bigger

the new Siri at the forefront of a bigger update than it seems

by

iOS 27 has a clear protagonist: Siri. After years of falling behind what many expected from an assistant built into the iPhone, Apple has shown in the WWDC26 a much more ambitious version, designed to better understand what we do, help us within the apps and respond with more context. Artificial intelligence takes a good part of the focus, but this update also touches many pieces of everyday life: from the camera and photos to Liquid Glass and performance. Siri: Apple’s great pending promise Assistant is by far the most ambitious change to the iPhone operating system. Those from Cupertino have not limited themselves to giving longer answers or a more natural voice: they have updated Siri with Apple Intelligence at the center so that it better understands personal context, takes into account what appears on the screen, recognizes images and can act within applications. It also gains access to updated knowledge of the web and becomes more conversational, with richer responses and the possibility of maintaining a back-and-forth with the user. The idea is that Siri stops serving only to set an alarm or send a message and starts solving more complex tasks simply by asking it. Apple has shown simple but very illustrative examples: “when is the Suki Waterhouse concert in San Francisco?”, “how can I buy tickets?”, or more personal requests supported by information distributed by the device. It will also be able to help with writing and editing practically anywhere we can enter text. Everything seems to indicate that Siri wants to stop being a function that we use to get by and become a layer of help that is much more present on the iPhone. Liquid Glass: Apple adjusts its big redesign after listening to feedback Liquid Glass It also receives adjustments in iOS 27. Apple introduced this visual language last year as its most ambitious cross-platform design update, but now it recognizes something quite natural in a change of this size: after the first leap come the refinements. The company has explained that it has listened to comments from users and developers. This translates to a new slider in Settings to adapt its look, from a lighter, sharper version to a more tinted one. Added to this is a more uniform top toolbar in applications, designed to keep labels, text and headers more readable. Search: Spotlight, Photos and Mail better find what’s already there Apple has also rebuilt one of those parts of the system that we only miss when it fails: search. We’ve all had that moment of looking for something we know is on the iPhone and for some reason it doesn’t appear. With iOS 27, the company has redesigned the base that powers Spotlight, Photos and Mail, with a more stable, efficient and complete index to better understand what content we have and where to find it. After updating, the system will re-index the device to have a more accurate image of what was already there. In Mail there is also a new ranking system so that the email we are looking for has more options to appear at the top. Child safety: more controls for families and adolescents The apple firm has also dedicated a part of iOS 27 to child safety. Apple expands the tools so that parents can better decide who their children communicate with, manage access to apps and adapt device use to different times of the day. Communication Safety will continue to warn and blur images or videos that may contain nudity, and also adds new protections against shared violent content. In Time of Use, there are recommendations for daily limits by categories such as entertainment, games and social networks, as well as times to choose which apps are available during school, on the weekend or during leisure time. In development. Images | Apple In Xataka | AI has meant that so many apps have never been launched in such a short time. The problem is that almost no one is using them.

While everyone was looking at Hormuz, Russia has found a much bigger secret route. And drones do not stop arriving in Iran

