China was the power that launched drones. Now he has realized his danger with a decision: close the sky to them

Exactly 10 years ago an unprecedented event occurred. A small drone landed without authorization in the White House garden after its operator loses control. It didn’t have explosives or sophisticated cameras, but it was enough to activate a complete security protocol and put the authorities on alert for hours. That apparently trivial incident was an announcement to sailors. The drone empire closes its sky. It remains a paradox that China, the great dominatrix of the global drone market with millions of devices in circulation and leading companies like DJI, be the same power that has started to drastically restrict its use within its borders. Yes, I counted a few days ago the new york times that the new rules require register each device with real identity, link it to personal data and transmit real-time flight information to the government. Flying without authorization can lead to fines, confiscations and even prison sentences, and in cities like Beijing the ban is almost total, to the point of preventing the sale or entry of drones into the capital. Total control of airspace. Thus, the regulatory tightening It has turned what was once a recreational or professional activity into a terrain full of obstacles. In practice, much of the urban space is left out of use, with permits having to be requested in advance and rarely granted. In fact, users throughout the country have denounced interrogations, sanctions and confiscations even on flights that they consider legal, while some claim to receive calls from the police as soon as they turn on their devices. The result is a paralyzing effect: the sky is still full of drones in theory, but in practice fewer and fewer take off. Security, fear and Ukraine and Iran. Behind this shift is an easy-to-understand key factor: modern warfare. has shown that drones are no longer toys, but combat actors of first order. Recent conflicts have made it clear that even cheap models can monitor, attack or alter critical infrastructuresomething that especially worries Beijing in terms of internal security. The possibility of these devices being used against sensitive infrastructure or even political leaders has accelerated a response that seeks to eliminate any margin for improvisation in the air. The economics of low altitude. Paradoxically, the Times said that the tightening comes just when China wants to expand the commercial use of drones in what it calls “low altitude economy”. The objective is to turn them into key tools for logistics, agriculture, industrial inspection or light transportation. But to achieve this, the government considers it essential to first impose absolute control of airspace, like someone reorganizing a city before opening it to mass traffic. The problem: that this previous order is suffocating the ecosystem that it aims to promote. The final dilemma. If you like, the result is a contradiction that is difficult to resolve in Beijing: the nation that raised and built the global drone industry is limiting its use by the danger they perceive to the point of stopping innovation, business and adoption. Companies see sales fall, the second-hand market grows and entrepreneurs abandon projects due to the impossibility of operating. Meanwhile, some experts warn of another unexpected consequence: restricting access too much may prevent training future operators, just when the world is heading towards wars and economies where knowing how to handle a drone will be a strategic skill. Image | Infinity 0 In Xataka | China just showed the world what comes after the combat drone: 96 drones with a science fiction launch In Xataka | 200 drones in the hands of a single soldier: China is advancing very quickly in a type of war that seemed like science fiction

be the first world power

China has a very peculiar way of establishing its roadmap towards its great objective, which is none other than become the first world powerand here technological mastery is crucial. They do it through a very communist tradition: the five-year plans that they started. China already has its new plan for the period 2026-2030 and it is the most ambitious to date. The 15th five-year plan. China started this five-year plan in 1953, so this is the fifteenth. It was approved at the beginning of the month and it details the roadmap for the next five years. The main objective of the plan is to reinforce China’s comprehensive security in the face of extreme scenarios, ensuring economic, energy and military resilience while maintaining the ability to compete in advanced technology. The technologies of the future. With the ‘Made in China 2025’ planChina set out to lead in thirteen strategic technologies with quite good results. In its new plan, China establishes the priority strategic technologies for the next five years: Yes, but. China’s ambition is undeniable, but whether they are going to achieve all these objectives is another matter. They count in The Economist that, in the past, China has managed to lead in technologies that were already mature, such as renewable energy or electric vehicle batteries, but has had more difficulties in complex areas such as advanced chips. This new commitment includes many technologies far from the sectors where they already dominate and for which there are still many unknowns, both technical and commercial. Economic growth. It is another of the axes on which the plan is based, although for this they are given time until 2035. The government wants to increase the GDP per capita, which is currently at 14,000 dollars, to at least 20 or 30,000 dollars. To achieve this, they would need to grow between 4 and 8% annually over the next decade. The Chinese economy has started 2026 somewhat better, but it takes time in decelerationso it’s going to be complicated. China prepares for war. Perhaps it is the most overlooked part of the new plan, but the one that makes the most sense in such a turbulent geopolitical scenario. China wants to ensure that it is strong on all fronts, a kind of “whatever may happen.” To achieve this, they want to create strategic industrial zones in inland areas and ensure food and energy self-sufficiency. Furthermore, in the field of defense, they want to prepare for war scenarios with unmanned and intelligent weapons and reinforce border security. Image | Pycril In Xataka | You go to a music festival, a man marries you in two minutes: the idea in China to reverse the demographic crisis

