In the era of drones and smart missiles, the US has recovered a relic of the First World War: the bayonet

In the middle of the Iraq war, a group of British soldiers launched a bayonet charge against Iraqi militiamen near Al Amara. The scene seemed like something out of another century, but the British Army considered it a tactical success in the middle of a modern combat already marked by night vision, digital communications and advanced weaponry. The unexpected return of the bayonet. More than 20 years have passed since the scene described, but they counted in a report in Insider that, in an era dominated by FPV drones, electronic warfare, artificial intelligence and guided missiles, the United States Army has decided to bring back something that seems straight out of the trenches of World War I: indeed, the bayonet. The US Army Ranger School, one of the toughest training programs on the planet, has incorporated new hand-to-hand assaults with this war tool within its extreme combat circuits. As? Apparently, soldiers must advance through smoke, tunnels, trenches and physical obstacles while attacking humanoid targets with knives mounted on the end of the rifle. At first glance it seems like an absurd military anachronism in the digital age. However, for the Pentagon the decision responds precisely to the type of war What do you think can happen? in the future. The Pentagon obsession. The war in Ukraine and other recent conflicts have shown something which is of great concern to Western military strategists: modern battlefields depend on extremely vulnerable networks, communications, GPS, drones and electronic sensors. Jamming, electronic warfare attacks, and combat chaos can isolate entire units in a matter of minutes. In this scenario, the US Army fears that soldiers accustomed to operating surrounded by technology lose capacity to continue fighting when screens, communications or air support disappear. That’s why Ranger School now insists on training something a lot. most basic and brutal: move forward, endure fear, maintain physical cohesion with teammates and continue attacking even in extreme situations of exhaustion and disorientation. A relic that never disappeared. The truth is that, although the bayonet is associated above all to suicidal charges of the First World War, never completely disappeared of modern armies. American troops still used it in Korea and Vietnamand British soldiers and US Marines set it again during particularly violent urban combat in Iraq in 2004. Its current value is not so much in the weapon itself as in what it represents psychologically. Military historians have been pointing out for years that the bayonet works especially like a tool to train aggression, discipline and the ability to continue fighting under extreme fear. It forces the soldier to accept something that modern technological warfare sometimes hides: that many combats still end at very short distances and in deeply chaotic conditions. Recovering very old ideas. The movement is especially striking because it arrives just when the war seems more futuristic than ever. Ukraine and Russia have filled the front autonomous droneselectronic interference and constant surveillance from the air. But precisely that same technological saturation is producing an unexpected effect: combat once again becomes extremely disorderly when communications fail or units become isolated. In many sectors of the Ukrainian front, soldiers survive entire days under drones and artillery hardly any contact of course with higher commands. The Pentagon appears to have drawn an uncomfortable conclusion from that experience: The more technological war becomes, the more important it becomes for a soldier to be able to keep fighting even when all that technology disappears. The fear of blackout. Plus: America’s new military obsession is not just about developing better drones or missiles, but about preparing troops capable of operating when the entire digital ecosystem collapsesif it does. The bayonet symbolizes precisely that idea. Not because the Army expects massive loads like those of 1916but because it represents the ultimate survival level military: keep moving forward when there is nothing else left. Ultimately, the decision reflects a very current paradox. The more sophisticated modern wars become, the more armies fear the moment when they will once again resemble something much more ancient, physical and primitive. Image | Joey Rhodes/US Army In Xataka | The United States has 54 billion euros for its army and a very precise place to invest it: in drones In Xataka | A soldier can and should disobey an illegal order. The problem that Anthropic faces is that an AI does not

