absolutely

The Trump Mobile T1 wanted to be the quintessential American mobile. It has turned out to be an absolutely Chinese mobile

by

Donald Trump was determined that Apple will build the iPhone in the United States and he managed to get them to take steps in that direction, but it soon became clear that the 100% American iPhone was a utopia. Things didn’t go as planned, so he did something very Trump: announce its own smartphone made in the USA. After almost a year since its announcement, the Trump Mobile T1 is already has reached the hands of several analysts and the conclusion is that nothing American. The mobile phone is an old acquaintance and It is mostly made in China. An HTC U24 Pro with a coat of paint It is the summary of what they have discovered after analyzing it in detail in iFixit. The mobile phone that promised to be 100% manufactured in the United States is an almost carbon copy of the HTC U24 Prowith the main difference that its back cover is gold and has the American flag engraved with the text ‘Trump Mobile’. The differences come down to color, the camera module and little else There are other cosmetic changes, such as the speaker grill having a different pattern and the camera module having a different design, with an oval piece encompassing the three lenses (which by the way is completely misaligned in the photos on the official website). At the specifications level, the only change is that the battery is a little larger than in the original HTC, but it loses the 60W fast charge and is left with only 30W. At the internal design level, iFixit says that matches point by point with the original HTC model: same component layout, same motherboard and same screen. In terms of specifications, the HTC U24 Pro was launched in summer 2024, so it does not have the most cutting-edge features. We are talking about a Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chip, 12GB of RAM, 512GB of capacity and a 6.78-inch screen (although the Trump Mobile website says it is 6.8 inches). Made in China, assembled in the USA (or almost) First of all, it should be noted that the mobile was announced as “designed and built in the United States”, but In January of this year they lowered the promise by others like “designed with American values ​​in mind” or “proudly assembled in the USA.” This already gave clues of what was to come and the iFixit breakdown confirms it: it is very little American. In 2017, HTC sold a large part of its smartphone division to Googleabandoning frontline manufacturing. Since then, HTC has turned to Chinese ODMs to be able to manufacture and assemble its phones. Although they have not confirmed it directly, according to The Verge investigation Everything indicates that the HTC U24 Pro is manufactured in Guangdong Yuanchang Electronics, located in (surprise) Guangdong, China. According to Trump Mobile, the device is assembled in Miami, Florida. Specifically, they say the phone is assembled from “about ten pieces,” which is just enough for the FTC to allow them to use the label. ‘assembled in the USA’. To achieve ‘made in USA’ status that Trump so desired, the FCT is much stricter and requires that “all significant processing” and “all or substantially all” components be manufactured in the United States. Image | Xataka with Magnific In Xataka | In its quest to manufacture the iPhone at home, the US has achieved something historic: that the majority of its smartphones come from India

In 2023 we detect an absolutely anomalous explosion at the edge of the Universe. Now we know what happened

