usatoday24

in China they explore an alternative inspired by nature

by

For years we have associated drones with a very specific image: unmanned devices with several propellers rotating at full speed, capable of recording, monitoring or even form figures in the sky at mass events. It is the reference that we have internalized and the one that usually comes to mind when we think about these devices. However, it is not the only possible way to understand a drone. While this model has been consolidated, proposals have emerged that seek to replicate the flight of living beings instead of depending on rotors, opening a path that until recently seemed closer to fiction than to real engineering. Drones with wings. According to 163.coma team from Beijing University of Science and Technology has developed several flapping-wing drones inspired by animals such as eagles, pigeons, butterflies and beetles. Among them, the model based on an eagle has attracted special attention for one specific fact: it has reached 256 minutes of continuous flight, a figure that marks a record within this category. The chain itself also recalled that in 2023 a bionic airplane developed by researchers at the Northwest Polytechnic University of China recorded 185 minutes and 30 seconds, then a Guinness record in this area. Another way to fly. If these prototypes are attracting attention, it is not only because of their appearance, but because of the technical principle on which they are based. Global Times defines them as bionic unmanned aerial vehicles capable of imitating the flight of living beings by flapping their wings. According to the same medium, it is the type of drone that most closely approximates the flight of flying organisms in nature. Added to this base, in the model inspired by an eagle, is a visual system designed to recognize, locate and follow vehicles, people, buildings or license plates, as explained by researcher Wu Xiaoyang. What we do know. It is advisable to separate what is confirmed from what has been interpreted from these images. Information disseminated by Chinese state media describes these drones as an advance in research into bionic unmanned systems, with progress in flight time and detection capabilities. However, it does not offer details about its operational deployment or specific use in real scenarios. In fact, researchers point out that challenges related to flight autonomy and system intelligence still need to be resolved before talking about broader implementation. There are obstacles. If we look beyond the current results, the experts themselves point out that the road ahead remains demanding. According to Wang Zhijie, from the Beijing Institute of Technology, one of the main challenges is developing batteries with greater energy density that allow this type of flight to be sustained for longer. Added to this are high-precision, small-sized beating mechanisms, as well as materials capable of adaptive deformation, imitating how bird wings change in response to aerodynamics to maintain efficiency. In that context, what we have is a technology that points in several directions, but is still being defined. Global Times possible uses in environmental monitoring, rescue and other specialized missions, although without specifying how or when they will materialize. Beyond that, research remains focused on making these systems more autonomous and efficient. If this evolution is confirmed, we would be facing a different path in the development of drones, one that seeks to get closer to biological flight instead of continuing to perfect the more conventional scheme. Images | CCTV In Xataka | The United States has found how to protect its most vulnerable ships on the high seas: with escort drones

Magnesium has become the trendy sleep supplement. This is what science really says

by

It is undeniable that magnesium has reached a great fame among many people who see the need to take it absolutely every day as just another medication that their doctor has prescribed. And it is no wonder, since the great list of benefits that have been sold in recent months about magnesium invites anyone to take it because it supposedly improves everything. Although some of these benefits are really dubious, such as limprovement in sleep quality. The evidence. Right now science try to find the relationship that can justify that magnesium has an important role in our quality of sleep. In this case, observational studies suggest that good levels of this mineral are equivalent to better sleep, but clinical trials suggest that the benefits are barely noticeable. Especially when we talk about patients who have started magnesium supplementation. There are examples. A key systematic review of 2023 put the cards on the table after analyzing different studies, pointing out that people who themselves maintain a good level of magnesium snore less, suffer less daytime sleepiness and have a better sleep duration. The problem comes when controlled trials of supplementing magnesium to people who have sleep problems do not show a consistently good result. But they go further, seeing that the benefits depend mainly on two factors: Take high doses of magnesium with a daily intake of 500 mg. Previous status of the patient, since it works better if the patient previously had a magnesium deficiency proven by a blood test. Where is it most noticeable? Here a 2012 study with elderly people suffering from primary insomnia who took 500 mg of magnesium for eight weeks demonstrated a tangible change, as it not only improved sleep hours, but also increased efficiency. The physiological changes shown were an increase in melatonin, a reduction in serum cortisol, which is the stress hormone, and a reduction in latency, as it was confirmed that magnesium reduces the time it takes for an older person to fall asleep. There are many formulas. The interest in magnesium has led different companies to begin creating different presentations that improve its absorption. In this way, recent trials between 2024 and 2026 have evaluated doses of 1 gram daily (for periods of 3 to 6 weeks) in young and middle-aged adults. To measure the effect, here the researchers used rings like the Oura Ring to achieve a significant increase in deep sleep phases, and also a notable improvement in general efficiency. The small print. Given all this, we can conclude that, if you do not have a magnesium deficiency in your blood, supplementing it does not make any sense to improve sleep quality. This reminds us how important it is to follow medical advice and request an analysis to determine possible treatment and look for the reasons for poor quality sleep. This way, if you have a sleep deficit, you don’t have to go out and buy magnesium at the supermarket because someone has said on TikTok that its effect on our quality of sleep is almost miraculous. Images | Natali Hordiiuk Isabella Fischer In Xataka | There are people obsessed with consuming magnesium as a supplement when the best way is to put it in your diet

