LaLiga’s massive IP blocks are making life impossible for users, companies and developers. So you can claim

LittleCranky67, which is the alias of our protagonist, didn’t know what was happening with his computer this weekend. This developer was doing something that never gave him any trouble: working with the GitLab platform to download a Docker software package. That process kept giving him strange errors, and LittleCranky67 ended up realizing what had caused it all: LaLiga’s indiscriminate IP blocking. After share your frustration on HackerNewshundreds of comments confirmed other similar cases, and in them we also discovered something interesting: how to officially claim LaLiga. Or at least, how to try. A sad old story. LaLiga he shields himself in the Judgment of December 18, 2024 issued by the Commercial Court No. 6 of Barcelona. This allows you to demand from operators such as Movistar, Vodafone, Orange or Digi to block at the IP level any address that is identified as a source of illegal IPTV broadcasts during LaLiga football matches. Many of those IPs are Cloudflare shared IPs, so when the IPTV service IP is blocked, all domains associated with that shared IP are blocked, which can be hundreds or even thousands. And in those domains there are web pages of private usersfrom companies that they stop being able to sell and also critical services for developers such as Docker, GitHub or GitLab. The irony is that lockdowns don’t work. While many users complain about these blocks and how are affecting websites and services that usemany others continue to remember on social networks that in reality the blocks to view these IPTV broadcasts can be easily circumvented in many ways. The most popular, use VPN services. In LaLiga they know that this method is widely used, so for months They are also working on blocking those services. It doesn’t seem to be serving a lotand whoever really wants to watch the football game without paying has many relatively simple ways to achieve it. If you are affected, you can claim. In that thread, several users remember that one way to try to change things is for users to protest, complain and complain en masse. There are several ways to do it: Telecommunications User Service Office. It is the official body in Spain for these cases. A formal claim can be filed for arbitrary loss of service or censorship, and even claim financial losses if the blockade prevents you from working. Those who have a digital certificate or Cl@ve can do so directly online. Complain to your internet provider. It is also important to open a support ticket with your operator. It is true that they are obliged to follow court orders, but they must know that the blockade is causing collateral damage to services that have nothing to do with football. Common Electronic Registry (SARA network). This portal It also allows you to send formal complaints to management if other methods fail. Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD). Those responsible for RootedCON have been fighting this situation for some time, and offer another recommendation: report LaLiga to the AEPD. This template allows you to complete that complaint in a simple way Demagive to Telecommunications Operators. At RootedCON they also suggest filing a complaint against ISPs, and explain the process in a small thread on Twitter. Again, just download a request and file it individually. Complaint to the European Commission. It is also possible to enter the European Commission complaints website to send a claim to the entity. We explained it in Xataka and the process is another way of trying to stop this situation with the help of European bodies. The BOE serves as a defensive argument. In these complaints it is advisable to cite the BOE-A-2022-10757 as a legal reference. It corresponds to Law 11/2022, of June 28, General Telecommunications (LGTel) and is the fundamental rule that regulates your rights as an internet user in Spain. The message that we can write is the following: “Under the protection of Law 11/2022, of June 28, General Telecommunications (BOE-A-2022-10757), specifically regarding the rights of end users (Chapter IV) and the principles of continuity and quality of service, I present this claim for the blocking of access to legitimate IP addresses (specify which ones, e.g. Cloudflare/Docker) unrelated to any illicit activity. This blockade constitutes a violation of my right to communication and the contracted service, causing harm (professional/personal) by preventing the operation of work/security tools. “I request the immediate cessation of said technical restriction in compliance with the provisions of the aforementioned Law.” The nightmare continues. The debate in HackerNews is nothing more than confirmation of what internet users in Spain have been suffering for more than a year. A private organization has the power to order ISPs in a country to indiscriminately block IPs without judicial review in real time, during regular hours, causing documented harm to third parties that have nothing to do with the original violation. In that thread some users compare the situation with that of the Great Firewall of Chinanot so much in intensity as in its logic. We are faced with an infrastructure of selective censorship that seems to be able to be applied to any content that an actor with sufficient judicial power wants to block. From football to tennis or golf. In fact, things could go further, because what began as an attack against illegal broadcasts of football matches could now be seen in other sports such as tennis or golf. Telefónica —which follows in the footsteps of LaLiga— wants to extend indiscriminate blockades to the Champions League, tennis or golf. This threatens to suffer these side effects for many more days and for many more hours, and can mean that for a good part of the week, users like LittleCranky67 find themselves unable to download Docker packages or access thousands of legitimate websites that end up being knocked down by these blocks. Images | Wirestock | LaLiga In Xataka | LaLiga has been at war with Cloudflare for years over piracy. It has just joined forces with its main competitor