China is giving an overwhelming lesson in nuclear power plant construction to the rest of the planet

The time it requires the construction of a nuclear power plant From the moment the concrete is poured until the moment it is connected to the electrical grid, it takes between 15 and 19 years in the West; between 7 and 9 years in Asia and the Middle East; and 6 to 10 years in India and Russia. And the total cost of the project usually ranges between 24,000 and 60,000 million dollars. Barakah 4 nuclear power plantin the United Arab Emirates, has four nuclear reactors, took 9 years to build and cost $24.4 billion. On the other hand, the nuclear plant Hinkley Point Cin the United Kingdom, clearly illustrates the execution problems faced by some Western nuclear projects. After several delays Its first reactor will come into operation at best 13 years after the start of construction of the plant. And its final cost will exceed 50 billion dollars. At an intermediate point, Vogtle Unit 4 is established, in the US, which has taken 11 years to be operational and has cost about 35 billion dollars. As can be expected, the number of reactors and the technology they use have a profound impact on the cost of the plant and the time that needs to be invested in its development. Even so, as we have just seen, construction costs and time vary greatly from one region of the planet to another, especially if we introduce China into the equation. And in this scenario the country led by Xi Jinping is unbeatable with a average construction time of 6 years per nuclear plant and a cost of $2,500/kW compared to the 10-year average and almost 8,500 dollars/kW for the rest of the planet. China’s recipe is the most competitive Shangwei Liu explains clearly in the article you published on the website of the Roosevelt Institute what is the strategy that China has devised to reduce the cost and time invested in the construction of its next-generation nuclear power plants. Its plan is based on two pillars: the reconstruction of the supply chain and economies of scale. To a large extent, China’s success is due to the fact that it has managed to create a national supply chain that is immune to the ups and downs and instability of the international market. In addition, it has a lot of qualified labor in all links of its supply chain. There is only one country on the entire planet capable of approaching China’s numbers in this complex and demanding scenario: South Korea. On the other hand, the economy of scale that has given China so much joy in a very wide range of markets also has a place in the production of the components required by nuclear plants. Furthermore, when replacing components manufactured abroad by local elements This Asian country managed to drastically reduce costs during the first decade of this century, and stabilize them during the last decade. However, there is another factor that works in China’s favor and that we cannot ignore: its coordinated industrial policy and stable regulatory framework allow it to carry out long-term planning. There is only one country on the entire planet capable of approaching China’s numbers in this complex and demanding scenario: South Korea. Its latest nuclear plant projects show a cost of between 3,500 and 4,500 dollars/kWwhich places it close to China, with 2,500 dollars/kW, and well below the average of 8,500 dollars/kW for the rest of the planet. This achievement is the result of approaching nuclear energy as an industrial assembly line and not as a set of isolated engineering projects. Again, economy of scale makes the difference. The US numbers are much less favorable. And the total cost of its latest nuclear plants exceeds $15,000/kWalthough presumably this figure will moderate until it barely exceeds the $10,000/kW in future projects. If Western countries want to drastically reduce their costs and moderate the time it takes to construct their nuclear power plants, they will necessarily have to look towards China and South Korea. The reconstruction of their supply chain is essential, and, in addition, they will have to resolve the crossroads posed by the commitment to large reactors, or by compact modular reactors. At the moment there are no other options on the table. Image | Generated by Xataka with Gemini More information | Roosevelt Institute In Xataka | The future of energy is floating in the Arctic: Russia’s ace up its sleeve is a nuclear plant

