Anthropic was the “don’t be evil” of AI for developers. Now he’s squeezing them all

Claude Code and Claude Opus 4.6 sparked a golden era for developers, who found themselves with a fantastic AI agent and model for their work. Suddenly OpenAI was no longer the trendy company: Anthropic was, which users and developers fell in love and became in the pretty girl of AI. Months later we are seeing how Anthropic is making changes that are being highly criticized and that point to something that we have already seen repeatedly: platforms conquer you and inevitably then the platforms squeeze you. The trigger. On April 2, 2026, Stella Laurenzo, Senior Director in AMD’s AI group, published a text in Claude Code’s GitHub repository titled “Claude Code is useless for complex engineering tasks with February updates.” This directive included a meticulous analysis of almost 6,600 real Claude Code sessions with nearly 235,000 tool calls and about 18,000 reasoning blocks in four different projects. The conclusions were obvious to her: the performance of Claude Code and Claude Opus 4.6 had degraded. The numbers. In this analysis, two periods are shown according to Laurenzo. In the good period, from January to mid-February, the model read 6.6 files for every file it edited. In the theoretically degraded period, from March onwards, that rate had fallen to 2.0 files read. Code edits in files that Claude had not recently reviewed went from 6.2% to 33.7%: one in three changes to the code were being made “blindly.” In addition, the visibility of the reasoning was reduced, from 2,200 characters to only 600 on average, but there is something more. The costs of the process multiplied by 122 in the same period, although it is true that in that period they went from using 1-3 concurrent agents to using 5-10, which complicates the interpretation of the data. Anthropic tries to clarify what happened. Anthropic’s official response It was published by Boris Chernyresponsible for Claude Code. This engineer confirmed two actual product changes: On February 9, Opus 4.6 switched to using so-called “adaptive reasoning” by default. On March 3, the default effort level moved from high to medium, sitting at level 85, which Anthropic describes as “the best balance of intelligence, latency, and cost for most users.” Closed debate. Cherny also spoke of that suspicion that Claude was now hiding “how he thought.” He explained that the change in visible reasoning records is not a real degradation, and the detected header was simply a user interface modification that hid intermediate reasoning to reduce latency without affecting model performance. Laurenzo herself had already foreseen something like this and tried to implement solutions to avoid it, but her data confirmed this drop in performance. Cherny closed the debate as if the issue had been resolved, but it doesn’t seem like it really is. Computing capacity crisis. Thariq Shihipar of Claude Code’s team revealed in March that Anthropic was adjusting session limits to 5 hours during peak hours. That is to say: if there was a lot of demand, your Claude tokens would probably run out faster. He pointed out that the measure would actually only be noticed by 7% of users (the most intensive during those peak hours), and confessed “I know this is frustrating. We will continue to invest in scaling efficiency.” This is contradicted by a comment in the debate on Laurenzo’s post in which explained that “we do not degrade our models to better serve demand, I have said this many times before.” More degradations. They appeared other discoveries and criticismssuch as how Claude Code’s prompt cache had also been drastically reduced (from one hour to five minutes), triggering quota consumption in long programming sessions. Anthropic he indicated to VentureBeat that Team and Enterprise accounts are not affected by these session limits, but the pattern seems increasingly clear: computing is scarce and must be rationed… or at least that is what all these Anthropic measures seem to point to. What remains unclear is whether the quality of the model has actually been degraded, although there are Reddit “megathreads” that also point in that direction. “Nerfing”, nothing. When a company deliberately degrades its service, it is often called “nerfing.” on social networksand criticism in this sense was increasing in the case of Anthropic. Numerous publications of users in X and in media of technology have done reference to Laurenzo’s studio and accused Anthropic of this voluntary degradation of its models. Boris Cherny intervened in at least one case to flatly say that “That’s false” and to explain that they reported the changes and in fact gave users the option to disable it. But rationing exists. In The Wall Street Journal they confirmed that this rationing of computing is certainly occurring among AI platforms due to high demand. We have a good example of the consequences in David Hsu, founder and CEO of Retool. He explained in said newspaper that although he preferred Claude Opus 4.6 to power his AI agent, he recently had to switch to the OpenAI model because “Anthropic keeps crashing all the time.” Prices change (silently). The Information indicated yesterday that Anthropic is changing the way it bills users of Enterprise plans. Instead of a subscription of $200 per month with a “flat rate” for using their AI models, what they will do is charge a base rate of $20 per user per month and to that they will add the consumption of each user with the standard price of their API. Your own updated documentation points it out (“Use is not included in the per-seat rate”) and it is estimated that the change could double or even triple the cost of using Claude for heavy users. The discounts of 10 to 15% on the API that were included in the past and that allowed companies to scale this token consumption in a more affordable way also disappear. Prices per million tokens have not changed, but we went from a “flat rate” (with usage fees) to a pay-per-use model, much more expensive for heavy users. It’s not just Anthropic. … Read more

