Amazon is negotiating to invest 50 billion in OpenAI. The money would go in through the door and out through the window.

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy is in talks with Sam Altman to close an investment of up to $50 billion in OpenAI. He has revealed it The Wall Street Journal and has confirmed it CNBC referring to his own sources. The deal could close in a matter of weeks as part of a record $100 billion funding round that would skyrocket OpenAI’s valuation to $830 billion. Today there are only fourteen listed companies in the world with a higher valuation. And none among the unlisted ones. Why is it important. Amazon would become the largest investor in the round, surpassing the 30 billion negotiated by another old acquaintance of technological mega-investments, SoftBank. And it does so just two months after OpenAI reached a valuation of half a billion dollars. Between the lines. Amazon has an important alliance with Anthropic from 2023that is, with the direct rival of OpenAI. AWS is its primary cloud provider, and in October inaugurated an 11 billion data center campus exclusively for Anthropic in Indiana. Betting at the same time on two companies that are so competitive with each other sounds like a paradox, but it is not so much if we think of Amazon as one of the sellers of picks and shovels in the AI ​​gold rush. They don’t care who finds the nuggets because they charge for the tools. The money trail. In addition to Amazon’s 50 billion, NVIDIA is negotiating to invest 20 billion and Microsoft “several billion more.” The three companies sell OpenAI just what it needs to exist: chips and computing capacity in data centers. Yes, but. This circular scheme is not going unnoticed and has raised more than one eyebrow: Amazon basically ensures itself many years of guaranteed income (at least as long as OpenAI does not go bankrupt, something no one can afford) while diversifying risks by also betting on Anthropic. Just in case. In detail. Although nothing has been leaked that could take it for granted, this investment could perfectly include clauses for OpenAI to adopt the AWS own chips. Or that Amazon sells ChatGPT Enterprise subscriptions to its enterprise customers. It will be through parallel business channels. OpenAI has insane costs with the dark clouds caused by the arrival of Gemini 3 and its great reception. So they are considering ways to sustain capital-devouring growth, such as the much-rumored IPO. The context. a few days ago, Amazon announced the layoff of 16,000 employees “office”, not warehouse or logistics. It is their second round of layoffs for them after 14,000 in October. In total, 30,000 casualties. Meanwhile, it has projected investments that already total 125 billion by 2026 in data centers alone. There is no other large technology company with such a high spending projection. It is a contradiction that has an overwhelming logic: if with AI you are going to be able to do more with fewer jobs, you choose to cut salaries to allocate them to investment. Go deeper. This movement is another nail in the… pattern: big technology companies no longer compete so much to develop the best AI but to control the infrastructure that supports it. Whoever has control of data centers and chips will have control of the business. Regardless of which chatbot succeeds. Featured image | Dima Solomin In Xataka | There was a time not too long ago when the future of supermarkets seemed like Amazon Go. Now Amazon Go is dead

Canada has opened the door to Chinese electric cars. The US warns: “they are going to regret it”