almost more powerbank than mobile and power to assault the high range

February and March mark the launch of almost all companies. It is that first segment of the year in which a multitude of devices are presented and launched, and POCO did not want to miss the party. We already had the POCO F8, but the rest of the family members were missing, some POCO X8 Pro that have already made their debut. Next, we go with all the characteristics of the POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max, two models that are very similar and that, above all, share something very striking: a battery that seems fireproof. bit x8 pro poco x8 pro max DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHT 157.5 x 75.1 x 8.38mm 201.4 grams 162.9 x 77.9 x 8.2mm 218 grams SCREEN 6.59-inch AMOLED panel 2,756 x 1,268 pixels 120Hz refresh 3,500 nits peak brightness 3840Hz PWM 6.83-inch AMOLED panel 2,772 x 1,280 pixels 120Hz refresh 3,500 nits peak brightness 3840Hz PWM PROCESSOR Dimensity 8500 Ultra Dimensity 9500s RAM MEMORY 8/12 GB LPDDR5X 12GB LPDDR5X STORAGE 256/512GB 256/512GB REAR CAMERAS Main 50 megapixel f/1.5, OIS 8 Mpx f/2.2 wide angle Main 50 megapixel f/1.5, OIS 8 Mpx f/2.2 wide angle FRONT CAMERA 20 Mpx 20 Mpx battery 6,500 mAh 100W charging 27W reverse charging 8,500 mAh 100W charging 27W reverse charging operating system Android HyperOS 3 Android HyperOS 3 connectivity Wi-Fi 6 NFC Bluetooth 6.0 GPS, BEIDOU, GLONASS, GALILEO Wi-Fi 7 NFC Bluetooth 6.0 GPS, BEIDOU, GLONASS, GALILEO others IP69K certification Corning Gorilla Glass 7i IP69K certification Ultrasonic fingerprint sensor Corning Gorilla Glass 7i price 309 euros (initial offer) 429 euros (initial offer) This is how Xiaomi makes money – they attract you and trap you A design that sounds familiar to us The two models are very similar. They share colors, they share a design with flat sides and both the screen and the back without curvature. Also vertical cameras that are the most distinctive element at first glance. While the Pro has two separate cameras, the Pro Max includes them in a module that stands out from the rest of the rear. The design, in both cases, is very similar to what was seen on the iPhone 17. And another clear evidence between the two is the size. Both have a screen with identical characteristics with a high density of pixels per inch, a peak brightness of 3,500 nits and something very interesting: a high PWM, of 3,840 Hz. The refresh rate is 120 Hz and the difference is the diagonal: 6.59 inches for the Pro, 6.83 for the Pro Max. Bet on MediaTek and huge batteries If both are similar in design and screen, it is inside where the Pro Max makes the differences. Both models rely on a MediaTek SoC, but the range is totally different. If the POCO It is an SoC manufactured in a 3 nanometer lithography much more sophisticated than the 4 nm of the 8500, but it also has a core configuration seeking raw power. One core up to 3.73 GHz, three up to 3.3 GHz and four efficiency cores at 2.4 GHz. The NPU is also more capable for artificial intelligence actions and in both cases the memory is LPDDR5X. The battery is another differentiating element. The POCO X8 Pro has a 6,500 mAh battery with a 100 W charge… compared to the 8,500 mAh of the POCO It maintains 100 W charging and it is commendable to have that capacity in a mobile phone that is 8.2 millimeters thick. When we do the analysis of the POCO Cameras of the new POCO X8 Pro The differences between the two are in size, processor and battery. In terms of cameras, they are virtually identical: 50 megapixel sensors for the main one, 8 megapixels for the wide angle and 20 megapixels for the front one. However, although the sensor, aperture and stabilization in both models is identical, that of the POCO X8 Pro is a Sony IMX882 and that of the Pro Max is a Light Fusion 600. According to the company, it is a new sensor philosophy to capture better photos in any condition. We’ll see what this means in the real world, since the Sony sensor in the Pro model is already known for its interesting results. Oh, and in both models, the main camera has optical stabilization. Versions and price of the POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max Given the features, it is time to address the price. You can now buy the two models on the Xiaomi website, and in both cases there is an initial offer of 100 euros. The prices are as follows for the POCO X8 Pro: POCO X8 Pro 8 GB + 256 GB – 399.99 euros, 309.99 initial offer POCO X8 Pro 8 GB + 512 GB – 339.99 euros, 449.99 initial offer POCO X8 Pro 12 GB + 512 GB – 479.99 euros, 369.99 initial offer For him POCO X8 Pro Max: POCO X8 Pro Max 12 GB + 256 GB – 529.99 euros, 429.99 initial offer POCO X8 Pro Max 12 GB + 512 GB – 579.99 euros, 469.99 initial offer In Xataka | China already has two chip manufacturers with 7nm technology. This is very bad news for the US and its allies.

