Month: May 2026

The mouse cursor has hardly changed for half a century. Google just tried to make that no longer the case

by

Google DeepMind has published the principles and demos of Magic Pointera mouse pointer powered by Gemini who understands what you are pointing out and why. Without writing anything. Just pointing. Why is it important. The chatbot as the main interface has been the dominant model in AI for two years: you open a window, write and you get a response. Magic Pointer proposes the opposite: the AI ​​moves with you around the screen, reads what is in front of you and acts without you explaining the context. If it works as promised, the text box is no longer the gateway to AI. The logic behind the project is that the problem with current AI is not its capacity, but the friction to use it. Every time you want to ask a model for something, you have to drag your world into it: open a window, paste text, explain the context from scratch, etc. Magic Pointer reverses that flow: the AI ​​goes where the cursor is. In detail. The system captures visual and semantic context around the pointer. You indicate a date in an email and Gemini suggests creating an event. You select two images, a sofa and your living room, and the model composes them. You hover over a table and you can request a graph without opening any more apps. The objective is to replace the prompts long by what DeepMind calls “natural shorthand”: point out something, say what you want, and have the system fill in the gaps. There are live demos at Google AI Studio and the system now reaches Chrome. In autumn it will land in Googlebookthe new Google laptop with Acer, Asus, Dell, HP and Lenovo as manufacturers. Between the lines. We are looking at three ways to put AI in a computer: Apple integrates it within each application. Microsoft puts Copilot on a side panel. Google puts Gemini inside the pointing device itself: it is not in the background, it is the cursor, it is the widgetis the interface between the user and the machine. That last one is a philosophical bet. And it has implications for the chatbot model: if the cursor acts as a contextual agent, the chat window loses its monopoly as an entry point. Yes, but. Googlebook arrives in autumn as a premium product, with no announced price yet. The Android ecosystem on the desktop remains the weak flank: if developers do not build native apps for the big screen, the Magic Pointer points to a world that does not yet exist. And in any market where Gemini is restricted by regulations, the entire proposition becomes empty. In Xataka | The AI ​​industry already knows how to make more money. Just use the fear strategy Featured image | Google

The US believed it had crushed Iran’s missile city. They have counted the complexes again, and it is as if they had shot in the air

