costs

Amazon sells off this iPhone with the best price we have seen to date: it costs 504 euros

by

Except the iPhone AirApple’s current generation mobile phones have changed very little in price since their respective launches. On the other hand, we do usually find those from the previous generation on sale, and quite frequently. The best one we can find right now has fallen into the iPhone 16ea mobile phone that, although it is true that it is not the most recent, is perfect for making the leap into the Apple ecosystem. Its price on Amazon is 504 euros. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links A new minimum price With Amazon’s new offer, we are talking about a new historical minimum price. He iPhone 16e It will not be Apple’s most complete mobile because it has certain shortcomings, but it is quite attractive. Starting with its design, we are talking about a compact mobile with 6.1 inch screenthe smallest of all considering that, except for the iPhone 17eApple mobile phones are starting from 6.3 inches. It is also a mobile phone that offers good power thanks to the A18 chipthe same one that integrates the iPhone 16. This chip, in addition to offering good performance, adds compatibility with Apple Intelligence. And your software will also be updated for many years. On the other hand, it is worth mentioning that its battery offers one of the best autonomy that we have seen in iPhone with this size, reaching the day without any problem with very demanding use. ⚡ IN SUMMARY: iPhone 16e offer today ✅ THE BEST Yesu format and power: We are talking about a small mobile phone, but also powerful. Your battery: whether you use it a lot or little, the battery will last you at least a day without any problem. ❌ THE WORST los 128 GB… They remain very tight today. With wireless charging, but… no MagSafe support. To use these accessories it is necessary to have a compatible case. 💡 BUY IT IF… You are looking for the first iPhone, especially if you don’t want to spend too much money and are looking to prioritize the battery. ⛔ DON’T BUY IT IF… You are going to take a lot of photographs and you do not have cloud services, since 128 GB is enough for what it gives, which is not much. You may also be interested ESR Case for iPhone 17e/ iPhone 16e, MagSafe Compatible, Military Grade Shockproof Protection, Magnetic Case for iPhone 17e/ iPhone 16e, Classic Hybrid Case (HaloLock), Transparent The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Spigen Glas.tR EZ Fit Screen Protector for iPhone 17e, iPhone 16e, iPhone 14, iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Pro, 2 Units, High Definition, 9H Hardness The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Ricardo AguilarApple In Xataka | Best iPhones. Which one to buy in 2026 and recommended models based on budget, tastes and quality-price In Xataka | After testing them, Xataka experts agree: these are the best mobile phones of 2026

It is charged by the sun and costs less than 100,000 pesos

by

Mexico has just joined in this affordable electric mobility. And the company TT Automotive presented the TT01 a few days agoalso named “Totally Tlaxcalteca”, a small electric and solar vehicle manufactured almost entirely in the state of Tlaxcala. The meeting was at Hacienda Soltepec, in the municipality of Huamantla, where businessmen, state and federal authorities, and representatives of the automobile sector attended. It is the pride of the region, since the project boasts that around 80% of its components are of national origin. We tell you everything in detail. Why is it important. The TT01 is proposed as one of the cheapest electric cars that can be found today in Mexico. According to the brand, its price part of the 99,000 pesos (about 5,000 euros to change) and goes up to 160,000 pesos in its most equipped versions. That entry figure places it even below Oliniathe electric car project promoted by the federal government of Claudia Sheinbaum, which has not yet reached the market. So basically the company has preempted the state initiative. Simple and without airbags. The TT01 stands out from the rest of the urban electric cars in that it uses a charging system using solar panels integrated into the roof. According to their creator, Edgar Guzmán Carreto, founder of TT Automotive, these panels generate up to 50 kilometers of autonomy after eight hours of exposure to the sun. The car can also be plugged into any conventional household outlet. The company talks about a total autonomy of up to 250 kilometers per charge, a maximum speed of 50 km/h (little, but designed especially for the city and short trips), capacity for five passengers and a body with a high-strength steel structure. The Herald of Mexico itself says that this first model incorporates very very basic security measures. And because it doesn’t have, it doesn’t even have airbags. Between the lines. In the presentation, Guzmán Carreto counted that TT Automotive was born “not only as a company, but as a declaration of principles”, with the idea of ​​putting technology at the service of people. The approach is to have a cheap car ready, manufactured locally and aimed at families, delivery people and neighborhood transportation. The assembly is carried out in the Xiloxoxtla Industrial Park, which, according to those responsible, should generate employment and strengthen the supplier chain in the area. Pay attention to the nuances. The TT01 that was shown in Huamantla is still a prototype, and there are details that deserve our attention. On the one hand, the vehicle can also be recharged with gasoline in the event of possible unforeseen events. On the other hand, the company itself recognizes that it is still looking for investors to be able to manufacture on a large scale. Guzmán Carreto estimates that in about six months they would be able to produce in series, with an initial goal of 20 units per week and first sales through its website. It is worth remembering the history of delays of the project, since it was first announced in September 2025 with the promise of going on sale in December of the same year, and in the end it was postponed until it was officially presented a few days ago. And now what. The company also works in other variants with greater speed and pricewith versions for personal, family and distribution use, according to pv magazine. Now we need to know if TT Automotive meets the deadlines, since if so it would be ahead of Olinia’s proposal. It remains to be seen whether this type of vehicle, so special and with very basic security systems, will arouse interest in the region. Cover image | Automotive Mexico News In Xataka | Mexico has a brutal potential for solar energy: at the moment it has begun to exploit it with agrovoltaics

