Mobile Tech & Gadgets

Meta was the big loser of the AI ​​race in 2025. She was actually preparing her big move

by

Meta wasn’t dead, but she wasn’t partying either. He was working hard on a new AI model for which there are huge expectations. Now we know a little more about that project, but one thing doesn’t change: it better not fail. what has happened. Andrew Bossworth, CTO of Meta, has confirmed during the World Economic Forum in Davos that the Superintelligence Labs division already has a first internal version of its new AI models. This is an important and long-awaited milestone that they have been working on for six months. “Very good”, but not ready yet. Bossworth did not want to give too many details, but he did indicate that preliminary tests show that the models perform very well. These models will still take time to come to market: Meta is currently in a critical post-training phase for these models to be truly useful for both internal developers and end users. Two great models. Although the names of those models were not specified, rumors and leaks point to two major developments. On the one hand, Avocado, focused on text and which could be launched in the first quarter of 2026. On the other, Mango, focused on image and video generation. A 2025 of transition. The manager described the year 2025 as “tremendously chaotic”, and it was certainly a very complicated year for Meta. He Llama 4 failure It made the company completely change its philosophy and strategy. Zuckerberg did not stop hire talent with a exorbitant costespecially when it acquired Scale AI and signed its CEO, Alexandr Wangnow head of Superintelligence Labs. That investment has also been allocated to acquire companies like Manusthat could become another key component of Meta’s strategy going forward. Glasses as an AI device. If they behave as expected, these models will probably also end up being used in smart glasses from Meta, which has been collaborating with Ray-Ban for years and which you have just seen its second version accompanied, of course, by the striking and even more versatile Meta Ray-Ban Display. Interaction with AI models is one of the most striking features, and these models could take it to new limits. The mystery of Open Source. In July 2024 Mark Zuckerberg indicated that “Open Source AI is the way to go.” Llama was at that time the clear reference, but the disappointing launch of Llama 4 and above all the push for open models from various Chinese companies has made this panorama change significantly. It is not clear that Meta will launch its new models with open versions, and if it did not do so, Chinese hegemony would be even more notable. Will it be worth the investment? Meta is one of the companies that has spent (or bet) the most money on the future of AI. Mark Zuckerberg said that I was willing to lose “hundreds of billions of dollars in AI” because not investing them would be even more dangerous for Meta. He has been consistent with that statement, but It remains to be seen if it ends up working.. The company certainly has the resources to be a protagonist in this market, but today its solutions—with Meta AI at the head—have a very reduced role compared to that of their competitors. Image | Goal In Xataka | China’s best kept weapon in AI is not Qwen: it is the more than 100,000 variables created by other companies

TikTok has dodged the bullet of the US veto. Although it has not been free

by

TikTok has announced through a press release the creation of a new one joint venture with which it seeks to meet the demands of the United States Government. This operation will give rise to a new subsidiary majority controlled by a group of American investors close to the president of the country. The agreement. TikTok now operates in the United States under a new entity, TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC. The joint venture allows Bytedance to retain 19.9% ​​of the new company, with the rest under the control of three companies: Oracle, Silver Lake Management and MGX. The constitution of the new subsidiary will allow TikTok to continue operating normally in the country, complying with the executive order signed by Trump on September 25, 2025. The data. The main objective of the Joint Venture is to meet Trump’s demands. That user data remained in the United States was one of the main ones. “The majority U.S.-owned joint venture will operate under defined safeguards that protect national security through comprehensive data protections, algorithm security, content moderation, and software safeguards for U.S. users.” The algorithm. The content recommendation algorithm will be updated in the United States, leaving it in the hands of the joint company. The Oracle cloud will be in charge of ensuring this, and it will be specifically designed to make recommendations based on data from American users. Although the United States has gained access to the algorithm, it is not done with your property. Bytedance licenses, but does not sell its most valuable asset. Qor what is important. The fight between TikTok and the United States was not a whim, it was a geopolitical war around one of the most important social networks for China. trump even banned the application in the United Statesafter considering it a “risk to national security” in 2024, throwing a dart at Bytedance with a Protecting Americans from Applications Controlled by Foreign Adversaries Act made to measure. Within hours of completely shutting down, the president extended the deadline for the vetoin order to reach an agreement. Trump made it clear that, if China wanted reduce its tariff burden, the price to pay was TikTok. During 2025, the future of the social network was up in the air. Neither winners nor losers. There are two sides to this new agreement between China and the United States. For Bytedance, TikTok is not important in the United States only because of its unique users (less than 10% of its global base): it is also important because the bulk of creators that feed their algorithm from the country. Although it loses participation in TikTok in the United States, it maintains a user base. Maintains algorithm. Resolves tension without giving up one of your most precious assets. On the United States side, although it has not been able to take over the app 100%, it achieves one of its main objectives: that user data stays in the country. In Xataka | Young people have decided to stop posting (so much) on Facebook and Instagram. “AI-generated garbage” has free rein