Shakira wants to put 300,000 people in a place that does not convince the Government at all

by

Live Nation and Shakira have now officially presented Macondo Park, a 40-hectare temporary venue at the Iberdrola Music in Villaverde designed for close the tour ‘Women no longer cry’ with a nine-concert residency in Madrid in September. The problem: the Government delegate in Madrid has been warning for years that the space does not meet security conditions for massive events and has formally asked the City Council not to authorize them. Stadiums make money. What Shakira and Live Nation have presented is not exactly a concert: it is a temporary infrastructure designed ad hoc by the international study BIGknown for projects such as the Danish pavilion at the Shanghai Expo or the expansion of the National Museum of Qatar. According to data from the organization, the so-called Shakira Stadium will occupy four hectares within the Iberdrola Music space, with capacity for 50,000 people per night: 26,688 seats in the stands, 25,000 standing and around 3,000 in the VIP area. Macondism. Macondo Park will be deployed around the stadium, which takes its name from the fictional town created by Gabriel García Márquez in ‘One Hundred Years of Solitude’: 40 hectares active for twelve hours each concert day. The cultural program, baptized ‘Es latina’, includes gastronomy, workshops, exhibitions and sales of Latin American crafts, all selected by Shakira herself. There will also be a specific area for children called Macondito, designed (according to the organization) with the participation of the artist’s children, Milan and Sasha. The goal, according to Live Nation, is to “demonstrate what it means to be Latino” and project that cultural imaginary in Europe. Minitour without moving. Some pertinent figures: nine performances in Madrid, scheduled for September 18, 19, 20, 25, 26 and 27, to which have been added October 2, 3 and 4 due to the very high demand and how quickly the pre-sale sold out. The entire project expects more than 300,000 attendees throughout the residency. Ticket prices range between 73.50 and 181.50 euros, with VIP packages exceeding 1,000. And it will take 69 days to build the complete structure of this spectacular theme park around the artist. Problems in Villaverde. This great plan collides with a somewhat complicated background. Iberdrola Music is the same space that has hosted the Mad Cool festival for years. It was also the scene of the Harry Styles concert in 2023, where organizational failures led to monumental traffic jams and part of the audience ended up walking along the M-45. In the letter he wrote to the City CouncilGovernment delegate Francisco Martín recalls that he already warned about the venue in July 2023 on the occasion of the Reggaeton Beach Festival. According to Martín, in an institutional meeting held in 2024 it was found that there continued to be “relevant deficiencies in terms of accessibility, mobility and organization of entry and exit flows, incompatible with the celebration of large events in safe conditions.” The administrator of the Mad Cool festival even faced a request for a two-year prison sentence from the Prosecutor’s Office for violations related to noise pollution. It’s not a festival. Martín also differentiates between the festival model, where the public enters and leaves in stages for hours, and the “fan phenomenon”: a massive concert where 50,000 people try to leave the venue in a very narrow time frame. It is this second scenario that, in his opinion, Iberdrola Music is not prepared to absorb. Crossing of accusations. As it could not be otherwise, this open letter was followed by an exchange of accusations with little or nothing to do with music. Borja Carabante, Urban Planning delegate of the City Council, accused Martin of “trying to boycott, harm and harm the city.” Mayor José Luis Almeida pointed in the same direction: he described it as “extraordinary” that Shakira chose Madrid as the culmination of her tour and even hinted that up to ten dates could be held. Mariano de Paco, Minister of Culture of the Community of Madrid, defined it as “great news.” The preceding Adele. Promoter Pino Sagliocco, president of Live Nation, avoided entering the political fray. He defended that the mobility plan “is already done” and endorsed by engineers, and insisted that Iberdrola Music is “an experienced and well-conditioned space.” He compared Shakira’s plan to Adele’s precedentwho established his residence in a park in Munich, comparable in size to this Macondo. The center of the debate. There is slaps for pre-sale ticketsbut municipal authorization has not been granted, and the Government Delegation has made it clear that it will go “as far as necessary” to ensure that the venue offers guarantees. For now, there is silence from both sides of the Administration. The conclusion of all this is that the debate is not led by Shakira, but by Madrid’s real capacity to manage massive events outside the urban center, with access infrastructure that several reports consider insufficient. After 17 countries, Shakira’s tour culminates in the only place on the planet where organizing a live show means invoking a perfect storm. In Xataka | We Spaniards have stopped watching TV, going to the cinema and reading books: the only thing that interests us is going to concerts