We know exactly what AI costs, but we are unable to measure what it produces. And that is a serious problem

by

We know very well the cost of developing AI: mammoth data centershe electricity consumption skyrocketedhe tech capex through the roof… The problem is that it seems that all this is not having a return, or not enough to justify tremendous investment. The fear of the bubble is justified, but maybe we were wrong and the problem is another: that our measuring tape is broken. The hidden production. In an extensive and in-depth analysis in the newsletter Semianalisysuse the term ‘dark output’ in reference to the economic value that AI is generating, but which current measurement systems do not see well and therefore does not have an impact on GDP. This hidden production has two aspects: Hidden production by substitution: These are jobs that used to be done by a human for a price and that can now be done by AI for a fraction of that cost. There is a very graphic example with the writing of wills, a job that historically cost $400, which had dropped to $150, and in a single year AI has plummeted to $0.50. The work is done, but the economic transaction disappears from the data. New production that remains hidden: On the other side are the jobs that were not done because they were too expensive, but that AI has made so cheap that they can now be done. The example that Semianalysis provides are the bibliographic reviews whose price was up to $2,000 and that made them a very exclusive service. Now with AI you can do one of these reviews on all types of projects. The problem is that the economic trace is non-existent, except for the use of tokens or payment of subscriptions. Why it is important. The thesis of the analysis is that we are not facing a bubble, but that we are not measuring well the return that AI is producing and that is a problem that goes far beyond a simple statistical debate. Macroeconomic data is the metric by which investors detect real growth, central banks adjust interest rates, and companies decide whether to hire or automate. Making decisions of this caliber based on inaccurate data can have serious consequences. The difficulty of measuring it. Services and intellectual labor are much more complicated to measure than physical goods. It is very easy for a furniture factory to measure whether new machinery allows it to manufacture more chairs in less time. AI is helping to do tasks such as programming, writing documents, summarizing them or creating briefings and the way we measure it is the tokens consumed. The problem is that consuming more tokens can result in enormous benefits for the company, but they can also produce bad code and bad summaries. The value is in the production, in the output, not in what we spend to get to it. Precedents. Something similar happened during the computer boom in the 80s and 90s. At this time, macroeconomic data were not capable of detecting what the computer revolution was bringing. The solution did not arrive until 2013, when R&D and investment in intellectual property were included in GDP accounting. The result was that 3.6 trillion dollars were added retroactively, showing that in the year 2000 alone it represented 30% of the GDP. The other precedent is the so-called care economy, in reference to all the domestic and care work carried out mainly by women without receiving remuneration. The International Labor Organization estimated in 2018 that 16.4 billion hours of unpaid care work were performed, which would be equivalent to 11 trillion dollars or 9% of global GDP. Yes, but. That it is necessary to update our measuring tape does not detract from the fact that investment in AI infrastructure is truly dizzying. In 2025, big tech companies will invest $410 billion in AI and in 2026 the plan is to exceed the 650 billion dollars. The chief economist of Golman Sachs said that the contribution of all this crazy investment to US GDP was “basically zero.” In this sense, it is as risky to say that we are facing a bubble about to burst due to excess spending, as it is to assume that there is immense invisible wealth justifying every dollar invested. Image | Xataka with Gemini In Xataka | “The biggest mistake of all time”: Bill Gates let slip 400 billion when Microsoft didn’t buy Android