two TVs with Fire TV and speaker with Harman audio for 408 euros

Xiaomi has gone overboard with this pack that it has available on its website. If you were thinking of renewing your old TV, now is a good time to do it. You can take the Xiaomi TF 32 + the Xiaomi TV F 43 and the speaker Xiaomi Bluetooth Speaker at a price you won’t believe: 408 euros. Xiaomi TV F 32 2026 + Xiaomi TV F 43 2026 + Xiaomi Bluetooth Speaker The price could vary. We earn commission from these links A perfect pack to have a TV with Fire TV twice The crown jewels of this pack that Xiaomi offers on its website are these two TVs. These are two models belonging to the Xiaomi F 2026 series. Both have the same characteristics, what changes is their diagonal: 32 and 43 inchesbeing perfect options to renew old televisions in the kitchen or bedroom or equip your second home with them. The best thing about this TV from the Chinese manufacturer is that it integrates Fire TV as an operating systemthe same one worn by the Fire TV Stick from Amazon. This translates into full integration with Alexa and a fully optimized interface. Its design stands out for its almost non-existent edges and metallic finish, but there are many other things it houses inside that deserve to be highlighted. For example, although the panel is 60 Hz, it allows reaching 120 Hz in games thanks to the Game Boost mode. In audio it is compatible with Dolby Audio and DTS Virtual:X And, in addition, it comes with a , double that of the previous generation, which will prevent you from having to delete apps every now and then. Likewise, it stands out for being compatible with Apple AirPlaysomething that not many TVs in its price range can boast of. Regarding the Xiaomi Bluetooth Speaker that comes in the pack, what stands out most is that it allows professional adjustment thanks to the Harman AudioEFX audio software, thus offering a more balanced sound. In addition, the speaker incorporates touch controls and offers a total power of 40 W. It connects via Bluetooth 5.3 and its battery is charged via USB-C port, offering a total autonomy of up to 17 hours of use. ⚡ IN SUMMARY: xiaomi tv f 32 + xiaomi tv f 43 + xiaomi bluetooth speaker pack ✅ THE BEST Qunbeatable strength: For what a single TV usually costs, with this pack you get two televisions (ideal for the bedroom, kitchen or your second home) and, in addition, a Bluetooth speaker as a gift. Integration with Alexa: Coming with Fire TV as standard, if you have Alexa-compatible devices at home, you can easily control them from the TV using voice commands. ❌ THE WORST The brightness in HDR… Although it supports HDR10 and HLG, the maximum brightness is still somewhat limited if you put the TV in a brightly lit room. Advertising on the interface… Fire TV is a great system, but Amazon tends to be quite aggressive by showing recommendations and ads in the main menu. 💡 BUY IT IF… You already use Alexa at home and consume Prime Video, there is no better option. The remote with a dedicated button to talk to the voice assistant is very good. ⛔ DON’T BUY IT IF… Your living room is very bright, reflections could be a problem, especially if you have a large window right in front of you. You may also be interested

China prepares a 2nm AI chip to end NVIDIA’s dominance. Your problem is how you are going to manufacture it

