Touristification has made Mercadona find itself with a rival in Barcelona: 24-hour supermarkets

Mercadona maybe is taking over of the retail at a national level, but in Barcelona there is another phenomenon that seems to advance even faster than it grows the business fee of the Valencian chain: 24-hour supermarkets. They grow. A lot. Lot. So much so that according to the latest data of the County Council during the second half of 2025, almost a hundred were put into operation, which translates more or less into one opening every two days. There are so many that even they have sneaked in in public debate. Super 24 hour drip. The data has disclosed them The Vanguard and they are to say the least surprising. During the first half of 2025, 92 24-hour supermarkets opened in Barcelona. If we go back further, to the period between October 2020 and the end of last year, the number of activated businesses is even more significant: the total amounts to 643. The Catalan newspaper speaks of “openings” or “start-ups”, not of net growth in supply (it is likely that there are also stores that close), but even so the data is striking. It shows that on average they are activated 3.5 business every week. Is it that striking? Yes. And not only because of the figure itself. Data from the City Council confirm that, far from showing signs of saturation, the sector continues to expand with the sixth production. In autumn 2025 it was already spoken that between 2020 and 2024, 686 licenses had been granted for these premises, which translated into three openings a week. Now the rhythm has increased. The records The City Council also reflects that this expansion has not been uniform nor is it affecting the entire city equally: although openings have been noted in Sant Andreu or Nou Barris, the majority are concentrated in El Eixample and Sant Martí. Between them they have close to 140 openings in just a few years. Two suspects: tourists and expats. At this point, the question is obvious… What is the reason for this super 24-hour boom? Why does the phenomenon seem to be affecting the Catalan capital above all? To answer these questions, you just have to visit one of these places. In most of them there are two characteristics that attract attention, as mentioned recently Luis Benvenuty, reporter for The Vanguard. The first is the prices. The second, the assortment they offer. Customers find drinks, sausages, sweets, pasta… but also items that are more difficult to buy in traditional supermarkets, such as souvenirs clearly focused on tourists. As for rates, the prices are also significantly higher than those found in conventional stores. For example, a can of Coca Cola can cost €1.5, the same as a bottle of water. It is not strange that the prices in this type of business are above those applied by the rest of the sector, but also there are those who see in these rates an offer aimed primarily at tourists and expats with high purchasing power. And the controversy broke out. The problem is not the proliferation of this type of establishments itself, but how it is developing. In September The Catalan Newspaper revealed that in just two years the inspection of 209 premises had revealed 2,700 violations. The majority (more than 1,400) were by activity, although many were motivated by the impact on the landscape (600), public health issues (243), waste (157) or non-compliance with the Treasury (113) or in the workplace (118). In total they resulted in more than 500 files. Commercial fabric earrings. Although there are dozens of stores in which inspectors found no anomalies, the violations pose a problem for the group. The SER specifies that on average each of these supermarkets commits around 13which explains why there are professional groups in Barcelona that already warn of the risk of degradation of the commercial fabric. “Betting on public-private collaboration and promotion to attract certain demand would bring us much closer to a solution. In this way we would transform our commercial hubs,” advocate Barcelona Open. From the streets to local politics. Proof of the extent to which 24-hour supers are expanding in Barcelona is that they have already entered the political debate, covering the entire ideological spectrum. The PP for example has claimed greater control and the application of “exemplary” sanctions to those who break the law. Meanwhile, ERC warns of “the substitution” of native businesses. The Consistory already has been proposed improve the regulation and control of this type of business. In fact they claim that since mid-2024 its inspectors have opened almost 300 sanctioning files and more than 450 restitution files, but the doubt remains as to what extent it will affect the expansion of a business model that (as suggested by the municipal records) generates more and more interest. Images | Sandor SAmkuti (Flickr) and Google Earth In Xataka | After decades committed to being a tourist power, Barcelona already surpasses Paris or New York in something: overcrowding

Google is once again leading the AI ​​race and has something that no rival can match