The generational conflict with Generation Z is costing us a lot of money: $56 billion

by

There is a silent war in offices around the world over the focus on AI adoption at work. It has no declared sides or visible battles, but its devastating effects already have a price: a scandalously high one. We are not talking about employees who lose their jobs because an AI does its jobwe talk about an intergenerational war that has been declared between the baby boom generation and generation Z due to the discrepancy of use of this technology. The damage it is causing that confrontation It is not nonsense: almost one working day lost per week for each employee, in addition to projects that do not progress and burnt-out workers who, instead of looking for solutions, are looking for a new job. A very very expensive war. A published study by Salesloft and the consulting firm Workplace Intelligence based on surveys of 2,000 employees, puts figures on the intergenerational battle for the implementation of AI and other technologies that is being experienced in some US companies: 56,000 million dollars a year in terms of lost productivity due to conflict between generations. These losses are not due to misuse or ignorance of technology or lack of employee performance, but because boomers and Gen Z have communication problems and have different expectations about balance between work and personal life. A day’s work wasted for not understanding each other. That conflict between employees more veterans and those who have just joined, translates into a combined loss of 5.3 hours per week of lost productivity for each employee. Steve Cox, CEO of Salesloft, explained the phenomenon in his report: “The $56 billion productivity loss is just the visible cost. When AI adoption is fragmented, the damage multiplies and leads to missed forecasts, slower execution, and higher turnover quarter after quarter. At that point, generational conflict is not a culture problem; it is a balance problem.” They prefer to talk to a bot. A relevant fact from the study indicates that 39% of Generation Z respondents say they prefer to be directed by an AI than by a boomer, while 25% of boomers prefer to work with an AI than with a fellow Gen Z. That’s how heated the mood is. The tensions do not remain only in the environment, this intergenerational friction is causing 28% of Generation Z workers to acknowledge that they are looking for another job so they don’t have to work with boomers. Similarly, 19% of boomers say they are considering early retirementpartly because he can’t stand his younger colleagues anymore. AI, gasoline or solution? Although many of them have indicated that they prefer to have a bot as a boss rather than someone from the “rival” generation, artificial intelligence is aggravating the situation instead of softening it. The problem is that 64% of employees admit that they are not even using the AI ​​tools they already have available well. The study reveals that 60% of boomers surveyed believe the way Gen Z uses technology is hurting customer relationships. Young people, on the other hand, respond in the same tone: 64% think that boomers’ resistance to adopting new tools is slowing down innovation, and 63% say that this attitude is costing them many sales. However, there is room for optimism because both generations agree in some aspects. 86% of respondents believe that AI could improve knowledge sharing between generations, 80% that it could reduce the experience gap, and 79% of participants believe that it could improve communication between teams of different ages. The clash is not just about AI: it is about values. Beyond the tools and the adoption of technology, the underlying problem is values ​​at work. 71% of Gen Z respondents believe boomers value plus the hours in the chair than the results obtained, and 56% point them out as those responsible for the toxic environment that exists in many companies. On the other hand, 64% of more veteran employees believe that Gen Z puts your personal life ahead of the job needs. The assessment of these employees is correct and confirms it a study on job preferences among generation Z prepared by the consulting firm Robert Walters. 52% of the young people interviewed stated that avoided promotions to not take on more responsibilities that were not going to translate into economic benefits or a great evolution in their work career, but rather into more stress and loss of work. time for your personal life. In Xataka | We have found the “kryptonite” of Generation Z: they are experts in apps, but they don’t know how to use a printer Image | Freepik (pch.vector)