Canada has reopened the doors of electric vehicles from China, giving a radical turn to its trade policy. Last Friday, Prime Minister Mark Carney reduced tariffs by 100% to 6.1%, which could take the Canadian automobile market to a new horizon. Below these lines we tell you what this may imply. Change. The move comes a year after Canada impose massive tariffs to Chinese electric vehicles, following in the footsteps of the United States under the Biden administration. The argument, as describe from the BBC, was that they considered China to be carrying out ‘a policy of deliberate overproduction’. Now, with relations between Canada and the United States on somewhat delicate ground under the Trump administration, the Canadian government has chosen to diversify its trade alliances. “We take the world as it is, not as we would like it to be,” counted Carney. Quantities. The initial agreement allows the entry of up to 49,000 electric vehicles annually from China with the reduced tariff of 6.1%. This figure represents approximately 3% of the total Canadian market, which is around two million vehicles per year, according to account the Driving medium. According to the prime minister, the quota could increase to 70,000 vehicles within five years. Furthermore, the agreement stipulates that, in that period, more than 50% of these vehicles must be affordable models with an import price of less than 35,000 Canadian dollars (about 21,569 euros at the exchange rate). Date. Although there is no exact confirmed date, several media predict its arrival in the coming weeks. Addisu Lashitew, associate professor at the DeGroote School of Business at McMaster University, counted to the CBC that Chinese manufacturers have the capacity to accelerate production and ship quickly. BYD, the largest Chinese manufacturer of electric vehicles, even operates its own cargo ships, which could shorten shipping times even further. Brands that will arrive first. Curiously, the first brands to benefit from this opening will not necessarily be the purely Chinese ones. Tesla is in a prime position to take advantage of the deal immediately, according to they count from Reuters. Elon Musk’s company had already equipped its Shanghai plant in 2023 to manufacture a specific version of the Model Y destined for Canada, exporting more than 44,000 vehicles that year before the 100% tariffs came into effect. Other brands with a previous presence include Volvo and Polestar, both owned by the Chinese group Geely. For purely Chinese brands like BYD or Nio, the process will be somewhat slower, as they will have to establish dealer networks, service chains and spare parts markets from scratch. Disparate political reaction. The Premier of Saskatchewan (province of Canada), Scott Moe, celebrated the agreement as “very good news,” especially since China has committed to reducing tariffs on Canadian agricultural products such as rapeseed. However, Ontario Premier Doug Ford critical harshly criticized the move, calling Chinese electric vehicles “subsidized spy cars” and warning that the deal would “damage our economy and lead to job losses.” To put it in context, Ontario is the province where the Canadian automobile industry is concentrated. The US response. United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer qualified the agreement “problematic” and warned that Canada might regret it. However, President Trump declared that it was “a good thing” and that “if you can get a deal with China, you should do it.” The reflection of Japan. In 1981, Canada reached a similar agreement with Japan, allocating unit quotas instead of prices. The result was that Japanese manufacturers simply moved up the range: Civics became Accords, Corollas became Camrys. In two or three years, the average price of an imported Japanese car went from $8,000 to $14,000, as remember Greig Mordue, director of the Master of Engineering and Public Policy program at McMaster University, told Driving. However, that agreement also led to Honda and Toyota establishing production plants in Canada, today becoming the two largest vehicle manufacturers in the country. In fact, according to revealed A senior Canadian official told the CBC, the government wants to explore the idea of ​​​​creating joint ventures and investments with Chinese companies in the next three years to build a Canadian electric vehicle with Chinese know-how. More competition. Lashitew emphasize that the entry of cheaper Chinese vehicles will force other manufacturers to lower their prices, which would make electric vehicles more accessible to consumers and help Canada move toward its emissions reduction goals. “With electric vehicles still 30% to 50% more expensive than comparable gasoline cars, reducing trade barriers would significantly ease the affordability constraint,” he noted. Cover image | aboodi vesakaran and Xataka In Xataka | Cars are so absurdly expensive that FIAT already has a plan to solve it: limit them to 117km/h

Apple has found a way to win in the AI ​​era without having the best AI: be the door

Apple has just done something that was unthinkable until recently: publicly admit that you don’t have the best AI. That after fifteen years of trying to make Siri work, with the advantage of hitting first, he gives up. That the brains of Apple Intelligence, including the new Siri, Google will put it. And yet, it has just gained momentum to preserve its dominant position for the next decade. A technological paradox. This isn’t a move Apple should be very proud of, but it has a nicer side: in the age of AI, being the best may not be so important. What matters is being the door. For half a century, the value in technology has been in innovation. IBM, Microsoft, Google, Facebook… they were all winning by creating something that no one else had. The reading with this step by Apple is that that era may be over: if AI models are updated every quarter and the difference between the best and the second is indistinguishable for 95% of users, what sense does it make to spend 50,000 kilos on research to go behind? It sounds sexier, especially to investors, to be the one who charges a toll for each interaction. And for that you don’t need the best model, you need the device that people have in their pockets. That’s the bet: Siri will continue to work, being owned by Apple and running on Apple hardware, but the piece that changes is the intelligence, the LLM. The most expensive piece to develop and the one that possibly provides the least differentiation when you have a billion iPhones. Apple does not give up something that matters to it at all, but rather outsources the part in which it cannot compete. Bittersweet for the company, bitter for its devotees, reasonable for its investors. The real deal is not in what Apple pays, but in what it gets. Google pays 20 billion a year for being the default search engine in Safari, and now sells (or delivers, the terms of the agreement have not been made public) the Apple Intelligence feed. But Apple not only charges, it also receive data on how 1 billion users interact with AI in mobile context: You know what they’re asking. When. How they formulate queries. What do they reject? What do they repeat? Google gets better distribution, and Apple gets tremendously valuable training. If having the best AI is no longer a competitive advantage, what is? OpenAI has the best product. Anthropic has the best technology. Google has the best infrastructure. But Apple has the iPhone. And in a world where AI is gone commoditizingin which one model is valid until the next one arrives three months later, the only moat What holds is the device. There is not so much need to innovate if you control access. You just need what comes through your door to be good enough. AND Gemini is fantastic. Therein lies the problem. In the age of AI, whoever controls the device can live off income by letting others innovate. What incentive does Apple have to really improve AI? As long as Gemini works well on iPhones, Apple won’t care if there are models that are 12% better. Their business is collecting the toll, not pushing the border. Innovation still exists and Google / OpenAI / Anthropic / xAI will continue to compete, but Now it is made by companies that do not capture all of its value while it is exploited by those who do not create it.. Welcome to digital rentism. Where the one who controls the door decides how much those who pass through it should improve. AND “Sufficient” always beats “exceptional” when the decider does not pay for the difference. Apple did the rationally right thing. And that, precisely, should scare us. In Xataka | Alphabet has just overtaken Apple in the ranking of the most valuable companies in the world. The reason is in AI Featured image | Rubaitul Azad, Dennis Brendel