Google has launched Gemini 3.1 Proan incremental update of its flagship model that comes loaded with surprises. And according to its benchmarks, the model has much more to say than it seems. In abstract reasoning, Google wants to start setting the pace on Anthropic and OpenAI. But their ace in the hole is not just that, because they have something that other startups cannot replicate: their entire ecosystem and how they are integrating AI into it. What just happened. Just three months after launching Gemini 3 ProGoogle has published Gemini 3.1 Pro. The curious thing is that the jump is much more impressive than it may seem if we only looked at that “.1” in front of it. According to the company, the new model significantly improves the reasoning of the previous one and represents the intelligence base that already fed the Gemini 3 Deep Think update, presented last week. It is available today in the Gemini app, in NotebookLM (for Pro and Ultra subscribers), in the API through AI Studio, and in enterprise environments through Vertex AI. Data. In the ARC-AGI-2 benchmark, designed to evaluate the ability to solve completely new logical patterns, without the possibility of having seen them during training, Gemini 3.1 Pro has achieved 77.1%. To put it in context: Gemini 3 Pro stayed at 31.1%, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 marked 58.3% and Opus 4.6 68.8%. That is, Google has not only closed the gap, but has gone over it. It should be noted that never before has a mid-term review of its models recorded such a pronounced advance in reasoning. What the numbers say in the rest of the benchmarks. In the comparative table that accompanies the advertisementGemini 3.1 Pro tops the majority of categories evaluated: it obtains the best result in Humanity’s Last Exam without tools (44.4%), it leads in GPQA Diamond with 94.3% in scientific knowledge, and it doubles the previous model in APEX-Agents, the benchmark for long-term tasks. It also excels in MCP Atlas (multistep workflows), BrowseComp (agent search) and MMMLU (multilingual question and answer). It should be noted that, according to these benchmarks, it is not better in everything: in GDPval-AA Elo, which evaluates tasks in real-world work environments, Claude Sonnet 4.6 surpasses Gemini 3.1 Pro with 1,633 points compared to 1,317. And in SWE-Bench Verified, the programming test with agents, Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% compared to Google’s 80.6%. However, in the global calculation, the balance clearly favors Google’s new model. In Arena Leaderboard (the classification based on user votes) still places Claude Opus 4.6 ahead in text and code, although here “the sensations” of each user take more prominence when it comes to rating, than anything else. A clear competitive advantage. The strongest argument in favor of Google does not even have to do with the power of its latest model. The company doesn’t need to convince you to use its AI: it’s already where you are. Search, Gmail, YouTube, Android, Docs, Drive, Google Photos, Maps… Its AI does not depend on you opening a specific application, but is integrated into the ecosystem that millions of people already use daily. For the rest of the startups (OpenAI, Anthropic…), they need you to use their models in specific environments (ChatGPT, Claude). Google is simply already there. It’s a moat that perhaps not even the best model in the world could sweep right now. And then there’s the price. Gemini 3.1 Pro comes to users with a subscription to Google AI Plus, Pro and Ultra, although you can also try it on a limited basis in the free plan. It should be noted that it is currently in a preliminary version. The narrative that Google wants us to have in our heads is that, for a modest price, you have access to that model, plus everything the company offers in its ecosystem, including storage. That, right now, is very difficult to overcome. Additionally, for developers, the API is also offered at a very competitive price. So, from a practical point of view and from the pocket, Google is giving everything so that all its users continue using its ecosystem, with or without the best AI. The “.1”. The AI ​​race has been at a frenetic pace for months. And the most interesting of all is that Google, which arrived late for the racehas had a hell of a year in which he has structured all the mess he had with his AI. The jump from Gemini 3 to 3.1 in reasoning is greater than what many rivals have achieved between full versions. And it has done so while maintaining the advantage of being the company that controls the most relevant entry points to the Internet. It remains to be seen how they solve monetizing your artificial intelligencebut they have certainly put in the work. Cover image | Alex Dudar and Google In Xataka | The scientist who made the AI ​​we know today possible has just raised 1 billion. His new goal is to teach him to see space

Anthropic has taken Apple’s strategy against Microsoft to the Super Bowl: making using the rival look ridiculous

