differences

the most important differences in the new generation of Samsung

by

Samsung has presented the new generation of its folding mobile phones through the new Unpacked, with new versions of the two already well-known models and a third brother that aims to be the competition for the folding iPhone. However, we are going to go point by point reviewing the differences between the two most traditional modelswhich are the most different. Technical data sheet of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Dimensions and weight Folding: 75.4 x 85.7 x 13.1mm Displayed: 75.4 x 166.9 x 6.1mm 180 grams Folding: 81.9 x 123.9 x 9.7mm Displayed: 161.4 x 123.9 x 4.5mm 201 grams folding screen 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X FullHD+ resolution (1,080 x 2,520 pixels) 400 pixels per inch 3,000 nits Refresh rate: 1-120Hz Vision Booster 7.6-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X QXGA+ resolution (2,448 x 1,848 pixels) 403 pixels per inch Refresh rate: 1-120Hz Vision Booster secondary / main screen 4.1-inch Super AMOLED Refresh rate: 60/120 Hz Resolution 948 x 1,048 pixels 5.5-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X QXGA+ resolution (1,248 x 1,972 pixels) 428 pixels per inch Refresh rate: 1-120Hz Vision Booster Up to 3,000 nits Low reflectance screen processor Exynos 2600 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy Ram memory and storage 12/256GB 12/512GB 12/256GB 12/512GB 16GB/1TB main camera 50 MP wide angle, dual pixel AF, OIS, f/1.8, FOV 85º 12 MP wide angle, f/2.2, 123º FOV 50 MP wide angle, dual pixel AF, OIS, f/1.8, FOV 85º 50 MP wide angle, dual pixel AF, f/1.9, FOV 120º front camera 10 MP, f/2.2, FOV 85º Main screen: 10 MP, f/2.2, FOV 85º Folding screen: 10 MP, f/2.2, FOV 100º battery Dual 4,300 mAh (typical) 25W fast charging 15W wireless charging PowerShare Reverse Wireless Charging Dual 4,800 mAh (typical) 45W fast charging 20W wireless charging PowerShare Reverse Wireless Charging price From 1,299 euros From 1,999 euros At first glance you can take a look at the most notable differences between the two new phones. However, we are going to delve into the most differential characteristics. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, 256GB The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, 256GB The price could vary. We earn commission from these links What type of user are you? Two completely different formats He Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 They differ in many ways, but above all they do it in their formats. The first follows the line of previous generations, betting on a format with a horizontal fold and a clamshell design, while the second has a book format with a vertical fold. This… what does it mean? The Z Flip8 is more oriented for those people looking for a small mobilesince when folded horizontally it takes up very little space (85.7 mm high). The second is more oriented to multimedia content consumptionsince through the vertical fold we can use a much larger screen (7.6 inches) to watch videos, but above all to use certain applications such as social networks, some of which are very well optimized for this format. Processors: following the line of the Galaxy S26 We also found a big difference between the processors, something somewhat logical considering that the two phones will be launched with very different prices. In any case, the Z Flip8 is committed to Exynos 2600the same one we found in the Samsung Galaxy S26 and S26+. Instead, Samsung has decided to follow the same line as with the launch of its high-end mobile phones, betting on a Z Fold8 that incorporates the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 from Qualcomm, the same processor that we can find in the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. The battery and its fast charging At the moment it is too early to talk about autonomy, but what we do know is what batteries each of the new Samsung phones has. For the Z Flip8 we have a 4,300 mAh dual batterythe same one we saw in the previous generation with the Z Flip7. In the case of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, the brand has opted for a 4,800 mAh dual batterygiving in this case a small leap in terms of capacity with respect to the previous generation. We are talking about a difference of 400 mAh: it is not very large, but it is especially appreciated when using the folding screen, which is the largest and the one that consumes the most battery. Now, if we talk about the fast wired chargingthe Galaxy Z Flip8 maintains 25W, a very small figure for the range (and era) in which we find ourselves. On the other hand, the Galaxy Z Fold8 increases the charging power, raising it to 45W, a figure more in line with what we see both from Samsung and other brands. What prices do the new mobile phones have? Both the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 are two high-end phones. However, as we have seen so many times in previous generations, mobile phones have very different prices. He Galaxy Z Flip8 will go on sale for a price from 1,299 euroswhile the Galaxy Z Fold8 will be priced from 1,999 euros. However, even though these are the official prices, stores are beginning to launch introductory offers. At Samsung, for example, the Delivery and Release campaign is available while MediaMarkt offers a discount when registering (and logging in) in the store. Why buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a mobile phone that is clear about its audience, offering features that we do not see in other models of the brand. Its key points are: The format: Its folded size makes it a very compact mobile phone that is ideal for those people looking for a smartphone that takes up very little space in their bag or pocket. The use: The Galaxy Z Flip8 is aimed at general and non-specific use, whether for making calls, consuming multimedia content or … Read more