A new chip designer for artificial intelligence (IA) is preparing to take the field in China. And he intends to make a lot of noise. In fact, it is already doing so. It’s called Dishan Technology, and, according to SCMP, is already verifying the prototype of a 2nm AI GPU that uses a hybrid integration technology that combines FinFET and GAA transistors (Gate-All-Around). However, this is not the only thing that has emerged. According to Dishan Technology, this chip will be 40% more energy efficient than its predecessor and will be compatible with CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture), from NVIDIA. This latest technology brings together the compiler and development tools used by programmers to develop their software for NVIDIA GPUs, so if Dishan’s chip is really compatible it will be much easier to integrate it into facilities that already have GPUs from this American company. Although, as I mentioned above, Dishan already has a prototype of its chip, it will take another year or two to refine its technology enough to make large-scale manufacturing possible. Be that as it may, what has not been revealed is who is going to manufacture it. SMICthe largest Chinese semiconductor producer, can currently only manufacture 7nm chips using the multiple patterning. And TSMC, Intel and Samsung, which could produce it, will hardly do so in the current geopolitical context due to the demands of the US sanctions on China. We will see how Dishan Technology solves this challenge. China already has three “champions” in its AI chip ecosystem The country led by Xi Jinping you already have three alternatives very clear to NVIDIA. Although not as well-known as Huawei or Moore Threads, Cambricon Technologies is one of the companies specialized in designing GPUs for AI with the greatest growth potential. In fact, in August 2025 it received approval from the Shanghai Stock Exchange (China) to raise $560 million. He is allocating them to the design of four chips for training and inference of AI models, and also to the development of an alternative to CUDA. Moore Threads has developed several GPUs that rival advanced solutions from NVIDIA, AMD or Huawei On the other hand, Moore Threads has developed several GPUs for AI applications that, on paper, rival some of the advanced solutions that NVIDIA, AMD or Huawei have placed on the market. The cards MTT S4000 and MTT S3000 They are its most interesting proposals right now, although, curiously, the MTT S80 card also appears in its portfolio, a proposal for games and content creation that, according to Moore Threads itself, has a computing capacity of 14.4 TFLOPS in single-precision floating point operations. The other indispensable player in the Chinese AI chip industry is Huawei. His most ambitious proposal right now is the chip Ascend 950PRwhich aims to surpass the performance of the GPU NVIDIA H100. However, this Chinese company also launched its chips last year Ascend 910D and 920. This last solution is clearly intended to compete in the Chinese market with NVIDIA’s H20 GPU. Presumably at the end of 2026 it will launch its Ascend 950DT chip, and the Ascend 960 and 970 GPUs will arrive in 2027 and 2028 respectively. Image | Generated by Xataka with Gemini More information | SCMP In Xataka | TSMC acknowledges that it has considered taking its factories out of Taiwan. It’s impossible for a good reason. In Xataka | The looming bottleneck in AI is neither RAM nor gas: it’s that TSMC’s N3 node is absolutely saturated