LEGO was one of the last refuges of analog play. You have just opened the door to sensors, lights and sound in your bricks

LEGO has flirted with electronics before, but its most stable promise was always something else: that the classic brick needed nothing to become anything. For decades, this principle maintained an almost intact refuge from the digitalization of children’s play, without screens or sensors, with imagination as the only driving force. That is why the step that the company has just taken is not minor. Introducing motion, light and sound detection into the brick itself strikes at the heart of the system. The announcement occurred at CES 2026, in Las Vegas, where LEGO officially presented its new SMART Play System. The company explained that it is a platform that introduces new electronic components into its construction system so that the creations react with lights and sounds in response to movement and interaction. It was not presented as a prototype, but as a product with a launch date and with a platform vocation. The system, by pieces. The SMART Play System is based on three elements that work together. The core is the so-called SMART Brick, a 2×4 brick that acts as a response center. Around it, the SMART Tags come into play, pieces that indicate to the brick what type of object or scenario it represents, and the SMART Minifigures, figures capable of activating different behaviors. LEGO insists that they are not independent accessories, but parts of the same system designed to fit with the rest of the traditional pieces. Sensors, lights and sound. Unlike previous approaches based on recognizable modules, here the electronics live within the brick itself. The SMART Brick integrates motion detection using an accelerometer, lights capable of reacting to the environment and a sound system that is activated according to physical interaction. There are no external screens or controls – it’s all down to how you turn, pan or tap the build. In its official description, LEGO also talks about a color recognition scanner and a game engine that generates reactions with lights and sounds. The CES demos show a birthday cake capable of recognizing when its candles go out and reacting with an audible celebration, as well as a helicopter that responds to movement with flight effects and changes behavior when turning or falling. In these cases, the interaction does not start from a button or a screen, but from a physical gesture. Release date. The commercial deployment of the system already has a first date set. The premiere will arrive in the United States in March, with a set based on Star Wars as the spearhead. The choice does not seem accidental: starting with such a recognizable license allows you to immediately show the possibilities of the system and see how it fits into real use before taking new steps. It’s not the first time. Although the SMART Play System introduces electronics to a place hitherto untouchable, LEGO has been exploring hybrid formulas for years. From robotics kits with sensors, like LEGO Mindstormsuntil augmented reality experiencesthe company has been testing how to combine physical construction and digital responses. The difference now is one of focus: the technology stops being a recognizable addition and becomes integrated into the language of the parts system itself. What some experts say. The announcement has not been received with unanimous enthusiasm. Josh Golin, CEO of Fairplay Group, warned the BBC that Smart Bricks “undermine what was once great about Legos” by shifting initiative from the child to the sensors. Along the same lines, Professor Andrew Manches, from the University of Edinburgh, recalled that the historical value of the brand has been in “the freedom to create, recreate and adapt simple blocks to create infinite stories.”, and warned that technology can condition how it is played if it is not designed carefully. Faced with these criticisms, LEGO defends that technology does not replace physical play, but rather expands it. Julia Goldin, head of product and marketing, explained to the British media that they do not see the digital world as a threat, but as an opportunity to “expand physical play and physical construction.” An important nuance. The SMART Play System does not mean that all LEGO sets will incorporate electronics from now on. For now, the company has presented a concrete proposal, with a first launch without announcing an immediate expansion to the rest of its catalog. What path this technology will have and in what lines it will end up appearing is something that is not yet defined. For now, this is a limited deployment that will serve to test how far this approach fits within the traditional game system. Images | LEGO In Xataka | What happened to Technicolor: evolution and death of the company that changed cinema and was overwhelmed by its ambition