The differences between Qualcomm and MediaTek in 2026 are getting smaller. This is very good news for Android phones.

by

A while ago, buying a mobile phone with a MediaTek processor was synonymous with settling. If you wanted raw power, fast updates and good efficiencyyou had to look for the Qualcomm Snapdragon seal on the mobile box. But it is true that this is something that has completely changed in 2026. Today, the gap between the two processor firms is narrower. And, although purists continue to debate figures in the benchmarksthe reality is that the great similarity (today) between these chips is the best news that could have happened to the Android ecosystem in the last decade. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5g 6.9″ 256gb Black The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Mediocre low-end mobile phones are dead The main victory in 2026 is not only in mobile phones of 1,200 euros, but in those of 300 euros or less. MediaTekwith its series Dimensionshas achieved something that seemed impossible: offering good power, 5G connectivity ultra-low latency and 3-nanometer manufacturing processes in devices that do not require a large investment or financing of the purchase. Qualcomm, for its part, has had to react. It is no longer enough to master the high range; Pressure from MediaTek has forced those from San Diego to vitaminize your series 6 and 7making a current mid-range mobile perform like a flagship from just two years ago. Of course, it is true that both brands of processors have been putting in the work. pressure from China with Xiaomi or Huawei pushing their own processors. So, despite being competition between them, they are not two firms oblivious to everything that is happening in the sector at the moment. The new battlefield is Artificial Intelligence If there is one thing that defines the processors of 2026, it is their ability to process generative AI locally. Both brands have NPUs dedicated for several generations. MediaTek integrates its own APU (AI Processing Unit) with capabilities comparable to Qualcomm’s Hexagon. On a day-to-day basis, the difference for the user is practically negligible. Whether it’s editing in 8K video or asking your assistant to summarize a document, both manufacturers offer a fluidity that has eliminated the famous Android jerks of yesteryear. How does this rapprochement between MediaTek and Qualcomm benefit us as consumers? When there is no clear dominator, the winner is the consumer. This technical parity (due to the clear technical rapprochement between MediaTek and Qualcomm) has caused three immediate effects on the market: Price war: To compete with Qualcomm’s raw performance, MediaTek offers its chips at more aggressive prices, allowing manufacturers like Xiaomi, Realme or Samsung itself to adjust their margins. Best updates: MediaTek driver support has improved dramatically, forcing Qualcomm to not sleep and promise increasingly longer Android update periods. Accelerated innovation: Today, competition for energy efficiency is fierce. In 2026, we have more powerful mobile phones than ever; However, they will stretch the battery beyond the intensive day thanks to this rivalry. The end of prejudices In 2026, choosing a smartphone based solely on the brand of the processor is a mistake. We have reached a technological maturity point where MediaTek is no longer the cheap alternative, but a first-class option and Qualcomm has had to get off the pedestal to fight in the field of quality-price. This is an ideal scenario. It no longer matters what engine (that is, processor) your Android has under the hood; What matters is that, for the first time, both types of chips they run at the same speed. Some mobile phones with these processors that may interest you High range Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5): is a benchmark in raw power and image processing. Qualcomm maintains a slight advantage here in professional video processing and advanced 5G connectivity. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5g 6.9″ 256gb Black The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Oppo Find X9 Pro (MediaTek Dimensity 9500): a great rival for the Samsung model that has a MediaTek chip is Oppo. On a day-to-day basis, the difference is almost non-existent between both models, although Oppo is achieving higher thermal efficiency rates. OPPO Find X9 Pro 5G 16+512GB The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Mid range Nothing Phone (3) (Snapdragon 8s Gen 4): Qualcomm has had to lower the power of its high ranges to this chip so as not to lose the throne of the premium mid-range, offering an electric and fluid experience in this Nothing Phone (3). Nothing Phone (3) – 12GB + 256GB The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Poco X8 Pro (MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra): It is one of the kings in value for money. MediaTek allows this Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro perform like a top-of-the-range phone from just a year ago, but maintaining a moderate price. XIAOMI POCO X8 Pro – 8+256GB Smartphone The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Javier Lacort (Xataka), Iván Linares (Xataka), Álex Alcolea (Xataka) and Xataka Móvil In Xataka | The best mobile phones, we have tested them and here are their analyzes In Xataka | Best wireless headphones. Which one to buy and 21 models from 15 euros to 470 euros

