Bugatti once again defies the laws of physics. This time with a 250,000 euro stabilized pool table for luxury yachts

There are Bugatti customers who are not satisfied with having a hypercar in the garagethey also want a Bugatti on the yacht. Having it does not always mean having to get a car several million dollars on board (although some have no problem doing it), sometimes the answer is a pool table. But not just any table. A pool table that defies the laws of physics and of the tidesstaying flat while you play, even if the ship moves. And it does so with the same technical obsession and extreme care for every detail that Bugatti puts into each one. their supercars. Solution to a very specific problem. Playing pool on a yacht may seem simple until you realize that you are on a structure that never stops rocking. Therefore, it would be impossible to play a game without the balls starting to roll by themselves to the sound of the swaying waves. That was the real problem that Bugatti wanted to solve. Superyacht owners wanted a pool table on board, but the swell made it almost impossible. The result is called Bugatti Pool Table and is part of Bugatti Lifestyle, the brand’s luxury objects division, which has also launched luxury watches and even televisions that look like a sculpture. The table was manufactured in a limited edition of only 30 units and its price starts at 250,000 euros with accessories included. In addition, it meets the specifications of a table approved for professional competition. The technology that wins the battle against the waves. The heart of the invention is a gyroscopic system that detects any inclination of the boat instantly. When the waves move the boat, servomotors correct the position of each leg to keep the table surface completely horizontal. According to the brand, “the sensors carry out the measurement and order the correction in just five milliseconds” so the balls are not influenced by the swing of the tide. Everything happens silently, without perceptible vibrations. This type of stabilization is reminiscent of the boat stabilizerswhich reduce hull roll with gyroscopes or moving fins. Bugatti applied a similar idea, but on the scale of a table. This way the balls stay still where you leave them. A Galician with a French accent. Although the table is signed by the French supercar manufacturer, the design was actually developed in Vigo. The company in charge is IXOa Galician firm specialized in carbon fiber that also works for the aeronautical industry, and has repaired Ferrari and Lamborghini bodies. Its founder, Pedro Sánchez, assures that “We have not skimped on anything; everything has been risked and sacrificed to create something unimaginable.” The table structure combines carbon fiber with CNC machined aluminum. The screws and nuts are made of titanium, designed to resist corrosion in the marine environment. The embrasures are made of stainless steel covered in leather. Each table also has a numbered plate, just like the cars at the Atelier de Molsheim. No two tables are the same. Accessories that cost more than a car. The table does not arrive alone. The pack includes a matching carbon fiber cue holder, with a 13-inch touch screen for keeping score. It also has an adjustable LED lamp and a leather suitcase to store the balls. Those balls, by the way, are signed Aramith Tournament Prothe Belgian brand that makes the standard used by most professional tournaments. In addition, each table includes a USB memory with photos and videos of its manufacturing process, stored in a machined aluminum box. This attention to detail turns a simple game of pool into an exercise in pure engineering, extreme luxury and enormous financial muscle. First to buy a yacht, and then to decorate it with a billiard table signed by Bugatti. In Xataka | In 1995, one of the most iconic Bugatti in history mysteriously disappeared. Now it has appeared again Image | Unsplash (jericaglasserphoto)

why 3 euro cardboard glasses protect your eyes from an eclipse better than 100 euro sunglasses

