Model

The AI ​​race seemed to be matching. Openai has just hit the table with a model that points very high

by

The career for artificial intelligence had been narrowing for months. Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude 4 Opus and Deepseek R1 they had managed to cut distances with OpenAi models, presenting increasingly sophisticated reasoning. The overwhelming domain of 2022, when Chatgpt He left the competition bewildered and several steps behind, no longer defines the current board. Today, the fight is direct. But the firm led by Sam Altman It has not been still. It has just announced O3-Proa new reasoning model with which, at least on paper, it intends to reaffirm its leadership position in the industry. It is available from today only for some plans, excluding Chatgpt plus of 20 dollars a month. Access to the most advanced AI has a price. More tools and more context. The O3-Pro model part of the same base as O3but with an additional stage of reinforcement training and more inference resources. It incorporates full access to the tools that have made chatgpt a more useful tool: web search, file analysis, images about Python and customization through memory. These are functions that allow you to adapt the responses to the user’s history, access external sources in real time and solve complex tasks in several steps. Has: Search, code, document analysis and vision Customization based on active memory Context window of up to 200,000 tokens and maximum output of 100,000 More precise, but not faster. Of course, O3-Pro is not a model designed for speed. The answers usually take more than in O1-Pro, but in return promises to offer a plus in precision focused on complex tasks. Openai recommends using it when reliability is more important than speed. So we could say that it is a model designed for those who need things to go well, even if that implies waiting for a few more seconds. In any case, we are talking about AI models, so hallucinations can still exist and can give us erroneous information. Theoretically superior performance. According to internal OpenAI tests, human evaluators prefer O3-Pro against O3 in all tested categories: science, education, programming, personal writing and data analysis. It also achieves better results in academic Benchmarks: in competitive mathematics it rises from 86 % of 93 % O1-PRO, and in programming exceeds 2,700 EL points, compared to the 2,517 of O3 and the 1,707 of O1-Pro. Available now, but not for everyone. O3-PRO is now available for users of the PRO PLAN (200 dollars a month) and the Team Plan, where it replaces O1-Pro in the model selector. OpenAI has confirmed that Enterprise users and educational accounts will have access from next week. At the moment, access to the most powerful models is still restricted to those who pay for the most advanced modalities. The Plus Plan of 20 dollars per month, the most popular among private users, is not mentioned. And everything indicates that, for now, it will be out of this update. Images | OpenAI In Xataka | Someone put Chatgpt, Gemini, Claude and others to play a kind of Risk. The results could not be more disparate

Ukraine has found the solution to produce three times more weapons than you can buy: the Danish model

