While we debate how much electricity AI needs, China already has a data center that runs on clean energy

The first data center Artificial Intelligence Powered by China’s Wind Power. This is an innovative facility in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, in the northwestern part of the country, and has a renewable energy supply that allows it to operate using 100% clean electricity. This means everything a milestone for the Asian country and also for the global industry if we take into account the debate that sparks the enormous environmental impact of these infrastructures. Less emissions into the atmosphere. According to what the media shares South China Morning Postthe IA data center’s renewable energy plant generates 4.3 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity per year, reducing carbon emissions into the atmosphere by 3.65 million tons. Furthermore, the installation reaches a 1.15 in the energy use efficiency indicator (PUE), which measures the entire power of a facility and the energy expenditure of data centers. To put this in context, the industry’s average PUE has been 1.56 over the last 5 years, according to the Global Data Center Survey 2025 by Uptime Institute. A score of 1.0 would be a perfect PUE, according to this organization. Data in the East, Computing in the West. The implementation of this AI data center is part of a broader strategic plan that the Asian country is carrying out to reinforce the infrastructure that supports the development of AI using renewable energy. With the name in English Eastern Data, Western Computing (EDWC), this national megaproject seeks to move data processing from the more developed eastern areas of China to the rural western regions, which have much better and abundant environmental conditions for renewable energy sources. This would be the case of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. In this way, the Asian giant plans to face the increase in energy demand in the coming yearswhich may be double in 2030 according to some forecasts. Voracious consumption. The AI data centersdespite being very similar to traditional data centers, work with a greater processing demand, which makes them true energy guzzlers. The ICT consulting company Gartner predicts that the electricity consumption of this type of locations will reach 565 TWh this 2026. Regarding its impact, a recent study carried out by Allianz reveals that the emissions associated with this type of centers reached 286 megatons of carbon dioxide in 2025 and their carbon footprint has been 57% larger than what the IEA had originally calculated. Among the resources that have been used the most, electricity consumption is at the top, responsible for 76% of that footprint. For this reason, the report suggests that moving towards a greener AI will depend, above all, on transforming the energy systems that feed it and betting on renewable resources such as wind energywhich has hardly any water or carbon footprint. And here, what are we doing? The “green” outpost What China is taking is of enormous interest for the rest of the world, especially for our continent if we take into account the decarbonization objectives that come from Brussels. The European Union has already contemplated this type of data centers in some of its general energy regulations, such as the Energy Efficiency Directive (EU) 2023/1791which in its article 12 establishes that those centers with more than 500 kW will be obliged to make their energy consumption public. Other standards, such as Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1364seek to unify a regime of common assessment for the more than 3,000 installations of this type that exists in the EU. Although there is no shortage of those who see in this regulatory will a reason why Europe could be left behind In the technological race, the truth is that the energy efficiency of data centers, and especially in AI centers, can make a difference. That’s how he thinks Hongpeng LeiHead of the Mitigation Division of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), for whom betting on more sustainable centers is not an obstacle, but “the path to a resilient and competitive digital infrastructure”. Spain, for its part, is one of the European leaders in renewable energy with more than 55% of the electricity produced with this origin in 2025. This obvious advantage gives it a great potential to build a green-powered next-generation data infrastructure. However, it is worth asking whether the Spanish network will be able to keep pace with the installation of these centers and, consequently, satisfy what is clearly going to be a huge energy demand. For now, The project that Microsoft plans to build in Aragon will consume more energy than the entire autonomous communityan example of the energy challenge that accompanies the development of AI. Image | Paul Hanaoka Xataka | “Only behind the United States”: China has achieved a until recently chimerical position in intelligent computing

The San Diego Comic-Con Málaga 2026 wants to wipe the slate clean with a redesigned space and an avalanche of guests

