We thought that the price of World Cup tickets in the US was going to be the biggest nonsense. Wait to travel by train

The World Cup is a universal spectacle, but its prices during the tournament that will be held this summer in North America (United States, Mexico and Canada) will not exactly be within reach of all budgets. Especially if you want to enjoy the final, which will be played July 19 in it MetLife Stadium from New Jersey. And not just because their tickets are sold at exorbitant prices. The region’s public transportation operator has revealed that round-trip tickets between Manhattan and MetLife will cost 150 dollars. That decision has already generated a intense controversy. What has happened? That the celebration of the World Cup in the US is being marred by the enormous cost what it will mean for the fans. Until now we knew that those privileged who want to follow the matches directly in the stadiums will have to pay stratospheric sums for the tickets, especially if we talk about the final which will be played at the end of July at MetLife Stadium. That was relatively predictable. Now we know something else: even tickets to go to the stadium on public transport will be priced at the price of gold. Are they that expensive? Yes. A week ago The New York Times has already advanced that round-trip tickets to MetLife from New York’s Pennsylvania Station would cost more than $100, although the public transportation operator, New York Transit (NJT), was reluctant to confirm the information. The mystery did not last long. On Friday, when announcing the mobility plan for the World Cup, the company revealed (almost in passing) that the filtration of Times had fallen short. “Non-transferable, non-refundable, round-trip train tickets will be on sale exclusively to ticket holders on May 13 through NJ Transit for $150,” keep it up the operator when informing of the transportation services that will connect MetLife Stadium, renamed temporarily as New York New Jersey Stadium to conform to FIFA’s sponsorship policy. In the same statement NJT explains that round-trip bus tickets (also non-transferable and non-refundable) will be sold for $80. Is it more expensive than normal? A lot more. NBC News I remembered These days a round-trip ticket to MetLife Stadium usually costs $12.9, so the fare that those who want to use the train on the day of the final will have to pay will be 11 times higher than normal. The price will be very superior This is what fans who travel between Penn Station (New York) and MetLife pay to enjoy NFL Jets or Giants games. Although the price of bus tickets will also quadruple in Boston, where they will be disputed four gamesthere has been international competitions in which fans with tickets could freely use public transport. In the case of the USA, The Wall Street Journal remember that the original 2018 pact between host cities and FIFA included free transportation, but the requirement was relaxed a few years ago. Now fans must pay $150 for a trip that is covered in less than half an hour by car. Click on the image to go to the tweet. Has it generated controversy? Yes. Because of the amount itself (150), but also because the NJT plan does not contemplate Reduced rates, which means that children and seniors will have to pay the same amount as everyone else. It is important because MetLife Stadium will host a total of eight games of the World Cup in which the teams of Brazil, France, Germany and England (among others) will compete. Among those events also includes the most significant of all: the final. Those who want to skip the train or bus and go by car to MetLife will not have it easy either. The celebration of the World Cup will cut considerably the availability of parking in the area, which explains, among other things, that passes are being offered to park in the parking lot of a shopping center in the area for $225, such as has revealed NCB News. Why does it go up so much? That question connects directly with the political debate that has broken out in New Jersey around the World Cup, its costs for the public coffers and the return it will have for the region. Governor Mikie Sherrill (Democratic Party) assures having “inherited” an agreement by which FIFA “does not contribute a single dollar” for transportation and warned that NJ Transit will be forced to pay “a bill of 48 million dollars” to mobilize the tens of thousands of fans who will come to watch the games. MetLife Stadium seats more than 80,000 spectators and Sherrill’s message, just like the one NJT has transferred to the New York Times is clear: “The cost of the eight matches will not be borne by our regular users of public transport.” That is to say, the first step is for the fans (if not FIFA itself) to pay for the transportation required by the competition. Sherrill’s position has caused tensions with the federation, which warns of “deterrent” effect What will the train fares have and remember that MetLife has hosted other macro events without the organizers having to pay for transportation. During the debate, there was also talk of the income that FIFA will receive thanks to the tournament and the return for the USA. Is it just transportation? The truth is that no. The transport controversy is added to another that already goes back a long way: that of the price of tickets to enjoy the World Cup matches. A few weeks ago, FIFA already made headlines because tickets for the final were selling for up to $10,990. Not only are they astronomical figures that threaten to become “the most expensive in history”, as warns the BBC. They also far exceed those of a few months ago. In March, after the president of FIFA recognize that prices could “go up or down according to demand,” the OCU denounced the use of “dynamic pricing”. The rates already they have put on guard to Euroconsumers. Images | … Read more

Booking has been hacked. If you thought phishing was dangerous, wait until you see the follow-up phishing attacks

