time

AI has meant that so many apps have never been launched in such a short time. The problem is that almost no one is using them.

by

A new research from MIT monitored the activity of thousands of developers before and after adopting the use of AI agents such as Claude Code or Codex. In their conclusions they have detected a singular “funnel effect”: many begin to use AI to “tinker” with the codebut few projects end in final software releases. Not only that: many more apps arrive in the application stores, but the interest they generate is practically zero. Hotfix blocks everything. When you start programming with Claude Codeeven without knowing how to do it, usually experience that feeling of “being able to do anything”, but although there are projects that manage to evolve and reach a successful conclusion, many remain in an attempt: the manual processes of quality control, code review or deployment They become bottlenecks for these projects, often carried out by people without a technical profile and without knowledge of software engineering. Producing more is not selling more. The MIT study, led by one of its economics professors, Mert Demirer, reveals another striking conclusion: producing more does not mean selling more. Although the volume of mobile applications that comes to the App Store or Google Play Store has grown spectacularly due to the ease of programming with AI, real consumption has not moved. There are many more apps, but the same consumers (and buyers), who are not downloading, trying or certainly buying more than they did. App failure. The vast majority of these new software products created with these tools fail spectacularly when it comes to capturing a minimum audience. The efficiency when creating them is not directly linked to the real usefulness of these tools or with the value that the market demands of them. The code surpasses us. Linus Torvalds already said it when speaking of how he saw the world of AI: “AI will be a tool, and it will make people more productive. I think vibe coding is great for getting people to start programming. I think (the code it generates) is going to be horrible to maintain… so I don’t think programmers will go away. You’ll still want to have people who know how to maintain the output.” His comment was a good prediction of what we are seeing now: too much code being distributed everywhere makes a review of that code necessary to validate it, but doing something like that at the rate that AI is adding code to these projects is unaffordable for human programmers, who are being overwhelmed. And costs are skyrocketing. The new AI agents that program consume a large number of tokens, which has made set off the alarms in companies like Uber or Microsoft. To mitigate the problem, a hybrid usage model is now being imposed: AI agents in the cloud, such as Claude Opus 4.8, are used to plan development, but then the code is written by cheaper cloud models, which are remarkably compliant, or even local models if the user/company has sufficient local computing capacity. Remembering the industrial revolution. Demirer remembers that something similar happened during the industrial revolution. The first factories that replaced steam engines with giant electric motors did not lead to a large increase in productivity. The real boost to efficiency came decades later, when engineers redesigned those factories from scratch by installing individual motors at each workstation. In Xataka | We believed that the AI ​​talent war is about engineers and developers. Actually, it’s about plumbers and electricians.

Today at Lidl (reduced by 50%) this De’Longhi super-automatic coffee machine, available for a limited time