There is a Basque company that is making a fortune with an unexpected business: ripening bananas from the Canary Islands

by

100 million euros of turnover ripening bananas. It is the objective of Musanorte, a company with Canarian roots and headquarters in Vizcaya that has turned a niche as specific and far from the focus as the controlled ripening of fruit into an economic engine for the Orozko region. Your task is not to grow, but what happens after the harvest. In their facilities, the Canarian banana arrives green and comes out ready to eat. Controlled maturation. What Musanorte does with bananas is a process that much of the fruit goes through that we see in supermarkets. So that the bananas arrive at the stores at their peak, with that bright yellow tone without darkening, they are placed in chambers in which the temperature and ethylene is applied to them. Ethylene is what is known as maturation hormone and it is released by vegetables naturally. By adding it artificially, the process is accelerated. The company. Musanorte is a subsidiary of Mercamusa, a company dedicated to the marketing of fruit that also has a ripening plant in Alicante. In 2017, Mercamusa was purchased by Eurobananaa Canarian company that sought to eliminate intermediaries and thus better control quality while saving costs. Production takes place in the Canary Islands and the peninsular offices are dedicated to ripening and packaging. Capacity and investment. With more than 21 ripening chambers and two packaging lines, Musanorte has the capacity to manage 40,000 tons of bananas per yearwhich are added to the 30,000 tons of capacity of the Alicante plant. The Musanorte plant has been operational since 2020, but it was not until recently that it received an investment of 24 million euros that has allowed it to increase its capacity. They hope to reach 100 million euros in turnover and also have announced the creation of 100 new jobs in the region. The banana crisis. In 2025 the price of Canary Islands bananas skyrocketed, reaching 7 euros per kilo. In September we talked about the crisis that the banana production sector was going through: Producing them cost more than what the farmers, who survived thanks to aid from the European Union, ended up receiving. The situation has improved, but not enoughand currently production costs remain very highwhich strains the profitability of producers. Image | Wikipedia In Xataka | Neither patting nor waving them in the air: the science of choosing a good melon in the supermarket

Taiwan produces 90% of the world’s advanced chips. Its natural gas reserves last exactly 12 days

by

In global energy markets, alarm bells do not always ring loudly; Sometimes all you have to do is watch where the boats are sailing. While the West observes the already known Third Gulf War With a mixture of horror and remoteness, Asia is suffering the direct impact. The colossal Ras Laffan facility in Qatar—which processes about a fifth of global liquefied natural gas (LNG)— has suffered damage by 17% of its infrastructure after the Iranian attacks. 12 days. At the exact center of the geopolitical target is Taiwan. The island has a practical monopoly on the world’s most advanced chips, but its “silicon shield” hangs by an extremely fragile logistical thread: an energy supply chain whose legal security threshold requires a minimum of just 11 to 12 days of natural gas reserves. The fatal panorama in Asia. Asia is on the front line of this fuel crisis as it buys more than 80% of the crude oil that transits through the blocked Strait of Hormuz. The nations of the region have had to quickly dust off the survival manuals of the COVID-19 era. Philippines has become the first country in declaring a state of “national energy emergency”, warning of an imminent danger and turning to coal to reduce costs. In South Korea, the government has asked its citizens Take shorter showers, use public transportation, and avoid charging your phones at night. Sri Lanka declared on Wednesdays as a holiday to save fuel, and in Thailand, officials have received the order to take off their suits, use the stairs and telework. china from chill. However, the contrast with China it’s abysmal. While its neighbors panic, the Asian giant observes the chaos coldly. Five years ago, Xi Jinping ordered to secure the country’s “energy rice bowl.” Today, thanks to a massive accumulation of sanctioned crude oil (bought cheaply from Russia or Iran), the shielding of renewables and a vehicle park where electric cars are the majority, China has built an invisible Great Wall that isolates it from fossil volatility. A trade war against the clock. This hydrocarbon drought not only turns off the lights, but paralyzes the industry. According to Commonwealth Magazinethe petrochemical and plastics sector has been the first major victim. The giant Formosa Petrochemical has had to issue force majeure notices after running out of raw materials, and prices of key materials such as ABS (used in car parts) have soared by up to 50%. At a logistical level, a trade war has broken out ruthless battle between Europe and Asia to seize the few available LNG shipments. Spot prices in Asia have doubled, and ships originally sailing to Spain or France are diverting their course to the Pacific in the face of more lucrative offers. In this Darwinian scenario, South Asia is acting as the global “shock absorber”: price-sensitive countries, such as Pakistan or Bangladesh, cannot compete and are forced to destroy demand or paralyze industries, leaving gas available for the giants that can afford it. To mitigate the blow on their own streets, governments like Japan They plan to inject billions in subsidies, while Taiwan has committed to absorb 60% of the increase in crude oil prices. Taiwan’s “Achilles heel” and the check on chips. If there is a critical point in this crisis, It is the island of Taiwan. In 2025, Taiwan relied on imports to meet 95% of its energy needs, including more than 99% of its oil and natural gas demand. Before the war, it received more than 38% of its annual natural gas supply and approximately 70% of its crude oil from the Middle East. The structural problem is time. While nations like South Korea have the capacity to store gas for 52 days and Japan for three weeks, Taiwan is walking on the wire. As pointed out Bloombergis an almost non-existent room for maneuver for an island where electricity generation based on natural gas has expanded to almost 48%. An immediate buffer. To avoid collapse in the short term, the Taiwanese Ministry of Economy has acted quickly with a checkbook. Minister Kung Ming-hsin has confirmed that supply planning is already covered for March, April and May, and they have even secured half of their replacement agreements for the month of June. Away from the imminent blackout, the island’s reserves have managed to remain above the safety threshold of 12 days since the fighting broke out. However, this short-term patch does not turn off the alarms. The real danger lurks in the summer, when high temperatures historically trigger electricity demand. A prolonged blackout: global chaos. The semiconductor sector contributes around 20% of Taiwan’s GDP. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), which produces about 90% of the chips most advanced in the world (vital for AI and military technology), alone consumes approximately 9% of all electricity on the island. But gas is not the only missing input; Added to this is the disruption in the supply of secretive but vital raw materials such as bromine and helium (a third of which is processed in Qatar). The experts They warn that if the interruption of helium exceeds 14 days, the chip production lines will go into technical stoppage. With summer just around the corner and electricity demand about to skyrocket, the island operates at its limit. The pressure is so immense that the historically reluctant Taiwanese government is already openly debating the reactivation of nuclear energy, recognizing that the explosive growth in electricity demand linked to the development of Artificial Intelligence is changing all the rules of the energy game. The geopolitical board: opportunism and contradictions. Beijing has not been slow to intervene. Taking advantage of the panic, the Chinese government has thrown a poisoned lifeline. According to Chen Binhua, spokesperson for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, collected in South China Morning Postthe Asian giant offered the island a stable, abundant and cheap energy supply in exchange for accepting “peaceful reunification.” Taipei’s response was blunt: Vice Minister of Economy, Ho Chin-tsang, rejected the offer, calling it “cognitive … Read more