by

During the Gulf War, several American pilots returned convinced they had completely destroyed numerous Iraqi underground shelters. Days later, reconnaissance images revealed something disconcerting: Many of those complexes were still active because the explosions had barely blocked secondary entrances while the main infrastructure remained intact under tons of rock and concrete. The big surprise. For weeks, the White House presented the campaign against Iran as a crushing demonstration of modern military power: stealth bombers, precision missiles and coordinated attacks with Israel that had supposedly left the Iranian strategic network reduced to rubble. donald trump came to affirm that Tehran already “had nothing” in military terms and that its missiles had been dispersed and out of combat. However, the new secret evaluations US intelligence agencies describe a radically different and deeply uncomfortable scenario for Washington. After reanalyzing satellite images, underground access and logistical activity, American analysts discovered that Iran maintains operational 30 of its 33 complexes of missiles in the Strait of Hormuz and retains a good part of its mobile launchers and arsenals, in addition to having recovered the 90% access of its underground facilities. The feeling within some national security sectors is beginning to be disturbing: after spending thousands of missiles and selling the world the idea of ​​total destruction, the immense Iranian “missile city” remains practically where it was at the beginning. Architecture of a fortress. Here you have to remember something what do we count weeks ago. The real problem for the United States is not just how many missiles Iran retains, but how they were built and distributed their complexes for decades. Tehran turned entire mountains into underground defensive systemswith tunnels, protected warehouses, redundant access and mobile platforms capable of moving missiles from one point to another even after a bombing. Many installations were not designed to resist a specific attack, but to ensure that they always there will be something operational after any initial wave. That’s where the intelligence reports are causing real concern: Many of the entrances were temporarily sealed, but not completely destroyed, and the vast majority of the complexes they regained access operational in a matter of weeks. In some cases, the Iranians may even continue to launch missiles directly from the facilities themselves. The result is a very different image from the American public narrative: rather than eliminating the threat, Washington seems to have scratched the surface of an infrastructure conceived precisely to survive a war of technological attrition. The hidden price of the operation. The other great revelation of the conflict is not underground in Iran, but inside the own US arsenals. The campaign consumed gigantic amounts of advanced ammunition: more than a thousand stealth cruise missiles, around a thousand Tomahawks and more than 1,300 Patriot interceptors, figures that are equivalent to entire years of industrial production. The Pentagon attempted to balance two incompatible priorities: destroying extremely hardened Iranian complexes and, at the same time, do not empty completely its strategic reserves in the face of possible future crises with China or North Korea. This limitation explains part of the most controversial tactical decisions of the war. Rather spray completely many underground complexes, planners opted to seal access and entrances using fewer bunker buster bombs than necessary to destroy the entire facility. Now the consequences are beginning to appear starkly: it spent enormous amounts of high-end weapons, but the Iranian network continues to retain significant operational capacity. Hormuz as center of gravity. All of this takes on an even more delicate dimension due to where most of Iran’s surviving capacity is concentrated: the Strait of Hormuz. Approximately a fifth of the world’s oil circulates through that maritime strip, and US intelligence believes that Iran maintains enough missiles and launchers there to to continue threatening warships, oil tankers and critical infrastructure. The US Navy maintains a practically continuous presence in the area with more than twenty ships patrolling and holding the blockade, but the strategic reality is beginning to become uncomfortable: even after a gigantic military campaign, Washington has not been able to eliminate Iran’s ability to turn Hormuz into a nightmare for global trade. There is no doubt, this persistence completely alters the initial perception of the war. What seemed like a demonstration of technological supremacy is also beginning to look like a warning about the real limits of modern air power against deeply dispersed underground networks. The political contradiction. Ultimately, the conclusions of the intelligence “count” They are also opening an increasingly visible political rift in Washington. While the White House publicly insists that the operation was a historic success and accuses those who question that story of “virtual betrayal,” internal reports describe a enemy far away of being neutralized. And the contradiction threatens to become both a strategic and political problem. If the ceasefire collapses, Trump would have to decide between accepting that Iran retains a relevant military capability or relaunching an even more costly campaign using ammunition reserves that will most likely take years to recover. The dilemma is especially delicate because European allies They already fear delays in arms deliveries destined for Ukraine due to American industrial wear. The war against Iran was designed to demonstrate strength and restore deterrence, but what is beginning to emerge, however, is another, much more uncomfortable reading: that even the most powerful military machine on the planet may discover too late that destroying a “missile city” buried under mountains is much more difficult than announcing its destruction on television. Image | Iranian Media In Xataka | Suddenly, a military outpost sprouted up in the Iraq desert: it was Israel in its bombing campaign of Iran In Xataka | While everyone was looking at Hormuz, Russia has found a much more important route to supply drones to Iran

After the Titan millionaire submarine disaster, China plans to take more rich tourists 1,000 meters under the sea

by

The depths ofto Mariana Trench or exploration from the deep ocean It has always been a thing for scientists and remotely controlled machines. China wants it to stop being so and already has an ambitious plan in motion: taking wealthy tourists to 1,000 meters deep, where sunlight does not reach and where there is no turning back for an engineering failure. The project comes three years after the Titan tragedythe OceanGate submersible that imploded in June 2023 while I was visiting the remains of the titanic in which its five occupants died. Far from stopping its efforts, China is moving forward with a proposal that, unlike the Titan, is backed by decades of naval engineering developed with the support of China. Four highly sought-after seats. Ye Cong, director of the China Naval Scientific Research Center, counted to ChinaDaily that “after more than four years of research, engineers have finalized the structural design” and that, once the prototype is built, “they will carry out sea trials and then improve the design based on the results.” The submersible will have enough space to accommodate four peoplepilot included, so, to begin with, the availability of places is very limited. This shortage of vacancies is expected to contribute to skyrocketing prices for filling each seat. One of the most complex problems of the small submarine has already been solved: the panoramic viewfinder. Your designers they describe it as “one of the most difficult structural codes to decipher on a deep-sea submersible.” And it makes sense since at 1,000 meters deep the pressure is about 100 times greater than on the surface, and that window has to withstand it without giving way. An unprecedented leap into the abyss. This is not the first submersible that Chinese engineers have operated. However, such andhow do they count in South China Morning Post The new projects that are being tested far exceed the depths at which current submersibles operate, which do not go below 20 meters deep. They are used for lakes, reservoirs and shallow coasts, so going from there to 1,000 meters is multiplying the operating depth by 50. The same naval engineering center that is now building this new generation of manned mini-submarines already built The Huandao Jiaolong 1 and 2, two tourist submersibles with capacity for seven passengers and a limit of 40 meters. However, on that occasion, immersion operations were suspended due to regulatory restrictions, but everything learned then has been applied to the new design. China plunges into the field of underwater exploration. The West has been designing submersibles for decades for deep dives. Companies like Deep RoverTriton and U-Boat Worx have been manufacturing submersibles over 1,000 meters since 1985 and until now had no Chinese competition in that segment. The new project developed by the China Naval Scientific Research Center changes that scenario supported by the previous experience of the Jiaolongthe Deep Sea Warrior and the Fendouzhe, three ships that last year completed more than 300 dives around the world and accounted for more than 50% of all manned deep-sea expeditions on a global scale. Ye Cong assured the Chinese news agency that the submersible: “will be a valuable asset for cruise lines, high-end tour operators and oceanographic researchers. It will offer the most demanding travelers an unforgettable experience in ocean exploration.” The prototype should be ready before the end of 2026, with the commercial debut expected before 2030. Much more than a tourist “toy”: it is a key strategy. This submersible is not just a mere product intended for tourist use of millionaires with adventurous concerns. It is part of China’s strategy to become strong in the blue economy, the sector of economic activities linked to the sea, a developing sector in which China seeks to play a leading role in the future. The Asian giant already leads manned deep-sea exploration and wants that this technological advantage is amortized in the form of a private business for their companies. After the Titan catastrophea good part of the luxury underwater tourism industry came to a screeching halt. China is the first to step on the accelerator again in this area, and this project is supported by State resources, which gives it a considerable advantage over projects that, like the Titan, are developed with private funds and investors. In Xataka | There is a new chapter in the Titan submarine tragedy: the memory card of its camera survived the implosion Image | CSSC