Five daily tasks where the differences between a high-end processor and a more humble one are very noticeable

by

It is very common to hear phrases like “to surf the Internet and watch four videos, any 200 euro cell phone will do.” It is partly true, but there is a difference between choosing a high end processor (as Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or an Apple A19 Pro) and a low-mid range one (like a Dimension 7000 or a Snapdragon 4 or 6). Apple iPhone 17 Pro 256GB with A19 Pro chip The price could vary. We earn commission from these links The differences are not only measured in seconds, but in the quality of experience. It is true that it is not that the humblest processor cannot do the tasks; It’s how he makes them. Do you want to discover five everyday situations in which the difference between having one processor or another can be abysmal? I show them to you below. Real multitasking and app refreshes Have you ever been writing an email, gone out for a second to copy some information from WhatsAppand when you return the email has been closed and you have to load it again? This is what is known as the multitasking management. In the high range: The processor manages RAM and duty cycles so you can jump between 10 open apps and they’re all right where you left them. In practice, switching between apps feels immediate and seamless. In the mid-low range: The system “kills” apps in the background to save resources. It’s a small one-second lag every time you change apps and it can end up being a frustration on a day-to-day basis. Low battery consumption 5G or WiFi 6 At the high end, the SoC is extremely fast and does the task in an instant and returns to sleep immediately. Furthermore, their 5G modems are much more modern and efficient, which makes they heat up less when you use data outdoors. In a more humble range mobile, the processor has to work harder and for longer to do the same. That usually translates into more heat and a higher battery consumption. Keyboard and system accuracy and speed Although it may seem silly to you, the keyboard is one of the mobile elements that we use the most on a daily basis. High-end processors have a minimum touch response latency. This means that the letters appear on the screen at the exact moment your fingers touch the glass. Plus, AI text prediction is instant and learns from you in real time without slowing down the system. On mobile phones with lower-end processors, there is a very slight delay (which is known as input lag). On some slow phones, when typing very quickly, there may be small pauses or jumps in the keyboard response. Although it is a difference of milliseconds, your brain notices it and it becomes more tiring to your eyes and mind. Photo processing Nowadays, it could be said that in mobile cameras, the software weighs a lot, but the optics, the sensor and the processing continue to be decisive. If you take a photo in night mode or a portrait with blurthe mobile processor is what makes the difference in results. On phones with high-end SoC, when you take the photo, you can instantly see it processed in the gallery, with the HDR applied and noise removed. On the other hand, on a mobile phone with a more humble SoC, you will see a charging or “processing” icon for a couple of seconds. Furthermore, in these phones, the processing is usually less sophisticated and the result may show more noise or less detail in shadows, since the chip does not have the power to “understand” the image as quickly. Using generative AI and video editing We are in 2026 and the AI It is already in almost (if not all) places: from deleting objects from a photo to summarizing an audio or translating a live call. In many high-end mobile phones, these tasks can run locally with the help of the NPU (Neural Processing Unit) because not all AI functions are always processed locally. In some mobile phones with a less powerful chip, certain functions are supported in the cloud. This translates to if you don’t have good coveragethe function will not work or will be desperately slow. With all this, you are surely wondering if Whether or not it is worth the investment in a mobile phone with a powerful processor and high-end. If you are looking for a device that will last you three or four years, the high-end SoC ensures that the smartphone does not become slow with software updates. Keep in mind that the power of a mobile phone is not just for playing; It’s that kind of gear that makes technology invisible and that the device simply responds to your wishes without you having to wait for it. Some mobile phones with high-end processors XIAOMI 17 Ultra – 16+512GB Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Apple iPhone 17 Pro 256GB with A19 Pro chip The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Mobile phones with more humble processors that may interest you realme 16 Pro 5G Smartphone, 8GB+256GB The price could vary. We earn commission from these links XIAOMI REDMI 15 – 8+256GB Smartphone, Snapdragon 685 The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Yúbal Fernández (Xataka), Ricardo Aguilar (Xataka), Álex Alcolea (Xataka) and Xiaomi In Xataka | The best mobile phones, we have tested them and here are their analyzes In Xataka | Best wireless headphones. Which one to buy and 21 models from 15 euros to 470 euros

Oppo Find X9 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra, two titans in photography with many differences in their cameras