by

It was known that Ukraine had raised a drone industry in front of the Lack of help. What was no longer known was that, since Russia launched its large -scale invasion in 2022, the Ukrainian defense industry had experienced a Explosive growthmultiplying its productive capacity by 35, from 1,000 million to 35,000 million dollars in annual potential. The problem was that, that the “potential” had no exit due to lack of financing. Until now. Lack of funds. As we said, this immense development Not only has it covered large companies, but also small workshops that operate even from particular garages, adapting to the needs of the battlefield. However, and despite this growing capacity, the country is limited by the Lack of financing: The state budget only allows to hire about 11,500 million in weapons, which leaves more than two thirds of the idle industrial potential. In fact, companies in the sector and senior officials They coincide in Insider in which, if there were the necessary funds, Ukraine could triple your production Armamentistic, thus reinforcing its resistance and reducing its dependence on foreign suppliers. Now they think they have found the solution in Denmark. The Danish model. To solve this paradox, the Ukrainian industry has proposed a small -scale solution: the call “Danish model”. This formula, applied by Denmark since 2023, allows allied countries Buy directly Weapons produced in Ukraine, instead of sending them from their own arsenals or acquiring them to Western suppliers. This way not only Reduce costs and accelerates the delivery of material, but also guarantees that the soldiers receive exactly What they needmanufactured according to its tactical demands and with an optimized logistics. Several countries have already added to this approachand others, like Germany, work in own adaptations. Thanks to this formula, Ukraine has been able to increase the production of key systems such as Bohdana self -propelled obúsand already has a list of weapons (including artillery and armored vehicles) ready to manufacture if more funds are channeled under the scheme. Collaboration and alternatives. Although the Danish model represents the road faster and fasterIt is not the only one. Serhiy Goncharov, president of the National Association of Defense Industries of Ukraine, and other leaders of the sector have also raised more complex models, based on co -production and the co -production and the Financing of Ukrainian weapons which include European components. This formula, although slower, could be attractive to a European industry that is also expanding its capacity Before the fear of A Russian expansion In the continent. In addition, the use of frozen Russian assets as a source of financing and the establishment of industrial alliances for technological transfers is considered. So much, Goncharov warns That many Western partners still do not expand their defensive capacity with the urgency that the situation requires, and that Ukraine, therefore, has no choice but to continue growing on its own to meet their own needs. Strategic opportunity Collaboration with Ukraine not only represents a way of supporting his defense in the short term, but a strategic opportunity For allied countries. The Ukrainian arms industry, born and adapted in the midst of the conflict, accumulates a direct experience in combat that is invaluable for any military power. Let’s think that your constant contact with the front allows you to adjust the design and performance of weapons based on the real conditions of the battlefield, something that many Western industries cannot replicate with the same speed. In that sense, associating with Ukraine offers Europe and other regions a double advantage: strengthening an essential supply line for Kyiv and learning from a military ecosystem that has proven extraordinarily Resilient, innovative and effective under pressure. As Goncharov concludes“We do not choose to be at war, but that is our reality,” and within it, the production capacity is ready. Image | Ministry of Defense In Xataka | We suspected that Ukraine drones attack had been destructive. Space images have revealed how much In Xataka | A technology 20 years ago took Ukraine to the Russian bombers. Moscow’s response comes from China: a laser cannon

The restoration of old photos has always been a challenge. This new AI model has just resolved it

by

The ability of AI to generate texts, images or video have proven to be amazing, but there was still a problem that These systems were resisted: the one Restore old photos to leave them perfect. That has just changed with Flux.1 Kontexta family of generative AI models with a very special characteristic: instead of following the line of the traditional text-imagen models, Flux.1 Kontext generates in-conntext images: it is possible to use as prompt a reference image and a text (prompt) so that the combination is much more powerful. You don’t need to look at the camera. The AI ​​is able to generate an image of yours looking from the original (on the left) and even a smiling. Source: Black Forest Labs. The possibilities, as explained by Black Forest Labs – the startup that develops these models – are spectacular. It is possible to maintain the context – paids, faces, objects – to modify the rest of the image at our whim: it is enough to combine those reference images with more or less detailed prompts to obtain the desired result. What Black Forest Labs engineers did not say is that this same idea could be applied to an old need: the aforementioned Old photos restoration. It is enough to load any image damaged by the passage of time or for any other reason, and Flux will do a spectacular restoration work in just a few moments. An old woman (I will not say how much) mine: if I see her from afar the result is spectacular, credible. When I do zoom, somewhat more weird things begin to appear: the face somewhat more elongated, more “square”, the nose and forehead. It’s me, but it’s not me. It is possible to test the tool in the “Recreo Patio” (Playground) of Black Forestor in services such as Fal.AI. We wanted to try it in Freepik, the Spanish generative the AI ​​platform that from the first moment has given access to previous Black Forest Labs models and of course already available Flux.1 Kontext in their two modalities, Pro and Max. Real Madrid. Commonwealth Regional Championship, October 28, 1934. Source: Institute of Cultural Heritage of Spain The results have really been striking, as can be seen in That old photo of the Real Madrid of 1934. The image headed by the article is a clear example, and here there are some details that are common in this generative model. Thus, it is possible to turn old photos into current photos that also have color and much more detail than the originals. It may even in portraits the result is similar but strange, artificial, or that traits of the person who make the result are somewhat shocking are modified. It happened for example with a Lincoln portrait obtained of the US Congress bookstore. Of course, that can end up being counterproductive. We have used a very simple prompt for this process: “Restore and Colorize This Image. Remove Any Scratches or Imperfections, Keep Fidelity”, but it is possible to adjust the results more if we introduce much more specific requests and prompts. Of course, miracles do not exist and if we zoom in the images, the problem of “hallucinations” applied to the generative image of images can arise. In the famous photograph of ‘Lunch atop a Skyscraper’ (Wikipedia) The detail of the original is scarce, so when AI tries to restore it, invents small details or features that are not. The result seen from afar, yes, is fantastic. Although Flux.1 Kontext fails to improve the definition of the image too much, sacrifices that level of detail to maintain loyalty, color and fix all the cracks of the original photo. Source: Reddit. The examples speak for themselves and demonstrate that the restoration of photos reaches thanks to this model a really spectacular quality, as happens in the photo of that family (Reddit). To get an idea of ​​the cost, each image restored with Flux Pro in Freepick costs 100 credits, and with a monthly subscription at its premium service (10 euros/month) 18,000 credits are achieved. Thus, 180 of these restorations for 10 euros, less than six cents per image. Other Black Forest Labs models are available in Github And they can be installed and used at home – ideal if you have a good GPU – but for now Flux.1 Kontext is not included in that catalog. We do not know if they will add it soon, but for the moment it is possible to experience for free with the model in services such as those mentioned. Without a doubt, a great option to perform this type of task. In Xataka | The 1900 Paris, in 4K all color: the restored videos that transport you to the 19th century