It’s called NexPhone and it wants to be your next pocket PC

by

I have once fantasized about the idea that my phone could run Windows or Linux natively. I think everyone who has been tinkering with gadgets for a while has thought about it at some point. However, there are currently no serious commercial proposals beyond similar projects such as PinePhone either Libremto give some examples. Nex Computer, known for its concept NexDock that turns smartphones into laptops, wants to change that. The company just presented the NexPhone– A mid-range Android phone capable of also booting Windows 11 and Linux. Below these lines we tell you all the details. What makes the NexPhone different. The NexPhone’s focus is not on being a mobile phone that runs desktop applications like they do Samsung DeX either Android 16 desktop feature. The thing goes further, as it allows three complete operating systems to boot: Android 16 as standard, Debian Linux (which runs as an app) and Windows 11 via dual-boot. When connecting the device to an external monitor via USB-Cthe NexPhone offers a complete desktop environment on any of these systems. The Windows trick. The greatest technical curiosity of the NexPhone is its ability to run full Windows 11. To use it, you need to restart your phone in Windows mode, and when you do, you are greeted with an interface that pays homage to the defunct Windows Phone. According to Emre Kosmaz, founder of Nex Computer, they had to build this mobile interface using progressive web applications, since Microsoft discontinued support for Android on Windows in March 2025. But the real usefulness is not to run Windows from the mobile screen, but to connect the device to a monitor to have a complete PC experience. An unconventional processor. The NexPhone features the Qualcomm QCM6490, a chip originally designed for IoT applications and enterprise devices. It is a variant of the Snapdragon 780G from the end of 2021, which places its power in the mid-range. Kosmaz explains They chose this processor because it offers native support for Android, Linux and Windows, something they did not find in more powerful chips aimed at smartphones. Microsoft lists it as an officially compatible platform with Windows 11, and Qualcomm guarantees updates until 2036. There are limitations. Running Windows 11 smoothly requires much more power than Android or Linux. Although the device has 12 GB of RAM, we will have to see how a 2021 mid-range processor can offer a fluid and agile Windows experience, beyond basic tasks such as checking email or browsing the internet. There is also the issue of the battery, since 5,000 mAh may not be enough for a complete desktop operating system running. However, we will have to wait to find out how the experience is. The rest of the specifications. Beyond its peculiar multi-system capacity, the NexPhone offers a 6.58-inch LCD screen with Full HD+ resolution at 120 Hz, 64 MP main camera with Sony IMX787 sensor, wireless charging, and IP68 and IP69 certification for water and dust resistance. It has a design that resembles that type of more robust mobile phone, meeting the MIL-STD-810H military standard, with a polycarbonate finish and non-slip texture. The set weighs 256 grams and measures 13.1 mm thick, so it is not exactly compact or light. Prices. Nex Computer has already opened the reservation period with a refundable deposit of $199. The final price of the NexPhone will be $549, and the company hopes to begin shipping in the third quarter of 2026. If you have a mobile phone and a computer in one device, it is not a crazy price. It remains to be seen how it works. Cover image | Nex In Xataka | We will increasingly see more “verified” SMS against fraud. The important thing is to understand how they really work