the rules of war are being redefined

In 2007, at a military range in South Africa, an automatic anti-aircraft gun Oerlikon GDF-005 got out of control during an exercise and opened fire without human intervention, causing several victims before being arrested. That incident, investigated for years, is often remembered because left a lesson disturbing about what can happen when machines begin to act in combat environments. That scenario is already happening in Ukraine. The first position captured without humans. In the words of ukrainian president himself several hours ago, the war in the country has crossed an unprecedented border: for the first time in history, a Russian position was taken without the direct intervention of soldiersonly through aerial drones and ground robots. The operation, which ended with the surrender of Russian troops, left no casualties on the Ukrainian side and marked a milestone that until recently belonged more to science fiction than military reality. Here names appear like TerMIT, Ratel, Ardal, Lynx or Volya, “soldiers” who are no longer prototypes, but protagonists of a new way of fighting where machines execute complete missions. The event. The Zelensky’s statement has not been independently verified, but was accompanied by a promotional video in which he described that Ukrainian military robots had completed more than 22,000 missions in the last three months. Ukraine’s Defense Ministry also recently reported a three-fold increase in the Ukrainian military’s unmanned ground vehicle missions over the past five months, with more than 9,000 robotic missions carried out in March, according to Scripps News. The growing presence of ground robots represents a new trend in a war that has become synonymous with drones. An option. According to The IndependentZelenskyy’s statement could refer to an event that occurred last year in Kharkiv Oblast, northeastern Ukraine. That statement cited a statement from Ukraine’s 3rd Independent Assault Brigade detailing how the unit had used drones and kamikaze ground robots to attack Russian fortified positions on the front lines. The brigade’s statement also described Russian soldiers surrendering to one of the unit’s robots after abandoning damaged fortifications. In fact, it we get to count and there are several examples advances of Russian soldiers, individually or in small groups, surrendering to drones Ukrainians and even before a robotwhile they were recorded on video, so the idea that a group of Russian soldiers surrender to a robot is not far-fetched. Plus: the exploits of these robots on the battlefield also appeared in a recent video which described a similar, or possibly identical, incident involving the same brigade. From logistical support to assault force. Because what began as a limited use of robots for transportation or evacuation tasks has quickly evolved into an active role in combat. I counted a few weeks ago the Guardian that, in a matter of months, missions with unmanned ground vehicles have multiplied, going from thousands to tens of thousands, while drones dominate the battlefield and cause the majority of casualties. In this environment, robots have taken on roles increasingly aggressivefrom placing explosives to opening fire or acting as suicide units, integrating into coordinated operations that previously required infantry. Moving is almost impossible. It we have been counting. The rise of these systems responds to a brutal reality: the front has become a constant death zone dominated by drones, one where any human movement is detected and attacked within minutes. With areas of up to 20 kilometers under permanent surveillance, soldiers can barely move without exposing themselves to attack, which has forced them to completely rethink the way they operate. In that context, sending machines instead of people is not only a tactical advantage, but a necessity to survive. The scene that defines everything. During the last months we have related all kinds of episodes more typical of a fantastic novel. Possibly images of Russian soldiers surrendering to robots armed groups condense this paradigm shift. In some cases, fighters have emerged from destroyed positions to surrender to remotely controlled devices, aware that they were not facing a conventional enemy. For this reason, the operation that has culminated in the capture of a position without direct human intervention reflects the extent to which the war has entered a phase where the physical presence of the soldier is no longer essential to gain ground. Ecosystem in full acceleration. Behind these advances is a dynamic system in which engineers, manufacturers and combat units they work togethertesting and perfecting technologies in real time. In that sense, Ukraine has turned the need in innovationdeveloping fast and scalable solutions that compensate for its resource disadvantage compared to Russia. In fact, it is on its way to becoming one of the great powers weapons with drones and AI as standard bearers of this new war. Hence, furthermore, the model has aroused so much interest from other countries and military alliances, watching how the integration of drones and robots redefines tactics and preparation for future conflicts. A revolution beyond Ukraine. If you also want, beyond the immediate impact on the conflict, all these advances point to a deeper transformation of the art of modern war. Robots already represent an essential part of logistics and begin to replace infantry of the last century in key tasks, with the possibility of significantly reducing the number of soldiers needed at the front. In other words, what happened with that captured position without humans It is not an isolated episode, but rather the preview of a model in which machines will not only accompany the soldier, but, in certain situations, will wage war on their own, completely replacing them. Image | YouTube In Xataka | If you thought Hormuz was not enough, the war in Ukraine has opened another maritime front in Europe: the Gulf of Finland In Xataka | If fog was deadly in Ukraine’s winter, spring is offering Russia a key advantage: greenery

Your subscription now includes 99,999 Freepik credits to use its artificial intelligence