The San Diego Comic-Con Malaga this year is determined not to repeat the organizational errors that hindered last year’s edition and that earned them criticism and complaints: little space to eat and drink, endless and poorly organized queues… Today we have seen it in one of the most important presentations to date about what awaits the event. Some data. It has begun to be highlighted that a physical expansion of the space has been carried out, designed to shorten the queues for access to the different activities. The total capacity this year will be 90,000 attendees, divided into 22,500 per day. They will be able to move in a space of 90,000 m² and enjoy more than 300 hours of programming. In this new presentation, 25 guests have been announced, adding to the more than 30 announced in spring. Fernando Piquergeneral director of SDCC Málaga 2026, also confirmed a considerable presence of Disney and its numerous franchises with a specific space in Hall M. Money. Those who already have their ticket purchased will receive a 20 euro gift redeemable at food trucksphotos and signatures with celebrities. Added to this is a portal and an official app, the Fan Portal, which will allow you to manage your profile, review the programming and reserve forums and signing sessions before setting foot on the premises, with identification by digital code. Piquer said that the goal is for the public to arrive “with everything prepared and organized” and be able to focus on enjoying themselves, without dedicating themselves to resolving logistical issues once there. Changes in infrastructure. A new auditorium will be built with capacity for 400 people, designed for interviews and small-format meetings that will operate in parallel to the main stage, Hall M. A covered and air-conditioned tent will also be installed that will accommodate the Exhibitor Hall Garden, intended for exhibitors, shops and collecting. Artist Alley will now have 90 stalls, while Meet The Artist will multiply its surface area by five: from four tents last year to twenty this year. The organization will also add new restaurant and rest areas to facilitate transit between pavilions. New guests. The guest line-up includes Karl Urban, star of ‘The Boys’ and ‘Dredd’. The presence of the entire cast of ‘Starship Troopers’ has also been announced, Christopher Lambert (‘The Immortals’), Kevin Sussman (‘Big Bang Theory’), Deborah Ann Woll (‘Daredevil’), Dave Jones (co-creator of ‘Lemmings’ and ‘GTA’), Jeremy Crawford (designer of ‘Dungeons & Dragons’), Shinichirō Watanabe (creator of ‘Cowboy Bebop’ and ‘Samurai Champloo’), Yoshihiro Ueda (director of ‘Dragon Ball’), Akira Yamaoka (composer of ‘Silent Hill’) and comic artists such as Carmen Carnero, David Messina, Chris Condon, Pepe Larraz, Álvaro Martínez Bueno and Michael Walsh. The posters. Illustrator Helen Chen, known for her work as art director and production designer on ‘The K-Pop Warriors’ and ‘Raya and the Last Dragon’, signs the first official poster of the festival, with Malaga as the visual protagonist. There will be a second poster, still without a scheduled date, by Jon Romita Jr., one of the key figures in superhero comics. In addition, attendees with tickets already purchased will be able to pick up an exclusive poster by the artist Jorge Jiménez at the venue. In Xataka | Masters of sewing (and 3D modeling): Cosplay comes of age and becomes mainstream

Europe has a robot ready to clean the seabed. Spain has 8,000 kilometers of coast waiting

Neither the proliferation of jellyfish neither lack of sand On the beaches, the great environmental problem of the oceans is marine litter. So within the European project SEACLEAR 2.0, a research team from the Technical University of Munich has developed an autonomous diving robot capable of detecting and recovering debris from the bottom. A kind of pool cleaning robot that plays in another league: the open sea. But is there really so much shit in the sea? An example: In Dubrovnik they counted more than a thousand pieces of garbage in an area of ​​only 100 square meters. In the Mediterranean, where there is tourism and ports, it is a real problem. The pool cleaning robot. The system is made up of the robot and a series of auxiliary elements necessary to fulfill the mission: an unmanned mother ship, an auxiliary boat, a drone, an explorer robot of about 50 centimeters and the robot in question. How does it work? The boat is what provides energy and data to the robots and is also responsible for mapping the bottom with camera and sonar, which allows objects to be identified even in murky waters. Afterwards, the small, agile scout robot quickly runs through it. With all this information, the pool cleaning robot descends with its eight miniturbines until it reaches that area where there is garbage. There, he picks up the objects and lifts them onto the auxiliary boat, which works as a container, using a winch. Why is it important. Because it reaches where divers cannot or does not allow them to reach: as explains dr. Stefan Sosnowskifrom the Information Technology Control Chair of the TUM, a cost-benefit analysis proves that this autonomous waste collection is profitable from 16 meters deep. That’s where human diving becomes more expensive, time-consuming and dangerous. That is to say, this robot does not replace diving, but rather complements it to offer a global cleaning solution. On the other hand, the system is not limited to extraction: it also constitutes a valuable tool for obtaining data since, thanks to the integrated sensors, it can generate maps of the bottom, identify types of waste and record its location, which can be useful in different fields, such as designing better environmental or port management policies. Context. He SEACLEAR project It is funded by the European Union through the Horizon 2020 program. The consortium is made up of eight European partners: the universities of Munich, Delft, Cluj-Napoca and Dubrovnik on the academic level, plus the Port Authority of Hamburg, the Dubrovnik-Neretva Regional Development Agency and the company Subsea Tech. That the port of Hamburg and a company are part of the group is important: it is not an academic laboratory project, but the idea is to put it into practice, to real use at sea. In detail. The intelligence of the system resides in four components: the identification of objects with camera and sonar, the manual labeling of more than 7,000 images of objects outside the seabed, the generation of 3D models through AI. From here, the system already knows where and how to grab those objects to extract them safely. The key to this extraction is a four-finger clamp capable of applying up to 4,000 N of force, enough to lift objects weighing up to 250 kilograms. However, how much with pressure sensors to regulate that force so as not to break fragile materials such as plastics or glass. If you broke a plastic object into smaller pieces, the cure would be worse than the disease. Yes, but. The first public demonstration of the system occurred in the port of Marseille, where the robot recovered, among other things, a wheel and a car seat. While it is true that it is a test in a real environment, it is a controlled demo under known conditions. The project has not yet made public data essential for its profitability and scalability, such as how many objects were recovered per hour, what is the error rate of the recognition system or the cost of operating the system in a real port for a year. On the other hand, extracting objects from the bottom has its drawback: if they are large and have been deposited there for years, they can suspend contaminated sediments and disturb fauna that has colonized them. That is, paradoxically, cleaning can also have environmental impact. In Xataka | It turns out that China’s new giant buoys are actually miniature data centers. Korea won’t like it In Xataka | Germany is installing giant concrete spheres under the sea. It has a good reason: to store renewable energy Cover | TUM