Anthropic has opened the Super Bowl by attacking OpenAI with ads that show virtual therapists advertising dating apps and personal trainers selling boosts for short people. The message: “Ads are coming to AI. But not to Claude“(“The ads are reaching the AI. But not Claude.”) Sam Altman has responded in X calling them “dishonest” and accusing them of “doublespeak“, “double speech” in Spanish, although a better adapted translation could be “deceptive language” or simply “hypocrisy.” It seems like a minor skirmish, two rivals fighting over an advertisement. But under that hood is a billion-dollar question: What kind of business will AI be when it’s established? The history of the Internet is summarized in two great models: One free supported by advertising: Google, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok… regardless of whether they have premium versions. Other direct payment by subscription: Netflix, DAZN, Disney+, Apple Music, PSN… The first aims to maximize the audience, the second aims to maximize the revenue per user. The AI ​​is right now deciding which of the two paths it takes. In Xataka AI is breaking one of the oldest economic paradigms in history: that cheap equals "bad" OpenAI has already chosen and is starting to test putting ads on free ChatGPT accounts. Altman justifies it with the classic argument of democratization: “More Texans use free ChatGPT than the total number of people using Claude in the United States.” In other words: they want to reach those billions of people who are not going to pay 20 dollars a month. And for that you need advertising. Anthropic chooses the opposite. “Anthropic offers an expensive product to rich people,” Altman reproaches him. In a way, it is true: Claude is betting above all on contracts with companies and premium subscriptions of 20, 100 and 200 dollars per month. Their model depends on the AI ​​being valuable enough for you to pay for it. And so that you look from time to time to the higher plan with the temptation to go up one more step. Without advertising, without sponsored links and without responses being influenced by advertisers. The difference is not only business, it is product. An AI with advertising has different incentives than one without it. What happens when you ask the assistant what car to buy you and there is a manufacturer paying to appear in their answers? What about medical, financial, legal advice? OpenAI has promised that “ads do not influence responses.” That’s what he said in minute 0. But that promise will be increasingly difficult to sustain as monetization pressure increases. {“videoId”:”x9u4ml2″,”autoplay”:false,”title”:”Does Gemini 3 surpass ChatGPT? This is Google’s new AI”, “tag”:”Webedia-prod”, “duration”:”156″} Anthropic has its own problem: If it only reaches those who can afford to pay, AI becomes a tool of the elites. A technology that promises to democratize knowledge ends up reproducing the class divisions that already exist. We saw this coming with the arrival of $200 plans to access the AI ​​elite. A gap that creates another gap, The parallel with the history of the Internet is inevitable. Free social networks caught (almost) all of us in the 1910s, but in return they built advertising surveillance machines optimized for the engagementnot for anyone’s well-being. Payment services are cleaner, but also more exclusive. So AI is now at that bifurcation point: OpenAI is committed to being the YouTube of AI: free for everyone, supported by ads and with premium versions for those who want to pay. Anthropic wants to be the Netflix: better experience and free of ads, but only for those who pay. It is true that it maintains a free plan, but its limits are a continuous invitation to check out or leave. And now it’s up for grabs What kind of relationship with those machines that know more and more about us and from which we ask more and more?. Whether they will be services that serve us or whether they will be platforms that monetize us. In Xataka | The AI ​​of 2026 brings an uncomfortable truth: the most useful will be the one that watches us the most Featured image | Anthropic (function() { window._JS_MODULES = window._JS_MODULES || {}; var headElement = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)(0); if (_JS_MODULES.instagram) { var instagramScript = document.createElement(‘script’); instagramScript.src=”https://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js”; instagramScript.async = true; instagramScript.defer = true; headElement.appendChild(instagramScript); – The news Anthropic has taken Apple’s strategy against Microsoft to the Super Bowl: making using the rival look ridiculous was originally published in Xataka by Javier Lacort .

The US hamburger has found an unexpected rival that arrives en masse from Japan: sushi