Hyundai imagines factories full of humanoid robots. A Korean union has said ‘not so fast’

by

Hyundai has been building a very specific story for months about the future of its factories, one in which humanoid robots go from being a distant promise to a real industrial tool. The image is powerful and connects with a global race to automate increasingly complex processes, but in South Korea that discourse has already found its first limit. Even before robots enter production lines, the union has come forward to make its position clear and warn that any changes that impact employment will have to be negotiated. A clear warning. Hyundai Motor Union has made it clear that “Without an agreement between the company and workers, not a single robot can enter South Korean plants,” stressing that any decision with an impact on employment must go through the negotiation table. The message connects directly with the current collective agreement, which requires all measures that affect work to be subject to debate and joint approval. With this positioning, the introduction of humanoids is emerging as one of the possible reasons for friction between worker representatives and the Asian corporation. Fear that South Korea will lose prominence. The union links automation to a broader movement of industrial reorganization, marked by the growth of manufacturing in the United States. As they explain, the planned increase in capacity at the US plant could end up subtracting volume from factories in South Korea, and they maintain that two centers would already be suffering from a lack of workload. In this context, humanoids are interpreted not only as a technological tool, but as an element that can accelerate job adjustments if it is not accompanied by clear guarantees regarding the maintenance of employment. The starting point of the discussion. This comes after Hyundai introduced Atlas, the humanoid robot developed by Boston Dynamicsas a key piece of its medium-term industrial strategy. The firm assured that it plans to progressively integrate it into its global network of factories starting in 2028. It also explained that these robots are designed to take on general industrial tasks and work alongside people, with the aim of reducing physical effort and taking on potentially dangerous jobs. Of course, he avoided specifying how many units he will deploy in the first phase or how much the project will cost. First in the United States. The manufacturer has already begun to draw how it wants to industrialize this bet. The group has explained that it will build a specific plant in the United States for the production of robots, a factory dedicated to producing Atlas on a large scale in the coming years. The first operational destination would be at the Georgia plant, known as HMGMAwhere humanoids would initially be used in very specific tasks, such as classifying and sequencing parts for the assembly line. The small labor print. Hyundai’s commitment is part of a much broader race to bring humanoid robots to the industry. Companies such as Tesla, Amazon or the Chinese manufacturer BYD have announced similar plans, although with different degrees of maturity. Some projects have already gone from demonstration to real work, such as the robot Figure 01 in a BMW plantwhere he performs support tasks autonomously. These are still limited and highly supervised experiences, but sufficient to show that the leap from the laboratory to the factory has already begun. Images | hyundai In Xataka | 100% autonomous factories where it is not necessary to turn on the light: China is already considering manufacturing cars only with robots in 2030

Until now, launching satellites was the business. The US has just turned its exorbitant cost into a million-dollar opportunity

by

For years, the space business has revolved around a very specific idea: launch more satellites, faster and cheaper. The race to fill low Earth orbit with large constellations has skyrocketed demand and turned takeoff into a multibillion-dollar industry, but it has also brought to the table a problem that for a long time remained in the background: what to do with these satellites when they reach the end of their useful life and continue to take up space in orbit. In this context, the United States has taken a decisive step by promoting and beginning to materialize the exorbitant market. New business on the horizon. This step forward has already resulted in a concrete contract. Starfish Space has been awarded of an agreement valued at 52.5 million dollars by the Space Development Agency (SDA) of the United States Space Force to offer a service for deorbiting satellites at the end of their useful life. The assignment includes the development, launch and operation of the otter ship in low orbit intended to deorbit satellites of the PWSA when they are no longer operational, with a first operation and the possibility of carrying out several more. The launch is planned for 2027. behind the scenes. This shift cannot be understood without the economic context that has turned space into a high-volume industry. Global space launch services market reached $21.19 billion by 2025 and, according to estimates by Precedence Researchcould climb to 70,560 million in 2035, with a compound annual growth rate of 11.56%. A substantial portion of that revenue comes from continuous satellite deployment, driven by constellations that require frequent launches to maintain and renew their in-orbit networks. An increasingly saturated orbit. Having thousands of satellites operating at the same time is not only a question of deployment, but also of end-of-cycle management. Those responsible for large constellations must decide whether to deorbit their satellites relatively early to limit the risk of orbital debris or whether to keep them active for as long as possible to extract their full economic and operational value. This tension, without a simple solution, has become one of the main drivers that push us to search for new formulas to manage the end of life in orbit. What changes with “deorbit-as-a-service”. Starfish’s proposal is based on separating the end of life of the satellite from its design and daily operation, allowing an external spacecraft to be responsible for deorbiting without requiring prior modifications to the devices in orbit. The company maintains that this approach allows operators to maximize the useful life of their constellations and delegate the retirement of those satellites that cannot deorbit themselves. The previous step. Although the deorbit mission has not yet launched, Starfish Space comes to this point with a previous history of in-orbit demonstrations. The company launched Otter Pup 1 in June 2023 and managed to maneuver it to within 1,000 meters of a target ten months later, a relevant milestone for approach and control operations. In October, an Impulse Space Mira spacecraft used Starfish software to approach another spacecraft to within 1,250 meters, and in June 2025, Otter Pup 2 was launched with the goal of performing the first commercial docking of satellites in low orbit. The big question to answer. What is now being tested is whether satellite deorbiting can go from being an exception to becoming a recurring industrial practice. The expansion of constellations and the pressure to keep low orbit operational force us to look for solutions that do not depend solely on each individual satellite. In this context, the United States’ decision to contract this type of services offers a first sign of where the sector can evolve, although its real scope can only be measured when the first missions begin to operate. Images | Starfish Space In Xataka | Human beings have not set foot on the Moon for 54 years: the mission that aims to correct it has just entered its final phase