by

What do you base on when buying a mobile phone? Many people do it prioritizing the photographic section and currently there are proposals as attractive as the Oppo Find X9 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra. But… which is better? In this article we are going to put them face to face to clarify some doubts. Oppo Find X9 Ultra (with photo kit) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Vivo X300 Ultra (with photo kit) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links The differences between the Oppo Find X9 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra Camera settings To be clear from the beginning, we are going to review the camera configuration on both phones. Although it is not the big claim, we will also mention the front camera in case it is important to you. Oppo Find X9 Ultra 50 MP front camera; f/2.4. Rear camera module: 200 MP main sensor, f/1.5. 200 MP 3x telephoto, f/2.2. 50 MP 10x telephoto, f/3.5. 50 MP wide angle, f/2.0, 123º FOV. Vivo X300 Ultra 50 MP front camera, f/2.45. Rear camera module: 200 MP main sensor, f/1.85. 200 MP telephoto, f/2.67. 50 MP wide angle, f/2.0, FOV 123.4º. main sensor Both the Oppo Find X9 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra have a 200 megapixel (MP) sensor. Is it a good number? Of course, since it represents the information that the camera can capture in a photo. If it is larger, as is the case, the sharpness will be better and it will be less blurry when enlarged. In any case, the Vivo’s main sensor offers a 35mm equivalent focal length (instead of the typical 23-24mm wide angle), while the Oppo does use a more angular focal length. In both cases we also find a fairly large main sensor with a size of 1/1.12 inches. The size has a lot to do with the ambient light it is able to collect. In other words, imagine that the sensors are like windows, the larger they are, the more light they will let in. In practice, it improves image quality in difficult conditions, generating a more natural background blur, which is usually known as the bokeh. The opening is different in both cases. The Oppo Find X9 Ultra opts for an aperture of f/1.5 while the Vivo And this… what does it mean? The smaller the f/number, the larger the actual aperture of the lens: f/1.5 lets in more light than f/1.85. Oppo’s mobile is physically capable of capturing more light, making it ideal for taking photos in dark environments. Finally, optical stabilization (OIS) is present in both phones. OIS is a system that physically compensates for hand movements by moving the sensor or the optical elements of the lens. Zoom and Telephoto The Oppo Find X9 Ultra incorporates a system with two telephoto lenseswhich means that it has two lenses capable of capturing images at a great distance. And it does so without resorting to a digital system that usually achieves worse results. The first 200 MP telephoto lens includes three magnifications (3x) and f/2.2 aperture, thus offering good quality in, for example, objects or people that are not excessively far away. The second telephoto lens is 50 MP and includes 10x magnification (x10) with f/3.5 aperture, so its use is aimed at very distant distances. In addition, its aperture is smaller (less light enters), which can affect poorly lit scenes. Instead, the Vivo X300 Ultra comes with a single 200 MP telephoto lens with 3.7x magnification (3.7x) and f/2.67 aperture. This means that its sensor offers very good quality at medium distances, especially in less illuminated environments. In addition, it should be added that this mobile phone has ZEISS certification, a technology that corrects color and reduces flare to generate more realistic photographs. The ultra wide angle camera Both the Oppo Find X9 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra use a sensor 50 MP ultra wide angle with f/2.0 aperture. The difference between the two is minimal: 123° versus 123.4°, which in practice is imperceptible. What might it be interesting for? For photos with landscapes in the background. Other sensors Although they may seem the least relevant, it is worth mentioning that both phones come with an additional sensor. 3.2 MP monochrome sensor with f/2.4 aperture for the Oppo Find X9 Ultra, a camera that helps better capture contrasts and shadows. Additional 5 MP sensor with f/2.0 aperture for the Vivo X300 Ultra, a camera that helps to have better focus. The accessories Both phones are compatible with their respective photographic accessories. Oppo Find Vivo Additionally, it includes a grip and a tripod adapter. In summary: In any case, we are faced with two very good mobile phones in their photographic section. We are going to comment on the key points of each mobile phone without taking into account its accessories, which are optional. 👉 Choose Oppo Find X9 Ultra if: You are looking for the best main sensor. It is one of the cameras with the smallest aperture (f/1.5) currently, which offers very good results in darker environments. You are looking to take daytime photographs with high lighting using the telephoto lens with higher magnifications, since it far exceeds (x10) the Vivo X300 Ultra (3.7x). 👉 Choose Vivo X300 Ultra if: You are looking for the clean result that the ZEISS lens offers. You are looking to take photographs at a great distance, capturing the lighting well at sunset. Technical sheet with the main differences between the Oppo Find X9 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra oppo find x9 ultra vivo x300 ultra SCREEN 6.82-inch AMOLED panel QHD+ resolution 144Hz frequency HBM brightness of 1,800 nits 3,600 nits peak 6.82 inch AMOLED QHD+ resolution (3,168 x 1,440 pixels) Refresh rate: 144 Hz 510 DPI Format: 19.8:9 Screen/front ratio: 94.49% HBM brightness: 1,800 nits Local maximum brightness: 4,500 nits PROCESSOR Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 RAM 12GB 16GB LPDDR5x … Read more