Telefónica had remained in a discreet background in LaLiga’s war against Cloudflare. That is over

The indiscriminate blockages of IPS From LaLiga now they have a new protagonist. Telefónica has sent a document to the European Commission in which it defends said blockages And openly criticizes the techniques and technologies that Cloudflare uses to protect the privacy of users. What happened. The commission made a consultation with the audiovisual and operators sector with the idea of ​​regulating it and taking measures in a specific scenario: protection against piracy of live sports emissions and other events. As indicated In BandanchaTelefónica responded with a document Posted on May 27. It speaks of a situation that according to this company harms the operators when it comes to fighting piracy in those broadcasts. The problems grow. According to Telefónica, illegal access to emissions of all kinds has been increased since the European Commission (EC) published its initial recommendations to combat online sports piracy in May 2023. According to their data, between 43 and 46% of users with Internet access report that they also have illegal acesses to audiovisual content. DSA is not enough. For Telefónica THE DIGITAL SERVICES ACT (DSA) It is not enough to combat piracy in live sports broadcasts. They cite article 7 of that regulation indicating that it introduces the principle of good Samaritan: it allows services to voluntarily take measures to detect and eliminate illegal stines. That policy is voluntary, not mandatory, which according to Telefónica causes lagoons in its application. Intermediaries are saved. Article 16 of the DSA is also seen as insufficient by Telefónica, since it excludes intermediaries. They ask for more strict requirements for servers of DNS, VPN file hosting. And they also point to the platforms that provide reverse proxies and CDNS, which allow this type of internet activity. Criticism of ECH. The ECH technology (Encrypted Client Hello) is an extension of the TLS protocol that prevents operators from identifying which specific domain is requesting the user and prevents them from blocking specific domains. This technology protects the privacy of the suppliers of these contents and Telefónica asks for legal instruments and tools “that are equated with the same level of technical development” of these mechanisms. Or what is the same: asks for ways of being able to undo what Ech does. And fight against P2P. In Telefónica expressly cite the ACESTREAM BASED P2P NETWORKS as responsible for 30-40% of the total volume of platforms with live sports emissions contents illegally. They talk about how these networks are used through social networks and websites and even in APKs and multimedia players such as Kodi. Blocks sentences. The operator informed the CE of how to fight those emissions They fit several sentences. The most notable, number 310/2024 of December 18, of Court No. 6 of Barcelona and in which the plaintiffs were LaLiga and Movistar+. Cloudflare does not cooperate. In the telephone document openly accuse Cloudflare of “violating judicial sentences, refusing conscious and repeatedly to provide effective protection measures in reference to the services it manages.” For the operator “the level of breach and lack of cooperation is not precedents.” He also mentions that although he is in contact with intermediaries such as Cloudflarein certain cases there is only resistance in compliance with judicial sentences. EU measures are insufficient. Although the operator does not provide concrete data of the Impact dimension Of these emissions, they ensure that the current regulations are not enough. In the document they recommend being able to take stricter technical measures that, for example, allow “the immediate elimination of live illegal emissions and in any case in the first 30 minutes from the reception of the notification.” And the damage to third parties, what. The document does not speak at any time of damage to third parties that cause those indiscriminate blockages. It is not mentioned, for example, that in some days of LaLiga there have been about 2.7 million inaccessible web domains And it has also made many companies lose customers and income during those periods of inaccessibility. Not only that: The damage is also reputational: Services They are fallenbut not because of them, and many users may not know the background of the situation and make them unfairly responsible. The case is already in the Constitutional. In recent weeks we have seen how First rootedcon and Then cloudflare They have submitted two registered resources to the Constitutional Court in independent and separately. The objective is to annul the sentence in which LaLiga and Telefónica are supported – in addition to other operators – to carry out those indiscriminate blockages. There is no estimated date for the resolution of these resources. In Xataka | LaLiga has found the best way to beat Cloudflare: ally with its competition

LaLiga’s crusade with football comes long. And with Movistar and Cloudflare they are paying fair for sinners