Basic-Fit’s hack yesterday It has not been the only relevant event in terms of cybersecurity in recent days. Last weekend several Booking users received emails with less than reassuring content. In these messages, the company reported that a cyber attacker could have had access to the information on its reservations. On Monday Booking confirmed that the security flaw existedbut has not given too many details about the problem. Your name and reservations were leaked, your card details were not. The information accessed by the attacker(s) includes names, email addresses, phone numbers and booking details. However, Booking has highlighted that the users’ financial data have not been part of this unauthorized access and they have not accessed the users’ home addresses either. To try to mitigate possible problems, the company forced reset of backup PINs of all affected reserves, both active and past. Too many unknowns. Although it has confirmed the incident, Booking has not provided clarification on it and it is not clear if its systems were hacked directly or the problem occurred through other means. There are also no details on the number of users affected nor is it a problem of real scope or limited to certain countries or regions. Booking has indicated that it will inform affected users individually without giving figures. According to its own website, Booking manages hundreds of millions of reservations a year and it is estimated which have about 135 million users of their mobile app. Phishing attacks have already started. These types of data thefts are exploited for massive phishing attacks, and it appears that such attacks have already begun. At least one user indicated on Reddit that he had received a suspicious message on WhatsApp with details of his reservation and personal information. That seems to confirm that the attackers were already using the stolen data to deceive customers before the public announcement occurred. But beware of “tracking” phishing. But in this case the risk is somewhat greater because this is the type of platform from which we are not so surprised to see messages that inform us of the follow-up of the reservation (with the style “There is one week left for your trip!”). Precisely these types of smishing messages can now be generated by attackers fraudulently leveraging the reservation data they have extracted to appear legitimate. If you are a Booking customer and have a pending reservation, be especially careful if you receive one of these follow-up messages. It’s not the first time. In 2021, Dutch regulators fined Booking.com with 475,000 euros after a hack exposed the data of more than 4,000 customers, including credit card information in some cases. On that occasion, Booking notified the Dutch authorities of the cyberattack 22 days late, well above the 72-hour limit required by the GDPR, which caused the company to be fined. In June 2024, the platform itself warned that phishing attacks against its clients had increased by 900% thanks to the use of AI. The company has reported the security breach to Dutch authorities, but it remains to be seen if it again took too long and could face further fines. What to do if you are a Booking user. Theoretically nothing if you have not received an email from Booking.com notifying you of the problem. If you receive it, it is important that you distrust any message, call or WhatsApp that mentions details of your reservation even if they seem legitimate. Attackers may have data about your reservations and may be using it to deceive you. You should not provide your financial data through any channel other than the platform’s official website or app. This data can be used for phishing attacks from other services that use your name or email, since this information is usually sold to be reused by other groups that carry out massive phishing attacks. In Xataka | A family paid 1,800 euros for a tourist house in Galicia. Upon arrival there was no house and no response on Booking

Congratulations, you already program without knowing how to program. Now prepare to wait six weeks for Apple to listen to you

