Model

The best of the model is where it must always have been

by

GPT –4.1, GPT –4.5GPT-4.1-mini, O4-mini, O3, O3-PRO. If these names do not sound at all, you are not alone. Despite its popularity, a large part of the users of Chatgpt He never touched the model selector. Some knew that he was there, but beyond a brief description in the drop -down, few really understood what each one served. And yet they used it daily. Most likely, for months you have lived with the default base model –GPT -4Othe one Openai described as “ideal for most tasks” – without exploring anything else. Someone may ever try, just to discover that the results were not so different or that that was not what he was looking for. In the end, everything remained in the hands of a few advanced users, those who knew how to squeeze those other models to obtain better results. The model selector was a wall for many For a long time, using chatgpt meant making a decision that not everyone was prepared to take. What model choose? Which was better to program? And to write? What if I needed to analyze data? Openai offered a list, a brief and, hopeless description, some generic recommendation. But the only real way of understanding nuances was to experiment. Change model, try, compare results, change again. A process that demanded time and criteria. In an environment where we ask for immediate results, that was an invisible but real barrier. The majority stayed where he was. And the most curious thing is that even paying the subscription, many never used the options that were included. You don’t have to choose anymore. With the arrival of GPT –5, The model selector disappears for free users and loses relevance even among payment. Openai has designed a system that decides by the user: the new model knows when he has to think more and when he is not needed. If the task requires complex reasoning, GPT -5 takes it easy. If it is simple, respond instantly. The old chatgpt model selector, today already out of the scene This changes the rules of the game. Not only because it saves unnecessary time and decisions, but because it finally places intelligence where it should be from the beginning: at the user’s service, without having to know how it works inside. GPT -5 behaves more similar to us. Not because he is aware, much less, but because Start deciding in real time If a task requires thinking or not. As we do. When someone asks us a simple question, we answer quickly. When something demands analysis, we take a few more seconds. That is the logic that begins to replicate this model: if it takes effort, it applies it. If not, prioritize speed. GPT -5 behaves more similar to us In the background, that was what we expected of an advanced artificial intelligence. That understands us without giving technical instructions. That anticipates, That chooses by themselves how to help us better. That the model decides on your own does not mean that we have lost control. In fact, payment users can still manually force the type of response they want. From the chatgpt interface, the mode of reasoning with a button can be activated. But it can also be done with a simple instruction in the message: “Think about it”, “do it fast”, “give me a light answer” … the system interprets these phrases and adjust your behavior. It is a subtle, but important change. Because although GPT – 5 self -managed, It is still possible to intervene and refine experience. Whoever wants depth, can ask for it. Who wants immediacy, too. For those who use chatgpt intensively – at work, in studies, in complex tasks – this change has direct consequences. Before, a user could be paying for a tool that he did not understand at all, without knowing that he was using only part of his potential. Now, even if I don’t have time to experience or learn how everything works, GPT -5 does that job for him. Artificial intelligence finally begins to function as it should: offering the best without asking for explanations. And that means that those who did not know that they were losing productivity … can stop losing it. The difference between those who knew how to combine models and those who not, between those who explored each variant and those who stayed on the surface, have been reduced to minimums. From now on, the quality of experience will depend much more on how we ask for things that we know or not what a model to use. And that is good news, especially for those who never touched the selector. Users who, without changing anything in their way of interacting, They will start getting answers improves, more tight, more useful. GPT-5 equals them with the advanced ones without having to move a finger. GPT -5 does not add a new function. Correct an old incoherence. Until now, the most powerful system was hidden after technical decisions that few knew how to take. It is now in the foreground. Images | Xataka with Gemini 2.5 Flash | Xataka screen capture In Xataka | The AI has so far a nice accessory: with GPT-5, OpenAi wants to place it in the center of all things