If you have in mind see the solar eclipse this August 12you may have already started searching approved glasses. Many shops they have jumped on the car and they are launching offers at a very reduced price. Although the truth is that, honestly, it is not necessary to lower the cost much, since the price of eclipse glasses is extremely cheap. And of course, for some people, it is very shocking, since they insist actively and passively that conventional sunglasses do not work for us, but how can my 100-euro Ray-Ban not be worth it and some cardboard glasses that cost me 3 are worth it? With this, as with many things in life, we see that price is not everything. They are not lying to us when they tell us that sunglasses are worthless. They also don’t scam us by selling us eclipse glasses for only 3 euros. The inflated prices of brand name sunglasses can sometimes hurt us like a scam, although everyone is free to set the prices for their brand that they see fit. But let’s focus on the science of approved glasses. How can something so technically necessary be so cheap to produce? There is not so much technical complexity. Eclipse glasses are designed to be used once in a very long time, if at all. Normally, the person who wears them just look at the sky and, at most, around it. You don’t have to drive, walk, or read anything. You just stop and look at the Sun. For this reason, all you need is a very basic frame, sometimes made of cardboard, and two filters, one for each eye. Sunglasses, on the other hand, must be functional, which requires greater technical complexity. If they are graduated, It is necessary that they have an adequate curvature. This is not necessary in itself for non-prescription sunglasses, but it is often also done to give them a more enveloping effect, especially if they are aimed at sports. On the other hand, the glass of the sunglasses is carved, polished and treated to improve visibility and prevent scratches. For this reason, their manufacture is more expensive, while the price of eclipse glasses is very low. Simple but essential filters. The really important thing about approved eclipse glasses is that they have good filters. These must comply with the regulations EN ISO 12312-2:2015which ensures that no more than 0.00032% of visible sunlight is allowed to pass through. Sunglasses, on the other hand, are designed to avoid indirect damage, but not to look directly at the Sun, so a transmittance of 3% is sufficient in the highest protection categories. The filters used to achieve this great light blocking in eclipse glasses are manufactured with a black polymer or resin with carbon particles. The most used polymer is reflective Mylar.. Then, on top of the polymer, they have thin layers of aluminum, chrome or silver, which help optimize filtering. They are not difficult materials to obtain in the necessary quantities, so the final price is not exorbitant. There is no exclusivity, another reason for the price of eclipse glasses. Even if cheap materials are used, the filter still costs money. The thing is that, unlike what usually happens with sunglasses, eclipse glasses are usually produced on very large scales. Exclusivity is not sought nor does anything happen because there are many identical glasses. That, in the end, reduces costs a lot. Furthermore, with sunglasses we often pay for the brand and that is something that, logically, does not matter with glasses approved for viewing the eclipse. Even given as gifts. Producing these glasses is so cheap that some brands, businesses and institutions are already giving them away to ensure that we all see the eclipse on August 12 safely. In Spain, this will be the first of three eclipses in three consecutive years; So, contrary to usual, you will need these glasses again very soon. Whatever you buy, don’t get rid of them. Of course, if you see that the filter is broken or scratched, the protective metal layers may be damaged and good filtering is no longer guaranteed. In that case, buy others. After all, they are justifiably very cheap. Image | Magnific/NASA In Xataka | A third of Spain will be completely dark for a minute or two. The astronomical event of the century is approaching

Lidl sells out its 45 euro evaporative air conditioner. We have found a very similar and cheaper alternative

Lidl has many products in its bazaar, and some of them are hard to believe are sold in the online store or in physical stores (I still remember seeing an electric guitar many years ago). Now that we are going through a very hot time, it is logical that we find devices aimed at combating it, as is the case of the Tronic air conditioner which has a price of 44.99 euros. The price is so attractive that right now it is out of stock in the online store and the supermarket does not mention whether it will replace new units. However, on Amazon there is a very similar air conditioner that is even cheaper: it is the Cecotec EnergySilence 3500 Cool Compact what does it cost 39.90 euros. Cecotec EnergySilence 3500 Cool Compact The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Two air conditioners with an excellent quality-price ratio Tronic air conditioning (left) and Cecotec air conditioning (right). We are talking about two air conditioners that are quite similar, even in design. The one from Cecotec, which is the one that is available in stores, offers the same 65W powera low figure but enough to relieve us from the summer heat, especially when using water or the two coolers that are included (like the one from Lidl). The most important difference is in the tank: the Lidl one has four liters, while the Cecotec one has a 3.5 liter tank. As you can see, the difference is not too big and, in practice, we are going to have a very similar experience. The Cecotec air conditioner incorporates a button panel at the top that is quite intuitive. It includes three speeds to regulate the intensity of the air flow and offers an automatic 70º oscillation. Furthermore, the good thing is that incorporates wheelsso it can be moved from one room to another comfortably and quickly. ⚡ IN SUMMARY: Cecotec EnergySilence 3500 Cool Compact offer today ✅ THE BEST Its price: This is an air conditioner that stands out above all for how cheap it is. Your button boxwhich is very intuitive to select the different speed modes. The wheelswhich allow the air conditioner to be moved from one room to another. ❌ THE WORST The water tankwhich with 3.5 liters will not be enough to use it for many hours in a row. 💡 BUY IT IF… You are looking for a very economical air conditioner to use in the office or bedroom for a while. ⛔ DON’T BUY IT IF… You want to use the air conditioner for many hours (such as sleeping), since for this it is recommended that the tank have a capacity of between five and eight liters. You may also be interested Orbegozo AIR 45 – 3-in-1 evaporative air conditioner, 3 speeds, directional fins, 4 l tank, removable filter, 60 W The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Orbegozo AIR 55, Evaporative air conditioning, 3 ventilation speeds, 150 W, maximum timer 12 hours, oscillating interior slats, pivoting wheels, 35 L tank, black and white color The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Lidl and Compradicción (header), Cecotec In Xataka | Best portable air conditioner. Which one to buy and seven recommended penguins In Xataka | Best evaporative air conditioners. Buying guide, opinions and best models from 50 euros