When they arrived in the US, back in the 60ssushi restaurants were true extravagances, establishments with a diverse audience in which immigrants and businessmen eager to try new flavors mixed. The oldest business in Chicago, for example, Kamehachi, was dedicated to prepare nigiris and makis traditional for the people who came to the Buddhist Temple of the Midwest. Today things are different. Sushi has permeated US culinary culture and has become so popular that it is even in demand at children’s parties. From a gastronomic rarity it has become a rival to the hamburger. Sushi eats the US. We don’t say it. I said it in September The New York Times in a report which started with a headline that made things clear from the first line: “Sushi is more fashionable than ever in the US.” The data managed by the industry certainly show growing popularity and, above all, enviable business expectations. The Kroger chainwhich operates stores in most of the US and has been selling sushi since the early 90s, says its sales they have shot up 50% since 2019. In practice that is equivalent to selling a million rolls a day. Arrivals from Japan. The Blue Ribbon restaurant chain assures that in just a few years takeout sushi has gone from representing 6% of all your sales at 30%. Probably encouraged by this context, the Japanese firm Chiyoda Sushi has decided to bet big on the US market. A few weeks ago Nikkei revealed that in spring the operator will begin to market its trays of frozen sushi rolls in the US, where it has already achieved the support of a Japanese supermarket chain, Mitsuwa Marketplace. A millionaire business. Beyond the income statements and decisions of specific companies, the sector conducts market studies that reveal that sushi is not doing badly in its expansion to the other side of the Pacific. The research firm Circana estimates that in 2024 the so-called sushi deli (sushi sold through retail channels, such as supermarkets) represented a business of 2.8 billion dollars7% more than the previous year. All this after experiencing a notable sales increase since the pandemic. In general, according to data from the Government of Japan, in North America there are between 29,000 and 30,000 ramen restaurants and other Japanese specialties. If compared to data from a decade ago, it represents a growth of 17%. And there is no reason to think that it has peaked. a year ago Technavio estimated that the global market (not just in the US) for sushi restaurants will continue to expand in the remainder of the decade, with a growth rate of 3.5%. Beyond the numbers. The popularity of sushi in the US is not measured only in market reports and growth percentages. Much of their success is based on a more qualitative and abstract factor: nigiris and makis succeed simply because they are no longer seen as something extravagant and alien. It explained well in The New York Times the owner of Kamehachi, the oldest sushi restaurant in Chicago: after almost six decades of history, the business has seen an increase in demand for increasingly “creative” rolls, made with new ingredients, such as mango, cheese or jalapenos. Opportunity… And risk? This trend is a sign of the interest that the dish arouses, but also a risk. “The more we explore different types of rolls, the more I worry about moving away from the origins of sushi,” recognizes Giulia Sindlergranddaughter of the founder of the business, who admits in any case that she is delighted to see how Japanese cuisine is no longer something exclusive to the fooders more daring to be a pleasure shared by several generations. In a way, this assimilation into North American gastronomic culture can be traced back to the 1970s, when the California roll was invented in an attempt to hide raw fish and make the dish more palatable to Americans. Goodbye Happy Meal, hello nigiri. Perhaps the clearest proof of the extent to which sushi has penetrated the gastronomic heritage of the USA was given a few days ago. The Wall Street Journal in an article in which he revealed something surprising: in the US it is no longer strange to find children’s parties in which Japanese food has replaced ‘orthodox’ options, such as pizza or hamburgers. The reason? Probably a combination of factors that combine its growing popularity, but also the presentation of the sushi, the aesthetics of the premises or even the content of the rolls. “The more sugar we put in rice, the more it is eaten,” recognize Trevor Corson, author of ‘The Story of Sushi’. Your consumption level may be far from the huge intake of hamburgers that the US registers each year, but the trend led by sushi is surprising to say the least. Especially in a context marked (at least in Spain) by the fall in consumption of fish. “He doesn’t want fries or chicken nuggets. He wants tropical shrimp tempura,” joke Laureano Escobar, a 40-year-old man, when he talks about the culinary tastes of his six-year-old daughter. Images | Daniel (Unsplash) and Only Seafood (Unsplash) In Xataka | Until the 90s, no one in Japan ate sushi with raw salmon. Until a marketing campaign changed everything

Claude has become more than just a rival to OpenAI: he is its new existential threat

Several software stocks are falling just since Claude Cowork It’s going viral. Those collected by iShares Expanded Tech Software ETFwhich has a cumulative drop of 6.4% in the last five days. It has also been a few days since OpenAI announced that it is going to introduce ads on ChatGPT. Why important. It’s not just that Claude Cowork is cool and works well. The thing is that OpenAI’s business model is beginning to show cracks while Anthropic gains ground where it matters: in companies that really pay. In figures. Claude dominates 54% of the AI ​​programming market. In business environments controls 42%more than double that of OpenAI. This last piece of information is from six months ago, presumably now it has gotten worse. Cowork has only made accelerate the trend. 20% of Anthropic’s revenue comes from Claude Code alone. Meanwhile, ChatGPT quota has gone from 87% to 64% in a year. In Xataka People are holding funerals for retired AI models for a reason: they are not a "tool" but a support The background. According to historical data since 2001 that collect Sherwood Newswhen the software ETF falls at least 5% in a month, the S&P 500 usually also falls between 5% and 6%, but this time it has not been like that: it has risen 1%. The overall market going up while software goes down has only happened 28 times in over twenty years. And three of them have been this week. Between the lines. Doug O’Laughlin of SemiAnalysis explains it this way in Sherwood News: “Claude Code is the ChatGPT moment repeated. You have to try it to understand it.” His argument is devastating for traditional software. Workflows, interfaces, integrations are going to stop mattering. The only valuable thing will be access to the data via API. Everything else is generated instantly. Yes, but. OpenAI urgently needs money to build its data centers. And it does not have an ecosystem of services like Google or Meta to finance itself. Hence the newly announced announcements for ChatGPT, which will arrive “in the coming weeks” as announced on Friday. Clearly it is a way to better monetize the hundreds of millions of free users, and with that cash flow sustain their growth and spending. On the other hand, Claude Code is powerful, but not perfect: as Kelsey Piper said99% of the time using Claude Code is like having a magical, tireless genie, but 1% of the time it’s like yelling at a pet for peeing on the couch. He keeps making mistakes, sometimes gets stuck on complex tasks. {“videoId”:”x9u4ml2″,”autoplay”:false,”title”:”Does Gemini 3 surpass ChatGPT? This is Google’s new AI”, “tag”:”Webedia-prod”, “duration”:”156″} And now what. For software companies, O’Laughlin’s message is devastating: get out of “information work” as soon as possible. If your differentiation is doing things faster or with better design, you’re done. The only thing that will matter is who has the data and who controls access via API. As summarized Axios in his analysis of the weekit’s unclear who wins the AI ​​race. But the pace is accelerating with no signs of slowing down. And what is increasingly clear is who is losing it. In Xataka | The AI ​​of 2026 brings an uncomfortable truth: the most useful will be the one that watches us the most Featured image | Anthropic (function() { window._JS_MODULES = window._JS_MODULES || {}; var headElement = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)(0); if (_JS_MODULES.instagram) { var instagramScript = document.createElement(‘script’); instagramScript.src=”https://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js”; instagramScript.async = true; instagramScript.defer = true; headElement.appendChild(instagramScript); – The news Claude has become more than just a rival to OpenAI: he is its new existential threat was originally published in Xataka by Javier Lacort .