If you thought the blue zone in your city was expensive, wait until you see what it costs to moor a yacht at the Formula 1 GP in Monaco

by

The Monaco Grand Prix is, by far, the most glamorous career of the Formula 1 World Championship. Not so much because of the fact that each of its curves keeps a memory of the most successful drivers, but because of the enormous showcase of luxury and opulence when celebrating with one of the most exclusive ports in the world. Not everyone can access the most exclusive spaces at the Monaco GP. Beyond the VIP stands, the real epicenter of luxury It is on the yachts moored in front of the circuit. The mooring of a superyacht during that weekend costs a real fortune, only affordable for the richest in the world. In fact, not even the world’s great fortunes, such as Jeff Bezos, They have a guaranteed position among the privileged few who can afford to watch the race of Formula 1 from the deck of your superyacht. Three million for a front row seat During the week of the Grand Prix, Port Hercule stops being a normal port and becomes a meeting point for the greatest fortunes on the planet and their yachts. Whether you like Formula 1 or not is secondary. The week before the Grand Prix, the parade of enormous superyachts begins, such as the Symphony by Bernard Arnault, founder of LVMH, who take positions highlighted in the Monegasque port. The specialized medium Yacht Harbor estimated that the 2017 test brought together yachts valued at more than 2,000 million euros in Port Hercule. Kismet superyacht, 122 meters long However, not having your own yacht is no excuse for not enjoying a front row seat at sea to enjoy the only Championship race that can be seen from the deck of a luxurious superyacht. Yacht rentals during the race test week skyrocket. The portal of boat rental luxury Cecil Wright offers those types of services and allows you to rent the Kismeta true floating mansion for the modest price of three million euros for one week. While on the streets of Monte Carlo the single-seater engines make the most of their performance, inside the Kismet Up to 12 guests can be accommodated in eight suites. The yacht is equipped with every detail so that guests only have to relax in its Balinese-inspired spa, which includes a hammam, sauna and cryotherapy chamber, waterfall shower and chromotherapy bathtub, gym and yoga studio. One of the covers of Kismet In addition, it allows you to experience all the excitement of the race from any of the jacuzzis on its luxurious decks, and all of this is attended by a crew of 36 people. “Parking” at a Monaco GP Once you have rented the right superyacht to blend in with billionaires and royalty, all that remains is to find a mooring for the yacht. Kismet. Port Hercule is the only port with adequate depth for mooring superyachts of that category. This port offers about 700 berths, but the most sought-after place is the so-called Trackside Zone, where the boats are located next to Quai des États-Unis, Quai Jarlan and the first two positions of Quai U. That is, in the mooring line closest to the circuitwhere the single-seaters pass just a few meters from these yachts. According to the table of Port of Monaco ratesthe price of the mooring is calculated based on how close it is to the runway and the length of the superyacht. Docking a yacht in the port of Monaco during the race ranges from 5,668 euros for a yacht of less than 19 meters in the Port of Fontvieille area, the furthest and without vision of the track, to tripling its price as we get closer to the track, with a mooring price of 16,087 euros for the same 19-meter yacht. Mooring Zone 1 is at the end of the tunnel straight, just when the cars must brake. Passing mooring zone 2, from which you can see the chicane of the Pool areato the Trackside Zone (zone 1) implies a price increase of 25.7%. During the Monaco Grand Prix, mooring a superyacht like the Kismet122 meters long, in the Trackside Zone (zone 1) It can cost around 160,000 euros only for docking during Grand Prix week. Its high price is justified because its proximity turns the Trackside Zone into a kind of floating stand. The yachts are in front of one of the most recognizable parts of the track, right where the cars leave the tunnel and launch towards the Nouvelle Chicane area, one of the classic images of the Monaco Grand Prix. It is a point where the drivers must reduce their speed to follow the curve and face the Pool section, so the millionaires see them pass at a slower speed and the single-seaters can be seen in more detail. Without a doubt, the most millionaire form of watch a formula 1 race. In Xataka | Madrid has been fighting for its F1 Grand Prix for years. Ozempic’s rich heirs also want a Grand Prix in their town Image | Flickr (CaterhamF1)

