How to set any MP3 as a ringtone on iPhone

Let’s explain to you how to set any MP3 as a ringtone on iPhonesomething that since iOS 26 It’s as easy as two taps. For years, being able to do something this simple was a real headache for Apple users, but now it is much easier. There are only three requirements to be able to do this. First, have an iPhone updated to iOS 26, and secondly have the MP3 saved on your mobileto be able to access it from the application Files. Thirdly, the MP3 cannot last more than 30 seconds, so you will have to resort to pages like mp3cut.net to cut it out. Any MP3 as ringtone The first thing you have to do is enter the application Files and navigate to the folder where you have the MP3 file you want to use. Hold your finger on it to display the pop-up menu, and click on the option Share that will appear at the top. A menu will appear with the classic sharing options, including contacts and featured applications. Here, press the button See more to display additional options. When the additional options appear, click on Use as ringtone. And that’s it, with this you can make the MP3 be used as a ringtone. There is a limit to the MP3s you can use. This is something you should keep in mind, because not all of them are valid. The MP3 must be less than 30 seconds or iOS will tell you that it is too big. Therefore, you will have to resort to pages like mp3cut.net to cut it out. In Xataka Basics | iOS 26: 19 functions and some tricks to get the most out of the new operating system for your iPhone

We believed that the brain evolved to be rational. Science has a much more uncomfortable answer

We love to think of ourselves as deeply logical beings, since after all, we call ourselves Homo sapienswhich can be translated as the ‘man who thinks’. When we make a decision, from what car to buy to who to vote for, we like to believe we’ve weighed the pros and cons with the coolness of an algorithm. But biological reality acts as a bucket of cold water by pointing out that our mind has evolved to survivenot to think rationally. The myth of the logic machine. To understand why we sometimes make decisions that seem absurd or get carried away by cognitive biases, we must look to our evolutionary past. The classics of modern evolutionary psychology, driven by figures such as Leda Cosmides and John Tooby, established a fundamental basis when seeing that our current cognitive mechanisms were forged in ancestral environments. Here we must bear in mind that in the savanna, stopping to statistically calculate the probability that a rustling in the undergrowth was a lion or simply the wind was a recipe that could end with almost certain death. The one who survived was the one who ran away without thinking rationally. It is not exclusive. This decision-making architecture is not unique to us, since science has already traced the evolutionary roots of our decisions. comparing us with non-human primates. The result is that monkeys also display economic biases and irrationalities similar to ours, demonstrating that many of our logical “errors” are hardwired into our evolutionary lineage. Minimal effort. If we are not rational in the strict sense, what are we? This is where one of the most interesting concepts in recent cognitive science comes in, pointing to an idea that changes the way we see ourselves: “resource rationality.” According to this modelthe human mind is not irrational, but hyperefficient, since the brain consumes an enormous amount of energy and time is always limited. With this premise, what our mind does is optimize our decisions taking into account the limited resources available to it. This causes us to take mental shortcuts and make biases because processing all the information perfectly would be a slow and exhausting process. In other words, the brain prefers a quick, “good enough” decision that keeps us alive, over a logically perfect decision that leaves us paralyzed analyzing data. Think to justify ourselves. In a 2021 article published in American Psychologistit is argued that humans are not nearly as “rational” as we tend to believe, and they suggest that rationalization itself may be a human adaptation. Often, we do not use our intellect to arrive at objective truth, but rather to justify decisions we have already made emotionally or intuitively. In a complex social environment, having the ability to convince others, justify our behavior, and coordinate group action was much more useful for social survival than being a solitary, purely objective thinker. We are adapting. All of this does not mean that we have a “broken” mind, but rather that science suggests that our mental processes should be judged not by whether they comply with textbook laws of probability, but by how well they function in the real, physical environment in which we operate. In short, it is not that we are incapable of reasons but that human rationality is limited, contextual and tremendously practical. We were not designed by evolution to pass formal logic exams or to be perfect algorithms with no margin for error. We were designed to make decisions that, with the incomplete information and limited time we have, allow us to see a new dawn. Images | Wes Hicks In Xataka | We had always believed that evolution had been arrested for thousands of years. The redheads were telling us the opposite