list with a summary of everything that will arrive in this version of the operating system

by

We bring you the list with all the news that will come to Android 17which Google has announced in its official presentation. Almost all the focus of the news Gemini Intelligence takes itbut there are also many that are worth knowing, and that will improve the Android experience, although there is also bad news. We are going to make this text summarized so that you have a complete and easy-to-read list. We will show you one by one all the news summarizing what each one of them is about. Remember that these are the basic new features of Android 17, and that later each manufacturer will be able to implement their own. What’s new in Android 17 Gemini Intelligence: Google wants to turn its AI into a proactive agent, and it does so with this function that will arrive first on Pixel and Samsung Galaxy phones. It will allow Gemini to interact with your apps to perform complex, multi-step tasks in the background, such as organizing an itinerary or managing orders. All this without you having to do anything manually through the menus. Gemini will also integrate into Chrome to help you research, summarize information, share content, or even book appointments or parking spaces, as well as fill out more fields in apps and web pages. Task automation: Another Gemini Intelligence brick to use with food delivery apps, transportation, and more. Can you imagine being able to order your purchase online from a shopping list saved in your notes or a photograph? Well this will be possible. rambler: Another Gemini Intelligence feature, this time for the Gboard keyboard. It is a function that allows you to convert voice messages into text, being able to transcribe, eliminate repetitions, hesitations and organize sentences. AirDrop support– Quick Share becomes AirDrop compatible for everyone. This is something that the Pixel and Galaxy could already do, and now it will be expanded to everyone this year. You can make your Android phone send files to iPhone or Mac with AirDroid and vice versa. Less freedom to install APKs: Android is going to be less free, and you won’t be able to install any apps outside of the app store. Google will require developers to verify their identity so that their APK files can be installed, even if you download them from outside the app store. This is very bad news for third-party free app stores where you can install alternative apps. Pause Point: This is an option that tries to help you avoid opening apps almost automatically. Do not block access, but rather place a short pause before entering applications that you mark as distracting, such as Instagram, other social networks, or whatever you choose. Material 3 Expressive: The design language that debuted with Android 16 evolves with semi-transparency and blur effects, visible in elements such as the volume bar or the quick settings center. System icons are also improved for more cohesion with background accent colors, and more customization. WiFi and data controls: Another change is that the WiFi and mobile data controls are finally separated again in the quick settings. Custom widgets: You will be able to create custom widgets without having to design them by hand. Android will use Gemini Intelligence to build widgets for your home screen from natural language instructions. Android optimization: The Android kernel will be able to learn from the execution profiles of apps to reduce interface jerks and improve opening speed. More security: The security of the system is also reinforced, with small improvements to avoid fraudulent calls and bank scams, or detect applications that behave suspiciously. Malware detection is also improved. On-screen reactions: A wink for those who record themselves commenting on what appears on your screen. You can record a video in which what you see on your screen and your face appear at the same time with the front camera. Gaming improvements: Added support for remapping Xbox or PlayStation controller buttons. A new virtual controller function is also added that translates touches on the screen into physical signals. With this, you will be able to use controllers designed only for touch controls in your games. Universal clipboard: Finally you will be able to copy and paste content between mobile, PC and vice versa, just as Apple allows you to do it between its devices. RAM limits per app: Android will set memory caps based on device RAM. If an application tries to consume too much, Android will close it to avoid crashes and the fluidity of the operating system from being affected. OTP Security: This new security measure is added to avoid banking scams. With it, there will be a three-hour delay in accessing SMS with verification codes for third-party applications. Android Auto: Total redesign of Android Auto to completely move to the Material 3 Expressive design language. Migration from iPhone: Migration from an iPhone to Android is improved, with support for migrating messages, contacts, eSIM or the home screen. New emojis: Google has redesigned the 4,000 Android emojis to give them a slightly more three-dimensional look, with more depth and detail than the flatter, more cartoonish versions they replace. Android 17 availability Google has not specified a specific release date for Android 17. However, It is expected to arrive during next June on Pixel 6 onwards. And from there, it will be up to each manufacturer to implement it in their respective customization layers. Another thing to keep in mind is that some of the features may come later. Google has presented Android 17 as an update with many pieces, and some will have staggered rollouts. Screen reactions will arrive in summer, new emojis later, widget creation functions in summer, and others such as migration from iPhone or AirDrop compatibility later this year. In Xataka | Google wants to leave behind the greatest limit of Chromebooks: its recipe mixes Android, Gemini and premium design

