such as Ust-Luga and Primorsk, where it comes a fundamental part of the income that finances the war. The attacks have drastically reduced the operational capacity of these facilities, leaving dwhole days without activity and causing an immediate chain effect. The result: a unprecedented maritime traffic jamwith dozens of oil tankers (many of them linked to the so-called “floats in the shadows” Russian) accumulating waiting to be able to load. A system on the limit. They remembered this week in Political that this traffic jam in the Gulf of Finland is not just a striking image, but a symptom of something deeper: an energy and logistics system that begins to fracture under the pressure of war. Unlike conventional vessels, these tankers cannot be easily redirected to other ports due to the risk of being detained or sanctioned, which forced to remain anchored for days or weeks. As a result, there is an unusual concentration of aging and, in many cases, unsafe ships in European waters that were not prepared to absorb that volume. Europe trapped between control and escalation. Under this scenario, countries like Estonia and Finland They are in a particularly delicate position, since, despite being within the NATO framework, they have chosen not to intervene directly against these ships. The reason is clear: any attempt to stop or board an oil tanker could trigger a Russian military responseas already happened when a Russian fighter intervened to protect one of these ships. Since then, Moscow has reinforced its naval presence in the area, making it clear that it considers these strategic routes a red line. The Mirror of Hormuz. There is no doubt, what happens in the Gulf of Finland connects directly with the crisis in Hormuz: In both cases, the war moves towards maritime straits where traffic control becomes a strategic tool. The difference is that there is no formal block here, but an indirect disruption which generates similar effects, with stopped ships, tense routes and altered markets. In both scenarios, it is enough to interfere enough to collapse the system, and also without the need for a total shutdown. A war that spreads across the map. If you like, the result is a conflict that is no longer limited to Ukraine either to the Middle Eastbut it extends to the critical nodes of global trade, affecting Europe directly. The Gulf of Finland has thus become in another hot spot where energy, legal and military interests intersect, with an extremely fragile and volatile balance. And what seemed like a localized war is proving to have a much greater scope, generating new sources of tension that, like in Hormuz, can escalate quickly. without prior notice. Image | LAC, NormanEinstein In Xataka | If fog was deadly in Ukraine’s winter, spring is offering Russia a key advantage: greenery In Xataka | Ukraine is close to what no one has achieved in a war: shooting down missiles for less than a million dollars

Neither drones nor missiles nor AI, the war in Ukraine has turned a vehicle from 1950 into a key piece: the M113

by

Some of the most produced military vehicles in history exceed 80,000 units manufactured and remain in service in dozens of countries decades after their design. In many cases, their longevity is not due to their power, but to something much simpler: that they simply work, are easy to repair, and never completely disappear. An unexpected veteran. While the algorithms and drones freelancers starred on all the covers of war innovationsin recent times the war in Ukraine has turned in key piece to a vehicle from the 1950s as it was the M113and that says much more about the conflict than any next-generation system. On a battlefield dominated by advanced technology, this armored transport has resurfaced not because it is the most powerful, but because it fits better than anyone else in a war of attrition where the important thing is not sophistication, but the ability to resist, move and continue operating day after day. Simple wins. The M113 was designed for another timebut its qualities (mobility, mechanical simplicity and ease of production) make it have converted surprisingly effective in Ukraine. The reason: in an environment saturated with drones and artillery, where any vehicle can be destroyed in seconds, the key is not so much to survive everything as to be able to be repaired quickly and return to the front. Its ability to operate off-road, transport troops or even drones and adapt with improvised protections makes it a versatile tool in a conflict where conditions are constantly changing. Drones and the rules. The truth is that the proliferation of drones has reduced the usefulness of many traditional systems, including heavy tanks, forcing both sides to rethink how they move and fight. In this context, the M113 does not stand out for its weapons, but for its logistical function: carry soldiers, equipment or drones to forward positions. War, from that perspective, is no longer decided so much by direct fire, but by who manages to best position their resources in an environment monitored from the air, and there this vehicle fits perfectly. Russian “Giga Turtle” captured by Ukrainians Meanwhile, Russia adapts in its own way. On the other side of the front, in recent weeks Russia has attempted to respond with radically different solutions, such as the return of called “giga turtle”in essence, over-armored versions of tanks designed to resist drone attacks. Huge and slow, these machines prioritize protection over mobility, making them easier targets despite their toughness. His reappearance reflects the same conclusion that has been imposed on the battlefield: vehicles are still necessary, but they must adapt to a constant threat from the air. War of attrition and quantity. Ultimately, the success of the M113 It also has to do with something much more basic: that there is a glarge amount of stock available for these models. Thousands of units produced over decades allow Ukraine to quickly replace losses in a war where attrition is brutal. In other words, compared to more expensive and scarce modern systems, this vehicle offers something essential for the fight: continuity. In an extremely slow conflict that is already measured in years, it is not whoever has the most advanced weapon who wins, but whoever can continue fighting the longest. The real change is conceptual. If you like, all this points to a deeper conclusion: the war in Ukraine is not necessarily rewarding the newest, but rather the most useful in an extreme context. AND the M113 symbolizes this change like few others, where cutting-edge technology coexists with solutions from another era that they still work because they respond better to the real needs of combat. In a scenario dominated by drones, sensors and constant fire, the key is not so much to reinvent warfare, but to adapt to it, even if that means returning to vehicles designed more than half a century ago. Image | Armed Forces In Xataka | While everyone was looking at Iran, a drone has made a hole so big that it seems impossible to cover it: the one in the roof of Chernobyl In Xataka | Russia is building its largest warship in the Black Sea. You know it, we know it and the Ukrainian drones know it