Japan had dominated total car sales for more than 20 years, until China knocked on the door

Projections for 2025 anticipate a historic change in the global automobile industry. And as they point out data According to Nikkei China, Chinese manufacturers expect to reach approximately 27 million vehicles sold globally, surpassing the almost 25 million expected from Japanese brands. It is the first time in more than two decades that Japan has lost absolute leadership in total automobile sales. Why is it important. For more than 20 years, Japanese manufacturers have dominated global vehicle sales figures. Toyota, Honda, Nissan and company have become a global reference in sales volume and efficiency over all these years. That China is going to overtake them reflects the mammoth change that is happening in the automobile industry, with the Asian giant conquering every possible corner at a speed that is difficult for the rest of the competitors to digest. In detail. According to data from Nikkei China based on information from manufacturers and figures from S&P Global Mobility until November 2025, China’s growth in this sector will be 17% year-on-year. The figures include both passenger and commercial vehicles, and include both domestic sales and exports. The Chinese domestic market represents around 70% of these total sales, where new energy vehicles (pure electric and plug-in hybrids) already account for almost 60% of passenger cars sold. Brands such as BYD and Geely have entered the global top 10 manufacturers by sales this year, while Chery has consolidated as one of the largest exporters in the country. Exports support growth. The domestic market in China is a jungle. Overcapacity and increasingly fierce price competition They are making a dent in the country, which is why Chinese manufacturers have intensified their international expansion. In Southeast Asia, traditionally dominated by Japanese brands, Chinese sales will grow by 49% to reach around 500,000 units, according to data from the report. In Europe, despite the tariffs imposed Regarding electric vehicles, it is expected that there will be sales of about 2.3 million vehicles, benefiting from the fact that many plug-in hybrids are exempt from additional taxes. Emerging markets also joinand the figures indicate that Africa will register 230,000 vehicles sold (32% more) and Latin America will reach 540,000 units (33% more). A turning point. Japan reached its peak sales in 2018 with almost 30 million units. In just three years, the eight million vehicle lead it had over China in 2022 has completely evaporated. Japanese brands have lost market share in key Asian markets and are struggling to adapt to the electric transition, where they have arrived late. Toyota maintains its strength in segments such as pickups and is committed to carbon-neutral combustion engines (via renewable fuels) and hybrid technology, but in China, the largest market in the world and capital of the electric car, that approach is costing them dearly. Not even Honda, Nissan and Mitsubishi, which now they collaborate on software and electrical infrastructure, can withstand the storm coming from China, a country that has specialized above all in batteries, software and production speed. And now what. Japan has a great challenge ahead if it wants to recover ground in electrification and stop the erosion in markets where until recently they dominated strongly. China does not have a bed of roses either, since its challenge will be to maintain the pace in a context of growing protectionism, with the United States and Canada Tariffs of more than 100% already apply to Chinese electric companies, and those of the European Union of up to 45.3%. Things are going to be interesting. Cover image | BYD and Xiaomi In Xataka | Ferdinand Porsche devised the first car with an electric motor in each wheel. Today a Chinese manufacturer is going to make it possible

It is the back door through which China avoids US tariffs

The Bac Luan 2 Bridge is the border that connects China to Vietnam. According to one Nikkei Asia researchit is also the back door through which China is sneaking its goods to continue selling in the US without being affected by tariffs. what’s happening. Chinese trucks form huge queues at the border town of Mong Cai every morning; They bring merchandise that will end up arriving in the United States, but first all traces of ‘Made in China’ are erased and the certificates of origin are changed so that it continues its journey as Vietnamese merchandise. The trick allows them to continue selling products while avoiding the high tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, always according to Nikkei. Why is it important. It highlights that the trade war is full of cracks. We have seen other similar “tricks” such as dropshipping of chips and also Chinese companies that have gained access to banned NVIDIA chips via Indonesia. What on paper seem like insurmountable walls are not so insurmountable in practice; Chinese companies respond by redesigning new supply chains to keep prices low and continue selling in the US. Re-export. It is the strategy that many Chinese companies are adopting, some even offer it as a service to their clients. Nikkei has had access to a document from a Chinese company in which they literally say “re-exporting through a third country is effective in avoiding high tariffs.” Another company urges its customers not to include Chinese characters on the packaging nor of course any reference to ‘Made in China’. Volume. Of course the process of changing the country of origin is done clandestinely and China evidently does not recognize this practice, but the volume of containers that have passed through the border in Mong Cai continues to increase. As of July 2025, this volume was 840,000 tons, 43% more than the same period last year. At the same time, exports between Vietnam and the US are also increasing. In addition, Nikkei has analyzed satellite images and found that the Mong Cai border has changed a lot recently; It is filling up with logistics centers and urbanizations with a strong presence of Chinese businesses. White and in bottle. Washington raises his eyebrow. Trump reached an agreement with Vietnam, but warned that would raise tariffs to 40% if it is proven that they are acting as a platform to divert exports. Vietnam is trying to calm the waters by pursuing these fraudulent export practices and in July of this year alone they uncovered 900 cases. The question is how many more are still sneaking in and not just in Vietnam, routes are also being diverted through Malaysia, Indonesia and others. Image | Daniel Fikri in Unsplash In Xataka | China already has an army of 5.8 million engineers. His new plan involves accelerating doctorates