Europe forces Google to open Android to ChatGPT and Claude, but the blow is that it will have to give up its search engine data to the competition

The European Commission has ordered Google to open two of its greatest competitive advantages– Android’s access to rival AI assistants and the search data that feeds Gemini. They are two binding measures under the Digital Markets Act (DMA)adopted on July 16. Android must be open by July 2027, search data by January 2027, and no resources are stopping those deadlines. In detail. The first measure affects how a rival assistant can live inside Android. Right now, Gemini has privileges that no competitor shares: Keyword activation at the operating system level, not the application level. Access to the home button or navigation gesture as a gateway. Reading content on screen to respond with context. Executing tasks within other applications, such as sending an email or sharing a photo. Priority access to hardware and AI models built into the device. There are 11 points in total. Starting with the next major version of Android, ChatGPT, Claude or any other attendee will be able to claim the same treatment that only they have today Gemini. The second measure is the one that weighs the most for the business: the data of queries, clicks and results with which Google trains a good part of its LLM. From January 2027, rivals such as OpenAI will be able to access an anonymized version, under conditions that Brussels demands are fair and non-discriminatory. Google’s waterline. Between the lines. Google completed a few months ago the transition from Google Assistant to Gemini as Android’s default assistant, just before Brussels opened the file. The order arrived with Gemini already installed as a part of the system and not as just another application. Apple chose the opposite path: it negotiated before launching, proposed a monitored permit system and Brussels rejected it. Siri AI It still hasn’t reached the iPhone in the European Union. Google launched Gemini without asking permission and has discussed the conditions afterwards, with better results. Yes, but. Google, like Apple, alleges security and privacy reasons. Its head of global affairs, Kent Walker, has explained that opening screen reading and the execution of tasks between applications to any external service bypasses the filter that the manufacturers themselves apply today before granting these permissions. And now what. Google will appeal, but the appeal does not give it extra time: from the criteria established in the Apple case, the obligation is fulfilled while it is discussed whether it was legal to impose it. The United Kingdom and Japan, which are preparing their own digital competency frameworks, are presumably taking note of how “fair access” to a mobile is defined here. What Brussels sets about wake words or search data prices will not remain only in Europe. In Xataka | AI has destroyed traditional captchas. Google’s solution requires scanning a QR… and having its services installed Featured image | Xataka

Your AI advantage is evaporating

Chinese AI companies are throwing it away. After the launch of the promising Kimi K3, now Alibaba has just introduce Qwen 3.8a gigantic model that according to those responsible is so powerful that only Fable 5 manages to surpass it. If that is confirmed, we will be facing a potential turning point in the AI ​​race. One in which China will no longer be months away. A fearsome rival for GPT-5.6 and Fable 5. Qwen 3.8 Mac has 2.4 trillion parameters, placing it only “slightly” behind the also gigantic Kimi K3 which we learned about last week and which has 2.8 billion parameters. Developers can now begin testing the model through Alibaba’s Qoder programming platform, and those responsible for it have announced that they will release their weights soon. Alibaba’s message is quite a challenge, because they claim that only Fable 5 manages to exceed their capacity. That’s saying a lot… or maybe not. All unknowns. The truth is that this is a preliminary presentation because the availability of the model is very limited. In fact, the company has not even published internal benchmarks and that makes it difficult to validate such claims. Some users have shared theoretical results of the behavior of Qwen 3.8 and according to said data it does seem that we are facing a prodigious model, but one that is also unknown details such as cost or efficiency. Meanwhile, Kimi K3 already shows his power. The launch comes just days after Kimi K3 have managed to overcome to Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol in certain specific tests of the Arena.ai benchmark platform. It also surpassed Opus 4.8 in the text generation test classification, something equally striking, especially if we take into account that the Chinese model costs 40% less. The demand for Kimi K3 has been so high that Moonshot AI has had to announce that for now need to cancel new subscriptions to deal with the enormous amount of requests that their servers are receiving. GLM 5.2 had already struck its own blow. We have had a very busy summer in terms of new AI models from the Far East. In June The big surprise was carried out by GLM-5.2the open Zhipu AI model that with its 744 billion parameters managed to be on par with Opus 4.8 at a fraction of its price. This model left behind all its Chinese competitors at the time (MiniMax, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K2.6), and began to make it clear that China had “a Mythos at home”. The pattern that begins to be drawn. Neither GLM-5.2, nor Kimi K3 later nor now Qwen 3.8 need to be the best models in the world to change the rules of the game: for companies and developers, having access to a model that performs almost like the best, that costs (sometimes much) less and that can even be installed in their own systems because they are open models can be more attractive than paying for the very expensive frontier models from OpenAI or Anthropic. Each launch actually calls into question the exorbitant amounts these companies are investing in ever larger data centers. Alibaba scores the same. The Chinese company will have to confirm with data that Qwen 3.8 really is as good as they say, but for now they have already achieved a relevant victory: the Beijing government approved Apple Intelligence, and will allow iPhones, iPads and Macs to use said technology in the Asian giant with a very special detail: the AI ​​models used will be from Alibabanot from Google. I distill, you distill, he distills. And while all this is happening, Anthropic accuse Moonshot and other Chinese companies to “distill” their models on an industrial scale to develop their own proposals. That is to say: they claim that if the Chinese models are so good it is because they are doing a kind of reverse engineering on models like Claude Opus 4.8, for example. But the fact that many Chinese models are open has also allowed US companies to take advantage of these models for all types of projects, including specific models. like Composer 2.5 from Cursor or the new Inkling from Thinking Machines that It is based on DeepSeek-V3. The gap disappears. The launch of these models demonstrates that the gap between Chinese and American AI models has narrowed significantly. Not long ago it was said that it took China about six months to match the capacity of US models, but these developments make it clear that now it only takes a few weeks before models comparable in performance appear, but with open weights and a reduced cost. If the race was already getting interesting, now it gets fascinating. In Xataka | A company decided to give the keys to its systems to an AI agent. The AI ​​agent deleted its entire database