If you think that renovating your house is urgent, think about this building in Ukraine. Its hole is so big that it is a danger for Europe

by

He Chernobyl accident released so much radiation that some areas they remain uninhabitable almost four decades later. In fact, the plant continues to house materials capable of remaining dangerous for thousands of years. Therefore, keeping them under control is one of the greatest engineering challenges ever faced in Europe. A challenge that a drone has put to the test. It was to last a century. The story we tell it a few months ago. The gigantic steel arch built over Chernobyl reactor 4 was conceived as a definitive solution to contain the worst nuclear accident in history for at least a hundred years, a colossal structure designed to isolate the ancient “sarcophagus” and buy humanity time. More than 100 meters high and capable of housing entire monuments inside, this system had to resist extreme conditions and allow the safe decommissioning of the reactor, encapsulating hundreds of tons of radioactive material that remain active decades after the disaster. The impact that changed everything. But everything changed in February 2025when a drone attack in the middle of the night pierced that shell seemingly invulnerable, opening a breach in the structure and exposing a system that was never designed to operate in a war environment. Although there were no immediate leaks or casualties, the damage compromised critical functionsespecially ventilation that controls humidity and prevents corrosion, introducing a silent but growing risk that could degrade the structure in a few years. What is still hidden under the steel. Under the damaged arch remains an environment extremely unstable: remains of the reactor, tons of nuclear fuel and melts of highly radioactive materials that continue to react slowly. The old “sarcophagus,” hastily built in 1986, was never structurally reliableand is actually completely dependent on the new cover to maintain the insulation. In other words, if that balance fails, the risk is not immediate, but potentially devastating, with the possibility of release radioactive dust that the wind could disperse throughout Europe. A “reform” as expensive as it is complex. System restore will not be neither quick nor easysince it involves working in conditions of high radiation, with strict limitations on time and exposure for operators. Temporary solutions barely contain the most urgent damage, while full restoration will require rebuilding highly specialized internal layers within a structure designed as a technical “sandwich”. We are talking about an estimated cost that exceeds 500 million of euros, a figure that reflects both the technical complexity and the hostile environment in which repairs must be carried out. The war enters Europe’s greatest nuclear risk. If you like, the incident it is not isolatedbut part of a context in which nuclear infrastructure have become exposed elements within an active conflict. Paradoxically, the Chernobyl exclusion zone that we had to protect from any danger has been the scene of military operationstroop movements and constant overflights of missiles and drones, which multiplies the risk of new impacts, whether accidental or intentional. In that scenario, even a technical failure or trajectory error could trigger consequences continental in scope. A reminder of what never ended. They remembered in a special from the Financial Times this week that, decades after the accident, Chernobyl remains the same latent threat, one that requires constant vigilance and international cooperation, and the drone impact has revealed the fragility of the systems designed to contain it. The infrastructure that was to definitively close the disastrous episode of 1986 now faces a new type of risk, thus demonstrating that nuclear safety depends not only on engineering, but also of geopolitical stabilitya (and common sense). In that delicate balance, each crack is not just a structural failure, but a warning about the limits of our ability to control the consequences of our own creations. Image | EBRD In Xataka | Drones in Ukraine have mutated into a system reminiscent of the Alien universe: an exoskeleton turns troops into super soldiers In Xataka | Iran is exploiting the US’s weak point: it is not its F-35s or its Patriot missiles, it is the bill every time they take off