by

In 2023, the Zwicky Transient Facility, an astronomical consortium led by Caltech, detected a curious signal on the outskirts of a dwarf galaxy 1.3 billion light years away. At first everything seemed to indicate that it was the result of a type II supernova explosion. It’s always interesting to spot one, but it’s not unusual. However, as soon as they tried to classify it a little better, they realized that it had many qualities that did not fit within the definition of this phenomenon. Investigating, they discovered that, in reality, the signal corresponds to one of the rarest explosions that occur in the Universe: a pairwise instability supernova. A special supernova. Pairwise instability supernovae are supernova explosions that occur when the original star is very massive and is in an environment with low metallicity. Furthermore, there is another big difference. After a typical supernova explosion, either a neutron star or a black hole usually forms. In this case, however, it can be said that the stars completely self-destruct, without leaving any remnants. It is a very rare phenomenon, very difficult to detect. However, the authors of the study that has just been published hope, with what they have learned from this finding, to locate other similar events based on the data obtained with the Vera Rubin Observatory. The brightness curve that didn’t add up. Normally, when a normal supernova explosion occurs, the brightness curve is plateau-shaped. On the other hand, in this event, named SN 2023vbw, after an initial cooling, a constant increase in brightness was observed until reaching a very bright peak around 190 days. Then, until day 230, the brightness began to decrease and finally stabilized on a plateau. Other data that did not add up. The total irradiation energy of this phenomenon was 3× 1050 Ergs, a figure that is more than 10 times higher than that of a type II supernova. Furthermore, during ascent, the explosion stabilized at a nearly constant temperature while its outer shell continued to expand. For this to occur there must be a large and continuous internal heating source, which does not happen with a type II supernova. On the other hand, as the supernova faded, the emissions that were detected had nothing to do with those normal for a conventional supernova. Finally, the kinetic energy was 60 to 130 times greater than the maximum energy that an ordinary supernova can produce. Two very different supernovae. Normally, a very massive star is subject to two very powerful forces. On the one hand, that of gravity, which compresses it inward. On the other hand, that of radiation, which pushes outwards. Both forces remain in balance. However, when the star runs out of fuel to stay “on,” the radiation pressure decreases, so gravity pushes strongly inward. As a result, the star collapses, leading to a supernova explosion. Behind it a black hole or a neutron star can form. If the star is very massive and is also located in an environment with low metallicity, the process is slightly different. To begin with, such high temperatures are reached in its core that enough energy is generated for the photons to transform into an electron-positron pair. This phenomenon eliminates the pressure exerted by radiation much more suddenly, so that the force exerted by gravity, which is immense, causes the collapse of the star and, later, a very violent explosion. So violent that everything is destroyed, there is no remnant left. The location of SN 2023vbw (magenta circle) on the outskirts of its dwarf host galaxy (green circle). The role of metallicity. The low metallicity of the environment helps because metals normally absorb the radiation coming out of the star, favoring the expulsion of matter outward. If there are few metals, less matter will be extracted from the star and the greater its mass. A blue supergiant in an environment with very low metallicity. The light curves that were detected seem to correspond to a blue supergiant as a starting point. This very massive star, which can be caused by the merger of two stars in a binary system, can give rise to a type II supernova. However, we have already seen that the characteristics do not add up. However, the scientists who analyzed the results found the clue they were missing. That the explosion had occurred in an environment with very low metallicity. It corresponded approximately to a tenth of that of the Sun. It is the missing ingredient for a pairwise instability supernova to occur. A very rare phenomenon. This phenomenon is one of the rarest explosions that occur in the Universe. There are many very massive stars, but in general they are in very metal-rich environments, so a pairwise instability supernova cannot occur. Therefore, this discovery is very exciting. Although it may soon become more common. And not only because of the Vera Rubin Observatory that we have already mentioned. It is also expected that the brand new Nancy Grace Roman from NASA can detect more phenomena of this type when you start doing your work. Until then, detecting stars self-destructing in this way will remain even more difficult than finding a needle in a haystack. Image | Supernova remnant on cover. Credit: NASA/CXC/Rutgers/G.Cassam-Chenaï, J.Hughes et al.; Radio: NRAO/AUI/NSF/GBT/VLA/Dyer, Maddalena & Cornwell; Optical: Middlebury College/F.Winkler, NOAO/AURA/NSF/CTIO Schmidt & DSS | Hiramatsu et al. In Xataka | Caltech has published the “strongest evidence yet” that an unknown planet exists in the solar system

Mistral has a new AI model. The good news is that it is absolutely European; the bad one, which is absolutely mediocre