There is a career to achieve the cheapest and most powerful model. And against all prognosis, China is winning it

by

On May 20 Google launched Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Flash in preliminary version. These new AI models were better than ever, and to demonstrate the company included in its announcement several graphs and comparative tables. They looked at how both surpassed their rivals both in the field of reasoning and in the traditional performance (Benchmarks of Mathematics or Programming), but there was also another fact that Google presumed: Google: The cost of Gemini 2.5 Flash. Source: Google. That table published by Google made it clear that Gemini 2.5 Flash It was clearly the winner of that comparison in the important price/benefits ratio. What Google did not say is that this success of this model was the exception to the rule, because in that race for having cheap and powerful models, China seems to take the lead. He does it at least if we attend to the cost of using these models. In Xataka we have analyzed that cost based not on the price of subscriptions for end users, but on the cost of access to the API, which is the one that allows developers to integrate these models into their own chatbots and their services. The API prices of each model clearly differentiate two uses from artificial intelligence. On the one hand, how much does it cost to write something for the model to then process it (the so -called input tokens). On the other, how much does the text generated by the model once processed the answer (the so -called output tokens). The entrance tokens They are usually five times cheaper than exitbecause processing the request and generating text is much more expensive than receiving it, analyzing and “understanding it.” We wanted to compare the cost of the main models of the AI ​​developed in China and those of the US, and although as always are not all that are, if they are all. The resulting table is as follows: These prices are public and very easy to find in the case of US AI models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) but not so much in the case of Chinese models (Deepseek, Qwen (Alibaba), Doubao (Bytedance), GLM-4 (Zhipu), Ernie (Baidu)). Be that as it may, the table, ordered from the cheapest to the most expensive, demonstrates that today Chinese models are especially cheap. Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview manages to compete – and does it exceptionally. In the rest of the cases, the AI ​​models in China win the battle for cost. It must be noted that, Like all comparisons, this is unfair. And it is because that table does not take into account the benefits of each model. Openai O3 and Anthropic Claude Opus 4, the last and most powerful models of those companies, are especially precise in their answers, but each consultation consumes much more resources (computation, energy) and that makes it logical that they are much more expensive than their competitors. But these models are also designed for very special cases and for specialized, detailed and deep consultations. In the vast majority of cases it is not necessary to use these models, and that is where they are competing for example Deepseek R1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: in the price/benefits ratio. Models with variable prices That price battle has made us see in recent times two techniques that some companies are applying to the prices of use of their APIs. The first one is to differentiate normal entries and outputs of inputs (and even exits) cache. Deepseek API prices. Attentive to the lower left: according to the time you use them, they can leave cheaper. Source: Deepseek. The explanation is simple: a “normal” entry is a request or question that the model has never processed and therefore has to process completely. If the entrance has been caught (Cache hit) is because that request has been processed in the past, so the system can obtain the response of its cache, which significantly reduces the computational costs. Deepseek, Google, Anthropic and Openai offer this type of option, as can be seen in the table. The second technique is to use variable prices according to (at the moment) the time slot in which we use these models. This is what Deepseek has done, which has “day” and “night” prices according to UTC schedule. If you use the Depseek API from 18:30 to 2:30 (Peninsular schedule in Spain), it will be half price. Good news: AI is every time (much) cheaper While China and the US fight who has the most powerful model or who has the cheapest model, what is constantly happening is that the AI ​​price is falling remarkably. It is an observation that several experts such as Ethan Mollick, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania who recently analyzed how That price/benefits ratio does nothing but improve. The models are getting better and cheaper. Other experts such as Raveesh Bhalla – explained by Netflix and LinkedIn – also reflected this evolution at the beginning of the year. Then he showed how the cost of an O1 level model had dropped 27 times in the last three months. Moreover, at this rhythm the GPT4 level models – which a year ago were absolute referents – will be reduced 1,000 times in just 18 months. We are living it in price reduction. Dane Bahey, from Openai, said at a conference in September last year how the cost per million tokens had fallen from 36 dollars At just 0.25 dollars In the last 18 months. And that price drop is still clear and fantastic for users. Thus, we are facing a career that at the moment has a lot of stretch: China’s models carry the lead if we attend only to their cost, but careful, because we must also take into account the benefits. It is true that these Chinese models have already shown in the benchmarks that have been showing that they compete from you to you with the best US models, and now it remains to … Read more