The biggest oil crisis is not making them blink for a second in the stock market

by

We have been immersed in what can now be cataloged like the Third Gulf War. Since the United States and Israel offensive against Iran began at the end of February, the world has faced the greatest disruption of energy supply of its history. We are talking about a crisis that has paralyzed 20% of the world’s crude oil, sequestering about 20 million barrels a day They cannot cross the Strait of Hormuz. Missile falls, drones setting fire to infrastructure and thousands of deaths in the region. The impasse. Any basic economics textbook would dictate that financial markets should be in complete panic. However, the opposite occurs. It is enough for the White House to hint at a rapprochement or a vague ceasefire for the stock market to skyrocket, ignoring the physical fundamentals of a war in full swing. Wall Street lives in a parallel reality: the biggest oil crisis does not make them blink for a second. A virtual collapse in the face of a real war. This same week, the markets experienced 48 hours of unprecedented volatility. As detailed oil priceoil prices fell sharply in the Asian session on Wednesday, falling more than 5%. Brent crude oil, the reference in Europe, pierced downwards the psychological barrier of $100, while the US WTI fell to $87.51. The reason for this relief? According to the agency Reutersthe United States would have sent a 15-point peace proposal to Iran through intermediaries in Pakistan. US President Donald Trump boasted to the media that “productive” negotiations were moving toward a resolution. The screens of the traders were automatically dyed green: the European STOXX 600 index rose 1.2% and London’s FTSE 100 rose 1.1%. As Amelie Derambure explainedfrom the manager Amundi, the market simply launched itself to buy the idea of ​​a relief rally (a surge of relief) at the possibility of a temporary ceasefire. The bombs keep falling. However, there is no ceasefire; This should be clear. How to collect ReutersEbrahim Zolfaqari, spokesman for Iran’s joint military command, publicly addressed Trump on state television with these words: “Has the level of your internal struggle reached the stage of negotiating with yourself? We will never make a deal with you.” At the same time, military reality contradicts stock market optimism. The Pentagon prepares the deployment of elements of the 82nd Airborne Division to the region, a drone attack just hit a fuel tank at Kuwait International Airport, and Israel is deeply skeptical of any concessions Washington might make to Tehran in the shadows. Investors “bewitched” by the algorithm. To understand this disconnection you have to delve into the psychology of the market. An analysis published by FortunePaul Donovan, chief economist of UBSclaims that Wall Street is “spellbound” by the good news. “Markets do not react to information, they generally react to social media posts and headlines, even if they are fake news or contradictory,” says Donovan. Investors suffer from a cocktail of loss aversion and confirmation bias. They desperately want the war to end, so they embrace any story that confirms that desire and ignore negative news. Added to this, the “TACO” phenomenon (Trump Always Chickens Outor “Trump always cows”), a belief rooted in the New York trading floor that the tenant of the White House will end up backing down from the economic pain of a prolonged conflict to protect financial stability. Narrative as a weapon of war. Added to this is what energy expert Javier Blas defines in his column Bloomberg as jawboning (verbal intervention). The White House is winning the narrative battle in the markets without moving a single physical barrel. Trump’s constant messages in Social Truth promising a quick resolution—and even lifting sanctions on countries like Russia to flood the market—have managed to stop the panic. Blas sums it up perfectly: “Instead of being a sign of weakness, TACO is playing in Trump’s favor. No one knows for sure when or if he will try to end the war, which has been enough to prevent the traders skyrocket the price of oil.” The desperation to cling to any positive headline is such that it generates episodes of extreme volatility and information chaos. He Financial Times reported in his coverage how crude oil suffered wild fluctuations (Brent fell 11% to rebound shortly after) after a tweet by the US Secretary of Energy, Chris Wright, stating that the Navy was already escorting oil tankers through Hormuz. The message was deleted minutes later and denied by the White House itself, but the effect on the algorithms had already occurred. The bath of physical reality. While Wall Street plays a game of guessing the next tweets from the Oval Office, the physical reality of oil is stubborn. A report from Bloomberg puts his finger on the sore: The physical market continues to deal with shortages, and the war has demonstrated the absolute control that Iran exercises over the Strait of Hormuz. Although Tehran informed the International Maritime Organization that “non-hostile” ships can transit, the route remains effectively closed and reports circulate about the presence of dozens of naval mines Iranians in the area. The mathematics of disaster, detailed by Reutersthey are chilling. After 25 days of conflict, the world has stopped receiving 500 million barrels (the equivalent of five full days of global supply). The logistical desperation is such that Saudi Arabia has boosted its exports from the port of Yanbu, on the Red Sea, to avoid Hormuz. To compound the crisis, Russia has suspended cargoes at its Baltic ports following a vicious Ukrainian drone attack, adding more uncertainty to the global market. Larry Fink, CEO of the management company BlackRocksummed it up bluntly in statements to the BBC: “If Iran continues to be a threat to Hormuz and oil settles between $100 and $150 per barrel, we will have a global recession.” Collateral damage. The narrative chaos has even reached gold, which has lost their protection status. According to Financial Timesthe price of the precious metal has plummeted 16% since the start of … Read more

