moment

Some substack authors already invoice more than complete writings. The company has found its moment

by

Substock is in conversations to lift between 50 and 100 million dollars in a new financing round, with an assessment greater than the 700 million it reached in its last round, according to Eric Newcomerwho quotes his own sources the silence of replacement in this regard. Why is it important. The company has found the perfect moment: Trump’s return has triggered interest in Newsletters policies. Its mobile application is promoting payment subscriptions. With 500,000 creators on the platform, some already generate more income than entire traditional media. Two years ago There were already two doctors generating at least half a million a year. “At least”. It is the symbol of a trend of this decade: the permanent crisis of the media against author’s journalism, focused on a name and not on the brand of a large group. In figures. Substack stays with 10% of payments to writers. The total volume of subscriptions moves around 450 million dollars. 45 million, therefore, are the income of the platform. The context. We are seeing the rise of a new wave of independent journalists who have found an escape route to traditional media. In Spain the phenomenon is being several magnitudes lower than that of the United States, but there are prominent creators: Most are authors who seek independence to tell their stories or parallel projects rather than a replacement for their job. The panoramic. What started as a modern tool for Newsletters It has become a network of independent creators that competes with traditional media. Substack does two things: It offers journalists (and not journalists) with their own audience the opportunity to directly monetize their work leaving their media. Then paquetizes all that network of creators as a network with shared infrastructure. First fragment, then package. Yes, but. The model has its risks. The Newsletter Subtack average loses 50% of payment subscribers each year. To earn 50,000 dollars annually-an American average-moderate salary-charging $ 8 per month, a writer needs 900 payment subscribers. And also, add 31 a month to compensate for those who will leave. That constant pressure to create quality content (the one expected of someone in substitution who charges a subscription), often without more tools than the creator’s own mind, is also a risk to the Burnout. The model. And associated with these risks, there is the long -tailed model that prevails in substack. As in Onlyfansbut for different reasons, the economy of attention is reproduced: A few creators accumulate most income. A few live reasonably well. A huge mass gains symbolic amounts that need to complement to reach the end of the month. The Mehdi Hasan and Bari Weiss of the ecosystem generate hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Or millions. Niche creators with very faithful audiences can get between $ 50,000 and $ 200,000 a year. The vast majority stay with residual income, insufficient to dedicate full time. The backdrop. The migration to substock is no coincidence. Traditional media have cut templates for a decade while advertising income migrated to Google and Facebook. Between 2008 and 2020, United States lost more than 1,800 local newspapers In addition to usual cuts, rounds of layoffs, frozen hiring, etc. At the same time, star journalists discovered that their names had more value than headers. Matt Taibbi left Rolling StoneGlenn Greenwald left The interceptCasey Newton left The Verge. Everyone found in substitute not only more money, but total editorial independence. At stake. Substack is not alone in this race. Beehiiv, Kit and Ghost They compete for the same market, but with SAAS models that charge fixed monthly payments instead of 10% of substitution commission. Substack’s advantage is their discovery network: readers find new authors through recommendations. But if the big names migrate looking for better economic conditions, that network weakens. It is the paradox of all platforms: you need stars to attract talent, but the stars are the first to leave when alternatives appear. In Xataka | On an internet of social networks and fast content, an old forum resists against wind and tide: hacker news Outstanding image | Replaceck

The Catl battery factory in Aragon promised to generate thousands of work. At the moment, 2,000 Chinese will be left