A complete range in which a 98 “model with a groundbreaking price stands out

by

Haier is no newcomer. This Chinese company landed in the Spanish market more than two decades ago and we followed the track very closely For almost twenty years. During this time we have had the opportunity to thoroughly analyze several of its televisions, such as the model HQLED S800which, despite being a mid -range TV, left me a good taste for its ability to perform well in any use scenario. Anyway, this manufacturer’s commitment for 2025 is more ambitious than The one of previous years. Although it has presented a range consisting of nine series in this article we will investigate in the six families that seem more interesting to us for their price/benefits ratio. There goes a small advance: there is everything from an OLED model to the last to several very interesting mini-read televisions, through a 98-inch giganton with an approachable price. C95: The flagship model proposes an OLED panel up to 144 Hz Haier C95. On paper, the specifications of this television are at the height of which the models equipped with a more advanced organic panel of the competition propose. Your OLED matrix works a maximum soda frequency of 144 Hz and live with an image processor capable of dealing so much with DOLBY VISION IQ CONTENTS such as HDR10+, HDR10 and HLG. Nothing to object to here. The heart of this C95, beyond its organic panel, is a socote with four nuclei that works side by side with a main memory map of 3 GB. On the other hand, Haier has resolved the sound of this TV betting on a 2.1 channel configuration and the ability to decode audio Dolby Atmos. Soon it will reach Spanish stores with a price of 1,999 euros for the 55 -inch model and 2,799 euros for the 65 -inch version. M96, M95, M90 and M80 Series: Total Bet for Mini-Led technology Haier M96. The M96 model is the LCD TV with the most ambitious mini-read retroilumination of Haier. Your panel can work at a maximum soda frequency of 144 Hz with videogames and incorporates a SOC that works in Tandem with 4 GB of main memory. The 100 -inch version proposes us 5.2.1 Sound channelswhile those of 75 and 85 inches have a slightly more modest audio hardware (2.1.2 channels). Haier M95. Just below the M96 model in the Porfolio de Haier resides the very interesting M95. Its Mini-LED backlit matrix is ​​capable of delivering a maximum brightness of 2,000 Nits according to this manufacturer, and, as in the M96, the panel refreshes a maximum of 144 Hz with video games. Its four -core socates coexists with 3 GB of main memory and is able to process Dolby Atmos sound. The 65 -inch version costs 1,999 euros, while the 75 -inch price has a price of 2,599 euros. The M90 ​​series, on the other hand, is committed to an LCD panel and MEMC type image for, as well as the other models we have reviewed, give ourselves a maximum soda of 144 Hz. With regard to the HDR contents it is compatible with all the formats currently used: Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10+, HDR10 and HLG. And a hardware of 2.1 channels is in charge of the sound. The 55 -inch model costs 1,099 euros, while 65 inches is priced at 1,499 euros. Haier M80. The most affordable mini-read retroilumination series that Haier is currently in catalog is the M80. However, although its price is lower than that of the other families, it does not sacrifice the ability to process all the HDR formats currently available or the Dolby Atmos audio reproduction through its 2.1 channel hardware. It also implements VRR and Allm technologies linked to the standard HDMI 2.1so, on paper, it is an adequate television for video games. This series is available in 55, 65, 75 and 85 inches with a starting price of 899 euros. S90: 98 inches at a very competitive price Haier S90. The S90 model is one of the gigantones of the Haier catalog. He proposes an LCD panel with nanocrystalsa 120 Hz soda and FALD type backhoration (Full Array Local Dimming), so its ability to control light is not as precise as that of the mini-led models in which we have just inquired. Even so, on paper it is an interesting TV. And it is because it costs 3,299 euros, an attractive price if we are in mind that it is a television of no less than 98 inches. In Xataka | China is devouring the televisions market. So much that Panasonic considers abandoning it In Xataka | The television market has been dominated for years by Korea and Japan. Now they have a new rival: China