Would you let them clean your house for free in exchange for filming it from top to bottom? This startup thinks you’ll say yes

Your floor like the jets of gold down your face. In principle, this is how good the proposal sounds. shifta service launched in New York that offers comprehensive home cleaning services. Is it perhaps an NGO? Well no, the company does not charge in currency: an operator enters your house to the kitchen (literally) wearing a recording device that allows him to record his movements on video during the entire cleaning session. That video is then converted into training data for robotics and AI. In other words, the user does not pay with money, they pay with data. This exchange is not new by any means, but the saying “if something is free it is because the product is you” has gone from the screens to the most intimate part: your home. Clean your house and pay with your privacy. The mechanism is direct: a service in exchange for data. According to says Harry KilbergShift’s US CEO on his X/Twitter profile, upon your request, the company sends a “verified” operator to clean up and leave. In exchange, it records the cleaning so that robotics companies have access to those movements and, through training, their units can replicate it. In other words, there is a camera monitoring the movements of the operator and in the background, your dirt, the rooms of your house and each and every one of your things that are visible and can be cleaned. The Service FAQ They detail that the recordings are anonymized before being processed and that they blur any information that could identify you. But of course, “anonymized” is not the same as private: There is research that shows that anonymized data is not so anonymized: it can be re-identified quite often when crossed with other sources. And in a house it is even easier: the distribution of space, objects and your routines They make up a unique image of you, your tastes and your habits.. Anonymizing the video does not eliminate that trace, it only hides it in plain sight. How does it work? shift Why is it important. Because the home has historically been the last stronghold of privacy. You may post photos of yourself having brunch on a terrace in Malasaña, but you might think twice before sharing your breakfast muffin in a cup of Mr. Wonderful with a cosque while wearing a threadbare robe with cheese stains from last night’s pizza. It is true that the fever of connected devices and wearables had reduced that redoubt, but Shift goes one step further: it is an active recording of the interior of private homes made by an outsider and that is expressly dedicated to a market. The company accumulates a huge amount of information about you: how you live, what you have, how you behave in private. In return, you have a vague idea of ​​what he does with your data and you don’t know who he sells it to or how he uses it. It is, in short, an imbalance of information from which there is no turning back. On the other hand and as Shift explains, home cleaning and its automation towards an eventual service carried out by robots is just the beginning: there will be an expansion towards home maintenance, repairs and errands. If the model scales, the volume of private indoor data that would be generated would be enormous, an asset as valuable as it is sensitive. Context. The closest examples of the digital attention economy are well known: Google and Facebook have built their respective empires by offering free services in exchange for behavioral data, only Shift takes it to the physical world, one step further, more intimate and more complex to revoke. Its business model is part of the trend of training robots by knowing how humans move and how we perform in real spaces, something that companies such as Figure AI either Physical Intelligence (Pi) because in reality, we are living in a race to obtain this information. How they do it. Its operation consists of three steps: verifying the operators, recording during service and anonymization before processing. The Shift project begins in New York and on its website it announces its presence in 15 countries (although it seems that it is more of a promise of deployment than a reality). Its beginnings are common in these times of social networks and virality: respond to the publication with “Shift” to receive early access and gain visibility. Of course, what is not publicly explained is the technical architecture behind data anonymization, which third parties receive the data, the security standards applied to the devices carried by the operators or the audit mechanisms (if they use them). Yes, but. In fact, as explained it would not meet the standards of the GDPR European (article 5 refers to the fact that any processing of personal data must be transparent, limited and justified). One of Shift’s slogans is: “You get a spotless apartment. We get training data. Everyone wins.” One thing must be given to the startup: it is honest from the beginning when it comes to making it clear that the recorded data is going to be commercialized. How many conditions of use of applications that we use daily are less clear when it comes to talking about the destination of the data. Of course, informed consent is weak precisely because of the opaqueness behind it and because of an obvious reality: a recording of your home is not a tweet and the consequences of sharing it are much more serious. In Xataka | Have I been Trained: how to know if your data and work has been used to train an artificial intelligence In Xataka | AI has become the best example that if you don’t pay for the product, you are the product Cover | shift with Gemini