why 4 GB + extra 4 GB will never work like real 8 GB

Surely you already know: the price of RAM memory is through the roof. Even if we focus only on mobile, This is something that has many implications.. In fact, everything indicates that very soon we will begin to see entry-level or very cheap mobile phones with 4 GB of RAMsomething that seemed to have been forgotten (because 6 GB was already the standard for these phones). As with almost any device, the RAM memory It is a key point in the operation of a mobile phone. Having little can be an ordeal on a day-to-day basis, especially if we take into account that you cannot open your phone and put more RAM in it as you could on a PC. That’s where what is known as virtual RAM comes in.a “trick” that manufacturers use on these cheap phones with little memory. Is it of any use? Let’s see it. Why is RAM memory so important in a mobile phone? Before delving into this, let’s stop for a moment to understand Why is RAM memory so relevant in a mobile phone?. Your mobile phone, laptop or tablet has two types of memory: there is storage on the one hand and, on the other, RAM. Both are used to store information, but in a very different way. In fact, these two memories are also different from each other: the storage has more capacity, but the RAM is much faster. That speed is the key. The phone’s processor is working all the time and needs to access information for any process. If it depended solely and exclusively on storage for this, its performance would be much slower. RAM memory comes into play right there and allows the processor to write and read information much faster. But of course, as we said above, what is saved in RAM is only there temporarily. And it is there temporarily because the capacity of this memory is much smaller. The device uses RAM constantly for all types of processes. If you have low RAM, performance suffers. For that reason and to get straight to the point, yes: the more RAM memory your phone has, the better. And that is why virtual RAM exists. Small note. As with PC RAM, there are different types of memory. For computers, the type of RAM memory is identified by the acronym DDR, but the one used by mobile phones is called LPDDR. In essence, this type of memory takes up less space and consumes less battery than DDRwhich is why it is used for mobile phones. Now, how do you know what type of memory a certain mobile uses? They all begin with LPDDR and it is what follows after these letters that tells us what generation this memory is from. LPDDR3 is still found in some very low-end mobile phones, but the current standard is LPDDR5 (and LPDDR5X is already starting); LPDDR4/4X is also present in the mid-range. Virtual RAM: is it what manufacturers promise? Now knowing how RAM works, it is easier to understand what virtual RAM does and what it is for. As its name indicates, it is not physical memory (that is, it is not a component inside your mobile). So how does it work? Well, it’s very simple to understand: if you activate it, Your mobile will take a part of the storage and use it as RAM memory. This, on paper, sounds great. Many manufacturers use this technique to supply a low amount of RAM (usually between 4 and 6 GB). It is very possible that you will see this option with a different name depending on the manufacturer of your phone, since each one calls it a different way. Samsung, for example, calls it ‘RAM Plus‘. Now, as we have already explained above, the storage speed is not even remotely close to that of RAM memory, so it’s not a miracle solution. Of course, we are not saying that it is useless. Virtual RAM can help your phone have an “extra” that allows it to have more apps open in the background or that these are not closed forcefullysomething that usually happens if we demand a lot from a mobile phone with little RAM. And does it have any “side effects” for our mobile? The most obvious one is that we’re obviously going to lose a little bit of storage if we turn it on. However, that may not be the most important thing. By activating this option, the use of virtual RAM increases the writing to storage (flash), which can accelerate wear. In practice, the impact is limited on modern devices with good management, but it exists. Two mobile phones for less than 310 euros with which virtual RAM is not so necessary POCO X7 Pro I no longer recommend mobile phones with less than 8 GB of RAM and if you are looking for one with a good quality-price ratio, there are few better options than the POCO X7 Pro. It is true that it already has a successor, but since it has only been in stores for a short time, it has not yet dropped that much in price. For that very reason, This is a top option if you are looking to not spend more than 250 euros. This Xiaomi phone has 8 GB of RAM in this configuration and 256 GB of storage. In addition, it has a 6,000 mAh battery that is not as big as others we are seeing now (nor like the POCO X8 Pro Max), but it should give you about two days of autonomy. As we explained in its analysis, it also offers very good performance. Xiaomi Poco The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Realme 16 Pro If you can stretch your budget a little further, then don’t lose sight of the Realme 16 Pro 5G. It is a phone that does not reach 280 euros right now and it also has 8 GB of RAM. There is also … Read more