that 20 euro flights are a relic of the past

During the great oil crisis In the 1970s, several US airlines began do something unusual to save fuel: deliberately reduce speed in mid-flight. Some They even eliminated olives of the salads served on board because every extra kilo mattered when kerosene prices skyrocketed. Half a century later, the airline industry is once again discovering the extent to which a distant energy conflict can transform something as everyday as getting on a plane. Goodbye to flying “cheap”. For more than two decades, Europe got used to it to something that would have seemed absurd in any other era: crossing the continent for less money than it costs to park your car at an airport. The low cost airlines They transformed the plane into an everyday means of transportation and normalized impromptu getaways, whirlwind weekends, and vacations designed around ridiculously cheap tickets. It so happens that the war around Iran is beginning to put into question precisely that model. He Closing of Hormuzthe brutal increase in the price of kerosene and the interruption of routes are hitting the economic heart of commercial aviation. And little by little an uncomfortable idea is beginning to emerge for the European consumer: those 20 euro flights that seemed eternal could have been a historical anomaly much more fragile than it seemed. Hormuz on the plane ticket. The Financial Times said this week that the connection between a conflict in the Middle East and a cheap flight between European cities seems distant until fuel starts to run out. Near the 40% of kerosene that Europe uses passes through the Strait of Hormuz, now converted into one of the main energy bottlenecks on the planet. The war has duplicated the global price of aviation fuel and forced to cancel tens of thousands of flights that simply became unprofitable. Some airlines have started even to carry out truly desperate logistical maneuvers to refuel in other countries or avoid certain routes. The problem is especially delicate because, even before the crisis, fuel was already the higher operating cost from any airline. When kerosene skyrockets, the entire financial architecture of the low-cost model begins to falter. Natural selection in war. Because commercial aviation has always been a brutally competitive industry with minimal margins, but the conflict with Iran is accelerating a consolidation process which had been occurring for years. There we have as a first reference the Spirit Airlines bankruptcywhich has been interpreted by many executives as the beginning of a new wave of mergers, disappearances and cuts. Weaker airlines, especially those focused on ultra-cheap fares, are beginning to face a scenario where maintaining extremely low prices can stop being viable. Even giants like Ryanair, easyJet or Wizz Air They watch with concern How rising fuel prices threaten the core appeal of your business. The problem is structural: no executive really wants to sell cheap tickets; wants to fill planes generating profits. And the less competition that survives the crisis, the easier it will be raise rates without fear of losing passengers. Flying expensive, again. For years, the expansion of low cost created the feeling that flying cheap was something natural and irreversible. But much of this phenomenon depended on a extremely delicate balance: relatively affordable fuel, enormous competition between companies, cheap secondary airports and a constant availability of efficient aircraft. The war is simultaneously eroding several of those pillars. Manufacturers such as Boeing or Airbus delays accumulate on deliveries, airlines are removing old models that consume too much and many routes are beginning to become economically unviable. Even historical giants such as Lufthansa or Air France-KLM already they are cutting thousands of flights to reduce costs. The worrying thing is that many of these measures could be maintained even after the conflict, consolidating a smaller, more concentrated industry with fewer incentives to maintain ultra-low rates. The new aerial geography. The crisis also threatens to redraw part of the world aviation map. For years, hubs like Dubai or Doha became authentic nerve centers that connected Europe and Asia thanks to abundant fuel, optimized routes and giants like Emirates or Qatar Airways. The war has hit precisely that network. Airspace closures, mass cancellations and supply problems have meant that many direct routes between Asia and Europe they fill even despite strong price increases. Some European companies are temporarily taking advantage of this situation, but everyone knows that when the Gulf airlines regain capacity they will start again a tariff war aggressive The difference is that this time they will do it in a context where fuel can remain expensive for a long time. The real problem: winter. Because summer still offers some room for maneuver as planes fly full and holidays sustain demand even with higher prices. But the industry’s real fear is what may happen next. If the conflict continues, energy prices remain high and airlines begin to exhaust their financial coverage on fuel, many winter routes they could disappear directly. That would open a dangerous spiral: fewer flights imply fixed costs that are more difficult to distribute, which forces prices to rise even further and further reduces demand. The risk is to end up entering a dynamic where low-cost travel stops being the dominant standard and once again becomes something much more limitedseasonal and expensive. In other words, the war in Iran is beginning to remind the West of something it had forgotten: behind every cheap 20-euro flight there was always abundant oil and geopolitical stability. And neither of those things seem guaranteed right now. Image | Pexels, Picryl, Picryl In Xataka | European airlines are taking advantage of the Iran crisis to accelerate something old: making your trip even more complicated. In Xataka | Iran is about to start another war: to buy a plane ticket before it costs a kidney

