biggest

The US is using an exascale power supercomputer to solve the biggest challenge of nuclear fusion

by

The Frontier supercomputer at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) linked to the US Department of Energy is one of the most powerful on the planet. In fact, it is currently the second most capable exascale supercomputer after El Capitan according to TOP500 ranking. These machines are very valuable tools that are already being used by researchers to try to solve some of the most complex scientific problems that humanity faces. And one of them is the behavior of plasma when it is under the influence of a magnetic field. A group of ORNL researchers is using two of the most powerful tools currently available to humans, the Frontier supercomputer and the artificial intelligence (AI), to understand with the greatest possible precision the chaotic behavior of the plasma of stars. An important note before moving forward: plasma is an extremely hot gas made up of particles endowed with an electrical charge, which is why it can be confined inside a magnetic field. This knowledge can presumably help scientists very accurately simulate the supernovaswhich are nothing more than the explosions that occur when a massive star loses hydrostatic balance by burning most of its fuel. When a supernova is triggered, a good part of the chemical elements that the star has produced through chemical reactions nuclear fusion It shoots towards the stellar medium with a lot of energy. From supernovae to experimental nuclear fusion reactors Dr. Eliu Huerta, a computational scientist at the Argonne National Laboratory (USA) who has had the opportunity to supervise the work of the ORNL researchers, express clearly why this scientific initiative is so important: “This type of capability has long been the dream of astrophysicists and many other scientists. This is the first time that this level of understanding has been achieved through AI for systems of this complexity (…) The more chaotic the system, the more difficult it is to simulate it.” Understanding very precisely how the plasma of stars behaves is important not only to have more information about supernovae; It is also crucial for predict solar flaresor even to simulate the interaction of the Earth’s magnetic field and the high-energy ionized atomic nuclei that constitute the cosmic radiation. Frontier’s role in this research is critical: it provides the computational power required to train the models needed to generate thousands of detailed plasma simulations. Inside nuclear fusion reactors it is still a challenge to keep turbulence under control However, there is another application in which this technology has the ability to make a difference: the development of nuclear fusion reactors. We can intuitively imagine a nuclear fusion reactor as a pressure cooker in which two essential ingredients are cooked: deuterium and tritium. In order for the nuclei of these two hydrogen isotopes to fuse and release the neutron that will ultimately allow us to obtain a large amount of energy, it is necessary to confine them in an extremely hot plasma. In fact, for this process to take place it must reach a temperature of at least 150 million degrees Celsius. Scientists know how to do it, so subjecting deuterium and tritium nuclei to the pressure and temperature necessary to make them fuse is no longer a problem. What still represents a challenge is to achieve keep turbulence under control. Otherwise the plasma will be destabilized, its density in critical regions will be affected and sustaining the fusion reaction over time will not be possible. The mechanisms that govern this process are very complex, but little by little physicists and engineers working on fusion energy are managing to understand them better. The research of ORNL scientists seeks to better understand the behavior of plasma confined inside the vacuum chamber of experimental nuclear fusion reactors with one purpose: to minimize turbulence so that energy loss is minimal. And they are on the right track. In fact, they already have a system ready that is capable of delivering very detailed turbulence predictions in just a few seconds, thus reducing errors by more than half compared to previous methods. Image | Fusion For Energy More information | ORNL | Interesting Engineering In Xataka | ITER has faced one of the great challenges of nuclear fusion: preventing plasma at 150 million ºC from destroying the reactor

The debate about whether the biggest pop star can be canceled is settled with a box office of 217 million in one weekend