Europe is within your reach, including Spain

by

A ballistic missile can reach speeds greater than Mach 10 and travel thousands of kilometers in less than half an hour, even leaving the atmosphere before falling back towards its target. That combination of speed and height is what has made this type of weapon one of the pillars of military strategy since the mid-20th century. Europe enters the map. A few days ago, Iran crossed a line that had been theoretical for years. The launch of missiles towards Diego Garcíaabout 4,000 kilometers away, was not only a military movement, it was a full-fledged strategic message. This distance is approximately equivalent to that between Iran from many European capitals. For the first time, range has ceased to be a hypothesis and has become something demonstrated in combat. Because although the missiles failed, the gesture changes the board, and Europe is no longer out of reach conflict potential. What really happened. Iran fired two long range missiles towards a joint base of the United States and the United Kingdom in the Indian Ocean. One failed during flight and the other was intercepted by American defenses. The attack did not achieve the desired impact, but it did demonstrate a capacity that until now had not been shown clearly. It is not so much the result that matters in this case, but the fact that Iran decided to use that type of weapons. In other words, the step indicates a change in your strategy and your willingness to escalate the conflict. The jump to 4,000 km. Until now, Iran had defended that it limited the range of its missiles to about 2,000 kilometers, a range that covered the Middle East but left out Western Europe. However, the attempted attack suggests it can operate at much greater distances, close to 4,000 kilometers. That figure places cities within its potential radius, for example, like London or Paris. Also to a large extent from southern Europeincluding Spain in certain scenarios. The key is not whether you can do it accurately. The thing is that distance is no longer a clear limit. Diego Garcia How these missiles work. Ballistic missiles continue an arc path after being launched by a rocket. The larger the scope, the larger it should be rocket size and the technical problems are more complex. The reason: increased vibrations, heat on re-entry and navigation errors. There are “tricks”, for example, to gain distance weight can be reduced of the explosive charge, but that limits its destructive capacity. Additionally, accuracy worsens the longer the flight. Therefore, reaching a distant objective is not the same as doing so with real military effectiveness. More psychological than operational. The results of the attack itself they point to their limits. Only two missiles were launched, and one missed and the other was intercepted. This suggests, a priori, that Iran does not have of large quantities of this type of weaponry nor high reliability at these distances. Furthermore, Western defense systems are designed precisely to intercept this type of threats. In a real scenario, the missiles would be few, inaccurate and faced with advanced defenses. The military impact would be limited, while the political impact, on the other hand, would be much greater. Europe, with Spain, within the calculation. If you also want, the important change is not technical, but rather strategic. Until now, Europe viewed the conflict as something very distant. With this movement, enter of range calculationalthough the immediate risk is low, because being within the potential radius changes perception security. In that sense, Spain, due to its geographical position, is at the extreme of that theoretical scope. It is not an immediate objective, much less probable. But stop being off the map. And so, in strategic termsit is already a relevant change. The message in the middle of war. In short, everything indicates that the main objective of the launch It was not so much destroying the base, but send a signal. Demonstrate capacity, surprise your adversaries and increase international pressure. At a time when Iran is under severe military and economic pressure, showing that it can expand the conflict is a form of brutal deterrence. Also a message to the United States, to its allies and to all of Europe. And as in many phases of war, the psychological effect it may be even more important than the material result. Image | Ballistic Missile, Google Earth In Xataka | If the question is whether the US is going to invade Iran, the answer right now is 3,000 paratroopers on their way to the Gulf In Xataka | Iran has drones and ballistic missiles: Iran’s enemies apparently have the ability to steal its rains

In 1967, a war veteran believed that moving around a computer could be easier. So he created the first mouse

by