Is the AirTag 2 worth buying? Key differences from the first generation of Apple

by

Now that Apple has launched the new AirTag 2it is good to ask yourself if it is really worth buying it or staying in the first generation. Therefore, in this article we are going to review the key differences between AirTag and AirTag 2. AirTag 2 design and precision AirTag (left) and AirTag 2 (right). Broadly speaking, the design of the AirTag 2 is the same as the first generation AirTag, although there is a small difference that allows us to differentiate them when purchasing them: the silkscreen on the AirTag is in lower casewhile on the AirTag 2 it is capitalized. But if there is a significant change between both generations, it is related to the search, especially in precision. Specifically, the new generation offers a elderly precisionwhich means that it can be found from a greater distance (50% more). Additionally, Apple Watch support is added. There is also a increase in sound volume that we can reproduce to locate it quickly. Two very similar prices Although initially the first generation AirTag was launched at an official price of 35 euros, over time it has risen to reach 39 euros. However, some supplier stores tend to keep it on sale for long periods of time, as is the case with Amazon, which right now has it as 30.99 euros (one unit) or by 89.99 euros (four units). The price could vary. We earn commission from these links On the other hand, the AirTag 2 is not too far from what we currently see in the first generation, since it has officially been launched at a price of 35 euros (one unit) or 119 euros (four units), something that is attractive if we want to have the improvements of the AirTag 2 for a price similar to that of the AirTag, at least if we buy a single unit. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Is it worth it? To assess whether it is really worth buying the AirTag 2, we can open three fronts. The first is if it is our first Apple locatorand in this case we may be interested in betting on the new, with the improvements that this entails, for a price very similar to that of the first generation. The second front is If we already have an AirTag. In this case, the differences really are not so great as to justify making the jump to the new generation, especially if the locator works perfectly. Finally, it may also be the case that you want buy the pack of four AirTag or AirTag 2. The new generation is also available in this pack at an official price of 119 eurosso if you want to have several Apple locators, it is worth opting for the previous generation pack, since its price is currently 89.99 euros. You may also be interested in these other locators SATECHI FindAll Key Finder with Apple Find My, Wireless Charging, Forgotten Alert with Powerful Sound, GPS Keychain Key Locator for iPhone 17 16 15 Series, iPad, Mac and More – Black The price could vary. We earn commission from these links SATECHI FindAll Air Tag Card GPS for Wallets with Apple Find My, Forgotten Alert, Powerful Sound, Wireless Charging, Lightweight GPS Card, Wallet Locator for iPhone, iPad, Mac – Black The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Anna MartiApple In Xataka | The best Airtag for Android. Which one to buy? Tips and recommendations In Xataka | Apple AirTag, Tile, Samsung SmartTag and more: Bluetooth locator buying guide with recommendations and differences

There is a Europe that is suffocating to pay for housing and another that lives in peace. And this map shows the differences

by

Beyond the political ups and downs, corruption, unemployment, the war in Ukraine, or the (increasingly) convulsive scenario of international geopolitics, from time to time The CIS reminds us that there is a much more everyday problem that keeps us Spaniards up at night: access to housing. At the end of 2025 39.9% of those surveyed by the organization pointed out housing as “the main problem” facing the country. And it is normal if you take into account the mismatch between supply and demand, the pressure that carries out tourist rentals and (above all) the sharp rise in prices of recent years. Every time we talk about the residential market, however, the same question arises: beyond the exact cost of the square meter (m2), calculated by the General Council of Notaries, the executive or portals like IdealisticHow “unaffordable” is accommodation in Spain? What economic effort does it require from families? Is it more or less than what other European households must assume? Getting perspective Type of housing (in m2) available spending 40% of monthly income. ESPON, the program who is dedicated to studying cohesion of the EU, has published a series of maps that help answer these questions in a quick, direct and, above all, visual way. To prepare them, two parameters have been basically set: the prices of the real estate market for sales and rentals and the income data published by Eurostat. Everything divided by regions. By crossing them the organism has been able to carry out two calculations. The first is to estimate what type of housing (in m2) a person who allocates 40% of their income to this purpose can rent in each EU region. The second is what percentage of their rent that same tenant should dedicate if they wanted a 100 m2 house. Percentage of monthly income necessary to rent a 100 m2 home. ESPON does not stop there. He has also transferred those same questions to the buying and selling market residential. That is, what type of housing could a person willing to invest 40% of their annual income for an entire decade afford? And how many years would you have to endure that same budgetary effort if you wanted to buy a 100 m2 apartment? In both cases the maps are similar and they leave behind a series of conclusions, such as the profound differences that exist within the same country. “Regions containing and surrounding capital cities such as Paris, Berlin, Lisbon and Madrid tend to be less affordable compared to the rest of the nation. Additionally, coastal regions tend to be less affordable, which is also clearly seen in the Netherlands and Germany, Portugal, Spain and France.” Available housing (m2) investing 40% of the income for 10 years. Years necessary to buy a 100 m2 home investing 40% of the income. For example, while a Madrid resident willing to invest 40% of his annual income in housing would need between 20 and 25 years To pay for a 100 m2 house, a resident of the province of Teruel would need at most ten years of effort. In Barcelona it would need around 20-25 years while on the other side of the peninsula, in Pontevedra, between 15 and 20 years would be enough. The worst part in Spain is Malaga, the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands, where ESPON calculates that on average a buyer would need to invest 40% of their annual income for more than three and a half decades. A very similar effort would have to be endured by the inhabitants of the Algarve, Setúbal, part of the Paris area, Monaco, Corsica or different points spread across Eastern Europe, where ESPON itself recognizes that “quite unaffordable” areas are concentrated. If we talk about the rental market, the panorama It’s not very different. A Madrid resident who would like to rent a 100 m2 apartment would need to dedicate (on average) between 80 and 90% of their income to it. The situation is worse in coastal points, such as Barcelona, ​​Huelva, Malaga and Eastern European regions. In the provinces of Zamora or Huesca they would be enough between 30 and 40%which is closer to the debt ceiling level than recommend assuming the experts. Images | Quique Olivar (Unsplash) and ESPON In Xataka | It is not a country for Spaniards: Madrid and Catalonia are losing national population while gaining foreign population