What happens in some houses so that the power goes out and the leads do not jump?

It is a classic scene that has happened to almost all of us at some point, you are at home preparing dinner, you take the opportunity to put on a washing machine and, suddenly, the house goes completely dark. You go to the electrical panel expecting to find the classic switch down, but to your surprise, they are all perfectly up. This is a more common situation than it seems and one that generates deep confusion in homes. Far from being a paranormal phenomenon or a serious breakdown, the answer to this modern enigma is hidden in the technology of our meters. The answer to this everyday mystery has been popularized by Juanjo, an electrician known on the social network TikTok as @juanjo_grounding. According to this professional, when the power goes out but no protection on the house panel goes off, “it is because the meter’s ICP has gone off.” The reason is as simple as it is direct: you have exceeded the power you have contracted for your home. The technology behind the “jump”. To understand it, we must first clarify that electrical power It is measured in kilowatts (kW) and corresponds to the energy that is being demanded at a specific moment. The Power Control Switch (ICP) works as a security mechanism It is fundamental that it cuts off the electricity supply if the power consumed exceeds that power that you have contracted. The key detail is that, since 2009 and with the gradual arrival of smart digital meters, many homes They no longer have a physical ICP (a switch) in your electrical wall panel, but this control function is integrated directly into the digital counter itself. Therefore, when you connect too many powerful devices at the same time, the remotely managed meter detects the excess and cuts off the electricity to avoid overloading the installation. In fact, if you look at your meter at that moment, it is very likely that you will see a solid red light, which indicates that the contracted power has been exceeded and the ICP has intervened. So what needs to be done to get the light back? Recovering power is a very quick process what you can do yourself. First, you should unplug some of the high-consuming devices you had on to reduce power demand. Then, go to your main box, lower the main circuit breaker, wait a few seconds (between 5 and 10) and raise it again. With this simple gesture, the internal ICP of the meter is reset and will close automatically, returning the light to you. To prevent this from constantly happening again, you have two alternatives: The free solution (change of habits): Carry out conscious management of your consumption. It is simply based on not connecting all your high-consumption appliances at the same time. The payment solution (increase the power): If the outages are very frequent despite normal and rational use, it is advisable to contact the electricity company and request an increase in the contracted power. You must bear in mind that increasing the power implies paying the connection, extension and access rights, which has an approximate cost of €50 for each kW you increase. The savings angle. This is where your pocketbook comes into play. In Spain, the average electrical power of homes is between 3.45 kW and 4.6 kW. Often, the fear of “leads jumping” leads us to make the mistake of hiring above our needs, paying every month for power that we are not really using. Keep in mind that each kilowatt you contract represents a fixed cost of about €60 per year on your electricity bill. Jorge Morales de Labra, expert in the energy sector, issues a very revealing warning in the magazine The Furniture: “If you haven’t blown your leads twice in a year, you have more power than you need.” A report from the National Markets and Competition Commission (CNMC) supports this ideapointing out that if you avoid turning on all the devices at the same time and adjust your contract, you can save between €190 and €260 annually. If you have questions about whether you can lower your power, the answer is in your receipts. Marketing companies have the legal obligation to include on the invoice the maximum powers that you have demanded during the last year. The power of information. In short, that sudden blackout in which the electrical panel seems to mock you with all its switches on high is not a phantom failure, but rather your smart meter protecting your home. Understanding how the ICP works and auditing our consumption habits gives us control over our bill. In the end, understanding the electricity in our home is the first step to stop giving away money at the end of the month and turn on the savings light. Image | freepik Xataka | If Spain believed it had overcome the trauma of inflation, Qatar has just made a decision in the opposite direction

While Europe fears for its pocket after gas cuts in the Middle East, France has a plan: its nuclear power