by

97 million dollars in its first weekend in the United States. 217 million worldwide. ‘Michael’, the biopic of Michael Jackson that has taken years to reach theaters between lawsuits, reshoots millionaires and a third act rewritten from scratch, has just broken all records for musical biographical cinema. Critics destroy it with 38% on Rotten Tomatoes, but the public fills the theaters. Which, alone, says more about the state of popular culture than any analysis. Unexpected record. The initial projections The domestic opening grosses for ‘Michael’ were around $50-60 million, which would have already been a record in the profitable genre of biopics of pop artists. The final result (97 million in the United States and 217 globally) has far surpassed it. The previous record belonged to ‘Straight Outta Compton’, the biopic of rappers NWA, which opened with 60.2 million in its first week in the US. ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ premiered with 51 million, although it reached 900 globally. Criticism no. Something that had greatly dampened these expectations was the low critical ratingbut the CinemaScore score (the actual audience satisfaction index in the theater) was A-, very notable. The difference between critical opinion and commercial results reflects a reality we have already talked about and that has had another very recent example-type, ‘Super Mario Galaxy’. And like that one, this ‘Michael’ has a very clear type of audience in mind: the fans. A long way. ‘Michael’ has had one of the most complicated productions in recent Hollywood. With a budget of $200 million, making it one of the most expensive biopics in history, the film had a third act depicting Jackson’s 2005 sexual abuse trial and subsequent acquittal. Lawyers for Jackson’s estate discovered a clause in the 1993 agreement with Jordan Chandler, one of the children whose father sued the singer, that expressly prohibited his on-screen representation in any form. Production was halted and went through an additional 22 days of filming, which added $15 million to the budget. This is what causes the film to end abruptly on the 1988 ‘Bad’ tour, suggesting that the singer’s story will continue in a subsequent film. The question is how the producers will manage to tell the most problematic part of Jackson’s life. Who watches over the watchers. It is not the first time that Jackson’s heirs (who are not his living relatives, but a trust administered by executors that is currently considered one of the estates most profitable in history, above Elvis or Prince, and which functions for practical purposes as a company that exploits the “Michael Jackson” brand) is fighting a legal battle to control the story. The most revealing case is that of ‘Leaving Neverland’the documentary released on HBO in 2019 that collected the detailed testimony of those who claimed to have suffered sexual abuse by the singer when they were children. He estate sued HBO, alleging that the documentary violated a non-defamation clause included in a contract signed by the platform in 1992 for the broadcast of a Jackson concert in Bucharest. The litigation dragged on for years, until in October 2024 both parties they reached an agreement which included the removal of the documentary from all media platforms. streaming officials in the United States. As of today, ‘Leaving Neverland’ is not legally available on any streaming service. streaming North American (in Spain it can be seen on Movistar Plus+). The image of the star. Anyone might think that the fame that Jackson projects with all these legal conflicts is not the most appropriate for a biopic that also wants to safeguard a non-conflictive image. But fans should not be underestimated when they move en bloc: in 2019, when ‘Leaving Neverland’ aired, there were reactions that then seemed signs of a turning point in Jackson’s fame: stations around the world stopped broadcasting his music, Pepsi canceled licensing agreements, sales and streaming of his catalog fell 4%. However, seven years later, all is forgiven or, at the very least, forgotten: his catalog is worth $1.5 billion (Sony Music paid 750 million dollars for half of it in 2024). And at the time of his death in 2009 his heirs, the aforementioned estatereceived 500 million dollars in debts. Now the exploitation and image rights of the singer are valued at 2,000 million. History repeats itself. It’s a pattern we already know with other biopics: ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ avoided the most controversial aspects of Freddie Mercury’s life, including his hedonistic way of dealing with his sexuality. Elton John’s ‘Rocketman’ was a bit tougher and didn’t do as well at the box office, but it was still a considerable success, especially among critics. ‘Elvis’ avoided the many chiaroscuros in Presley’s life and triumphed in awards and the box office. The formula of the heir- or family-approved musical biopic, focused on music and celebratory versions of the artists’ lives, has proven to be more profitable than more cumbersome alternatives. Moral: there are cancellations… and cancellations. The figures of streaming of Jackson’s catalog fell for months after ‘Leaving Neverland’, but made a full recovery in 2020 and has been on an upward trajectory for years. ‘MJ the Musical’ has been on Broadway since 2021 earning more than a million dollars weeklywith imminent adaptations around the world. The Las Vegas show signed by Cirque du Soleil about Jackson has just extend your contract until 2030. The truth is that for an artist of this scale, cancellation operates in a different dimension. The cultural debate exists (and will continue to exist, with real accusers whose trial starts in November) but runs in parallel, without interfering with the economy of the phenomenon. It’s not that fans have forgotten about the controversy: it’s that there is a chasm between it and the market. In Xataka | The archive of disturbing paintings that Michael Jackson commissioned of himself

As we look to the Middle East, the Arctic has become the hiding place for Russia’s biggest challenge to NATO: Borei and Yasen