Things were clear from minute one. When Douglas Engelbarthead of the Augmentation Research Center (ARC), at Stanford, wanted to interview a new recruit, gave him a pencil attached to a brick and then asked him to write his name on a piece of paper. Difficult, right?, joked Engelbart, a doctor in electrical engineering and a pioneer in computer development. Well, people would encounter the same problems, he explained to the candidates, if they were not able to offer them more agile and simple tools to use computers. He wasn’t talking just to talk. Engelbart, together with one of his colleagues, also an engineer William Englishwas the father of the first mouse computer in the 1960s. Only that one was not called a mouse, but XY Position Indicator for a Display System; and its design was quite different from the modern peripherals that we use today. To begin with, it was made of wood and had a pair of metal wheels. This is your story. Make it easy for people: “Click” In the early 1960s, Engelbart, a World War II veteran, recent PhD and with just a couple of years of experience at the Stanford Research Institute —today known as SRI— had a clear idea: he wanted accessible technology. And simple. In 1945, while serving in the US Navy, he had read an article by the inventor Vannevar Bush who encouraged scientists to bring knowledge to the streets and he was determined to transfer that slogan to his own field. The golden opportunity came when the Department of Defense, through DARPAgave him the necessary support to set up his own center in the SRI, the ARC. There he had nearly fifty people working for him and efforts were focused on answering a question: What would the future of computer communication be like? At that time, computing had been in development for decades; IBM had manufactured the IBM 650 and the team was convinced of the enormous potential of the sector. The question was how to use it and prevent the systems from being as unwieldy as a pencil stuck to a brick. At that time the most popular devices for pointing on a screen were optical pencilsa system similar to that used in military radars. Since 1961 Engelbart, however, ruminated on an alternative. To make interaction with computers more efficient: install a pair of small wheels across a table so that the user could operate the screen cursor with them. One would rotate horizontally and the other vertically and its operation would be very similar to that of the planimeter commonly used by surveyors, geographers and architects. The idea had been recorded in his notebook, but already in the 1960s, with the financial backing of DARPA, his own team and extra help from NASAEngelbart was able to delve into it. The veteran and his colleagues gathered the best signaling equipment that existed and made a kind of brainstorming which left half a dozen proposals for working with monitors, some of the most curious, such as a joystick or a light pen. Perhaps the most striking of all was a mechanism that was fixed under the table and operated with the knee. A prototype nicknamed “mouse” Also included among that amalgam was a small device manufactured by Bill English after reviewing his notes from the beginning of the decade with Engelbart. The prototype basically consisted of a carved redwood block which included two wheels crimped at the bottom and a button at the top. Your name: XY Position Indicator for a Display System. Its appearance, compact and with a cable protruding, However, it ended up earning him the nickname “mouse.”. It was so comfortable that it prevailed over the rest of the laboratory’s alternatives and the team included it as a standard piece in their research. The SRI applied for the mouse patent in 1967 and received it in 1970. Engelbart and his companions did not stop there. They continued looking for a “companion” for the mouse, another device that the user could operate with their free hand and could use to enter commands and text. After several tests they opted for a device similar to a telephone with five keys. They also carried out tests to perfect the mouse design as much as possible. “We did a lot of experiments to see how many buttons it should have. We tried up to five. We decided on three. That’s all we could fit in. Now, the three-button mouse has become standard, except for the Mac,” Engelbart himself recalled in 2004, in an interview with Wired. With all this material and the rest of the inventions developed by his team, the war veteran decided to put on a gala performance. One like a beast. In 1968 they organized known as “mother of all demos”a historic conference held in San Francisco in which Engelbart showed all the functions they had developed over the last few years. “For 90 minutes, the stunned audience of more than a thousand professionals witnessed many of the features of modern computing for the first time: live video conferencing, document sharing, word processing, windows, and a strange pointing device jokingly referred to as “the mouse“The elements of the screen were linked to others through associative links or hypertexts,” explains the Computer History Museum. “People were amazed. In one hour, it defined the era of modern computing,” English commented to New York Times in 1996. Shortly after that historic achievement, however, the team began to lose its drive. Some staff questioned the lab’s drift, DARPA cut its funding, and other research centers began to emerge, such as the Xerox in Palo Alto (PARC). Result? Many of Engelbart’s employees sought new destinations. With them went the very concept of the mouse. The device, with a trackball, ended up being incorporated into the Xerox Alto computer and in 1983 Apple marketed it with its computer Lisa. After a while –as you remember Washington Post— Steve Jobs’ company was behind almost half of … Read more