from 164 euros in Ukraine to 4,789 euros in Switzerland

by

There is something that draws powerful attention when placed on the same map he minimum wage in all European countries: the difference between one and the other is not a crack, it is an abyss. Two workers on the same continent and working the same day can finish the month with a payroll that doesn’t even look like it. The data of Eurostat on the minimum wage in 2026 confirm this. The portal Visual Capitalist has collected this data and has represented it on a map in which the Minimum Interprofessional Wage of each country in Europe can be compared at a glance, recording the salary (and economic) variety of the continent. What is the minimum wage and why does it matter? He minimum wage It is the lowest remuneration established by law that an employer can legally pay to its workers. In this way, employees are guaranteed a decent standard of living and avoid situations of labor exploitation. According to the European Labor Authority (EURES), this minimum wage also contributes to reducing inequality economic and contributes to internal consumption across countries, as lower-paid workers tend to spend a higher proportion of their income. Not all countries establish this minimum wage the same. Austria, Denmark, Finland, Italy and Sweden do not have a legal minimum wage and leave this negotiation in the hands of unions and companies through collective agreements. Swiss It also does not have a federal threshold and each canton negotiates its own minimum wage. For example, the minimum wage in Geneva in 2024 was 24.59 francs per hour, which is about 4,640 euros per month, but rent in Geneva ranges between 1,580 and 2,630 euros and compulsory health insurance exceeds 370 euros per adult. This means that a considerable part of the salary disappears into fixed expenses, while in other European countries covering these fixed costs would be much more affordable. Comparing minimum wage figures between countries without taking into account the cost of living can lead to misleading conclusions. A salary of 1,139 euros in Poland is equivalent, in terms of purchasing power, to more than 1,800 euros in countries with a higher cost of living such as Germany or France. Those who earn the most: Western Europe at the forefront Within the scope of the European Union, Luxembourg leads the table with a minimum wage of 2,704 euros per month, followed by Ireland with 2,391 euros, Germany with 2,343 euros and the Netherlands with an SMI of 2,295 euros. If we look at the continental neighbors that are not part of the EU, the minimum wage in the United Kingdom is applied by age ranges, so those over 21 years of age earn 12.71 pounds per hour (the equivalent of about 15.20 euros). This implies that their minimum salary would be about 2,279 euros per month for a standard working day of 37.5 hours per week. Eastern Europe below average The lower minimum wages They occur in the eastern half of Europe, with Bulgaria as the EU country with the lowest SMI with 551 euros per month, followed by Hungary with 727 euros, Latvia with an SMI of 740 euros and Romania with 797 euros. The difference between Luxembourg and Bulgaria is abysmal, with a wage gap between the two countries that exceeds 2,150 euros, in two countries with the same currency and the same single market. Outside the community bloc, Ukraine sets the continent’s record with just 164 euros per month according to the data from Eurostat, which means that a minimum wage worker in Luxembourg earns more than 16 times more per month than one in Ukraine. Spain: the SMI as a thermometer of low salaries In Spain, the last increase in the SMI was applied in February 2026, leaving it with a gross salary of 1,221 euros per month in 14 payments (1,424.50 euros gross in 12 payments). That salary places Spain in tenth place of the table, just behind the 1,802 euros of France and ahead of the 1,278 euros of Slovenia. Spain has been one of the countries that has increased this minimum wage the most, going from 735 euros in 2018 to the 1,381 euros it had in 2025, as shown in Eurostat statistics. The underlying problem in Spain is that the SMI has become the most common salaryso far from being an exceptional floor for less qualified jobs, it acts as the usual salary for entire sectors. Salary statistics reflect that the latest increases in the SMI have served to push upwards the lowest salariescreating a salary pyramid with an excessively wide base and some intermediate sections that they have not risen at the same rate. In Xataka | Finding a job had always been a good way to escape poverty: in Spain it is no longer true Image | VisualCapitalist

Satellite images have revealed the location of Russia’s largest warship, and that means Ukraine can see it too