The Steam Deck OLED went on the market for 569 euros. Three years later it costs 35% more for an obvious reason

by

Since the Steam Deck is in stores, we are witnessing the most hardware era from Valve in many years. And of course, entering this swamp has its pluses and minuses. After months of irregular availability, Valve’s portable console is returning to the shelves. The problem is that it has done so with a considerable price increase: more than 40% in both models. It is another example that today, being an early adopter pays off. what has happened. Valve has updated the prices of the Steam Deck OLEDits only range since it retired the LCD model half a year ago. The 512 GB model goes from 569 to 779 euros, while the 1 TB model goes up from 679 to 919 euros. They are 210 and 240 euros more expensive, respectively. In the United States the rise is even more prominent, increasing its cost by more than 40%. If there is any good news that we can get from this, it is that both models are once again available to buy on Steam after a long season of intermittent stock. Valve’s justification. The company has in a brief official statement that “these new prices reflect the current state of component costs and other global logistics challenges across the industry.” That is, you pay more for exactly the same device that existed a few months ago. The real culprit: RAM. Behind all this is rising memory prices. The cost of RAM has skyrocketed in recent months due to the enormous demand from large technology companies, which They are building data centers for their artificial intelligence projects at a frenetic pace. This has led to widespread memory and storage shortages affecting the entire industry. It is not an isolated case. Valve is the latest manufacturer to join a worrying trend. nintendo recently announced a price increase for the Switch 2citing precisely the “recent rebound in the prices of memory and other components.” sony It has also gone through several climbs price since the release of PS5 and Microsoft He has also done the same with Xbox Series on more than one occasion. The outlook, in general, is complicated. And it is that according to Circana datathe average price of new hardware in the United States has gone from $235 in November 2019 to $439 in November 2025. That the 1 TB Steam Deck now costs more than a PS5 Pro It’s pretty crazy. What this changes. The Steam Deck was born as a clever cheap gateway to the portable gaming PC, an alternative that has even ended casting doubt on the future viability of gaming on Windows. With this increase, it is no longer that economical option, especially since there is no longer an LCD model. And now, with the most expensive base model, the Nintendo Switch 2 curiously becomes the cheapest alternative for those looking for a portable console, despite its recent price increase and all. And now what. After the rise, now what everyone wants to know is what will happen to the price of the Steam Machine and the Steam Framehardware that Valve intends to launch this year. The company finds itself in a complicated situation in this regard, especially in a context of supply problems. At the time, those responsible for the console they said that it would cost something “more in line with what could be expected from the current PC market.” Given what we have seen with the Steam Deck, now we have more doubts than ever. In Xataka | Project Helix is ​​the new Xbox machine and the warning is clear: it is not going to be cheap

If the question is how to deflect projectiles without skyrocketing military costs, China has found the solution: crocodiles