His model is not only powerful and free, but it has cost much less

by

Openai yesterday launched its first models with open weights since 2019: GPT-Oss-120B and GPT-Oss-20B. Two reasoning systems that mark a radical change in the company’s strategy after Deepseek R1’s success At the beginning of the year. Why is it important. Openai has gone from defending the safety of closed models to recognize that “it was on the wrong side of history” with open models. The earthquake that caused Deepseek In January he forced them to rethink their entire strategy. The context. Until now, Openai had kept all its models closed since GPT-2justifying it for security reasons. But rivals as a goal with Calls And especially Chinese companies with Depseek, Qwen and Kimi They have gained ground in the open ecosystem. The turning point came when Depseek R1 showed that it was possible to create advanced reasoning models with a fraction of the cost of Americans. Sam Altman then admitted that Openai needed “finding a different open source strategy.” And here it is. In figures: The major model, GPT-Oss-120bworks at a single 80 GB GPU with just 5,100 million active parameters of its 117,000 million total. His little brother, GPT-Oss-20bit can be executed in a laptop with 16 GB of memory (although the speed seems to be very slow with such a configuration, in the absence that we can try it more thoroughly). The current situation. The Benchmarks independent They place GPT-Oss-120b with a score of 58 in the intelligence indexsurpassing O3-mini but being below O3 and O4-mini. In competitive programming tasks it reaches 2622 points in Codeforces, while Depseek R1 achieves less score with a much heavier model. In detail. Architecture uses a system of Mix of experts (Moe, Mixture of experts) that activates only a fraction of the total parameters for each consultation. This allows the 120,000 million model of parameters to activate only 4.4% in each consultation, while the 20,000 million activates 17.2%. Both models maintain chain reasoning ability without direct supervision, following the principle that visible reasoning is necessary to detect undue behaviors. Yes, but. OpenAI has not made public training data, maintaining part of the secret. Nor does it include multimodal capabilities, limited only to text. Hallucinations are significantly higher than in their own models: 49% and 53% respectively compared to 16% of O1. Between the lines. This launch responds to both Chinese competitive pressure and the new Trump administration, which has urged US companies to release more technology to “promote the global adoption of aligned with American values.” The company has worked with partners such as Orange, Snowflake and AI Sweden for real use cases, seeking to validate whether the advantages justify continuing to invest in open models. Deepen. The models are available under Apache 2.0 license on platforms such as Hugging Facewith native support in tools such as Ollama, LM Studio and Services Cloud of the main suppliers. Openai has organized a network Teaming Challenge with $ 500,000 in prizes to identify security risks. This is OpenAi’s response to his Deepseek moment: recognizing that open innovation is not only inevitable, but necessary to stay competitive in a panorama where cost and accessibility matter as much as performance. In Xataka | The GPT-5 paradox: OpenAi needs the greatest jump in the history of AI just when it seems most impossible Outstanding image | Solen FeyissabDima Solomin

OpenAi has just kick the AI board. Your new model is free and can be downloaded to use from the laptop