Xataka Xtra keeps improving. If just a few days ago we announced an exclusive discount in the Samsung online store, today we are pleased to announce that, from now on, all members of the Xtra community can get 99,999 free credits to use Pikasothe suite of generative artificial intelligence tools from the Spanish company Freepik. In this way, anyone can generate a (good) handful of images, audio or videos using models such as Nano Banana 2, Kling 3.0, Seedance 2.0, ElevenLabs Music or Google Lyria, among others. This is an exclusive advantage for Xataka Xtra members. If you are not yet part of the community, You can subscribe from only two euros per month. Freepik credits galore for Xtra members From this very moment, all Xataka Xtra members will find in their member area a unique and exclusive code for each useras well as instructions to redeem it in your Freepik accounts. The code gives access to 99,999 Pikaso credits that will last until completely consumed or for three months from when the code is redeemed. If the code is not used, it will expire within one year. It should be noted that it is not necessary to be a Freepik subscriber, just create an account and redeem the code. Here you can find all video models, all image, all audio and all 3das well as the amount of credits consumed by each generation. For example, Nano Banano Pro 2 4K consumes 150 credits per image, so your code could generate 666 images. Seedance 2.0, for its part, consumes 5,500 credits for every 15 seconds of 720p video. That is, there is more than enough credits to try and experiment as much as you want. In addition to these models, Magnific, the AI ​​rescaler, is also available. Join Xataka Xtra and save The Xataka Xtra subscription includes this and many other exclusive benefits, from a Discord server for subscribers to a direct line with editors through El Consultorio, a monthly meeting with the house’s editors and, as is obvious, an ever-growing list of discounts and advantages on digital services. Can join Xataka Xtra from only two euros per month and take advantage not only of these Freepik credits, but of all those already available and those yet to come: Image | Xataka In Xataka | 48 hours at Upscale Conf: what happens to human creativity when thousands of human creatives fall in love with AI

the great waste management fraud

In the early 1980s, some North American cities began to realize that the waste generated by plastic was enormous and uncontrollable. Technicians and activists began to talk about regulations and prohibitions, but the industry found another way to solve it: recycling. The standard. For 50 years, the petrochemical industry has promoted recycling as the ‘gold standard’ for solving plastic pollution. Today, We know that only 9% of all plastic produced historically has been recycled. It was not a miscalculationnor a display of naive optimism: it was a large-scale industrial fraud. A documented fraud. In 1973, ahead of the regulatory wave, the Society of the Plastics Industry commissioned a report to see what could be done with the plastic they made themselves. The study’s conclusions were devastating: not only did it recognize the inherent degradation of resins in each reprocessing cycle, but it made clear that (even in the best of cases) there was no market for the final product. And, of course, the industry didn’t care. A report from the Center for Climate Integrity and the summary of a macro-case by the California attorney general against ExxonMobil give us the keys to understand it. Because it’s not exactly a secret. An Exxon employee recognized in 1994 before the American Plastics Council that “the company was committed to recycling activities, but not to their results.” The founder of the Vinyl Institute (one of the sector’s lobbies) admitted in 1989 that recycling could not be continued indefinitely and that, of course, it did not solve the problem of solid waste. We have proof. What’s more, for decades, we have known that there are internal documents that show patterns of investments in recycling plants that were closed or abandoned once they had fulfilled their public relations function. The tests go on and on. However, no one paid much attention. The parallelism with climate denialism ands patent: the documentation is crystal clear. The industry knew recycling wouldn’t work, but spent millions and millions actively promoting it with the idea of ​​avoiding regulations. And why is it news now? Because there are doubts that this is over. Yes, the average citizen has internalized that separating waste and depositing it in the yellow container (or the equivalent system) is an effective environmental action. In fact, the better the citizen recycles, the more effective the industry’s alibi is to continue producing plastic without restrictions. Recycling actually displaces regulatory pressure. Because the data (and recycling rates whatever the approach) is not as good as we might think. And the problem is volume. Plastic production is going at such a speed that even by significantly improving recycling rates we would not be able to reduce the amount of plastic that ends up in the environment. And what do we do? That’s the big question: what do we do. Our society has become so dependent on plastic that the most effective solutions are outside the realm of possibility. But if the situation continues like thisthey will stop being so sooner rather than later. Image | Nick Fewings In Xataka | We have known for years that our recycling system is broken. It seems that we are finally going to fix it

We have reached a point where artists have to explain that they have made their works without the help of AI and not the other way around.