Huawei is not the only one seeking to challenge Nvidia. There are four other “little dragons” knocking on the door

“AI” may be one of the words of the year, but “funding round” is a concept that wouldn’t be far behind in the competition. The unicorn is a OpenAI that, if in 2024 it prepared for exceed 100 billion dollarstoday It is bigger than Coca-Cola or Samsung. He has achieved it thanks to money injected by third partiesand Chinese companies want to follow the same strategy as American companies with only one goal in mind: erase the United States from the equation. It’s the ‘Delete A’ plan. Biren. Talking about Chinese artificial intelligence is talking about deepseek and a few other models, but above all hardware companies like Huawei. Their GPUs are the ones that are helping for the Chinese AI field to flourish, and within those GPU companies is Shanghai Biren Technology. As we read in SCMPhas begun a financing round that seeks to raise more than 620 million dollars. Founded by Nvidia and Alibaba veterans, Biren has to his credit BR100one of China’s promises of raw performance to power the demanding data centers needed to train the artificial intelligence. And, unlike others that have opted for Chinese markets, Biren has chosen Hong Kong to attract international capital more easily. They are not the only ones in this race. Moore Threads. If Biren has Nvidia veterans on his team, Moore Threads is directly led by Zhang Jianzhongwho headed Nvidia in China. Perhaps, it is China’s most accurate response to Nvidia itself, and the reason is that it seeks replicate Jensen Huang’s business model combining 3D graphics, for a growing Chinese ecosystem of gamers, and GPUs for AI. To their credit they have the recent architecture Huaganga series that promises 50% more computing density compared to the company’s previous generation of chips, while being ten times more energy efficient. That efficiency is key to keeping AI operating costs at bay, something of vital importance for a China focusing on cheaper artificial intelligencebut functional as soon as possible. And saying that it is Nvidia’s great Chinese rival is not shooting with blank bullets. On the one hand, they are Huashan chips focused on massive clusters of up to 10,000 cards to train LLMs. On the other hand, the chips Lushan that feature hardware ray tracing for the video game market. New Moore Threads GPUs support major gaming APIs little dragons. When Moore Threads debuted on the Shanghai stock market earlier this month, Its shares skyrocketed 500% on the first day, demonstrating that the Chinese market wants to have “its Nvidia”. Biren and Moore Threads are two of the legs of the table. The other two are MetaX (formed by former members of AMD and focused on computing power) and Enflame (a company backed by Tencent and who develop AI systems in the Cloud for Tencent itself). Are known as the “four little dragons of AI” (although other startups are known the same), four of the most promising GPU startups in China that, together with Huawei that has taken giant steps with its AScend 910Dthey have only one objective. “Delete A“Delete the United States. In 2022, when it was still recent the veto of Huawei by the United States in it escalation of the trade war between the US and China, China’s State Assets Supervision and Administration Commission launched Document 79. It was an initiative to encourage the creation of technology that would turn its hardware companies into heavyweights in the global industry. However, there was something else. According to Wall Street Journalthis document has an unusual level of secrecy and an underlying idea: delete United States. Hence the ‘Delete A’ or ‘Delete America’. As? Making all state-owned companies operating in strategic sectors (such as finance, telecommunications, defense or energy) replace foreign software and hardware with domestic alternatives. When? Before of 2027. To do this, national options must be given, and hence the boost to Huawei and startups like these “little dragons.” Although it has also given headaches to companies that have not been able to access Nvidia chips such as Nvidia H20 because they must opt ​​for native solutions, less powerful or optimized in some aspects. Chinese sovereignty. And this development is not just a whim of China, but a necessity. Huawei, Enflame, Moore Threads and Biren, among many others, are on the Entity List of the US Department of Commerce. This prohibits trading with Western companies and access that foreign technology, although more recently the United States has loosened the rope, allowing Nvidia can sell its H200 chips to China… under certain conditions. It is a clear movement resulting from “if China is going to have the technology anyway, let’s take advantage while we can.” And it is because Huawei is working on a open alternative to Nvidia’s CUDA technologythe real ace up the company’s sleeve. Because it is no longer about technical muscle, but about the “language” that the AI ​​speaks. And when China manages to develop this “interpreter”, that is when they will have taken the real leap forward in the development of their tools and in the search for that sovereignty. Images | BirenMoore In Xataka | Big tech is starting to pawn grandma’s jewels for AI: it’s a worrying symptom

