the countries that are doomed to extinction and those that are not

Geographically speaking, the world is divided in two. On the one hand there are countries where more people are born than die: as a result, the population grows naturally. On the other hand, those countries where more people die than are born, which implies a population contraction and eventual disappearance… unless someone remedies it from the outside. What this map reveals Our World in data At a glance it is not something that comes overnight nor are its consequences. Behind these two colors hides the future of the economies and public systems of the different states of the planet. The map represents the natural population change during 2023, that is, the difference between how many people are born and how many die based on data from the official demographic report World Population Prospects 2024 of the UN. To prepare it, the UN used data from 1,910 censuses, birth and death records from 169 countries and 3,189 demographic surveys, so this is a fairly exhaustive compilation. Countries in blue have more births than deaths and those in orange have more deaths than births. Migration is excluded from the calculation, which allows us to see only the reproductive dynamics of each society without the corrective effect of flows of people. This reality is important because a country can appear orange on the map and still not lose inhabitants if it receives enough migrants. Note: the historical “magic” figure for a society to remain stable considering only reproduction it has been 2.1 babies per woman on average. That in a state more people die than are born on a sustained basis ago let all the alarm signals go off insofar as it causes a structural problem: the population ages, the population pyramid is inverted and there are fewer and fewer working people to finance the welfare system. Health, education and social protection systems were designed for younger and larger populations. According to the United Nationsby 2070 the number of people aged 65 or over will exceed those under 18 years of age globally. And spoiler: most states in demographic decline are world powers. And in some cases, the decline is practically irreversible. The countries that are born and the countries that die Where more people die than are born. Our World in Data A look at the countries that die returns places like Japan, China, South Korea, Russia and almost all of Eastern Europe. The most extreme case is Japan, where there are twice as many deaths as births (1.2 children per woman). South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan are between 0.7 and 0.9, well below that 2.1. China has a 1 and a particular history: the one-child policy applied between 1980 and 2015 artificially reduced entire generations. It is true that it was abandoned years ago, but the structural damage has already been done. On the old continent, Germany has had more deaths than births since the 70s and France, which was practically the only state that was saved thanks to decades of public aid for motherhood, has seen how that balance was broken. Although this map uses data from 2023, in 2025 France record more deaths than births for the first time since World War II. The block in blue includes almost all of Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and South and Southeast Asia. And although the map is a simplification that reduces the world in two colors, Ethiopia should be extremely blue: it has more than five times as many births as deaths. The populations of these countries have high fertility rates and a young population. Of course, this growth is not synonymous with well-being: some of these places combine high birth rates with high infant mortality, low life expectancy and precarious infrastructure to sustain this population growth. Africa is the great demographic hope in terms of growth, which is also a challenge in terms of employment, education and resources. Among the bulk of countries that are growing, there are many developing countries, but there is also the particular case of the United States: it has 20% more births than deaths. Talking about countries that are born and die sounds alarming, but let’s remember that migration is not present on this map, which means that states like Germany, Italy or Spain are not losing population in absolute terms. This means that generational replacement becomes directly dependent on migratory flows, which generates integration, coexistence and institutional challenges that cartography does not reflect. In Xataka | Europe’s brutal demographic crisis can be explained on a single map with one country as the protagonist: Nigeria In Xataka | Europe is divided in two: the devastating map of deindustrialization Cover | Our World in data

We believed that polar bears were doomed to disappear. In Norway they are getting fatter and healthier