The best technology deals we found today (July 20) on Amazon

We’re starting a new week and it’s a good time to compile some of the best technology deals we’ve found on Amazon today, July 20. From the new Huawei FreeClip 2 to sound bars, these are the five best deals of the day in the e-commerce giant. Hisense HS2100 – Sound Bar 2.1, 240W The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Wireless headphones Huawei FreeClip 2 by 169 euros: with slope-shaped design. smartphone Xiaomi 17 Ultra by 1,249.99 euros: with Leica cameras and AMOLED screen. smart watch Apple Watch Series 11 by 349 euros: with Always-On screen and more stylized design. Pack of two smart plugs Tapo P110 by 17.99 euros: with energy monitoring and compatible with voice assistants. sound bar Hisense HS2100 by 88.09 euros: with 240 W of power and Bluetooth 5.3 and HDMI ARC connectivity. Huawei FreeClip 2 Wireless Headphones The Huawei FreeClip 2 (now reduced to 169 euros) are revolutionary wireless open-ear headphones, ideal for those looking for absolute comfort. They stand out for their innovative C-shaped bridge design, which holds firmly to the ear like an earring without entering the ear canal. Besides, these headphones They offer clean sound quality with reverse sound wave technology to prevent audio leaks, automatic left/right ear recognition and a brutal autonomy that reaches up to 38 hours together with its charging case. HUAWEI FreeClip 2 Bluetooth Headphones The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Xiaomi 17 Ultra Smartphone He Xiaomi 17 Ultra It is a smartphone designed for mobile photography and the most ambitious flagship of the Chinese firm for those looking for the maximum power in the world and now it is reduced to 1,249.99 euros. It stands out for its revolutionary camera system co-developed with Leicawhich incorporates state-of-the-art sensors capable of capturing a professional level of detail and dynamic range in any lighting condition. In addition, it has a good AMOLED screen with ultra-sharp resolution and outstanding autonomy. Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G 6.9″ 512GB The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Apple Watch Series 11 smartwatch He Apple Watch Series 11 It is one of those reference smart watches for those looking for exhaustive control of their health, sports and daily connectivity without leaving the Apple ecosystem. It is now reduced to 349 euros on Amazon. It stands out for its even more stylized design, with a Always-On display Brighter and more efficient, ideal for checking notifications and outdoor workouts at a quick glance. Thanks to its advanced sensors, it offers accurate health readings, fall detection and optimized sleep tracking. Apple Watch Series 11 GPS with 42mm Space Gray Aluminum Case and Black Sport Band The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Pack of two Tapo P110 smart plugs If you haven’t gone on vacation yet and want to pretend that you are at home when you are at your vacation destination, smart plugs are a good option to turn lamps on and off remotely, for example. This pack of two Tapo P110 (one of the best-selling models) costs now 17.99 euros on Amazon. They are compatible with Google Assistant and Alexa and, in addition, they offer energy monitoring. Tapo P110 (2 Packs) – Mini Wi-Fi Smart Plug (with Energy Monitoring) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Hisense HS2100 sound bar If you want to improve the audio on your TV without spending a lot of money, this Hisense sound bar is the best seller at the moment and has a discount of more than 40% (it is available for 88.09 euros). Offers a 240W power and is compatible with Dolby Audio and DTS Virtual:X and has Bluetooth 5.3 connectivity and HDMI ARC. Hisense HS2100 – Sound Bar 2.1, 240W The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Javier Lacort and Álex Alcolea (Xataka), Hisense, Xiaomi, Huawei, Tapo and Apple In Xataka | Best Amazon Fire TV. Which one to buy and recommended models to convert your TV into a smart TV depending on use In Xataka | Best televisions in quality price. Which one to buy and seven recommended 4K smart TVs