The owner of a Tesla Model and set out to come to Everest with his electric car. And he had a great idea called gasoline

by

There is an obvious reason that continues to wear the sale of electric cars in Spain: the alleged lack of loaders. In Xataka We have already tried that it is not so much a lack of loaders as a evident invisibility of them and one lack of trust in your reliabilitywhich causes doubts that they have thought or might think of making the leap. On our trip From Berlin to Madrid aboard a Tesla Model 3 We verify that Europe is very nourished by chargers of all kinds, from rapids that allow recharging while you eat to the slow ones to use while you make night, passing through the ultra -graphs that on the service roads put the car in tune in a few minutes. But, as much as we want, we talk about Europe and not all places have the same facilities. You just have to look at the United States where recharge network It is much more scarce and unreliable than in our continent, which is delaying the adoption of technology. So, can we travel anywhere in the world with an electric car? Could we match the trip that this influencer is making for Carry your Fiat Marea to Japan from Spain? Could we, for example, go to Everest by electric car? Common sense tells us no. But it’s just that, common sense. A tesla, a generator and the roof of the world Common sense, beyond the manida phrase that it is the least common of the senses, is also fluctuating. What for some may seem an impossible mission, for others, simply, it is as easy as taking appropriate measures and adapting to each situation. That is why the owner of a Tesla Moder and did not see any problem in taking his car and putting Rumbo to Everest. If on the road I could find the electricity assortment, it was the least, it would manufacture it. As? Obviously, with an electric generator moved by gasoline. The story is told in Carnewschina where it is explained that the owner of the electric car created its own version of “extended autonomy.” To do this, he installed an 8 kW gasoline generator at the rear of the car. With him underway, he could fill the Tesla Model battery and a power similar to that of a domestic plug, specifically 3 kW. In the middle they point out that at that rate The Tesla recovered 19 kilometers Of autonomy every hour and that, full of the tank, the cargo of the car could be sustained for nine and a half hours. That is, at full capacity the generator could deliver about 180 kilometers of autonomy to the car during, for example, a plugged night. Only in this way has Lhatse County, Tibet region very close to Everest that is already 5,300 meters high. The adventure and its result can be seen in this video where the car owner tells his experience and shows how the system works. Although it is understood why this can be called Tesla Model and a “extended range” car or “extended autonomy”, we must bear in mind that it does not work as a vehicle that implements this technology to use. Simply use the electricity generator as a mobile plug that has to be fed by a fossil fuel. An extended rank electric car is one that is mostly used as an electric and takes advantage of gasoline in a very punctual way. This works, for example, a Mazda MX-30. In this case, it is the car itself that functions as an electricity generating station. The gasoline engine generates electricity that is sent to the battery and nourishes the electric motors that are the ones that move the car. When operating in a concrete regime of revolutions per minute, the gasoline engine always works in its most efficient range and, such as electric motors that move the wheels, although the combustion engine is in operation the touch of the car is still very similar to that of an electric. These types of cars are widely used in China because extended rank electric are considered New energy vehicles (NEV) and are classified at the same level as electric cars even though, in the background, it is plug -in hybrids and can emit CO2 and any other contaminating particle typical of a gasoline engine. In Spain, these cars also have zero dgt emissions sticker as electric since their autonomy is greater than 45 kilometers. But, in addition, they can receive the same aids as MOVES III PLAN that an electric car as long as they exceed 90 km of completely electric autonomy. Photo | @xiamo In Xataka | We have traveled 2,500 kilometers with an electric car and we have learned something: diesel is still the king