Europe holds its breath in the face of the threat of a new energy crisis. The escalation of war in the Middle East has caused a real earthquake in the markets. The de facto blockade in the vital Strait of Hormuz puts in check the arrival of liquefied natural gas (LNG) ships from Qatar, forcing cargo ships to deviate towards Asia. With European gas reserves below 30% after an unusually cold winter, panic relives the nightmare of 2022 it is palpable. However, in the midst of this continental chaos, France observes the situation with an apparent and calculated calm. The French country believes it has an ace up its sleeve to avoid blackouts and industrial ruin: its imposing, and recently resurrected, nuclear fleet. A historical export record. While northern Europe trembles over gas, the French electricity grid operator, RTE, has just put figures on the table that support the Elysée’s optimism. According to the Bilan electric 2025Last year, France broke its historical record by exporting 92.3 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity. To put it in perspective, RTE’s Director General of Economics, Thomas Veyrenc, explained to the Revue Générale Nucléaire that this volume exceeds the annual electricity consumption of an entire country like Belgium. This milestone has returned France to its traditional role as Europe’s “electric battery”, a status that it had resoundingly lost in 2022. The secret of this success lies in the recovery of its nuclear park, which produced 373 TWh in 2025 (3.1% more than the previous year) thanks to better availability of its reactors. As pointed out by Financial Timesthis French nuclear fleet is precisely the energy lever that Europe was missing after the invasion of Ukraine, and could be the key to not having to turn on polluting coal plants again in the face of the current gas cut in the Middle East. The paradox: they export because they do not consume. Economically, the move is round. According to Le Mondethese exports have earned France 5.4 billion euros. By having so much low-cost electricity production (nuclear and hydroelectric), the country manages to maintain very competitive wholesale prices, situated at an average of €61/MWh in 2025, well below the suffocating prices suffered by neighbors such as Germany or Italy. But this “miracle” has some worrying fine print. As the specialized media warns Le Monde de l’EnergieFrance exports so much electricity mainly because its domestic consumption is stagnant. The country’s electricity demand remained at 451 TWh in 2025, 6% below pre-crisis levels. The reality is that France is far behind in the electrification of its own economy. Paradoxically, 56% of the final energy consumed by the country continues to depend on fossil fuels, especially in sectors such as transportation and heating. The energy clamp to Spain. The French master plan to establish itself as the energy savior of Europe has a clear loser: the Iberian Peninsula. As we explained in Xatakawhile Germany pays more than 100 euros for electricity and France pays 13 euros, in Spain and Portugal renewable overproduction sinks prices until they reach zero or negative values. Why doesn’t that cheap and clean Iberian energy flow to a thirsty Europe? Because France acts as a protective wall. The country maintains Spain as an “energy island” with only 2.8% interconnection, deliberately blocking vital projects in Aragon and Navarra in its network plan for 2025-2035. ANDThe eternal France-Spain conflict. The motivation is not technical, but pure geostrategy and economic survival. Paris needs urgently make profitable a pharaonic investment of 300,000 million euros in its atomic sector. Allowing the massive entry of competitive Spanish solar and wind energy would sink the prices and profitability of its nuclear plants. In fact, President Emmanuel Macron has come to attack the Spanish energy model in the international press, calling it unstable, arguing that a network does not support a 100% renewable model, and describing the urgency of interconnections as a “false debate.” However, the data dismantles the Elysée story. On the one hand, there is the “Danish mirror”: Denmark operates with more than 80% wind generation and does not suffer blackouts because it is ultra-interconnected with its neighbors to balance the load. On the other hand, the flagrant French amnesia regarding 2022 stands out, the year in which the French reactors failed massively due to corrosion problems and it was Spain that had to export electricity to rescue France from the blackouts. Because of this current plug, Spain is forced to throw it away (what is known as technical discharges or curtailment) around 7% of its clean energy because it literally “does not fit” into the grid. All this is part of a strategy of total domination by the Elysée: Macron not only seeks civil energy hegemony, but, how to collect CNBChas put a doctrine of “advance deterrence” on the table, offering the protection of its nuclear weapons to Europe in the face of the withdrawal of the United States. The Achilles heel: the uranium crisis. However, Macron’s nuclear fortress could have feet of clay. The chain RFI (Radio France International) warns that this “nuclear renaissance” faces great uncertainty over uranium supply. Historically, France obtained 20% of its uranium from Niger. But following the recent military coup, the ruling junta revoked the permits of the French company Orano, nationalized the mines and blocked exports, leaving Paris with a gaping supply hole. Now, France is desperately trying to look for new sources in countries like Kazakhstan (the world’s largest producer) or Mongolia, but there it comes face to face with the overwhelming geopolitical, business and infrastructure influence of Russia and China. A castle with a drawbridge. France has managed to build an energy strength that, in the short term, allows it to weather the Middle East storm better than its European neighbors, selling its surpluses at a gold price. But it does so at the cost of isolating the Iberian Peninsula and betting everything on a mineral, uranium, whose control is increasingly slipping out of its hands on the global chessboard. Time will … Read more