I have tried a high-end stroller that rocks on its own. And how expensive stops seeming so when you look at its competition

From the creators of “I have pricked a glucometer without being diabetic” either “I have gone out into the street with an exoskeleton“, everything is for workcomes now “I have had a daughter to be able to go one step further with this type of articles.” It may not have been exactly like that, but the truth is that I have been pushing the Cybex e-Gazelle S, an electric baby stroller, for eight weeks. It rocks itself and helps you on slopes. I have been carrying it since my daughter was born and always in individual mode: I have not mounted the second seat or the tandem carrycot that this model promotes, only the Gazelle S Cot carrycot that came in the pack. I say this because there is reviews out there they value their behavior in double, with two children and purchases on top, and I can’t talk about that. I’m talking about what I’ve experienced: a stroller for a newborn in Valencia, without impossible hills or epic due to a double upbringing (parents of twins, you have my full appreciation). And yet it has given me much more to think about than I expected. Because the e-Gazelle S is, above all, a good stroller. And only later, one that rocks alone. First the car, then the engine It’s easy for the word “electric” to take over the rest of the spec sheet, and I think that would be a mistake. The e-Gazelle S is large, comfortable and built with a solidity that is noticeable in the hand: aluminum chassis, wheels that absorb potholes and poorly graded sidewalks well, huge lower basket plus a removable shopping basket that I plan to use as soon as my xiqueta can go to the stroller. The chassis with the chair (not the carrycot) weighs 14.7 kilos, almost two more than the “normal” e-Gazelle (12.9 kg), somewhat heavy when it comes time to put it in the trunk of the car, figures very similar to those of the most similar stroller in the competition, the Bugaboo Donkey, which I will talk more about later to compare them. Folding and unfolding is quite simple once you remember everything to touch at once. Image: Xataka. Overall maneuverability is good. It turns easily, is controlled with one hand when the other is needed for whatever, and the carrycot, with its XXL hood, is one of the most successful I have tried. My daughter is comfortable in there, and that, at eight weeks old, is the only thing that really matters to me. Although in reality I also care about my comfort wearing it: I’m 1.90m tall and not all of the strollers I tried a few months ago seemed designed for my height. Some made my lower back work and made me walk with a bump. It might be harmless for two minutes, but it would certainly be hellish for a long walk. This car has an adjustable handlebar that when fully deployed reaches 1.10 m in height, at the top of the models I reviewed. Comfortable, great, it lets me walk straight. Image: Xataka. But there is a ‘but’ that I think is not usually mentioned: The rear wheels, the large ones, protrude beyond the width of the chassis, as can be seen in the image above this paragraph. In large spaces nothing is noticeable. The problem appears in the tight maneuvers of everyday domestic life: a turn between the sofa and the living room furniture, leaving or entering the elevator, avoiding a door jamb, etc. There, more than once, especially in the first few days, I have accidentally hit something with that wheel that sticks out a little more than the eye calculates. It’s not serious—nothing has happened—but it’s the type of daily use friction that I haven’t seen mentioned and that can only be discovered by living with the stroller, not by trying it for a while in the store. I think that’s my only real ‘but’ to this stroller. The rocking chair, put to the test This is where the e-Gazelle S differs from any other stroller I’ve tried. You lock the front wheels, brake the rear, turn on the engine, hold down the rocking button until you choose the intensity (there are three) and the stroller It begins to swing on its own, back and forth, like your own hand would do on the street holding the handlebars.. With less grace, yes. One nuance: at first you turn it on accidentally from time to time. Holding the handlebar in one hand to maneuver without looking at it too much makes it easy to end up accidentally touching the button. Although nothing happens, you get used to avoiding pressing that area. But when the stroller falls into the hands of a family member who wants to take it, again it is easy for them to hit it and you will find it turned on. It’s a minor issue, but it doesn’t hurt to mention it. From those two buttons on the handlebar you control its electrical part. Image: Xataka. The first few weeks my daughter didn’t quite give in to the invention. He found it difficult, he preferred human movement in general and holding her in his arms in particular. But in recent times she has changed her mind, and there is one afternoon that I remember well: I was especially upset on the terrace of a cafeteria, for no apparent reason, and I tried the rocking chair almost without faith. He calmed down and stayed that way for a long time, much longer than I expected. In fact, I had the idea (untested, just intuition) that the battery would last about 20 minutes of use. It stayed active much longer than that. lThe autonomy reaches just over a continuous hour depending on the rocking level. Rocking at its lowest intensity. Image: Xataka. And the rocking at its greatest intensity. Image: Xataka. I cannot speak with the same reliability about the … Read more