by

The French startup Mistral has just launched Mistral Medium 3.5an open-weight AI model that is the great European exponent in an industry absolutely dominated by China—which competes directly with this type of projects—and by the US. And if this is the best they can do, it seems Europe has a problem. Mediocre. This is a “dense” model with 128 billion parameters and a context window of 256,000 tokens. While models with Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture only activate a subset of the total parameters to achieve enviable efficiency and capacity, Mistral activates them all. That makes it much less efficient, but theoretically it should make its performance promising. And that’s the problem. Which it is not. Benchmarks. Pedro Domingos, professor of deep learning at the University of Washington, he expressed it very well: “Mainstream AI companies brag about how their model is much better in benchmarks. Soo Mistral brags about how their model is much worse.” It is true that the models with which it is compared are larger in total number of parameters, but as we will see later, even taking that into account, they are cheaper and theoretically more efficient thanks to the use of that MoE architecture in many of them. The model, however, unifies the previous catalog and follows the market trend of being able to establish the desired level of reasoning (reasoning_effort) as a parameter. Bad results. And he is somewhat right: Mistral does not seem to have problems showing the results of various benchmarks in which it performs poorly, but it also performs poorly with models that are by no means the most recent or powerful on the market. Thus, it is compared with Claude Sonnet 4.5/4.6, with Kimi K2.5, with GLM-5.1 or with Qwen 3.5 397B. In almost all cases (except GLM 5.1) there are already more recent and powerful versions of all of them. Not so far from local models. In fact Medium 3.5 scored 77.6% in SWE-Bench Verified, a programming test in which Qwen3.6-27b It reaches 72.4% with a fundamental difference: you can run it “for free” (with the appropriate hardware, and you paying the electricity bill) with a relatively affordable machine. More expensive (and somewhat more restrictive). If we use it via API, Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.5 per million output tokens. GLM-5.1 costs 1.4/4.4 respectively, and Kimi K2.5 costs 0.5/2.8 respectively. Its recent successor, Kimi K2.6, costs 0.95/4, and it is significantly better than Mistral being cheaper. There is a curious fact: Mistral uses a “modified MIT license” instead of the traditional Apache 2.0, and indicates that this model can be used commercially or non-commercially except for “high-income” companies. Chasing Anthropic. In addition to the model itself, the company has presented the so-called remote scheduling agents using Mistral Vibe CLI to, for example, send pull requests to GitHub in an automated way. It also has the so-called “Work Mode” in LeChat, allowing multi-step tasks to be managed autonomously. These are tools clearly intended to strengthen Mistral’s role as a base for scheduling agents, which is the path that has worked fantastically for Anthropic. Your advantage: being European. The only great strength of this model is that it has been developed by a European startup, and that gives it clear visibility at a time when many EU countries they talk about digital sovereignty. It is the only Western model that seems to want to compete with China in the field of open weight models, which is good news, but the truth is that in terms of performance it does not seem that the Mistral Medium 3.5 is going to perform competitively. The geopolitical security network. That, together with the fact that it costs more than its competitors, makes the decision to use it difficult unless for those who prioritize clearly that European origin. That is Mistral’s ace in the hole, and they are taking advantage of perfectly. The company has recently obtained financing to create data centers in Europe, and is nourished and fed by this new obsession with minimize dependency of North American Big Tech. In Xataka | The CEO of Mistral sends a message to Europe: the end of being the technological vassal of the United States

Apple has broken an all-time sales record with the MacBook Neo in its first week. The surprise is absolutely zero