Now a new “rival” has emerged in Morocco

Until a few days ago, the map of human evolution in Africa had a major “black hole” of knowledge. We had data that indicated that the Homo sappiens It emerged about 300,000 years ago thanks to the remains of Jebel Irhoud and we knew that our most distant ancestors ran around the continent a million years ago. But in the middle there was no information about it. A new study. To address this gap, an international team led by paleoanthropologist Jean-Jacques Hublin has published in Nature a discovery that not only fills that void, but also It forces us to recalibrate when and how we begin to be “us.” They have finished putting the focus on a quarry in Casablanca (Morocco) where the remains of what could be our oldest direct ancestors have appeared. A treasure under the quarry. This site is not entirely new, but what has been revealed is. In the so-called Grotte à Hominidés Researchers have been able to find three jaws (two from an adult and one from a child), isolated teeth, vertebrae and a fragment of a femur. This femur the truth is that It has a macabre history behind it, since it has marks of hyena teeth, which suggests that these individuals were not buried, but rather were the feast of the predators that lived in this cave. But the interesting thing about these remains is undoubtedly in their morphology, which presents very primitive features, but, at the same time, their teeth and the structure of their jaw show “derived” features that already point directly towards the Homo sapiens. Technology behind the date. In paleoanthropology the difference between an “interesting find” and a “revolution” usually lies in the dating of the discovery. Something that today can be done with great precision thanks to the combination of geology with modern techniques. In this case, the researchers used the technique of magnetostratigraphy to analyze 180 sediment samples to identify the Brunhes-Matuyama transition. This transition in the sediments is fundamental, since it is a global event that occurred about 773,000 years ago, when the Earth’s magnetic field was invested (magnetic north became the current geographic north pole), and which is useful for dating sediment samples. Its dating. By finding the fossils right in this stratum that we have so well studied along with when it occurred, we can now set a date of 773,000 years with a margin of error of just 4,000 years for these fossils. And although 4,000 years may seem like a large margin of error, the reality is that in geological terms it is like telling the time in a very exact way (even with its seconds). The end of the reign of Atapuerca. For years, the Homo antecessor from Atapuerca (Spain) was proposed as the common ancestor of sapiens and Neanderthals, to make sense of this void. But this discovery completely changes the narrative we have on the table. Hublin’s study suggests that these Moroccan hominids are evolutionarily closer to us than the Homo antecessor. In this way, while the Spanish fossils seem like a lateral branch that adapted to the European environment, those from Casablanca would represent the main African lineage. Something that also fits with current genetic studies that place the divergence between modern humans and Neanderthals approximately 800,000 years ago. It doesn’t fit everyone. Like any great advance, this scientific article has raised a lot of dust in the sector, since not all experts are convinced that the origin is exclusively African. On the one hand, María Martinón-Torres, director of CENIEH, criticism The study ignores recent Asian fossils (such as those from Harbin or Hualongdong in China) that also show modern features at ancient dates. On the other hand, Antonio Rosas, from the CSIC, raises a reasonable doubt: If these fossils are close to the root of the common ancestor, why don’t they show traits that also point towards Neanderthals? What it means for the future. This discovery in Casablanca breaks the paradigm that the Homo sapiens It was a recent “invention” from 300,000 years ago. Instead, it suggests that it was a much longer, more complex and deeply rooted process in North Africa. What is happening right now is that Hubblin’s team is continuing to dig. With current dating technology and the possibility of finding more cranial fragments, the next step will be to try to extract ancient proteins from the teeth to confirm, through paleoproteomics, if the DNA confirms what already seems obvious: that the bones are older than we think. Images | Ibrahim Jonathan In Xataka | A museum kept bones for 20 years that they thought were rubble. Now we know that Mexico had its own T-Rex