clean Windows of so much garbage

Over the last few years, Microsoft has flooded Windows 11 of AI-based functions. Many of these tools have not gone down well with the community, not to mention the invasive advertising that has surrounded the operating system all this time. The result of this strategy without clear direction has led to fed up users, a damaged reputation and a nickname that has gone viral: “Microslop”. Now the company wants to regain the trust of users, and its own CEO has had to come out and say so in public. The problem has its own name, and it is “Microslop”. In recent months, Microsoft’s obsession with integrating AI into absolutely everything (Windows, Edge, Bing, Notepad, the Start menu) has generated great rejection from users. On social networks there are already many who nickname the company “Microslop”, a play on words between Microsoft and the term AI slop (content of dubious quality generated with artificial intelligence). The company tried to delete the term blocking it on their official Copilot Discord server, which sparked even more controversy and ended up forcing them to close that server directly. As we mentioned a couple of months ago, the maneuver was a perfect example of how to aggravate a problem instead of solving it. Recall: the straw that broke the camel’s back. Microsoft’s flagship feature for Windows, which promised a kind of AI-based PC photo memory, became the symbol of everything that was going wrong: an intrusive feature, with serious privacy implicationslaunched without anyone asking for it. She wasn’t the only one. Notepad, one of the simplest and most beloved Windows tools, also received AI functions that many users considered nonsense. The community responded, among other things, creating third party applications to eliminate all that unwanted content in one fell swoop. And in fact, if you want to eliminate everything you don’t like about Windows 11 suddenly, there is a tool that we have recommended in this house more than once: Win11Debloat. Pavan Davuluri was the first to admit it. In March of this year, the head of the Windows division published a text on the official blog of Windows acknowledging the existence of “pain points” regarding the AI ​​functions integrated into the operating system, and committing that the company will only integrate artificial intelligence where it is “truly meaningful.” He also promised an overhaul of the Feedback Hub, the tool for users to submit suggestions, to make it easier for complaints to better reach internal teams. what he said Satya Nadella. During Microsoft’s fiscal third quarter earnings call, the company’s CEO stated that Microsoft is carrying out “the critical work needed to win back fans and strengthen engagement” with Windows, Xbox (which also has its own now), Bing and Edge, and that in the short term the priority is “quality and better serving core users.” Nadella cited improvements such as better performance on devices with low RAM and a faster Windows update experience. The situation is quite serious in itself, and the fact that Microsoft’s own CEO has come to the fore to calm the waters in this way is an indication of this. Inside, the project is called Windows K2. According to they count From Windows Central, there is an internal initiative underway under that name whose objective is to undertake profound improvements in performance, reliability and user experience. It will not come as a big update with its own name, but as continuous and gradual improvements. The File Explorer, one of the elements most criticized for its slowness, is one of the priorities. So are the taskbar and greater control over widgets and the news feed, two of the most controversial additions to Windows 11. There are reasons for optimismeither and for skepticism. as well they point From TechRadar, it is striking that Nadella mentions Bing and Edge in the same breath as Windows when he talks about recovering ordinary users, since they are precisely the two tools that Microsoft has been trying to sneak into the operating system for years without anyone demanding them. On the other hand, the promise to reduce advertising and banners within Windows, something that Davuluri also included in his March commitment, will be the real test of cotton. And now, let’s see if there are facts. Microsoft has 1.6 billion active Windows devices per month, a figure that Nadella took the opportunity to remember at the same conference. That means that no matter how much Linux or macOS gain ground in the public debate, Windows remains the dominant operating system on the desktop. But that position of strength does not guarantee fidelity. The company knows this, and that is why this discourse towards quality and user feedback is more about necessity than strategy. We will have to wait to find out if the company is serious about it. Cover image | Microsoft and Wikimedia Commons In Xataka | The MacBook Neo is the biggest existential threat to the Windows laptop market. And the manufacturers have no answer

Letterboxd was one of the last “clean” and community-focused platforms. Now the fear is that it will end