by

Tim Cook himself confirmed it a few days ago in X. And Apple has managed to beat its own record with the help of MacBook Neo In terms of sales, it is the best launch of a Mac for new users in its entire history. The theme is striking to say the least, although it is little surprising considering that it is a significantly cheaper product than the rest of the equipment offered by the brand. Why does it matter? Apple has dominated the premium laptop market for decades, but it has always had a clear ceiling: its entry price. He MacBook Air with M5 part of the 1,199 euros, which leaves out a huge group of Windows PC users, Chromebook or directly without a computer. The launch of the MacBook Neo, at 699 euros (which remains at 599 for students), is Apple’s first serious attempt to conquer that market. And it seems to be working. busy week. On March 11, Apple presented three new computers simultaneously: the MacBook Neo, the MacBook Air with M5 chip and the MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max. It was a pretty dense week for the Mac line. A few days later, Tim Cook published in X that this launch had broken the historical record of new Mac buyers, that is, people who purchased an Apple computer for the first time. Although Cook does not break down the figures or specify which model leads the data, the logic points in one direction. The responsible one. The MacBook Air and MacBook Pro have a consolidated user base that periodically renews their equipment. The MacBook Neo, on the other hand, has no previous installed base: it is a completely new product, designed from the ground up to attract those who have never bought a Mac. With a price approximately half that of the Air, it is a profile that fits exactly with that of a buyer making the jump from Windows or a Chromebook. And it should be noted that the Mac has been on the market for decades, but there is still a huge volume of PC users who have never had one, and the Neo seems destined to change that. Who would imagine that a Mac would sell more if it were at a more competitive price… Demand exceeds supply. Another indicator of the Neo’s impact is that Apple is not being able to meet demand, according to they count from 9to5Mac. During March 20, all MacBook Neo models in Apple’s online store had a delivery date between April 6 and 13, according to the media, which means between two and three weeks of waiting for a product launched just a week ago. Normally it is something that usually happens when a new iPhone arrives, but on Mac it is something much less common. Those with an Apple Store nearby may have better luck, although the assortment varies greatly depending on location and color. The industry was already on alert. The impact of the Neo has not gone unnoticed outside of Apple. According to AppleInsiderWindows PC manufacturers have been surprised by both the price and the features of the new laptop. It is not a device for everyone, but it does seem to be for many: it has the A18 Pro chip (the same as iPhone 16 Pro) that, for office automation and navigation tasks it gives you plentyand it comes in a good assortment of colors, with a value proposition that was unprecedented on Mac and that seems to convince many users. Cover image | Apple In Xataka | Apple is not only being penalized for being late to the AI ​​boom: it is also penalizing itself for allying itself solely with Google

A Xiaomi SU7 has humiliated an entire Ferrari SF90 in an acceleration race. And that means absolutely nothing

by

If in recent days you have wandered through social networks (and something tells me that is very likely) perhaps you have seen a video in which a Xiaomi SU7 Ultra makes a fool of an entire Ferrari SF90 XX Stradale in an acceleration race. “A Ferrari worth a million euros losing against a phone manufacturer” reads the tweet from accounts like that of @kinglinzhui who regularly posts information or videos proselytizing Chinese technology and culture. The tweet, in fact, has also been replicated by high-ranking figures in the State, as the Chinese ambassador to Colombia. In the video you can actually see how The Chinese car passes over the Ferrari. He Xiaomi SU7 Ultra It is the most advanced electric car from the Chinese manufacturer. It has 1,548 HP of power available and is limited to 350 km/h. He Ferrari SF90 XX Stradale It is also the most radical version of one of the most advanced sports cars that Ferrari has launched in recent years. In this case it is a plug-in hybrid with 1,030 HP of power with a V8 engine that generates up to 797 HP of power and is supported by three other electric motors to give the best of itself. Although there are some details to understand why the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is faster, both Twitter accounts have focused on the inevitable: the most emblematic Western firm that puts a million-euro car on the market. (actually it is a limited edition of 790 units sold starting at 770,000 euros) is crushed by an electric supercar from a company that has just been born in the automobile market and that opened reserves for just over 100,000 euros at direct exchange. The problem is that it doesn’t mean much. Or, directly, it doesn’t mean anything. Click on the image to go to the original tweet The problem is the aura How important is technique in the debate? Everything and nothing really. And the first thing to keep in mind is that the comparison does not hold up. An electric car with more than 1,500 HP of power will always be faster in a straight line race than a car with a combustion engine. All its difficulty (and it is not a little, mind you) lies in being able to lower the power to the ground in the most effective way and launch the car forward as quickly as possible. In this case, it doesn’t matter if we are comparing a Ferrari with a Xiaomi or any other high-performance electric car. It is also not the first time we have seen comparisons of this type. And it is that carwow has already demonstrated the potential of the electric car facing a Kia EV6 GT against a Ferrari Purosangue. The power and sound of the naturally aspirated V12 against a general electric sports car. The result was the same again, with the Ferrari crushed. In the case of the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra and the Ferrari SF90 XX Stradale things change a little because those from Maranello have in this case an electrified car on their hands. All in all, although it certifies 0 to 100 km/h in just over two seconds, it is not enough to defeat the Chinese electric car. The problem for Xiaomi is that it sweeps the purely technical section but there is something it cannot offer right now compared to one of Ferrari’s most advanced cars in recent years: aura. When you spend more than 770,000 euros on a Ferrari (as if you were spending a million euros) it is not because you want to buy the fastest car. Or, at least, not only for that. First, you have to understand that the Ferrari SF90 XX Stradale is a circuit car, designed to perform at its best when linking curves. Something in which, of course, Also the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra has proven to be among the best. The case of this Ferrari is special because the “Program XX” It is designed to sell to a very specific group of customers a car that is not approved for the street, that can only be driven on a track. In fact, Ferrari takes the car wherever you want and maintains it when you have it stopped. It is a service typical of a pilot. However, this time, Ferrari has made the necessary adjustments to be able to drive it wherever the client wants. That exclusivity, that treatment of the customer is what a Ferrari SF90 XX Stradale customer buys when they get one of these limited units. The customer of this type of car is not concerned that a Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is faster in a straight line. I would dare say that few even care that it is faster on a track. Building a car brand from scratch has this problem. And it is even more complicated when it comes to an electric car. Chinese brands face a major obstacle. In many cases they are technically better than Westerners but they lack history. My colleague Javier Lacort explains it well in the podcast Infinite Loop. It is no coincidence that Xiaomi partners with Leica on its mobile phones. Nor that TCL has done the same with Sony for its televisions. Building a brand from scratch and having specific recognition as a firm that makes premium products worldwide is very complicated. The Volkswagen Group needed shovelfuls of marketing money for more than two decades to ensure that Audi was perceived as a German premium at the level of Mercedes or BMW. And the higher you aim, the more difficult it is to achieve that recognition. But Xiaomi also has another challenge: creating a story around its electric devices. When we tested the Porsche Macan We said that the car was great, a sporty electric SUV for traveling at extraordinary speed. And yet, it lacks soul. Because that same car previously had a V6 engine that generated sensations that were impossible to replicate by an electric car. It … Read more

