What do they offer and how much do the paid versions of these apps cost?

We are going to tell you the features and price of paid subscriptions for Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp that have been announced by Meta. With them, in exchange for a small payment you will get a few extra functions, with which you have total control over how your content is displayed and who can see it. These subscriptions have already begun to roll out in the United States. However, We still don’t know when it will arrive in Europe nor the price that subscriptions will have in euros. However, we can already know the characteristics and the price in dollars, something that guides us to know what they intend to offer us. Features and price of Instagram Plus and Facebook Plus The paid versions of Instagram and Facebook are designed to give you greater control over your content. You will be able to decide much better how it is displayed and who sees it. These are its exclusive features. Stories Analytics: You will be able to know how many people have seen a story again. You can also search directly in the list of views. Flexibility and reach: It will allow your stories to last more than 24 hours, with an option to “Highlight” for a week to boost their views. Privacy: Currently in you can create a list of Best Friends. Well, if you pay you will be able to create other unlimited lists of users to control who sees what. In addition, you will be able to see other users’ stories invisibly, and make posts on your profile that do not appear in your followers’ feeds. Cosmetics– You’ll also get custom app icons, timeline fonts, animated reactions, and profile pins. Price: The price of this subscription is 3.99 dollars per month (approximately 3.50 euros) Features and price of WhatsApp Plus After years fighting against the famous application that installs viruses called WhatsApp Plus, Meta is going to use the same name for its paid version of WhatsApp. It will offer some of the most requested features by users in terms of customization. They are the following: Themes for the application. Custom ringtones for specific contacts. You can set up to 20 chats. List customization. Exclusive premium stickers. Meta One Features and Price Finally, you should know that there will also be a Meta One payment service, with new plans to be tested soon in some countries. They are plans designed for professionalswith artificial intelligence functions. These are the plans: Goal One Plus– Unlocks more advanced image and video generation capabilities. $7.99 per month. Meta One Premium: designed for the most demanding. It will offer access to a superior model and benefits linked to Meta Ray-Ban glasses. $19.99 per month. Meta One Essential– Includes the classic verification badge, phishing protection, and an improved links page. $14.99 per month. Meta One Advanced: the definitive plan for business. It offers increased visibility in search, prominent positioning in the feed, a large “Follow” button in Reels, competitor analytics, sending invitations, and moderator management tools. $49.99 per month. In Xataka Basics | Member labels in WhatsApp: what they are and how to use them to organize the members of a group

Anthropic does not offer its services in China. So China has invented a black market for Claude tokens