by

During the Second World War there was a announcement to sailors of future conflicts: some of the largest ships ever built were destroyed without having barely entered combat, becoming symbols of how vulnerable even the most advanced weaponry can be. Decades later, with the advent of commercial satellites and precision weapons, that exposure is even greater. Few doubts from space. The latest images satellites show a reality that is difficult to ignore: Russia is about to complete his largest warship in the Black Sea. The superstructure is practically complete, the flight deck is now fully identifiable and the work is advancing towards its final phase with key elements almost ready. However, this same monitoring from space also reveals the another side of the projectsince the ship remains motionless in a shipyard located within the reach of the ukrainian attack systemsmaking each advancement a race against time where finishing it is only half the challenge. Global ambition. He Ivan Rogov represents much more than a new ship for the Russian fleet, since it is conceived as a projection platform of force capable of operating far from its coasts and sustaining complex operations. With the capacity to transport hundreds of marines, military vehicles and an air wing of attack and transport helicopters, the ship fits into the category of large amphibious ships used by Western powers. Its size, greater than 200 meters, would make it in the greatest asset of the Russian fleet in the Black Sea, which reinforces its not only military, but also symbolic value within Moscow’s strategy. Born from failure. The existence by Ivan Rogov is directly linked to an earlier strategic setback, when Russia attempted to acquire Mistral-class amphibious ships from France and the deal was canceled after the annexation of Crimea in 2014. From then on, Moscow was forced to develop your own designgiving rise to project 23900which combines its own technology with knowledge partially acquired during that failed contract. This context explains why the ship has a special weight within Russian military planning, since it symbolizes both the need for industrial autonomy and the ability to move forward despite sanctions and technological limitations. Protected, but not untouchable. The ship is being built in the Zaliv shipyardin Crimea, a facility that Russia has reinforced with multiple layers of protection to reduce the risk of attacks. Physical barriers, networks against naval drones and security measures have been deployed at the access to the dam, in addition to indirectly benefiting from the air defense that protects nearby strategic infrastructures such as the Kerch bridge. However, these measures do not guarantee invulnerability, since Ukraine has shown repeatedly its ability to attack targets in depth and degrade defensive systems, keeping the shipyard within a risk zone constant. Investment under threat. Russia has maintained the project despite economic difficulties, sanctions and pressure derived from the war, which implies a huge investment of around of 1,200 million of dollars and a sustained commitment of industrial resources. This effort reflects the strategic importance that Moscow attributes to the ship, but also increases the associated risk, since the loss of the Ivan Rogov would mean not only a military setback, but also a economic and reputational blow significant. In other words, the project has become a high-risk bet for Russia where success or failure will have an impact that goes beyond the ship itself. The real change. Beyond of the specific destination of the warship, what the case reveals is a deeper change in the nature of modern warfare, one where the military industry ceases to be a safe space in the rear and becomes on a direct target. In that sense, Ukraine does not need to confront an entire fleet to weaken Russia, but can instead focus at critical points such as shipyards, energy infrastructure or supply chains, affecting production capacity before systems even enter combat. In short, the displacement of the conflict towards the industrial base alters traditional rules and demonstrates that, in the current context, a weapon can be destroyed long before it has the opportunity to be used. Image | x In Xataka | With the arrival of good weather in Ukraine, Russia thought it was a good idea to bring out its hidden tanks. It wasn’t at all In Xataka | An exoskeleton worthy of ‘Alien’ or ‘Death Stranding’: the war in Ukraine is bringing the future sooner than expected

With the arrival of good weather in Ukraine, Russia thought it was a good idea to bring out its hidden tanks. It wasn’t at all

by

In 2022, many analysts assumed that tanks would remain the undisputed symbol of land power, but four years later the battlefield has evolved to the point where multi-ton vehicles can be neutralized for systems that fit in a backpack and cost thousands of times less. A return at the worst time. Winter is giving way to spring in Ukraine, and Russia has decided it was time to bring out its armored vehicles again after almost one year of limited useconvinced that she could regain initiative on the front. However, this movement has collided head-on with the current reality of the battlefield: an environment saturated with drones, remote mines and sensors where any concentration of vehicles becomes an almost immediate target. What on paper should have been an offensive reactivation has translated, in its first stages, in massive losses of material, with mechanized attacks that have ended in authentic “massacres” in a matter of minutes. From hiding to exposing yourself. For much of the last year, Russia had chosen to reduce the use of vehicles and advance with small groups of infantry to minimize their exposure. That tactic, although costly in lives, was more difficult to neutralize in a battlefield dominated by drones. But the enormous human wear and tear (with hundreds of thousands of casualties) has forced Moscow to rethink its approach. The return to mechanized attacks is not so much a choice as a necessity: replacing men with machines, even if that means assuming a new type of vulnerability. The Soviet heritage. It we have counted on other occasions. To sustain this change, Russia has begun to turn to its deeper reservesreactivating T-72 tanks from the 1970s and 1980s that remained in storage for years. This movement reveals an important turn in the contest, because it is no longer about deploying the best available, but rather to maintain volume at any price. The Russian military industry is still capable of regenerating units, but increasingly with older materialmore heterogeneous and less adapted to an environment where threats come from above and not from the front. A battlefield that does not forgive armor. The problem from the Moscow sidewalk is that the context has radically changed. Drones, capable of detecting, tracking and attacking vehicles with great precision, have turned mechanized advances into operations andxtremely risky. Added to this are remotely deployed mines and coordinated attacks that turn any movement in a trap. What was once the spearhead of offensives now behaves like a slow, visible and predictable target, especially when deployed in a group. Hit logistics to wear out. In addition, a parallel strategy is added to this direct pressure on the vehicles: the continuous attack to the rear. The Ukrainian coups against fuel tankslogistics nodes and supply centers seek to make any accumulation of armored vehicles on the front meaningless. And without fuel and maintenance, even a large number of vehicles lose operational value. Thus, the Russian problem is not only how many tanks you can deploy, but how long you can keep them functioning in real combat conditions. Accelerate burnout. In short, Russia appears to be trading a depleting resource (the labor) for another that is also beginning to become scarce: his armored legacy of the Cold War. In the short term it may be able to sustain the pressure on the front, but if current losses continue, the material cost can quickly grow to become unsustainable. In that scenario, the return of the tanks It does not seem to represent a return to conventional warfare, but rather a risky bet on a battlefield that has already evolved. faster than them. Image | Telegram In Xataka | Iran is winning the war with “Ukrainian mathematics”: there is no need to shoot down US fighters, it is enough to force them to take off In Xataka | Europe’s fear of an unprecedented situation in the Mediterranean: a Ukrainian drone has left a ticking bomb floating