In 1958 France drew up a nuclear plan to defend Europe without the US. Now you want to activate it with a name: “archipelago of power”

In western France, off the coast of Brittany, there is a naval base practically invisible to the public where some of the quietest submarines on the planet are hidden. Each of them can spend months under the ocean without being detected and carry missiles capable of traveling thousands of kilometers. Since the 1960s, at least one of these submarines has been permanently patrolling in secret, ready to act in a matter of minutes if the order comes. The return of an old idea. In 1958, Charles de Gaulle made a decision that would mark French defense policy for decades: develop a nuclear deterrent completely independent of the United States. The logic was simple but radical for your time. Although Washington was an indispensable ally, its interests did not always have to coincide with those of Europe, and in an extreme crisis the continent could be left unprotected. Since then, the French nuclear doctrine has maintained a deliberate ambiguity about which countries or territories come inside of the “vital interests” that would justify a nuclear response. That idea, conceived in the middle of the Cold War as a guarantee of strategic sovereignty, returns today to the center of debate European in a context of uncertainty about the American commitment to the defense of the continent. From ambiguity to deterrence. Now, President Emmanuel Macron has decided to turn that strategic tradition into a concrete proposal. Under the concept “advance deterrence”France proposes for the first time deploying elements of its nuclear force on the territory of European allied countries, participating with them in strategic exercises and coordinating more closely the nuclear protection of the continent. The proposal represents a step beyond the classic French ambiguity: although arms control would remain exclusively in the hands of the French president, his presence or training in other countries would send a direct signal that the French nuclear umbrella can extend beyond its borders. A nuclear archipelago in Europe. The operational concept that Paris is exploring is based on disperse part of your deterrence strategic throughout Europe. In practice it could involve temporary deployments of Rafale fighters capable of carrying nuclear weapons in allied countriesstrategic patrols or joint exercises that integrate conventional forces from other European states into the French deterrence system. Macron has described that network as a kind of “archipelago of power”, designed to complicate the calculation of any potential adversary. Although France would maintain absolute control over the use of weapons, the physical presence of these means in different parts of the continent would reinforce the credibility of the deterrent message. Eight countries begin to move. The media reported this week that the initiative has ceased to be a simple strategic hypothesis and is beginning to take political shape. Germany, Poland, Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, Greece and Finland they already participate in talks with Paris to explore different levels of cooperation on nuclear deterrence. Some of these countries are studying participating in French strategic exercises, while others are analyzing the possible temporary deployment of French nuclear capabilities on their territory. In any case, this turn reflects a profound change in the European attitude: for decades, most governments avoided seriously discussing any alternative to the US nuclear umbrella. The factor that changes everything. What has transformed the scenario is both the French proposal and the geopolitical context convulsed. Of course, there they appear first of all the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Moscow’s accelerated rearmament and doubts about the United States’ military commitment to Europe, all issues that have forced many governments to rethink the continent’s security architecture. Donald Trump’s return to the White House and his rhetoric about reducing the American role in European defense have ended accelerate that reflection French that seems to be reaching several members of the continent. In this climate, the old Paris doctrine (which for decades seemed like a vestige of the Cold War) is beginning to be perceived as a possible centerpiece of a more autonomous European deterrence. A limited but deterrent arsenal. France has around 290-300 nuclear warheads deployed in strategic submarines and combat aircraft, an arsenal much smaller than that of major nuclear powers such as the United States, Russia or China. However, French doctrine does not seek numerical parity, but rather the ability to inflict “unacceptable” damage to any aggressor. That logic is the basis of the concept nuclear deterrent: It is enough for the adversary to believe the possibility of a devastating response is credible for the attack to become too risky. With the new strategy, Paris aims to demonstrate that this principle can be extended beyond its territory and become, for the first time explicitly, one of the pillars of European security. Image | US Navy In Xataka | In the midst of the Cold War, France designed a nuclear rearmament plan for Europe. Now it’s loud again In Xataka | France and the United Kingdom have reached a curious agreement: to merge their nuclear arsenal if someone threatens Europe

Why it is not advisable to connect the charger to the mobile phone before connecting it to the power