Claude has become in the most desired model by the most demanding developers and engineers, but it is not available in mainland China for regulatory and safety reasons. The demand there remains notable, and to satisfy it, an underground token economy has emerged that allows local developers to access models such as Claude Opus 4.7, avoiding all the measures imposed by the blockade. No paying with Alipay. One of the measures that Anthropic imposes to prevent the use of its models in China is to only accept international credit cards such as Visa or Mastercard. Their payment gateways reject local payment methods like Alipay or Wechat Pay, giving Chinese users a first and important hurdle. One that they have already overcome. Virtual cards. What they are doing in China to overcome this problem is using virtual credit cards (VCC) like DuPay or WildCard. With these services it is possible to obtain Hong Kong or US credit cards financed with cryptocurrencies or through local transfers. This makes it possible to deceive the billing systems of Anthropic and other companies that offer banned services to Chinese users. SMS verifications They are also solved through “SMS farms” that also avoid this problem and even others such as identity verification that also have implemented in Anthropic. The “Transfer Stations” arrive (中转站). Another problem is that even overcoming that first barrier, latency and micro-cuts mean that the use of Claude in China is affected by continuous connection problems. To avoid them, so-called “Transfer Stations” have emerged, which are nothing more than servers that act as a bridge between foreign servers and Chinese users. These gateways receive requests from China and forward them to Anthropic servers as if they were coming from an authorized location. The latencies are also relatively low, which means that for Chinese users the experience is basically identical to that of a user in the US or Spain, for example. These stations are publicly known and do not only appear in listings on GitHub: there is a ranking with the best. Claude is almost free in China. The surprising thing about these methods is that they don’t just give Claude access in China: they do with ridiculous prices which can be 10 and even 5% of (growing) original price of the service thanks to those transfer stations. The question, of course, is how it is possible to access Claude at those prices. The almond tree trick. Thanks to the transfer stations, developers can access Claude at a price of 1 yuan for every dollar of tokens, or in other words, up to a 90% reduction in the official price. It is something that is discussed publicly and that makes it clear that several methods are used to achieve this: Mass purchase of capacity, Use of accounts created with stolen or fraudulent cards, Use of promotional credits, and A simple hook: providers lose money with Claude, but they manage to attract developers to whom they then sell more profitable local models like DeepSek. Am I really using Claude? One of the growing risks in the cheap token market is direct fraud. Some Chinese resellers have been caught red-handed offering what they call the “Claude API” when in reality what they were providing were much cheaper and mediocre models. For a user to detect this type of deception it’s very difficult unless you are working with complex tasks or you have already used models and know more or less what to expect from them. For victims, the effect is clear: they believe they are paying for the intelligence of Opus 4.7 when in reality they are receiving answers from a low-end AI model. Goodbye to privacy. When a user purchases tokens at one of these transfer stations, they completely give up the confidentiality of their data. All queries and responses end up passing through the intermediary’s servers, which can and apparently does use them to sell them to AI companies that use them to post-train their models. So everything they do and say when using these models is filtered and used as training data without the user knowing. A double business. For these providers, this business of reselling conversations is especially interesting in the face of the famous “distillations” of US models that take advantage of this data to “copy” the capabilities of those models and apply them to Chinese models. Anthropic can read us, but (theoretically) it doesn’t. It is true that the conversations we have with Claude (from Spain, for example) are also stored on Anthropic’s servers, but the company makes it clear in your privacy policy that does not use that data. In fact, we can even explicitly prohibit the company from using them in the privacy settings of Claude’s account. The game of cat and mouse. At Anthropic they know very well what is happening and they are trying to prevent it. For example, they have begun to intensively block IP ranges associated with VPN services or data centers known to be used in these transfer stations. Even so, Chinese providers usually respond with an “elastic” architecture that allows IPs of domestic residences to rotate, making the traffic appear completely normal. Image | Xataka with Magnific In Xataka | There is a thing called “Ornn price index”, it is out of control and it is bad news for everyone

five eReaders on offer to devour novels on Book Day

There are only two days left until the arrival of Book Day, so if you dare to make the leap to digital format or if you simply want to make a “wardrobe change” to renew the one you already have, today we are going to review the five best offers that we can find in these devices with brands such as Kindle or Kobo. Kobo Clara Color by 149 eurosa perfect reader for those looking for two things: color screen and a compact format. Kindle Paperwhite by 129 euros when you log in to MediaMarkt, Amazon’s best value eReader. PocketBook Verse Pro by 155.90 eurosa reader aimed primarily at those who want to use buttons to turn pages. Kobo Clara BW by 149 eurosa reader similar to the Clara Color, but with a black and white screen. PocketBook Era by 229 eurosa perfect reader for those looking for a large, color screen. Kindle Paperwhite (with advertising) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Kobo Clara Color He Kobo Clara Color It is perfect for those people looking for a color eReader without losing the portable format offered by a six inch screen. It allows you to read comics and magazines, as well as novels, manga and other types of books. But it also allows you to see illustrations and covers in color or underline dialogues with different colors to differentiate the characters in a book. And all this for 149 euros at MediaMarkt and other stores. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Kindle Paperwhite The eReader with the best quality-price ratio on Amazon is the Kindle Paperwhiteand it is basically because it offers performance like few other readers we have seen, its battery is the largest of the Amazon models (autonomy of up to 12 weeks), comes with a seven-inch screen and has 16 GB to store many books. In addition, it is waterproof. By 129 euros It is one of the best eReaders for reading in black and white. Of course, right now it is on sale for 129 eurosbut to see the discount you have to log in to MediaMarkt. Kindle Paperwhite (with advertising) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links PocketBook Verse Pro He PocketBook Verse Pro It is a very interesting eReader because it has several features. It is the ideal model if you are looking for a compact six-inch reader, but that allows the possibility of turning pages with the touch screen or through buttons, which in this case are located at the bottom. It’s also waterproof, comes with 16GB of storage, and allows you to access Dropbox. Its price in this case is 152.90 euros in El Corte Inglés. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Kobo Clara BW Do you like the Kobo Clara Color but you are only going to read in black and white? Well he Kobo Clara BW It’s perfect for you. In fact, It’s the one I usually recommend to friends and family.. It is essentially the same model, but instead of having a color screen, it comes with a black and white e-ink screen. It also has a six-inch panel, is waterproof and can play audiobooks. Its price on MediaMarkt is 149 eurosthe same one that the Kobo Clara Color has. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links PocketBook Era And if you are looking for a large model that also incorporates a color screen along with a button panel… here comes the PocketBook Eraan eReader that 229 euros It is most interesting. Its color screen is seven inches, the button panel in this case is located on the right side of the front, it comes with 32 GB of internal storage, is water resistant, has an audio output and allows access to Dropbox. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Rakuten Kobo, Amazon Kindle, PocketBook In Xataka | Which Kindle to buy: buying guide with recommendations to get it right with Amazon e-book readers In Xataka | The 25 best science fiction books