by

If you are one of those who cannot start the day without a good coffee, but you are tired of spending a fortune on capsules or the hassle of manual coffee machines, Lidl has the solution. The German supermarket has dropped the price of one of the most iconic models on the market: the De’Longhi Magnifica S (ECAM12.123.B) it remains irresistible 247.99 euros. It is one of Lidl’s offers of the day, so it will only be available during this day at this price. DeLonghi ® Magnifica S automatic coffee machine ECAM12.123.B The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Although if Lidl sells out (which is likely), on Amazon you also have another De’Longhi model on sale. It is about the Magnifica S (ECAM22.110.B) which is available at a good price, for 279.99 euros. De’Longhi Magnifica S (ECAM22.110.B) – Perfetto Super-Automatic Coffee Maker The price could vary. We earn commission from these links A De’Longhi super-automatic coffee machine now for less than 280 euros The De’Longhi Magnifica S is the undisputed queen of the entry-level super-automatic range for a very simple reason: it makes spectacular coffee without complications. It has a integrated and calibrated steel conical grinderwhich allows you to grind the coffee bean just before infusion to maintain all the aroma and freshness. In addition, you can regulate the intensity, the amount of water and the temperature to your liking from its intuitive control panel. Among some of its main characteristics, the following could be highlighted: System cappuccino: Includes a stainless steel milk frother to create rich, creamy foam, perfect for preparing lattes either cappuccinos with a real barista. 15 bar pressure: ideal for achieving a dense and perfect layer of cream on espressos. Full customization: You can use both coffee beans and already ground coffee. Easy cleaning: It has automatic rinsing and descaling programs, and the infusion group is completely removable for more comfortable washing under the tap. For the price it has now in Lidl (247.99 euros) it is very difficult to find a coffee maker that offers durability, build quality and, above all, a good taste in a cup. If you like make the jump to coffee beans and forget about capsule waste, this is a perfect opportunity before the stock runs out on the Lidl website. ⚡ IN BRIEF: offer for De’Longhi Magnifica S Super-Automatic Coffee Maker (ECAM12.123.B) today ✅ THE BEST Unbeatable quality/price ratio: Below 300 euros there is no super-automatic coffee maker that offers its reliability and build quality. Quick payback: When using coffee beans, the cost per cup is much cheaper than that of capsules (Nespresso, Dolce Gusto, etc.), so it pays for itself in a few months. ❌ THE WORST Water consumption for cleaning… By purging automatically every time you turn it on and off, it uses a lot of water and requires you to empty the drip tray often. Manual vaporizer… The milk frother (panarello) requires you to move the jug to make the foam; It is not an automatic system that does it by pressing a single button. 💡 BUY IT IF… You are tired of paying a fortune for coffee in capsules and generating plastic or aluminum waste, but you are looking for the same convenience of pressing a button and having coffee ready. ⛔ DON’T BUY IT IF… Your daily coffee always has milk and you don’t want to complicate your life by texturing it yourself with the frother, a coffee maker with an automatic milk tank (like those in the Philips LatteGo range) is better for you. Other super-automatic coffee makers that may interest you Cecotec Super-automatic Coffee Maker with Vaporizer and Processing Unit 20g Cremmaet Lungo Steam The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Krups Roma, Super-automatic coffee machine The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images: Weebedia and De’Longhi In Xataka | Smart coffee makers: what you can do (and what you can’t) with connected coffee makers In Xataka | Five ideal accessories to get the most out of your super-automatic coffee machine

MediaMarkt knocks down the price of the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (and not in its minimum version) with a 41% discount for a limited time

by

If you were waiting for the right moment to renew your phone for a high-end phone with capital letters, MediaMarkt has just given it to you on a plate. Now, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ In its most ambitious storage version it is at an irresistible price. Specifically, you can get the 512 GB version for only 749 euros. Taking into account that the official sale price is 1,279 euros, we are talking about a 41% discount, or in other words, 530 euros of direct savings. Plus, shipping is free or you can choose in-store pickup at no additional cost. Samsung Galaxy S25+ 5g 6.7″ 512gb Navy Blue The price could vary. We earn commission from these links A beast in performance and with an outstanding screen He Samsung Galaxy S25+ It is one of the most balanced and powerful devices on the current market. On its front it stands out for its 6.7-inch Dynamic AMOLED display with QHD+ resolution, a fluid 120Hz refresh rate and excellent outdoor visibility. Under the hood, Samsung is betting on this mobile on the safe side, integrating the processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elitewhich ensures perfect performance in demanding games and heavy multitasking. Accompanying this processor we find 12 GB of RAM and the aforementioned 512GB storagemore than enough space to forget about space problems during the useful life of the mobile. In the autonomy section, it has a 4,900 mAh battery optimized to last the entire day and is a mobile phone that runs on the Android 17 operating system. All of this is powered by Samsung’s Artificial Intelligence ecosystem, which provides everything from real-time translation to advanced photo editing tools. As for the photographic section, it incorporates a 12 MP front camera and a triple rear camera composed of a 50 MP main sensoraccompanied by a 12 MP wide angle and a 10 MP telephoto lens. ⚡ IN BRIEF: offer for samsung galaxy s25+ today ✅ THE BEST Good performance: The Snapdragon 8 Elite processor together with 12 GB of RAM offer spectacular raw power. Supports heavy games, extreme multitasking or AI processing without any hint of slowness. Support and updates: Samsung has committed to seven years of system and security updates, so you’ll have a fully functional phone for years. ❌ THE WORST Loading speed behind its rivals… While Chinese brands already charge phones at 80, 100W or more, Samsung is still stuck on 45W fast charging and the charger is not included in the box. Without the Ultra zoom… The S25+ stays with a 3x optical zoom. If 5x or 10x super-resolution zoom is vital to you, you will have to make the jump to the Ultra model and pay a lot more. 💡 BUY IT IF… You want a large but comfortable high-end phone, since it is a mobile phone that maintains a large screen but with rounded corners and a much more comfortable weight for everyday use. ⛔ DON’T BUY IT IF… If you are looking for the absolute best camera on the market with massive zoom for nature or event photography, your option is the S25 Ultra or the iPhone 17 Pro Max. Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Javier Penalva (Xataka) and Samsung In Xataka | Best Samsung phones: which one to buy and recommended models based on budget, tastes and price quality In Xataka | The best mobile phones (2025), we have tested them and here are their analyzes