from image bank to Adobe rival

Tomorrow, November 20, our Xataka NordVPN Awards 2025which you can follow from our website. In them we will reward the most important devices and technologies of this year and for the first time we will present the special Xataka Award to the best Spanish technology company. The winner is Freepik, the Malaga company that has gone from being a bank of images and graphic resources to competing directly with Adobe and Figma. Omar Pera, its CPO, will accompany us during the gala. The pivotal moment: when DALL-E 2 changed everything Founded in 2010 in Malaga as a simple search engine for free images, Freepik served millions of users with a simple business model: facilitating access to graphic resources. “We started the company because we were making web pages and it took us a long time to find the image we wanted,” its CEO, Joaquín Cuenca, explained to us in an interview at the beginning of the year. The launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022 It was the turning point. Cuenca’s first reaction was visceral: “This makes what we are doing obsolete.” But he quickly came to a more important conclusion: “I saw him as unstoppable.” There was no debate about whether generative AI would transform their industry, but rather how to respond. The company went from marketplace from static content to develop your own video generation, editing and production tools. And the impact has been brutal: “Almost 50% of new subscribers, their first action is to do something with AI. A year and three months ago it was 0%,” Cuenca told us in February. “And more than 50% of existing subscribers are already using AI on Freepik.” Today Freepik serves more than 150 million monthly users with a complete ecosystem of tools: Freepik, Flaticon, Slidesgo, Wepik and Magnific AI. They already exceed 800,000 paid subscriptions. Own technology to avoid lawsuits Freepik developed F Liteits generative model trained exclusively with 80 million of its own commercially licensed images. It is a strategic bet to avoid the lawsuits that companies like Midjourney and OpenAI are having to face. Solid legal ground as a competitive advantage. Magnificenta Murcia startup purchased in 2024, went viral for its ability to increase the resolution of images without distorting details. Mysticits star model, competes with Ideogram and Midjourney. Regarding the latter, Cuenca is clear: “We have a lot of respect for Midjourney,” but he considers that Freepik is superior in adherence to the prompt because “Midjourney takes a lot of artistic license.” They are also clear about their position regarding OpenAI. For Cuenca, DALL-E “was a diversion from OpenAI”: “If you have the possibility of getting the best language model in the world in your company, everything else is a distraction. With that potential, starting to make images makes no sense.” It is precisely that distraction from the giants that opened a window of opportunity. The stone in the shoe Freepik’s commitment is to build an all-in-one platform instead of forcing the use of different applications: generation with several models, video with Google I see 3 (they became the first in the world to integrate Veo), complete editing, audio, conversion to SVG… “AI is very well aligned with what we want to do, and in fact helps us expand the catalog of things that we can solve for the user,” explains Cuenca. They no longer compete as much with Getty or Shutterstock as with Adobe and company. Video is the next frontier. “The video is now where the image was in 2023,” Cuenca told us. It still requires many iterations to achieve the desired result, but the room for improvement is enormous. Democratization from Malaga, without complexes Freepik believes that AI democratizes the creation of visual content, allowing businesses of any size to produce more engaging material without the need for large budgets or specialized equipment. And he does it from Malaga, without complexes. Although it has an office in San Francisco, its center of gravity remains in Andalusia. “From Malaga to Madrid is nothing, it’s two hours or so,” explains Cuenca, who considers that the real problem of Spanish entrepreneurship is not location: “We lack people who have good ideas, that is the main brake.” Freepik competes globally from there. It is one of the great successes of Spanish technology, and without a doubt the greatest national reference in generative AI. In just two years, Freepik completely reinvented itself: from distributor to developer, from marketplace to ecosystem, freemium An essential subscription for hundreds of thousands of creative professionals. A transformation that makes it worthy of the first special Xataka Award for the best Spanish technology company. Featured image | Xataka

OpenAI has turned ChatGPT into mainstream AI. In the business world the game is being won by its great rival