Claude, Gemini and ChatGPT are not supposed to be used in China. It is supposed

by

In China there is what is popularly known as the “Great Firewall”a large security wall that prevents its citizens from accessing certain services. At the same time, there are foreign companies that block their services in China, this is what is happening with AI tools like ChatGPTbut the law is made, the trap is made. Gray market. They tell it in South China Morning Postthere is a whole flourishing market of services that promise to provide access to American AI models, such as Claude or Gemini, avoiding the restrictions imposed on both sides of their borders. On online sales platforms such as Taobao or Xianyu, unlimited subscriptions to Claude Code, Gemini and ChatGPT are sold with low latency and without VPN. These platforms have become a solution for Chinese developers who want to access American models to program, debug or use multimedia generation services. How they do it. Access is done through what is known as ‘shadow APIs’ which, in essence, is an intermediary. What they do is set up proxy servers outside of China and divert all user requests there, so that those external servers are the ones that actually call the official APIs of models like Claude or Gemini and then return the “masked” response as if it were a local service, without the need for a VPN or foreign payment methods. It pays for them. According to the developers cited in the South China Morning Post piece, they resort to these ‘shadow APIs’ because they simply consider them to be tools that are clearly superior to the local offering. This translates into more precise code, fewer hallucinations and less time correcting bugs than with Chinese models which, according to what they say, still invent functionalities or fail more often. In addition, these services give them almost complete access to models like Claude Opus or Gemini, with huge context windows (up to a million tokens), without having to fight with VPNs or foreign payment methods. Wiles. All that glitters is not gold and there are also advertisements that do not fulfill what they promise. Some of these services advertise full access to models like Claude, but are actually processing requests with cheaper Chinese models like Qwen or MiniMax. Additionally, there is the risk to privacy as all traffic goes through an anonymous intermediary who could do whatever they wanted with often sensitive data. Frontier Model Forum. Is a coalition formed by several AI companies dedicated to the security and regulation of border models, but in practice it is functioning more as an intellectual property defense mechanism. Recently OpenAI, Anthropic and Google announced that they were working together to curb copying of their models by coordinating the sharing of suspicious usage patterns and distillation attack detection techniques through this common forum. Image | Xataka In Xataka | The center of gravity of mobile photography has moved to China and OPPO is going for the throne with the Find X9 Ultra