“Leaving the air conditioning on all night can cost around a euro in electricity”

The torrid nights with thermometers that refuse to drop below 25 degrees are already here with us, with several heat waves that we have suffered in a chained way. At these moments you may think about the possibility of using the air conditioning at night, but the fear of the amount that will arrive on the electricity bill is always there. But the reality is that there are situations where this expense is not so exorbitant. Exorbitant consumption. Leaving the air on for eight hours of sleep can cost us around one euro. This is how Carlos Llull, air conditioning technician, explains it. who points out thatin an average scenario with modern equipment, the economic impact is much less than we usually imagine. Through a publication On his Instagram account, which has gone viral, he pointed out that “leaving the air conditioning on for 8 hours at night can cost around one euro in electricity.” And there are more voices. Beyond this phrase that can give us peace of mind in our pockets, Álex Bermúdez, energy expert, reduces This figure is even further stated by stating that, depending on the programmed degrees and the thermal characteristics of the room, the cost of an entire night can be barely around 0.45 euros. But with these gurus announcing this, the question is obvious: How is it possible if a domestic air conditioner usually has an installed power of between 1,000 and 2,000 W? And the answer is in the inverter systems of the most modern equipment. The mathematics. If we use logic, it is quite simple to calculate the consumption of an air conditioner, since it ‘simply’ multiplies the maximum power of the device by the eight hours that it can be kept on during the night. And this would only be correct if you literally lived in an oven without windows and the equipment had to work at its maximum constantly, something that does not happen in most cases. Modern inverter compressors do not work with an obsolete binary on/off system, but their motor is capable of self-regulation when starting at high power to reach the desired temperature, but once achieved, it modulates its work and drastically reduces the revolutions to simply maintain the environment. This means that, during most of the early morning hours, and helped by the fact that the outside temperature also drops, the equipment barely consumes a minimal fraction of its maximum capacity. It depends on several factors. Of course, that euro per night is not a guaranteed flat rate, but rather a measurement that depends on a delicate thermodynamic balance in your home. The first of them is the set temperature, since, as the IDAE runsthe ideal temperature in summer should be between 23 and 26 ºC. Each degree lowered will mean an increase of between 6 and 8% in energy consumption. Insulation is also essential, since a room with thermal leaks, as can occur with old windows, will lose cold quickly, forcing the compressor to exit its maintenance mode and work at higher power throughout the night. The energy rate. This is a fundamental factor, since the final cost of using the air at night will vary depending on whether the rate is in the regulated marketwhere early morning prices can be very low, or if you have a free market rate with an agreed kWh price. Optimize consumption. As the OCU points outit is important not to turn on the air at the minimum temperature to “cool quickly”, since it is inefficient, and that is why it should always be programmed from the beginning to the desired temperature. But in addition, you must take advantage of the ‘ECO’ or ‘Sleep’ mode that many air conditioners already include so that the temperature is gradually adjusted throughout the early morning. Images | Zulfugar Karimov In Xataka | What is energy efficiency and why is it a saving that matters more than ever?

Players celebrate that ‘GTA VI’ will cost 80 euros. It turns out that only the 100 euro ‘special’ is the entire game