Jupiter appeared just in time to retain the elements that would allow life

by

Jupiter it’s a big planet and inhospitable, but it is quite possible that we owe life on Earth to it. And, according to a study recently published by scientists at Rice University with the support of NASAthe largest planet in the Solar System acted as a kind of gravitational dam to retain in our neighborhood some of the essential ingredients for the proliferation of living organisms. Phosphorus and nitrogen. These scientists have been based in measuring the ratio between phosphorus and nitrogen (P/N), two elements that are considered essential for life in adequate proportions. Thanks to the analysis of the composition of two different types of meteorites, it was possible to verify that, initially, the appropriate P/N ratio was concentrated in the outer part of the solar system, very far from where the Earth ended up forming. However, when the giant Jupiter was born, its great mass caused a kind of gravitational barrier that prevented the phosphorus from continuing to flow outwards and concentrate inside, in such a way that the Earth had the correct proportion of those pieces that, joined to others, could little by little give rise to the life that our planet houses today. 4.5 billion years of history. The solar system was formed from a large cloud of gas and dust 4.5 billion years ago. First, gas and dust merged to form celestial objects known as planetesimals. These collided with each other, releasing small pieces that over time became the planets and moons that the Solar System houses today. Some, however, did not constitute either of these two objects, but continued to wander in the form of asteroids. Furthermore, if these asteroids impact the Earth They are considered meteoriteswhich can be of two types. On the one hand we have iron meteorites, which are dense, metallic and composed mostly of iron and nickel. Secondly we have the chondrites, which They are rocky. The latter constitute the majority of meteorites that have been recovered on Earth. Some older than others. Today we know that iron meteorites are older than chondrites, since they were formed from a first batch of planetesimals. Chondrites were formed about 2-3 million years later. Taking this into account is very important, since it is precisely what was analyzed to verify how nitrogen and phosphorus were distributed during the dawn of the Solar System. Two other elements come into action. There are two other elements that indicate the origin of meteorites that have impacted the Earth. By analyzing the ratios of nickel and molybdenum isotopes it is possible to know whether the meteorites come from the external or internal part of the Solar System. This is important, since thanks to a series of laboratory experiments and geochemical models it was possible to verify exactly where the meteorites came from and how the levels of phosphorus and nitrogen fluctuated between them. The asteroid belt separates the outer and inner part of the Solar System From outside to inside. We already know that the first phases of the solar system can be studied in iron meteorites and the newer ones in chondrites. We also know that both can come from the external or internal part of the solar system and that this is found out by analyzing the isotopes of nickel and molybdenum. Thus, these scientists saw that the greatest high P/N was initially concentrated in the outer part of the solar system. However, later the tables turned and it began to focus on the internal region, precisely where the Earth was formed. The causes. In its initial phases, the protoplanetary disk in which the planets formed would be very hot and turbulent. These turbulences cause a strong flow of materials outwards. With increasing temperatures, phosphorus condenses inside the disk, as part of a mineral called schreibersite. Then, due to turbulence, it flows to the outside of the disk, which is much colder. The result is a buildup of phosphorus on the outside. As for nitrogen, through oxidation it is freed from some minerals that contain it, but it is very volatile, so it is maintained at lower levels. That means that in the outer layers there is a high P/N ratio. That is, much more phosphorus than nitrogen. Turn of tables. In chondrites it is observed that the tables turn. The elements of life flowed inward. This is partly because the disk is already colder after 3 million years, so there is less turbulence. But it is not enough to explain what these scientists have seen. For this reason, they consider that there is also a great influence from Jupiter. The changes occur more or less from the moment this giant planet formed. The main suspicion is that, being so large, it exerts a great gravitational influence that acts as a barrier preventing the schreibersite from escaping outward. On the other hand, due to the cooling of the disk, the nitrogen-bearing minerals stabilize on the outside. This means that the exterior is enriched in nitrogen, while the interior is impoverished. Added to the retention of internal phosphorus, the result is a high internal P/N ratio, which coincides with what we have on Earth today and, possibly, served as a starting signal for the formation of life. In short, Jupiter gave us a cable. He didn’t give us the ingredients to live, but he did prevent them from escaping our neighborhood. That was the key. Image | Comparison of the size of Jupiter and Earth (NASA) | Solar System (NASA) In Xataka | We have been studying the planets of TRAPPIST-1 for years with great hope. James Webb just knocked it down