The lungs have an incredible capacity to regenerate after quitting tobacco. But time plays against

by

Smoking is not healthy at all and even less for our lungs, which are severely affected in their structure by the harmful damage of the tobacco or at the end of any substance other than oxygen. This is something that is quite well internalized, but the other reality is that when we quit tobacco we can recover some of what we lost due to its great capacity for regeneration driven by healthy cells that replace damaged ones. There is evidence. The great turning point in our understanding of this phenomenon came with a pioneering study published in Nature in 2020, where they analyzed the cells that line our bronchi among smokers, ex-smokers and people who have never touched a cigarette. Here what they found was fascinating, since they saw that in the lungs of smokers there were a large number of cells that were mutated and could be the prelude to lung cancer. However, upon quitting this bad habit, a group of non-mutated cells genetically similar to those of non-smokers began to proliferate rapidly. It’s good news. So, at this moment the healthy cells, which had remained “hidden” or protected from the smoke, begin to multiply to replace the damaged ones that end up dying to prevent them from developing cancer. Here the study pointed out that up to 40% of lung cells in ex-smokers are these new replacement cells, and most importantly, this repair process occurs even in people who have smoked a pack a day for 40 years, which is a lot. That is why this is the explanation we find for the plummeting risk of lung cancer after quitting smoking, although it is not logically eliminated. The chronology. Regeneration is not only genetic, but it is also mechanical and functional, and we see it clearly in the different events that occur when tobacco is stopped. For example, in the first 24 hours There is a normalization of carbon monoxide levels in the blood and the effect on respiratory capacity or even blood pressure is noticeable. In subsequent weeks, tissue recovery and regeneration of cilia begins, which are small “brooms” in the lungs to expel the mucus that accumulates upward, drastically reducing respiratory infections. But if we go to the first year, we see how lung capacity experiences a measurable improvement in a spirometry. You have to be cautious. Despite the good news, experts and companies like SEPAR they are prudent by pointing out that lung regeneration is partial, not total. This means that the lung is not exactly that of a newborn, and there are structural damages that are irreversible. Diseases such as emphysema or advanced fibrosis persist, since the tissue destroyed at these levels cannot regenerate. Likewise, in the case of COPD, quitting smoking significantly stops or slows down the progression of the disease, but does not cure the severe obstructive damage already established. Age influences. The regeneration capacity also decreases with age and with the years accumulated as a smoker. Healthy cells end up dominating the epithelium after years of abstinence, but there are always residual risks that do not disappear. This should make us aware of how important it is to stop smoking as soon as possible so that we can have much fewer chances of having a serious disease in our lung, such as cancer. Images | wirestock at Magnific In Xataka | Beyond tobacco: we have just discovered that diet can also affect the risk of developing lung cancer

This is the new Xiaomi pack that costs just over 750 euros

by

From time to time Xiaomi launches the odd pack that brings together several of its devices, and normally these packs are usually on sale. This week the brand has returned to the fray, launching one of the best combos we have seen to date: it includes two televisions and a Bluetooth speaker for a price of 769 euros. This is what the pack includes: Xiaomi TV F Pro 2026 (32 inches) Xiaomi TV F Pro 2026 (75 inches) Xiaomi Bluetooth Speaker. Xiaomi TV F Pro 2026 (75 inches) + Xiaomi TV F Pro 2026 (32 inches) + Xiaomi Bluetooth Speaker The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Two TVs and a Bluetooth speaker The 32 and 75-inch Xiaomi televisions are from the “F” line, which means that they are essentially the “A Pro”, but with the Fire TV operating system instead of Google TV. In this way, they have Alexa integrated and the menu is the same as what we find in the Fire TV Stick from Amazon. Both televisions offer 4K resolution and are compatible with the image format HDR10+. It incorporates a panel with QLED technology and its refresh rate reaches 120 Hz in Game Boost mode via HDMI, which are two ideal features if you are looking for a television for gaming. In addition, its speakers are compatible with Dolby Audio and it has a reduced blue light mode to protect eyesight. On the other hand, the Xiaomi Bluetooth Speaker It is not a speaker that is intended for use with the television, but with other devices such as smartphones. It stands out mainly for having Harman AudioEFX audio software, it is resistant to both water and dust (IP67) and its theoretical autonomy reaches 17 hours of use. ⚡ IN SUMMARY: Xiaomi pack offer today ✅ THE BEST 3 x 1: We are talking about a pack that includes three devices, the most interesting being the TVs. The TVs: The two TVs have a QLED panel, and one of them has a 75-inch diagonal. ❌ THE WORST The Bluetooth speaker: As it is a pack with two televisions, it is missing that instead of a speaker it included a sound bar to make the pack more rounded. 💡 BUY IT IF… You want to renew a couple of televisions, whether for the living room and kitchen, bedroom or a second residence. In addition, they are especially interesting for their gaming-oriented features. ⛔ DON’T BUY IT IF… You only need a television or are you looking for a different experience than what QLED televisions offer, which are more oriented toward gaming and not so much toward sports or movies. You may also be interested Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Plus, compatible with Wi-Fi 6, Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos and HDR10+ The price could vary. We earn commission from these links XIAOMI Soundbar Pro 2.1ch-300W TV Sound Bar with Powerful Bass and External Wireless Subwoofer. Compatible with Dolby Audio™ and DTS Virtual:X. HDMI ARC/Optical/Coaxial/Bluetooth Connections The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Xiaomi In Xataka | Best home theater projectors. Which one to buy and five recommended models from 299 to 18,000 euros In Xataka | Mega-guide to set up a home theater: projector, screen, sound system and more