‘GTA VI‘ is the topic of the week in video games. Of the year, if you hurry me. The Rockstar title is a generational game and today reservations are open to get a digital version or a box that Does not include the game in physical format. That is, precisely, one of the controversies, but not the only one. The other has to do with the price. We have had rumors and leaks for months suggesting that ‘GTA VI’ was going to be the 100 euro game. Nintendo came close with the 90 euros of the ‘Mario Kart World‘, but many eyes were still on that ‘GTA VI’ whose development has been so monumental and expensive that it seemed to justify a considerable increase in price. In the end, it turned out that the game arrives for 80 euros in its standard version. But the twist is that there is a 100 euro version, one called ‘Ultimate’ that doesn’t feel like an ‘Ultimate’ edition: feels like the real ‘GTA VI’. Because this edition is not a collection of skins, as happens in other games: they are content that is unlocked as we progress through the game and are “threaded in all aspects of the story” of its protagonists, according to Rockstar itself. And it ranges from exclusive stores, items for the protagonists, vehicles of all kinds and some missions. The key to the Ultimate edition of ‘GTA VI’ On the website, Rockstar describes this edition as follows: “Welcome to Leonida, the state where anything goes. Get everything this vast world has to offer with Grand Theft Auto VI: Ultimate Edition, an exclusive collection of premium vehicles, weapons, fashion and action galore. The Ultimate Edition’s bonus content runs through Jason and Lucia’s story, discovering new items in each chapter.” We are used to the fact that when a game comes out in two editions, we have the full experience in the base edition and then an ‘Ultimate’ or ‘Complete’ edition that includes a code with skins. There may be some other element such as a vehicle or a couple of exclusive weapons, but in the end it is nothing that alters the experience too much. These contents are usually unlocked from the beginning of the adventure if we enter the code, but In the case of ‘GTA VI Ultimate’ things seem slightly different. As the company has commented, these new contents will be unlocked not all at once, but as we complete steps in the adventures of its protagonists. And that, with my experience as a player, sounds to me like content that has always been unlocked as we played, without having to pay anything else, but that now they want to pass off as additional content. Because yes, we have some different weapons, vehicles, tattoos, hairstyles and outfits, but also two car modification workshops, a new safe house in one of the areas, a store that only opens with this version and what seems like a mission or event in which we can raid the warehouse of a gang in the city to recover their merchandise. As I say, all of that sounds to me like content that, In another era, we would have been achieving with the normal course of the adventure. And for this reason, precisely, it gives rise to thinking that the ‘GTA VI’ that they had in mind from the beginning was the one for 100 euros, and that this so-called ‘Ultimate Edition’ is nothing more than the standard version, but with a cut version for 80 euros so as not to be ‘GTA’ the saga that raised the games to the 100 euro barrier. Because, in the end, no matter how much of a ‘GTA’ you are, the price of a video game matters. For example, the one that got involved when PS5 raised the price of some games up to 80 euros or when Nintendo did it a year ago with 90 euros. In fact, Rockstar must be quite happy with Nintendo for the 90 euros of ‘Mario Kart World’. And, speaking of Nintendo, another detail that gives rise to thinking that the ‘GTA VI’ “really” is the 100 euro one is the one that was set up when Nintendo launched ‘Donkey Kong Bananza‘ for 80 euros and, just a month later, it released a DLC that they most likely already had prepared for the original launch, but costing 20 euros. In practice, whoever wanted the complete game ‘dropped’ 100 euros in just a month and a half. But hey, price and controversies aside, ‘GTA VI’ is going to be a generational game. Rockstar has been cooking this work for more than a decade, which has become, possibly, the most expensive entertainment product ever created. It is a game that will not leave anyone indifferent and that, without really having many details about it, fills rivers of digital ink and a lot of content on YouTube. It also seems that they want to get rid of all the negative aspects as soon as possible so that the launch on November 19 goes as smoothly as possible. Although Rockstar must deal not only with issues such as price or differences between versions, but with much more serious things such as the denounced treatment of its workers and their rights. And if Reddit is a thermometer, it is neither hot nor cold, with users defending the decision and others questioning, precisely, that content is blocked. In Xataka | There are more and more physical video games that are paperweights. It is a tremendous problem for video games as art.