by

One of the greatest fears of Western navies was not a direct attack, but something much more disturbing: not knowing where the opponent was. That feeling became especially evident when, in the middle of the Cold War, a Soviet submarine managed follow a naval group American for days without being detected, demonstrating that in certain scenarios the true power is not in striking first, but in remaining invisible long enough. It is not seen, but it does not stop. They had an extensive report in Bloomberg that, hundreds of meters under a mountain in northern Norway, NATO relentlessly monitors a dashboard that does not appear in the daily headlines, but has never stopped being active. While global attention focuses and rightly so most visible conflictsin the depths of the North Atlantic there is a constant competition to detect, follow and keep track of the adversary’s most sensitive assets. It is, if you will, a silent, technical and permanent surveillance, one where the margin of error is minimal and where the absence of news does not mean, by any means, absence of activity. The Arctic as a strategic epicenter. As we said, although the political and media focus has irremediably shifted to the Middle Eastthe real pulse between Russia and NATO is moving further and further towards the arcticthousands of meters under the sea in an environment that combines isolation, depth and extreme conditions that make any monitoring difficult. This region, which for years was seen as peripheral, has regained its centrality for the opening of new routes, resources and, above all, for its military value as a transit and concealment space. In this scenario, ice and geography, more than obstacles, are natural allies for those who know how to take advantage of them. AND Moscow has the advantage. Welcome ceremony for the Borei K550 class nuclear submarine “Alexander Nevsky” at the permanent base in Vilyuchinsk Borei and Yasen: the Russian challenge. The heart of this strategy is the new generation submarines deployed by Vladimir Putin, especially the classes Borei and Yasendesigned to operate for long periods without being detected and capable of carrying strategic weapons. While they don’t always match their Western counterparts in stealth, they remembered in Bloomberg They compensate with tactics adapted to the Arctic environment, such as operating under the ice sheet or protected by other units, which greatly complicates their location. Perhaps for this reason, for NATO the greatest risk is not their presence, but rather the moment in which they are no longer under control. K-560 Severodvinsk A constant chase. It we have counted before. For decades, the key point to detect these submarines was the well-known GIUK runnerbetween Greenland, Iceland and the United Kingdom, but technological and operational advances have pushed this hunting species towards higher latitudes. Now, the objective is to intercept them before they abandon the relatively shallow waters of the Barents Sea and enter areas where they can disappear more easily. This evolution has forced to strengthen cooperation between allies now deploy surveillance systems increasingly sophisticated. Europe in the shadows. It happens that, in the face of uncertainty Regarding the long-term commitment of the United States, European countries are increasing their involvement in this surveillance, with Norway as a centerpiece and partners such as the United Kingdom, Germany or Canada, strengthening capacities and coordination. The result of this has been translated in new acquisitionsjoint exercises and advanced deployments, all movements that reflect a transition in which Europe tries to assume more responsibility for its own defense, especially in an environment as critical as the Arctic. A new Cold War under the ice. Yes, because the result brings us closer to a scenario that increasingly reminds us of the (il)logic of the Cold War, but this time with the difference that now there are much more advanced tools and a geopolitical context. completely different. The russian northern fleetmodernized and prioritized within its military structure, represents one of the Kremlin’s main deterrence capabilities, especially as its conventional forces show weaknesses on other fronts. And in that unstable balance, the Arctic seems to consolidate itself as a lucky “perfect hiding place”a place where Russia’s greatest challenge to NATO is not announced, it is simply happening under the cold sheet of ice. Image | NDUP, Mil.ru In Xataka | A nuclear giant designed to make way in the Arctic: this is the most modern icebreaker in the Russian fleet In Xataka | Russia and China already had an advantage over the US in the Arctic. After Greenland, it has multiplied

It has been the biggest marketing campaign for Apple. and free

by

I don’t know what someone who saw the moon landing felt. Apollo 11 in 1969but I do know that a couple of weeks ago half the Internet was glued to social networks to see everything the crew of Artemis II I was sharing. The moment in which the capsule returned to Earth It was exciting, but this time humanity had something unthinkable 50 years ago to follow the event. A iPhone 17 Pro Max. NASA didn’t want… When you travel 400,000 kilometers from home, you have to think very hard about what equipment you carry in your suitcase. Like any tourist, American NASA astronauts go with a camera, a Nikon Z9. It has its reason: NASA and the Japanese firm have an agreement to use these cameras. However, the most iconic photo of this trip wasn’t taken with a Nikon: it was taken with an iPhone. The Photon by Christina Koch With an iPhone 17 Pro Max, specifically. For years, NASA has refused to allow its astronauts to carry their cell phones because it is not essential for communications and, in addition, it can interfere with the systems of the ships and capsules. But For this occasion they relaxed the rules a little and things went well. The iPhone was going in airplane modeconnected solely to Orion’s internal network to transmit data to stations on Earth. And, seeing the success, they will surely repeat. The video. Because they are no longer just the photos: it is the tremendous video that Reid Wiseman, commander of the mission, has shared with the world. Before going into detail, here it is: It’s taken with that iPhone 17 Pro Max, using the 8x 406,771 kilometers away from Earth to capture how the planet was hiding behind the Moon. According to Wiseman, it is a focal length very similar to that of the human eye (you have to trust it, obviously) and the experience was like watching the sunset on the beach, but from the cosmos. For her part, astronaut Christina Koch also captured a video in which the iPhone looms mischievously in the reflection: The best camera. The iPhone is the mobile phone that captures the best video, although its telephotos are not even close to what they offer chinese mobile phonesnot on video either. However, as they say, the best camera is the one you always have with you. This is as true as a temple, and this case is a perfect example because the Nikon Z9 with its huge lenses could not fit through the gap in the docking hatch window to make that video. The iPhone does. Apple, so happy. After all the commotion caused by the photos taken on this mission (due to the quantity of them, the quality and how quickly they have been shared), we might think that Apple and NASA signed an agreement, but it seems that is not the case. Simply, it is one more tool than astronauts they came on board to document everything, since the agreement that does exist is the one they have with Nikon. If there was one with Apple, it would be public. But the truth is that Apple has just had the best ‘shot on iPhone‘ of his story. The company has been pushing that narrative of “we record our events with the iPhone because it is a beastly camera” for years, and now, four astronauts have put those iPhones to the test more than 400,000 kilometers from Earth. I have no doubt that in the September keynote we will see Apple take advantage of those photos captured with the iPhone on the Moon. And I can only think of how eager Chinese companies will be for their missions to start taking off so they can do the same. Images | Artemis II, NASA In Xataka | The mobile phones with the best camera 2026: next level photography in your pocket