James Steinberg is a New Yorker, 35 years old, and has two professions. The first, cat sitter. The second, develop applications through vibecodinga technique in which knowing what one wants and iterating with AI manages to replace (in part) deep knowledge of areas such as software architecture or programming. Steinberg is not the exception, but the new norm in a phenomenon in which amateur programmers are saturating the software distribution system. Let them tell Apple. Wanting is power. There was a time when publishing an app on the App Store was a rite of passage for an engineer or software developer. After months of fighting with Swift or Objective-C, the app was ready and all that was missing was the blessing of the App Store and its strict terms of use. Today that wall has fallen, because since the vibecoding has appeared, the creation of software is no longer about being able to do things, but about wanting to do them. However, this democratization of programming comes at a price: before the problem was writing code, but now the bottleneck is get the App Store to validate it. The growth rate of apps published in the App Store has grown extraordinary since the end of 2025. The impact of vibecoding is evident. Source: BI. The explosion of agentic software. Data from the consulting firm Sensor Tower confirm that we are facing an extraordinary situation. In January 2026, the volume of new apps launched in the App Store in the US grew 54.8% compared to the previous year. A very similar figure had already been recorded in December: a 56% increase compared to the same month in 2024. Here there is not suddenly a batch of experts fresh out of university programming as if there were no tomorrow, but rather a bunch of “amateur programmers” who have used vibecoding to program their apps in a matter of minutes or hours and who have uploaded them to the App Store. Apple has a problem. When Steinberg or any other developer tries to publish their app on the App Store, they run into a problem: Apple’s validation process is dragging out and the average wait time is around six weeks to achieve the desired “green light.” Apple, aware that this saturation can damage its reputation, has wanted to come forward with figures to calm the market’s spirits. Apple says one thing, developers another. According to the company, 90% of the proposals it receives from all these programmers are reviewed in less than 48 hours, and the average wait is, according to the company, 1.5 days. In the last twelve weeks, Apple employees have analyzed more than 200,000 weekly shipments, which seems to make it clear that, at least according to them, the bottleneck is not that big. The developers don’t seem to be of the same opinion, and in forums and social networks there is talk of how reviews of existing updates take up to a week and new releases enter a kind of administrative limbo that exasperates this new legion of programmers. Apps that are AI Slop? A potential reason for this slowdown in deadlines may not only be the quantity of apps, but their quality. Both among traditional programmers and probably within Apple itself, there is a fear that this new batch of apps “vibecodeadas” is largely another variant of the “AI slop” or “AI Slop” that has already been presented in the form of images or videos. For some experts, many of these apps are mediocre, have been generated with little supervision and simply seek to monetize search niches. The strict terms of the App Store may be criticizable, but they are a kind of retaining wall that could flood the App Store with absolutely irrelevant apps. The App Store facing the dilemma. Forrester analyst Dipanjan Chatterjee indicated in Business Insider that “this is not a problem that Apple can get out of by rejecting apps. As AI accelerates the creation of applications, the company will have to evolve from artisanal surveillance to curation at scale.” Or what is the same: either Apple automates part of the process, or waiting times will continue to increase. The other option: tighten the entry criteria for apps created with AI so much that it disproportionately penalizes the developers who use these tools… of which there are more and more. Wanted vibecoder. What seemed like a hobby for hobbyists is becoming an increasingly striking economic ecosystem. According to Business Insiderplatforms like Lovable already publish job offers in which they are looking for “vibecoders professionals”, which seems to validate this new type of programmer, no matter how much the traditional market criticizes him. But. This avalanche of applications created with AI may be striking, but comments from professional developers usually agree on the same thing: these apps are more difficult to maintain in the long term. Even Linus Torvalds, who had partially fallen into the networks of AI, I warned him: “AI will be a tool, and it will make people more productive. I think vibe coding is great for getting people to start programming. I think (the code it generates) is going to be horrible to maintain… so I don’t think programmers will go away. You’ll still want to have people who know how to maintain the output.” Image | James Yarema In Xataka | Vibe coding wants to help Open Source. But developers don’t want AI botches

Is it the best time to buy a Poco F8 Ultra or should you wait? This is what the data tells us