That I do it right now is no coincidence

by

At the end of January SpaceX stopped settling for just being SpaceXand acquired—or would it be better to say “absorbed”?—xAI, the artificial intelligence company also founded by Elon Musk. That movement and the rise of both the space division and the AI ​​division have propelled joint valuation. And with that assessment there is increasingly more clues that the signature prepare now a spectacular IPO. The largest takeover bid in history. There is already talk that this public offering of shares (OPA, or IPO) could become the largest in history. Its current valuation is around $1.75 trillion, and the company seeks to raise about $75 billion with this IPO, a much higher figure than the previously estimated $50 billion. Dizzying figures. The record until now was held by Saudi Aramco, which at its IPO in 2019 raised $29.4 billion. If forecasts are met, SpaceX’s market capitalization (xAI included) could reach $1.5 trillion according to some analysts, 94 times what it raised in 2025. In The Information they go further and they affirm that the potential valuation could amount to the aforementioned 1.75 billion dollars. Exodus in xAI. The xAI acquisition came at a striking time: several of the company’s original co-founders have decided to leave in recent weeks. Elon Musk himself commented on the movements indicating that “xAI has been reorganized a few days ago to improve its execution speed.” Among those who have left are Tony Wu, Greg Yang and Jimmy Babut other members of the technical team They have also left the companyand that talent drain is not a good sign if we take into account that xAI does not seem to be competing with OpenAI or Anthropic in their segments. SpaceX’s pace of orbital launches is so astonishing that it already surpasses the rest of the world combined. Source: Space Stats. A treasure called reusable rockets. SpaceX, founded in 2002, is the largest private space company in the United States and already carries out more launches per year than any other company globally. The Falcon 9 reusable rockets and the Starship program They have transformed the aerospace industry, and have made the space race almost non-existent because no one can compete with SpaceX today. But space enthusiasm. The IPO occurs at a unique time for SpaceX, which has become an absolutely strategic company in several areas. Its growth in income (about 16,000 million in 2025, according to MorningStar) comes from the good performance of its business with Starlink, but things are not going to stop there: the reduction in the costs of launching and putting satellites into orbit is a goldmine, and even opens the doors to realizing Musk’s new objective of create spatial data centers. The world is in turmoil and SpaceX is doing great. We are also seeing how the war conflicts that are emerging everywhere are being used by SpaceX to “sell” Starlink as a much more interesting connectivity option —or disturbing, depending on how you look at it– when traditional communications fail. Cover image | Ministry of Communications | SpaceX In Xataka | Elon Musk knows that TSMC is overwhelmed: Terafab is his idea to completely change the global chip industry

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.