We thought that the price of World Cup tickets in the US was going to be the biggest nonsense. Wait to travel by train

by

The World Cup is a universal spectacle, but its prices during the tournament that will be held this summer in North America (United States, Mexico and Canada) will not exactly be within reach of all budgets. Especially if you want to enjoy the final, which will be played July 19 in it MetLife Stadium from New Jersey. And not just because their tickets are sold at exorbitant prices. The region’s public transportation operator has revealed that round-trip tickets between Manhattan and MetLife will cost 150 dollars. That decision has already generated a intense controversy. What has happened? That the celebration of the World Cup in the US is being marred by the enormous cost what it will mean for the fans. Until now we knew that those privileged who want to follow the matches directly in the stadiums will have to pay stratospheric sums for the tickets, especially if we talk about the final which will be played at the end of July at MetLife Stadium. That was relatively predictable. Now we know something else: even tickets to go to the stadium on public transport will be priced at the price of gold. Are they that expensive? Yes. A week ago The New York Times has already advanced that round-trip tickets to MetLife from New York’s Pennsylvania Station would cost more than $100, although the public transportation operator, New York Transit (NJT), was reluctant to confirm the information. The mystery did not last long. On Friday, when announcing the mobility plan for the World Cup, the company revealed (almost in passing) that the filtration of Times had fallen short. “Non-transferable, non-refundable, round-trip train tickets will be on sale exclusively to ticket holders on May 13 through NJ Transit for $150,” keep it up the operator when informing of the transportation services that will connect MetLife Stadium, renamed temporarily as New York New Jersey Stadium to conform to FIFA’s sponsorship policy. In the same statement NJT explains that round-trip bus tickets (also non-transferable and non-refundable) will be sold for $80. Is it more expensive than normal? A lot more. NBC News I remembered These days a round-trip ticket to MetLife Stadium usually costs $12.9, so the fare that those who want to use the train on the day of the final will have to pay will be 11 times higher than normal. The price will be very superior This is what fans who travel between Penn Station (New York) and MetLife pay to enjoy NFL Jets or Giants games. Although the price of bus tickets will also quadruple in Boston, where they will be disputed four gamesthere has been international competitions in which fans with tickets could freely use public transport. In the case of the USA, The Wall Street Journal remember that the original 2018 pact between host cities and FIFA included free transportation, but the requirement was relaxed a few years ago. Now fans must pay $150 for a trip that is covered in less than half an hour by car. Click on the image to go to the tweet. Has it generated controversy? Yes. Because of the amount itself (150), but also because the NJT plan does not contemplate Reduced rates, which means that children and seniors will have to pay the same amount as everyone else. It is important because MetLife Stadium will host a total of eight games of the World Cup in which the teams of Brazil, France, Germany and England (among others) will compete. Among those events also includes the most significant of all: the final. Those who want to skip the train or bus and go by car to MetLife will not have it easy either. The celebration of the World Cup will cut considerably the availability of parking in the area, which explains, among other things, that passes are being offered to park in the parking lot of a shopping center in the area for $225, such as has revealed NCB News. Why does it go up so much? That question connects directly with the political debate that has broken out in New Jersey around the World Cup, its costs for the public coffers and the return it will have for the region. Governor Mikie Sherrill (Democratic Party) assures having “inherited” an agreement by which FIFA “does not contribute a single dollar” for transportation and warned that NJ Transit will be forced to pay “a bill of 48 million dollars” to mobilize the tens of thousands of fans who will come to watch the games. MetLife Stadium seats more than 80,000 spectators and Sherrill’s message, just like the one NJT has transferred to the New York Times is clear: “The cost of the eight matches will not be borne by our regular users of public transport.” That is to say, the first step is for the fans (if not FIFA itself) to pay for the transportation required by the competition. Sherrill’s position has caused tensions with the federation, which warns of “deterrent” effect What will the train fares have and remember that MetLife has hosted other macro events without the organizers having to pay for transportation. During the debate, there was also talk of the income that FIFA will receive thanks to the tournament and the return for the USA. Is it just transportation? The truth is that no. The transport controversy is added to another that already goes back a long way: that of the price of tickets to enjoy the World Cup matches. A few weeks ago, FIFA already made headlines because tickets for the final were selling for up to $10,990. Not only are they astronomical figures that threaten to become “the most expensive in history”, as warns the BBC. They also far exceed those of a few months ago. In March, after the president of FIFA recognize that prices could “go up or down according to demand,” the OCU denounced the use of “dynamic pricing”. The rates already they have put on guard to Euroconsumers. Images | … Read more