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro vs Google Pixel 10, when you offer more for much less money

Nothing has surprised us again with a mobile phone that manages to stand out in both its mid-range and high-end. In fact, it can compete with much more expensive models, as is the case with the Google Pixel 10. But… How are these two phones different? Let’s go over it in this article. Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (8 GB, 128 GB) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links The price could vary. We earn commission from these links The differences between the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro and the Google Pixel 10 Design and screens One of the most important differences is in size. He Nothing Phone (4a) Pro bets on a larger diagonal of 6.83 inches, while the Google Pixel 10 It is more compact with a screen size of 6.3 inches. The curious thing is that, despite the size, There are only six grams of differencewith 210 grams for the Nothing and 204 grams for the Google. On the back we also see a very striking difference. The Google Pixel 10 maintains the sober appearance that we have already seen in previous generations, while the Nothing mobile incorporates a larger rear camera module, in which we find several cameras and a screen (Glyph Matrix) with luminous points that turn on and off when receiving notifications or listening to music, shows the time and can even be personalized. Processor and RAM and storage configurations While the Google Pixel 10 comes with the Google Tensor G5the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro incorporates the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4. The Qualcomm processor offers balanced performance for the mid-high range and stands out for its energy efficiency. On the other hand, the Google chip is aimed at the use of artificial intelligence functions, although it heats up excessively when executing intense tasks. Both phones start with a minimum storage configuration of 128 GB, but while the Google Pixel 10 comes in this case with 12 GB of RAM, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro stays at 8 GB. Keep in mind that this configuration of the Nothing mobile phone can be very tight if we are going to use many apps or process AI locally. Photographic section Google phones usually stand out for their photography section and the Pixel 10 is no exception. However, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro has hit the table by betting on a much more attractive telephotodespite having fewer increases. The Nothing mobile telephoto offers processing that is supported by the hybrid zoom of up to 7x and the results are very good in terms of detail, sharpness and color. Its maximum digital zoom is 140x and, although it takes time to process the image and can sometimes invent some details, the level of success is adequate. Battery Both phones come with batteries with quite similar milliamp figures, since the Google Pixel 10 incorporates a 4,970 mAh battery and the Nothing mobile comes with another 5,080 mAh. However, we do have differences in the charging options: The Google Pixel 10 supports 30W fast charging and 15W wireless charging. This means that it will take a while to have the battery at 100%, especially if you use wireless charging. The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro supports only 50W fast charging (although it also supports reverse charging), which means that you will have a 100% battery in less time than with the Google mobile, but you will not be able to use a wireless charging base. Software, support and price Both phones come with Android 16, but they are different. Nothing’s mobile relies on its NothingOS customization layer, which incorporates a minimalist aesthetic and is supported by three years of updates and six for security patches. For its part, the Google Pixel 10 has purer softwarewithout a customization layer. Support in this case is seven years of updates and security patches (six taking into account that the mobile was launched in 2025). And if we talk about prices, we are faced with two mobile phones that compete in different ranges. The Google Pixel 10 is currently available for a price of 599 eurosbut it was initially launched for 899 euros. On the other hand, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is currently priced at 479 euros. In summary: which mobile phone to choose according to your tastes and needs Why choose the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro has been a surprise. Its price right now is 479 euros and it stands out in several aspects: Its quality-price ratio: Nothing’s mobile phone stands out both for its price and for its processor, the photographic section and, of course, the design, especially on the back, where we find the Glyph Matrix screen. fast charging: Despite not having a battery that supports wireless charging, the 50W fast charging allows it to be recharged to 100% in less time than the Google Pixel 10. telephoto sensorthe icing on the cake to a good photographic section in the mid-range that yields very attractive results for the price of the mobile. Why choose the Google Pixel 10 The Google Pixel 10 continues to be a very good purchase option. It has been dropping in price since its launch and is now available for 599 euros. Where it stands out the most is in: Minimum storage configurationwhich despite only having 128 GB of internal storage, at least comes with 12 GB of RAM. wireless charging so as not to be limited to using only wired charging. Google supportwhich offers six years of software updates and security patches. Technical sheet with the main differences between the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro and the Google Pixel 10 Nothing Phone (4a) Pro google pixel 10 SCREEN 6.83 inch LTPS flexible AMOLED panel 1,260 x 2,800 pixel resolution Adaptive refresh from 30 to 144 Hz 2160Hz PWM 1,600 nits maximum brightness with 5,000 peak nits Gorilla Glass 7i 6.3-inch OLED panel Resolution of 2,424 x 1,080 pixels 60-120Hz refresh Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 3,000 nits peak brightness DIMENSIONS AND … Read more