It is a cold war relic

In the month of March, the United States announced a strategic turn for Boeing’s military arm to Boomo and saucer: they gave him the device contract that must replace Washington in the highest drawer of military technologies. It was called F-47aspiring to replace the F-22 and overcome its scope. In other words: since then, if someone wanted to face the United States should have the new hunt among their thoughts. China does not have it so clear. What infuses them “fear” is more than 70 years old. Technological hierarchy. The result comes through an analysis prepared by researchers from the Early Alert Academy of the Air Force of the Popular Liberation Army (EPL) in Wuhan, where they have identified the strategic bomber B-52 Stratofortress (A relic of The cold war With more than 70 years of service) as the nuclear attack platform most threatening in the United Stateseven surpassing modern poachers like The F-35a and invisible bombers such as B-2 Spirit. The study, published in the magazine Modern Defense Technologywas based on simulations of a penetrating air operation against naval or land objectives in China, within the conceptual framework of an American air counterattack campaign (PCA). Against all forecast, the analysis concluded that the B-52H represents the greatest danger in the phases of deployment, penetration and attack. The key? Your ability to carry four nuclear bombs Tactics B61-12 already its constant modernizations in radar and electronic war. Obsolete only in appearance. There are more, of course, since the study highlights that B61-12 bombswith a power equivalent to 300 tons of TNT, they are designed mainly for deterrence, but could be used to neutralize critical nodes and access denial systems (A2/AD) In case of conflict. Despite its longevity, the B-52H stands out in front of more modern platforms for its load capacity, its operational scope and the robustness of its updated systems. Consequently, Chinese researchers conclude that, in a limited nuclear attack scenario, this veteran bomber would offer the greater “strategic value” For Washington. Moreover. The report even refers to a motion from the US Congress to restore the nuclear capacity of about 30 units of the B-52H, which reinforces its tactical relevance in the current context. B61 bombs on a portabombas Deterrence from the air. The EPL team was not limited to identifying threats: proposed concrete response measures, such as strengthening surveillance, interception and air defense capabilities along strategic routes. In addition, he stressed the need for INtensify military intelligence To discern if air attacks are conventional or nuclear, given the dual nature of many American platforms. In front of poachers such as the F-35A or bombers such as B-2, the researchers recommended the intensive use of Electronic War and Cyber ​​attacks as tools to disturb your navigation and communications. A list of priority objectives was also established based on their relative threat, being the plane of Early alert E-3 Sentry considered key in conventional scenarios, while airplanes as the C-17 or the B-1b Strategic Bombarder They were classified as minor threats for their limited roles and outdated systems. Tactical precision. Finally, the work tells that he avoided predictive models Based on artificial intelligence. He did, as they explain, for the concerns about their opacity (“Black Box”), opting for methods based on games and human judgment assisted by objective data. The assessment of threats was developed from sensitive technical information on US and Chinese systems, although at this point the sources were not specified. For example, it is mentioned that furtive aircraft such as B-2 and F-22 have transverse radar sections of only 0.1 m², this means that, a priori, it would allow its detection by Chinese radars at 400 km. This technical precision is framed in the context of the rapid development Chinese of Hypersonic missiles Antiacereos, which could intercept white to more than 1,000 km away, and reflects a regional denial strategy that Beijing has expanded in sensitive areas Like Taiwan and the sea of South China. Nuclear and Taiwan. In fact, the report does not seem that it has been commissioned just becauseof course. In a recent essay, former Undersecretary of Defense of the United States, James Anderson, already He warned That any future crisis in Taiwan would probably imply nuclear threats (implicit or explicit) by China, despite its official “not first use.” Under that prism, and in this framework of growing tension and bilateral technological sophistication, the recognition of B-52 such as the more serious nuclear threat Not only redefines strategic perceptions about the military balance between great powers, but also underlines how, in the era of drones (Ukraine) and the Cybernetic wara colossus From the twentieth century it can continue, even today, the biggest carrier of the Apocalypse. Image | US Air Force, United States Department of Defense In Xataka | If the Russian nuclear doctrine needed a signal, Ukraine has just tightened the button: it’s called Storm Shadow and comes from the United Kingdom In Xataka | In the middle of the Cold War, France designed a nuclear rearme plan for Europe. Now sound strongly

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.