Claude Opus 4 launches and presents it as the best programming model in the world

by

After Google will display all its artillery in artificial intelligenceAnthropic did not want to be left behind. The company founded by Dario Amodei has moved tab strongly: has presented Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4two new models with which he aspires to leave his mark on the race for AI. The announcement star is Claude Opus 4, the most advanced model Anthropic has developed so far. And they do not walk with Rodeos: they assure that it is “the best programming model in the world. An ambitious statement that, as always, will have to be tested. But the first data places it very well positioned in front of its main rivals. In the benchmark Swe-Bench Verified, which evaluates real software engineering tasks, Opus 4 gets 72.5 % in standard conditions and reaches 79.4 % if the Parallel processing. It is a performance that leaves it above models such as GPT-4.1 (54.6 %), O3 (69.1 %) or the recent Gemini 2.5 Pro of Google (63.2 %). However, in other more demanding evidence in multimodal reasoning, such as GPQA Diamond or MMMU, focused on university level questions and complex scenarios that combine text and image, Opus 4 fails to overcome O3, which continues to lead in that field. A model with resistance and autonomy But beyond the numbers, what Anthropic wants to highlight is the resistance and autonomy of this model. Claude Opus 4 is capable of maintaining long work sessions and executing thousands of steps continuously. From the company they explain that this makes it an ideal basis for AI agents More sophisticated: systems that make decisions, complete tasks on their own and do not need constant human supervision. In parallel arrives Claude Sonnet 4, an evolution of the model that Anthropic launched in February. It is not intended to compete with Power Opus, but it offers a very balanced proposal between performance and efficiency. In coding it also makes an important leap with respect to its previous version: it goes from 62.3 % to 72.7 % in Swe-Bench Verified, and improves in reasoning tasks, instructions monitoring and general precision. Both models arrive with interesting news. For example, they can now alternate between reasoning and use of tools Within the same process, which allows more complete answers. They have also improved in reliability. According to Anthropic, they are 65 % less likely to take shortcuts or make serious mistakes than Sonnet 3.7. Claude Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 are already available in the API of Anthropic, at Amazon Bedrock and Google Cloud Vertex AI. They are included in the Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise plans. Prices are kept in the line of the previous models: Opus 4 costs $ 15 per million input tokens and 75 per million departure tokens. Sonnet 4 is more affordable: 3 and 15 dollars respectively. The latter can also be used from free accounts. Images | Anthropic In Xataka | We have tried the new Google AI mode: it is a direct bullet to the blue links that worries and excites in equal parts