Telefónica leaves Wall Street through the back door. Goodbye to almost four decades in the largest market in the world

Telefónica has started the procedures to delist your shares from the New York Stock Exchangewhere it has been listed since 1987. The securities will stop trading on Wall Street in a matter of days once the documentation is filed with the SEC. The telecom will only maintain its listing in Madrid, in the Spanish continuous market. Why is it important. The movement closes a symbolic chapter that began when Telefónica became the first Spanish company to be listed on the largest market in the world. But the symbolism was left behind: today maintaining that presence involves high administrative costs and regulatory demands that no longer compensate. The trading volume in New York is residual and investor interest is practically non-existent. The context. Telefónica’s stock has fallen more than 90% in the last fifteen years. Its current valuation is on the floor, very far from that giant that in the nineties became the most valuable company in Spain. The dividend, which for years was the main attraction for conservative investors, has been successively cut, the last time this quarter. Buying in Madrid is more direct, cheaper and with the same liquidity as in New York, where securities are hardly traded. Between the lines. This decision fits into the strategic plan presented in November by Marc Murtra, focused on aggressively reducing costs. Telefónica has been lowering its blinds on all fronts: Sold subsidiaries throughout Latin America except Brazil. Reduced the dividend. Presented an ERE which is ending its negotiation phase. And now it is abandoning stock markets where being present no longer adds value. Also will stop trading in Lima. The figure. 4,554 departures are contemplated by the ERE that was agreed this Wednesday with the unions, 26% of the workforce in Spain. Cost savings are the obsession of the new management: 3 billion annually until 2030. Yes, but. Investors who have ADR certificates (American Depositary Receipts) will be able to exchange them for common shares in Spain or hold and trade them in US over-the-counter markets. Telefónica will provide both options, although it is evident that it prefers the first. The background. The exit from Wall Street is not an isolated or recent decision: The telecommunications sector has lost interest from investors, especially in Europe. It is a mature business, highly regulated, with tight margins and little ability to surprise. Telefónica today is a very different company from the one that debuted on Wall Street: smaller, more regional, more European. Its new strategy focuses on four markets (Spain, Germany, the United Kingdom and Brazil) and on consolidating itself as a reference operator with profitable scale, in addition to increasing its focus on technological solutions. Marking agenda. Wednesday’s day at the Distrito Telefónica offices north of Madrid was hectic. The contrast. When Telefónica went public in New York in 1987, it placed certificates worth $375 million, the largest influx of European capital on Wall Street up to that time. The telecom was then majority owned by the State and its debut was seen as a milestone of internationalization. Today it leaves unnoticed, recognizing that the regulatory burden and administrative costs of the SEC outweigh any benefits. Go deeper. The obligation to report detailed information to the SEC was useful at the time: thanks to it, data such as the price that STC or SEPI paid to enter the capital were known, information that the Spanish CNMV would never have required to reveal. But that level of transparency also has a cost, and Telefónica has decided that it is no longer worth paying for. In Xataka | The Government has had an idea so that the next blackout does not leave us without mobile data: let the operators pay Featured image | Telefónica, Lo Lo