by

During the Cold War, Western intelligence services came to suspect that some Soviet freighters that apparently transported grain or machinery were actually hiding military equipment and technology sensitive under false covers. The problem was that, once inside certain internal routes controlled by Moscow and its allies, tracking them became extraordinarily difficult even for the greatest naval powers on the planet. While the world watches Hormuz. For months, the Strait of Hormuz has become the perfect symbol of Western pressure on Iran: US aircraft carriers, oil tankers diverting routes, marine insurance fired and constant threats on one of the great energy bottlenecks on the planet. However, while all international attention was focused there, Russia and Iran have been consolidating a much less visible and probably much more uncomfortable route for Washington: the Caspian Sea. It The New York Times said the weekend. This enormous space of inland water in northern Iran, usually ignored in geopolitical analyses, is being transformed into a true strategic highway to move goods, drones, military components and technology away from the direct reach of the United States. The photo. The most revealing image came when Israel bombed the Iranian port of Bandar Anzali, in the heart of the Caspian, in one of the most significant attacks of its campaign against Iran. The target was not in the Persian Gulf or Hormuz, but hundreds of kilometers further north. It was a clear sign that real logistical warfare no longer revolves solely around the most famous strait on the planet. The route that keeps Iran alive. The importance of the Caspian for Tehran has grown spectacularly since the pressure on Hormuz intensified. Russian and Iranian ships now transport wheat, corn, sunflower oil, animal feed and all kinds of of essential supplies who previously arrived via more vulnerable routes. Four Iranian Caspian ports are working at full capacity to absorb this growing traffic, while Moscow has begun to redirect millions of tons of goods that previously crossed the Black Sea. It turns out that the true strategic core is not in the cereal. According to US officials, Russia is using that route to send drone components to Iran to help it rebuild part of the arsenal lost during the last fighting with Israel and the United States. The relationship is especially symbolic because for years It was Iran that supplied Russia with Shahed drones for the war in Ukraine. Now the flow has partially reversed: Moscow manufactures its own versions under license and returns technology, components and military expertise to Tehran using the Caspian as a protected corridor. A perfect sea to avoid sanctions. The great advantage of the Caspian for Russia and Iran is that it is an extraordinarily difficult to control from outside. Unlike the Persian Gulf, where the US naval presence dominates much of the maritime traffic, in the Caspian they can only operate the five coastal countries. The United States cannot intercept ships there or impose direct blockades. Furthermore, a large part of the ships sail with transponders offdisappearing from satellite tracking systems and feeding an increasingly opaque network of “ghost ships.” In fact, Western analysts describe the Caspian as the ideal place for discreet military transfers and sanctions evasion. Dark shipping traffic has skyrocketed since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and both Moscow and Tehran have perfected methods to hide real shipments, routes and operators. It is no coincidence that Ukraine attacked the Russian port of Olya in 2024, accusing it of being a logistics center for the transfer of Iranian drone components. Nor that Israel Bandar Anzali will hit. Everyone seems to have understood that a logistical rearguard is being built there that is much more resistant than it appears. Moscow’s strategic obsession. Plus: for the Kremlin, the Caspian is not just a temporary solution derived from sanctions or the war in Ukraine. Russia and Iran have two decades imagining a gigantic trade corridor that connects the Baltic with the Indian Ocean, crossing Russia, the Caspian and Iran to avoid routes controlled by the West. The project includes new portsrailway lines and renewal of aging fleets, although many of these plans remain on paper due to lack of resources and the geographical difficulties of the Caspian. Still, the war has accelerated the strategic logic behind that idea: creating an alternative system of commercial and military circulation outside the reach of Western sanctions. For Putin, furthermore, the balance is delicate. Needs to support Iran as a regional ally and military partner, but do so in an all-too-visible way could deteriorate even more so its relationship with Washington and with several Arab countries important for Russian energy trade. The Caspian offers precisely that: sufficient support, but far from the media and military focus that Hormuz dominates. America’s great blind spot. Much of the Western concern arises from a very uncomfortable feeling: for years, the Caspian hardly occupied any space in American strategic planning. Experts in Washington recognize that the region functions almost like a black hole diplomat divided between different military commands and bureaucratic departments. Thus, while the world observed aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf or drones over Ukraine, Russia and Iran took advantage of an immense, opaque and difficult to monitor geographic space to weave a logistics network that connects both conflicts. The problem for the United States is not that the Caspian completely replaces Hormuz, because it cannot do so, especially in massive oil exports. The real problem is that even under extreme military pressure, sanctions and naval blockades, Iran continues to find ways to stay connectedrearm and receive outside support. And each drone, each component and each shipment that silently crosses the Caspian reinforces an increasingly evident idea: while everyone was looking at the Strait of Hormuz, Russia and Iran they were building an alternative route much more difficult to stop. Image | PexelsNASA In Xataka | We sensed that Iran’s attacks on the US had been important. In reality, they were devastating In Xataka | While the whole world looks at … Read more