His biggest problem is not money, but balance

by

Spending a vacation on board a cruise ship is a tourist option increasingly in demand even by travelers high purchasing power. However, Mario Salcedo, a millionaire who made his fortune in finance, decided 26 years ago to turn his daily life into a vacation. Since then, he has been linking cruise trips turning these giants of the sea in your home. However, this life of luxury aboard some of the largest pleasure ships has taken its toll on him: he has lost “his land legs” and is no longer able to walk in a straight line when he arrives in port. Always live on vacation. The millionaire of Cuban origin counted in 2019 to The New York Times He was never interested in starting a family, so his life on land only consisted of working and working. So one day he decided to leave his apartment in Miami behind and embark on a cruise. The experience impacted him so much that since then he has been combining one cruise with another and now his house has several decks, swimming pools, dance floors and some fleeting neighbors with whom he socializes whenever he can. After being a regular among the passage of the Royal Caribbean companythe crew already knows him as Super Mario. “I don’t have vacations. People come here to spend vacations. Not me, I’m here to live my life,” explains the millionaire. Life on board. The millionaire investor uses a reserved table on one of the cruise ship’s decks where a handwritten sign reads “Super Mario Office.” Obviously They do not refer to the Nintendo characterif not to the place from which the millionaire sits every day for a few hours in front of his laptop to telework. In this way he has paid for the more than 1,154 cruises he has completed in his life on the high seas. The millionaire claims to dedicate between 70,000 and 100,000 dollars a year for his travels. The millionaire counted on an interview for Condé Nast magazine, who booked an inside cabin without a balcony, because “I don’t do anything in my cabin except shower, get dressed and sleep,” he explained. The rest of the day he could be found in his “office”, socializing with other travelers or dancing in one of the ship’s dance rooms. To avoid having to constantly change cabins, Salcedo plans it 150 reservations in advance, linking one voyage to another. The worst thing about living on a cruise ship is getting to port. Everything would indicate that the biggest cost of living on a cruise ship is money. However, for “Super Mario” the greatest sacrifice is going ashore. After more than 25 years rocked by the sway of the waves on the best cruises, the millionaire has developed a rare disease called landing disease. This is a rare disorder that affects the vestibular system of the ear which affects balance giving a constant sensation of movement even when you are stable and motionless on dry land. It is popularly known as “earth legs.” Usually, this is a disorder that lasts at most for a couple of days, but when your life takes place on the high seas, and you only spend a total of fifteen days a year on land, the disease becomes chronic. “I have lost my land legs. I sway so much that I can’t walk in a straight line. I am so used to being on boats that I feel more comfortable than on land,” he said in his interview. Doesn’t usually go ashore. There is no doubt that Mario Salcedo is like a fish in water on board a cruise, so the few times he goes ashore he does so to take a plane to take him to his next cruise, when they dock in Miami to check that everything is still in order in his apartment or when he has to make arrangements with the bank or medical visits. Luckily, except for his problem with balance when he steps on dry land, the millionaire in his sixties is in good health. A key factor for “Super Mario” to continue his adventure on the high seas, given that shipping companies prohibit that a person who requires constant medical care comes on board. In Xataka | Amsterdam has grown tired of too many tourists. And he has found a solution: fight the cruise ships Image | Royal Caribbean A version of this article was published in 2026

They have become your biggest enemy

by

The generation that has been born and raised with internet in your pocket is showing signs of being up to the top of the AI. The initial enthusiasm sparked by the massive arrival of AI tools among young people of Generation Z has given way to something much less glamorous: distrust, anger and, in the work environment, an active resistance to using AI that is catching many companies off guard. A survey of 1,572 young people of that generation carried out by Gallup, the Walton Family Foundation and GSV Ventures records a change in attitude among members of Generation Z that contradicts the image of a technology-enthusiast digital native generation. The great disappointment in numbers. According to the study According to Gallup, the share of Gen Zers who say they are excited about AI plummeted from 36% in 2025 to 22% in 2026, a decline of 14 percentage points. Those who describe themselves as optimistic increased from 27% to 18%, while those who express anger or rage towards AI grew from 22% to 31%. Anxiety, which already had high percentages in the 2025 data, has remained stable, going from 41% to 42%. The unrest of young people has a very specific trigger: the fear of the lack of employment opportunities. According to the data published by The New York Times48% of young people from Generation Z consider that the risks of AI in the labor market outweigh its benefits. Only 15% perceive this technology as a benefit. Additionally, 80% of young people surveyed believe that relying on AI to complete tasks faster is an obstacle to long-term learning, revealing a distrust that goes beyond employment and affects how young people perceive their own development. They use AI, but reluctantly. Despite the great disappointment expressed by the genzers51% continue to use AI weekly, although that percentage has only grown four points compared to 2025, being an obvious symptom of a slowdown in the adoption of AI. Zach Hrynowski, a senior education researcher at Gallup, attributes this continuity not to enthusiasm but to pragmatic acceptance: Young people use AI because they understand they can’t ignore it, not because they like it. The researcher also points out that the oldest members of that generation are the ones who express the most anger, precisely because they are the ones who are entering a labor market in which AI threatens the jobs they have. they must occupy. Silent office sabotage. Generation Z’s discomfort with AI is not limited to statistics. a report Prepared by the business AI company Writer and the consulting firm Workplace Intelligence, based on interviews with 2,400 workers in the US, the United Kingdom and Europe, it revealed that 29% of employees admit to having actively sabotaged their company’s AI implementation strategy. Among Generation Z workers, that percentage rises to 44%. Forms of sabotage range from introducing sensitive information into public AI tools, using unauthorized applicationsrefusing to use imposed AI tools, or manipulating performance evaluations to make AI appear less effective. 30% of those who admit these behaviors say they act this way because fear of losing your job. Adapt or fall behind. The research in Harvard Business Review also point to why resistance to succumbing to AI has increased among this generation: when AI frustrates basic psychological needs such as the feeling of being competent, autonomous or having meaningful connections at work, employees not only reject it, but perceive it as an existential threat. Companies, for their part, do not seem willing to wait: 60% of managers surveyed by Writer acknowledge that they are considering letting go of employees who refuse to adopt AI, and 69% have plans to make layoffs related to this technology in the coming months. In Xataka | “I’ve worked every day for the last three years”: the price of becoming the youngest AI millionaire Image | Pexels (cottonbro studio)