Alcohol needs to win over a generation that is becoming less interested in alcohol. Your strategy: offer something else

The alcohol industry has come to an interesting conclusion. Maybe Generation Z is less interested for the drink that millennialsbut that does not make it immune to an age-proof claim: curiosity. Starting from this premise, the companies dedicated to producing distillates and wines have decided to refocus their strategy and bet on new products that appeal to the youngest. And that happens so much for him came no/low as for him tequifresa either Dubai chocolate. The goal is clear: connect with a demographic cohort that seems to be losing interest for alcohol and will decide the future of the industry. What has happened? Basically, Madrid has just said goodbye to the Gourmet Salonone of the largest European fairs for the high-end food and beverage industry. Until then, nothing out of this world or that may be of interest beyond the specialized industry. The curious thing, how has revealed the EFE Agro agency, is that on this occasion at IFEMA not only bottles of traditional wines, craft beers and traditional spirits have been seen. Companies in the sector have wanted to bet on new unorthodox products and flavors to awaken the curiosity of customers. And that (although at first it may seem anecdotal) is of interest beyond the industry. Why’s that? Because the sector is transforming. Just take a look at the newspaper library to check it out. Although Spain chains record tourism figuresin 2024 the sales recorded by the brewery association fell by second year in a rowsomething that had not happened for more than a decade. The figures Advanced by Circana suggest that the outlook was more promising in 2025, although also with surprise: sales of ‘without’ beer increased almost three times as much as those of alcoholic beverages. Its turnover is still much lower than that of ‘con’ beer, but there is a trend change. And the rest of the drinks? The panorama is similar in the case of wine. The Spanish Oenology Federation estimates that in 2025, 9.35 million of hectoliters, 5.2% less than the previous year. As with beer, its demand is very established and has experienced fluctuations in recent years, but that does not mean that wineries are looking for new business niches. For example, the development of ‘without’ wines or the use of new formatslike packaged broth bag-in-box or served directly from the tap. With respect to spirits, the employers’ association estimates that in 2024 their consumption contracted 3.7%which aggravates the fall that had already suffered in 2023. What is the strategy? From what has been seen these days at IFEMA, the industry wants to go one step further. Bottles of tequila flavored with strawberry, melon, peach or even with even more unorthodox flavors have been promoted on the stands. Orujos Panizo, which has been dedicated to the production of spirits for almost 90 years, has launched, for example, a cream liqueur Dubai chocolate. The objective is clear: to take advantage of the wave of popularity of the sweet and reach out to the young public at a time that, the head of the company recognizes, is not exactly good for the industry. The strategy does not seem misdirected. EFE Agro assures that the demand for some fruit creams with tequila is growing by double digits. Of course, the product starts from “very low” figures. Are there more ideas? Yes. To bet on him tequifresa either meloncello the one known as came no/lowpartially dealcoholized or alcohol-free broths. From being practically unknown in the sector, ‘without’ bottles have begun to sneak into professional tastingscontribute millionaire income to some companies and (above all) generate promising business expectations in the medium term. The specialized medium Italian Food News assures that the ‘without’ wine market expects to expand with a compound annual growth rate of 10% until 2033, expanding its market from 2,000 million to around 5,200. Does consumption change that much? It seems so. And the change is especially interesting among Generation Z, the population cohort born between the mid-1990s and the first decade of this century. Although 76% of young people between 14 and 18 years old admit having tried alcohol at least once in their life and 21% have gotten drunk in the last month, their relationship with drinking is changing. At least when compared to previous generations. “Generation Z drinks less than millennials and these, in turn, less than the boomers“, explains to The Country Andera Mellado, promoter of a ‘sin’ beverage distributor. “They’ve seen how their elders drank and they don’t want to get into that.” Is it just supply and demand? No. It’s something cultural. Habits change, the way of find a partner and to enjoy the leisure. They even change events that until not so long ago were inextricably linked to the “open bar”, like weddings. The vocabulary is also transformed. Terms become popular straight edge and Dry January and Anglo-Saxon expressions like superb curious, mindful living either zebra stripingwhich identify new ways of approaching drinking. That of course doesn’t mean that alcohol has disappeared from Generation Z’s radar or there are no more bottles. 28% of young people recognize that in the last month they have binged on alcohol, the so-called bringe drinking. What do the studies say? That in general there is a decrease in alcohol intake. Although Spain has one of the higher levels of consumption, WHO data show that the average per capita has decreased in recent decades. If in 1975 it reached 18.5 l (pure alcohol), in 2022 it was already around 11.7. The study on consumption among younger youth (14-18 years old) from the Ministry of Health also shows a gradual loss of interest in drinking over recent years, especially since the middle of the last decade, although in both cases it is a trend with fluctuations. Images | Panizo Distilleries, Vitaly Gariev (Unsplash), Vitaly Gariev (Unsplash) and Ministry of Health In Xataka | Having a beer or a wine at 65 seems like a harmless indulgence. We have more and more evidence to … Read more