an old trick to know what time of night wild boars appear

by

In the Middle Ages, tracking a wild boar was such a valuable skill that some nobles they spent whole days to interpret footprints, disturbed mud and almost invisible signs to find out where the animal had spent the night. In fact, the great wild boar hunts depended much more than reading the terrain than force or weapons, a tradition that survived for centuries even after the emergence of more advanced technologies. The trick that hunters of yesteryear used. Long before camera traps or drones existed, hunters resorted to simple and ingenious solutions to find out what time wild boars appeared. One of the most curious methods consisted of connect an alarm clock to a fishing line placed next to a bait station. When the animal moved a stone or touched the line while eating, the battery jumped and the clock stopped, recording the exact time of visit. The system had limitations and could fail due to rain, other animals or simple mechanical errors, but it reflects the extent to which knowing the habits of the wild boar has always been valuable information for those who lived with this species. A very adaptable animal. The obsession with understanding the wild boar has a simple explanation: it is one of the mammals most adaptable in Europe. Its varied diet, intelligence and high reproductive capacity allow it to thrive in forests, crops, marshes and even environments close to cities. This ease of taking advantage of any available resource has driven the growth of their populations during the last decades and has turned the species into a constant challenge for wildlife managers, farmers, conservationists and hunters. When population control disappears. The increase in specimens is especially visible in some protected areas where hunting activity was eliminated or significantly reduced. The ban on hunting in national parks was presented as a victory for conservation, but the passage of time has revealed that the absence of regulatory mechanisms also can cause problems. The debate, therefore, no longer revolves solely around the protection of animals, but about how to prevent a particularly successful species from altering the balance of the ecosystem. The alarm in Doñana. He most striking case is occurring in the Doñana National Park in Spain. Organizations such as Ecologistas en Acción and SEO/BirdLife have alerted that nest predation by wild boars is affecting the reproductive success of protected species such as the common blackbird and purple heron. The situation is especially striking because some of the groups that defended the elimination of hunting in these spaces are now those who warn of the effects of an increasingly abundant wild boar population. No nests and threatened species. The damage does not only affect those birds. In various areas of the marsh, wild boars have entered colonies of breeding and have destroyed eggs and chicks of species such as the slender-billed gull, the black-winged stilt, the white-faced vent or the pratincole. The ability of the wild boar to locate food and taking advantage of any opportunity makes these nesting areas especially vulnerable targets. Images of severely damaged colonies have reopened a debate that seemed closed about how to manage certain wildlife populations. Nature does not understand ideologies. Beyond the crossed accusations between conservationists and representatives of the hunting world, the Doñana episode has put an uncomfortable question on the table: managing wildlife requires practical decisions in addition to conservation principles. Hence the old alarm clock connected to a fishing line symbolized the effort to understand an animal that is difficult to observe. Today the tools are much more sophisticatedbut the challenge remains the same. The better we know the wild boar, the more evident it becomes that its extraordinary ability to thrive can become a problem when the mechanisms capable of maintaining balance with the rest of the ecosystem disappear. Image | PXHereRichard Bartz In Xataka | Neither drones nor snipers: wild boar hunters in Barcelona have a simpler natural and home remedy In Xataka | The technological war that we see in Ukraine has an unexpected replica in Barcelona: this time the enemy is thousands of wild boars