that 20 euro flights are a relic of the past

During the great oil crisis In the 1970s, several US airlines began do something unusual to save fuel: deliberately reduce speed in mid-flight. Some They even eliminated olives of the salads served on board because every extra kilo mattered when kerosene prices skyrocketed. Half a century later, the airline industry is once again discovering the extent to which a distant energy conflict can transform something as everyday as getting on a plane. Goodbye to flying “cheap”. For more than two decades, Europe got used to it to something that would have seemed absurd in any other era: crossing the continent for less money than it costs to park your car at an airport. The low cost airlines They transformed the plane into an everyday means of transportation and normalized impromptu getaways, whirlwind weekends, and vacations designed around ridiculously cheap tickets. It so happens that the war around Iran is beginning to put into question precisely that model. He Closing of Hormuzthe brutal increase in the price of kerosene and the interruption of routes are hitting the economic heart of commercial aviation. And little by little an uncomfortable idea is beginning to emerge for the European consumer: those 20 euro flights that seemed eternal could have been a historical anomaly much more fragile than it seemed. Hormuz on the plane ticket. The Financial Times said this week that the connection between a conflict in the Middle East and a cheap flight between European cities seems distant until fuel starts to run out. Near the 40% of kerosene that Europe uses passes through the Strait of Hormuz, now converted into one of the main energy bottlenecks on the planet. The war has duplicated the global price of aviation fuel and forced to cancel tens of thousands of flights that simply became unprofitable. Some airlines have started even to carry out truly desperate logistical maneuvers to refuel in other countries or avoid certain routes. The problem is especially delicate because, even before the crisis, fuel was already the higher operating cost from any airline. When kerosene skyrockets, the entire financial architecture of the low-cost model begins to falter. Natural selection in war. Because commercial aviation has always been a brutally competitive industry with minimal margins, but the conflict with Iran is accelerating a consolidation process which had been occurring for years. There we have as a first reference the Spirit Airlines bankruptcywhich has been interpreted by many executives as the beginning of a new wave of mergers, disappearances and cuts. Weaker airlines, especially those focused on ultra-cheap fares, are beginning to face a scenario where maintaining extremely low prices can stop being viable. Even giants like Ryanair, easyJet or Wizz Air They watch with concern How rising fuel prices threaten the core appeal of your business. The problem is structural: no executive really wants to sell cheap tickets; wants to fill planes generating profits. And the less competition that survives the crisis, the easier it will be raise rates without fear of losing passengers. Flying expensive, again. For years, the expansion of low cost created the feeling that flying cheap was something natural and irreversible. But much of this phenomenon depended on a extremely delicate balance: relatively affordable fuel, enormous competition between companies, cheap secondary airports and a constant availability of efficient aircraft. The war is simultaneously eroding several of those pillars. Manufacturers such as Boeing or Airbus delays accumulate on deliveries, airlines are removing old models that consume too much and many routes are beginning to become economically unviable. Even historical giants such as Lufthansa or Air France-KLM already they are cutting thousands of flights to reduce costs. The worrying thing is that many of these measures could be maintained even after the conflict, consolidating a smaller, more concentrated industry with fewer incentives to maintain ultra-low rates. The new aerial geography. The crisis also threatens to redraw part of the world aviation map. For years, hubs like Dubai or Doha became authentic nerve centers that connected Europe and Asia thanks to abundant fuel, optimized routes and giants like Emirates or Qatar Airways. The war has hit precisely that network. Airspace closures, mass cancellations and supply problems have meant that many direct routes between Asia and Europe they fill even despite strong price increases. Some European companies are temporarily taking advantage of this situation, but everyone knows that when the Gulf airlines regain capacity they will start again a tariff war aggressive The difference is that this time they will do it in a context where fuel can remain expensive for a long time. The real problem: winter. Because summer still offers some room for maneuver as planes fly full and holidays sustain demand even with higher prices. But the industry’s real fear is what may happen next. If the conflict continues, energy prices remain high and airlines begin to exhaust their financial coverage on fuel, many winter routes they could disappear directly. That would open a dangerous spiral: fewer flights imply fixed costs that are more difficult to distribute, which forces prices to rise even further and further reduces demand. The risk is to end up entering a dynamic where low-cost travel stops being the dominant standard and once again becomes something much more limitedseasonal and expensive. In other words, the war in Iran is beginning to remind the West of something it had forgotten: behind every cheap 20-euro flight there was always abundant oil and geopolitical stability. And neither of those things seem guaranteed right now. Image | Pexels, Picryl, Picryl In Xataka | European airlines are taking advantage of the Iran crisis to accelerate something old: making your trip even more complicated. In Xataka | Iran is about to start another war: to buy a plane ticket before it costs a kidney

Your price increases are illegal and you must return the money. There are those who will receive a 500 euro refund