by

1,847 Chinese workers. That is the estimated figure that, according to The Aragon newspaperwill arrive in Figueruelas to lift the battery production plant for electric cars that Catl and Stellantis signed months ago. Then it was sold that some 3,000 jobs would be created but, for the moment, almost 2,000 employees will come from the Asian country. The data. The first time that the subject was discussed Chain ser Last May. Then it was pointed out that Catl would arrive in Figueruelas (Aragon) with more than 2,200 workers from China who will raise the new battery factory for Stellantis “, in the words of Mayor Luis Bertol. The figure, as we see, has clarified until it closes in the aforementioned 1,847 workers. The town faces a challenge, since those almost 2,000 workers would fold the current census of inhabitants that In 2024 it was estimated at 1,240 neighbors. Obviously, the vast majority of factory workers that Stellantis has in the municipality live in nearby towns and, above all, in near Zaragoza since they are currently accounted for about 5,000 regular employees in the property of the car manufacturer. A promise. The new factory that Catl and Stellantis will raise in Figueruelas will be The largest battery producer of electric cars from our country, even ahead of Volkswagen’s in Sagunto. Then it was announced that it arrived with an investment of 4.1 billion euros under the arm. But it was also promised that it would create 3,000 direct jobs. The figure leaves the declaration of general interest (say) approved by the Government of Aragon to open the doors to the express processing of the aid, as collected in December 2024 in The Spanish. “The noise is in the media”. Since the news was known, the coming and going of the numbers on Chinese workers has raised some dust. It is not clear why CATL needs to bring almost 2,000 Chinese workers to raise their factory. Nor if that work could have been left in the close environment or if knowledge is missing for it. Similarly, it has also been put on the table how Figueruelas will face its population. Bertol pointed to The Aragon newspaper that “noise is more in the media than among our neighbors.” Explain that the idea is to start prefabricated housing near the factory facilities. And he shields that there was already a similar situation in the 80s when General Motors lifted the Opel plant (which now belongs to Stellantis) in the town. Is it legal? According to The Aragon newspaperChinese workers who will arrive in Figueruelas will not be only operators that aim to lift the factory. Intermediate controls are expected and, of course, high -ranking controls. To do this, Catl will apply the framework of the Unity Law of large companies and strategic groups (Law 14/2013) Born to promote the arrival of these macroprojects after the 2008 crisis. This law is included, for example, the streamlining of residence permits for highly qualified workers. Is Chinese labor needed? “At the start you need people who, getting out of the plane, know what to do in that factory later.” Thus defends Bertol, mayor of Figueruelas, the arrival of these workers in the city. “You don’t have to get your hands to the head for this matter, it is a logical and normal process,” he explains to The Aragon newspaper. “Catl brings battery technology, which is also the best in the world market, and brings its machines and ways of working.” Without these workers it would not be the factory in motion although, yes, it is not said how long they are expected to maintain their work in the Aragonese town or if formations will be established to local workers. Other cases. Although striking, the case of Figueruelas is not exceptional either. Catl’s landing in Germany was similarwith investments that came from the hand of Chinese workers who could train local workers but, above all, they did Full performance What was lifting. Byd has worked similarly on his arrival in Hungary. And it is something that works in the two West-Oriente directions. Following the tariff war that the United States opened with all the countries of the world, the debate of Why Apple did not make its iPhone in the United States. Beyond costs, there was a simple reason: there is a lack of people formed. Photo | Stellantis and Catl In Xataka | Nissan pointed to the electric car as a future plan. It will fire 9,000 employees and prove Toyota

Temu and Shein at the moment they get rid, the Big Tech breathe

by

After the storm, some calm. At least, temporary. The feared tariffs from the United States to imports from China products They threatened The world economy, but in recent days we have seen the Government of Donald Trump has paused these measures. In fact, he has just done the same with the measures that especially affected Temu and Shein. What happened. Donald Trump has applied A remarkable cut to tariffs that apply to small value packages that arrive from China and Hong Kong to the United States. Thus, the new tariffs on those packages of up to $ 800 of value go from 120% to 54%. The reduction is important, but tariffs continue to impose remarkable rates for this type of products. Temu and Shein breathe (a little). Chinese online trade giants such as Temu or Shein have been benefiting from The exemption called “Minimis” To be able to send low -cost products directly to consumers in the United States without paying import rates. That rule It was canceled by the Trump administration a few days ago, and that caused A domino effect which affected the Big Tech of the US. WOMAN FOR META AND GOOGLE. The decision also relaxes the pressure on Meta and Google, which were great beneficiaries of this commercial exchange. Temu and Shein They sold big in the US Thanks to the exemption of Minimis, but to achieve it they spent true fortunes in advertising that hired giants such as Meta and Google. By deactivating that exemption, advertising income immediately They diverse. These ads are expected to reactivate that advertising expense in the Big Tech. But be careful. Although the situation improves for Temu and Shein, the pause has a small print. Trump changed the minimis rule for a flat rate of $ 100 per package with value of less than $ 800, and that flat rate would amount to $ 200 in June. These rates are maintained despite the 90 -day truce agreement for other tariffs and make it sell directly from China to consumers (very) expensive for Temu or Shein. Temu dodges the measures selling from the US. To avoid the application of these tariffs as far as possible, Temu began to fill gigantic warehouses in the United States of their products to be able to send their “locally” products before they were affected by tariffs. That measure is temporary, because those warehouses will end up needing to fill again and it will be then when they will face these new tariffs. Plan B: No direct sale. Precisely at that time is when Temu has an escape with this announcement of the Trump administration. With the direct sale of products to consumers punished for tariffs and flat rates, the solution is not to sell directly, but fill their warehouses with large orders (no packages below $ 800) and then serve consumers locally. In this way “only” the new reduced tariffs (30%) apply and not those of 54% that affect these value packages of less than $ 800. It is certainly a respite for businesses like Temu, which have the United States as their large sales market. Trump continues to back. The month of April we lived a unique burst of ads in which the US decided to raise their tariffs to China and the Asian giant responded with equivalent climbs. The situation on April 11 reached absurd ends: US tariffs to Chinese imports reached 145%, and China’s to US products to 125%. Neither seemed to move token, but Trump ended up yielding Any was he who started hostilities. Yesterday both countries announced a 115% reduction in these reciprocal tariffs, which has been a real relief for the world economy. Image | Alain G. Shumbusho In Xataka | Spain acts where Europe doubts: the strategy that is paying fruits in China