Putting your phone on charge is a gesture that we do practically every day and it is something that is apparently very simple. Well, it turns out that we are doing it wrong. There is a key detail that many of us overlook and that can have negative consequences for both the cable and the mobile port. There are many recommendations for take care of battery healthsuch as avoiding downloading it to the maximum or charging it to 100%, but there is another factor that is not usually taken into account and that is the order in which we connect the cable. The order of the factors does alter the product And if not Tell my partner Álex Alcoleathe owner of the Lightning cable in the photo below these lines. The fact that the pins have turned black is not a dirt problem, but rather an order problem. Álex used to connect the cable to the cell phone and then to the power, which generates a brief voltage spike that goes directly to the connector. For once nothing happens, but if we do it continuously the result is a fried cable. This is how our colleague Alejandro Alcolea’s Lightning cable looked after several months It is a common phenomenon in any type of plug: you plug it in and a surge occurs. If the cable is already connected to the phone when this happens, a small electrical arc may be created where the pins make contact. This little sparkcan cause the cable pins to become damaged and, over time, the charge begins to fail or we have to move the cable to make contact. If you are wondering if there is a possibility of frying your cell phone with this habit, don’t panic. Smartphones have internal protections to prevent them from being damaged if there is a voltage spike and we are also talking about a very brief spike. The recommended order to charge your mobile Preventing that small spark from damaging the connectors is as simple as reversing the order, that is, connecting the charger to the socket and then connecting it to our mobile phone. In this way, the voltage peak remains contained in the charger and it does not occur when we connect the mobile. Manufacturers like Huawei and Samsung They recommend following this order to avoid possible damage: Plug the charger into the power outlet. Connect the cable to the charger (if separate). Finally, connect the cable to the mobile. What to do if your cell phone doesn’t charge If your cable or the charging port on your phone is starting to fail, the charging order could be a possible reason. To find out, check if the cable pins are blackened like those in the photo at the beginning, although if it is a USB-C it is more difficult to see since they are inside. The most common thing is that dirt has accumulated in the charging port and this does not let the cable connect well. If this is the case, you can clean it using a wooden toothpick, always being very careful not to damage the charging port. It may also be that your mobile does not charge because moisture has entered the port. In this case, try to remove the liquid by tapping it against your hand and leave the phone in a place where there is air flow, never insert anything to remove the liquid as you can make it enter even more. If the problem is not with the cable or the port, it is possible that it is with the battery, so you will have to go through technical service. In Xataka | Quietly, Spain is solving its biggest energy problem: becoming the world’s second largest battery power Cover image | Ivan Linares for Xataka

China needed space to power millions of homes, so it built a mega solar plant in the open sea

That China is building power plants As if there were no secret, it is not a secret. Without going any further, in the last four years it has been able to replicate the power of the United States, the largest electrical grid in the West. And a good part of the blame solar energy has it. In fact, in 2023 it installed more solar panels than the United States in all of history, as reported by Bloomberg. Solar energy requires space, so China is finding the most varied gaps, from the tibetan plateau to the open sea, where from the end of 2025 It is already connected to the electrical network a mega solar plant that breaks records. In China there are solar panels even in the soup. The largest offshore solar plant in the world. We are talking about the solar plant located off the coast of Kenli district in Dongying city, Shandong province. This engineering project is carried out by China Energy Investment Corporation (CHN Energy) and has a nominal capacity of 1 GW. As explains People’s Dailythe official newspaper of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, is China’s first gigawatt-level offshore photovoltaic project and currently the largest offshore solar installation in the world. This is what the Shandong plant looks like. Via: People’s Daily The context: why at sea. Because land space near its large coastal cities is a precious commodity. The Chinese government has a policy of red line to safeguard land used for agriculture and solve the line “Hu Huanyong Line“: while its great solar and wind potential is concentrated in the west, in the Gobi Desert and Inner Mongolia, the megacities and their most powerful industrial fabric are in the east. China is already developing parks of renewables in their deserts, but running Ultra High Voltage lines is very expensive, involves losses along the way and crosses complicated orography. The logical but technically infernal solution is to jump into the water. Until now, floating solar energy was limited to calm waters, such as what Germany is doing with its lakesbut China is another story. The open sea brings salt corrosion, typhoons and waves. Why is it important. Because China’s coastal provinces such as Shandong or Jiangsu constitute large centers of industrial consumption. Generating energy right there avoids those transportation losses of thousands of kilometers from the Gobi desert. If it works within the expected design parameters and the maintenance costs are affordable, it will be a good boost to take advantage of the coasts within the energy transition process from fossil to renewables. The panels are simply colossal. Via: X from People’s Daily A prodigious work of engineering. We are talking about an area of ​​more than 1,200 hectares where 2,934 enormous marine photovoltaic panels are located with standardized dimensions of 60 meters long and 35 meters wide. And they are not drifting panels: it is a large infrastructure designed to withstand extreme conditions ranging from storms to freezing water. In addition, it is hybridized: under the panels the project integrates fish farms, that is, producing electricity above and fish below. This type of combination is not new, as in Guizhou province there is a giant solar plant in whose basement mushrooms are grown. Shandong is aquavoltaic and Guizhou is agrivoltaic. Some numbers that make you dizzy. This installed power of 1 Gigawatt is similar to that of a modern nuclear reactor, so that according to estimates, it will be capable of producing 1,780 million kWh of energy that will be fed into the grid each year and thus supply 2.6 million homes in the region. approximately 60% of your demand. According to the estimates of the engineering company behind it, 1.3 million tons of carbon dioxide will no longer be emitted. In Xataka | Germany has had a crazy idea to solve one of the problems of renewables: covering a lake with solar panels In Xataka | The great myth of solar panels: producing them emits hundreds of times less than coal and gas Cover | People’s Daily