Europe produces more clean electricity than fossil electricity for the first time. The hard part starts now

by

For years, the European energy transition advanced without completely displacing fossil fuels. Last year marked that turning point. According to the report European Electricity Review 2026wind and solar generated 30% of EU electricity in 2025, surpassing coal, gas and oil combined for the first time, which fell to 29%. As Dr. Petrovich explains by Emberwe are facing record growth. It is not normal to go from a 20% to 30% quota in just five years, but the numbers are there. The energy map is changing: there are now 14 EU countries where wind and sun generate more than gas or coal. In this scenario, Spain, Greece or Hungary already play in the league of solar powers. Beyond statistics. The milestone does not imply that Europe has left fossil fuels behind or that gas has disappeared from the system, but rather that it changes the hierarchy of the electricity mix. For the first time, variable renewable energies come to occupy the center of the electricity mix, while fossils are relegated to a technical and security support role. According to Emberrenewable energies as a whole contributed 48% of the EU’s electricity in 2025, practically half of the total, a figure that remained stable even in a year marked by adverse weather conditions, with less wind and less rain than usual. Coal, the most polluting fuel in the system, continues its withdrawal. In 2024 it fell to 9.2% of the European electricity mix, a historical minimum compared to the almost 25% it represented a decade ago. Gas, for its part, rose slightly compared to 2024, although it is still 18% below its 2019 maximum, confirming that its role in the system is increasingly residual. This rebalancing has consequences that range beyond the energy mix: Dependence on imported fossil fuels continues to be the main source of price instability and strategic vulnerability in Europe, even outside the climate debate. Five years that changed everything. The sorpasso – as it has begun to be called in the sector – is not the result of a mild winter or a stroke of meteorological luck. It is the consequence of sustained growth, especially in solar energy, during the last decade, accelerated very notably in the last five years. According to the reportsolar generation grew by 20.1%, this being the fourth consecutive year with increases of more than 20%, an unprecedented growth rate in European energy history. In absolute terms, solar reached 369 terawatt hours (TWh), more than double that of 2020, and the annual increase in 2025 alone is equivalent to the electrical production of three French nuclear reactors. A dizzying growth. This expansion responds mainly to the installed capacity. In 2025, 65.1 GW of new solar power was added in the EU, distributed almost equally between large plants and self-consumption on rooftops. All community countries increased their solar production, and in several of them—Hungary, Cyprus, Greece, Spain and the Netherlands—the sun already provides more than 20% of national electricity. As for wind power, although more affected by the weather conditions at the beginning of the year, it remains the second largest electricity source in the EU, with 17% of the total, above gas. The system, therefore, begins to rely structurally on variable renewables, something unthinkable just a decade ago. The reverse of success: when gas continues to set the price. Despite the historic advance of wind and solar, 2025 made it clear that gas continues to have a disproportionate weight in the European electricity system, especially in price formation. According to the think tank, gas-fired electricity generation increased by 8% in the EU, mainly to compensate for the drop in hydroelectric energy caused by the drought, and this greater use of gas raised the electricity sector’s import bill to 32 billion euros, 16% more than the previous year. The impact was especially visible in the electricity markets. Ember detects that price spikes They are concentrated in the hours with the highest gas use, while the hours with abundant solar and wind tend to make electricity cheaper. In 21 European countries, wholesale prices rose in 2025, driven almost exclusively by these fossil time slots. This is where the paradox of the current system: although gas no longer dominates by volume, it continues to set the marginal price of the market at critical moments. In other words, despite the oversupply, the price structure continues to be conditioned by fossil fuel when there is a lack of wind or sun. The new energy frontier. Ember’s report devote an entire chapter to what it considers the next big front of the transition: storage and system flexibility. Without these pieces, he warns, the sorpasso runs the risk of remaining a statistical victory. This was one of the large deficits of the European transition: investing massively in generation without doing so at the same pace in networks and storage. Batteries are now emerging as the piece that connects renewable success with stable prices and security of supply. Last year, the EU exceeded 10 GW of large-scale batteries in operation for the first time, more than double that of 2023. In addition, there is a portfolio of projects that could raise that figure above 40 GW if fully implemented. The first signs are already visible in countries like Italy, where batteries have begun to cover part of the demand during peak gas hours, reducing prices and displacing fossil generation. Physical bottlenecks: European infrastructure. It is not just a question of how much energy is generated, but where it enters and how it circulates within the continent. Europe has reduced its direct dependence of Russian gas, but continues to face physical limitations in terminals, transportation networks and cross-border connections. This substitution of Russian gas has been slowed by the slowness in the construction of critical facilities, such as regasification terminals and high-capacity networks, and by the insufficient interconnection between national electrical systems. This bottleneck explains why countries with abundant renewable production, like Spain, often cannot easily export that surplus, or why the European … Read more