Tesla wanted to make Cybertruck a supervent electric car. At the moment it is being a failure

by

Tesla needs to get stock from. It is something that seems to be screaming at the four winds with the last offers he is doing in the United States. Perhaps because they cannot squeeze more with prices, the company has launched a series of incentives to encourage the demand for its electric cars. Beyond specific discounts to eliminate the latest units of Tesla Model and before its Complete renewal (something common among manufacturers), the company is operating with 0% financing For buyers of Tesla Model 3, they point out from Bloomberg. But discounts are not here and are focusing on another vehicle that, because of their concept, should not have any problem to be sold. It is the Tesla Cybertruck to whose Tesla buyers is offering free recharges in its life supercores if they opt for its Foundation version. It is the best example of how the model is clicking. Too expensive and difficult to sell The offer we are talking about It can be found on the sales channel of Tesla in the United States for its vehicles in stock. Cars already manufactured with immediate delivery and that in some cases have been used as exposure cars or have a few thousand kilometers already tours. But what is most attracted is that with the purchase of this package Foundation Life recharges are obtained in their supercargators. An augation to get rid of the most expensive units of Tesla Cybertruck. In fact, None of them drop for $ 90,000 And in the case of Cyberbeast Foundation, the most powerful model with three electric motors, no unit is above $ 110,000. It is not the first time that Tesla has trouble carrying out the production of its version Foundation. At the end of the year We knew that Elon Musk’s were reconvirting some units of this version to sell it at a much lower price. The change was as simple as eliminating some badges from the vehicle and, using software to save the Full Self Driving (FSD)the company’s most advanced driving aid system. The package Foundation series It was selling to 20,000 euros and made clear the huge extra cost over the original version. Actually, it meant additional 12,000 euros for a few minor aesthetic details compared to those who chose the base model with the FSD package of driving aid. Judging by the inventory, everything indicates that the company overestimated the demand of the car and, specifically, of this version. The problem is in the approach that the company has given to the vehicle. He had everything to become a flag model of the company, make him an aspiring product that demonstrated what they were able to do. And instead, they opted for the worst of strategies. A model that was not destined to be a supervent Tesla Cybertruck was the tenth best -selling electric car in the United States, according to figures estimated by Car and Driver In 2024. The figure refers to the first full year in which the Tesla electric pick-up has been sold, estimating its sales in just under 25,000 units. Keep in mind that the company It does not reflect the figures of vehicles sold Model A Model. Of course, the company has wanted to make the model a supervent in the United States. His approach since it was announced has been that. In fact, the company said the model would be sold for $ 40,000, What could not complyannouncing a 60,000 version for later. Right now, The cheapest model that can be purchased implies a Disbursement of $ 72,490. Until the day of the presentation, the figures on vehicle reserves were growing, increasing expectations until they affirm that There were 1.9 million vehicle reserves. Months after launching we are seeing how Tesla has trouble placing part of its production. And it has it because the approach is totally contrary to what the car should have been. The Tesla Cybertruck should have been an aspirational model, a car that is built as a brand image, of which few units are sold at a very expensive price but attract looks and potential buyers. It is a basic marketing play which is being applied all life in the car market. When a company participates in a competition, it does it because it obtains a revenue in knowledge but also builds brand image. It is no accident that Renault changed the name of Your Formula 1 to Alpine team. Nor do BMW have a BMW XM either IX They barely sell. Or that Ford has separated its commercial offer between very clear lines: a passionate, face and that is willing to bring drops to Europe (like the Ford Bronco) and Another for all types of cheaper and accessible audiences. Companies that want to put in the street this type of vehicles aspire to create a story, position a model at the top of their range. The challenge is greater for young companies but even Xiaomi He has made efforts to build a story around his electric and that is why he has not hesitated to beat a record in various circuits, including some as iconic as the Green hell. The negative face is that the results accounts do not reflect in the short term the benefits of this strategy. Investments for these cars show their results at years. And force to have a lot of care in the production of the car. Tesla Cybertruck’s demand seemed uncontrolled before going out so the company had two roads. One was obvious: try to satisfy her. The second was to generate a certain shortage and sell the car in its top range versions, controlling the production and creating that unique vehicle aura. Instead, the company chose to make fast … and bad. Because Tesla’s electric pick-up that should be its technological flag has been called to review almost a dozen times For failures that suggest to what extent the company wanted to reduce production. That pieces are released in progress … Read more