What competitions will you see in this new sports offer?

Disney and ESPN have announced the launch of ESPN on Disney+ in 53 countries in Europe and Asia-Pacific, including Spain. With this movement the global presence of the sports brand expands to approximately 100 markets all over the world. For Spanish subscribers, the news means access, above all, to NBA, NHL and American university sports, on the same platform where they already watched Marvel or Star Wars (or the Women’s Champions League). LaLiga and the men’s Champions League, however, continue on other platforms. What exactly is coming. The initial offer will vary by market, with specific content for Spain to be confirmed, as well as the landing date. What is assured for all territories: NBA and NHL starting with the 2026-27 season, American university tournaments including the men’s and women’s March Madness, college football with the College Football Playoff, and events such as the Little League World Series. The complete collection of ’30 for 30′ documentaries, a library of sports films, and the football analysis program ESPN FC are added. What there was already. From the 2025-26 season, Disney+ is the exclusive home of the UEFA Women’s Champions Leaguewith all 75 matches available at no additional cost to subscribers. The production is carried out by ESPN, which was already launching its sports presence on the continent. The platform chose a growing niche sport so as not to collide head-on with DAZN and Movistar in the terrain where they are most armored. Where are LaLiga and the men’s Champions League. The Spanish televised football market is locked and the term is long. Movistar Plus+ and DAZN share the ten games of each LaLiga matchday until the 2026-27 season, and in November 2025 they already renewed that agreement for the next cycle. The agreement covers seasons 2027-28 to 2031-32with five games per day for each operator. Disney did not participate in that tender. The situation in the men’s Champions League is just as airtight. Telefónica obtained exclusive rights to all UEFA competitions (Champions, Europa League, Conference League, Youth League and Super Cup) for the Spanish market between 2027 and 2031. This shields Movistar from any competitor until at least 2031 in the most followed competition on the continent. On the other hand, as already was discussed last yearDisney+ shows more interest in the English market, where it acts as the main operator, than in Spain. And outside of Spain? The panorama is very different. In the United Kingdom and Ireland, Disney+ exclusively broadcasts Saturday night LaLiga matches, an agreement in force until the 2027-28 season. In the Nordic countries, Disney+ has rights to the Copa del Rey, UEFA Europa League, Conference League and DFB Pokal. In Latin America, ESPN has been integrated into Disney+ for years with LaLiga, Champions League, Premier League and practically all top-level European football. The sport matters as much as the series. Streaming platforms have been detecting for years that series and movies alone do not retain subscribers with the same effectiveness as live sport. The women’s Champions League was a very calculated bet by Disney+ and the arrival of ESPN to 53 countries It is the next phase of that strategy. It’s also not the first time that ESPN has tried to establish itself in Europe: the brand already operated linear channels on the continent before withdrawing them when its strategy pivoted towards the streaming. As in Latin America, its plan now incorporates ESPN as a hub within a platform, Disney+, with existing subscribers. In Xataka | “What a service, do I pay for this?”: this is how LaLiga’s massive IP blocks are causing reputational and economic damage