Ukraine and the secret of its energy shield

by

In 1973, a political decision was enough to unleash a global energy crisis. Today, that same effect can be caused by a swarm of drones or a few naval mines. Meanwhile, the infrastructures that support the world’s supply remain, in many cases, enormous facilities designed for another era, when the greatest danger came from the sky in the form of missiles, not small, cheap and constant threats. The five-day countdown. Five days leftactually slightly less than four troops, so that a specific threat can change the global energy balance, and it all starts with a tactical move: the United States has gone from a 48-hour ultimatum to bomb Iranian power plants to a five day break supported by diplomatic contacts that are still very weak. We are talking about a maneuver that does not imply real de-escalation but time gained to avoid a step that could trigger immediate retaliation throughout the region and, above all, convert the energy infrastructure in priority objective of open war. The real fear. The key to these hours is not only in the military fronts, but in the possibility that the conflict begins to knock down energy nodes systematically. The United States has come to put the attack on the table to electrical installations Iranians. For its part, Iran has responded by threatening to mine the gulf routes Persian and turn the area into an almost blocked space. Between one thing and the other, the message is more or less clear, because the war no longer revolves only around bases, scientists or arsenals, but around cables, terminals, pumping stations, along with oil ports and maritime corridors without which the entire planet begins to tremble. Kharg, Hormuz and the heart of the industry. The Kharg island appears in this story like a lot more than a point on the map. It is the great exit center for Iranian crude oil. It is also one of the places where a military offensive would a direct effect on global oil flows. Plus: it adds to the other decisive name of this war, the Strait of Hormuzthrough which a gigantic part of the world’s crude oil trade passes. When both places enter the equation at the same time, what is at stake stops being a one-off retaliation and becomes the real possibility of a prolonged shock to the global energy industry. Ukraine, again. That’s why everyone is looking at Ukraine again. I remembered this morning the new york times that the planet does not do it only because its war turned drones into absolute protagonists of the battlefield. It does so also because it was one of the first places where it was understood that modern energy infrastructure could survive only if it was transformed into a stepped fortress. Because Russia was hitting refineries, gas plants and critical nodes for years. And Ukraine responded building a shield made of electronic warfare, interceptor drones, physical defenses, dispersion of equipment and hardening works that sought one very simple thing: to continue functioning even under constant attack. The secret: hold on. From that perspective, the main Ukrainian lesson is not to have found a perfect defense, because that may not exist. Rather, it consists of having assumed that the enemy will hit again again, and in reducing damage, protecting the most expensive components, bury part of the facilitieserect concrete barriers and add layers of jamming and interception to complicate each attack. In short, it consists of moving from the old logic of protecting large infrastructures as if they only had to resist a major bombing from the last century, to a new logic in which you have to resist repeated waves of small, cheap and constant threats. The Gulf discovers the Ukrainian problem. Because the Gulf countries had thought above all about missiles. Ukraine it took time adding to the equation the drone swarms cheap. This difference is decisive because taking down low-cost threats with very expensive systems is not sustainable for a long time. And that is where the Ukrainian experience becomes valuable for the Middle East: not because of a miraculous technology, but because it has developed a layered defense. more flexible and cheaperadapted to an enemy that can saturate the sky with relatively simple but devastating devices for gigantic and very vulnerable installations. Few days to understand where the war is going. If you like, the central idea of ​​these hours is brutally simple. There are few left less than four days to check if the pause announced by the United States It serves to cool down the war or only to bring it closer to its most dangerous phase. If it fails, the focus will no longer be just on who bombs who, but on whether the region’s energy industry can continue standing. And in that scenario, Ukraine reappears as an unexpected reference one more time. First It was the laboratory of drone warfare, and now aims to also become the emergency manual to protect power plants, plants and terminals in an era in which energy has become one of the most delicate and decisive targets on the board. Image | Ministry of Defense of Ukraine In Xataka | Iran has led the world to desperately search for energy sources. So China has made an irrefutable proposal to Taiwan In Xataka | A ship has just arrived in Iran with the most dangerous mission: to fulfill the radical plan that the US had 40 years ago