It’s an epidemic of blue spots

by

On typical Ticketmaster concert ticketing maps, sold seats in the stands are displayed in gray. Those available, in blue. When there are too many blue dots, artists start making excuses: medical problems, family commitments, unfinished albums. But in 2026, those excuses have already been heard too many times. So much so that the press has already given a name to this epidemic. Blue dot fever. “Blue dot fever” is the term that has circulated on networks and specialized media to describe an unusual wave of tour cancellations in recent months. Literally: on Ticketmaster concert seating maps, where there should be gray what you see is blue like the blue sea. And this debacle has had a previous symptom: at least ten top-level artists have canceled or postponed dates so far this year, with Live Nation/Ticketmaster productions taking up much of the list. Who canceled? The names are well known in the United States: Post Malone and Jelly Roll delayed a third of their joint stadium tour. Meghan Trainor canceled her entire Get In Girl Tour in the country, citing a desire to spend more time with her family after having her third child. Zayn did the same with his dates in North American venues, although he kept those in the United Kingdom (we discuss the importance of that detail below), citing unspecified health reasons. Those who do not hide. There are more honest ones, and we can pull on that thread. The Pussycat Dolls They canceled 32 of their 33 dates in North America “after making an honest analysis” of the results of his tour. They didn’t talk about sales, but it’s not necessary either. Rapper Kid Cudi was the only one who spoke bluntly: upon canceling his date in Birmingham, Alabama, he posted on Instagram: “I wanted to give you a special experience, but ticket sales haven’t been strong enough.” The reasons. The average price of a concert ticket in the United States has passed from 82 dollars in 2020 to 144 dollars in 2026. And to that we must add transportation, parking, food and drink within the venue and, in many cases, accommodation. A Post Malone fan explained why didn’t you go see him: “The prices are crazy. I love it, but I’m not going to pay $400 to see it from afar.” Regular tickets for the cheapest leg of his stadium tour cost between $231 and $346. More expensive if it is better. In fact, not all tickets have increased in price in the same proportion. As detectedthe prices of the cheapest tickets have remained relatively stable, while those of the premium zones have skyrocketed. That partly explains why the Pussycat Dolls’ Ticketmaster website showed almost 80% of their seats unsold even after cutting prices to $30. Behind the climbs. Blaming high prices is staying on the surface. In reality, the market has become saturated. The money that many fans kept during confinement was spent on the 2022 and 2023 concerts, and there was still enough left over for the Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour and the meeting of Oasis. In 2026, the pockets are empty. In that same article, an analyst states that “there is a kind of return to reality, and that clashes with the inflation and the increase in fuel prices that we see in the general economy.” Of course, the price of gasoline, skyrocketed by the conflict in Iraq, has made the logistics of the tours more expensive… and depleted the budget of the attendees. Added to this is the competence of 2026 Soccer World Cupwhich takes place in North America and will absorb a significant portion of leisure spending during the summer. Too many artists They have overestimated the demand after seeing the results of previous megatours. Hold on Europe. Although it is a more or less globalized crisis and has reached artists from countries like Mexico, where Los Ángeles Azules, Ximena Sariñana or Natalia Lacunza have canceled or postponed dates, the truth is that we are talking almost exclusively about America. In Europe the concert bubble keeps growingperhaps because the stadium tour model is more intrinsically North American, and in Europe we are not as dependent on the exclusivity of that style. It’s Live Nation. The paradox: Live Nation, the company that dominates ticket sales in the United States (about 80% of the market), published results of first quarter of 2026 with revenue 12% higher than the previous year and advance ticket sales 22% higher. So, is Blue Dot Fever a mirage? Rather it is a warning, as are also dynamic prices that doubled the cost of Bad Bunny’s tickets in Spain in minutes, internal messages from Live Nation managers describing their own clients as “idiots” from those who are “stealing with full hands” or the debate about whether macro concerts are devouring to the rest of the music market. Blue Dot Fever is the warning that the climb cannot be infinite, and with all the cards in one hand, disaster may be just around the corner. No matter how good the quarterly financial results look. In Xataka | Gustavo Cerati died in 2014. That has not prevented him from appearing at the last Soda Stereo concert