China has closed a huge chunk of sky for 40 days. And all we know is that space is bigger than Taiwan

by

In aviation, advisories restricting the use of airspace usually last just a few days and are linked to very specific operations, while areas without altitude limits are reserved on rare occasions due to its impact on air traffic. In strategic regions of the planet, any prolonged alteration in these patterns is often interpreted as more than a simple technical measure. It just happened in China. An unprecedented air closure. China has closed for 40 days (from March 27 to May 6) a huge maritime airspace without offering any clear explanation, delimiting areas through aeronautical warnings which are normally used for short exercises but in this case they are unusually prolonged. To give us an idea, the extension of that space exceeds the size of Taiwan, which makes the measure difficult to fit within operational normality. The official silence and the scale of the movement suggest a deliberate decision that goes beyond simple air traffic management. What these notices really mean. The NOTAM (Notice to Air Missions) are designed to warn of risks or temporary restrictions, but their usual use is far from the current scenario, since they usually last a few days and are linked to specific, clearly identified maneuvers. Therefore, the combination of an extraordinary duration and the absence of explanations points more to a position of sustained activity more than a specific exercise. A priori, this implies that airspace control is being used as an active tool within a broader strategy. A key space on the regional board. counted the wall street journal A few hours ago, the affected areas extended from the Yellow Sea to the East China Sea, covering areas in front of South Korea and Japan and being located in strategic corridors for any military operation in the region. Although they are far from Taiwan (several hundred km), their location does not seem coincidental and fits with scenarios where the air route control would be decisive. The scale of the reserved area reinforces the idea that this is not a limited trial, but something with deeper operational implications. Signs in the midst of a tense context. The closure also coincides with a moment of high tension in the Indo-Pacific, with military movements in Japan, pressure about Taiwan and diplomatic activity relevant in parallel. Not only that. It also occurs after a striking pause on Chinese military flights near Taiwan, followed of its resumptionsuggesting a recalibration of activity. In this context, the measure can be interpreted as a way to send strategic messages without the need for explicit statements. Ambiguity as a strategy. In short, and although there are precedents for similar airspace reservations, they had never been so long nor so widewhich marks a clear difference compared to previous practices. If you like, this ambiguity also allows China to maintain operational flexibility, test scenarios and, ultimately, generate uncertainty among its rivals without publicly committing. The result is a signal that is difficult to interpret, one that, possibly or precisely because of this, multiply your impact strategic. Image | LG Images In Xataka | In silence, China is making giant strides in a race that until now it was not leading: space. In Xataka | The US opted for the quality of the F-35 rather than quantity. China opted for the opposite and it is already a problem

Russia’s ghost fleet has changed its business model. Oil has given way to a much bigger target: Europe