Anthropic is nowhere near as well-known as OpenAI, but its AI model, Claude, is gaining traction almost unnoticed. Perhaps because he is doing it in a somewhat more opaque sector like that of companies. at least like this I pointed it out this summer a study by Menlo Ventures that certainly paints an interesting picture for this corporate AI war. Overtaking on the right. The data of that company venture capital companies reveal that at the beginning of 2023 OpenAI dominated the business segment with its AI models: it had a 50% share, when Anthropic barely had 12%. In July the situation had changed radically, and while OpenAI had reduced its share to 25%, Anthropic had managed to grow it to 32%. Source: Menlo Ventures. Companies bet on Claude. According to data from OpenAI itself, the company already has 800 million users. A small part of them already use a paid subscription, and that has allowed annual revenue to rise to $13 billion by 2025. Of them, 30% come from companies. Anthropic itself points out that revenues in 2025 will be about 5,000 million dollars – although they may end the year with 9,000 – but 80% of them come from business clients, whose number now amounts to 300,000. The difference is notable. The programmers, protagonists. The Menlo Ventures report further argues that there is one type of professional user that is especially important in those numbers: programmers. In fact, Anthropic’s market share among developers is 42%, while OpenAI’s is 21%. A priori and according to this data, the developers’ preference is clear: they like Claude more than ChatGPT—and specific products, Claude Code and OpenAI Codex—when it comes to programming. Source: Menlo Ventures. Companies pay more easily. This reality seems to make it clear that for business users the benefits seem to be clearer and that is why companies do not seem to have qualms when it comes to paying for subscriptions to these AI models. Not only in programming, but for example in legal or administrative departments is where ChatGPT or Claude can improve productivity and save work for professionals, who pay to be able to use these options without the limitations of free plans. Even Microsoft signs up. Anthropic’s reputation is making companies traditionally linked to OpenAI also want to start betting on its models. This is what happened with Microsoft, which in September announced that Claude would be available in the Copilot suite in addition to ChatGPT. Meanwhile, OpenAI conquers the ordinary user. OpenAI’s approach is quite different. Although it obviously has part of its business focused on companies, its latest movements are very focused on attracting the largest possible number of users. The launch of Sora 2 and its social network Sora, and the recent presentation of the ChatGPT Atlas browser – which of course can also be used by professionals – indicate this. But. The data that puts Anthropic in this excellent position among companies comes from the Menlo Ventures study, but this company is an interested party because one of the startups in which it has invested is precisely Anthropic. Not only that, it is a common criticism among Anthropic users that their models are comparatively more expensive than those of competitors like OpenAI. These conclusions from the Menlo Ventures study may therefore be subject to suspicion. Image | Fortune Brainstorm Tech 2023 In Xataka | Anthropic has seen what OpenAI is doing with its circular financing and has decided that you only live once

Dreame is Dyson’s Chinese rival. And now it is going to arrive in Spain copying Xiaomi’s strategy

Dreame has more than doubled its revenue in Europe in recent months and Spain has become its key market for the next step: replicating Xiaomi’s manual eight years ago. Why is it important. The Chinese company has not only come to sell vacuum cleaners. It has come to build a complete connected home ecosystem that fully competes with traditional European brands. Dyson, Philips or Bosch compete in design and brand prestige, but Dreame focuses on another aspect: offering 80% of the quality at 40% of the price. It is the same strategy that Xiaomi used to conquer Spain: launch an anchor product at an aggressive price, quickly gain market share and expand to the rest of the home. The current situation. Dreame has reported a 139% growth in its year-on-year revenue in Europe between January and July 2025, as published Expansion. Spain has exceeded the company’s initial expectations, which now plans to open two physical stores in Madrid and Barcelona. The brand already operates combining online sales with presence in MediaMarkt and El Corte Inglés. Although the greatest weight remains in digital, the physical channel is growing. The background. The expansion plan goes far beyond robot vacuum cleaners: At IFA 2025, Dreame presented a complete ecosystem of 22 product lines, 15 of them new. It will soon launch televisions, dishwashers, air conditioners and small kitchen appliances in Spain. It will also consolidate its personal care range with hair dryers and straighteners, and add robotic lawnmowers and pool cleaners. It is the exact copy of the Xiaomi model: You enter with a competitive technology product at a disruptive price. You gain market share quickly. You build loyalty with an ecosystem of connected devices. And you expand category by category until you become a relevant player in the market. Xiaomi, by the way, entered the field of large household appliances in Europe just a few days ago with the trojan horse strategy. In detail. The commitment to innovation is the central argument of Dreame. More than 60% of its staff is dedicated to R&D and it has more than 6,300 patents worldwide. At IFA he announced a cleaning robot capable of climbing stairs or with an arm to clean in difficult areas. But that race “for innovation” has also taken them to court. Dyson sued Dreame for marketing two stylers very similar to its Airwrap model. The Unitary Patent Court ordered the provisional withdrawal of two models of these hair stylers in Spain due to their similarity to the British device. Whether or not the blood reaches the river (Dreame is going to resort), it is evident that there is inspiration in Dyson. You just have to look, for example, at the air purifier in the image that heads this article. The contrast. The question we ask ourselves at this stage is how long Dyson, Philips, Bosch and company can last before losing market share. Dreame is the type of China in the shoe (pun intended) that makes the grown-ups very uncomfortable and against which there is no easy antidote. Traditional brands have built their business on design, prestige and high margins. Dreame offers them direct competition in technical quality at less than half the price. It is the same dilemma that European mobile phone manufacturers had to face years ago when Chinese brands arrived. AND We already know how that movie ended.. At stake. If Dreame replicates Xiaomi’s success in Spain, European brands will have to face a difficult decision: Or they lower prices (and margins) to compete. Or they accept a progressive loss of market share. The third option, less likely, is that one of them will progressively weaken and end up being bought by a Chinese competitor seeking quick access to European distribution and Western brand prestige. The same thing happened with the Swedish Volvo, the British MG or the Italian Pirelli: they all ended up in Chinese hands at some point this century. For now, Dreame avoids giving specific figures about its growth plans. But the strategy is clear: Spain is a key market for its international expansion and the company is going to redouble its efforts to expand its presence. The physical stores in Madrid and Barcelona are just the starting signal. In Xataka | Xiaomi is no longer a brand: there are several brands fighting over the same logo Featured image | Dreame