by

Although his name suggests a certain vocation of technological opening, Openai had been moving away from that spirit for some time. From long before the launch of Chatgptin November 2022, the company did not publish an open weight model. In fact, it is the first open weight model since 2019 (GPT-2). That has just changed. This Tuesday, OpenAi has announced GPT-Ossan open weight model under Apache 2.0 license that can be downloaded for free and, in its small variant, run even in a laptop. A movement that nobody expected at all, especially since all eyes were put in Lat the imminent arrival of GPT-5. What is GPT-Oss? GPT-Oss is a language model developed by OpenAI, capable of understanding text instructions and generating answers with a high level of coherence, context and utility. It is a variant of the GPT family, the same technology that gave rise to Chatgpt, but with a key difference: its weights are open. That is, you can download it, run it on your own computer and adapt it to your needs. For the first time in years, OpenAI launches a powerful model that is not tied to its platform. You can use it without internet connection, without depending on your servers and freely to customize it. And besides, it is free. That opens the door for developers, small companies or even advanced users can experiment with AI in their own terms. What means that the weights are open? When we talk about the “pesos” of a model are open, we refer to the internal numerical values that you have learned during your training. They are, in essence, the knowledge of the model: what allows you to reason, write, translate or generate useful answers. That OpenAi has released those weights means that anyone can download them, analyze them and use them outside their servers. It is not the same as releasing the complete source code or the data with which it was trained, but it is an important step: it allows you to execute the model in own environments, adapt it to concrete tasks or integrate it into products without having to go through the Openai API. So is it a really “open” model? Now, the weights are open does not mean that the model is completely open. GPT -Oss is not Open Source strictly speaking: OpenAi has not published the data with which the model or the full code of the training process trained. What has released, as we say, is the final result, the parameters learned, under a permissive license (Apache 2.0). That is why we talk about an open weight model, not open source, According to the standards of organizations such as the Open Source Initiative (OSI). Can I use it on my computer? It depends on the model. GPT-Oss occurs in two versions: one of 120,000 million parameters and a lighter of 20,000 million. The most powerful version requires a GPU of at least 80 GB of memory (professional environments). The 20B version is much more accessible: it can be executed on computers with 16 GB of memory, which opens the door to use in personal portables and PCs. It is already compatible with tools such as LM Studio (which we have used to try Deepseek and other models)flame.CPP or VLLM, which allows you to try it at home without connecting to the cloud or depending on OpenAi. Of course, it is recommended to have some technical experience to put everything in motion. It is compatible with tools such as LM Studio, Llama.CPP or VLLM. Where do I download it? Is it really free? Weights are available for free download mainly in Hugging Faceand can also be deployed through platforms such as Azure, AWS or Databricks. The two variants, 120b and 20b, together with the necessary documentation are available. OpenAI publishes GPT-Oss under Apache 2.0 license, which means that you can use it, modify it and adapt it for commercial purposes. Do not pay for download or use it at home. If you choose to execute it in the cloud or on a payment infrastructure, the cost will depend on the supplier you use. Is it easy to use or do you have to have a certain level of knowledge? Using GPT-Oss is not as complicated as training a model from scratch, but it is not a solution that works with two clicks. The models include clear instructions and are integrated into platforms such as LM Studio or Llama.cpp, which allow them to be executed at local ease. That said, you will need to understand basic concepts such as execution environment, models loading and parameter configuration. If you have already worked with other open weight models, it will not cost you. If not, there are guides available, but you will have to devote some time to put it to function as it is. What can this model do? GPT-Oss is a multi-support model. You can reason, generate text, write code, answer questions, search for information and operate external tools, such as python browsers or interpreters. All this is also compatible with agents based on workflows, useful for more complex and automated tasks. Openai states that the 120B model achieves a proximity with O4-MINI in reasoning tests, while the 20B model offers similar results to O3-MINI in Common Benchmarks, with a good performance in programming, reasoning for steps and use of tools. It is not the most powerful model of the house, but one of the most versatile that can be used without paying or depending on your API. Images | OpenAI In Xataka | A watchmaking pump threatens the most powerful alliance of technology: Microsoft’s AGI clause Images | OpenAI In Xataka | A watchmaking pump threatens the most powerful alliance of technology: Microsoft’s AGI clause

How the South Korean aesthetic industry turned its beauty model into a global product