The cryptocurrency bubble is crashing again. The problem is that it is not at all clear that this time they will survive.

by

Cryptos are not raising their heads. In the last 11 months the value has fallen from those $124,000 in July 2025 to the $67,000 where it is moving today. This 46% drop has spread to the rest of a market that He has already cracked other times and then recover. It is not at all clear that this time he will succeed.. Crypto winter. yesterday bitcoin fell 7% in a single day and both its value and that of the rest of the cryptocurrencies have been in free fall for months. What differentiates this crash from previous ones is the breaking of a trend. Until not long ago, large and small investors seemed to see a great opportunity in cryptocurrencies, but we are facing a “crypto winter” in which the stampede of these digital assets is colossal. Record settlements. The apparent panic over that bubble burst seems to be behind a streak of massive withdrawals from investments in bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. On Bloomberg indicate that the current perception of bitcoin as a value asset in free fall has caused 1.5 billion dollars to be liquidated in just 24 hours. Even Strategy betrays itself. The company Strategy had become the staunch defender of bitcoin, but for the first time since 2022 it has sold bitcoins. The amount has been anecdotal, because they have sold 32 BTC (about 2.2 million dollars at current value) and they own 843,706 BTC in these moments. However, it is a sale with a lot of symbolism, because it betrays that HOLD spirit of crypto believers. Curiously, the analysts they fully trust in the future of Strategy, which they see reaching a value of $400 per share, 185% more than the current value. The failure of ETFs. It was assumed that the exchange traded funds with bitcoin as the main asset, they were going to result in stability and massive attraction of institutional capitalbut they are becoming a burden for investors, who have been withdrawing from their positions for 11 days: in less than two weeks 3.5 billion dollars have been liquidated, confirming that in the face of uncertainty, professional investors are the first to abandon ship. How was that safe haven value? for a long time bitcoin has been compared to gold in terms of its ability to become a refuge value in the face of potential crises. What is happening leaves that argument in a very bad place, although it is true that we have experienced other notable falls in bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in the past. Contagion effect. The collapse of bitcoin has spread to the rest of the cryptocurrency market. Ethereum, Solana and Dogecoin suffer combined losses of $1.6 billion, and once again it is confirmed that the interdependence of “altcoins” with bitcoin is too important. AI as savior. While cryptos bleed, Wall Street is experiencing a paradoxical sweet moment thanks to artificial intelligence. This technology is what is causing all the bullish momentum in the market, and we are seeing how the money that previously flowed into digital assets now rotates to tangible technologies (or at least that are being used). Loss of identity. Some experts they point out that bitcoin is losing precisely what made it different. It is behaving like an asset vulnerable to interest rates and global politics. It has stopped becoming an alternative and has become just another piece on a game board that is now rewarding those who have dedicated themselves to AI. It is paradoxical that bitcoin is being so punished when we have also been talking about the AI ​​bubble. In Xataka | Predicting bitcoin’s growth seems impossible: these charts prove it