Depending on how the price of the Poco F8 Ultra since its launch and seeing how its predecessor (the Poco F7 Ultra) in the market, this is how we evaluate whether or not to buy the F8 Ultra, in its 512 GB versionwhich is the one we have analyzed. 🟡 CAUTION (WAIT FOR OFFER) Poco F8 Ultra Verdict It is a mobile that has been on the market for a short time and can still be purchased almost at a launch price official RRP 899.99 euros (Xiaomi official store) Target price “on the street” Don’t pay more than 699 euros (Amazon in the 12 GB RAM version) Next release Next Poco F9 Ultra expected to launch in Q1 2027 according to rumors Our recommendation Wait if… If your current mobile still holds up and you are not looking for the bargain of the century, wait a few months (June/July), since the price of the Poco F8 Ultra will have stabilized and you will be able to get it cheaper. Regret cost Medium (about 100 euros). Normally, Poco lowers its terminals when they have been on the market for more than half a year. This means that if you buy it now, perhaps if you wait until summer (or even before), you can save about 100-150 euros. XIAOMI POCO F8 Ultra – 16+512GB Smartphone The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Why is the traffic light yellow? Although the Poco F7 Ultra started with a starting price much lower than that of the Poco F8 Ultra, it is true that its history serves to suggest that, currently, it is a favorable time for wait for it to go down. Specifically, we find ourselves in this situation: A relatively new mobile: With only about three months on the market, it is normal that the price of the Poco F8 Ultra remains stagnant. The ideal is to wait for it to go down, when it has been on the market for a little longer. Future purchase: Waiting means being patient and seeing the different offers that may come out for this mobile (we are aware of them and we will offer them to you). Think that if you wait, you will be able to save about 100-150 euros on purchasing the same mobile phone that you want now and it is money to invest in other accessories or, simply, to have it extra in your monthly budget. Expert Buyer Tip: That the Poco F8 Ultra is a knockout is something about which there is no doubt. Although buying it now for almost the same price as the original price is a financial mistake. If you hold out for a couple of months, you will be buying the same hardware for the real price it should be. Price history and change prediction The graph above compare the prices that the Poco F8 Ultra has had compared to its predecessor (the Poco F7 Ultra) over a year. These are the data that we get in key from this graph: The Poco F8 Ultra has had a aggressive debutpositioning itself significantly above the historical figure of the F7 Ultra (reaching 899.99 euros in month 8). While the previous model (F7 Ultra) maintained notable stability between 550 and 600 euros, the new flagship shows much greater volatility, with rapid corrections of 150 euros after price spikes. The current trend suggests that the F8 Ultra will seek to stabilize around 749.90 eurosa price floor that is still 36% above what its predecessor cost at the same point in the life cycle. If you are looking for the real ground, the prediction indicates that you will have to wait until the last quarter of the cycle to see figures close to 600 euros. The best Poco F8 Ultra deals now: Keep in mind that many of the offers we find are no longer available once we publish the item, either because they end or because stock runs out, so make sure before buying. Right now, we haven’t found very good deals for the Poco F8 Ultra (except in a few stores). XIAOMI POCO F8 Ultra – 16+512GB Smartphone The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Is the Poco F8 Ultra for you now? If you are not sure whether or not you should buy the Poco F8 Ultra, this is what I would take into account: ✅ BUY IT TODAY IF: You want to have the latest of the latest now and you can’t live without it Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 Not one more day and you don’t care about losing 100 euros in two months. ⛔ I DO NOT RECOMMEND IT IF: You budget is tightsince you are about to pay the price ceiling (749.90 euros) and you can wait a couple of months to have this Poco mobile. 💡 Good alternatives to the Poco F8 Ultra that I would buy If you still have doubts about buying (or not buying) the Poco F8 Ultra, these are some of the alternatives that I would take into account: Xiaomi 15T Pro: If you want a Xiaomi mobile, one of the perfect rivals from the same manufacturer for this Poco F8 Ultra is the Xiaomi 15T Prowhich you can buy in the brand’s official store from 799.99 euros. It is a mobile phone with cameras signed by Leica, 6.83-inch screen, MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ processor and 90 W charging. XIAOMI 15T Pro Gray 12GB RAM 512GB ROM The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Realme GT 8 Pro: for a similar price to the Poco F8 Ultra (709 euros specifically in PcComponentes) you can get this mobile with good value for money. He Realme GT 8 Pro It has a 6.79-inch 144Hz 2.K AMOLED display. It supports ultra-fast charging at 120W and comes with Snapdragon 8 Elite. Realme GT 8 Pro 5G 12GB 256GB 6.79″ Blue The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: This … Read more

Six chapters of ‘The Lord of the Rings’ have been waiting for an adaptation since Jackson’s films. The wait is over