We were going to turn trash into clean energy. Now the biogas sector faces its biggest challenge: convincing neighbors

by

Spain may be emerging as great power in solar and wind energybut there are other green energies that choke him. The Spanish state is not having a nose for biogas. Or rather: it doesn’t smell good, in the most literal sense of the word. However, the sector has practically gone from zero to one hundred in record time: in just two years there are more than 200 biogas projects on the table in different processing phases. And they bring with them a problem: biogas is the green energy that no one wants close to home. The problem: energy transition vs. social rejection. In the roadmap for Spain’s energy transition (the PNIEC 2030), whose ultimate goal is for the state to achieve emissions neutrality by 2050, biogas has its role. But to make it possible, it is an essential requirement to build and launch plants. And here it collides with a wall of social rejection in the form of citizen platforms, not so much to the technology itself, but to the implementation model. There are no shortage of reasons: from the classic fear of bad smell to the lack of territorial planning, promoter companies that present projects without setting foot on the territory and talking to those who live there, the gigantism of some facilities or the shadow of macro farms as arguments, such as They explain for El País the emeritus professor of Environmental Engineering at the Polytechnic University of Catalonia Xavier Flotats and the biologist and researcher at the National Museum of Natural Sciences Fernando Valladares. Why is it important. That biogas appears in Spain’s energy transition strategy implies that, sooner or later, it will materialize; the key now is in the as. It is also a direct path to energy sovereignty that replaces natural gas. Just take a look at the electricity price map in Europe To understand it: countries that depend on imported fossil fuels suffer from price volatility, while those who have opted for their own alternatives They achieve greater independence and stability. But its value goes beyond energy. These plants generate organic fertilizers that replace chemicals derived from petroleum and offer a real solution to waste management. The slurry or agricultural remains will be produced the same, with or without a plant; The difference is that biogas allows them to be turned into a resource instead of leaving them as an environmental problem. Context. A biogas plant is essentially a stomach where bacteria break down organic waste without oxygen, known as anaerobic digestion. From here two products are obtained: a gas rich in methane and a fertilizer. Depending on the gas obtained, the plant is simply biogas or biomethane: biogas is methane combined with carbon dioxide in almost equal parts, so it is a “weak” fuel that is usually burned on site to generate electricity or local heat. However, biomethane plants add a refining step (removing carbon dioxide) to obtain a gas similar to fossil natural gas. In Europe, the biogas sector is a consolidated industry with more than 19,000 plantsof which almost half are in Germany. A picture says a thousand words: this Europe biomethane plants map of Gas Infrastructure Europe shows the density in states like Germany or Denmark compared to the Spanish desert. The ecological dilemma. For engineer Xavier Flotats, the general rejection is a contradiction: “For some activists, it is better that a landfill is emitting methane into the atmosphere than taking the waste to a biogas plant to do something useful with it.” And he goes deeper by explaining that although this outgoing digestate has 95% of the input composition by weight, its composition changes, it is mineralized and converted into fertilizer. Valladares assures that biogas plants are greenwashing in that the process does not make the waste disappear, they only remove 5%. And that “Biogas plants cannot be understood without the macro farms industrial poultry, pigs and cows.” For the biologist at the National Museum of Natural Sciences, the only viable plants are few, small, safe and expensive. Marina Gros, representative of Ecologistas en Acción recognizes that “There are discrepancies within the organization because there is debate, there are different visions.” And in fact, have published a guide to evaluate case by case. The elephant in the room. Beneath the biogas dilemma inevitably lies the controversy of macro farms: In the event of a possible deployment of plants, the reality would be that part of the biogas produced in the state would depend on its slurry. There are those who see this as taking advantage of an already existing problem, but for other people it represents a facelift to a type of industrial livestock farming designed to maximize productivity at a lower cost compared to animal welfare and the environmental balance of the territory. Separate the wheat from the chaff. Faced with this flood of projects, experts agree on the importance of distinguishing sustainable plans from those that are not. Some signs that indicate that a project is reasonable include choosing a location close to the waste it manages and operating on a regional scale, with a plan to use the digestate as a local fertilizer and a design that guarantees total watertightness. On the contrary, there are signs that are authentic red flag: that the plant is far from the waste but close to gas pipelines, the absence of plans for digestate, the reception of waste in open pits, competition with other plants for raw materials or a logic of an industrial macroplant detached from the territory. In Xataka | A strange source of energy is putting Europe’s energy unity at risk: manure In Xataka | The ace up Spain’s sleeve to grow even more in the renewable energy landscape: biomethane Cover | Spencer DeMera and Eli DeFaria