There are people who never know when to leave a series. Someone has investigated the exact moment to do so

by

It has all the meaning of the world that we discuss and reflect tirelessly on what point the series spoils, how the series are not eternal and what methods we can find to anticipate the tragic moment in which our favorite series ceases to be what it was. After all, we invest a lot of time in them: They are hours and hours of our free time, and when they stop liking ourselves, we continue looking for their company in the hope that they will do it again. Sometimes it happens, sometimes not. Daniel Parris’s Newsletter Significant Star It is dedicated to answering these types of questions using thousands of data collected in databases of the most varied. ¿When we stop finding new music? ¿What classic films endure the passage of time? ¿They die more famous now than before? And above all, the essential:People hate as much as it looks like Coldplay? (In this case I can speak for me, and no statistics are needed). In this line of transcendental questions that can be answered with statistics (A fan of statistics assures us, but that’s another issue), it’s’How many episodes of a series have to endure before stopping seeing it?‘Before continuing, it would be necessary to clarify that these data start from the logical fallacy of thinking that a note in IMDB is the mother of the lamb, and a series (or episode) that suspends in IMDB is effectively bad, when there are thousands of variants (Review Bombicscult series to which the well-mal dichotomy does not feel good or, punch, that many times people are wrong) that question this reasoning. But let’s start from there. The average grade as a canon Parris calculations take, for example, to calculate the average grade of all the episodes of a series. Puts the example of ‘Friends‘, which has an average (quite high) note of 8.34. We can say that this is the intermediate quality point: an episode with more note that will have a greater quality than the majority, with less that quality will be lower. There are series whose first episodes are already around this average note (‘Game of Thrones‘, for example), in other cases the series take to find that average note. The aforementioned ‘Friends’, for example, It does not reach that 8.34 to the seventh episode. Well: Parris calculation consists in taking all IMDB series and Compare the note of each episode with this average grade, and the result is a differential. Most of the series, it seems to be, take six or seven episodes to achieve that average quality. It is clearly appreciated in this graphic Image: Stant significant Is it a lot? Is little? Well, it is a considerable amount of hours, but Parris overlooks a very complicated topic to quantify: the last episodes of a series are better/more interesting/more exciting than the former because … This is how stories work! The first episodes always serve to prepare the way and then have interest. The data we can get from this is: do not trust a statesman to make cultural criticism. But let’s continue. After all, as Parris says, the verySeinfeld‘It took 16 episodes in find your Mojo. How much before I take me? But you can go further, and expand the photo: what if we go to the seasons? Practically All series have a time when interest begins to declinewhere they have been elongated beyond the reasonable, where everything that could be counted has been counted and we entered into argumentary arches that are repeated, characters that no longer have grace, loss of originality, skacuartos spirit and other phenomena that can come to load the memory of a series in its entirety because, again Paradigmatic case of ‘Game of Thrones’ It appears, many times from the end is what people remember the most. Let’s look at this new picture: Image: Stant significant Again using that average note as the base of the quality of a series, we have to in most series there is a change between the fifth and sixth season. From there there is no back. Of course, There are variables: In ‘Game of Thrones’ the greatest fall in the valuations with respect to the first is the eighth season, in ‘House of Cards’ the sixth and in ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ the fourth. They are not necessarily the last seasons, but the most disappointing season. There is no clear rule, but a more or less immutable truth: there is no series that can be prolonged indefinitely. Can conclusions based on mathematics from here be drawn? Well yes and no: It seems more or less reasonable to think that no series can survive foreverbut there are some that after a great quality descent recover something from its initial attraction. The advice that can be removed from this data is: there is no unique solution and applicable to all series, but in general, when you start seeing a decline in quality, leave it. In very, very rare occasions things will be like in that wonderful episode eight of the first season. Header | Warner In Xataka | The 17 best streaming series of 2024 and where to see them