Warner Bros. has announced that Stephen Colbert, host of ‘The Late Show’ and one of the most recognizable and relevant faces of entertainment in the United States (and also one of the greatest Tolkien experts in the world of entertainment), will co-write ‘The Lord of the Rings: Shadow of the Past’, the second of two new films in development for the franchise. He does it with his son, screenwriter Peter McGee, and veteran Philippa Boyens. The Middle Earth franchise is picking up speed again. A special partner. The announcement was made on March 25, traditionally known among fans as the Tolkien Reading Daywith Peter Jackson looking at the camera from what looked like a home video and promising “a very special partner”. That partner is Stephen Colbert, well-known presenter of the talk show ‘The Daily Show’ (which this year faces its final season). Warner Bros. and New Line Cinema have thus communicated that Colbert will co-write ‘The Lord of the Rings: Shadow of the Past’, the second of two new films in the franchise currently in development. What will count? Colbert identified years ago a hole in Jackson’s trilogy: the third to eighth chapters of ‘The Fellowship of the Ring’, from ‘Three’s Company’ to ‘Fog in the Barrows’, pages that the director never transferred to the screen in 2001. Within those chapters is Tom Bombadil, the Tolkien character whose absence in the original films became one of the fandom’s most persistent complaints. “I found myself reading those six chapters over and over again,” Colbert explained to Jackson in the video“thinking that maybe it could be his own story that fits into the larger one.” The official synopsis places the action fourteen years after Frodo’s death: Sam, Merry and Pippin retrace their steps, reliving the first moments of their adventure. Meanwhile, Sam’s daughter, Elanor, discovers a buried secret that nearly derailed the War of the Ring before it even began. It is a story that unites the past and present of the franchise and that, according to the synopsis, opens the door for actors from the original cast to reprise their roles with a narratively coherent age. More fronts. ‘Shadow of the Past’ will arrive after ‘The Hunt for Gollum‘, the film directed by Andy Serkis (player of Gollum in the original trilogy) and whose premiere is scheduled for December 17, 2027. Serkis returns to the character in a story located between the events of ‘The Hobbit’ and those of ‘The Fellowship of the Ring’, and filming has not yet started. It is not the only adaptation underway: Amazon continues with the third season of ‘The Rings of Power‘, and periodic re-releases are planned to celebrate anniversaries such as the 25 years of ‘The Fellowship of the Ring’. The corporate context. Another layer in the succession of ingredients that season this new adaptation. Paramount is acquiring Warner Bros. Discovery in a merger valued at approximately $111 billion, which is expected to take place before the fourth quarter of 2026. Colbert, ironically, leaves CBS (owned by Paramount) with his ‘The Daily Show’ to work with Warner Bros., the studio that that same corporate group will end up controlling. Colbert’s talent. Colbert’s participation in the script is not an empty promotional nod. The presenter’s relationship with Tolkien dates back decades: when he was a teenager he abandoned sports and schoolwork to read Tolkien systematically: not only ‘The Hobbit’ and ‘The Lord of the Rings’, but all of the author’s work. jackson said of him in 2012 that “I have never met a bigger Tolkienian fan in my life.” One of the many pieces of evidence he treasures: when Colbert visited the set of ‘The Hobbit’, Jackson organized a question and answer contest between him and Philippa Boyens, the screenwriter of the trilogy who will now co-write ‘Shadow of the Past’ with him. Colbert won. In 2013 he had a cameo in ‘The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug’ as a Lake City spy, along with his wife and children (including Peter McGee, co-writer of the new film). The following year he moderated the ‘The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies’ panel at the San Diego Comic-Con. completely disguised as the same character. In 2019 he directed the short film ‘Darrylgorn’, starring Ian McKellen, Viggo Mortensen and Elijah Wood. A stop as a start. The cancellation of ‘The Daily Show’ is what made the project possible. C.B.S. announced in July 2025 the closure of the programin the midst of tensions between Colbert and Paramount after the network’s agreement with Donald Trump to settle a lawsuit by the president with the program ’60 Minutes’, of which the presenter has always been very critical. The last episode is scheduled for May 21, 2026, closing eleven years at the helm of the title. Colbert acknowledged in the ad from the movie that “turns out I’m going to be free starting this summer.” In Xataka | A demographer has spent weeks solving a very important question: how many people lived in Tolkien’s Middle Earth

“The greatest obstacle in life is the wait for tomorrow and the loss of today”