The biggest find in twelve years of GTA archeology came from an Edinburgh flea market and a used Xbox 360

by

It’s fascinating when we discover details years (even decades) after a game’s release that hadn’t come to light before. Secret levels in classics that everyone had examined from cover to cover, unrevealed meanings, unsolved puzzles… and sometimes, versions of the games that should never have seen the light of day and that give clues about the ideas that were considered in the development process. The latest case in that sense: ‘GTA IV’. What has happened? Last weekend, a user of GTAForums known as janmatant He paid £5 at a flea market in Edinburgh for an Xbox 360 in not very good condition. At home he discovered that the console was running Xshell, the operating system for Microsoft development kits. The 120 GB hard drive contained a single game: a beta version of ‘Grand Theft Auto IV’ dated November 2007, several months before its commercial release. The treasures he found were poured into the thread GTA IV Beta Huntwho has been tracking unreleased content from the game since 2014 (and which has generated 14 new pages of comments since posting janmatant). GTA IV on the trail. That the discovery occurred in Edinburgh is not at all coincidental. Rockstar North has been based in the capital since it was DMA Design, in 1987, and that is why the console ended up in the hands of a scrap dealer, a process that clearly should not have happened. Development kits are proprietary hardware that Microsoft distributes exclusively to studios (and in those days also to the press) to run games in conditions close to the final hardware. In theory, at the end of a project cycle, those units are returned or destroyed, but this was not the case. 118 gigabytes of Liberty City. After confirming by the serial number that the devkit was authentic, janmatant uploaded the content to the Internet Archive under the title “Great Stealing of Vehicles four XDK”. The 118 GB file is it executable on a real Xbox 360 with debugging tools, although a fully playable version is not yet ready. The most immediate find was the Liberty City ferries. The barges appear in the game’s first trailer and in some cutscenes, but in the final game they are just a set piece. The realistic ‘GTA IV’ opted for a world focused on cars and taxis and in its day, Obbe Vermeij, former technical director of Rockstar North, counted that the shuttles were removed late in development, with models already finished. Zombie mode. There had always been rumors about a zombie mode for which we had never had solid evidence. Herein build We find hospital beds with direct references to zombies, early models of infected characters and several animations associated with this variant. The Cutting Room Floorthe wiki dedicated to documenting cut content in video games, had already listed the project as “Z: Resurrection” based on code fragments found in the final version, but without visual material to support it. A former Rockstar developer It has taken away some of the epicness of the matter: According to him, zombie mode was simply an “experiment” that artists and programmers played to develop in parallel, not a formal production line. That doesn’t mean the discovery is minor, but rather that the creative leeway within Rockstar North in 2007 allowed a team to test out survival horror mechanics during development. Other divergences. The build includes other substantial differences from the final game. The silenced pistol is in this version’s arsenal, along with other unfinished weapons and a notable number of incomplete animations and unreplaced audio markers, as is the case with any half-developed game. The models of some NPCs are different from the final ones, and the character of Michelle, the FIB informant who appears as Niko Bellic’s early romantic interest, has a look here that forum users describe as strangely disturbing. What may be most surprising to any fan of the game is that about half of the radio stations sound completely different. ‘GTA IV’ has one of the most elaborate soundtracks in the saga, with dozens of real music licenses distributed on thematic stations. That half of that content changed between November 2007 and the April 2008 release says a lot about the licensing negotiation process in the final phases of development. What does Rockstar do? After everything that happened, Rockstar Games and Take-Two have not issued public statements. Although companies have a reputation for relentlessly pursuing leaks, the author of this leak purchased the console legally. In any case, he has put the devkit up for sale on eBay for £800. It’s not too much for material of such magnitude, but the truth is that, once on the Internet, access to these secrets is universal. In Xataka | The best video games of 2026 and the most interesting ones to come