Someone has created the website “is AI profitable anymore?” to answer the question of our time in real time

by

There is a website called “Is AI Profitable Yet?” whose sole mission is to answer one of the most important—and most uncomfortable—questions of today’s technology industry: does artificial intelligence make money anymore? The visual response It is absolutely forceful: The short answer is a priori a big NO, but be careful, because that answer is in a certain sense misleading. The graph effectively shows how the companies that are building frontier models are burning money like there’s no tomorrowand they all spend much more than they earn. The four that appear with long red bars (expenses) and very short green bars (income) are precisely the companies that are betting almost everything on the future of AI. Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft and Meta They have not stopped increasing their capex (capital expenditures) in recent years, and that logically means that their accounts are in the red. In fact, the announcements of these “hyperscalers” in their latest financial results have not only failed to soften that capex, but have driven it even further. The combined capex of these technology companies by 2026 is expected to amount to $725 billion, 25% of all world military spending. But the message of “everyone is losing money” is dangerous, because what all these companies are doing is investing in your future although when doing so they are running out of cash flow. There are two clear examples that can alert us. Companies are spending so much on AI infrastructure that they are running out of cash flow. It’s a dangerous bet. Source: Financial Times. The first is Amazon, which did not stop losing (investing) money for years and then became the giant it is today. The second, Uber, a company to which the same thing happened: it lost (invested) money for a decade, and although it does not have the size or success of Amazon, today it is an absolute world leader in its segment. That leaves us with a clear message: Not being profitable by investing in your future is not the same as not being clear about the economic model.. And all these companies are very clear about the economic model of AI: it is to invest today to earn (a lot) tomorrow. Nvidia is the big winner, but not the only one The great irony of AI is that for now the big business does not seem to be in AI, but in selling infrastructure to those who try to do business with it. It is the same thing that happened during the gold rush in the mid-19th century in California: Those who amassed stable fortunes were not the miners who searched for goldbut those who provided them with services and tools. There are several well-known examples: Levi Strauss saw the need of tough clothing, Samuel Brannan bought all the shovels, picks and pans he could in the area, and Henry Wells and William Fargo founded the famous postal and financial services company that allowed money and supplies to be sent safely to gold seekers. Nvidia is basically doing that: (making and) selling shovels. This has caused absolutely extraordinary growth in the stock market, and in the last three years it has become the most valuable company in the world and has not stopped breaking market capitalization records. Here it must be clarified that the estimates on that website are striking, but they do not mean that these companies are in any way bankrupt. Google/Alphabet continues to make billions of dollars every quarter, and the same goes for its rivals. All those red bars don’t mean that AI is smoke: just that we’re footing the bill for the experiment. One that could go wrong, of course, but one that could also go really, really right. The phrase that best sums up this “AI fever” is what Mark Zuckerberg said a few months ago: “We’re going to invest aggressively. Even if we lost a couple hundred billion dollars it would be a bummer, but it’s better than being left behind in the race for superintelligence.” Neither Zuckerberg nor his rivals seem upset about losing $200 billion right off the bat. They certainly do not seem to wrinkle despite the fact that at the moment there is a reality on the market: AI already works technically, but What it doesn’t do is function economically. for those who invest in frontier models. Here, however, there are a couple of notable notes. The first, the fact of Anthropic apparently expects to end the quarter making moneysomething unusual and promising. The second, that this website only shows Nvidia as the winner of this AI race, but that company is by no means the only one that has managed to make gold with this technological fever. The growth of stock market memory manufacturers is extraordinary. In just one year they have multiplied their market capitalizations by up to 11. Source: Reuters. In fact, we are seeing how a large number of technology companies have grown extraordinary in recent months thanks to the demand for hardware and components such as memories. Micron. SK Hynix and Samsung are the big beneficiaries of this situation, but they are not the only ones either. These days we have seen how PC manufacturers barely grow in income from those PCs, but they are doing it with the servers. There are more winners. There are photolithography equipment manufacturers such as ASML or Applied Materials, but also electrical, liquid cooling, networking, storage companies, and of course companies specialized in data center construction. This website answers the question in a very limited way, because the AI ​​segment is not only the one in which OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, xAI or Google operate. What is happening is simply that the big business of AI is currently not where everyone thinks. AI is being very profitable. The problem is that perhaps we are looking in the wrong place. In Xataka | The problem is not spending a lot of tokens, it’s that most of them are being wasted