Letterboxd has been the exception that proves the rule in the wild landscape of social networks for years: it is one that grows without sacrificing your communitywithout optimizing screen time by trampling on the quality of its users’ experience, without searching for viral content at all costs. Now, the Canadian company that controls 60% of the platform is looking for a buyer, and a question arises that has very short legs, because we already fear the little things that are coming. Where does it come from? Letterboxd was born in 2011 in Auckland, New Zealand, by Matthew Buchanan and Karl von Randow. It functioned as a digital diary where movie fans could record what they saw, rate it, and share it with whoever they wanted. Without feeds algorithmic (there is not much doomscroll on Letterboxd), no viral content from strangers, no (too much) intrusive advertising. Just movies, opinions and the formation of a community relieved to be able to leave the suffocating world of trendsthe hashtags and the influencers. The growth. For almost a decade it was a niche tool, but with the pandemic, Letterboxd grew from 1.8 million users in 2020 to 17 million in 2024. Nearly 100 million reviews were written that year. In 2026 it has reached 26 million members. All of that growth has occurred without the main feed ceasing to be chronological, more akin to a classic 2006 incarnation of Facebook than any current social network. She soon became known in the industry. A24 explicitly cited Letterboxd when talking about the strong theatrical debut ‘The brutalist‘ and directors like Michael Mann, Rian Johnson or Francis Ford Coppola they ended up using the platform as a genuine space to talk about your film-loving tastes. Tiny arrives. In September 2023, the Canadian Tiny (investor that owns very different brands, such as the AeroPress coffee machine manufacturer) acquired 60% of Letterboxd for between 50 and 60 million dollars. The founders retained a minority stake and continued at the helm, and users were promised independence and respect for what had made the platform grow, something that was broadly fulfilled. Some more advertising appeared, a movie rental service that was difficult to access and little else. Tiny leaves. Now, Tiny wants to go out. The company has contacted with possible buyers: Versant, parent company of CNBC and MS NOW, and The Ankler, a specialized media with which it already attempted an operation in 2025 that did not prosper. The reason is that Tiny’s shares have fallen since the acquisition of Letterboxd. Additionally, the platform was purchased through its venture capital fund. sign that Tiny always planned for a quick change of hands. The Goodreads precedent. It’s a similar case in terms of community, function, and size: Goodreads is the literary equivalent of Letterboxd, and ended up being acquired by Amazon in 2013, while also promising not to botch the platform’s user experience. Today we know that Amazon uses it to collect user data and it is true that it has barely touched it. But that has its negative impact: the design is practically unusable today, moderation does not exist and users are beginning to migrate to alternatives like The StoryGraph. The fear of shit. At this point we already know perfectly well what the term refers to, which has an almost academic status: the enshittificationcoined by Cory Doctorow, happens when platforms start by offering a good user experience to attract users, then they exploit them to attract clients with money to invest in the business and finally they also exploit those clients to maximize short-term profits. Letterboxd has lived outside that cycle longer than its rivals have. But each threat of a new owner sets off alarm bells again. Inframonetization. Letterboxd is clearly undermonetized compared to its competitors. Your generous level Free allows you to use the platform with almost the same features as the paid option and advertising remains surprisingly limited, without invading everyday use, as happens on X or Instagram. And they try things: interviews with actors and directors about their favorite films, rental service for little-known films, in-person events… all on a very small scale, almost more as a way of spreading the brand in small spaces than as an open form of monetization. That is, there is growth potential, and that is what might interest a buyer. That is precisely what generates concern among its community: activating these options too aggressively can destroy the value of genuine cinephilia that resides behind them. Letterboxd users are very active and sensitive, and we must not forget cases like Mubi, whose user base canceled subscriptions en masse after learning of the links of one of its investors with the Gaza war. Right to veto. There is a safety button that can prevent a company with interests other than its subscribers from coming to buy Letterboxd: Buchanan retains veto rights over any potential buyer, a condition that exists openly to preserve the original spirit of the platform. Its effective scope, of course, will depend on how much the original owner is willing to exercise it and what price that veto has in the final negotiation. In Xataka | “Caution: non-vegetarian content”: when disclaimers warn about absolutely everything

Belgrade’s “liquid trees” are the fascinating biotechnological solution to clean the air in cities

Today, the city of Belgrade has a significant problem in terms of air quality, which is already something quite typical of large cities. The situation here, the truth is, is quite critical, with some areas where the limits recommended by the WHO are exceeded by up to 5 times, and to solve it, the idea that we can have in mind is need to plant more treesbut the reality is that there is little space available to plant them, so they have had to choose to install what they have called liquid trees. The solution. Under the name of LIQUID 3this project has been operating since 2021 in front of the Stari Grad City Hall in the Serbian capital, and to the surprise of many it is not shaped like a tree, but is a simple glass tank that is filled with 600 liters of water inhabited by local microalgae. But just because it doesn’t have the shape of a tree doesn’t mean it doesn’t work as such, since it literally uses photosynthesis to absorb carbon dioxide from the environment and release pure oxygen into the environment, and the truth is that they are very efficient, since a single tank of LIQUID3 is equivalent to the absorption capacity of two 10-year-old trees or 200 square meters of grass. How is it possible? That a simple tank surpasses an adult tree when it comes to ‘purifying’ the air, the truth is that it seems strange, but biotechnology has achieved something incredible. Specifically, science has seen how microalgae have the ability to capture carbon dioxide and fix it between 10 and 50 times faster than land plants under controlled conditions. In fact, studies indicate that these algae can fix approximately 1.8 grams of CO₂ for every gram of biomass generated, achieving CO₂ removal efficiencies close to 50%. And designed for the city. Being in the center of a city is not easy, and that is why scientists have had to use strains of Serbian freshwater microalgae that grow with simple tap water and withstand extreme temperature fluctuations. And here the research indicates that these species are ready for the most hostile environments. And another positive point they have is that they hardly require maintenance, since it is limited to the fact that the biomass generated must be extracted every month and a half, and in addition, water and fresh minerals are added. The positive here is also that biomass can be used as a great natural fertilizer. More than a lung. The LIQUID3 is not just a laboratory experiment that has taken to the streets, but has been designed as multifunctional urban furniture, since, in addition to purifying the air, the structure functions as a bench to sit on and even adds solar panels to charge your cell phone or provide night lighting. It is not definitive. Although it seems incredible, the truth is that we must put our feet on the ground in the face of technological enthusiasm. Although right now the figures are very good, there is still a lack of studies that can validate the impact it has in the long term and measure whether they are really giving good results, and above all that they are real. But the most important nuance here is that these systems do not replace traditional trees or forests, which logically must remain where they are and promoting their implementation. In this way, we are left with the fact that this technology has been designed for dense and highly polluted urban areas where traditional planting is logistically impossible. Where the asphalt does not give an inch to the roots, the liquid trees rise like a high-tech green oasis, giving the city’s lungs a break. Images | LIQUID3 In Xataka | Tell me where you live and I’ll tell you how healthy your tap water is: the map of Spain that analyzes each municipality