what it is, characteristics of this artificial intelligence model and differences with Gemini and ChatGPT

by

Let’s explain to you what is Kimi K2 Thinkingthe latest model of the company artificial intelligence Kimi AI. It is an AI that has made a name for itself today due to its open nature and for having managed to compete directly against GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro and other high-end models. We are going to start the article by explaining what Kimi K2 is and the characteristics that make this artificial intelligence model different. Then, we will finish by telling you the main differences with respect to the most popular models on the market. What is Kimi K2 Thinking Kimi K2 Thinking is the latest version of Kimi, a Chinese artificial intelligence model created by Moonshot companyfrom Alibaba. Since the names are the same, you can clarify yourself by thinking that Kimi is the company’s AI, like ChatGPTand that this AI has different models that are being launched, such as the case of GPT-5 in the case of OpenAI. Kimi K2 was launched in July, and stood out for having a gigantic size of 10,000 million parameters. Now there is a new version called Kimi K2 Thinkingwhose number of active parameters amounts to 32,000. According to its creators, this allows the AI ​​to maintain stable use of agentic tools over 200 to 300 sequential calls. And what does all this talk mean? As you know, we are entering the era of AI agentswhich are automations with which an artificial intelligence can carry out different actions autonomously. This allows the AI ​​to even make decisions for you, from asking it to make your purchase to preparing a vacation package for you and taking care of the reservations. It is also something that at the business level is going to have even more uses. Therefore, the more ability an AI has to perform a large number of actions without making mistakes, the more valuable and powerful it is. Features of Kimi K2 Thinking The most important feature of Kimi K2 Thinking is that it is an open model. The models of companies like OpenAI, Google or Anthropic are closed, which means that their source code is kept under lock and key, only these companies know how it works inside. Meanwhile, K2 Thinking is open source, which means that anyone can know how it works inside looking your Githubits features, and you can even adapt it for free. What’s more, you can install it locally at no cost, although the computer needed for this is too powerful for ordinary mortals, but “distilled” versions, lowered or trimmed, can be released so that people can use them locally. In this aspect it is like DeepSeek, another open AI that already surprised a few months ago for approaching the power of non-open models such as Gemini or ChatGPT. In the case of Kimi K2 Thinking, according to the test benches has managed to surpass GPT-5something that until recently was unthinkable. We are facing a Mixture-of-Experts architecture model (MoE), which means that it is made up of several experts (subnetworks or specialized modules), and that not everything is activated at once, but only the parts of the model necessary to answer what you ask or perform the task that you have asked. It should also be said that it is multilingual, and can be used in other languages ​​although it focuses on Chinese, and that it can process many types of file formats. Also searches in real time to offer you the most up-to-date information, and is multimodal, being able to interpret text, images, code or a combination of these. Kimi K2 Thinking can be used as a conversational char answering questions and maintaining long context while following complex threads. But it can also interpret images, or a combination of mixed inputs such as images with text and with code. In addition to this, it can generate programming code, analyze long documents thanks to its large context window and extract information to answer questions about the content or give you a summary. Additionally, you can create automations or agents. Differences with ChatGPT or Gemini As we have told you above, the main difference of Kimi is its open concept. While ChatGPT and Gemini are proprietary models, Kimi allows access to the community so they can see its code. Several benchmarks have shown that Kimi K2 Thinking outperforms GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking) in search and agentic browsing in the browser, in text-only operation, and in information collection. The only thing in which it still does not surpass these models is in the creation of code. In the use of agentic tools, benchmarks or test benches have shown that Kimi K2 Thinking is positioned as a leading AI model. Besides, Kimi is a cheaper model for several things. First, training the model cost $4.6 million, according to indicate on CNBC, a ridiculous figure considering that training proprietary models like GPT-5 It cost about 500 million dollars according to estimates. It’s also cheaper to use the Kimi K2 Thinking API. The API is like the entry key that allows other applications to connect to this AI to work with it. The price of K2 Thinking is $0.6 per million tokens in and $2.5 per million tokens out. GPT-5 Chat costs $1.25/10 respectively, and Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3/15 respectively. For the average user, the operation is the same.. You have the website kimi.comwhere after registering for free you can use the Kimi K1.5 and K2 models. However, If you want to use Kimi K2 Thinking you will have to pay with their subscriptions of 19 or 30 dollars. At least, this is if you want to use the full version on the official website, without having to install anything. In Xataka Basics | The best prompts to save hours of work and do your tasks with ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot or other artificial intelligence