by

In recent years, the US military has even tested fibers inspired in spider silk for future bulletproof vests. The reason was simple: some natural materials achieve absorb impacts and deform better than many modern artificial compounds. The idea of ​​using animals. The search for more effective shielding has been inspired by natural solutions for decades. Since the Second World War, different armies have studied biological structures capable of absorbing impacts, distribute energy or resist attacks better than expected. China has just joined this tradition with a peculiar proposal: armor inspired by the crocodile scales. The logic behind the project is simple. Instead of relying solely on making armor thicker, heavier and more expensive, researchers are trying to modify the way projectiles hit the surface to force them to deflect, lose stability and fragment before passing through. How it works. The Ningbo University team replaced the traditional hexagonal plates used in many armors composed of small rhomboidal ceramic pieces placed at 45 degree angles. The arrangement imitates the irregular, overlapping structure of crocodile scales. During testing, the design was able to more effectively reduce the residual velocity of hardened steel projectiles and increase fragmentation of the ammunition upon impact. The objective is not only to withstand the shot, but to alter the physical behavior of the projectile at the moment of contact so that part of its energy is lost before reaching the main armor. The obsession with reducing costs. The most relevant thing about the project is not only the additional protection, but the attempt to make it cheaper. Chinese researchers they insist in that any structural improvement that allows the same materials to be used with better results can greatly reduce the manufacturing cost. There is no doubt, this obsession makes a lot of sense in modern warfare. Shielding vehicles, helicopters or troops against increasingly powerful ammunition requires enormous amounts of advanced materials and gigantic budgets. From that perspective, if a relatively simple geometric modification achieves better results without increasing weight or industrial complexity, the economic impact can be enormous on a large scale. Logic born of recent wars. If you like, the Chinese research also reflects a broader change that is already seen in Ukraine and other recent conflicts: it is increasingly important economic efficiency of weapons and defenses. For years, military innovation was dominated by extremely sophisticated and expensive systems. Now many countries are looking for solutions that are sufficiently effective, easy to manufacture and sustainable in long wars. In this sense, Russia already demonstrated how relatively simple glider bombs could cause enormous problems at low cost. Ukraine responded with cheap drones capable of destroying much more expensive equipment. The shielding crocodile inspired fits perfectly into this new logic: trying to unbalance the relationship between cost and effectiveness without having to resort to futuristic technologies that are impossible to mass produce. Future battlefields. For now, the Chinese system remains in the experimental phase and still needs much more demanding tests, including multiple impacts and firing from different angles. Still, researchers believe it could end up being used in armored vehicles, helicopters, ships and even light aerospace structures. What is interesting is that China does not present the project as a spectacular technological revolution, but rather as a pragmatic improvement based on simple principles. geometry and materials. An idea that pretty well sums up where part of current military innovation is heading: less obsession with creating impossible weapons and more interest in find smart ways and relatively cheap to survive in an environment where each projectile and each armor cost more and more money. Image | David Shackelford, PXHere, Unsplash In Xataka | China is manufacturing missiles at an unprecedented speed. And the final objective is not Taiwan, it is another island 3,000 km away In Xataka | China has made a science fiction dream come true: an electromagnetic cannon capable of reaching 3,000 shots per minute

This is the new Xiaomi pack that costs just over 750 euros

by

From time to time Xiaomi launches the odd pack that brings together several of its devices, and normally these packs are usually on sale. This week the brand has returned to the fray, launching one of the best combos we have seen to date: it includes two televisions and a Bluetooth speaker for a price of 769 euros. This is what the pack includes: Xiaomi TV F Pro 2026 (32 inches) Xiaomi TV F Pro 2026 (75 inches) Xiaomi Bluetooth Speaker. Xiaomi TV F Pro 2026 (75 inches) + Xiaomi TV F Pro 2026 (32 inches) + Xiaomi Bluetooth Speaker The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Two TVs and a Bluetooth speaker The 32 and 75-inch Xiaomi televisions are from the “F” line, which means that they are essentially the “A Pro”, but with the Fire TV operating system instead of Google TV. In this way, they have Alexa integrated and the menu is the same as what we find in the Fire TV Stick from Amazon. Both televisions offer 4K resolution and are compatible with the image format HDR10+. It incorporates a panel with QLED technology and its refresh rate reaches 120 Hz in Game Boost mode via HDMI, which are two ideal features if you are looking for a television for gaming. In addition, its speakers are compatible with Dolby Audio and it has a reduced blue light mode to protect eyesight. On the other hand, the Xiaomi Bluetooth Speaker It is not a speaker that is intended for use with the television, but with other devices such as smartphones. It stands out mainly for having Harman AudioEFX audio software, it is resistant to both water and dust (IP67) and its theoretical autonomy reaches 17 hours of use. ⚡ IN SUMMARY: Xiaomi pack offer today ✅ THE BEST 3 x 1: We are talking about a pack that includes three devices, the most interesting being the TVs. The TVs: The two TVs have a QLED panel, and one of them has a 75-inch diagonal. ❌ THE WORST The Bluetooth speaker: As it is a pack with two televisions, it is missing that instead of a speaker it included a sound bar to make the pack more rounded. 💡 BUY IT IF… You want to renew a couple of televisions, whether for the living room and kitchen, bedroom or a second residence. In addition, they are especially interesting for their gaming-oriented features. ⛔ DON’T BUY IT IF… You only need a television or are you looking for a different experience than what QLED televisions offer, which are more oriented toward gaming and not so much toward sports or movies. You may also be interested Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Plus, compatible with Wi-Fi 6, Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos and HDR10+ The price could vary. We earn commission from these links XIAOMI Soundbar Pro 2.1ch-300W TV Sound Bar with Powerful Bass and External Wireless Subwoofer. Compatible with Dolby Audio™ and DTS Virtual:X. HDMI ARC/Optical/Coaxial/Bluetooth Connections The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Xiaomi In Xataka | Best home theater projectors. Which one to buy and five recommended models from 299 to 18,000 euros In Xataka | Mega-guide to set up a home theater: projector, screen, sound system and more