Satya Nadella is clear that at the moment AI has not revolutionized anything. The reason: money

by

“Teach me the pasta!” That is what Satya Nadella wants. That the AI ​​shows the pasta. Give (a lot) money. It is something that Microsoft and Openai have already referred to both. For these companies, AGI’s definition is precisely linked to money, and have established that An AGI will not be an AGI until you give 100,000 million benefit. That argument now serves Microsoft’s CEO to talk about the fact that AI has not revolutionized anything. From agi nothing. In one recent interview With the Dwarkesh Patel podcast, Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, made some important statements in which her position was clear about the current situation of the artificial intelligence segment. To begin with, he indicated that “that we claim that a milestone has been achieved in AGI It is only to hack the meaningless evidence “, that is, to give greater importance to the benchmarks they really have. And of revolution, either. In fact, the best metric to measure the success of the AI ​​segment is simple: it should increase the gross domestic product of any country. “When we say: ‘Oh, this is like the industrial revolution’, we should have that type of growth that caused the industrial revolution. For me, that means 10%, 7%for the developed world. Adjusted to inflation, growing at 5%, that is the real marker.” AI needs a ‘Killer app‘… Nadella commented how that growth has not yet occurred because most users have not yet understood how to use AI effectively. It is the same that happened with the PC, it took time to find its place and demonstrate its potential. … like what Excel and email achieved. Microsoft’s CEO remembered how before the PC, email and spreadsheets, companies made their business forecasts almost handmade: “Faxes circulated, someone received them and then made a memorandum between offices that then circulated, and people introduced figures, and in the end a forecast came out perhaps right in time for the next quarter.” But then Excel arrived and email and revolutionion that type of task, like many others. “That is what we need to happen with AI when it is introduced into jobs in the field of knowledge.” The AI ​​will supervitaminar. The debate on the impact of AI on work is constant, but for Nadella this technology will help us extraordinarily. Thus it will allow any worker to focus on high value tasks, and not on routine tasks that can be automated. He joked talking about the amount of time dedicated to filtering his email, and how to avoid that will be an exceptional time and productivity gain. The AI ​​not only does not give money, but it loses it. The vast majority of large companies that are betting on AI and developing large language models are losing money, and they are also losing it to beast. Openai is the best example of Burn money as if there were no tomorrowbut it is also the best positioned to win that race. But this is a bet. In fact, probably the greatest in history. It is demonstrated by the colossal investments that Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, or Google are doing to create data centers dedicated to AI. All of them will dedicate dozens of millions of dollars to that taskand they will even when it is not clear that AI will be profitable. Of course, these companies believe it will be, and much. Image | Sony Pictures In Xataka | Satya Nadella asked to lower her salary for not having complied with security. Microsoft compensated with 79.1 million

I have detected the exact moment in which things in Marvel began to fail and that has culminated in ‘Captain America’