The US bans Chinese drones and turns DJI into the new Huawei. It’s an absolutely crazy idea.

by

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) of the United States has decided ban all drones and critical components of these vehicles that have been manufactured in foreign countries. In addition to this, he has vetoed any team of communication and video surveillance from the largest Chinese manufacturers, and there is one name above all others: DJI. It’s another shot in the foot for the Trump administration. what has happened. Does almost a decade that some government officials in the US were asking for a veto on drones manufactured by Chinese companies, and that veto is now official. The FCC decision It will prevent this body from authorizing drones or critical drone components, something that is essential to be able to import them into the United States. The measure clearly affects DJI, which becomes the new Huaweialthough there is another firm, Autel, that will also be greatly impacted by the decision. Both come to form part of the so-called “covered list”. The reason is the usual one: to protect national security. It only affects (for now) future drones. The existing drones They will not be affected for the moment by the veto and their users will be able to continue using them. Stores that had models in their inventory and warehouses will be able to sell them normally, as the FCC’s action focuses specifically on future models. Thus, the decision is not retroactive, but that could change in the future and affect many models. What DJI says. Those responsible for DJI indicate in The Wall Street Journal that the company is prepared to be audited and highlights that independent analyzes have indicated that its products are completely safe. “DJI’s data security concerns are not based on evidence and instead reflect protectionism, contrary to the principles of an open market.” Drone pilots cry out to the sky. There are nearly half a million certified drone pilots in the United States, and in this segment between 70 and 90% of commercial drones used by local governments and hobbyists come from DJI. The measure therefore has an enormous impact on this entire industry in the United States. Many of these pilots are collecting drones and components to mitigate the impact of the measure. bad future. Greg Reverdiau, co-founder of the Pilot Institute in Arizona, conducted a survey in which 8,000 pilots participated. 43% indicated that the veto would be “extremely negative” and “potentially a cause of business closure”, and nearly 85% said they could stay in business for up to two years due to the prospect of not being able to access future DJI equipment and components. As this expert said, “People don’t buy DJI drones because it’s Chinese, they buy it because it’s available, very affordable, and capable.” DJI has no competition. And less, American. Eric Ebert, owner of a construction firm and user of these drones, explained the problem. “I’m American through and through. I drive a Chebrolet truck. But American drones can’t compete.” Ebert has a team of seven drone pilots who monitor wind turbine and solar panel installations. These weeks they have not stopped hoarding DJI drones and components “knowing what was going to come our way in 2026.” Protectionism…One of the companies that will benefit from the measure is Brinc Drones, a Seattle firm that sells them to more than 700 state agencies. Blake Resnick, its founder, explained that “it is impossible to compete with DJI unless you are subsidized by the state.” …and rear doors. In November XTI Aerospace, which makes helicopters, acquired a DJI distributor called Drone Nerds and also Anzu Robotics, which makes drones by licensing technology from DJI. As part of the agreement, the drone component manufacturing firm Unusual Machines invested 25 million. Guess who is a shareholder and board member of Unusual Machines: Donald Trump Jr, President Trump’s son. Image | jonas In Xataka | China conquered us with its cheap drones. Now the price of their pieces is skyrocketing for a reason that is not coincidental.