fewer and fewer companies offer it

When the pandemic forced millions of Spaniards to work from home, many thought that nothing would be the same again. Companies had shown that it was possible and employees had found that they would rather do it than lose hours of your life in traffic jams or by public transport to their offices. And yet, six years laternumbers tell a story completely different. The 16th edition of the report State of the labor market in Spain 2025 that InfoJobs and Esade have just presented makes it clear: teleworking has not only not grown in new job offers, but it has been declining for four years in a row. And in 2025, remote work has hit a low that few anticipated. A setback that is no longer punctual. The study indicates that, in 2021, when hiring for remote work was at its peak, 21% of the vacancies published on InfoJobs included some form of remote work. In 2025, that figure dropped to 11%, which represents 280,810 positions with this modality. Four consecutive years of decline already make this data a structural trend, not a temporary correction in business culture. The sharpest drop in this type of day It occurred between 2023 and 2024, with a decrease of four percentage points in a single year. In 2025, three more points were lost, leaving the data below even the teleworking offers that were published in 2020, in the midst of the health crisis. Mónica Pérez, director of communication and studies at InfoJobs, assures that “many companies that launched into these models and saw the B sides related to productivity, team building or cohesion, backed off somewhat.” What the official data say. It should be noted that the data provided by the Infojobs study refers to new job offers, not to positions that already existed and have been maintained during these years. When observing both phenomena we find opposite trends. As companies cut teleworking options in their new vacancies, the data from the Active Population Survey (EPA) highlight that the real number of employees who telework in Spain has continued to grow. The last ones consolidated data of 2024 indicate that 14.6% of employed people teleworked regularly or occasionally, the highest figure high since the pandemic. Of course, Spain is still very far from the European average. According to EurostatIn the European Union, 22.6% of employees carry out some form of teleworking (100% remote or hybrid workday), compared to the 15.4% assigned to Spain. Countries such as the Netherlands or Sweden exceed 46% teleworking, which gives an idea of ​​the existing gap and to what extent the in-person work model continues to be dominant in the Spanish labor market. Sectors that make a difference. The gap between sectors is also enormous, although the nature of each job makes it logical. IT and telecommunications is the most favorable field for remote work, with 68% of its vacancies including the teleworking option. This is followed by the legal sector with 59% and the finance and banking sector with 51% of vacancies with teleworking. At the opposite extreme are the sectors where presence is simply inevitable: logistics and warehouse, health, tourism and restaurants or retail sales. The study hardly sees any differences in the number of vacancies with teleworking with respect to the size of the companies, which indicates that it is a factor that depends more on the sector to which it belongs than on the number of workers that form it. Madrid and Barcelona, ​​​​in another league. The geographical distribution teleworking is not homogeneous either. Madrid reaches 40% of all vacancies with some remote modality published in 2025. Catalonia follows, with 19% of vacancies with teleworking, followed by Andalusia with 11% and the Valencian Community with 7%. There is a quite logical reason behind these data: Madrid and Barcelona concentrate most of the corporate headquarters, consulting firms, offices and technology companies in the country, the sectors with the greatest compatibility with remote work. This pattern coincides with what the INE already recorded after the pandemic, when teleworking skyrocketed especially in Madrid and Catalonia compared to the rest of the communities. In Xataka | Working from anywhere was the dream of teleworking: not notifying those location changes can get you fired Image | Unsplash (Rodeo Project Management Software)