We ended last March with news: Netflix the price went up again. It is true that the measure applies exclusively to the United States, but taking into account that it is already its umpteenth time, we know its modus operandi: it is the canary in the mine of a probable global rise that will also affect Europe. And despite saying that it has been the umpteenth price increase for Netflix, it always comes as a bit of a surprise: after all, it is the second price increase in just two years. However, it is the clear trend in the sector. Paradoxically, just a few days later, a court in Rome has issued a historic ruling against Ted Sarandos’ platform: declare Netflix’s price increases between 2017 and 2024 illegal. The sentence. The Roman court has declared that the contractual clauses that allow Netflix to unilaterally modify its prices and conditions of service without indicating a justified reason are void and contrary to the Italian Consumer Code. The ruling covers price increases applied between 2017 and January 2024, that is, subscription price increases implemented in 2017, 2019, 2021 and November 2024 (unless your contractual relationship with the platform was after January 2024). As a consequence, it recognizes the right of those who have a subscription on the platform to a reduction in the current price of the subscription, to the refund of amounts unduly paid and to compensation for damages. In addition, it forces Netflix to publish the content of the ruling on its website and in the main national newspapers. within 90 daysas well as to inform its users. Why is it important. Because it establishes a relevant legal precedent in Europe: streaming platforms cannot raise prices arbitrarily and unilaterally based on generic clauses. It is not that Netflix cannot raise its prices (like any other company), but that it did so without contractual justification, which the court considers an abuse. This ruling lays the foundations to demand from digital platforms more transparency and rigor in their contracts with consumers. Context. The lawsuit comes from the Movimento Consumitori association (Italian consumers), which brought the case before the Court of Rome denouncing continued price increases from Netflix without explanation. Italian law requires that, if a company reserves the right to unilaterally modify a contract (ius variandi), you must specify from the beginning what causes could justify that change. Netflix did not do this: its contracts simply said that it could change the price whenever it wanted without giving reasons, the critical clauses are 3.5 and 6.4. The court considers that giving 30 days’ notice and allowing cancellation is not enough since when someone subscribes to the platform they do not know under what conditions the service may become more expensive. In April 2025 Netflix modified its terms of use linking possible changes to specific causes, such as service improvements, regulatory demands or technological requirements. How it affects users. Each subscribed person will have the right to a reduction in the current price, to a refund of more in that period and to compensation, which according to the Italian consumer association must be made spontaneously, although you can join the class action lawsuit in case that is not the case. The ruling requires Netflix to reduce the prices of its current subscriptions by an amount equal to the illegal increases. We see it better with an example: if you are premium and activated your subscription in 2017, today you pay 19.99 euros but you are entitled to the service for 11.99 euros. If you are a standard customer, you would go from paying 13.99 euros to 9.99 euros. And be careful, because this measure applies both to those who currently have a subscription and to former customers within that period. Up to 500 euros refund. MC lawyers explainPaolo Fiorio and Corrado Pinna, that for the premium plan, the illegal increases applied in 2017, 2019, 2021 and 2024 amount to 8 euros per month, for the standard plan they add up to a total of 4 euros per month and for the basic, 2 euros per month. Thus, a premium customer who has paid Netflix continuously from 2017 to today is entitled to a refund of approximately 500 euros, while a standard rate customer is entitled to a refund of approximately 250 euros. Italy is the tip of the iceberg. Although the case has been reported in Italy, in other countries on the old continent there are also lawsuits filed against the platform: Netherlands also has a demand similar budding, FACUA reported it in Spain (yes ok still no progress) and in Germany the European Audiovisual Observatory echoes that the courts of Berlin and Cologne have already ruled in the same direction. The basis is the same in all cases: the European Directive 93/13/EECwhich prohibits abusive clauses that generate a significant imbalance between the rights of the company and those of the consumer. Netflix’s reaction. Immediately after learning of the Roman ruling, the platform declared its intention to appeal: “We will appeal the decision. At Netflix, our subscribers come first. We take consumer rights very seriously and we believe that our conditions have always been in line with Italian regulations and practices,” as reported by Reuters. The appeal could modify or even reverse the ruling, so the case is not closed. However, the pressure on Netflix and the reputational damage has already been done. Netflix has always been the vanguard of the sector, so the future of this litigation could mark a before and after in the streaming sector. In Xataka | The best new movies and series to watch in April 2026 on Netflix, Prime Video, HBO Max and streaming In Xataka | Netflix’s umpteenth price increase illustrates a reality: streaming is already as expensive as what it came to improve Cover | KATRIN BOLOVTSOVA