the format is absolutely doomed

by

There are twenty editions of one of the most successful shows in television history and still today a touchstone of everything that the subgenre reality has given later. In hits like ‘The island of temptations‘We can detect the DNA of ‘Big Brother’, but the father of the format is not doing well at all. at some very low audiences In its new edition there is a rebellion from the public, who are asking for changes on social networks. #Zeppelinifyouarenominated: The followers of reality They have expressed with that hashtag their frustration with Zeppelin TV, the producer of the program, accusing it of denaturalizing the essence of the program. Through it they have recovered moments that consider memorable of old editions. The most visible complaint came through an open letterwhich summed up the widespread feeling: “What we currently see on screen is no longer Big Brother. It is another program, with its name, but without its essence.” What are they complaining about? Among other protestsare the elimination of iconic moments from the program such as the interview with those expelled or their farewell to the rest of their colleagues from the studio. And the incorporation of mechanics foreign to the original format is rejected (“birdhouses” and “oasis” where contestants are isolated, “applicant” systems that delay entry to the house), all imported from ‘Secret Story’, the reality show that Zeppelin produced in 2021. Low audiences. The audience figures for the twentieth edition have established unprecedented negative marks for the format. In mid-November 2025, the program reached a all-time low of 11.3% of share with just 636,000 viewers. He format decline It is devastating: in 2002 the premiere of the third season registered a 38.7% share, but the premiere of ‘GH19’ in September 2024 barely reached 17.4% with 1 million viewers. But it is the latest edition that is being made historic lows in spectatorseven infecting ‘Temptation Island’. The reality show has been relegated to fifth position in its time slot. All over the world. The Spanish debacle is part of an international collapse of this format created in Holland 25 years ago. In the United Kingdom, the launch of ‘Celebrity Big Brother’ in April 2025 had almost a million viewers less than the previous year. The 2024 British edition of anonymous contestants also set its own negative record with the worst inaugural data in history of the program. In the US in 2025, it has suffered a spectacular fall too. The diagnosis is universal: the format has exhausted its capacity to surprise. Mediaset in trouble. The failure of ‘Big Brother 20’ is part of a broader corporate debacle. In August 2025, Telecinco registered an 8% screen share, its worst month in 35 years of history. The advertising hemorrhage is equally alarming: revenue plummeted from 450 million euros in 2019 to 316 million in the first half of 2025, a drop of 9.4% according to Infoadex data. The bleeding has forced the closure of production companies such as Fénix Media, responsible for ‘Socialité’, which has started a complete ERE. All of this has ended up precipitating a fall in five points of share in five years while Antena 3 accumulates 13 consecutive months as leader. In Xataka | ‘The one that is coming’ has a channel dedicated to it almost 24 hours a day. It is the best proof of Montepinar’s hegemony