by

Until the weekend, when the public’s opinion begins to fly over the Internet (which in the end is the one who pays and the one that interests Disney, since the consensus of criticism and public they generated ‘Infinity War‘ and ‘Endey me‘It is unlikely to be repeated again), we will not know if’Captain America: Brave New World‘It is a failure or a triumph. What we can analyze is at what point in the history of MCU Things began to twist. The majority opinion. We can all be more or less agree that there is an MCU stage with a more or less positive balance (which goes from acceptable to the glorious, according to the fan’s enthusiasm) that begins in ‘Iron Man’ and extends until ‘ Endgame ‘. And from there, things began to twist, with stages 4 and 5 mainly disastrous that led to the first Marvel box office failures, to a possible “Superheroic fatigue“And at the time of current uncertainty. But there are nuances. Matiz one: Not the whole field is oregano. 23 films, which is said soon, make up the MCU from ‘Iron Man’ to ‘Endgame’ (well, to ‘Spider-Man: Far from home‘). It is statistically impossible for all to be round, and we cannot even agree on our appreciations. For example, for the signer ‘Iron Man 3’ it is one of the peaks of the MCU, many would say the opposite, and I think it was a mistake that Marvel did not continue to cultivate that way. And there are a multitude of bland films, which are celebrated just because they are in the context of very grossing productions and well considered: ‘Iron Man 2’, ‘Thor: The dark world’ or ‘Avengers: the era of ultron’ are some of them . Matiz two: Not everything is horrible from phase 4. And on the contrary, there are innumerable films (and series) to celebrate from ‘Endgame’: ‘Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of madness‘It is hilarious, and the generally hated’Quantumanía‘ either ‘The Marvels‘They are failed films but with a very claimable personality. And of course, there are multiple remarkable moments in ‘Wandavision‘,’Knight Luna‘ either ‘Agatha, who if not?‘ The authentic problem. The drama of phases 4 and 5 is that they do not have that very pleasant style of the first three stages of going in one direction and with a purpose. Perhaps it became like this, perhaps not, but the feeling that ‘Endgame’ is designed from the first appearance of the Avengers is there, and that does not exist in phases 4 and 5. Of course, there are threads that connect everything, like The theme of the multiversos, but there are many films (‘Shang-Chi‘,’Thor: Love and Thunder‘,’Wakanda Forever‘), which seem to air shots, as looking for new charismatic heroes that replace the Avengers. And as in ‘Brave New World’, the feeling that is a useless effort floats. The movie hinge. And Marvel’s first failure, ‘Eternals‘It is the key point. Marvel had loose films previously, and possibly any did not give up at the box office as they expected, but ‘Eternals’ is the first one that forced them to go back. They wanted the group to become a new avengers, but a team capable of supporting the weight of several films: they raised sub -brains that would last in other films, and new characters seen fleetingly, such as Starfox, of which we did not return namely. Marvel reculled in his plan, and the worst thing is that he saw that he could reculate and the public accepted it, which multiplied the test movies, the ideas that were isolated in a film and the failed experiments. A world that played the mirage of being compact and coherent became one where neglect and carelessness predominates. Header | Disney In Xataka | The first trailer of ‘The fantastic 4: first steps’ reveals the key ingredient for Marvel’s future: its villain

The world pharmaceutical industry has been sunk in its “Deepseek moment”: China is devouring it

by

This summer we estee that, for the first time in history, China beat Europe as a new medication developer. It was not a stroke of luck: the pharmacist is one of the most complex sectors in the world and China has been determined to compete in it at the highest level. A decision that is paying off. So much that, today, the question is not whether China will stand up to the US. The question is whether the western pharmaceutical industry is facing its own “moment Deepseek“: The appearance of a more agile competitor, cheaper and (at least on paper) equally good. A small panoramic. Historically, Europe was always the great world pharmaceutical superpower. However, in the decade that goes between 1995 and 2005, the situation changed: the US made a very strong biomedical commitment and managed to advance the old continent. That has not changed in the last 20 years. In fact, according to the latest edition of the ‘The Pharmaceutical Industry in figures‘(The 2023), they say that the 90 new molecules, 28 were American compared to 17 of European origin. The surprise was another: that China had managed to put 25 on the table. And although that, alone it changes (almost) everything; There was something else. In autumn, summit therapeutics announced that its drug He had surpassed Keytruda, a well -known Merck immunotherapy against lung cancer that moves more than 30,000 million a year. To get an idea of ​​the bombing: only that news catapulted Summit to the top positions of world biotechnology (with a stock market capitalization of billions) even though … it has no approved drug. As David Wainer explained“China’s rise in biotechnology has been managing for years, but now it is impossible to ignore it.” In 2020, less than 5% of the large pharmaceutical transactions worth 50 million dollars or more were related to China. “In 2024, that figure had increased to almost 30%,” According to the journalist. Why does this happen? Although everything has some speculative air, experts agree that There are some key factors behind Of all this: Lower costs: both for the ease of access to highly qualified labor and low cost and access to thousands of people for optimized clinical trials. Minimum bureaucracy and less security obstacles that accelerate the market arrival process. And what consequences can it generate? That may be what most matches all this with What happened to Deep Seek: That the uncertainty about what may be doing in China, makes investors think much more if it is profitable to finance new projects. What is the point of spending hundreds of millions on something they can do in China for a dozen (And what, in fact, are surely doing even if we don’t know it)? And Europe? While innovation seems to go to China, Europe is still changed. Successes like Novo Nordisk and Ozempiceven invisible that we are losing a career that we should not lose (it is more, that we have been losing it for years). Josep Borrellformer high representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, has passed years saying that “When the pandemic arrived we realized that in Europe there was not a single gram of paracetamol.” That was something that did not worry anyone because Europe had always thought it was a problem of productive outsourcing. Now we are discovering that, along the way, we were outsourcing much more than that. Image | Mika Baumeister | Deepseek + Philipp Katzenberger In Xataka | Ozempic is sweeping. So much that it is a problem for supermarkets and sugary drinks