“I spent 40 hours making a digital painting and the first comment I get says: nice AI art.” He tells it a user on Redditbut it is not an isolated case. Not too long ago, we thought that the solution was tag all AI-made contentbut we quickly realized that It was a huge challenge.. Today, it is human artists who have to defend that their art is real. What is happening. More and more artists are accused of having used AI in their works, especially when they are works that tend more towards realism and have a high level of detail. Many artists choose share your entire work process on networks and some deliver the files in layers to their clients to cover their backs and so that there is no room for doubt. It is not something that happens only with plastic arts, they have also been accused video game developers and writers. If I don’t know if it’s AI, then everything is AI. AI imaging capabilities have reached a level where the eye is no longer able to distinguish a real image from a generated one. Our ability to capture and distinguish visual information is suffering a shock in real time and the natural response is distrust; Since we can no longer trust what our eyes see, we question it. Is something too well drawn? It must be AI. Is a text suspiciously well written? You sure have done it with ChatGPT. It is a defensive posture that also responds to the fact that, if you believe something false, you look like a loser, while if you question something real, you are simply a skeptic. Label the human. Labeling AI content sounded good, but it hasn’t worked. Much of the blame lies with the platforms for not having been tougher with their application. We have the case of Etsy, a platform that was the refuge of crafts and has ended up becoming a bazaar of slop AI that pretends to be real. In this context, the solution seems to be just the opposite: labeling what is made by humans, as a kind of quality seal. Adam Mosseri said itdirector of Instagram, a few months ago: Platforms like Instagram do a good job of identifying AI-generated content, but their effectiveness will decrease over time as AI improves. It will be more practical to identify real content than fake content. AI detectors are not reliable. It is a fact and we have seen it on several occasions: universities falsely accusing hundreds of students of using AI because a software (also AI, of course) told him so, AI detectors who believe ‘One Hundred Years of Solitude’ was made with a chatbot…The quality of content generated with AI is advancing so quickly that it is no longer impossible to distinguish it from the real thing, which is why the proposal for human content labels makes sense. Something like the ‘denomination of origin’ seal on food. There are several proposals. They count in Verge that there are quite a few proposals that want to praise human content, offered by different associations such as Not By AI, ProudlyHuman, Human Authored or Human Made. The problem is that many of these labels do not have a complex authentication process behind them, but are based on simple trust. For it to be a reliable label, it is necessary to verify the work process using sketches or diagrams, something that is much more laborious to achieve. In Xataka | Crocheting was a peaceful refuge from the stress and information overload of the internet. Until AI arrived

LaLiga’s massive IP blocks are making life impossible for users, companies and developers. So you can claim