“Taxes for us. Taxes for the super rich”

by

Once a year, the quiet city of Davos becomes the financial and political capital of the world during the World Economic Forum in Davos. World leaders and executives from the world’s largest corporations debate for a few days the course What will the economy take? and global geopolitics. In this context, almost 400 millionaires from 24 countries have presented an open letter asking for something that, a priori, goes against their own interests: higher taxes for those who, like them, have several hundred million dollars of assets. Millionaires against their interests. The initiative of this group of millionaires it’s not new. They have been asking the economic authorities to meet in Davos on tax tightening for the richest. The difference is that this year different groups of millionaires have joined together, such as Patriotic Millionaires and Millionaires for Humanity to Oxfam to join forces and accuse the ultra-rich of capturing democracies, aggravating poverty, stopping innovations and damaging the planet with their economic control. The group denounces in its letter that this extreme wealth “has led to extreme control” for those who risk everyone’s future in exchange for obscene profits. Among the signatures on this manifesto are those of actor Mark Ruffalo, Disney heirs Abby and Tim Disney, and real estate developer Jeffrey Gural, who directly proclaim: “Taxes for us. Taxes for the super rich.” According to a poll conducted by the Patriotic Millionaires organization to G20 millionaires, 77% of those surveyed believe that the ultra-rich buy political influence, and 71% believe that this influence serves to create states of opinion in elections. More millionaires than ever. The claim coincides with a moment in which the stock market situation is generating millionaires at a frenetic pace. The report Global Wealth Report 2025 prepared by UBS revealed that 379,000 new millionaires were created in the US alone during 2024. This increase caused the world’s population of millionaires to go from 13.27 million people with more than one million dollars available to invest to more than 52 million people by the end of 2024. The concentration of wealth that has been occurring in recent years is evident. According to data According to the Federal Reserve, in the US the richest 20% of households, with an average of $4.3 million, controlled 71.1% of the total wealth in 2024. On the other hand, the poorest 50% of households, with an average of $60,000, only accounted for 2.5% of the wealth. Philanthropy falls short. Some rich people try to compensate for the imbalance in the distribution of resources with voluntary donations with initiatives such as The Giving Pledge, promoted by Warren Buffett, Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates, which has brought together more than 250 billionaires. Each of them promised to give at least half of their fortune during their lifetime or by will. However, the creators themselves recognize that these initiatives are not enough to tackle the problem. Warren Buffett confessed in his traditional letter to his shareholders that some of these philanthropic plans were frustrated by political decisions or due to the lack of consistency of donor commitment. “I have witnessed ill-conceived wealth transfers by cheap politicians, dynastic decisions and, yes, inept or peculiar philanthropists,” wrote the “oracle of Omaha in his last letter. Less taxes for millionaires. According to a study Prepared by economists from the University of California, in the US the 400 largest fortunes paid an effective tax rate of 24% between 2018 and 2020, below the 30% paid on average by the rest of taxpayers. The report concludes that this happens because capital gains on investments and certain business profits are taxed less than high salaries, allowing billionaires to reduce their real tax burden so that their income They do not depend on a salary in the companies they run or have founded, but of shares thereof. This mismatch fuels the argument of the Davos letter, which urges global and local leaders to tax large assets more. However, it is a risky request since the simple proposal of a measure that would tax California’s large fortunes at 5% has caused some of the largest fortunes to have already packed their bags for other states with more lax tax policies. In Xataka | An atoll in the South Pacific has become a magnet for millionaires. Its great attraction is not its beaches, it is its banks Image | Flickr (Fortune Live Media, Gage Skidmore)