In his career for the total domain of the solar panels, a rival has come out: the Spanish Perovskita

The sun will continue to shine, but the way we take advantage of it is changing at vertigo speed. While China and other countries are focused on improving the efficiency of Perovskita solar panels, Spain has set the point of solving another great challenge: stability. And he does it with a clear message: say goodbye to the silicon. Jubilating the silicon. Until now, talk about solar energy It was talking about silicon. Today, that equation begins to break through the Perovskita. In Madrid, an Imdea Nanocencia team has achieved that a cell reaches 25.2% certified efficiency, almost matching The world record of 26.7%. With this, Spain enters the first line of the race for the solar future. Not only that, they have also manufactured a mini-modulus of 25 cm² that maintains an efficiency of 22.1% and extraordinary stability, something that historically has been the Achilles heel of this technology. “These cells already exceed the commercial silicon, which barely reaches 18% efficiency, and open the door to the next generation of solar panels,” explains Nazario Martín, principal researcher of the project. The jump is not only academic. In research, Published in Advanced Materialsthey explain that Perovskita promises to reduce costs, be flexible, light and recyclable, in front of the silicon, whose production process is expensive and controlled almost exclusively by China. But the essential here is not so much efficiency and durability. The cells developed with the new PTZ-FL material maintain 95% of their performance after 3,600 hours of tests in demanding conditions (ISOS-D-1 protocol). In other words, we do not talk about fragile laboratory prototypes, but of devices capable of resisting the passage of time under sun, humidity and heat. The fund of the project. The advance is based on the design of molecules called Spiro-Fenotiazines, which act as “hollow transporters”, an essential layer in the solar cell. The PTZ-FL compound prevents lithium-ion migration, which is usually one of the main causes of degradation. In the words of the researchers, it is about building a “compact interface” that protects the material and improves its efficiency. In practical terms, it means that Perovskita modules are not only more powerful, but also much more resistant. China takes the lead. As he advanced above, China has focused its efficiency efforts. A study by the Huazhong University and Technology achieved a 28.8% record With a tandem cell totally from Perovskita, without silicon. This type of advance, such as Spanish, confirm that Perovskita can not only compete with silicon, but to overcome it in scenarios where it never shone: facades, windows, offices or even portable devices. There are very specific challenges. Beyond laboratory records, the great challenge is to bring this technology to the market. Today, the European Union depends largely on China to manufacture solar panels, According to an Ember report. Projects such as IMDEA not only seek efficiency, but also reduce this strategic dependence. In addition, the most expensive component of a solar panel is no longer silicon or glass, but aluminum frames, which represent 14% of the total cost. A reminder that the transition to Perovskita will require innovations not only in laboratories, also in factories and supply chains. Forecasts The solar future is no longer written with silicon. Perovskita has gone from being a fragile promise to real candidate for the market. The question is not whether it will come, but how and from where. Spain, with the advancement of IMDEA nanocencia, wants part of that response to have European seal. Image | Freepik Xataka | India needs more crops and solar energy than any other country. So you are installing solar panels in height

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.