Football is causing real chaos on the Internet. Not directly, but due to LaLiga’s obsession to avoid illegal emissions of the parties. The particular crusade of this body against these emissions comes from afar, but is beginning to cause real problems to users and companies that have nothing to do with the problem of these illegal emissions. War against IPTV Yy El Cardsharing. In December 2021 the Commercial Court No. 6 of Barcelona He issued an order aimed at the immediate blockade of domain names belonging to several IPTV and Cardhsaring suppliers. The court authorized LaLiga and Movistar+ to monitor web pages blocked throughout the season to identify possible changes in their identification, but they could also request the blockade of new domain names weekly. These requests should be executed by Internet access providers. Said blockages had already been executed In February 2020 After a sentence of the Commercial Court No. 7 of Madrid. Weekly locks. In August 2022 LaLiga and Movistar Plus+ They won a lawsuit Joint before the Commercial Court No. 9 of Barcelona that enabled them to “be able to block access to domains that facilitate the piracy of LaLiga content.” The “dynamic block” measure It allows URLs, domains and IP addresses to be identified weekly without communicating them previously to the Court. It was already decided that it would be in force until the current 2024/2025 season. Attempt to pursue user IPS. In March 204 LaLiga made it clear that I wanted to chase those users They see football by IPTV applications not allowed. A judicial order raised the possibility of track the IP addresses of those who profit economically with that activity. He precedent of the Euskaltel case Years before marked a turning point in this type of demand by content suppliers. Telegram lock attempt. That same month the National Court Ask to block Telegram in Spain to operators. The platform has become On the new Deep Weband through it all kinds of content are shared, even those of emissions that violate the copyright of their owners. Finally The blockade did not occur. LaLiga against Freedom on the Internet. In April 2024 the company He loaded against Google, Apple and Huawei As owners of application stores from where the NewPlay app could be downloaded, one of the IPTV apps accused of violating their rights. 450 euros for using the IPTV. LaLiga continued her particular crusade against freedom on the Internet and in June 2024 requested by letter 450 euros To users who had accessed IPTV to see LaLiga content illegally. Tracking UPS IPS. Just a month ago the Commercial Court No. 9 of Barcelona authorized LaLiga to receive Information about IPS connected to Acstream. A preliminary diligence requested by the League was agreed, which consists of: “sending to the operators of the IP addresses identified and ordered based on the ID of the” Ace Stream “channel in which they participate.” Criminal Procedure Law. This law includes in its article 13 the “provisional interruption of the services offered by said contents or in the provisional blockade of each other when they lie abroad.” However, its affectation to a fundamental right such as freedom of expression, and also these measures, which involve IPS blocking, are being carried out in certain cases in a seemingly indiscriminate manner, affecting both legitimate sites as to sites that are not. The reason is that platforms such as Cloudflare use IPS that share all those services. How illegal retransmissions are detected. The way to detect and knock down web domains that broadcast soccer matches illegally has changed a lot in recent years. In LaLiga they make use of Tools like Marauder, Lumière and Blackhole For these tasks, and said software It has generated interest internationally. IPTV as such are legal. NewPlay is one IPTV to use. Base are a completely legal type of application. They are still decoders of M3U lists. For practical purposes a kind of VLC -style player. While LaLiga accuses this type of applications to be used to reproduce content without permission, such as football matches. In addition, the Supreme Court has already established that football has no intellectual property. But the indiscriminate block of IPS is terrible. What is happening is that among the IPS that are blocked there are IPS managed by Cloudflare that are not dedicated to a single service, but are shared between tens, hundreds and even thousands of them. If the Internet supplier does not relate a selective block, when blocking the IP, it not only prevents access to who offers illegal content, but also to the rest of the services that are totally legitimate. Cloudflare does not make it easy. Cloudflare makes use of techniques such as ECH (Encrypted Client Hello) to protect the privacy of websites that share that IP, which makes the filtering of each other and the execution of a selective block. However, some operators like Vodafone They confirmed to Xataka Mobile that these days they applied a block “much more precise and adjusted to LaLiga’s request” although they did not give details about it. Movistar’s clients complained precisely that They were affected by indiscriminate blockages that prevented them from accessing numerous web sites and services. Imaghen | Compare fiber | LaLiga | Fancy Crave In Xataka | The positioning of the judges about LaLiga and the IPTV is clear: you cannot chase the end user

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.