This model that Openai presents as an improvement against GPT-4O would not reach Chatgpt. But now it’s here

by

When OpenAI presented GPT-4.1 Last April he said that the model would be available only through the API. In other words, that your access would be limited to professional users who develop applications. But this has just changed. GPT-4.1 land in chatgpt. The artificial intelligence startup (AI) Hannounced that “By popular request”, GPT-4.1 will be available in its chatbot application. This alternative has begun its deployment among the users of the Chatgpt Plus, Pro and Team payment plans. Those who use the Entertainment and Edu alternatives will have access “in the coming weeks.” And what about Free users. As we have just seen, GPT-4.1, at least for the moment, it will be limited to those who take out the wallet. But Openai is deploying among all, including the free ones, to GPT-4.1 Mini, a more leading version (and less capable). There are more changes. The positions in the model selector are changing. The firm led by Sam Altman has decided to eliminate GPT-4o Mini. The natural replacement is GPT-4.1 mini that we have just spoken. More capable than GPT-4o. At least according to what OpenAI says, GPT-4.1 is more capable than GPT-4O. If we take into account this, this means that the company is opening a new flaggpt model. Stands out in: Ability to follow instructions. In the Benchmark Multichallenge in Scale, a test that evaluates how well a model follows instructions, GPT-4.1 reaches 38.3%, with an improvement of 10.5 points compared to GPT-4O. Long context. In Video-Mme, a test focused on the understanding of long and multimodal contexts, GPT-4.1 marks a new maximum: 72.0% in the “Long without subtitles” category, surpassing GPT-4O in 6.7 points. PRogramation. GPT-4.1 achieves a 54.6% score in Swe-Bench Verified, improving at 21.4 points to GPT-4O and in 26.6 points to GPT-4.5. An alternative to O3. In the scope of programming, Openai says that GPT.4.1 can become an alternative to O3, its most advanced reasoning model available at this time. This is interesting because GPT.4.1 is not a reasoning model per se, but OpenAi seeks to combine the capacities of its standard models with the reasoning models in the future. Images | OpenAI + Photoshop | Levart_photographer In Xataka | OpenAi plans a future IPO. It is the definitive step to become a profit company

The Samsung Galaxy S25 EDGE is the latest high -end model of the firm and you can predominate it at the best price

by

Samsung has already presented the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edgea design focused on the design and that can already be pre -applied in several stores. If you plan to make the leap to this new high -end phone of the Korean firm, although its base price is 1,259 euroswe explain how to get it at the best price. Samsung Galaxy S25 EDGE 5G 6.7 “512GB Blue Titanium * Some price may have changed from the last review An outstanding mobile in design He Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge It is the finest mobile of the Galaxy family (with only 5.8 mm thick) and only weighs 163 grams. It stands out for its 6.7 -inch AMOLED LTPO screen with Quad HD+ resolution and its 120 Hz of refreshment. Monta the processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Eliteaccompanied by a 12 GB RAM. Its photographic system also stands out, since it is formed by a Double rear camera of 200+12 mp and works under the Android 15 operating system (based on one UI 7). Although it is true that, until now, everything is good characteristics, Its battery has generated controversy. It has a capacity of 3,900 mAh, something that users have not liked. Finally, as far as connectivity is concerned, it integrates 5g, Wifi 7Bluetooth 5.4, GPS, USB-C and NFC. Where to buy this mobile Samsung at the best price The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge It can already be pre -appored And there are two stores where we have found a way to get it at the best price. These are Mediamarkt and the Official Store of the company itself. Samsung’s official store If you decide to buy it in the official Samsung store, you can get this terminal With several discounts. So the phone would not come out for 1,259 euros but for 459 euros (applying the maximum discounts). This is the way of buying it. Service “Delivery and premiere”: You can get up to 700 euros discount delivering your old mobile. Payment with Bizum: You can get a discount of 100 euros. In addition, at the moment, if you pre -compose the terminal, you take Gemini Advanced and 2 TB of storage without cost for six months and if you acquire it From the appyou can get exclusive advantages. * Some price may have changed from the last review Mediamarkt The new Samsung terminal is also available with some discounts on Mediamarkt, being able to buy it for 1133.10 euros If you take into account the promotions that are in force. You can also 0% finance. 5% extra discount if you are a member of Mimediamarkt. 5% discount if you buy it through the Mediamarkt app. * Some price may have changed from the last review The best accessories for this mobile Natbok Clara found for Samsung Galaxy S25 EDGE 5G with 2 pieces screen protector * Some price may have changed from the last review Natbok Screen protector for Samsung Galaxy S25 EDGE 5G, 2+2 pieces * Some price may have changed from the last review Some of the links of this article are affiliated and can report a benefit to Xataka. In case of non -availability, offers may vary. Images | Samsung In Xataka | From 30 to 300 euros: Tell me what your budget is and I tell you what Bluetooth headphones you can buy In Xataka | Best Samsung mobiles: which buy and recommended models based on budget, tastes and quality price