LittleCranky67, which is the alias of our protagonist, didn’t know what was happening with his computer this weekend. This developer was doing something that never gave him any trouble: working with the GitLab platform to download a Docker software package. That process kept giving him strange errors, and LittleCranky67 ended up realizing what had caused it all: LaLiga’s indiscriminate IP blocking. After share your frustration on HackerNewshundreds of comments confirmed other similar cases, and in them we also discovered something interesting: how to officially claim LaLiga. Or at least, how to try. A sad old story. LaLiga he shields himself in the Judgment of December 18, 2024 issued by the Commercial Court No. 6 of Barcelona. This allows you to demand from operators such as Movistar, Vodafone, Orange or Digi to block at the IP level any address that is identified as a source of illegal IPTV broadcasts during LaLiga football matches. Many of those IPs are Cloudflare shared IPs, so when the IPTV service IP is blocked, all domains associated with that shared IP are blocked, which can be hundreds or even thousands. And in those domains there are web pages of private usersfrom companies that they stop being able to sell and also critical services for developers such as Docker, GitHub or GitLab. The irony is that lockdowns don’t work. While many users complain about these blocks and how are affecting websites and services that usemany others continue to remember on social networks that in reality the blocks to view these IPTV broadcasts can be easily circumvented in many ways. The most popular, use VPN services. In LaLiga they know that this method is widely used, so for months They are also working on blocking those services. It doesn’t seem to be serving a lotand whoever really wants to watch the football game without paying has many relatively simple ways to achieve it. If you are affected, you can claim. In that thread, several users remember that one way to try to change things is for users to protest, complain and complain en masse. There are several ways to do it: Telecommunications User Service Office. It is the official body in Spain for these cases. A formal claim can be filed for arbitrary loss of service or censorship, and even claim financial losses if the blockade prevents you from working. Those who have a digital certificate or Cl@ve can do so directly online. Complain to your internet provider. It is also important to open a support ticket with your operator. It is true that they are obliged to follow court orders, but they must know that the blockade is causing collateral damage to services that have nothing to do with football. Common Electronic Registry (SARA network). This portal It also allows you to send formal complaints to management if other methods fail. Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD). Those responsible for RootedCON have been fighting this situation for some time, and offer another recommendation: report LaLiga to the AEPD. This template allows you to complete that complaint in a simple way Demagive to Telecommunications Operators. At RootedCON they also suggest filing a complaint against ISPs, and explain the process in a small thread on Twitter. Again, just download a request and file it individually. Complaint to the European Commission. It is also possible to enter the European Commission complaints website to send a claim to the entity. We explained it in Xataka and the process is another way of trying to stop this situation with the help of European bodies. The BOE serves as a defensive argument. In these complaints it is advisable to cite the BOE-A-2022-10757 as a legal reference. It corresponds to Law 11/2022, of June 28, General Telecommunications (LGTel) and is the fundamental rule that regulates your rights as an internet user in Spain. The message that we can write is the following: “Under the protection of Law 11/2022, of June 28, General Telecommunications (BOE-A-2022-10757), specifically regarding the rights of end users (Chapter IV) and the principles of continuity and quality of service, I present this claim for the blocking of access to legitimate IP addresses (specify which ones, e.g. Cloudflare/Docker) unrelated to any illicit activity. This blockade constitutes a violation of my right to communication and the contracted service, causing harm (professional/personal) by preventing the operation of work/security tools. “I request the immediate cessation of said technical restriction in compliance with the provisions of the aforementioned Law.” The nightmare continues. The debate in HackerNews is nothing more than confirmation of what internet users in Spain have been suffering for more than a year. A private organization has the power to order ISPs in a country to indiscriminately block IPs without judicial review in real time, during regular hours, causing documented harm to third parties that have nothing to do with the original violation. In that thread some users compare the situation with that of the Great Firewall of Chinanot so much in intensity as in its logic. We are faced with an infrastructure of selective censorship that seems to be able to be applied to any content that an actor with sufficient judicial power wants to block. From football to tennis or golf. In fact, things could go further, because what began as an attack against illegal broadcasts of football matches could now be seen in other sports such as tennis or golf. Telefónica —which follows in the footsteps of LaLiga— wants to extend indiscriminate blockades to the Champions League, tennis or golf. This threatens to suffer these side effects for many more days and for many more hours, and can mean that for a good part of the week, users like LittleCranky67 find themselves unable to download Docker packages or access thousands of legitimate websites that end up being knocked down by these blocks. Images | Wirestock | LaLiga In Xataka | LaLiga has been at war with Cloudflare for years over piracy. It has just joined forces with its main competitor

What is the minimum age this year and how to know when you can retire

Let’s tell you what it is the new retirement age in 2026since the minimum age has once again increased by 2 months compared to last year. Thus, if you are already close in age and want to know exactly from what years and months you can retire, you will have this information. We are also going to tell you how to know when you can retireusing a tool that will take into account your work history to calculate it for you. So, if you are going to apply for retirementyou will be able to know when you can retire and how much you will earn with this contributory pension. Minimum retirement age in 2026 The minimum retirement age in 2026 becomes 66 years and ten months. This represents an increase of two months compared to the retirement age we had in 2025, which in turn was 2 months higher than the previous year. This new change has begun to be applied starting January 1. And as for the change itself, this is because the retirement age is going to increase little by little over the next few years. You can review this update and how it will continue to change in our article with the retirement table. How to know when it’s time to retire To find out when it is your turn to retire, you can use the new web retirement simulator of Social Security, whose address is benefits.seg-social.es. Once you enter the website, Click on the section Retirement You will see where they ask what they can help you with. You will go to a page with all the procedures related to retirement. here, now press the button Access of the Retirement simulatorwhich will see you in a different colored window. This will take you to the retirement pension simulator page, where you will find several options. In it, simply press the button Simulate which will appear in blue. This will take you to the page where you will have to identify with some of the alternatives that the system offers you. You will be able to use the Cl@ve Permanent or Cl@ve Pinan SMS or via DNIe either digital certificate. Click on the option you want and complete the identification steps. Finally you will enter the simulator, where you will be able to edit and confirm your personal situations. When you do, you will be able to see your retirement pension simulation, where The exact date on which you can retire will be indicatedand the amounts you will receive when you finally do it. In Xataka Basics | Request a card for Social Security retirees and take advantage of discounts

from the anti-aging miracle with scientific backing to the dangerous world of injectable ‘looksmaxxing’