Xiaomi has a full-time humanoid robot in its car factory. You’re ready to stop being an intern

Xiaomi has made its car factory cause a sensation. With the SU7 and YU7 in the market, the company has managed to make people stand in line and pay a fortune to see how these cars are manufactured, something they have achieved thanks to a good marketing strategy and, above all, a futuristic factory with a hook that is difficult to ignore: humanoid robots riding the cars. It was this past March when we learned from Lei Jun, founder and CEO of the company, that they had put a series of humanoid robots to work. “do internships” inside the factories. The tasks of these robots were not at all exciting, as they were dedicated to one thing: putting self-tapping nuts on the floor parts of cars. However, the period of being robo-interns is coming to an end and it has been the CEO himself who has commented that robots have climbed several steps. Specifically, they are almost on the same level of success as their human “companions.” From robo-interns to robo-experts The task they had to do is the most alienating and example of chain work that you can imagine. The system collects the nuts from an automatic supply equipment and deposits them in the indicated place, where the automatic screwing is subsequently carried out. Indeed: the robots were putting nuts… and that’s it. In March, Lei Jun said the robots had achieved a 90.2% success rate in placing nuts during three hours of continuous autonomous operation. This figure indicates the number of correct operations compared to the total attempts made and, in addition, they detailed that they adjusted to a production cycle of 76 seconds. Timing in these factories is crucial, especially when all steps are so automated if the car output goals are to be achieved. Now, although putting on nuts seems simple, they are not like those on an Ikea piece of furniture and there are some things to consider. A key challenge in this process is getting the self-tapping nut to precisely align, center and seat on the locating pin before screwing. Otherwise, the system crashes and the join is incomplete. And this process is complicated by three main factors: Grip variability: The orientation of the nut on the robot gripper changes with each cycle. Design and physical forces– The internal knurling of the nut and the magnetic attraction of the pin make exact adjustment difficult. Operating environment: There are limitations on the working angle and external interference in the assembly area. For the robot it is more complicated than it seems, but now it has been Lei Jun himself who has turned to come to the fore to point out that robots have gone from that success rate of 90.2% to 98%. They are, according to the executive, just one percentage point behind human workers. And most importantly, they are ready to take on more complex tasks. Because thanks to that success, it has been decided that Robots can begin to tackle more complex tasks. Because from tightening nuts, they have moved on to new stations that included tasks such as installing the side panels of the center console, as well as folding and recycling parts. The side panel task is complex because it is a large, flexible, irregularly shaped component that requires multiple pick-and-place cycles in different positions. Xiaomi says this is the first time a humanoid robot has completed prolonged manipulation of such a part on a real automotive production line and estimates the success rate to be over 90%. In four months we will see where that percentage is, but although it is clear that the evolution of the company’s humanoid tobots It is being remarkable, we are talking about robots that are still in the testing phase and in a single workstation. They are taking data and running every possible metric to determine if they are up to par for a productive, full-scale deployment. Human workers can rest easy, at least for a few more months. What I don’t understand is why they have to look like robots taken from the reboot from ‘Robocop’. In Xataka | In the war of humanoid robots, those from the United States dance and those from China work by the piece. It is not a technological issue