what is this subscription, features and differences with ChatGPT Plus

by

Let’s tell you what are the features of ChatGPT Gothe new subscription of ChatGPT available in Spain. It is a cheaper alternative that gives you access to some advanced functions, but with which you will not be able to use some other extra functions such as creating videos. It is a new subscription that is now beginning to arrive in our country. Still, it is a subscription to consider if you do not want to pay as much for greater access to GPT-5 or advanced imaging, since It costs 10 euros a month. We are going to tell you its characteristics and the main differences with other subscriptions. What is ChatGPT Go ChatGPT Go is the cheapest subscription plan to access advanced features of the artificial intelligence from OpenAI. This is an intermediate plan between the little that the free version offers with its numerous limits, and what the Plus plan offers, which is the “normal” AI plan. Being in this middle place, ChatGPT Go offers expanded access to GPT-5 and any new versions of the artificial intelligence model that come out in the future. It also widens file upload margins and speeds up image creation. But it is missing some things that the Plus version does have, as we will tell you later. So, it becomes an option for those who prefer to pay less and have access to fewer functions that ChatGPT offers. It has a price of 9.99 euros per monthless than half of the 23 euros per month that the Plus version costs, being a more popular price for common users. Features of ChatGPT Go vs. Plus Feature Free ChatGPt chatgpt go ChatGPt plus chatgpt pro Price €0/month €9.99/month €23/month €229/month access to gpt-5 Access to GPT-5 Expanded access for GPT-5 GPT-5 with advanced reasoning GPT-5 with professional reasoning Messages and uploads Limited file uploads Expanded messages and uploads Expanded messages and uploads Unlimited messages and uploads Images Limited and slow imaging Expanded and faster imaging Expanded and faster imaging Unlimited and faster image generation Memory Limited memory and context Expanded memory and context Expanded memory and context Maximum memory and context Deep investigation Limited depth research Limited depth research Expanded in-depth investigation, and agent mode Maximum in-depth investigation and agent mode Projects, tasks, gpts No access Custom Projects, Tasks, and GPT Custom Projects, Tasks, and GPT Expanded Custom Projects, Tasks, and GPT sora No access No access Video generation with Sora Video generation with extended Sora codex agent No access No access With Codex agent With expanded Codex agent Video preview No access No access No access New Feature Research Preview As you can see, the ChatGPT Go version has expanded access to GPT-5, but without advanced reasoning of the plus version. Its in-depth research is limited as in the free version, although hopefully not as much, and it gives you access to the GPTs personalized, and the creation of projects and tasks. ChatGPT Go it doesn’t give you access to Sora and its video creation, nor to the Codex programming agent. It shares expanded memory and context, better image generation, and more file uploads with the Plus version, although OpenAI does not specify the differences that possibly there is. The Plus version is still the standard plan that gives you access to the main features of ChatGPT, from video creation to greater capabilities and advanced reasoning in GPT-5. There is a higher subscription, ChatGPT Pro, but its price is still so high that it is not worth it unless you use AI professionally and always need the highest limits. But hey, at least the Go version gives you a more reasonably priced gateway to features that go beyond the limitations of the free version. This is good news for those who want to use ChatGPT on a daily basis and take advantage of various functions, but without needing it so much as to pay 23 euros per month. In Xataka Basics | Get the most out of GPT-5: 11 features and tricks to get the most out of ChatGPT’s new features

How to know the differences in characteristics, battery and specifications

by

Let’s explain How can you compare the iPhone To see the differences between different models. You have several alternatives to do it, but we are going to tell you the three fastest and most effective. The idea is that if you have an iPhone and want to buy a new model you can know the differences. It can also serve you When you are doubting between two different modelsand thus be able to know the main differences that you will find among them. Use the Apple comparator Apple has its own comparator in which you can choose two concrete iPhone models and know what are the main differences between them. To enter the comparator, go to the web Apple.com/es/iphone/compare. Once you enter the web, you will go to a comparator where you can Add up to three iPhone models. For example, if you have one you can add it first, and then you can add the two models you are considering. And if you don’t have an iPhone and you just want to compare between models, you can also choose up to three. Once the models are chosen, they will be deployed The phones of the mobiles you have selected. These chips will go with the data along, so you can compare their components and their characteristics. You can use artificial intelligence Another ally is the artificial intelligenceto whom you can make a request to make you a general comparison or some specific specification. Here, you can use a prompt like this: “Make me a comparison of the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro. The important thing when manufacturing the PROMPT is to mention whether you want to compare any specific aspect (in the case of the example the battery) or general. You must also indicate the models. Finally, it is vital that You ask you to look for the latest available dataespecially if you are going to look for a model that has been announced recently and that they cannot have in their memory base. You have no doubt Ask you to review the information Once I give it to you to make sure you are looking for the latest data. Do not lose sight of Xataka And I could not finish this article without recommending that you look for information about the iPhone you want in Xataka. In this house we take care of offering you the most complete chips, as well as contact shots, analysis after a month of use and comparative of key points. For example, you already have the chips of the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 pro maxin addition to that of iPhone 17 and iPhone Air. And in the next few days we will continue to make comparisons, contact and informing you about every detail. In Xataka | If you buy an iPhone Air, you will not be able to use a physical sim: Apple forces its users to go to ESIM