James Webb has opened the door to a fascinating world

Until not so long ago, the word “exoplanet” seemed more typical of speculation than astronomy. Isaac Newton already dropped in the ‘Scholium Generale‘ of the Principia Mathematica that fixed stars could be the center of systems similar to ours, but science needed centuries to prove it. It was not until the late 1980s that the first signs of planets outside the Solar Systemalthough we had to wait until 1992 to confirm for the first time the existence of worlds beyond the Sun, around the pulsar PSR B1257+12. In recent decades, the pace of discoveries has skyrocketed thanks to increasingly precise instruments, which have allowed us to locate worlds that are as strange as they are fascinating. The Kepler space telescopefor example, identified more than a decade ago Kepler-16ba planet with “two suns” reminiscent of Tatooine from Star Wars. Since then we have cataloged a huge variety of exoplanets, but now the James Webb telescope presents an especially striking find: a world of boiling lava that, to the surprise of astronomers, is colder than theoretical models predict. An extreme world that questions what we know With a radius approximately 1.4 times that of Earth, TOI-561b It is an extreme super-Earth that orbits a star located about 280 light years away, in the constellation Sextans. NASA describes it as the innermost planet of a system made up of four worlds, with an immediate peculiarity: it completes an orbit in less than eleven hours. Its proximity is so extreme, barely 0.01 astronomical units, that the daytime hemisphere must greatly exceed the melting point of rocks. Everything points to a planet trapped by its star in a tidal lock, with eternal day on one side and perpetual night on the other. One of the peculiarities that most puzzles researchers is the low density of TOI-561 b. Astronomer Johanna Teske, lead author of the study, explains that “it is not a super-puff, but it is less dense than one would expect with a composition similar to that of the Earth.” The team envisioned the planet having a small iron core and a mantle made up of less compact minerals, a possibility that would fit the chemistry of its star. As it is a very old G-type star, about 10 billion years old and poor in iron, located in the thick disk of the Milky Way, it is plausible that the planet emerged in a primordial environment different from that of the Solar System. Still, the exotic composition did not resolve all the unknowns, and the team began to consider another possibility: that TOI-561 b was involved through a thick atmosphere. The idea is striking because the models indicate that small planets subjected to such intense irradiation for billions of years should have lost their gases long ago. NASA reminds us, however, that some worlds of this type show signs that they are not simple bare rocks. That nuance opened the door to thinking that the low density could be due, in part, to a volume inflated by a substantial layer of gases. To test the idea of ​​a dense atmosphere, the team turned to a technique that James Webb has used on other rocky worlds: measuring the disappearance of some of the infrared glow as the planet passes behind its star. Using the NIRSpec spectrograph, the researchers estimated the temperature of the illuminated hemisphere and compared it to what would be expected for a surface without heat-distributing gases. If TOI-561 b were a bare rock, its temperature would be around 2,700 ºC. However, observations placed that value close to 1,800°C, a difference too large to ignore. The unexpectedly low temperature makes sense if TOI-561 b is enveloped by a dense, volatile-filled atmosphere. In that case, the winds would transport heat from the illuminated hemisphere to less hot areas, which would reduce the infrared emission received by the telescope. Gases capable of absorbing part of the radiation before it escapes into space also come into play, something that coincides with the models evaluated by the team. YoIt is even possible that silicate clouds exist that reflect the light of the star and contribute to cooling the upper layers of the atmosphere. To explain how TOI-561 b maintains such a resilient atmosphere, the researchers propose a mechanism in which magma and gases are in constant exchange. Tim Lichtenberg points out that as the interior releases volatile compounds into the atmosphere, the ocean of molten rock recaptures some of them, reducing the loss to space. This process requires a planet exceptionally rich in volatile substances, very different from Earth in its initial composition. In Lichtenberg’s words, it would be “like a ball of wet lava,” a description that well sums up the extreme nature of the find. The observations that have allowed us to reconstruct this scenario are part of James Webb’s General Observers 3860 program. For more than 37 hours, the telescope continuously tracked the system as TOI-561 b completed nearly four full orbits, a record that offers a rare glimpse of how its brightness varies along the way. With that volume of data, the team is now analyzing how the temperature changes around the planet and what clues it provides about the composition of its atmosphere. This set of data, still being analyzed, points to a more complex world than was intuited in the first observations. The case of TOI-561 b shows that even the most extreme worlds can hold surprises. Far from just a scorched rock, Webb’s observations describe a dynamic system in which magma, atmosphere, and stellar radiation interact in ways we don’t yet fully understand. As Johanna Teske points out, “What’s really exciting is that this new data set It’s opening even more questions than it’s answering.“The research continues, and each new analysis seems to confirm that this planet belongs to a category that we are only beginning to know. Artistic images | POT In Xataka | We already know when the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS will be closest to Earth and what’s … Read more

They have closed a door on Luzia on WhatsApp, but her bet was already going the other way