We live in a time where people do not stop complement your nutrition with magnesium, collagenvitamins and more. But in recent months you have surely come across the famous ‘peptides’, a compound that has gained quite a bit of momentum in the world of cosmetics under the trend called looksmaxxing and also in bodybuilding. But… Do they have any scientific endorsement? What are peptides? In biological terms, peptides are short chains of amino acids that act as the building blocks of proteins, such as collagen, elastin and keratin. They are naturally in our body from the protein that we administer in our diet, and that the body uses as bricks to build the elements of the skin, muscle, immune system and many more functions. But this is something that has happened from natural biology to the field of cosmetics and nutricosmeticssince it has been seen that when these peptides are applied to the skin, they act as “messengers” that trick the body into believing that it has lost collagen, stimulating its production. In this way an anti-wrinkle effect is promised. What does science say? Unlike many “miracle supplements” that flood the internet, topical and oral peptides do have robust scientific backing, although, as always, keep in mind that you should not expect an amazing miracle when applying them. Among one of the most representative studies we have that of the Spanish Society of Aesthetic Medicine (SEME) which analyzed the effect of biomimetic peptides in patients between 40 and 70 years old. Here it was seen that, after four sessions, the biopsies confirmed real changes in the skin as there was a greater proliferation of collagen and elastin. There is more. Clinical trials with active ingredients such as Matrixyl in 93 people showed also a noticeable reduction in fine lines after 12 weeks of use, and also collagen peptide supplements such as Peptan have been shown in clinical trials to be able to reduce wrinkles around the eyes by 13% and pores by 57%. The dark side. When this becomes an obsession, that is when the problems begin, and again social networks have been a trigger. Here TikTok or Instagram has caused a trend known as looksmaxxing to break out., which in Spanish could be translated as ‘maximize appearance’. And it is nothing more than a subculture, predominant in younger men, who wants to optimize their physical attractiveness to the maximum. While the softmaxxing includes gym routines, haircuts and intense skincare, the most extreme aspect has popularized the use of injectable peptides. Suddenly, it’s not uncommon to see videos of content creators showing off refrigerators full of vials that promise ultra-luminous skin, instant muscle recovery, extreme fat loss, or hyper-defined jawlines. And it is a danger. The big problem with these injectables is that they are often not regulated, and people resort to the Internet to buy them thanks to the legal loopholes created by products under investigation or not suitable for human consumption. Here different organizations have launched alerts warning that using products that have not been authorized by the responsible agencies can cause serious risks such as infections, abscesses or even tissue necrosis. A gym shortcut. Beyond wanting to maximize beauty and reduce the number of wrinkles, in the world of bodybuilding, peptides have burst onto the scene, presenting themselves as a modern alternative to classic steroids. In this way, it is not uncommon to hear about BPC-157, TB-500 or CJC-1295, which are peptides that promise great aesthetic results. His promises. BPC-157 or TB-500 have been dubbed ‘healing peptides’ due to the great fame they have gained by promising regeneration of tendons, ligaments or muscle tears in record time. Another popular group are secretogogues such as CJC-1295 They stimulate the pituitary gland to produce growth hormone ‘naturally’, which enhances muscle growth and fat burning much more quickly than by directly injecting the hormone. Your problems. The problem in the field of bodybuilding is the same as in the aesthetic field, but multiplying the doses. Here science points out that although it is true that the BPC-157 can ‘heal’ tissues, at the moment it has not been approved by the EMA or the FDA for this use because there are a lack of studies to support its safety and the recommended dosage. Furthermore, playing with hormonal levels does not come for free, and without going any further, enhancing the release of growth hormone to have more muscle increases IGF-1 levels. And this in the long term can cause insulin resistance and, therefore, open the door to type 2 diabetes in several years. That is why the recommendation is always to avoid their consumption without medical supervision and logically if they have not been approved by the agencies responsible for drug control. Images | Norbert Buduczki In Xataka | Magnesium, creatine, collagen: we are taking supplements above what science believes is useful

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.