This is how the public demonstrations will be

by

For years, the Full Self-Driving of Tesla has been a promise that advanced at different speeds depending on the country and the regulatory framework. In Europe, that future has always seemed a little more distant, but now it is beginning to take shape with concrete decisions. Tesla is not yet talking about a complete deployment, but it is talking about something tangible: allowing the public to see the system in action in Spain, while the company maintains its forecast of launching the function in Europe in early 2026. Countdown to try FSD in Spain. What Tesla has put on the table is a public and limited experience, designed to show the system as it works today. Starting January 26, customers in Spain will be able to see Full Self-Driving (Supervised) in action through tests organized in selected brand stores. The company has confirmed that these demonstrations will take place in Madrid, Barcelona, ​​Valencia, Seville and Malaga, and that the sessions can now be booked through its website. It should be noted that this is not a general activation of the system, but rather an opportunity to observe it under controlled conditions. Why now. The announcement of the demonstrations does not come in isolation, but at a time when the regulatory framework is beginning to show signs of progress. In Spain, the General Directorate of Traffic authorized at the end of 2025 tests on public roads with 19 vehicles equipped with FSD, a phase aimed at collecting data and adapting the system to European traffic. Added to this previous work is the continental context, with demonstrations already carried out in countries such as France, Italy or Germany. Another promise from Elon Musk. From Davos, Elon Musk said today that the company expects to obtain approvals for the supervised FSD in Europe “next month.” And here the Netherlands comes into play: the Dutch authority RDW expected to rule on the software in February, and Tesla has defended that this approval could facilitate recognition in other EU countries before formal approval at European level. Advanced assistance, not autonomous driving. Despite its commercial name, Full Self-Driving (Supervised) does not turn the car into a vehicle that drives itself. In the documentation that Tesla distributes about the systemthe company insists that it requires active driver supervision and does not make the vehicle autonomous. In other words, the system can take over driving tasks, but it does not replace the driver, and legal responsibility during its use is not delegated to the car. What FSD can do. In its current state, Full Self-Driving (Supervised) acts as an advanced assistant capable of performing multiple driving maneuvers on its own. According to Tesla, the system can follow routes to a destination, navigate urban streets, highways and residential roads, manage intersections and roundabouts, and automatically control steering, acceleration and braking. The company also mentions lane changes, turns and highway entrances and exits, in addition to functions related to parking, always with the driver attentive and prepared to intervene at any time. Tesla highlights safety. In its communication, Tesla accompanies these demonstrations with usage figures and safety claims. On the one hand, it maintains that Tesla owners have traveled more than 11 billion kilometers around the world with Full Self-Driving (Supervised) activated. On the other hand, it ensures that, when activated and used with active driver supervision, the system “reduces the risk of serious collisions up to seven times”, a statement that the company itself presents with notes and conditions of comparison. The last pending challenge. In any case, the main condition for a broader deployment in Europe remains the same: regulatory approval, which Tesla recognizes as a prerequisite. That is why these in-store tests fit better as a controlled demonstration and a thermometer of what is to come than as a definitive arrival. Images | tesla In Xataka | Madrid has bought so many electric cars that the DGT has ended one of its great incentives

Going to the mountains to go hiking is increasingly popular in Spain. And those who are suffering are the golden eagles