The news was an expected splash of cold water: Meta will close general chatbot access to its WhatsApp business API starting January 15, 2026. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Poke or Luzia will be left out. Only Meta AI, the company’s own assistant, will remain. For Luzia, the Spanish chatbot that reached one million users faster than Instagram thanks to its viral function of transcribing WhatsApp audiosthe measure is a setback, they admit, but minor. “It is not the news that makes us most amused,” admits Álvaro Higes, CEO of the company. “It is not our main channel, but it is one of the secondary channels” where they find users who, due to having modest phones or data problems, depended on WhatsApp as a comfortable and convenient access point. Luzia already has more than 70 million downloads on its mobile applications, its main channel, and maintains “very healthy” organic growth on WhatsApp as well. The platform continues without charging its end users, financing itself with the 30 million euros raised in investment rounds. But that is changing. Contextual ads and in-chat purchases The startup has begun to monetize through contextual ads inserted into conversations“marking very clearly that it is an advertisement,” according to Higes. The logic they apply is that of commercial intent: “If you go to Amazon, you go looking for a specific product. But if you go to Leroy Merlin, you go with a problem and you come out with a product to solve it.” Luzia is in that whole part of the commercial funnel. Brazil is the laboratory. There they have launched a shopping tool integrated into the chat that allows you to browse and buy products from Amazon, Mercado Libre and other stores. When the AI ​​detects that it can recommend a product, it opens a catalog with which you can chat until the purchase is completed. This is where they want to move: pure transactionality. “Eventually we will also release a premium plan,” adds Higes. Better models, better generated images, without limits. But the CEO is skeptical about the paywall as a main model: “It is going to be very difficult to monetize via paywallthe differentiation between AI products is complicated,” he says in line with something we have commented on more than one occasion: the commoditization. Álvaro sees it more as a tool to close distribution agreements in bundle with other services, in the style of Perplexity with Telefónica just a year ago. The two routes are complementary: Contextual ads and transactions on the one hand. Distribution agreements by another. “It is still not a priority, we prefer to prioritize growth,” says Higes, “but it is something we have already started to do.” Forty people, more than half in engineering Luzia’s team is around forty people, distributed mainly between Spain and an emerging presence in Brazil. 60% work in engineering and product. The rest focuses mainly on branding, a department of five people that Higes considers essential: “Unless you are a super technical runner, people usually buy Nike because they think it’s pretty and because they know the brand. In AI it’s a bit similar,” he says as a simile. The analogy makes sense in a market where models are becoming trivialized. Higes invests a lot of effort in what they call the classifier, a system that identifies in real time the topic and the user’s intention to direct them to the most appropriate model. “If you say ‘hello’ to me, I’ll send you a very basic model. If you ask me about mathematics, I’ll send you a different model and give you different tools,” explains the CEO. That optimization is relevant because cost per user is a delicate balance. On the one hand, the price per token of a model equivalent to GPT-4 (more than suitable for the most basic queries) has fallen 90% in two years. On the other hand, the market has also been launching more expensive products that require more inference. “One force counteracts the other,” he summarizes. Higes recently wrote about this idea: There comes a time when the models are good enough for most use cases and there is no longer a need to always play with the most powerful one. “If someone says ‘hello’ to me, we are not going to use GPT-5 to answer ‘hello.’” Instead, the flows of e-commerce that they are building have a higher inference cost, but also direct monetization potential. AI for the 70% who “do not spend the day on a computer” The competition is evident: ChatGPT and Gemini They dominate the market. But Higes sees them as tangential rivals. “We make AI for the 70% of people who are not in front of a computer all day.” The bet is on presenting AI in a more accessible, more intuitive way. They have a specific tool for solving mathematics that generates four times more use than if the user had to ask the question in a blank chat. “We see that people solve more math if you are super clear and say: ‘I can help you solve math.’” It is the lesson they have learned by observing OpenAI data on how people use ChatGPT: Percentages by topic have barely changed from GPT-3.5 to GPT-5. “The level of use is still very limited,” says Higes. “There is a lot of work to present the product in the most intuitive way to the user and remove that cognitive load.” The biggest initial challenge was to change the mental model of users who arrived thinking that the AI ​​was Alexa or Siri. “They asked us the time and asked us to set timers. Many people said ‘this is rubbish, why doesn’t it tell me the time?’, when it can tell you many more things.” Presenting what AI can do is more relevant than the jump from GPT-5 to GPT-6. Maybe people don’t care about that as much as they care about having their problems solved. 2026: transactionality as focus The plan for next year is clear. … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.