Vigo already has its “direct” AVE to Madrid without stops in Castilla y León. Now it takes longer than before

by

A little over a year ago, controversy arose between autonomous communities. Abel Caballero, mayor of Vigo, claimed that one of the reasons why the AVE to Madrid did not take the promised time was due to “an excessive number of stops in the Castilla y León area.” The response was not long in coming. Now, the people of Vigo have their “direct” train to Madrid, without stops in this autonomous community. The problem: they come out earlier and take longer than before. 215 minutes. That is the promise with which the railway link between Vigo and Madrid was announced. Yes, you read correctly: three hours and 35 minutes. Since high speed was launched in this corridor, the trains that have approached the promise that Óscar Puente put on the table in 2024 have been an exception. Instead, the trains have taken at least four hours. In the best of cases, barely a minute has been cut from the journey, but in practice they continue to move on the psychological border of 240 minutes. As long as there is no delay. And in the Galician corridor they know well what we are talking about. Too many stops. Given the impossibility of fulfilling that promise, Abel Caballero, mayor of Vigo, proposed a simple formula: that the trains not stop in Castilla y León. He did not say anything about Galicia because, in his opinion, it was the arrests in the neighboring autonomous community where the most time was wasted. “The current travel time on some of the routes is very long due to an excessive number of stops in the area of ​​Castilla y León, an area already close to Madrid that currently has a very important coverage of trains coming from all over the north and the rest of Galicia on high-speed routes” The words were picked up in the local media Atlantic.net and, according to Caballero, they were well received by Álvaro Fernández Heredia, president of Renfe since where they quickly denied this possibility. The proposal collided head-on with Alfonso Fernández Mañueco, president of Castilla-León, who in words reported by The Spanish He described Caballero’s words as “intolerable.” Vigo-Madrid route starting May 20 “Straight”. So, in quotes. Because starting May 20, Renfe will have an AVE without stops between Vigo and Madrid. The long-awaited Galician demand has been heard. As you see in the image above, from that day on the train from Vigo will leave at 5:50 a.m. and arrive in Madrid at 9:55 a.m. Once it leaves Vigo, the train will stop only in Galician cities. Once we have passed Ourense, the train will not stop until it reaches the Chamartín station in Madrid. It is, finally, the “direct” AVE that the people of Vigo demanded to be able to travel back and forth to Madrid in the shortest time possible. Vigo-Madrid route until May 19 Sure? And, contrary to what logic says, Vigo-Madrid takes longer than before. And, in addition, it will force passengers to get up earlier. And until that day, the first train that connects Vigo with the capital will continue to stop in Zamora but its journey will take eight minutes less. In addition, it leaves at 6:00 a.m., instead of 5:50 a.m. The reason is that, with the reorganization devised by Renfe, the first train has to stop in Santiago de Compostela, which has been omitted until now. And the residents of Ourense do not see a great reduction in times either, since it will only take four minutes less to reach Madrid despite not stopping in the Castilian-Leonese city. To make matters worse, the residents of Pontevedra will not find a substantial advantage either. In fact, they will now take eight minutes longer than before the last change. Now, with the latest changes, all trains leaving in Vigo and arriving in Madrid will take more than four hours. Adif, in the spotlight. Part of these “delays”, they point out from Vigo Lighthouseare due to the works that are being carried out in the Guadarrama tunnel at the entrance to Madrid. These add seven minutes to the final amount but as they point out from The Region There are numerous temporary speed limitations on the Galician section that hinder the promises of connecting Vigo and Madrid in half an hour less. He Vigo Lighthouse He also points out that Renfe has been complaining for some time about Adif’s management of the roads. According to the Galician media, the operator has requested on several occasions that some crossings between trains be relocated so that they are not on the single track sections. And the passage times have not been updated either, so, they point out, the current speed cannot be increased either. An exception. Since the Galician high-speed corridor began to operate at full capacity thanks to the use of the Talgo Avril that can change track gauge, doubts about the reliability and performance of these trains have been on the table. First for its disastrous arrivalthen for their problems with the change of year in 2025 and finally due to the cracks that appeared in these trains on the Madrid-Barcelona. However, the trains have proven capable of operating at full capacity and getting closer to the famous 215 minutes promised between Vigo and Madrid. Last November, A Renfe AVE managed to cover the journey in 217 minutes. The problem is that it only served to alleviate the delay accumulated at the origin. Being the last service and with the tracks already clear along the entire route, the Avril was able to travel at maximum speed for as long as possible. Photo | André Marques In Xataka | Renfe has found a scapegoat for its problems on the Madrid-Barcelona line: Talgo and its AVRIL trains