The Italian far-right was looking for a way to clean up its image. He found the formula in ‘The Lord of the Rings’

In November 2023, Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni opened an exhibition on JRR Tolkien at the National Gallery of Modern Art in Rome, organized by her Ministry of Culture. Nothing unusual, except that Meloni has been understanding ‘the lord of the rings‘ as a “sacred text.” This is how the legendary British fantasy trilogy ended up becoming a political catechism for the Italian extreme right. We started badly. The first Italian edition of ‘The Lord of the Rings’ was published in 1970, with a prologue signed by the philosopher Elémire Zolla, who interpreted the work as an allegory of “pure” communities threatened by foreign invaders. For the youth of Italian Social Movement (the MSI, a party founded in 1946 by veterans of Mussolini’s fascism) that reading was an enlightenment. As he noted in his 1975 review of the book far-right youth leader Marco Tarchi, the work was perfect for the young right precisely because it did not carry the weight of fascist history. Relocation sought. The MSI had been trying for years to reframe its identity in a country where the left dominated culturally, with the old fascism logically stigmatized. They needed something new to renew the symbols. He imagined universe by Tolkien gave them the opportunity to articulate a political identity around values ​​of virtue and anti-modernity, values ​​that Julius Evola, the ultra-nationalist mystical philosopher who advocated a racial hierarchy of pagan and aristocratic lineage, had already been preaching for decades. Fascist Woodstock. In 1977, leaders of MSI (and, above all, its youth faction) organized what would be known as Hobbit Camps. The first was held for two days in southern Italy and brought together young people from all over the country. On the surface, the event had the look of a folk music festival: stages with performances, tents, booths with books and T-shirts. Of course, a dozen muscular boys maintained order, and they were distinguished by wearing bracelets with a Celtic cross. Calling them Hobbit Camp, they wanted to attendees will identify with these small beings: conservative, rooted in tradition, reticent to change and foreigners… The group did not hide its affiliation: flags with Celtic crosses flew in perfect harmony with the Tolkienian aesthetic, the band Compagnia dell’Anello (that is, “Fellowship of the Ring”) played songs about the good old European identity. His anthem, in fact, was ‘Il domani appartiene a noi’ (“Tomorrow belongs to us”), whose title was a deliberate replica of the shocking song of the Hitler Youth in ‘Cabaret‘, titled ‘Tomorrow belongs to me’. A women’s magazine called ‘Éowyn’ was also launched, in honor of the princess of Rohan. These camps They stopped being celebrated in 1981when they had fulfilled their function as spaces of recruitment and indoctrination, hidden under a layer of celebration of popular culture. Meloni the cosplayer. Meloni was four years old in 1981. But a decade later he attended the revival of these camps: Hobbit 93, held in Rome, where he sang with the band Compagnia dell’Anello. He had come to Tolkien at age 11 and joined the MSI youth team shortly after. As a youth activist, Meloni and his group of militants gave themselves Tolkienian nicknames, visited high schools in disguise to catch the kids, and met at the “blowing of Boromir’s horn” to hold thematic talks on political recruitment. In her autobiography ‘Io sono Giorgia‘, published in 2021, Meloni described Sam as his favorite hobbit: neither strong, nor fast, nor majestic, an ordinary hobbit but without whose help Frodo would never have completed his mission. A metaphor for the transformative power of ordinary people. sacred text. The admiration has not diminished over the years. Meloni has said that he considers ‘The Lord of the Rings’ not a fantasy, but a sacred text. In an interview with ‘The New York Times’ in 2022 he declared that “Tolkien can explain better than we can what conservatives believe.” On the night of the general election he won, his sister Arianna posted a celebratory letter on Facebook full of Tolkien references. And at the final campaign rally, the actor Pino Insegno, the Italian voice of Aragorn, introduced her to the public by reproducing the character’s speech in front of the Gates of Mordor. It is not the only fantastic reference that Meloni handles: the political festival that the leader founded, which attracts figures like Elon Musk or Viktor Orbán and which has been defined as the largest event of the European conservative current, is called Atrejuin honor of the hero of ‘The Neverending Story’. Tolkien Expo. In November 2023, Meloni inaugurated the exhibition ‘Tolkien: man, teacher, author’ in Rome, organized by his Ministry of Culture to commemorate the fifty years since the writer’s death. Criticism was abundant: several analysts pointed out the conflict of interest of a government with post-fascist roots dedicating public resources to praising the book that had served as a catechism for its predecessors. Some nuances. Not all analysts see Tolkien’s importance in the foundations of the new Italian extreme right as so central, even though Meloni does show herself to be a strong devotee of the text. The political scientist Piero Ignazi pointed outfor example, that the Hobbit Camps were organized by a minority faction of the MSI, and that the focus on hobbits and elves is part of Meloni’s personal communication strategy: the image of a woman less aggressive than other far-right leaders, with accessible cultural references. But is Tolkien a fascist? As for whether The Lord of the Rings is right-wing, just remember that Tolkien wrote the trilogy during the rise of Nazism and fascism and refused to publish ‘The Hobbit’ in German when They asked him to prove Aryan descent. Possibly he would have been repelled by the idea of ​​hobbits being read as opposed to change and devoted to preserving traditions. Even so, his work continues to serve as a basis for dubious movements: as he analyzed Arc Magazine In 2025, sectors of the technological right of Silicon Valley, aligned with the MAGA wing, … Read more