GitHub Copilot and Claude are putting more and more fees and costs

by

As end users, pay a monthly fee to use a AI model It is the norm to access more complete and powerful models. However, developers who rely on an AI model to power their tool or application pay based on the tokens of input and output that are consumed (the minimum unit of text that a model processes when we use it, so that we understand each other). Which has announced GitHub Copilot has more to it than it seems, as it will now begin charging end users through a monthly plan based on the number of tokens. And this has set off alarm bells in the sector, because it could be a move that any other company could easily end up imitating. And all in a context in which Chinese startups prices continue to drop sharply in their models. Copilot can no longer maintain its business model. GitHub has announced that starting June 1 it will stop accepting requests for its current premium plans and will begin billing for AI credits instead. Each monthly plan will include a number of credits equivalent to the price of the subscription: anyone who pays $10 per month for Copilot Pro will receive $10 in credits. From there, consumption is measured in tokens, including input, output, and cache tokens. It is a play similar to when we use a image generation model either video: a use that depends on credits and that we recharge depending on the use. The reason for the change, according to the companyis that until now a quick consultation and an autonomous programming session of several hours cost the user the same. GitHub claims to have long absorbed that cost difference, but acknowledges that the model is no longer viable. QWhat exactly changes. The base prices of the plans are not touched: Copilot Pro is still at $10. Business in 19. Enterprise in 39. But: what you buy with them is no longer the same. Previously, the limit was a number of requests. Now, each interaction with the model consumes credits at a rate that depends on the chosen model and the volume of tokens. According to the rates published by the company itself, the most advanced OpenAI models can cost up to $30 per million output tokens. On the other hand, an agentic session, where the assistant executes tasks autonomously, can easily multiply the expense of a week of normal consultations. Ed Zitron, well-known critic and technology expert, counted that, according to internal documents to which he had access, Copilot’s weekly costs had almost doubled since January, coinciding with the boom in agentic assistants. Nor is it just Copilot. According to account The Information, Anthropic has begun charging its large enterprise customers the actual cost of computing Claudeabandoning any discount. Anthropic itself briefly tested the elimination of Claude Code of its $20 per month Pro plan. Large AI companies have been taking losses on their subscription models to attract users for some time, and are now trying to pass on the real costs to those who consume the most. China does the opposite. While the West adjusts prices upwards, several of the main Chinese technology companies have adopted a completely different strategy: turning tokens into a cheap commodity, almost like a telecom distributing mobile data. DeepSeek announced this week a 90% reduction in the price of cached accesses to its API (when the model reuses already processed context), bringing the minimum entry cost to about $0.14 per million tokens. For your most advanced model, DeepSeek-V4-Prothe figure becomes 32 times cheaper per conversation than the equivalent in GPT-5.5 from OpenAI, according to company data. Alibaba, for its part, has just separated its AI business and renamed it Token Hub Business Group, making clear what its strategic commitment is. According to share According to Reuters, Chinese models cost on average one-sixth the price per token of those from OpenAI, Anthropic, and the like. Why it can work, and why it has a limit. China’s advantage in inference (the moment at which a model responds to a request) rests on cheaper electricity, software efficiency that it has had no choice but to forcefully develop by chip restrictions from Washington, and a super competitive domestic race that forces prices to constantly drop. Token consumption in China has gone from 100 billion a day at the end of 2025 to 140 billion in March 2026, according to estimates collected by Reuters. However, as the media points out, this strategy has an underlying problem: the tokens are not interchangeable. One million tokens from Anthropic’s most advanced system are worth much more than the same volume processed by an inferior model. Companies that delegate complex tasks to AI agents will end up paying for quality, not just volume. And there, the Chinese models continue to lag behind the most advanced Western ones. Cover image | Alexander Mils and Roman Synkevych In Xataka | Anthropic decided to resist pressure from the Pentagon. Since then all other technologies have folded