by

In The era of filters, Collagen capsules and “glass” promisesbeauty has ceased to be local. It is no longer enough to go to the trusted aestheticist or continue A ten steps routine in front of the mirror. Today, to reach the ideal of globalized aesthetic perfection, many take a flight. And the most wanted destiny is not Paris or Beverly Hills, but Seoul. A booming industry. South Korea has become the epicenter of beauty tourism, a global trend that not only transforms faces, but also cultural imaginary and economic figures. In a report for The Timesmore than one million medical tourists traveled to South Korea in 2024, according to data from the Ministry of Health and Welfare. 68 % did so specifically to undergo aesthetic procedures, whether plastic surgery or dermatological treatments. And the sector does not stop growing. According to Grand View Researchthe South Korean aesthetic industry – valued at 2.4 billion dollars in 2024 – could exceed 6,300 million in 2030, promoted by international demand and advances in aesthetic technology. An experience “everything in one”. As They have detailed in The TimesGangnam district clinics-yes, the same PSY’s global hit-offer these types of experiences with packages that include 3D facial scanners, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, intravenous sera, microwave treatments to sculpt the face and even functional desserts such as pumpkin purés for post-treatment recovery. The British influencer and doctor Ewoma Ukeleghe shared in The Times Your experience: six treatments in one day, among them they rejure (An injection of salmon DNA) and Lifting wave. The promise of perfection. This boom is not accidental. As We already wrote in Xatakathe phenomenon feeds on multiple factors: the global impact of K-Pop and K-Drams, the Tiktok virality of products such as the Sheet Masks or the Korean tonic, and the rise of star ingredients such as collagen. Korean beauty not only offers visible results, but also an aspirational aesthetic wrapped in ritual, pop and science culture. However, there is also a dark side. As Dr. Christine Hall warns In The TimesIn South Korea there is an intense social pressure to maintain an impeccable image. “Presenting the best version of oneself is a sign of respect for others,” he explains. This logic, which may seem positive on the surface, encourages an extreme culture of perfectionism that, over time, can generate significant psychological impacts: from anxiety related to appearance to dependence on aesthetic treatments to sustain self -esteem. Unequal attention. Despite its international success, the system is not fully adapted to the foreign tourist. Although many clinics have personnel who speak English, others still depend on automatic translators such as Google Translate. In the Times report They tell the story of Ukeleghe, who reported how a nurse approached with an injection without explaining what it was; She, being a medical one, understood that it was a corticosteroid. But a patient without knowledge could have panicked. In addition, there is a real lack of attention to ethnic diversity. As experts in Byrdie point outNot all clinics have experience in working with skin tones other than Asia. This can lead to unexpected results, especially in laser or pigmentation treatments. The new Türkiye? The phenomenon reminds the boom of aesthetic surgeries in Türkiye or Colombia. In 2022, the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Armegoons reported a 35% increase in complications among British patients who traveled to Türkiye for procedures such as liposuctions or implants, According to The Times. On the other hand, in Colombia, procedures such as the “360 liposculpture” or the increase in buttocks achieved such popularity that they attracted tourism from whole countries, although they were also subject to research for deaths and bad praxis, As The New York Times reported. And South Korea is not exempt from risks. During his visit, Ukeleghe rejected sedation precisely for not being clear about the presence of an anesthetist in case of emergency. In social networks, a viral video circulated – then eliminated – in which an American woman denounced having lost vision in an eye after a complication with Juvenlook, one of the most popular treatments in Korea. Although the case was not officially verified, the event generated concern and debate. In addition, Dr. Hall warns of “factory” clinics that apply treatments with just minutes of previous evaluation, reducing costs at the expense of security. The pressure of not aging. The rise of collagen as a magical solution for youth is no stranger to this ecosystem. As we wrote in Xatakahas become a symbol of self -care, but also of aesthetic anxiety. Although some studies point to mild benefits in elasticity or joint health, many are funded by the brands themselves. Even so, marketing insists: hydrolyzed, vegetable collagen, peptides, exosomes … Everything is sold as the new elixir. But perhaps the problem is not in the ingredients, but in a society that penalizes any trace of the passage of time, especially in women. The female social and professional invisibility when aging is not a myth: it is documented. More, less scalpel. The next border of Korean beauty tourism is marked by artificial intelligence and extreme customization. According to Byrdietreatments created from genetic analysis, facial scans and aging prediction algorithms are expected. Beauty becomes not only attainable, but calculable. A symptom that goes further. In this context, it may be worth asking if the real challenge is not in technology, but in ideal. In other words, perhaps the collagen is not the elixir of youth, but the reflection of a society that seeks to stop the clock at all costs. Dr. Hall emphasizes that the aesthetic innovation in Korea advances at such a speed that some treatments that promise to be revolutionaries end up disappearing before consolidating or even arriving in Europe. What today is a trend, tomorrow can be obsolete. Meanwhile, the clinics are still full, the flights to Seoul are sold as an investment in oneself and the hashtags like #kbeeautytrip do not stop accumulating millions of visualizations. Perhaps the real challenge is not to soften … Read more