We were going to turn trash into clean energy. Now the biogas sector faces its biggest challenge: convincing neighbors

Spain may be emerging as great power in solar and wind energybut there are other green energies that choke him. The Spanish state is not having a nose for biogas. Or rather: it doesn’t smell good, in the most literal sense of the word. However, the sector has practically gone from zero to one hundred in record time: in just two years there are more than 200 biogas projects on the table in different processing phases. And they bring with them a problem: biogas is the green energy that no one wants close to home. The problem: energy transition vs. social rejection. In the roadmap for Spain’s energy transition (the PNIEC 2030), whose ultimate goal is for the state to achieve emissions neutrality by 2050, biogas has its role. But to make it possible, it is an essential requirement to build and launch plants. And here it collides with a wall of social rejection in the form of citizen platforms, not so much to the technology itself, but to the implementation model. There are no shortage of reasons: from the classic fear of bad smell to the lack of territorial planning, promoter companies that present projects without setting foot on the territory and talking to those who live there, the gigantism of some facilities or the shadow of macro farms as arguments, such as They explain for El País the emeritus professor of Environmental Engineering at the Polytechnic University of Catalonia Xavier Flotats and the biologist and researcher at the National Museum of Natural Sciences Fernando Valladares. Why is it important. That biogas appears in Spain’s energy transition strategy implies that, sooner or later, it will materialize; the key now is in the as. It is also a direct path to energy sovereignty that replaces natural gas. Just take a look at the electricity price map in Europe To understand it: countries that depend on imported fossil fuels suffer from price volatility, while those who have opted for their own alternatives They achieve greater independence and stability. But its value goes beyond energy. These plants generate organic fertilizers that replace chemicals derived from petroleum and offer a real solution to waste management. The slurry or agricultural remains will be produced the same, with or without a plant; The difference is that biogas allows them to be turned into a resource instead of leaving them as an environmental problem. Context. A biogas plant is essentially a stomach where bacteria break down organic waste without oxygen, known as anaerobic digestion. From here two products are obtained: a gas rich in methane and a fertilizer. Depending on the gas obtained, the plant is simply biogas or biomethane: biogas is methane combined with carbon dioxide in almost equal parts, so it is a “weak” fuel that is usually burned on site to generate electricity or local heat. However, biomethane plants add a refining step (removing carbon dioxide) to obtain a gas similar to fossil natural gas. In Europe, the biogas sector is a consolidated industry with more than 19,000 plantsof which almost half are in Germany. A picture says a thousand words: this Europe biomethane plants map of Gas Infrastructure Europe shows the density in states like Germany or Denmark compared to the Spanish desert. The ecological dilemma. For engineer Xavier Flotats, the general rejection is a contradiction: “For some activists, it is better that a landfill is emitting methane into the atmosphere than taking the waste to a biogas plant to do something useful with it.” And he goes deeper by explaining that although this outgoing digestate has 95% of the input composition by weight, its composition changes, it is mineralized and converted into fertilizer. Valladares assures that biogas plants are greenwashing in that the process does not make the waste disappear, they only remove 5%. And that “Biogas plants cannot be understood without the macro farms industrial poultry, pigs and cows.” For the biologist at the National Museum of Natural Sciences, the only viable plants are few, small, safe and expensive. Marina Gros, representative of Ecologistas en Acción recognizes that “There are discrepancies within the organization because there is debate, there are different visions.” And in fact, have published a guide to evaluate case by case. The elephant in the room. Beneath the biogas dilemma inevitably lies the controversy of macro farms: In the event of a possible deployment of plants, the reality would be that part of the biogas produced in the state would depend on its slurry. There are those who see this as taking advantage of an already existing problem, but for other people it represents a facelift to a type of industrial livestock farming designed to maximize productivity at a lower cost compared to animal welfare and the environmental balance of the territory. Separate the wheat from the chaff. Faced with this flood of projects, experts agree on the importance of distinguishing sustainable plans from those that are not. Some signs that indicate that a project is reasonable include choosing a location close to the waste it manages and operating on a regional scale, with a plan to use the digestate as a local fertilizer and a design that guarantees total watertightness. On the contrary, there are signs that are authentic red flag: that the plant is far from the waste but close to gas pipelines, the absence of plans for digestate, the reception of waste in open pits, competition with other plants for raw materials or a logic of an industrial macroplant detached from the territory. In Xataka | A strange source of energy is putting Europe’s energy unity at risk: manure In Xataka | The ace up Spain’s sleeve to grow even more in the renewable energy landscape: biomethane Cover | Spencer DeMera and Eli DeFaria