Freepik has just launched an Open Source model with a groundbreaking characteristic: licensed images

by

The Spanish Startup Freepik is already one of the absolute referents in the segment of artificial intelligence, but its last launch is especially significant. It is a new model of its own generative called F lite which is a new blow to the table for several reasons, but especially for an especially striking. Licensed images. Freepik, in collaboration with Fal.AI, has presented F lite, a model of generative text in image that stands out especially for being trained “exclusively with high quality images, with legal support and copyright protected” thanks to an important detail. They come from the Freepik library. Inspired (partly) in Deepseek. In Xataka we have talked to Omar Pera (@ompemi), Product responsible in Freepik. He has explained to us how the Deepseek Chinese model served as inspiration by demonstrating that it was possible to create a small but very capable model with much less resources and data. F lite is trained with “only 80 million images, compared to more than one billion usual images” in models of the generative images of the competition. Open Source. As explained in the technical report that accompanies the launch, F Lite is also An Open Source model of 10 million parameters-diminuto if we compare it with the 1.76 trillion estimated GPT-4-which has been trained for two months in 64 GPUS NVIDIA H100. A sample of the result obtained with F lite via Fal.AI. The car does not resemble Renault 5, true, but at least at the level of photorealism the result is really decent. Small but solvent. As explained Iván de Prado (@ivanprado), one of the top people responsible for its development, F lite is a decent model to generate certain types of images despite its small size. It also has its limitations, and can show anatomical defects or not give good results in complex or text rendering. The model is available in two versions in Hugging Face (regular, Texture) and in Fal (regular, Texture). It is also possible Download the github and use it at home, for example via comfyui. Is just the beginning. The launch of this model raises the beginning of an especially striking project that could gradually make it an alternative that rival the most ambitious models, but always supported by that argument of being trained with licensed images and being Open Source. More options for users. The model is not part of the moment of the offer of models available on the Freepik web platform, yes, and does not compete directly with models such as FluxMystic or image 3. “The bet and strategy does not change,” Pear pointed out, and consists in “optimizing the user offer and offering the best technology to solve the problem” and the need of each user. Demands everywhere. We have been seeing how artificial intelligence companies make indiscriminate use of content protected by copyright to train their models. They usually do it without a license and without having permission to use those works, and that has caused numerous Copyright rape demands, especially in cases Like OpenAi. Freepik Enterprise. This announcement comes almost at the same time as its new business offer, called Freepik Enterprise. Omar Pera confirmed that the initial reception of F Lite has been remarkable since this new service. In this area it is precisely where using a model like this is especially interesting, because “companies are covered” when using a model trained with licensed images. A by adobe and other rivals. Pera also pointed us out in Freepik They do not compete With images, “we are going for professional use cases of marketing or design.” They are not compared to a Getty or a Shuttersock, and more “with the creative tools of Adobe, with Leonardo (part of Canva from a year ago) or with the professional services of Midjourney. “ Image | Freepik In Xataka | All the great AI have ignored the laws of Copyright. The amazing thing is that there is still no consequences

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.