This is what Hollywood saturation model seeks

by

We know that feeling: Pedro Pascal seems to be appearing in all the films of the world. In all important, at least: you just saw it in ‘The Last of Us‘And you already have it in’The fantastic 4‘. And within nothing, in the movie of ‘The Mandalorian‘. And the worst thing is not that it comes out in movies and series, it is that it continually jumps on the Internet: microvideos, spots, interviews, viral. And paradoxically, guilt is not yours, but how Hollywood works today. An busy man. Let us recognize that Pascal is an authentic stove of acting, and since he rose in ‘Narcos’, he has not stopped chaining important roles: from 2019, ‘The Mandalorian’ (although he did not see his face), three series in 2021, ‘The last of us’ since 2023. And in cinema, three films in 2022, five in 2024 ‘Gladiator II‘), three in 2025 (the new of Ari Aster, the commented – Spain arrives in August -‘ materialistic ‘and the aforementioned’ the fantastic 4). And for at least 2026, he plans his interventions in the Star Wars and Marvel franchises. Why everywhere. Pascal’s career lives a “global star” effect thanks to being present in those three great franchises of the moment (Marvel, ‘Star Wars’ and ‘The Last of Us’). Thus it has become one of the most recognizable and popular faces of the industry, and it is not the result of chance, but a combination of indisputable talent and a natural charism that makes him connect with the audience both on screen and outside it (that’s why we are also seeing it in ads such as Apple’s directed by Spike Jonze). His sense of humor It has generated genuine empathy, contributing to a nearby image. Franchise world. Hollywood lives immersed in a production model that tries to reduce financial risks by force of Set off any glimpse of experimentation. The huge production costs force great studies to focus on established franchises, something that the box office supports with results as clear as last year, where The ten higher films were all sequelsremakes and derivatives. And therefore, actors like Pedro Pascal They become omnipresent: They embody characters in these universes and acquire enormous visibility by becoming key pieces. Saturation logic. The promotion of these franchises has evolved towards a model of Constant presence in all channels. Studies use aggressive strategies (Fragmented interviewsstaggered content launches, incessant activity in social networks like Tiktok, Instagram and YouTube) … what makes The public can perceive that they are receiving without stop stimuli related to franchises. The great injured are actors like Pedro Pascal, giving the feeling of appearing everywhere but unable to control that cadence. Lack of relief. Parallel to this logic of maximizing the exposure of the IP to keep it alive we have another phenomenon: there are no generational relays among the interpreters. Of course, there are new young actors, but many young actors They leave the industry due to lack of opportunities. The Post-pandemic austerity policy It prevents us from living phenomena such as those of the 80s, the 90s or the first two thousands, when they walked from young actors led each generation. As a producer affirms in This article The Hollywood Reporter, “Hollywood has spent too much time making franchises the star instead of building the next talent generation. We have not encouraged writers to create vehicles that generate stars.” The lack of risk on the part of the producers also affects this issue: they want the delivery to be full of safe values, without space for doubts. Always the same, always Pedro Pascal. Header | Disney In Xataka | The figures suggest that the domain of blockbusters in Hollywood is not over. In fact, it will go worse