Every time a megaship arrives at a port, the electrical grid collapses. The alternative already exists and does not need cables to the city

by

Ports around the world face an urgent and unavoidable mandate: decarbonize. The requirement is to turn off the huge diesel engines of commercial and cruise ships once they dock, connecting them to the local electrical grid. However, in practice, port cities have hit a concrete wall: there is not enough capacity in the land network to plug in these giants of the sea. Faced with this bottleneck, the engineering response has been to take the problem off the ground. A consortium backed by the United Kingdom and led by the firm ELIRE Maritime has been successfully validated what they define as “the world’s first floating, grid-independent hydrogen energy center.” The end of endless port works? To understand the impact of this development, you have to look at the current logistical ordeal. As emphasized Enlitinstall traditional shore power supply systems (known in the industry as shore power) is a real nightmare. The process can take between three and seven years, as it requires massive reinforcements of the network, improvements in substations, complex civil works and permitting deadlines that paralyze any progress. All this consuming land space that most ports lack. By placing the energy infrastructure directly in the water, this obstacle is overcome in one fell swoop. Furthermore, since ELIRE Maritime highlight a crucial financial advantage– The system avoids the risk of creating “stranded assets”. Unlike a concrete substation that cannot be moved if shipping routes change, this floating mega plant can be relocated as market demand dictates, giving port authorities complete independence from the network. Technological radiography. Far from being a mere concept on paper, the technology has just passed a rigorous six-month validation program. The physical design, echoed by all the media, consists of three interconnected hexagonal floating platforms that occupy about 1,200 square meters. But how does it supply power without collapsing? The system does not use huge generators to inject shock energy into the ship, but rather works on the premise of a “giant floating battery.” Through continuously operating 1.3 MW modular fuel cells (supported by up to 146 kW of onboard solar panels), the system slowly charges a massive 45 MWh battery bank throughout the week. When a ship docks, this battery releases energy quickly, delivering 5 MW of clean, continuous power without flinching. To fuel this process, the system consumes between 7,500 and 8,000 kilos of hydrogen per week. It has seven tanks on board integrated into low-pressure containers, which require refueling a couple of times a week. This allows ports to gradually adopt hydrogen without having to undertake extensive work to build pipelines or permanent storage facilities on land. The real impact. To ensure its real-world viability, the platform has undergone stability and wave testing in tanks at the University of Strathclyde, while industry giants such as Schneider Electric and Ricardo UK have successfully validated its entire complex electrical architecture. The environmental lights: According to the feasibility analyzes of the Ricardo consulting firm, the system can reduce emissions from docked ships by 77% compared to traditional diesel generation. In tangible figures, this represents a saving of about 47 tons of CO₂ per ship each week (almost 2,450 tons annually), in addition to completely eradicating emissions of toxic particles, nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur (SOx) that poison the air in coastal cities. The shadow of cost: Today, this solution is more expensive than plugging into the conventional network. The estimated energy cost of this hydrogen hub is between £0.25 and £0.50 per kWh, compared to £0.15 – £0.25 for the traditional ground system. However, the consortium argues that this initial extra cost is offset by the astonishing speed of deployment and they anticipate that standardization and the future drop in the price of hydrogen will equalize the trade balance. The potential is immense. The consortium estimates a global market of 62 TWh annually for grid-independent maritime solutions, with the potential to avoid the emission of 500,000 tons of CO₂ in the next decade. Next stops. As detailed ELIRE Maritimethe consortium is already in commercial talks to start the first real deployments in first-tier ports such as London, Singapore, Hamburg, Brisbane and Riga. The future of maritime decarbonization seems to have found a shortcut. It is not about inventing exotic technologies from scratch, but about integrating what we already know works (hydrogen, batteries and electrical power systems) in a much smarter way. If the mainland does not have enough electricity to power the giants of the oceans, the solution, ironically, has always been to go back into the sea. Image | ELIRE Maritime Xataka | The great challenge of drones was to transport loads for kilometers. A Chinese company has solved it with hydrogen