by

Since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russia has not only built a vast fleet of tankers to avoid Western sanctions and continue exporting crude oil from the Baltic and the Black Sea, but has turned that logistical infrastructure into something much more ambitious. How much? The size of an old continent. The fleet in the shadows. According to Western and Ukrainian intelligence sources cited by CNN, Part of this so-called shadow fleet is being used as a covert platform for espionage and hybrid operations in European waters. We are talking about hundreds of ships that routinely sail near the coasts of EU and NATO countries, generating income of hundreds of millions of dollars for Moscow while, at the same time, expanding the radius of action of its security services away from Russian territory. “Civilian” crews with a detail. The pattern detected by the intelligence services is revealing. Many of these tankers, registered under flags of convenience and with mostly Asian or African crews, incorporate just before setting sail to one or two Russian citizens additional. The crew lists show as simple “technicians”but his background tells another story: former police officers, members of special units of the Ministry of the Interior, veterans of the Russian army or former mercenaries linked to Wagner. They are often the only Russians on board and, according to testimonies of Danish maritime pilots and European observers, exercise an authority that goes beyond the civilian chain of command, even imposing itself over the ship’s captain. Moran Security and privatization. Many of these men would be linked to Moran Security Groupa private Russian company with deep ties to the FSB, GRU, and the Kremlin’s military contractor ecosystem. Moran was sanctioned by the United States Treasury in 2024 for providing armed security services to Russian state companies, and his history connects directly with Wagner and with operations in scenarios such as Syria or Somalia. Its corporate structure (with registrations in Moscow and in opaque jurisdictions such as Belize) and its professional profile, explicitly oriented to recruit veterans of special forces, fit perfectly into the logic of hybrid warfare: formally private actors that allow the Russian state to operate with a high degree of plausible deniability. Espionage and internal control. The functions of these “technicians” would not be limited to protecting the cargo. Ukrainian and Western sources maintain that also supervise captains non-Russian vessels to ensure that the ships are acting in the interests of the Kremlin and that, in at least one documented case, took photographs of European military installations from one of these tankers. Furthermore, although details are scarce, intelligence services suggest that some of these men have participated in acts of sabotage. These would not be direct confrontations, but rather low-profile actions designed to collect information, generate uncertainty and strain the limits of the Western response. The Boracay case. He Boracay tanker illustrates this dynamic well. Sanctioned, with frequent changes of name and flag, two Russian citizens embarked in September in the port of Primorsk, near Saint Petersburg. Both were listed as technicians and were the only Russians among a crew of Chinese, Burmese and Bangladeshis. Coincidence or not, his crossing through Danish waters overlapped with a wave of sightings of drones near the Copenhagen airport and Danish military bases. Days later, the ship was boarded by the French navy against Brittany for irregularities in their documentation. No drones were found on board, but the presence of the two Russians came to light and they were discreetly questioned. For some analyststemporal correlation proves nothing, but for others It fits too well with the pattern of trial and error in the “gray zone.” Drones, sensors and something new. Beyond Boracay, Swedish and Danish authorities have detected on other ships in the shadow fleet antennas and masts not usually found on civilian merchant ships, as well as hostile behavior towards inspectors and an obsession with photographing critical infrastructure. In an environment like the Baltic, a strategic bottleneck surrounded by NATO countries, any anomalous activity becomes a disproportionate weight. For European security services, these ships are ideal mobile platforms: seemingly legal, difficult to intercept without diplomatic escalation and capable of approaching ports, cables, bases and airports without raising immediate alarms. Hybrid warfare at sea. All this fits with a broader strategy that senior intelligence officials, such as the new head of British MI6describe as constant testing “below the threshold of war.” Drones near airports, aggressive activity at sea, discreet sabotage and covert espionage are part of the same repertoire. The shadow fleet is not only an economic instrument to circumvent sanctions, but an extension of the Russian security apparatus, capable of operating in a space where Western legal and military responses are slow and politically sensitive. The European dilemma. Europe thus faces an uncomfortable decision. Intercepting ships without insurance, with dubious documentation or with armed personnel on board could stop these practices, but it also carries the risk of a direct russian reaction. As summarized on CNN a veteran Danish maritime pilot, no small country wants to be the first to make the move. The answer, if it comes, will have to be collective. Meanwhile, the shadow fleet continues growing and sailingdemonstrating that for the Kremlin the war is not only being fought in Ukraine, but also in the seas surrounding Europe, silently and in civilian uniform. Image | kees torn, Greg Bishop In Xataka | For years Europe has wondered how to stop the Russian ghost fleet. Ukraine just showed you the way: with AI In Xataka | A ghost fleet has mapped the entire underwater structure of the EU. The question is what Moscow is going to do with that information.

Lava rises hundreds of meters in Hawaii. Under it, a much bigger plan: reactivate geothermal energy