This MiniLED TV with 144 Hz now costs less than 400 euros

by

Until recently, if you wanted to enjoy an authentic cinema experience, you had to prepare your wallet to pay for an OLED or MiniLED panel for more than 1,000 euros. Although this is something that demystifies Hisense with your television 55E8Qwith a combination of MiniLED and Quantum Dot technology and a sound system that exceeds the standard. Now, you can get this TV on Amazon for a discount, for 398 euros. Hisense 55E8Q – Mini LED Smart TV, Quantum Dot The price could vary. We earn commission from these links An economical TV compatible with Dolby Vision & Atmos The screen of this Hisense TV has a 55 inch diagonalalthough one of its main hallmarks is its backlighting system MiniLED. Using thousands of LED bulbs much smaller than conventional ones, the TV manages zoned brightness with surgical precision. One of the points where most flat televisions falter is the bass. Although Hisense has solved this, in this model, integrating a rear subwoofer and top firing speakers. Its sound system offers a power of 40 W, which is double what the vast majority of televisions in that price range offer, or even more money. This TV is compatible with Dolby Vision IQ & Dolby Atmos and the operating system under which it works is VIDAA. It has Filmamaker Mode (which respects the director’s original vision for his film) and if you are going to use it for gaming, it is also a good option, since it has a 144 Hz refresh rate and ports HDMI 2.1. ⚡ IN SUMMARY: offer for the Hisense 55E8Q smart TV today ✅ THE BEST Panel suitable for gamers: With 144 Hz and HDMI 2.1 ports, it is a perfect screen to connect a PS5, Xbox or gaming PC, offering absolute fluidity without latency. Design: almost non-existent frames and a very robust metal central base that allows it to be placed on furniture that is not excessively wide. ❌ THE WORST VIDAA operating system… Although it is very fast and has improved a lot in 2026, it is still one step below Google TV in terms of app catalog and customization. Viewing angles… As is usual with VA type panels, if you sit very far to one side of the TV, you will notice that the colors lose some vibrancy compared to an IPS or OLED panel. 💡 BUY IT IF… You are a gamer and you are looking for maximum performance, since if you have a next-generation console or a powerful PC, the 144 Hz with VRR and HDMI 2.1 ports will be a delight for you. It is an economical TV that can withstand the pace of frenetic games. ⛔ DON’T BUY IT IF… You are a total darkness movie buff and you always watch movies in the dark and you are obsessed with perfect blacks. As good as the MiniLED is, there is still slight blooming (brightness around the white subtitles on a black background) that the OLED does not have. Some sound bars that may interest you for this TV Hisense HS2100 – Sound Bar 2.1, 240W The price could vary. We earn commission from these links TCL Q65H Sound Bar 3.1.2, 340W The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Hisense In Xataka | Best televisions in quality price. Which one to buy and seven recommended 4K smart TVs In Xataka | Best sound bars in quality price. Which one to buy and seven recommended models from 140 euros