The model that dominated technology for 50 years has died

by

The numbers do not usually lie, especially in the long term. And Intel’s figures during the last decade speak of a historical replication. Of A giant come less in an alarming way. In figures. In 2015, Intel’s stock capitalization multiplied by Nvidia. Almost ten years later, that of Nvidia, the first company in history to exceed four billion dollars, multiplies by 41! to Intel, which has been jibarized at a time when it has been exceeded by many lower companies. A brutal change that symbolizes the change of technological era: Nvidia’s boom first for its GPUS sales for cryptocurrency mining and then for the training of AI models. Intel’s decline due to its inconsequence in the mobile era, the rival boom in CPUS, or the passage of Microsoft or Apple to ARM. And not only Nvidia has advanced. Also Texas Instruments, Qualcomm, AMD … Gelsinger’s legacy. The contrast. In 2006, Intel refused to make chips for the iPhone Because I considered that Apple was too small. That same year, Intel tried to buy Nvidia For 20,000 million dollars, but Jensen Huang refused. Today these decisions have completely checked Intel’s route, which at the beginning of the century was always in the top 10 of world companies by stock market and today is close to leaving the Top 200. The threat. The Hard recent admission of CEO Intel, Lip-Bu Tan, that Intel is no longer among the top 10 of semiconductors, says many more things. The company that fed the PC revolution, which created the Wintel ecosystem that dominated for decades and was synonymous with American innovation, now is worth less than Spotify, Coinbase or Iberdrola. Yes, but. The 5,500 new layoffs announced by Intel They are more than an adjustment or cut. In California, almost 2,000 jobs will disappear. In Oregon, almost 3,000. In total, 20% of the workforce will be fired. The workers who developed the technology that moved the world are now expendable. The turn. Intel has outsourced TSMC 30% of its production by 2025. Paradoxical in a company that presumed its vertical integration, which controlled from design to manufacturing. And that now depends on his Taiwanese rival to survive. A symbolic surrender: the king of manufacturing asking for help to who removed the throne. Between the lines. The strategy of pivoting to the edge announced by so sounds like last minute refuge. “It’s too late for us“The CEO admitted. It is not only to recognize the loss against Nvidia, it is to recognize the loss in the most important race of what we have been from the century: that of AI. And another paradox: China represents 29% of Intel’s incomemore than any other market. The most iconic American technology company depends more on China than its own market. Trump is focused on technological independence in this legislature … … but Intel needs China to stay alive. Turning point. He 18A process That must save Intel by 2025 generates certain doubts. And if he fails, Intel runs out of his last asset to compete with TSMC. If it triumphs, it will be a partial victory, since it will be arriving five years late to the battle. This Intel fall also symbolizes something else: the end of the vertical integration model in chips represented Intel against Nvidia’s specialization model. The first designs and manufactures. The second designs but leaves manufacturing in the hands of TSMC. And hence the problem for the West: advanced manufacturing is concentrated in Asia and the value is redistributed. In Xataka | In its darkest time Intel is receiving a crucial economic support from its best client: China Outstanding image | Intel

Nintendo Switch 2 After a month of use, we tried the new Tesla Model and Juniper and much more in 1×15 crossover

by

Friday arrives and that means two things: that the weekend is just around the corner and that the New Crossover episode. As always, we are facing a very varied program in which we talk about the new Nintendo Switch 2 And our experience during this first month of life, of Peter Thiel and of the new Tesla Model Y. Videogames, PayPal Mafia And technological cars, there is nothing. First, Carlos and Jaume discover with our partner Javier Pastor the peculiar story of Peter Thiela well -known executive from Silicon Valley who co -founded Paypal and whose fortune amounts to more than 2,000 million dollars. It was also the first investors on Facebook and, today, is dedicated to the world of Big Data, Intelligence and Security in Palantir. Then Jaume tells us how his experience with the new Tesla Model and Juniper. The firm has refined the formula in its new SUV, offering better materials and finishes, an optimized dynamic and a Price/autonomy ratio that is still one of the best in the market. Of course, it still has things to improve and the competition squeezes more than ever. Finally, we review how the Nintendo Switch 2 for a montha console that has proven to be as juicy as polarizing. The new Nintendo laptop wins in potential, materials and ergonomics, but its screen, despite having won seclies, is already LCD again to have an improvable brightness level. We would also have liked to have enjoyed better autonomy. On YouTube | Crossover