by

The heat from the depths of the Earth is in the news again. And not only because of the almost unreal images of Kilauea launching jets of lava hundreds of meters high on the Big Island of Hawaii. Also because, while the volcano chains increasingly spectacular eruptive episodes, the United States is rediscovering the energy that those same volcanoes hide beneath the surface. Geothermal energy had been in the background for years. Suddenly, it matters again. Quite a spectacle. First of all, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) has warned that Kilauea is preparing for another high-energy eruptive episode. However, these are not isolated episodes. According to ABC Newsthe volcano has already had 36 and 37 eruptive episodes since December of last year. In some phases, the fountains have reached 300 meters and in others they reached 457 meters, a height comparable to a 100-story skyscraper. Even so, the entire phenomenon remains contained. All activity remains within the crater, away from homes or structures. That does not detract from the power of the figures: according to the USGSepisode 37 expelled 6.3 million cubic meters of lava in just nine hours, at a rate of around 190 m³ per second. But behind the show, another debate is beginning to make its way. Hawaii’s untold potential. In fact, as the Hawaii Tribune-Herald recallsSince 1993, the state has had a commercial geothermal plant, Puna Geothermal Venture, located precisely in the East Rift Zone of Kilauea. The University of Hawaii estimates that this facility produces five times more electricity than one of the state’s leading solar parks using 80% less land. The problem is that Hawaii has never tapped into that potential. The reasons combine real volcanic risksexploration costs and cultural resistance of communities for which drilling is a form of desecration of Pele, the volcano goddess. However, the context has changed. Kilauea’s continued activity brings back to the table a question that seemed shelved: should Hawaii use the heat that fuels its volcanoes to power its electrical grid? A door that begins to open. The University of Hawaii has been insisting on it for years. According to their analysis, all major islands could have usable geothermal resources, although knowledge outside Kilauea remains limited. Your Play Fairway project, funded by the Department of Energyhas already drawn the first deep heat maps beyond Puna. The pressure is now political. According to the Hawaiian mediathere are three state agencies competing for funding to re-explore the island in search of new deposits. 80 million public dollars are requested to map resources, drill test wells and reopen the way to a geothermal expansion that has been stalled for decades. The plan includes drilling outside of Puna, on the Big Island, but also in Maui and Oahu, where the resources would be deeper. As the volcano flares up and spills lava in nine-hour episodes, Hawaii looks under its feet: not at the magma, but at the heat that drives it. America’s geothermal renaissance. This local turn coincides with a national renaissance. According to a report by WoodMackenziegeothermal investment in North America soared 85% by 2025 in the first quarter alone, with $1.7 billion in public funds. The reason is not in the volcanoes, but in technology. The analysis points out three innovations that are transforming the sector: According to that analysisthe United States could have 500 gigawatts of geothermal capacity, a figure capable of reconfiguring the country’s energy matrix. However, there is still more. The hidden engine: data centers and AI. As TechCrunch detailedthis underground energy could cover two-thirds of the electrical consumption of the new data centers that will be built in the United States between now and 2030. And the technology giants are already taking positions. In fact, the cases are beginning to multiply as is Meta has signed an agreement with Californian startup XGS Energy to generate 150 MW of geothermal electricity by 2030 using a closed-loop system that prevents water leaks. Also Google has done the same partnering with Fervo Energy. Geothermal energy is no longer a marginal experiment: it is an energy outlet for the infrastructure that supports artificial intelligence. The question left by the volcano. As Kilauea continues its choreography—inflating, roaring, and shooting lava to heights not seen since the 1980s—Hawaii and the rest of the country look downward toward the primeval heat pulsing beneath the crust. Where nature shows its wildest power, technology sees promise: a forgotten energy resurfacing as the United States the more you need electricity continuous, abundant and clean. Image | Pexels and Rjglewis Xataka | Tenerife seeks to turn on its lights with the heat from the subsoil: this is its great commitment to geothermal energy

Now he’s going for something much bigger.

by

The war for satellite Internet is over, and Starlink has won by technical KO. Traditional operators that rely on geostationary satellites are not only unable to compete, they are seeing their customer base crumble. And what the company plans to unlock with Starship leaves no room for doubt: Elon Musk’s company is no longer looking at its former rivals. Its new focus is terrestrial broadband, including fiber optics. The old guard, erased from the map. The Ookla data They are devastating. With its megaconstellation of satellites 550 km above the Earth, Starlink’s connection is not only twice as fast as that of HughesNet or Viasat, but it offers an average latency of 45 ms, while its competitors in geostationary orbit move in the range of 680 ms. The market has responded accordingly. As Starlink surpassed six million customers worldwide, HughesNet lost 29% of its subscribers and Viasat plummeted almost 68%. They cannot compete with the verticality of SpaceX, which is the only company in the world that routinely lands and relaunches its rockets. Satellites like hotcakes. Thanks to its commitment to propulsive landing and the internal development of Starlink satellites, the Falcon 9 rocket has achieved an unprecedented launch rate in the history of the space industry. The company began deploying Starlink in 2019 and has just surpassed the barrier of 10,000 satellites launched. Although the first models have already re-entered the atmosphere, the active constellation is close to 8,700 satellites in orbit. To put it in perspective: Starlink satellites already represent 65% of all active satellites orbiting the Earth. There are more Starlink satellites than everything else combined. They’re not going to stay there. SpaceX not only has the technology to offer stable, global low-latency satellite Internet connectivity: it has the financial muscle to take it to another level. An analysis of TMF Associates compares Starlink’s revenue to the rest of the industry combined. To continue growing at this pace, Starlink needs to expand the market beyond traditional satellite users. Its objective is no longer just to connect rural areas: it is to convince the urban or suburban user that its service is a viable alternative to fiber or cable. The company has deployed a parallel Direct to Cell connection service to connect directly to LTE mobiles, and has made a historic move to acquire radio spectrumcornering competitors like AST SpaceMobile. Starship is the key. The current v2 mini satellites are “mini” because they are limited by the size of the Falcon 9 rocket. The real revolution will come with the V3 satellites, designed to be deployed by the gigantic Starship rocket. According to SpaceX itselfthese larger V3 satellites will be the ones that bring “gigabit connectivity” to users. Each Starship launch will add 60 terabits per second of download capacity to the network, which is “more than 20 times the capacity added with each V2 Mini launch on a Falcon 9,” SpaceX says. If Starship becomes a reality, there will be nothing to stand between Starlink and its goal of connecting everything. Image | SpaceX In Xataka | It is not normal to have more than 2,000 Starlink antennas on the roof. The suspicion: this is where Internet romance scams come from