you have a trial month for only 1 euro

If you think about it, it’s normal that on a normal day you use many Google services. Email or Google Drive are two common examples in these cases, since they are two very useful and used tools. Now, as happens with social networks and other apps, all these services They are owned by a large US company. And more and more users are seeking to depend on them as little as possible. Are there quality European alternatives? The reality is that yes and one of them is offered to us by Proton. Although it is free, we have the opportunity to try what the paid version of Proton Mail offers for only 1 euro. If you are looking for cloud storage, you have exactly the same promo for Proton Drive: one month of 200 GB of storage costs 1 euro. It is important to note that we can only use this promo with one plan or another. Proton Drive (the first month) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Proton also has discounts on its annual plans The incentive of being a European service is nice, but it’s not the only thing that makes Proton worth it. This company bases its business model solely on subscriptions for its services, so it does not sell data to third parties. This, together with the fact that it offers end-to-end encryption in all its tools, makes it so that no one but us can access our data. In fact, not even Proton itself can. Proton mail service, Proton Mailit is open source. What does that mean? That anyone can audit it, lor which translates into being transparent and it does not have any type of back door so that no one can extract our information. In addition, it has a system so that we can quickly transfer emails, contacts or calendars from our current provider to Proton Mail. Proton Mail (the first month) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Proton Drive continues in the same line. With this 1 month trial we will have 200 GB so that we can save photos, videos or documents and access them from wherever we want. In addition, we can also share them with whoever we want through a link, being able to set passwords or even a date for the link to “expire.” All without forgetting that it also includes both Proton Docs and Proton Sheets. Coming back to this offer, Both services offer us a first month for 1 euro. This test is perfect to test them and decide whether or not we want to continue with them and pay the 4.99 euros they have from the second month. Now, if we want to bet on them more in the long term, right now we have a 40% discount on both services for their annual modality during the first year, looking like this: One year of Proton Drive: 2.99 euros per month (a total of 35.92 euros). One year of Proton Mail: 2.99 euros per month (a total of 35.92 euros). Proton Unlimited (one year) The price could vary. We earn commission from these links What if we are interested in both services? So, The most profitable thing is to go towards Proton Unlimited. This plan not only includes 500 GB of storage with Proton Drive and Proton Mail, but also comes with a VPN, password manager and even online office automation. The best thing is that it is also on sale right now: with its annual modality, its price is 8.99 euros per month (for which we would pay a total of 107.88 euros). Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Proton In Xataka | Best VPNs 2025: guide with the 17 best services to protect your online privacy In Xataka | Google Drive alternatives: the best cloud storage services for your files

when you need to buy the most expensive cable and when the 5 euro one is worth it