Grok 4 destroys the tests and aims to be the most advanced AI model. The problem is that Elon Musk continues to sabotage his answers

by

Xai has launched Grok 4its new artificial intelligence model that is sweeping the most demanding performance tests in the sector. The model exceeds OpenAi, Google and Anthropic proposals in multiple benchmarks. And is that in the absence of knowing OpenAI’s strategy with GPT-5At the moment it has all the ballots of being the most pointer the model. However, Grok continues to drag the usual problems: controversial responses, offensive content and an Elon Musk using the model to subtract credibility. The numbers speak alone. In the test Humanity’s last examconsidered one of the most difficult to measure abilities of AI, XAI states that Grok 4 has achieved 25.4% Without additional tools, surpassing O3 of Openai (21%) and Gemini 2.5 Pro from Google (21.6%). But it is with Grok 4 Heavy, its multiagente version, where the results shoot: according to the company, reaches 44.4% With ‘tools’, almost doubleing competition. Image: XAI In addition, at the benchmark ARC-AGI-2which measures the ability to solve complex visual patterns, Grok 4 has obtained 16.2%practically double the next commercial model. According to Musk“Grok 4 exceeds the doctoral level in all subjects, without exception”, an affirmation that, although it sounds to marketing, is supported by the results obtained. The revolutionary approach. Grok 4 Heavy works with A “multiple agents” system that work in parallel about the same problem, then comparing their results as if it were a study group. This architecture allows you to climb intelligence according to the available computational power, a concept that could redefine how we understand the AI ​​performance. Image: XAI The usual problems. The launch of Grok 4 occurs just after the previous version of the chatbot published anti -Semitic comments In X, even identifying as “Mechahitler” in some answers. XAI had to temporarily withdraw the service and eliminate offensive publications, while countries like Poland They announced complaints before the European Commission and Türkiye blocked access to chatbot. The cause was a modification in the system instructions that allowed the model “not to avoid politically incorrect statements.” Although Xai withdrew that guideline, the damage was already done. A constant sabotage. Despite these technical advances, Musk continues to condition Grok’s responses in ways that compromise their usefulness. The model performs automatic searches for the opinions of the tycoon in X to respond to controversial issues, turning the alleged search for “truth” into an echo of its creator’s ideas. This practice, confirmed By experts in AI like Carlos Santana, he once again demonstrates how Musk’s controversial decisions are directly influencing the development of the model. In addition, several researchers already They have managed to avoid Easily model safety barriers, making it generate content on chemical weapons, malicious software, drugs and other sensitive issues through relatively simple jailbreak techniques. Ethan Mollick, professor at Warton and an expert at AI, Point out The lack of transparency of the company: ‘There is no detailed technical documentation, risk analysis or explanations on how to avoid future incidents’. This opacity makes it difficult for companies to trust Grok for critical applications. Grok 4 prices. XAI Grok 4 Basic offers at a price of about 30 dollars a month. However, the company has also launched Supergrok Heavy, a subscription of $ 300 per month in which its most advanced model is offered and that directly becomes the most expensive market service on the market. What is coming. XAI plans to launch a programming model in August, multimodal agents in September and video generation in October. Also will integrate Grok 4 in Tesla vehicles Next week, expanding the scope of AI throughout the Musk ecosystem. The question is whether the company will separate the technical excellence of the media controversies that surround it, or if it will remain hostage of its founder’s impulsive decisions. Cover image | XAI In Xataka | We knew that AI would generate new jobs that did not exist before. What we did not expect is that he was fixing his pifias

There is a Granada cooperative demonstrating that the opposite model to Mercadona also works: Covir will

by

The large supermarket chains have market share and penetration – or in An extraordinarily high profit margin for your sector-, but there are alternative models that without appearing at the top of those rankings, they are also successful in their own parameters. Covirán is a good case study: it is sustaining in Spain and Portugal, building an empire of proximity. Why is it important. Covirán represents the alternative approach to the dominant distribution model. Your growth strategy (rural, cooperative) goes against nature of a sector used to consolidation. This Granadina cooperative closed 2024 with revenues of 1,846 million euros (everything that is sold in all stores operating under its teaching), and with 617 million business figure of the gripo (which really invoices as a company). The negative reading is that it was just 0.13% more than in 2023. The positive reading is that the flat figure tells another story: it is changing its business model while conquering more territories. Its benefit was 2.34 million euros over 617 million. 0.38% that sounds low because it is, but that allows you to get benefit, unlike older groups such as