Ukraine refused to fix a bombed Russian oil pipeline. The EU has given you 90 billion reasons to do so

by

Choking off Vladimir Putin’s war machine seemed like a seamless plan for Europe, but geopolitics has a bad habit of ruining the best strategies. The outbreak of the Third Gulf War has shaken the foundations of the global energy market. Now, with prices skyrocketing and a European Union desperately searching for oil, all eyes have once again fallen on an old Soviet relic: the Druzhba pipeline (which, ironically, means “friendship” in Russian). This gigantic steel tube has today become the trench of a new cold war that threatens to fracture the EU itself. Ukraine, a victim of constant bombings, refused out of principle and security to repair a section of this pipeline that continues to supply crude oil to the European countries closest to Moscow. However, as he advances Financial Timesunprecedented pressure from Brussels and the blocking of a vital loan have forced kyiv to make a 180-degree turn and give in to its European partners. What has happened? To understand the problem, we must go back to the end of January 2026. According to the Ukrainian media Suspilne Mediaa Russian airstrike severely damaged the Brody pumping station in the western Lviv region. The flow of Russian oil transiting through Ukrainian territory towards Hungary and Slovakia was cut short. The diplomatic consequences were immediate. Hungary, which has an exemption to continue buying Russian crude due to its energy dependence, accused Ukraine of delaying reparations for political reasons. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán issued a lethal ultimatum, picked up by the chain NPR: “If there is no oil, there is no money.” A threat that was fulfilled. The Hungarian president vetoed a package of macro-financial and military aid from the European Union to Ukraine valued at 90 billion euros, in addition to blocking the twentieth package of sanctions against Russia. Faced with the risk that Ukraine would run out of funds to sustain its economy and its defense, the European Commission decided to intervene. According to PoliticalCommission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa sent a letter to Zelensky offering “technical support and financing” with European funds to repair the pipeline. Cornered by financial asphyxiation, the Ukrainian president ended up giving in and accepted the offer. “I call this blackmail”. For the kyiv government, this transfer has been an extremely bitter pill. In statements to the press collected by EuronewsVolodymyr Zelensky has not hidden his frustration, stating that forcing them to reopen the tap of Russian oil is, for practical purposes, the same as lifting sanctions on Moscow. “I openly say that I am against it. But if you give me the condition that Ukraine will not receive weapons, then, excuse me, I am powerless in this matter. I told our friends in Europe that this is called blackmail,” said the president, reproaching his country for being forced to “finance anti-European policies.” But the Hungarian blockade does not respond only to energy needs; It has a strong domestic component. As pointed out Al JazeeraHungary faces very close parliamentary elections on April 12. Orbán is nine points behind his main rival, Péter Magyar, is using the supply crisis and the figure of Zelensky as an electoral scarecrow. In fact, the Finnish Prime Minister, Petteri Orpo, did not hesitate to denounce upon his arrival in Brussels that Orbán is “using Ukraine as a weapon in his electoral campaign.” Maximum tension between kyiv and Budapest. On the ground, the situation is confusing. On the Ukrainian side, Zelensky has calculated The repairs will take about a month and a half, but at the moment there are no clear indications of what that might be like. While the agency Suspilne Media reports that a small delegation of EU engineers is already in Ukraine assessing the damage (excluding Hungarian and Slovak experts), Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi, declared to The kyiv Independent have no record of any official European mission in the country. On the Hungarian side, the escalation has gone beyond the merely rhetorical to enter the realm of physical retaliation. According to Deutsche WelleIn early March, Hungarian special forces intercepted two armored vans from the Ukrainian entity Oschadbank that were transiting from Austria. In the operation, Hungary seized $80 million in cash and 9 kilos of gold on suspicion of “money laundering.” Various legal experts consulted by the German media greatly doubt the legality of this seizure, suspecting that it is a direct retaliation for the closure of the pipeline. Zelensky, for his part, has not hesitated to describe this act as plain and simple “banditry.” Drones as the “new oil.” While forced to compromise on Russian energy, Ukraine is seeking to capitalize on its own warfare technology to gain international relevance—and funds. As detailed in an analysis of the BBCZelensky has offered the United States and the Gulf countries a $50 billion joint production deal based on Ukraine’s experience making cheap interceptor drones. “For us, this is like oil,” said the Ukrainian president, trying to position his country as a vital provider of security in the midst of the Middle East conflict. In parallel, the energy war is not limited to the Druzhba pipeline. As revealed The Moscow Timesthe Russian state company Gazprom recently denounced that Ukraine launched a wave of 26 drones against compression stations in the Krasnodar region. These infrastructures are key for the TurkStream and Blue Stream gas pipelines, which are currently one of the few remaining routes for Russia to export gas to Europe through Turkey, demonstrating that kyiv continues to try to hit the Kremlin’s energy portfolio wherever it can. The final pulse in Brussels. All this tension has led to the summit of European Union leaders that starts today, March 19, 2026, in Brussels. As he emphasizes TVP Worldthe pressure on Viktor Orbán is absolute. Upon arrival at the summit, the head of European diplomacy, Kaja Kallas, went straight to the point: “It’s time to show our support for Ukraine.” In Brussels right now they are crossing their fingers. As pointed out … Read more