differences, advantages and disadvantages of both alternatives

by

Let’s get A comparison between ESIM and SIM cards. The esim They are the successors of the SIM cards, the last step in the evolution of these, so that after getting smaller and smaller over the years, now they disappear. The ESIM are not new, they have been among us, increasingly present, but it seems that we are at the gates of the final jump in which mobiles will bet exclusively for them. This change is important, because as all technology electronic sims have their advantages, but also several disadvantages that you should know. Our intention with this article is that if you ever have to choose the same mobile model with normal Sim or ESIM, or if you are between two models each with one of these technologies, you know to what extent one or the other can affect your experience of use. Differences between ESIM and physical sim A SIM is that little card that gives you your mobile operator to put it in your device, so that it can make calls and connect to the Internet. The card has The data that allow you to access your phone numberand also the configuration to connect to the mobile internet that you have hired with the operator. Since its creation in 1991, SIMs have evolved and becoming smaller and smaller. First we pass from the Great Sim to the Minisim, and from there to the Nanosim that we have today in most mobile phones. The last step is that the card is no longer physical and that come integrated into the mobile itselfwhich is precisely the philosophy of the ESIM. The ESIM is A chip that carries the mobile phone itselfand that you will be able to configure to install the data that the SIM card would normally have. Thus, your mobile will not need to use a module to enter the physical card, and this space can save it to use it in other things, such as increasing battery capacity or putting other extra chips. Therefore, the physical sim gives you the operator with the necessary data to access the Internet that you have hired with it and make calls, while the ESIM is on your mobile and you install those same data. The difference is that one is a physical support and another a chip inside the mobilewhere you install your operator’s data. Advantages and Disadvantages of ESIM ESIM have some notable advantages about conventional SIMs that should be taken into account. For a start, You don’t need to worry about the status of a cardyou don’t have to worry about losing it or when changing it, you fall or break you. Acting an ESIM to put your operator’s codes is as simple as scanning a QR code or installing a file that they send you by email. This means that You no longer have to wait for a SIM to be sent by mail If you change your operator or hire a new line, because everything can be done online. In addition, a mobile with this technology Allows you to store several ESIM card profiles. This means that you can have several contracted lines, even more than 10, and then always choose one or two to be actively using. But these can change them whenever you want, that is, you have greater flexibility, something useful for example when you hire a rate to travel abroad. In addition to this, there are also advantages such as greater securitysince copying the data of an ESIM is not as easy as those of a SIM, you cannot simply take a phone, open the card tray and extract it. Everything is inside the device. The manufacturers also have some advantages that can repecut in advantages for you. For example, there may be greater security if the mobile gets wet by not having an extra slot. And removing the module of the slot, a space is saved that can make The same mobile model only with ESIM has more battery capacity That the same version with conventional sim slot, although also has SIM. ESIM also have disadvantages But ESIM also have some disadvantagessome things that conventional sim cards can do better. While mobile phones live with both technologies, nothing will happen, you can choose which one to use, but everything seems to indicate that the trend will be completely eliminating the SIMs to introduce only the ESIM, that is, it should be taken into account how bad it can also have. For a start, Changing mobile can be somewhat more cumbersome. Just as making a migration is easy, changing mobile phones reusing your ESIM is not as easy as taking your card from one device and putting it in the other. There are some manufacturers that have data migration processes from one device to another that include this data, something that should be with modern android and iPhone. When you change mobile using the same operating system, this is usually easy, since modern android and iPhone have data migration systems that usually include ESIM. But when you change the manufacturer or operating system, there may be some extra steps, and you will even have to ask for help from your operator. For example, you may need to be issued a new QR or duplicate installation file, and here each operator has its policy, there may be cases where you have to pay to have another duplicate. This can be a special problem in other cases, such as when you want to make the equivalent to simply pass the card from one mobile to another for a moment or a few days, or then return it to the previous one. Therefore, A SIM card has greater flexibility When making changes between devices. And also greater compatibility, since if you go to ESIM and want to continue using them, you will always need to have a mobile that supports this technology, although today there should be no problems. In Xataka Basics | … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.