We believed that polar bears were doomed to disappear. In Norway they are getting fatter and healthier

For decades, the polar bear has become in the indisputable symbol of the climate crisis that we are living. The equation seemed quite simple and devastating: if there is less sea ice, they will be able to hunt less and, therefore, the bears will be more malnourished and may disappear. But what we are seeing has broken this logic, at least in one specific region of the Arctic. The paradigm shift. Against all odds, the polar bears of the Savalbard Archipelago, Norwayhave presented a better body condition than 25 years agoeven though their habitat is melting at a fast pace. And this has generated many questions. In order to answer this, the study led by Jon Aars of the Norwegian Polar Institutehas provided conclusive data after decades of monitoring these animals. all this thanks to 770 polar bears that have been in the focus of the study during the years 1995 and 2019 in the Barents region. They are getting fat. After analyzing all the measurement results, it was found that an ecological paradox existed: although the ice-free season in the area has lengthened significantly, these bears are increasing their weight significantly since 2005. The big question here is… How possible? The answer. The key to this unexpected resilience seems to lie in the unique biological productivity of the Barents Sea and in the adaptation capacity of these predators. According to the study, several simultaneous factors have occurred, such as prey density. This means that the loss of ice has concentrated these bears’ prey in smaller, coastal areas, paradoxically making them more accessible at certain times. But it does not stop there, since an increase in the number of seals has also been seen, and especially in bearded seals which is a much larger prey and rich in fat. A change of diet. This is where the flexibility of the predator comes in, since Svalbard’s eyes have begun to supplement their diet with terrestrial resources, including reindeer and bird eggstaking advantage of what the land offers when the sea fails. In short, Svalbard’s bears live in a “bubble” of ecological abundance that has cushioned, for now, the physical impact of ice loss due to global warming. There is no need to celebrate it. It is easy to fall into the temptation of using this study to minimize the impact of climate change because the fact that ice is becoming less and less has not affected the species. But the authors of the study point out that this is an anomaly that occurs in this specific area of ​​the Arctic but is not a global trend. In this way, while the bears of Svalbard enjoy this temporary respite, their relatives in Hudson Bay (Canada) and other regions of the Arctic show severe signs of malnutrition and above all a decrease in the number of animals. And the difference is that not all Arctic ecosystems are as rich as the Barents Sea. A mirage. This is what the study warns that we may have in front of us, since now the bear has been able to adapt to the situation, but the sea ice continues to retreat, we do not know what will happen. What is expected is that a tipping point may be reached where not even the richness of prey or reindeer eggs will be enough to sustain the current population, starting a new ecological crisis here. Images | Hans-Jurgen Mager In Xataka | They’re not kissing, they’re scanning: the complex science behind nose-to-nose contact in the animal kingdom

the format is absolutely doomed

There are twenty editions of one of the most successful shows in television history and still today a touchstone of everything that the subgenre reality has given later. In hits like ‘The island of temptations‘We can detect the DNA of ‘Big Brother’, but the father of the format is not doing well at all. at some very low audiences In its new edition there is a rebellion from the public, who are asking for changes on social networks. #Zeppelinifyouarenominated: The followers of reality They have expressed with that hashtag their frustration with Zeppelin TV, the producer of the program, accusing it of denaturalizing the essence of the program. Through it they have recovered moments that consider memorable of old editions. The most visible complaint came through an open letterwhich summed up the widespread feeling: “What we currently see on screen is no longer Big Brother. It is another program, with its name, but without its essence.” What are they complaining about? Among other protestsare the elimination of iconic moments from the program such as the interview with those expelled or their farewell to the rest of their colleagues from the studio. And the incorporation of mechanics foreign to the original format is rejected (“birdhouses” and “oasis” where contestants are isolated, “applicant” systems that delay entry to the house), all imported from ‘Secret Story’, the reality show that Zeppelin produced in 2021. Low audiences. The audience figures for the twentieth edition have established unprecedented negative marks for the format. In mid-November 2025, the program reached a all-time low of 11.3% of share with just 636,000 viewers. He format decline It is devastating: in 2002 the premiere of the third season registered a 38.7% share, but the premiere of ‘GH19’ in September 2024 barely reached 17.4% with 1 million viewers. But it is the latest edition that is being made historic lows in spectatorseven infecting ‘Temptation Island’. The reality show has been relegated to fifth position in its time slot. All over the world. The Spanish debacle is part of an international collapse of this format created in Holland 25 years ago. In the United Kingdom, the launch of ‘Celebrity Big Brother’ in April 2025 had almost a million viewers less than the previous year. The 2024 British edition of anonymous contestants also set its own negative record with the worst inaugural data in history of the program. In the US in 2025, it has suffered a spectacular fall too. The diagnosis is universal: the format has exhausted its capacity to surprise. Mediaset in trouble. The failure of ‘Big Brother 20’ is part of a broader corporate debacle. In August 2025, Telecinco registered an 8% screen share, its worst month in 35 years of history. The advertising hemorrhage is equally alarming: revenue plummeted from 450 million euros in 2019 to 316 million in the first half of 2025, a drop of 9.4% according to Infoadex data. The bleeding has forced the closure of production companies such as Fénix Media, responsible for ‘Socialité’, which has started a complete ERE. All of this has ended up precipitating a fall in five points of share in five years while Antena 3 accumulates 13 consecutive months as leader. In Xataka | ‘The one that is coming’ has a channel dedicated to it almost 24 hours a day. It is the best proof of Montepinar’s hegemony

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.