You go to a store like Amazon and type ‘HDMI cable’ in the search engine. The results show a lot of options and all, at a glance, they are almost identicalyes. Yes, there are braided cables, cables of different lengths, or you can even find cables of other colors, but there doesn’t seem to be much difference between them all. Despite this, there are very cheap cables and others that cost more than 20 euros. Your first impulse may be to go for the cheapest one that has the meters you need. Ideally, you should spend a moment on the details, since the cheapest ones are usually HDMI 2.0, while the most expensive ones are HDMI 2.1. What does that mean for you? Let’s take a look at it so you know if it’s worth investing a little more or if one of these cheap cables works for you. Choosing an HDMI 2.1 cable In short, HDMI 2.1 cable is better. The main difference between this and HDMI 2.0 is that it has greater bandwidth (more than double, in fact). In practice, this means that the cable can handle and transport more information per second. Since we are talking about an HDMI cable, we are referring to image and sound. Precisely because it has more bandwidth, this cable can move higher resolution at higher hertz. It is the right one if you plan to see 8K resolution content (although for commercial 8K content there is still) or if you are looking to play something at 4K at 120 Hz. The latter is what leads many people to go for one of these cables because it is the way to get the most out of a PlayStation 5 or one Xbox Series X. To the greater bandwidth of this cable, we must add some technologies such as dynamic HDR or others that are also great for video games and that are not present in HDMI 2.0. The most important one is called VRR (either Variable Refresh Rate), which basically makes the console or PC and the TV “agree” so that the image does not jerk. We have two examples of VRR with two technologies that are usually present in many monitors, such as NVIDIA G-Sync or AMD FreeSync. There is also ALLM, which makes the TV’s Game Mode activate automatically when you connect the console. This is very convenient because it will save you from doing it manually every time, but it is great when playing because reduce latency. That is, it minimizes the time that passes between you pressing a button and the action being displayed on the screen. For competitive games it is key. If you have a good sound bar for TV at home and you want to connect it via HDMI, then choosing an HDMI 2.1 cable may be a good idea. Here comes into play what is called eARCwhich allows you to command uncompressed audio in the highest quality from the TV. Where is the “but”? So that all these things that we tell you are worth something, It is necessary that both the TV and the console or PC are compatible. You can use the cable if they are not, but you will have spent more money and you will not be taking advantage of it. The good thing is that check if your TV or monitor has HDMI 2.1 It’s not difficult. Choose an HDMI 2.0 cable The best cable doesn’t have to be what you need. The HDMI 2.0 cable has less bandwidth, as we said above, but it is still more than enough for 4K and 60 Hz content. This combination, today, is the most common when playing with all consoles. Plus, it still supports HDR. For this reason, it can be great for consoles from previous generations (PlayStation 4 or Nintendo Switch, for example) or for a TV Box. Another asset that this HDMI 2.0 cable has: the price. Generally, this type of cable It is significantly cheaper than HDMI 2.1. That, which is great for our pocket, also allows us to buy one of better quality without having to spend a good pinch. Because yes, the quality of the cable or connector matters (a lot). And the distance, because the longer the cable is, the more likely it is to suffer losses or interference. What is the main drawback of this cable? May it become obsolete soon. If you don’t plan to change your TV or console right now, HDMI 2.0 is perfect. Now, when you switch to a newer device that supports HDMI 2.1, you will have to buy a new cable if you want higher resolution and more fps. In other words: if renewing consoles or TVs in the short or medium term is on your mind, buy an HDMI 2.1 directly. The good and the bad of both options, face to face HDMI 2.1 HDMI 2.0 THE GOOD 🟢 It reaches up to 8K and 60 Hz (or 4K and 120 Hz) and has exclusive technologies It’s cheaper and still capable with 4K and 60 Hz THE BAD 🔴 It is more expensive and you will not get the most out of it if your TV is not compatible It will soon become obsolete if you plan to renew your TV or console. Ideal for: Play at higher fps and higher resolution with a PS5 or Xbox Series X and to play audio in the best quality Consoles from past generations or watch movies, series and football if you don’t have an 8K TV We do the math to see which one can compensate you more. Both options have their advantages and disadvantages, so now let’s see which one may interest you more depending on which cases. Here it will depend a little on what you are looking for, but especially on What TV or monitor are you going to use the cable for?. The advantages in resolution, Hz and technologies of HDMI 2.1 are obvious, … Read more

In 2013, WhatsApp cost almost one euro. And nothing prevents Meta from charging for the app again in 2026

There was a time when WhatsApp was paid. This was more than ten years ago, before Goal was done with the application and ended up completely changing its structure over time. The latest beta of the app leaks something that seemed inevitable after the arrival of the announcements: a paid subscription to avoid them. He leak. WhatsApp has two versions, the stable and the beta. It is common for the code of the next beta versions to be leaked, giving us a preview of the functions that will end up reaching the final app. And the latest leak points in a very specific direction. Since you recently removed your WhatsApp account from your Accounts Center, the price of your subscription for no ads in Status & Channels has decreased. Review your subscription to accept the new price of %1$s/month; or choose to use Status & Channels free of charge with ads. Additionally, Android Authority has managed to force the code so that the app displays a message in its interface about the possibility of canceling the subscription. WHATSAPP Tricks and tips to HIDE YOURSELF TO THE MAXIMUM and maintain your PRIVACY A plausible hypothesis. So far, practically all the WhatsApp code leaks have ended up materializing: either as functions tested in the beta version, or as features that have ended up reaching the final version. One of them has been the introduction of advertising in the app, which for now is limited to statuses, promotional channels and channel subscriptions. In the case of states, the operation is very similar to what Meta applies on Instagram, interspersing ads every certain number of publications. So… what if I don’t want ads? What do you give me in exchange?. If Meta wants to implement a subscription system with any modicum of success, it will have to offer more than just removing ads in return. The subscription opens the door to new WhatsApp functions, and a business model similar to that of Telegram with its premium version. One in which the app can continue to be used without any inconvenience in the free version, but which opens the door to benefits and a better experience if we check out. Because. If the question is why Meta may intend to charge you for WhatsApp, the answer is very easy: it needs money. In 2014, Facebook paid nearly $1 billion for WhatsApp. Almost 10 years later, He had barely recovered 10% of what he paid for it.. The company continues to need ways to make the investment profitable, and betting on a subscription model is a necessary plan. Image | Xataka Mobile In Xataka | WhatsApp Web: What it is, how it is used and comparison with the mobile app

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.