those who follow this Japanese custom and clean less at home and those who do not

Everyone does what they want at home, but there are habits that are better than others and customs that, although you may like them more or less individually, may be a cultural custom specific to your region. Without going any further, there is one that raises blisters and that no one is completely clear about: take off your shoes when entering the house. Without going any further, the map that you see below these lines and crowning the article is from Wikimedia: in green, the states that take off their shoes when they get home and in blue, those that do not. We tend to associate this habit with Japan and although it is probably the best-known country where it is applied, it is not the only one. Essentially almost all of Asia takes off its shoes, also North Africa and Canada. The latest Wikimedia map on Which countries take off their shoes at home and which don’t In fact, custom is multicultural and independent. Thus, in Japan they even have an area of ​​the house set up for this purpose, the genkanwith a step called agari kamachi where the sacred limit is established between the “outer world” (dirty) and the “inner world” (clean), as the digital media Nippon explains. In Nordic countries the custom is more related to the weather: moving around the house with shoes full of mud or snow does not seem like the best idea. In the Middle East, the origin points to religion. Without going any further, the Quran has some verses like this from Allah to Moses: “I am your Lord; take off your sandals, for you are in the sacred valley of Tuwa.” The question that bothers half the world: with or without shoes at home? In the discussion forum You can see how some places have changed their tones over the years, such as Middle Eastern countries such as Pakistan or Afghanistan and more recently, the United Kingdom. More than a new custom (although COVID made some hygiene measures stay forever), it is that this habit was probably not well monitored. Although the British case is curious. The world map of the tradition of taking off shoes at home. Seasia.co a few years ago a Reddit thread echoed an original map from Seasia.co (which also had your articlefocused on Southeast Asia) much richer because it goes one step further. It’s no longer that there are places where they take off their shoes and others that don’t, it’s just that there are places where it seems wrong for us to do so. In that small group appear Spain, France, Italy and all of central and southern America. Just the opposite of what happens in the majority of Asia and Africa: if you go to a house there and choose to leave your shoes on following your customs, you will be having a rude gesture. Here the United Kingdom finds its nuance: the norm is to leave your shoes on, but in some homes they prefer to take them off. Shoes yes or shoes no? Leaving aside religious issues and focusing on practice, the reality is that taking off your shoes is a good practice from a hygiene point of view. This study from Macquarie University in Sydney makes it clear: up to 60% of the dust and dirt that accumulates inside a house comes from outside and enters, effectively, through the feet. The pharmacist Álvaro Fernández account in El Periódico de Aragón that “99% of the shoes analyzed test positive for fecal matter” because well, we walk through places where there are traces of excrement and dirt. Microbiologist Jonathan Sexton of the University of Arizona, confirm for Very Interesting the presence in almost all soles of bacteria such as E.coli (present in 96% of cases) and Clostridium difficile. And not only microorganisms: according to The Conversation, Shoes have pesticides from gardens, lead from urban dust and carcinogenic asphalt sealers, all of that goes home. But there is no need to be shocked either: there are fecal bacteria in our mobile and that’s not why we leave it on the doorstep of the house. Simply put: the best way to have a clean house is not to clean, it is not to stain. Prevention is better than cure. Of course, everyone in their house does what they want. In Xataka | The nations of the world and their stereotypes, seen by Japan in this amazing map from 1932 In Xataka | We had suspected for decades that Imperial Japan had a “great Mongolian route.” And finally we have found your maps Cover | Wikimedia

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.