how a probe launched in 2006 woke up and warned Madrid from 9.5 billion km

About 9.5 billion kilometers from Earth, a ship built by humans more than two decades ago continued to advance through a region of the Solar System that we barely know. He had left in January 2006had left Pluto behind and had been in hibernation for 321 days, almost silently, while its trajectory took it further and further away from us. So after almost a year, New Horizons sent the signal confirming his awakening. It did not bring spectacular images nor did it announce a great discovery: it simply told us that it had come out of its dream and was still in good condition. That signal did not respond to an order sent from Earth that same morning. Before going into hibernation, the team had uploaded a sequence of instructions to the main computer that told the probe when to wake up its systems. New Horizons executed that programming on June 23 and came out of hibernation without needing a new order from our planet. Only then did he send his message to us. When the Deep Space Network station near Madrid received itabout eight hours and 52 minutes had passed since waking up. From this station near Madrid confirmation was received that New Horizons had woken up and was still in good condition. Hibernating didn’t mean turning off the ship and hoping it would come back on months later. During that period, a good part of its systems remained disconnected to reduce consumption and wear, but the flight computer continued to monitor the general condition while the vehicle rotated stably on itself. Once a week, in addition, it sent a simple beacon to indicate if everything was still in order. This way, the team could know that New Horizons was still healthy without maintaining constant communication or unnecessarily occupying the ground antennas. The system that remained in control was not like the computers we carry in our pockets. The command and data management system is supported by a 12MHz Mongoose V processorprotected against radiation and designed to resist rather than run. This component distributes orders among the subsystems and executes routines that allow the probe to react without immediate intervention. Upon certain failures, the ship can initiate a recovery, switch to backup components, or send a request for help. At that distance, autonomy is not an added function, but a condition for survival. The probe also could not send each measurement at the time it was obtained. His observations were stored in two 8 GB solid state drivesa main one and a backup one, while the computer organized and compressed them for later transmission. Seen from our current devices, that memory is almost insignificant; in deep space, forces you to manage each data carefully. The team had to prioritize and wait until the vehicle could point correctly toward our planet. Discovering something was only the first part: we still had to get it to us. A space probe designed to last The next problem was keeping alive a machine that was traveling further and further away from the source of energy that illuminates our planet. New Horizons does not rely on solar panels, but rather a radioisotope thermoelectric generator that uses the heat released by the decay of plutonium-238 to produce electricity. The power it delivers slowly decreases over the years, so each instrument turned on implies a decision. On the other hand, the insulating layers retain the heat generated by the electronics themselves, while automatic heaters intervene when this protection is not enough. After visiting Pluto and Arrokoth, New Horizons continues to move outwards from the Solar System Finding us from the far reaches of the Solar System requires much more than turning on a transmitter. The spacecraft observes the stars and compares what it sees with a catalog stored on board to determine where it is facing. Its small thrusters then make the necessary adjustments to align the main antenna with the Earth. That antenna cannot move independentlyso the entire vehicle must be placed in the correct direction before starting unloading. Only then can the stored data begin a nearly nine-hour journey to us. The paradox of that hibernation was that New Horizons was still doing science. Although the controllers were not sending commands or downloading information, three instruments remained active to study the particles, plasma and dust surrounding the probe. SWAP, PEPSSI and accountant Venetia Burney continued to take measurements and retain them for when regular communication could resume. The mission had reduced much of its activity, but not its ability to observe: even during the longest sleep in its history, outer space continued to pass through its sensors. A ship launched two decades ago does not age like one of our devices: no one can bring it back, change a part, or connect it to a more powerful energy source. What the team can do is teach you how to better manage what you still have. Before its final sleep, New Horizons received a crash protection update to address the gradual drop in power and increased communication delays. Her awakening was not, therefore, an isolated trick, but the result of twenty years of learning to keep her alive from a distance. Images | NASA | In Xataka | NASA is looking for four people who want to live a year on Mars without leaving Earth