Singer Charli XCX will perform in the movie “The Moment”

by

Charli XCX It was one of the most successful musical artists in 2024, and now It has many film projects, one of these the movie “The Moment”, in which it carries the main role. Charli XCX informs that he did write new songs for Britney Spears Although details about the argument are not known, this is based on an original idea of ​​Charli, who will also produce the tape together with the company A24. The director will be Aidan Zamiriwho wrote the script with Bertie Brandes. By accident, Charli XCX taught one of his breasts in an awards ceremony, but he took it with humor This year, the British singer (whose real name is Charlotte Emma Aitchison) is giving priority to his facet as an actress; will appear in films such as “Faces of Death”, “Sacrifice”, “Erupcja”, “100 Night of Hero”, “Overcompensating”, “I want your sex” and “The Gallery”. She says she has investigated a lot about the film industry to have a good performance as a producer. A few days ago The artists nominated for the Brit Awards were announced, and Charli XCX competes in five categories: Pop artist, artist Dance, song of the year, album of the year and artist of the year. Your most recent album Brat It was a success, occupying number 1 in the United Kingdom and third place on the list Billboard 200. Continue reading: (Tagstotranslate) Charli XCX (T) Famous cinema

Antonio Orozco reveals in ‘Martínez and brothers’ his most embarrassing moment with Luis Fonsi

by

The visit of Antonio Orozco to the program Martinez and Brothers has left moments of confessions. One of the stories that caught the most attention was the one he shared about his great friend Luis Fonsifrom whom, inadvertently, he stole a very special exclusive: announcing the birth of his first daughter. © Four Orozco recounted how it all happened. “It was 2012, we were at some awards in Miami. Luis told me that he was very excited because he was going to be the father of a girl. We celebrated it together and it was a beautiful moment,” he explained. However, what started as a conversation between friends soon turned into one of the most embarrassing moments of his life. The next day, Orozco traveled to Mexico to complete a round of promotional interviews. “In the first interview, the journalist asked me if I had been with Luis Fonsi, and I, excited, began to say that I was happy because I was going to be a father and that I would have a girl. “I didn’t realize I was giving an exclusive!” he commented between laughs. © Four The program team was quick to react, and the news became the headline of the day. “At that moment I froze. It was something completely involuntary. I called Luis and said, ‘I think I just cost you a lot of money.’ He replied: ‘Don’t worry, friend,’” he recalled. Although Fonsi showed his understanding, Orozco assures that he did not remain calm. Since then, he has not stopped apologizing. “I have bought him guitars, I have sent him ham… To this day I continue to compensate him!”, he confessed during his intervention on the program Dani Martínez. © Four This anecdote, which at the time caused remorse, is now an example of the friendship that unites both artists. But this was not the only story that Orozco shared in Martínez and Brothers. He also talked about a night with Alejandro Fernandez and his father, Vicente Fernández. At five in the morning, Alejandro asked him to sing I’m made of little pieces of you as a tribute to his father on his birthday. “It was one of the most special moments of my life”He said excitedly. © Four Antonio Orozco’s time on the program made it clear that, in addition to being a talented artist, he is a true friend. His confessions in Martinez and Brothers They reminded us that even “mistakes” can become good stories when there is friendship involved. Because if something defines Orozco, it is his ability to celebrate every moment, even the most embarrassing ones, with his heart in his hand.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.