Neither war, nor hunger, nor love. Nor hate, friendship or illness. If there is something that has really bothered us humans throughout the centuries, it is the passage of time. We all (from the richest to the most miserable) come into the world with our days scheduled. Sooner or later we run out of rope without anyone being able to prevent it. It’s that simple. In fact (and for cruel ironic as it may sound) that is one of the very few certainties that we can embrace during our existence, be it more or less extensive: there is no life without death. It’s nothing new. Centuries ago philosophers realized that, in a way, as our lives progress so does our death. If time is short must be valuable (just as happens with precious metals or gems) and everything valuable always brings a challenge. How the hell do you manage it? How to get the most out of it? What’s more, why try to get ‘the most out of it’? Are those who insist on making something of their time happier? useful and helpful Who do you see spending your days lying on the beach? Seneca to the rescue A few centuries ago, around the year 55 AD, there was a Latin philosopher (born in Cordubawhat is now Córdoba and then acted as the capital of Hispania Ulterior) who raised these same questions. His name was Lucius Anneeus Seneca and the answers he found were captured in works such as ‘De brevitate vitae’a text dedicated to a certain Paulino (his father-in-law or brother-in-law) in which he outlines a series of advice. One of the most famous can often be seen in the anthologies of aphorisms: “The biggest obstacle in life is the wait for tomorrow and the loss of today“. The phrase connects with the old maxim of tempus fugit (“time flies”), although there is more to it than may seem at first glance. In it, Seneca addresses one of the most complicated challenges for those who have set out to ensure that time does not slip through their fingers: the balance between the present and the future. A present that is our only certain reality and a tomorrow that will in turn be conditioned by what we do today. In other words, do we bet everything on the present or is it wiser to condition it with tomorrow in mind? They were interesting questions in Rome in the first century AD and they remain so today, twenty centuries later, in procrastination times in which the equation becomes even more complicated. At the end of the day, procrastinating is nothing more than setting traps in time management: deferring, postponing, delaying the moment in which we must carry out a task that (usually) will be beneficial for our future. Seneca’s starting point is as suggestive as it is challenging. Our time may be limited, but that doesn’t mean life is necessarily short. If it seems that way, it is because we ourselves favor it by facing it in the wrong way. And that doesn’t just happen by lying on the couch with your cell phone to kill the hours abandoned to the pleasure of the infinite scroll. For Seneca, the outlook is not much better if we obsess over tasks that make us believe that we do not have enough hours in the day, but in reality they are unimportant. “We don’t have a shortage of time, what happens is that we lose a lot. Life is long enough and to do the most important things it has been generously given to us, if all of it is used well.” “But if it is scattered in ostentation and carelessness, where it is not spent on anything good, when at last the inevitable final trance comes upon us, we realize that a life has passed that we did not know was happening.” “It is like this: we do not receive a short life, but rather we make it short“, concludes the Stoic thinker, who died in 65 AD, aged about 70. The complete reflection that Seneca dedicates to Paulinus and from which the phrase we previously cited about “the loss of today” is extracted is more devastating because it warns of how easy it is to give in to the mirage that we are taking advantage of time. Here we reproduce specifically the translation made by Francisco Socas Gavilán for the version of the Virtual Library of Andalusia. “Can there be anything more stupid than the attitude of some, I mean those men who presume to be far-sighted? They are engaged in too many tasks to be able to live better, they equip life by spending life, their thoughts direct them to the distance. But, of course, the greatest waste of life is procrastination: it cancels each day that is presented, it hides the present while promising what lies ahead.” “The greatest hindrance to living is the expectation that depends on tomorrow and loses what is today. You dispose of what is in the hands of luck, you abandon what is in yours. Where do you look? Where do you orient yourself? All future things remain uncertain: live immediately.” Seneca’s work resonates strongly twenty centuries later because, as remember Socasnot only tells us about death and the passage of time, but also about “life as a positive realization within a limited scope.” “Even though men can’t stop complaining about the brevity of lifethey alone are the real culprits of shortening it with their laziness and vices. “We waste time and do not consider it the greatest and only good,” duck. “The solution will be neither hyperactivity nor laziness, because those who are very busy, always thinking about tomorrow, do not take advantage of their time and are soon surprised by old age, while in idleness passions and amusements rob us of our intimate peace,” comments Socas after remembering Seneca’s words. “The idle fear death more. The busy will not be able to … Read more