A 25 Gbps mini-laser to connect absolutely everything

by

Two out of three satellites that orbit the earth are Starlinks, but Spacex does not conform to being the world’s largest satellite operator. Now he wants to become the trunk network of everything that is in space. The new Starlink laser mini. Minutes before aborting For the second consecutive day The tenth launch of Starship (this time for bad weather), Spacex published an unpublished video from its Starlink factory in Redmond. The company takes advantage of the video to show off its incredible production capacity, but also to reveal a technology that will change the rules of the game while competition Keep trying to deploy Its own constellation: a “mini laser” integrated in Starlink so that any satellite or space station can connect to its network from space. They are already testing it in orbit. Until now, Starlink’s laser links were able to transmit data to almost 200 Gbps: A technology that Spacex uses internally so that their own satellites communicate with each other, creating a interconnected mesh In space. The mini laser goes much further. Michael Nicolls, Vice President of Engineering of Starlink, confirmed in his X account The function of this new component: “The mini laser is designed to reach 25 Gbps link speeds at distances of up to 4000 km.” And it is already successfully tested aboard a satellite of the Starlink G10-20 mission. 25 Gbps to connect them to all. A 25 gigabits link per second, available for anyone who wants to integrate it, would allow land observation companies, scientific missions, commercial space stations or even other satellite constellations stop worrying about how to send their data to the earth. They would simply connect to Starlink’s “Wi-Fi Network” and take advantage of their global infrastructure. With this novelty, Starlink would go from being an Internet provider for Earth to an Internet provider for Earth and Space. A strategic movement that positions Spacex in the center of the future orbital economy, as well as travel to the moon and Mars. Is the X37B trying this technology? The timing of this announcement is at least interesting. Just a few days ago, on August 22, Spacex launched the eighth mission of the mysterious x-37b military plane. As it details Daniel Marín in Eurekaone of the few unscathed objectives of this mission is to make “demonstrations of communication technologies between satellites through infrared lasers with a high bandwidth”. This is a clear reference to Starlink, but it could also be related to the Starshield military constellation, which is, in essence, a militarized version of Starlink. The possibility that the X-37B is testing a version of this “mini laser” or a derived technology is very high. For the United States space force, to connect any of its assets in orbit to a low latency network such as Starshield or Starlink would be a huge tactical advantage. A factory that does not rest. These technological advances would not be possible without the industrial capacity that supports it. The Redmond factory is producing 70 satellites a week, which translates into more than 3,600 per year. This production cadence, which has gone from 120 satellites per month in 2020 to almost triple that figure, is what has allowed Starlink to deploy a constellation of more than 8,000 operating satellites, two thirds of all active satellites. With this new “mini laser”, Spacex is not only expanding its own network. The bridges are tending so that the rest of the space industry connects to it, consolidating a future where, if you want to be connected in orbit, you will have to knock on Elon Musk’s door. Image | Spacex In Xataka | The Ukraine Army has an almost important problem as Russia: Starlink belongs to Elon Musk

This album has been reproduced millions of times in Spotify but has not generated absolutely no benefit

