They fired 5% of their workforce and some will never work again for them

Goal has been plunged into an intense personnel restructuring in what Mark Zuckerberg called “the year of efficiency.” According to published Techspotit is estimated that, since 2020, Meta has fired about 35,600 employees. The last ponytail of that restructuring of its template was given only a few days ago when Mark Zuckerberg announced that he was going to dismiss 5% of your workforce current, while It opened new vacancies For profiles of development for your AI. Many of the meta -employed could return to work for the company in these new positions, but A filtration of Business Insider He has revealed the existence of a “blacklist” of employees who will never step on a goal again. Keep back. One of the goal engineers fired in the 2022 round, observed a pattern when he tried to run for more than 20 vacancies in the finish line during all 2023. The hiring managers showed interest in hire him for his skillsbut when the first stage of the selection process began, the recruiters ruled out. When asking a hiring manager, he told him that from the hiring team they had forbidden him to do so as he considered it “not eligible for rectation.” “That was the first time I had a real indication that I was in some type of list,” said the engineer to Business Insider. Up to five former employees confirmed the investigations of the American environment. Reasons not to hire you. There are various reasons more than founded by which a company would include a laid out on a blacklist so as not to hire him again: to have a Inappropriate behavior, Filter confidential data of the company or have Low performance Continuously, they could be some of the reasons why these workers receive the “not eligible for rectation” label. A target spokesman pointed out that “there are clear criteria to determine when someone is considered not eligible for rectation, which apply to all employees that go, and there are controls and counterweights in the process so that a single manager cannot unilaterally consider someone not eligible without support.” “By saying goodbye, we determine the reason for the employee’s departure (breach of policies, dismissal for performance, voluntary resignation, etc.) and that, together with the last performance rating, determines whether an employee is eligible for recontraction,” explained the target spokesman to the US environment. Business Insider He has not been able to confirm the physical existence of that black list of hiring, but in the review of the internal communications of Meta they were found with the systematic refusal of different hiring responsible for trying to re -have recontract certain former employees. Limit to hire the best. While it is true that these lists are not illegal, the experts consulted by the news portal assured that it is not usual among the great technological ones that are permanently fighting for hire the best talent. In statements to TechspotLazlo Bock, Google personnel operations director for more than a decade, said it was “incredibly unusual. It is very, very rare. In fact, I have never heard of a company that has a designation of ‘not to recontract’ for former employees, because if an employee had a good performance, it is preferable to hire someone who already knows the company and its culture than another person.” Back to goal. After the latest goal layoffs, that the company attributed to low performance Having hardened his criteria, some former employees of the Mark Zuckerberg company wondered why they show up for a job offer in the company that fired you. The engineer who discovered the blackloca of the finish line assured to Inc.com I had a weight of weight: “It is the worst company I have worked on. But it is also the one that best pays. If I could stay there for a couple of years and earn a lot of money, I would do it.” In Xataka | Mark Zuckerberg has put on brown and gold chains to grind more. Surveys say it still falls badly Image | Wikimedia Commons (Nokia621), Unspash (Sigmund)

A 19 -year -old hacked the iPhone, was hired by Apple and ended up fired for not answering an email

The iPhone has been among us for almost 17 years. During all this time, the phone has changed a lot, but some things have remained practically intact since its launch. One of them is the closed ecosystem to which Apple products belong. Anti-Jailbreak. The Cupertino company has struggled to maintain a strong control over what can be done on the iPhone. But even in the first generation of the device there were those who rejected this mechanic and offered users an alternative: the Jailbreak. Jailbreak was nothing other than a method that was used of certain vulnerabilities of the device to remove the restrictions that Apple had imposed. Thus, those who resorted to this method accessed unpaid functions in exchange for putting their safety at risk. The road from Allegra. From advanced adjustments to the possibility of installing third -party applications without going through the App Store (store that was not available at the beginning and arrived in 2008 with OS 2). One of the hackers that had developed his own jailbreak was Nicholas Allegra. The 18 -year -old known on the network as “Comex” launched the first jailbreak publicly available for the iPhone 4 In 2010. To achieve this, he found a way to exploit vulnerability in a Safari library, so his method worked directly from the browser. Advanceing. Comex continued to cultivate his ability to break Apple’s telephone security and the following year launched Jailbreakme 3.0, which reached several iOS devices, including iPad 2. At this point, the community believed that Allegra was “years ahead” of other iOS hackers. And hired. But in 2011, his reality changed radically. The young man He went from creating Jailbreakme to be part of Applethe company that had challenged, as “remote fellow.” It is not clear what the dynamic between the multinational and the young man was, but that link did not take too long to dissolve. The farewell. After almost a year in Apple, in 2012 Allegra He announced on Twitter that was no longer part of Apple. In another message he explained that he had reached that situation because he had “forgotten to answer an email.” The mail in question was an offer to continue hired. The internship had a duration of one year and, apparently, Apple asked Comex by email to confirm if it would continue in the company for one more year. Not receiving an answer, the firm left the iphone hacker contract without effect, so it ceased to be a fellow. Images | Unspash In Xataka | Banks spent years criticizing cryptocurrencies. The BBVA will soon allow to operate with Bitcoin and ETH from its app In Xataka | Japan’s demographic crisis is leaving him without workers. Your solution: thousands of robots with a cat’s face *An earlier version of this article was published in January 2024

Trump fired nearly all inspectors general at major federal agencies

The president donald trump fired the independent inspectors general of more than a dozen federal agencies in an unprecedented purge held on Friday night. The decision paved the way for Trump to install his loyalists in the crucial role of Identify fraud, waste and abuse in government. The only Cabinet-level inspectors general who were spared were those at the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice. The Washington Post was the first to report the layoffs. An Inspector General conducts investigations and audits into possible irregularities, fraud, waste, or abuse by a government agency or its personnel, and issues reports and recommendations on his or her findings. The Inspector General’s office is intended to operate independently. The layoffs appear to violate federal law, which requires Congress to receive 30 days’ notice of any intention to fire a Senate-confirmed inspector general. Legal uncertainty could create uncomfortable encounters on Monday, when several watchdogs who were informed they had been fired planned to report to their offices for work anyway. The chairman of the Board of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency questioned the White House action in a letter to Gor late Friday, cited by The Washington Post. “I recommend that you contact the White House legal counsel to discuss the course of action you intend to follow. At this time, we do not believe that the actions taken are legally sufficient to remove the Presidentially appointed and Senate-confirmed Inspectors General,” wrote Hannibal “Mike” Ware, inspector general of the Small Business Administration and acting inspector general of the Social Security Administration. Democratic lawmakers criticized the firings, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer calling the move “a chilling purge” and warning that the firings could usher in “a golden age of government abuses, and even corruption.” . Keep reading:· They wish death to bishop who asked Trump for mercy for immigrants and LGBTQ people· Trump argues in public with the mayor of Los Angeles over her management of the wildfires· Trump continues to sign executive orders with big changes in government

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.