The biggest oil crisis is not making them blink for a second in the stock market

by

We have been immersed in what can now be cataloged like the Third Gulf War. Since the United States and Israel offensive against Iran began at the end of February, the world has faced the greatest disruption of energy supply of its history. We are talking about a crisis that has paralyzed 20% of the world’s crude oil, sequestering about 20 million barrels a day They cannot cross the Strait of Hormuz. Missile falls, drones setting fire to infrastructure and thousands of deaths in the region. The impasse. Any basic economics textbook would dictate that financial markets should be in complete panic. However, the opposite occurs. It is enough for the White House to hint at a rapprochement or a vague ceasefire for the stock market to skyrocket, ignoring the physical fundamentals of a war in full swing. Wall Street lives in a parallel reality: the biggest oil crisis does not make them blink for a second. A virtual collapse in the face of a real war. This same week, the markets experienced 48 hours of unprecedented volatility. As detailed oil priceoil prices fell sharply in the Asian session on Wednesday, falling more than 5%. Brent crude oil, the reference in Europe, pierced downwards the psychological barrier of $100, while the US WTI fell to $87.51. The reason for this relief? According to the agency Reutersthe United States would have sent a 15-point peace proposal to Iran through intermediaries in Pakistan. US President Donald Trump boasted to the media that “productive” negotiations were moving toward a resolution. The screens of the traders were automatically dyed green: the European STOXX 600 index rose 1.2% and London’s FTSE 100 rose 1.1%. As Amelie Derambure explainedfrom the manager Amundi, the market simply launched itself to buy the idea of ​​a relief rally (a surge of relief) at the possibility of a temporary ceasefire. The bombs keep falling. However, there is no ceasefire; This should be clear. How to collect ReutersEbrahim Zolfaqari, spokesman for Iran’s joint military command, publicly addressed Trump on state television with these words: “Has the level of your internal struggle reached the stage of negotiating with yourself? We will never make a deal with you.” At the same time, military reality contradicts stock market optimism. The Pentagon prepares the deployment of elements of the 82nd Airborne Division to the region, a drone attack just hit a fuel tank at Kuwait International Airport, and Israel is deeply skeptical of any concessions Washington might make to Tehran in the shadows. Investors “bewitched” by the algorithm. To understand this disconnection you have to delve into the psychology of the market. An analysis published by FortunePaul Donovan, chief economist of UBSclaims that Wall Street is “spellbound” by the good news. “Markets do not react to information, they generally react to social media posts and headlines, even if they are fake news or contradictory,” says Donovan. Investors suffer from a cocktail of loss aversion and confirmation bias. They desperately want the war to end, so they embrace any story that confirms that desire and ignore negative news. Added to this, the “TACO” phenomenon (Trump Always Chickens Outor “Trump always cows”), a belief rooted in the New York trading floor that the tenant of the White House will end up backing down from the economic pain of a prolonged conflict to protect financial stability. Narrative as a weapon of war. Added to this is what energy expert Javier Blas defines in his column Bloomberg as jawboning (verbal intervention). The White House is winning the narrative battle in the markets without moving a single physical barrel. Trump’s constant messages in Social Truth promising a quick resolution—and even lifting sanctions on countries like Russia to flood the market—have managed to stop the panic. Blas sums it up perfectly: “Instead of being a sign of weakness, TACO is playing in Trump’s favor. No one knows for sure when or if he will try to end the war, which has been enough to prevent the traders skyrocket the price of oil.” The desperation to cling to any positive headline is such that it generates episodes of extreme volatility and information chaos. He Financial Times reported in his coverage how crude oil suffered wild fluctuations (Brent fell 11% to rebound shortly after) after a tweet by the US Secretary of Energy, Chris Wright, stating that the Navy was already escorting oil tankers through Hormuz. The message was deleted minutes later and denied by the White House itself, but the effect on the algorithms had already occurred. The bath of physical reality. While Wall Street plays a game of guessing the next tweets from the Oval Office, the physical reality of oil is stubborn. A report from Bloomberg puts his finger on the sore: The physical market continues to deal with shortages, and the war has demonstrated the absolute control that Iran exercises over the Strait of Hormuz. Although Tehran informed the International Maritime Organization that “non-hostile” ships can transit, the route remains effectively closed and reports circulate about the presence of dozens of naval mines Iranians in the area. The mathematics of disaster, detailed by Reutersthey are chilling. After 25 days of conflict, the world has stopped receiving 500 million barrels (the equivalent of five full days of global supply). The logistical desperation is such that Saudi Arabia has boosted its exports from the port of Yanbu, on the Red Sea, to avoid Hormuz. To compound the crisis, Russia has suspended cargoes at its Baltic ports following a vicious Ukrainian drone attack, adding more uncertainty to the global market. Larry Fink, CEO of the management company BlackRocksummed it up bluntly in statements to the BBC: “If Iran continues to be a threat to Hormuz and oil settles between $100 and $150 per barrel, we will have a global recession.” Collateral damage. The narrative chaos has even reached gold, which has lost their protection status. According to Financial Timesthe price of the precious metal has plummeted 16% since the start of … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.