DeepSeek has just released a model that competes with Opus 4.6. It costs seven times less and runs on Chinese chips

by

They have passed 484 days since that “DeepSeek moment“, but the wait It seems to have been worth it, because we have the new DeepSeek V4 with us. We are facing an absolutely gigantic open weights model that once again promises to crack the foundations of the proprietary foundational models of Anthropic, OpenAI or Google. This is moving, gentlemen. Gigantic and open. DeepSeek v4 is an Open Source model and comes in two versions. The first is the Pro, with 1.6 trillion parameters (1.6T), of which it has 49,000 million active. The second is Flash, with 248,000 million parameters (248B, huge for a “Flash” model) of which 13,000 are active. More efficient than ever. Both versions they make use of a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, which means that only a fraction of the parameters are activated in each inference. This allows the computational cost to be reduced significantly. Both versions support a context window of one million tokens—to include novels and novels at once as input—when in v3 it was 128,000 tokens. Furthermore, this model is much more efficient than its predecessor in computing per token: it requires only 27% of the operations per token and 10% of the KV cache compared to DeepSeek v3.2. Benchmarks promise. DeepSeek’s internal testing reveals that v4 Pro-Max (the best model with the highest reasoning ability) outperforms or is on par with Claude Opus 4.6 Max, GPT-5.4 xHigh, Gemini 3.1 Pro High, Kimi K2.6 and GLM 5.1. The results, however, are not independently verified, which means we should take them with caution. The numbers are still striking: in LiveCodeBench, a programming test, DeepSeek v4-Pro-Max achieves a 93.5% score compared to 88.8 for Opus 4.6 and 91.7% for Gemini 3.1 Pro. In other tests there is more variability, but at least on paper DeepSeek v4 Pro seems as good as Opus 4.7, which until now was the absolute benchmark. Much cheaper. But as happened with its previous version, the difference in price with those models from US companies is astonishing. As point the analyst Simon Willinson, the official prices of DeepSeek v4 Pro are 1.74 dollars per million input tokens and 3.48 dollars per million output tokens, up to almost seven times less than those of Opus 4.7 and up to almost 9 times less than those of the new GPT-5.5. With DeepSeek v4 Flash the cost is 0.14/0.28 dollars per million input/output tokens, when GPT-5.4 Mini costs up to 16 times more. The conclusion is obvious: if it really does what it says it does, the price is an absolute bargain. That is precisely the challenge: that real experience confirms what the benchmarks say. The hardware mystery. DeepSeek has not revealed what hardware has been used to train this version of its founding model. In the past they did admit that they had used NVIDIA’s H800s. Which yes it is known The thing is that the model has been developed to run on both NVIDIA and Huawei Ascend chips. This last has confirmed Baidu that its Ascend Supernode clusters based on the Ascend 950 will fully support DeepSeek v4 versions. Huawei support is “horrible” news for the US. In The Information they already commented that one of the reasons for the “delay” in the appearance of this model was to adapt it so that it worked without problems with Huawei chips. That support is according to Jensen Huang “horrible” news for the US, because it means that dependence on NVIDIA chips no longer exists or at least is reduced to a minimum. But. The launch comes at a difficult time for the company. Guo Daya, one of the people responsible for the v1 and v3 models, has signed for ByteDance to work on AI agents. Luo Fuli, who led the development of v2, joined Xiaomi last year. This launch also coincides with DeepSeek seeking external funding for the first time. They are expected to raise about $300 million and obtain a valuation of about $20 billion. according to The Wall Street Journal. From the surprise effect to the continuity effect. The launch of DeepSeek R1 in January 2025 was surprising because it demonstrated that China could train competitive models at a fraction of the cost of Western models. With DeepSeek v4 that surprise effect disappears to give way to the continuity effect. This model seems to maintain precisely what made the previous model famous: extraordinary power at a very low cost. Bad news for Anthropic. Such low prices are terrible news for Anthropic, which in recent weeks has been forced to execute a kind of “reduflation” of their new modelswhich are not more expensive but consume many more tokens. We’ll have to see if DeepSeek v4 Pro is as good as the company promises, but if it is, we’ll have another “DeepSeek moment” before us. Maybe not as notable as last year’s, but equally relevant. In Xataka | DeepSeek promised them happiness as the great Chinese AI. I didn’t count on a small detail: Kimi

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.