the power is ready, but the cables do not reach

While the country breaks renewable generation recordsits nervous system – the transportation network – suffers an administrative thrombosis that threatens to stop reindustrialization and access to housing in its tracks. The diagnosis we’ve been counting for days: We have the power, but we have nowhere to plug it in. The problem is more about papers than cables. The main person accused in this crisis, Red Eléctrica (REE), has decided to break its technical silence to point directly at the bureaucracy. As explained by the CEO of Redeia (REE parent company)Roberto García Merino, the company does not suffer financial or supply restrictions; The problem is that “he does not have permission to invest more.” The gap between administrative times and physical execution is abysmal. As detailed by El Economistawhile building a substation barely requires one year of work, its prior processing can take between three and six years. In the case of long-distance lines, the scenario is even more bleak: six to twelve years of “paperwork” for only two years of actual construction. The “waiting room” in data. This paralysis has left a worrying x-ray: 130 GW of renewable generation have access permissionbut they wait for the infrastructure to expand so they can pour their energy. It is a figure equivalent to the entire current generation fleet. 20 GW of industrial demand and data centers await a connection that does not arrive. REE’s investment in 2024 reached a record of 1.5 billion euros, but the company insists that every project with construction permit is already underway. A collapse that extinguishes brick and industry. The situation is not just an office debate; It has direct consequences on the street. The Spanish electrical system has suffered an administrative “heart attack”. As we have explained in Xatakathe CNMC has been forced to postpone the publication of the capacity maps for three months (from February 2 to May 4, 2026) due to fear that 90% of the network nodes would appear “red”, blocking everything from factories to 350,000 new homes that, according to the Asprima employer’s association, are at risk due to lack of power. Given this, García Merino calls for shock measures: the application of “positive silences” or “responsible declarations” that allow work to begin while the bureaucracy continues its course, a strategy that is already beginning to sound loudly in Brussels. The Pyrenean wall. As the internal grid collapses, Spain produces so much cheap energy that it is forced to throw it away (curtailment). The Peninsula registers a surplus of renewables that plummets prices to levels close to zero or even negative. However, this wealth cannot be exported towards the rest of Europe. The culprit, according to various analysts and the CEO of Redeia himselfit’s France. The neighboring country acts as a “buffer” to protect its nuclear industry, preventing Spanish solar and wind energy—much more competitive—from sinking its prices. With barely 2.8% interconnection, Spain continues to be an energy island that wastes its green potential. The price of modernization Spain’s electrical future not only depends on volts, but on politics and bills. To finance this “reinforced mode” of operation and unlock investments, it is expected that in 2026 citizens will assume an increase in tolls and charges on their bills. As industry sources conclude“the plans are very nice, but they have to be built.” Spain has everything to be the battery of Europe, but as long as the processing of a cable lasts a decade, that potential will continue to be trapped in an endless bureaucratic waiting room. Image | freepik Xataka | The great electrical jam in Spain: we have plenty of electricity, but there are no cables to build houses and invest more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.