We have been waiting for years for 8K TVs to take over the world. It is evident that we are going to sit and wait

In the 80s you guessed that Indiana Jones had a four-day beard, but that’s all. You couldn’t really see it, because on your VHS tapes it was more of a shadow than anything else. Those of us who have gray hair are lucky (or unlucky) to have lived in past times in which image resolution It was something arcane and mysterious. I was content with the video quality of the VHS tapes of ‘The Goonies’ or ‘Indiana Jones and the Lost Ark’ and I was happy with my C64 and its 320×200 pixels and those matches of ‘Match Day II’ with my brother in which we both enjoyed (and fought) as if we were playing the last game. FIFA EA Sports FC. Then, of course, everything improved and we began to realize that the resolution was important. We discovered that DVDs and their 720×576 resolution (in the PAL system used in Spain, in the US the NTSC only reached 720 x480) was like seeing the future until that future became the past with the arrival of HD Ready (720p) and especially Full HD (1080p) resolutions. Suddenly it was absolutely obvious that Harrison Ford hadn’t shaved.

A group of Spanish pilots wait in front of Russia for an alarm that will sound 500 times in 2025. They only have 15 minutes to launch their fighters

A few minutes from Russian airspace, a handful of Spanish pilots live in the most tense routine that exists in peacetime: be ready to take off at any moment from an icy base from the Balticone where the sky is watched as if each blip on the radar could be the start of something bigger. Fifteen minutes. At Šiauliai, a Lithuanian air base that functions as first line of surveillance over the Baltic, the routine can be broken at any second with a siren and a countdown. When the alert goes off (in 2025 alone it did so up to 500 times), the Spanish pilots of the 15th Wing They put on their equipment, get into the vans and run towards the hangars with a single objective: to be in the air in less than fifteen minutes. It is a millimetric mechanic, repeated so many times in training that becomes automaticbecause the mission does not wait for anyone and because in that area an unidentified plane, without a transponder or without communication, can be the beginning of a serious incident. The shadow of an enemy. The function of these quick exits, called “scrambles”is to intercept and escort suspicious aircraft until they leave Allied space or their intentions become clear, and in the Baltic they are almost an everyday language. The route is especially sensitive because it connects Russia with the militarized enclave of Kaliningradand there intersect fighters, surveillance planes and traffic that sometimes fly without a flight plan or without the expected signals. The result is constant tension: some days there are several outings and other weeks everything seems calm, but the feeling is always the same, that the next warning can come when you are resting or half asleep. 15th Wing Fighter Mission since 2004. NATO started this baltic air police in 2004 to protect the space of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, and since then the countries have taken turns in rotation four months so that the umbrella is permanent. Over time, the deployment was expanded to other bases in the region, first after the first Russian invasion of Ukraine and later with further expansion, because the Eastern Front ceased to be a theoretical concept. In recent months, furthermore, the incursions became more disturbing due to a new detail: not only manned aircraft appeared, but also drones that crossed borders and forced us to react quickly. Spain and the fighters. The Spanish contingent arrived in December with more than 200 troops and eleven EF-18Ma modernized version of the Hornet that Spain operates and maintains ready to fly day or night. The planes are armed with air-to-air missiles and the pilots train with night vision goggles, because surveillance does not stop when the sun goes down. Behind each exit there is a system that monitors the sky relentlessly, control centers that detect traces on the radar and a decision chain that, when activated, turns the entire base into a fast, silent and perfectly rehearsed choreography. Drones change the script. The big twist is that now the problem is not only the classic military plane that approaches without identifying itself, but the emergence of cheap dronesslow, low and erratic, more difficult to classify and more complicated to stop with means designed for another era. It we have counted. In September last year, a wave of Russian drones penetrated Polish airspace during an attack on Ukraine, and then there were similar episodess that forced the activation of fighter jets in countries like Romania. In parallel, small unidentified drones began to be seen near airports, bases and sensitive facilities throughout Europe, fueling the feeling of vulnerability and suspect that someone is measuring response times and blind spots. Crow, the anti-drone. For this reason, in this deployment the 15th Wing arrived with a historical novelty for them: the Indra Crow systeman anti-drone defense that adds a different layer of protection to the base and its surroundings. Crow combines radars, cameras and sensors to detect small aircraft and, once located, attempts to take them down using signal jamming, that is, electronic warfare from fixed or mobile positions. Its range not only protects planes and runways, it also covers the nearby city, because the real goal is to shield critical infrastructure and reduce the risk of a cheap drone causing disproportionate damage. The cost dilemma. Behind this adaptation is a problem that NATO is being forced to solve at full speed: intercepting cheap drones with weapons designed to shoot down fighters is an unsustainable equation. Firing expensive missiles from a fighter jet to take down a small aircraft may work, but it turns every defense in a waste and opens the door to volume saturation. That is why procedures and tactics are being reviewed, looking for cheaper and more specific systems, and assuming that the fighter will no longer always be the best tool to put out the fire. The strategic signal. The arrival of fighters with anti-drone protection It reflects a Europe that begins to fortify the sky as if war were already knocking at the door, although it has not yet fully crossed. In the Baltic, each rotation is a political and military message: there is presence, there is a response and there is an intention to fill gaps that did not exist before. Thus, what was previously an almost routine escort and identification mission is becoming a comprehensive defense exercise against hybrid threatswhere the enemy can be a large plane, a tiny drone or a provocation designed solely to check if, when the alarm sounds, there is really someone capable of taking off in those fifteen minutes. Image | Pexels, Pavel Vanka In Xataka | There are “invisible” Russian submarines happily sailing through the Baltic and that has led Europe to unprecedented measures In Xataka | A Russian submarine has appeared off the coast of France. And Europe’s reaction has been surprising: have a laugh

We will have to wait to test the future with the Meta Ray-Ban Display outside the US: they are being victims of their own success