Apple Music will come to the app to offer the next step

TikTok has become more than just a platform for short videos: for millions of people it is the place where they discover new music. Songs that appear in “Para ti” can go from being a viral fragment to becoming a global hit in a matter of hours. That role as a great musical showcase has redefined how songs are released and promoted in the industry. Apple Music seems to have taken note of that dynamic and is now committed to going one step beyond discovery. The novelty. “Play Full Song” seeks to shorten the journey between the moment someone discovers a song on TikTok and the moment they decide to listen to it in its entirety. From now on, Apple Music subscribers will see a dedicated button on their “For You” or sound details page, from which they can open an Apple Music player to listen to the full track. By tapping it, the user can play the track and continue listening to recommendations within the service. TikTok also adds that users will be able to save songs in “Your Music” and add them directly to their Apple Music lists. An agreement that goes through Apple Music. Although the button appears within TikTok, the complete playback is not done on the social network itself. The function uses MusicKit, Apple’s technology that allows you to integrate your catalog into other applications, so the song is played in Apple Music and listens are counted in that service. The important detail is that the integration is linked only to Apple Music. According to TechCrunchother streaming services, including Spotify, do not currently have an equivalent option to listen to full songs from TikTok. This integration does not appear in a vacuum. TikTok has been incorporating tools designed to connect the virality of its videos with streaming platforms for some time. One of them is “Add to music app”, a function that allows you to save songs discovered on TikTok directly to music services to listen to later. In parallel, the company has also explored other paths, such as its attempt to launch its own streaming service, an initiative that ended up closing. Since then, the strategy seems to focus on reinforcing its role as a discovery point that connects with other platforms. Music is also heard in community. The announcement also includes a feature called “Listening Party,” designed to bring artists and fans together for a shared listening session. During these sessions, fans can listen to songs in real time while interacting with each other and the artist themselves. TikTok describes the initiative as a new social way to experience music within the platform. Together, these tools aim at the same objective: reinforcing TikTok’s role as a meeting point between musical discovery, reproduction and direct relationship between artists and audience. Images | TikTok In Xataka | Netflix spends 17 billion on producing content and YouTube does it for free. And that’s why YouTube is winning the game

The US threatened to take the Rota base to Morocco. Spain has buried it with an unbeatable offer: more territory

Since the Madrid Pacts Since 1953, the US military presence in southern Spain has been one of the silent pillars of Western security architecture. Throughout the Cold War, the crises in the Mediterranean and the successive enlargements of NATO, this relationship has survived changes of government, diplomatic tensions and strategic redefinitions without losing its structural weight. Therefore, an idea that had gained strength It worried Spain. The threat that shook the board. It happened in the summer of 2025, when from circles close to the Republican Party slipped the idea of ​​moving the Rota and Morón bases to Morocco in response to the Spanish refusal to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP. As the days passed, the debate stopped being rhetorical and became a strategic question of first order. The proposal suggested that Washington could punish an ally considered insufficiently committed by relocating key assets to the Maghreb, in a context of increasing US support for Rabat and internal tensions in NATO over burden sharing. However, beyond the political noise, the real viability of this maneuver depended on much deeper factors than a simple temporary decision. The first reason: anti-missile shields. Rota is not an interchangeable base, but an essential node of the NATO missile shield together with Romania and Poland, integrated into a system of sensors, radars, satellites and command centers that requires millimeter coordination and reaction times of between five and twenty-five minutes. Not only that. Also houses Aegis destroyers equipped with SM-3 missiles and is part of the technical framework whose nerve center is in Germany, all in allied territory fully integrated into the Atlantic Alliance. The simple idea of ​​moving that capacity to Morocco would imply rebuild from scratch critical infrastructures, redesign the legal and operational framework and, above all, locate sensitive parts of the system in a country that does not belong to NATO, with the legal and political complications that this entails. Morocco is not NATO territory. Rabat has offered in the past ports and military facilitiesand its weight as a strategic partner in the Maghreb and the Sahel has grown exponentially hand in hand with US support for the Sahara and normalization with Israel. However, it is one thing to strengthen cooperation and quite another to replace a structural base already established by facilities outside the allied legal and military umbrella. They remembered in Infodefensa that implementing equivalent capabilities there would require extremely complex bilateral agreements, multimillion-dollar investments and institutional guarantees difficult to match those of a European partner, in addition to altering the logistical balance that allows the United States Navy operate with continuity in the Mediterranean, the eastern Atlantic and Africa. A second irrefutable reason. As they said this morning in Spanishfar from reducing its weight, Rota has begun an expansion valued at more than 400 million of euros, a work that involves new docks, semi-buried magazines and maintenance contracts that can reach 90 million annually with up to six destroyers deployed. In this way, Spain has not only authorized the increase from four to six Aegis vessels, but is adapting the infrastructure to double docking capacity and consolidate the base as a high-tech anti-aircraft and anti-submarine node. In political and strategic terms, the operation amounts to a kind of reinforced transfer of territory and operational sovereignty, although assuming, of course, that the base converts Spanish soil into a potential target in the event of conflict. Broken as a structural piece. In short, the presence of thousands of American soldiers, the agreed ceiling in the bilateral agreement and the local economic impact show a relationship that transcends governments and cycles politicians. So that the hypothesis of a transfer If Morocco were to be moderately credible, clear signs of withdrawal should be observed, such as a reduction in ships or a halt in investments, and the truth is that exactly the opposite is happening. There was already a compelling reason why the United States could not take the base to Morocco: its irreplaceable integration in the NATO architecture. And now Spain has just added a second one that is even more difficult to ignore, by reinforcing and expanding that presence with investments and effective transfer of strategic space that consolidate the Rota base. as a structural piece of Washington’s device in Europe. Image | NavyUS Navy In Xataka | In 1953 the United States decided to put a naval base in Rota. Now the facility looks to its future with uncertainty In Xataka | If the question is whether Spain can deny the US its bases to provide air support to Israel, the answer is not so simple.