by

‘Crisis (The Worthless Album)’ by Valentin Hansen It is not, of course, a normal album. Because Hansen is not a normal musician. It is rather A performative artist that he plotted this conceptual album with a single objective: not generating benefit, not leaving a trace on Spotify, demonstrating how absurd streaming They are getting used to us. 30 songs. In 2021, the artist based in Berlin Valentin Hansen launched this ‘crisis (The Worthless Album)’ which consisted of 30 tracks, all of them of 29 seconds. Why this duration? He stayed for a second to monetize them, generate Royalties or to be registered in the metrics of the platform, according to the rules of use of the platform. But here comes the amazing: he used a smartphones hacked to reproduce the album countless times. And demonstrate that it would not even generate benefits. A design issue. As They count on contemporary100‘Crisis (The Worthless Album)’ won zero euros in total, but “not by accident, but for a matter of pure design.” Its purpose was to generate exactly that benefit. It’s about a criticism of the economy of streamingwhere an artist earns $ 0.004 per reproduction, but algorithms favor mainstreamto what is already established purely economic interests, which falls into a very complicated mousetrap to make profitable. “I want to show how broken the system is,” Hansen said about his experiment. Real songs. Hansen is a real musician. It makes a self -conscious and hyperproduced indie (in fact, ‘crisis’ has eight real songs, only that the tracks are interrupted every 29 seconds, as has been said, thus starting each song in three or four pieces impossible to make profitable) and, in fact, ‘crisis’ arose as a reaction to its most popular song, ‘Killing a Friend’, after 1,7 million reproductions, only got 2,000 euros. Hence the criticism of the Spotify payment system: said in an interview than the initiative Bandcamp Fridayin which the platform gives all its income to artists, is the most reasonable way to make money with music in streaming. Other experiments in Spotify. It is not the first attempt to play with Spotify’s legal possibilities and vericuetos: Royalties). All completely silent. The band encouraged their followers to reproduce the album in continuous repetition while they slept, generating royalties. The goal? Finance with that money a tour of free concerts. And it worked: in seven weeks and after about 5.5 million views, ‘Sleepify’ generated $ 20,000. Of course, Spotify did not like this sympathetic hairmade and eliminated the album of its platform, adducing violations of its content policies and commenting that, as an effect of the media impact of ‘Sleepify’, they had received a large number of silent albums. Spotify ended up modifying its legal section, prohibiting issues in full in silence. Spotify mandates. For what Hansen’s experiment serves is to talk about the absolute dominance of Spotify in the industry and how unfair it is, therefore, that he has so much power and can decide how artists are rewarded and in what terms. And how that benefits the platformbut not to musicians. Therefore, it is important that in the face of the propaganda that Spotify is democratizing and verticalizing musicdiscordant voices such as Hansen still dare to denounce an unfair situation with artists. In Xataka | We already know what the key to something that seemed impossible, to earn money in Spotify was: being an AI

Smar intelligent without saying absolutely anything

by

Sam Altman was interviewed a few days ago by his brother Jack on the YouTube channel of this. And there is a moment of the interview in which Sam says “I think we have deciphered the reasoning in the models. We have a long way to go, but I think we know what to do.” Jack asks him why he believes it, and Sam says that “O3 is already quite intelligent”, and that he has heard people say “fuck, this is like a good doctorate.” That is all the explanation that the man who supposedly leads the race gives for create superintelligence. Ed Zitron has put it to give birth in Your last analysisbut there is something more interesting and general: the CEOs of the great technology They have developed a way of speaking that sounds intelligent but says absolutely nothing. And it is very widespread. When Pichai He says “I think AI will be somewhat bigger than the Internet” Without explaining how or why, without giving details, it is not inaccurate because. It is deliberately incomprehensible so that no one can catch him by lying. The pattern is usually repeated. When Satya Nadella is asked how Microsoft is going to reach 130,000 million in revenues for AI, Your answer It is “if we are going to have this explosion, abundance, whatever, of intelligence products available, the first thing we have to observe is the growth of GDP.” Satya Nadella It’s a top CEObut That answer is pure straw. He does not answer the question, but he sounds technical enough so that no one dares to interrupt him and ask him “hey, what the hell does that mean.” The media have created an ecosystem among all where it seems that it is forbidden to say “apologize but I do not understand” a technological CEO. And in the end, their products reflect that incoherence in one way or another. Chatgpt Answers are invented with the same forcefulness with which he replies that two plus two are four. Google is increasingly ambiguous. Microsoft products They harass you to use their AI When you just want to write without discomfort. Palma Phil Schiller takes, not CEO but an old Apple manager, when in 2017 he was asked about the Mac Mini, who had not updated and without any gesture of love or advertising campaign any. His answer was anthological: “The Mac Mini remains a product of our catalog.” And that’s it. They are CEOs who often have a hard time explaining their vision and their road map, but accumulate immense power and capital. Sometimes, that disability is a deliberate armor. In others, pure talk. While journalists in front of them continue to treat them as incontestable geniuses, without legitimacy to question their ambiguas when you do not empty, we will continue without receiving convincing explanations as users. Because nobody requires them to give them. In Xataka | The US charges for his AI thinking about the present. China gives it thinking about the next decades Outstanding image | OpenAI

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.