There is a Russian bomb floating in the Mediterranean coming from Ukraine. And Europe trembles because it can explode at any moment

by

It is a fact that most of the world’s trade moves by sea. This means that every day thousands of ships cross key routes very close to European coasts. In this constant traffic, a single out-of-control incident is enough to put entire ecosystems in check and force several countries to react at the same time. The war in Ukraine has just ended activate one of them. A bomb adrift in the heart of Europe. The situation is the following: in the Mediterranean right now there is more than just a damaged ship, the Arctic Metagaz is a latent threat that mixes war, energy and environmental risk in a single point. We are talking about a loaded Russian tanker with gas, fuel and diesela ship hit by a drone attack from Ukraine that sails uncontrollably, with structural damage and a real risk of explosion. Not only that. It appears to have no crew, is leaking and catching fire, and is moving slowly between European waters and North Africa. What makes it especially disturbing is not only its condition, but its origin: It is one more piece of the war being fought in Eastern Europe that has ended up floating in the Mediterranean, moving the conflict directly to the doors of the entire continent. It’s not just the front anymore. The episode confirms something that was already intuited for some time: that the war between Russia and Ukraine is no longer confined to the Black Sea or the land front. Ukraine has expanded its radius of action by attacking Russian ships on much more distant routes, including those that are part of the called “ghost fleet”key to avoiding sanctions and financing the Kremlin’s war effort. These increasingly frequent attacks turn ships into de facto military targets, even if they are sailing through international waters or near European territories. The result is an extension of the conflict that blurs borders and places Europe in an uncomfortable position, because it is not a direct part of these attacks, but its potential scenario. Arctic Metagaz Ecological risk and implications. The immediate danger right now it’s pretty obvious: an explosion or massive spill in an area of ​​high ecological value could cause lasting damage in the Mediterranean, affecting protected ecosystems and coastal economies. But the problem goes beyond the environmental impact. These types of incidents also reveal to us the fragility of the maritime system in times of hybrid war, where poorly maintained, aging ships, with opaque structures and no safety guarantees, They circulate on key routes. The combination of sanctions, evasion and attacks turns these ships into risk vectors that can trigger crises at any moment. Europe and the threat. The European reactionwith Italy and France along with several EU members warning of the imminent risk, reflects a growing concern: countries have asked a coordinated response facing a problem that is not only specific, but structural. The difficulty in intervening (whether due to weather conditions, the location of the vessel or legal issues) also represents a capacity and governance vacuum in nearby waters. While Russia he ignores of incident management and points to coastal states as responsibleEurope faces a rather complex dilemma: managing the consequences of a war in which it neither controls the origin nor the evolution. Symbol of a new phase. If you also want, the derived from the Arctic Metagaz summarizes like few elements the evolution of the current conflict: a war that no longer only dynamits infrastructure on land, but is capable of turning the sea into a space constant riskwhere each asset can become a threat. It is not just, therefore, an accident or an isolated episode, but the proof (one more) that the conflict has acquired an unpredictable dimensionwhere an action in Ukraine can end up generating a crisis thousands of kilometers away. And that is precisely what it has of the nerves to Europe: not knowing when or where the next impact may materialize. Image | war-sanctions.gur.gov.ua In Xataka | While we all look at Iran, in Ukraine they continue doing their thing: robot against robot battles where humans only watch In Xataka | Ukraine has become the world’s leading specialist against Iranian drones. And he won’t share his antidote