This is Movistar’s offer without permanence

The greater the competitiveness among telecom companies, the greater the offers and discounts they launch. It is great news for us, as we have very good options to choose from if we are looking to have fiber, telephone and other services at home. That’s exactly where this offer from Movistar comes in: you can get its 300 Mb symmetrical fiber optic for 19.90 euros per month for a year and get, for only five euros more, Movistar Plus+. And be careful: without permanence. Fiber and Movistar Plus+ for less than 25 euros Let’s see the rate. First of all, the price: this normally costs 30 euros, so we are looking at a 30% discount. It is true that it is only for one year, but since it does not have permanence, we can unsubscribe at any time. There are 300 Mb of symmetrical speed that include unlimited calls to landlines and 50 minutes per month to mobile phones with Smart WiFi 6 Router including. To this, we must add Movistar Plus+. The platform is priced at 9.99 euros per month (or 99.90 euros per year), but if we add it to the fiber rate, we will have it for only 5 euros per month, so we would be paying only 24.90 euros per month to have fiber, telephone and a streaming platform that broadcasts a LaLiga match every day and many other sporting events. ⚡ IN SUMMARY: Movistar fiber offer today ✅ THE BEST Good price (without permanence): With the offer, the price of Movistar fiber remains at a very competitive price. And whenever we want, we can unsubscribe without problem. Movistar Plus+ at half price: Having movies, series and even football for only 5 euros a month is amazing. ❌ THE WORST For 12 months only: This price is only valid for one year, so it is an offer with an expiration date. 300 Mb is too short for you: For many users, symmetrical 300 Mb may be a great fit. Now, it is not a speed for everyone. 💡 BUY IT IF… You are looking for a fiber with a very good technical service and that includes a platform with movies, series and football for a little more per month. ⛔ DON’T BUY IT IF… Do you prefer a more long-term offer so as not to worry about increases or you are not interested in Movistar Plus+ at all. You can also contract Movistar Plus+ separately You may be interested in Movistar Plus+, but prefer to opt for a different fiber offer. No problem: this streaming platform It can be contracted regardless of the operator we arewithout having to take another Movistar product. The price is 9.99 euros per month, as we said above, but one thing must be taken into account: you can share it with another person without a problem. Monthly subscription to Movistar Plus+ The price could vary. We earn commission from these links In return, we will have a huge catalog of high-quality movies and series featuring the Oscar nominee ‘Sirat‘, but also football. Without going any further, this week we will be able to see both Copa del Rey matches: Athletic-Real Sociedad (day 10) and Atlético de Madrid-Barcelona (day 11). In addition, also Real Madrid’s next match against Real Sociedad on Valentine’s Day. Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Movistar In Xataka | The best streaming platforms 2025 | Comparison of Disney+, Netflix, HBO Max, Prime Video, Movistar Plus+, Filmin, Apple TV, SkyShowtime and Rakuten TV: catalog, functions and prices In Xataka | Best televisions in quality price. Which one to buy and seven recommended 4K smart TVs

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.