2,000 years ago someone screwed up in a foundry. Thanks to her we have discovered a Roman workshop hidden in Germany

When a piece of metal goes wrong, the normal thing in an artisan workshop is that it ends up being discarded. Well, something like this must have happened 2,000 years ago and that chance discovery of a lead ingot at an excavation in Rothaargebirgein the German region of Sauerland, has helped discover, understand and reconstruct how this metal was produced in the Roman Empire. The discovery. It all started with a large cast lead ingot, with a characteristic workmanship from the Roman imperial period, which found Brilon resident and metal prospector Peter Hoffman. Then he notified the authorities: the ingot was not a unit lost in transit, but a casting failure that was probably left there with the idea of ​​remelting it to use it, something that fortunately (for archaeology) never happened. With that clue, the archeology team of the Westphalia-Lippe Regional Association (LWL) The excavation campaign began in June on an elevation of the Rothaargebirge massif, near Brilon. What they found there confirmed his suspicions: There was a lead processing area from Roman times, something unique until now in southwest Westphalia. Why is it important. It may not be as spectacular as tombs or treasures, but this defective lead ingot serves to fill a gap in history: it is the first solid archaeological evidence that a metallurgical production chain existed in Sauerland, something that until now was not known. This is how he fills in a piece to better explain how the Roman economy worked. Furthermore, since ingots are direct products of mining and are marked with seals or engravings, they allow their distribution chain to be traced: the place of origin (the manufacturing workshop is close to the mine), their trade and distribution networks. In fact, there is a corpus which brings together some 2,250 Roman ingots documented from Scotland to Morocco and from Portugal to Israel. Context. As explains the Deutsches Bergbau-Museum Bochumlead was a metal widely used in Roman times for all kinds of things: pipes, weights, sling projectiles or sarcophagus linings… and sometimes it was linked to the extraction of silver, so it is common to find the production of both together. Precisely this relationship between lead and silver is essential to explain Brilon. According to the doctor in archeology of the LWL Manuel Zeilerrelatively small amounts of lead were found at the site, which suggests that the objective was to produce lead efficiently and not generate waste derived from silver exploitation, an important detail because in many ancient sites both activities go hand in hand. Previous works by LWL already indicated that in the area around Brilon there were deposits rich in mineral and that Roman metallurgists had visited the area with the interest of obtaining lead, but it was not clear how. In detail. The team, led by Sebastian Magnus Sonntag, documented that there were ceramic fragments of pre-Roman tradition and numerous small fragments of lead related to the process of obtaining the metal, in addition to a base built with carefully arranged stone slabs. Both these slabs and the clay soil beneath showed signs of fire and heat and in the gaps between stones there were remains of charcoal, still to be analyzed, but the team’s hypothesis points because that place was a roasting point: there the galena (the most common lead sulfide in the region) was heated along with charcoal to reduce its sulfur content and then melt the resulting metal and pour it into molds and obtain ingots like the one found. Yes, but. The excavation only lasted a couple of weeks and the conclusions are still preliminary, but there are some things that still do not add up: the ceramic fragments probably point to the beginning of the Roman imperial era, but it is a relative and not an absolute dating. The key will be in the dating of the vegetal carbon remains. But the big underlying question was who worked the metal there: whether they were Romans, Germans or local artisans in contact with Roman technology. In Xataka | “For 2,000 years they have been inaccessible. Finally we can read them”: archaeologists now know how to decipher the Herculaneum papyri In Xataka | The “Mud Rome” of Hispania loved board games and wine. We know it thanks to a mysterious site in Aragon Cover | LWL and Jebulon

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.