For decades, the polar bear has become in the indisputable symbol of the climate crisis that we are living. The equation seemed quite simple and devastating: if there is less sea ice, they will be able to hunt less and, therefore, the bears will be more malnourished and may disappear. But what we are seeing has broken this logic, at least in one specific region of the Arctic. The paradigm shift. Against all odds, the polar bears of the Savalbard Archipelago, Norwayhave presented a better body condition than 25 years agoeven though their habitat is melting at a fast pace. And this has generated many questions. In order to answer this, the study led by Jon Aars of the Norwegian Polar Institutehas provided conclusive data after decades of monitoring these animals. all this thanks to 770 polar bears that have been in the focus of the study during the years 1995 and 2019 in the Barents region. They are getting fat. After analyzing all the measurement results, it was found that an ecological paradox existed: although the ice-free season in the area has lengthened significantly, these bears are increasing their weight significantly since 2005. The big question here is… How possible? The answer. The key to this unexpected resilience seems to lie in the unique biological productivity of the Barents Sea and in the adaptation capacity of these predators. According to the study, several simultaneous factors have occurred, such as prey density. This means that the loss of ice has concentrated these bears’ prey in smaller, coastal areas, paradoxically making them more accessible at certain times. But it does not stop there, since an increase in the number of seals has also been seen, and especially in bearded seals which is a much larger prey and rich in fat. A change of diet. This is where the flexibility of the predator comes in, since Svalbard’s eyes have begun to supplement their diet with terrestrial resources, including reindeer and bird eggstaking advantage of what the land offers when the sea fails. In short, Svalbard’s bears live in a “bubble” of ecological abundance that has cushioned, for now, the physical impact of ice loss due to global warming. There is no need to celebrate it. It is easy to fall into the temptation of using this study to minimize the impact of climate change because the fact that ice is becoming less and less has not affected the species. But the authors of the study point out that this is an anomaly that occurs in this specific area of ​​the Arctic but is not a global trend. In this way, while the bears of Svalbard enjoy this temporary respite, their relatives in Hudson Bay (Canada) and other regions of the Arctic show severe signs of malnutrition and above all a decrease in the number of animals. And the difference is that not all Arctic ecosystems are as rich as the Barents Sea. A mirage. This is what the study warns that we may have in front of us, since now the bear has been able to adapt to the situation, but the sea ice continues to retreat, we do not know what will happen. What is expected is that a tipping point may be reached where not even the richness of prey or reindeer eggs will be enough to sustain the current population, starting a new ecological crisis here. Images | Hans-Jurgen Mager In Xataka | They’re not kissing, they’re scanning: the complex science behind nose-to-nose contact in the animal kingdom

the format is absolutely doomed

There are twenty editions of one of the most successful shows in television history and still today a touchstone of everything that the subgenre reality has given later. In hits like ‘The island of temptations‘We can detect the DNA of ‘Big Brother’, but the father of the format is not doing well at all. at some very low audiences In its new edition there is a rebellion from the public, who are asking for changes on social networks. #Zeppelinifyouarenominated: The followers of reality They have expressed with that hashtag their frustration with Zeppelin TV, the producer of the program, accusing it of denaturalizing the essence of the program. Through it they have recovered moments that consider memorable of old editions. The most visible complaint came through an open letterwhich summed up the widespread feeling: “What we currently see on screen is no longer Big Brother. It is another program, with its name, but without its essence.” What are they complaining about? Among other protestsare the elimination of iconic moments from the program such as the interview with those expelled or their farewell to the rest of their colleagues from the studio. And the incorporation of mechanics foreign to the original format is rejected (“birdhouses” and “oasis” where contestants are isolated, “applicant” systems that delay entry to the house), all imported from ‘Secret Story’, the reality show that Zeppelin produced in 2021. Low audiences. The audience figures for the twentieth edition have established unprecedented negative marks for the format. In mid-November 2025, the program reached a all-time low of 11.3% of share with just 636,000 viewers. He format decline It is devastating: in 2002 the premiere of the third season registered a 38.7% share, but the premiere of ‘GH19’ in September 2024 barely reached 17.4% with 1 million viewers. But it is the latest edition that is being made historic lows in spectatorseven infecting ‘Temptation Island’. The reality show has been relegated to fifth position in its time slot. All over the world. The Spanish debacle is part of an international collapse of this format created in Holland 25 years ago. In the United Kingdom, the launch of ‘Celebrity Big Brother’ in April 2025 had almost a million viewers less than the previous year. The 2024 British edition of anonymous contestants also set its own negative record with the worst inaugural data in history of the program. In the US in 2025, it has suffered a spectacular fall too. The diagnosis is universal: the format has exhausted its capacity to surprise. Mediaset in trouble. The failure of ‘Big Brother 20’ is part of a broader corporate debacle. In August 2025, Telecinco registered an 8% screen share, its worst month in 35 years of history. The advertising hemorrhage is equally alarming: revenue plummeted from 450 million euros in 2019 to 316 million in the first half of 2025, a drop of 9.4% according to Infoadex data. The bleeding has forced the closure of production companies such as Fénix Media, responsible for ‘Socialité’, which has started a complete ERE. All of this has ended up precipitating a fall in five points of share in five years while Antena 3 accumulates 13 consecutive months as leader. In Xataka | ‘The one that is coming’ has a channel dedicated to it almost 24 hours a day. It is the best proof of Montepinar’s hegemony

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.