The US opened the door to Nvidia’s H200 chip in China. The Chinese army has been waiting for a long time on the other side

by

Jensen Huang, the CEO of Nvidia, has been forced to “fight” with the US Department of Commerce for months, but he has achieved what he wanted: your company can now deliver some of its Chinese clients its chip to artificial intelligence (AI) H200. As we explain to you On May 14, Alibaba, Tencent, ByteDance and JD.com are four of the ten Chinese companies that already have access to this powerful GPU. And they have it because the US Department of Commerce, which is the institution that grants or denies export licenses, has authorized at least ten Chinese companies and several distributors, including Lenovo and Foxconn, to acquire the second most powerful AI chip that Nvidia has. This decision has come almost two months after the US Government confirmed which was going to allow the company led by Jensen Huang to deliver its H200 chip to its Chinese customers. However, Nvidia likely won’t have time to savor this victory. Once again, dark clouds are gathering over it that threaten to compromise, once again, its business in China. And, according to Bloombergat least seven Chinese universities linked to the country’s armed forces and defense industry are trying to obtain H200 chips. This disclosure comes from China’s public procurement records, so it is presumably reliable. Remote rental: the avenue that the Department of Commerce still does not know how to close In the US there is a pressure group that opposes the sale of advanced American AI chips in China. Chris McGuire, senior fellow on China and emerging technologies at the Council on Foreign Relations, holds that “any deal that allows Nvidia to sell more chips to China means fewer Nvidia chips for US companies and a smaller US advantage over China in AI.” Besides, McGuire argues that “it is surprising that President Trump continues to allow himself to be convinced to put Nvidia’s interests before those of America.” Chinese entities increasingly resort to renting airtime on servers equipped with restricted Nvidia chips What is happening right now with Chinese universities is the ideal breeding ground to reinforce the theses of this pressure group in the US. Two of the institutions that have expressed interest in H200 chipsBeihang University and Northwest Polytechnic University, are among China’s “Seven Sons of National Defense”, a select group of universities dedicated to supporting the People’s Liberation Army. Both have been included in the blacklist of the US Department of Commerce for their involvement in the advancement of Chinese military capabilities. And public procurement records reveal that the Beihang School of Cyber ​​Science and Technology, which claims to have “national defense characteristics and aerospace advantages,” is attempting to rent the use of Nvidia chips. Northwestern Polytechnic University’s School of Cyberspace Security is also trying to rent access to H200 chips, according to those same records. Chinese entities are increasingly resorting to time of use rental on servers equipped with restricted Nvidia chips as a way to access prohibited hardware without having to import it directly. This is the strategy that the US Government will surely try to dismantle. What is not clear at the moment is how he is going to do it. Image | Nvidia More information | Bloomberg In Xataka | The US remains committed to stopping China. Now it has targeted the second largest Chinese chip manufacturer

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.