by

Go on the weekend to take a route through the countryside It is a plan that can be very playful and, above all, healthy for us humans. But… What happens to the native fauna of the area? This is a question that It’s starting to resonate a lot on the internet.by focusing on the impact that our presence in the mountains can have on the most emblematic species of Spain such as the golden eagle or the partridge that have begun to have a lesser presence. A technological solution. The main idea that was in mind was that the animals were crashing into the hikers and causing great damage to their presence on the mountain. But to solve this mystery, biologists chose to put a GPS device on the eagles to monitor what they were doing. And the reality is that they are not crashing into us, but rather they are fleeing. The result. In this way, when it is confirmed that we do not have any type of collision with the eagles that could respond to their change in behavior, we have to go where they go when we humans are in the mountains. The University of Valencia in 2019 led this investigationdetecting that without a doubt there is a “weekend effect.” This effect can be seen in telemetry data which shows that during Saturdays and Sundays, the eagles are forced to modify their hunting routes. All this to avoid humans who, among other things, may be scaring away their targets on the ground. A greater expense. When these birds have to go to other areas to look for food because of hikers, they have to cover a longer distance than they are normally used to. This only means greater physiological stress and energy expenditure that can compromise their reproduction or survival, even if they never touch a human. But in addition, this translates into a situation known as ‘Landscape of Fear’, where the animal perceives the human not as a physical obstacle, but as a potential predator, which triggers its stress and cortisol levels, affecting its ability to breed. The real threats. To understand the real danger that these birds are in, we must look at the different mortality statistics in Spain. In this case, although a sedentary lifestyle causes great discomfort to the animals, the causes of death are much more industrial and violent. According to the studies collected, such as those of the GER-EA projectthe main cause of death is collision with power lines and electrocution. This is followed by poisoning and shooting, with 13 and 8% respectively. But what is clear is that humans are not a direct cause of death due to collisions with us when we are sedentary in the countryside. Distinction matters. Stating that eagles collide with hikers may sound spectacular, but it diverts attention from the real problem that we can solve as mountain users. The study in Ecology and Evolution (2025) and data from Ecologists in Action They point out that the problem is Yontrusion into breeding areas. Climbing, off-road vehicles and off-road hiking near the nests cause the adults to abandon the nest or the chicks, leaving them exposed to the cold or predators. Images | Mathew Schwartz In Xataka | Japan has been looking at its bears in fear for months due to a record wave of attacks. Now he looks at them with something else: gluttony

Apple has been resisting turning Siri into a chatbot for years. Until the evidence has been surrendered

by

2026 will be the year of Siri, but not because of an internal turn at Apple or because of the maturity of Apple Intelligence. It will be because the pact with Google will allow Apple to use Gemini technology as your assistant’s base. The details about what Apple will do with its assistant have not taken long to come to light and, we have good news: they will arrive in the next version of iOS. The new Siri. Apple has been announcing the benefits of the new Siri since before having prepared their news. With the Apple Intelligence announcement He put on the table a Siri completely integrated into the system, capable of functioning as a complete assistant and functioning mostly locally. The reality? Everything remains practically the same as before and, when Siri doesn’t know how to respond to something, ends up opening ChatGPT. What is going to change. They explain in Bloomberg that Apple, as of iOS 27will surrender to the chatbot model that has worked so well for companies like OpenAI and Google. The mere assistant model has expired, and Siri will become a chatbot at the service of any of our requests. This new chatbot will be integrated into all Apple apps (expecting an API open to developers to integrate it into their apps), allowing us, for example, to find specific photos in the app Photosfunction as a programming assistant in Xcodeetc. What won’t change. The only certainty with the new chatbot model is that Apple will continue to maintain its obsession with privacy and maintaining its AI ecosystem as its own, even if it is based on Gemini. Apple’s intention is to integrate this experience into iPhone, iPad, Mac and Apple Watchmaintaining activation through Voice command “Siri” or holding down the power button on the iPhone. The difference. Today, Siri is an assistant, a command system. You tell him something Siri classifies the intention (set an alarm, call X person, send a message) Execute the order Moving to the chatbot model means having a generative model capable of interpreting natural language, maintaining conversations and a more “human” interaction with the phone. This is what their rivals have been doing for a few years. Adapting to the inevitable. That Siri will evolve in 2026 is proof that the classic assistant model is exhausted. Apple will have to adopt the chatbot model as an inevitable transition, previously led by OpenAI and in which Gemini now seems to be leading the way. The thing doesn’t end here. The destination of the new Siri is not only current Apple devices. As my colleague Javier Pastor says, the company plans to launch a device without a screenits first AI-focused wearable. According to the leaked information, it will have a format similar to that of AirTags, a microphone system and a launch scheduled for 2027. New assistant, new devices, and alliance with Google. The new stage of artificial intelligence for Apple is finally arriving. The question is whether they will manage to offer something new. Image | Xataka In Xataka | Hey Siri: 134 voice commands to get the most out of Apple’s assistant

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.