The world is desperately asking Ukraine for its antidote to the Shahed. And Ukraine has decided to keep them for its war

by

In September 2023, a swarm of cheap drones managed to get through some of the most advanced air defenses in the world and paralyzing strategic infrastructure in the Middle East for hours. That left a conclusion for many armies: the air war of the 21st century no longer depends only on fighters or missiles that cost real fortunes, but also on small machines that can be manufactured in workshops and change the balance of the battlefield. The “antidote” that everyone is looking for. After four years of war against Russia and thousands of Shahed drone attacks, Ukraine has ended up becoming the most advanced laboratory of the world to combat this type of weapons. What began as a desperate need to defend their cities has ended up generating a complete ecosystem defense: detection networks with radars and acoustic sensors, command software that coordinates cheap interceptors and specialized pilots who have learned to confront swarms of drones in real combat conditions. That experience has awakened a enormous international interest because it solves the big problem of modern defenses: destroying cheap drones with missiles that cost millions is an unsustainable equation. Changes the economics of air defense. It we have counted other times. The Ukrainian success is explained above all by cost. While a Patriot missile can exceed four million dollars and a THAAD interceptor is around twelve million, many kamikaze drones cost between 20,000 and 50,000 dollars. Ukraine has broken that logic using tiny interceptors that can cost between $1,000 and $2,500 and that, guided by human operators and thermal sensors or radar, pursue the enemy drone until it is destroyed. Systems like the Sting interceptor (small 3D printed devices capable of reaching speeds close to 280 kilometers per hour) have demonstrated surprising effectiveness in real combat, taking down a large part of the Shahed that attack cities like kyiv. From battlefield to global product. That performance has made Ukraine the center of a new technological career. Gulf countries, European countries and allies of the United States have started calling kyiv in search of solutions to confront the same Iranian drones that Russia has been using for years on the Ukrainian front. Middle Eastern governments, concerned about attacks on oil facilities or military bases, negotiate agreements to acquire interceptors, detection systems and operational training. They not only want to buy the drones, but learn the method Ukrainian: a distributed defense model based on thousands of cheap sensors and small weapons capable of quickly responding to massive attacks. A system to copy. The demand, furthermore, is not limited to hardware. Ukraine too export knowledge. Teams of Ukrainian specialists have already been sent to several countries to explain how to detect, track and shoot down drones in large numbers. In total, at least eleven governments have requested direct assistance to replicate this low-cost air defense model. For many Western militaries, the war in Ukraine has shown that defense against drone swarms is not won with large strategic systems, but with distributed networks of sensors, software and small weapons that operate in a coordinated manner. The great paradox. However, there is a fundamental problem. Despite international interest, Ukrainian companies can’t export their interceptors. The reason? The government has prohibited the sale of defense drones because it considers that all available systems should remain in the country. Manufacturers like Wild Hornets o SkyFall constantly receive purchase requests from the Middle East and Europe, but the official response is always the same: The absolute priority is to defend Ukrainian territory itself. Like the United States. The position reflects a very clear strategic logic. Ukraine faces massive drone attacks every night and needs every interceptor it produces. Selling them in the middle of the war would mean weakening their own defense. The decision, in fact, is reminiscent of what the United States has been doing repeatedly with key weaponry during intense conflicts (the latest: in South Korea): reserve or directly move the most necessary technologies for your own operations before exporting them. In this case, kyiv is applying exactly the same logic. War laboratory. Meanwhile, the war continues to turn Ukraine into the biggest testing ground of the new era of drone combat. The country has even created a specific branch of its armed forces dedicated to unmanned systems and is developing everything from robotic submarines to long-range attack drones. In cities like kyiv, national interceptors are already they demolish more than 70% of the Shahed that fly over the region. That experience, accumulated under constant attacks, is generating innovations that many Western armies have not yet managed to replicate. Pressure of a new war. The reason international interest is growing so quickly is easy to understand: the problem that Ukraine has been facing for years starts to spread to other regions. Iranian drones are now appearing in conflicts and attacks in the Middle Eastwhere the United States and its allies have discovered that their traditional air defense systems are too expensive to confront swarms of cheap drones. Each attack forces interceptors that cost millions to be fired against devices that are worth only a few thousand. Therefore, from US military bases to oil facilities in the Gulf, half the world andis looking towards Ukraine in search of answers. Its engineers, pilots and programmers have accumulated experience that no other army has. They have learned to fight swarms of drones with limited resources and to design cheap weapons that They break economic logic of modern air warfare. An antidote that stays at home. As they counted on TWZthe scenario is summarized in governments around the world calling to kyiv and asking for the “antidote” against the Shahed, while Ukraine has made a pragmatic decision: to keep it to itself. The companies receive offersallies ask questions and specialists travel to share experience. But the weapons that really make a difference right now, those cheap interceptors that have changed air defense, continue to stay at home, because for Ukraine the war is still it’s very far determine. Image … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.