The Xiaomi electric SUV is already priced in China. Yu7 is a direct dart to Tesla Model and

by

Xiaomi today faces one of the most relevant events for the company in 2025. One in which they have revealed Your first smart glasseshe Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 and the price of YU7, the electric SUV that accompanies the Berlina Su7. After presenting it last May, it was only necessary to know how much it cost to access the most technological Xiaomi car to date. We already have the data on the table and, to surprise that no one is a dart for Tesla. 253,500 yuan. The price of Xiaomi Yu7 is 253,500 yuan, about 30,191 euros to change. It is an aggressive price that shoots towards the Model andcurrently with a price that starts from 263,500 in China, about 31,351 euros to change. Xiaomi Yu7: 253,500 yuan, about 30,191 euros to change. Xiaomi Yu7 Pro: 279 900 yuan, about 33,335 euros to change. Xiaomi Yu7 Max: 329,900 yuan, about 39,290 euros to change. The price is base, and varies depending on the colors we choose. In addition to the base colors (blue, green and orange), the rest adds 7,000 yuan, 832 euros to change to each purchase. The car can be purchased in China from the brand’s own app from 10:00 p.m. It is a launch that remembers more than that of a telephone than that of a car. The accessories. Xiaomi has found in the YU7 a machine to sell not only the car itself, but also its accessories. Transport Blankets Aluminum vessels Toy miniatures in different sizes Colors Carbon fiber finishes Personalized seats Aerodynamic Kits Economic base price for those who need more than the car. Personalization and accessories to the end for which he looks for a much more complete purchase experience. Why is it important. China is The country that buys more electric carsand win this market is key to a manufacturer who, since the birth of its automotive division, aspires to climb to Top 3. know-how Acquired with the Berlina Su7 to one of the most popular formats not only in China, but in the world: the SUV format. The Xiaomi Yu7 thus points directly to Tesla Model Y. The car of Elon Musk’s company It is the best selling SUV in Chinaand Xiaomi has refined specification specification to try to overcome it. They have demonstrated it with data. What does Yu7 offer. The Xiaomi SUV has a remarkably superior autonomy even in its basic version, with 835 km compared to the 593km of Tesla Model and RWD, according to the Chinese homologation cycle CLTC. The computing capacity is remarkably superior thanks to the Nvidia Thor platform, and is a much more technological car: self -adaptable suspensions, gigantic HUD with information from information from Hyperosetc. It also exceeds Model and in load speed (only 21 minutes to obtain almost 500 kilometers of autonomy), acceleration, tip and useful space, a section to which Xiaomi gives special importance to be a family SUV, bending it in Tops. The Su7 has already marked the way. Xiaomi announced its first electric car just a few months ago, with the launch of the SU7. In less than a year, he has managed to overcome sales to Tesla Model 3, placing itself as the fourth best -selling car in China at the beginning of 2025 Analyzing the global photo of sedan vehicles. At the end of 2024, the Xiaomi Su7 entered the top 20 of best -selling cars in China, with an unbeatable ByD and a Tesla with a model and in second position, above the other national models. It’s just the beginning. Xiaomi has just started selling electric cars, and has already managed to sneak into the Top 20 Chinese and Top 5 by categories. Beyond numbers, it has proven to live up (or above) of giants of the sector such as Tesla, Byd or Geely, with dynamic records in the largest dynamic benchmark to which an electric car can access: The nürburgring circuit. He already told us Abi Go in 2022: The electric car will be a fundamental piece in the Xiaomi ecosystem. And if we are clear is that there is something that the Chinese company obsesses as anyone: sell more than its rivals. Image | Xiaomi In Xataka | The Xiaomi Su7 self -imposed a challenge: to eat Porsche in his own land. And they just got it

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.