The Meta Ray-Ban Display are not perfect glasses nor do they pretend to be, but it’s hard not to feel that there is something different here. The idea of ​​having a color screen integrated into the lens, with speakers, microphones, cameras and even artificial intelligence, continues to sound more like a prototype than an everyday product. And yet, it is happening. Faced with other attempts to “kill” the smartphone that fell by the wayside, such as the AI Pinthese glasses aim for something more subtle. Screen on the lens, bracelet on the wrist. Beyond the concept, the Meta Ray-Ban Display is based on an unusual combination. The information appears on a small color screen located outside the axis of vision, designed for brief and non-continuous consultations. The control is not done by touching the glasses, but through the Meta Neural Banda bracelet that interprets muscle signals in the wrist area to execute minimal gestures. Meta presents this system as a more natural way to interact, reducing the need for buttons, touch surfaces or visible commands. Overwhelmed demand, expansion on pause. As explained this Tuesday by the companythe volume of interest has far exceeded the available inventory, to the point of generating waiting lists that extend well into 2026. Given this scenario, Meta has chosen to freeze the international deployment that it had planned in the short term and focus all its efforts on fulfilling orders already placed in the United States, while reviewing its availability strategy. This stoppage directly affects the plans communicated months ago. The company had indicated that the Ray-Ban Display would arrive in early 2026 in markets such as the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Canada, a first wave outside the United States that is now on hold. Meta does not speak of cancellation or set new dates, a prudent position that confirms the immediate stop, but does not clarify how long it will be extended. {“videoId”:”x9qouiu”,”autoplay”:false,”title”:”Ray-Ban Meta (Gen 2)”, “tag”:”Meta”, “duration”:”134″} Does the queue get longer here too? Although Spain was not in that first group of countries, the slowdown has obvious consequences for this side of the map. In launches of this type, expansion usually proceeds in waves, starting with the United States and continuing, in some cases, through key markets. In this case, Meta never confirmed plans for Spain, neither for this first generation nor for possible subsequent ones. The only thing that can be stated is that, if at some point these glasses end up reaching this market, the international delay makes it reasonable to think of an even longer wait. In Xataka Meta is so serious about smart glasses that its catalog is already a mess: this is how the new models differentiate themselves News for the Meta Ray-Ban Display. The stoppage in expansion has not prevented Meta from continuing to show progress. During CES, the company presented new functions designed to expand the uses of glasses, as a teleprompter mode to read prepared texts or possibility of writing messages by drawing letters with your finger on any surface, which are then transcribed into digital format. They are improvements that reinforce the idea of ​​a product in continuous evolution, even when its availability remains limited by supply and inventory. Images | Goal In Xataka | Two weeks with the Oakley Meta. Technically impressive, but in no man’s land (function() { window._JS_MODULES = window._JS_MODULES || {}; var headElement = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)(0); if (_JS_MODULES.instagram) { var instagramScript = document.createElement(‘script’); instagramScript.src=”https://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js”; instagramScript.async = true; instagramScript.defer = true; headElement.appendChild(instagramScript); – The news We will have to wait to test the future with the Meta Ray-Ban Display outside the US: they are being victims of their own success was originally published in Xataka by Javier Marquez .

If it seems expensive to change the battery in an electric car, wait until you see what it costs in a Ferrari LaFerrari: more than 200,000 euros

For the majority of mortals, considering costs such as consumption or maintenance are a must when purchasing a car. And if we talk about buy an electric carAlthough the maintenance is less, there is one operation that makes the difference: changing the battery. Depending on the brand and model, prices vary. between 4,000 and more than 30,000 euros. That’s for EV cars, but those of hybrids They are not exactly cheap either. But there are cars and cars and obviously, The Ferrari LaFerrari plays in another league. The firm’s first hybrid hypercar offers performance typical of its range: it is capable of going from 0 to 100 km/h in 2.9 seconds and exceeds 350 km/h thanks to its 963 HP. But no matter how Ferrari it is, it does not escape suffering from the weak point common to hybrid technologies: the battery. If we take into account that there are only 499 examples of the Ferrari LaFerrari and that each one was launched with a base RRP of 1.3 million euros (over time, it has gotten worse: it is around four million on the second hand market), the price of its battery is not far behind: exceeds 200,000 euros. Ferrari’s lucrative solution: replace the entire battery With just 1,440 kilometers traveled, one of the few and exclusive owners of a 2014 Ferrari LaFerrari in Croatia discovered how his precious car ran out of traction battery. The first diagnosis indicated that the hybrid battery was out of service. The solution proposed by Ferrari was to replace the entire battery pack at a reasonable price: from 213,000 euroswithout counting on labor. So the owner decided to explore other more economical options, arriving until EV Clinica Croatian workshop specializing in electric and hybrid vehicle batteries. After an exhaustive analysis of the state of that group of batteries, with 120 cells and weighing about 60 kilos, they identified two failures: defective cells and a defect in the manufacturing assembly. Good news. The battery was not a brick, but had a localized fault that could be fixed without having to perform a complete replacement. Although the price of this meticulous and precision work has not been released, the owner had his LaFerrari back saving the price of the entire package. What of ask for quotes from other workshops It is always a good idea, whether you have a Dacia Sandero or a Ferrari. And if they don’t tell the owner of this Bugatti Veyronfrom whom the company asked him for 11,000 euros to change the button for the electric adjustment of the rearview mirror when the workshop in his town did it for less than two euros. Fortunately for those who own a hybrid Ferrari, last year the Italian firm launched an additional guarantee extension, so it will replace the traction batteries of the cars covered in this service in years 8 and 16 of their life. In Xataka | China has discovered another front to elevate its electric car: competing face to face against Ferrari and Lamborghini In Xataka | They are founders and ultra-rich, but they have not always driven luxury supercars: a review of the cars of tech millionaires Cover | Ferrari, EV Clinic

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.