Before it was vibecoding, now it is cybersecurity

by

Claude Mythos Preview has turned upside down the AI ​​segment. Anthropic’s new model is so powerful that its creators have preferred not to release it publicly. In their official announcement they already made it clear: it is capable of finding security vulnerabilities that seemed almost impossible to findand that has allowed Anthropic to pose a disturbing message: if you want your system to be truly secure, you’re going to need Mythos to guarantee it. From vibecoding to cybersecurity. This has caused a wave of interest in a model that is no longer good because it programs better: it is good because it makes (theoretically) your application or your service safe from cyberattackers. That is critical especially in these times, and the first ones who are trying to cover their backs are governments and financial institutions. At the moment only a few have access to Mythos, and for example the European Central Bank already preparing contingency plans. Before, AI conquered us with vibecoding. Now he will conquer us by saving our savings. OpenAI moves not a token… Anthropic’s speech has been so powerful that OpenAI did not want to be left behind. As soon as it launched its latest model, GPT-5.5, a few days agoalready mentioned that it had a variant called GPT-5.5-Cyber ​​specifically intended for cybersecurity analysis. Here the company led by Sam Altman wanted to turn its model into a more accessible option for all types of organizations and companies, and opened a certified access program, something that Anthropic does not seem to have. Altman himself had described the movement as Anthropic as a marketing ploy…and then end up copying that same strategy of fear. …but two. Not happy with this move, OpenAI launched yesterday afternoon Daybreak. This is not a new AI model that competes with Mythos, but rather a cybersecurity initiative that combines AI models such as GPT-5.5-Cyber ​​with the agent specialized in this area, Codex Security. OpenAI has restricted access in a similar way to how Anthropic has done with Mythos, but does allow you to request a security scan in addition to contacting their sales team. There are already several organizations with access (Akamai, Cisco, Cloudflare or Oracle, among others), but it is ironic that once again Altman criticized his rival and then copied his ideas not once, but twice. That, after all, is a marketing strategy to sell its AI solutions focusing on cybersecurity. Google is not going to be less. A report from the Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) further encouraged the matter yesterday. The firm’s cybersecurity experts they stood out how they had managed to first detect and then stop an exploit developed entirely with AI. In this case, Google has not announced any model or initiative that rivals those of its competitors, but it does add to an increasingly frequent message: AI is going to be the next great cybersecurity threat. The 90-day window does not lose meaning. Some cybersecurity experts are already warning of the implications of this entire phenomenon. Himanshu Anand explained this week how what is starting to make no sense is the well-known 90-day disclosure policy. According to her, when someone discovers a vulnerability in an app, the app’s developer must have a margin of 90 days to create and distribute the patch. As he explained, “When ten researchers who don’t know each other find the same bug in six weeks, and the AI ​​is able to turn that into a working exploit in 30 minutes, who exactly is that 90-day period protecting? Nobody.” Mythos is not perfect. And while the big players in the segment are gaining positions, Mythos has shown that it is not perfect. The developer of the famous tool curlDaniel Stenberg, also told this week how you were able to use Mythos to analyze your source code. Curl programmed in C, has 176,000 lines of code and 660,000 words, 12% more than the English edition of the novel ‘War and Peace’. This is a hugely mature and very well-managed project, and so it was especially interesting to see if Mythos would manage to find many security flaws. And it may not be that bad. Anthropic’s model claimed to have found five confirmed security flaws, but after analysis with his team, Stenberg made it clear that it had actually only found one. And one with “low severity” not too dangerous. Of the rest, three were false positives, and the fourth was an unimportant “bug”, not a security flaw. For Stenberg Mythos does not seem much more advanced than other tools of this type that he has used in the past: “this model may be a little better, but even if it is, it is not better to a degree that could have a big impact on code analysis.” Even so, this developer praised the new AI tools for code analysis, which he believes are significantly better than traditional tools for this task. In Xataka | The hype for Claude Mythos is beginning to be justified: Firefox found and fixed more security flaws in one month than in the previous 15 months

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.