We have a problem with pesticides in agriculture. And a bigger one with the panic they generate

by

Fear is a powerful weapon, and also a double -edged sword. Fear can lead us to caution or paralysis and dividing line is not necessarily wide. In the food sector this is especially true: Food is a pillar of our healthbut there are hardly any foods or additives that have not been at one time or another affected by some form of collective fear. A classic protagonist in this context is the pesticides. “People prefer not to know what the lettuce, tomato or strawberry by the BBC. Navarro de Castro is a sociologist and diploma in rural extension and development and in its latest novel, greenhouse planet, addresses The issue of the agricultural system That feeds us. Contemporary agriculture is difficult to understand without use of pesticidesnatural or artificial chemical compounds destined to poison arthropods and other animals that could threaten plantations. These compounds allow the integrity of our crops not to depend on periodic pests or that every year we lose a fraction of our production consumed by these animals. Pesticides raise two big problems. The first, about human health: if these compounds end up in our food chain, they can mean a risk to our health. The second risk is environmental: these compounds can end up extending beyond our orchards and greenhouses, causing damage to the environment. The possibility of consuming toxic substances in our foods scares. It is normal. But would you really be justified to eliminate entire categories of our diet for the fear of pesticides? Perhaps before reaching conclusions it is important to have a notion of the magnitude of the problem. A magnitude that can vary depending on our location: each country has its own legislation when regulating the use of pesticides, but also the ability to assert those laws It can depend on our geographical context. In Europe, the European Environmental Agency (EEA) published in 2023 A report in which analyzed the impact of pesticides in the environment and in our health. They observed, for example, “above the barrier of worrying” in 22% of the points monitored in rivers and lakes of the continent. They also referenced a study published in 2019 in which pesticide residues were found in 83% of agrarian soils in Europe. But the pesticide track is not only still in the environment, but also in our own bodies. In this case, the EEA refers to a study that monitored participants in five European countries between 2014 and 2021. In result: they found indications of the presence of at least Two types of pesticide in 84% of the sample. As the agency explains, the levels detected used to be older in children with respect to adults. The good news, in a certain sense at least, is that the sales of pesticides in the old continent were stable. Threat to health And what consequences can pesticides have on our health? It all depends on pesticide and dose so to talk about impacts. As noted The World Health Organization (WHO), pesticides are “potentially toxic for humans and can have both acute and chronic effects on health depending on the quantity and way in which a person is exposed.” The people most exposed to these agents are not necessarily consumers, but people with more risk are Those who manipulate themeither in their work as in their homes and orchards, adds the UN agency. The EEA indicates Some of the potential effects on our health. These include cancers such as non-hodgkin lymphoma, ovaries and prostate; neurological problems such as Parkinson and Alzheimer’s diseases; cardiovascular diseases; problems in the development of the little ones; reproductive problems both in men and women; and cognitive problems. Inter alia. The agency also points out that today it is impossible to estimate the degree to which these problems affect the European population. The issue of health impacts on health Still still investigated For experts from all over the world. The obvious question is, is there a solution? Washing the fruits and vegetables that we are going to consume is a simple act that Help reduce our exposure To this type of agents. But They do not solve the problem: This action does not eliminate all pesticides, does not avoid other forms of exposure and fails to reduce its presence in the environment. In Your interview with the BBCNavarro de Castro proposed a simple solution and within reach of consumers. “From the collective point of view, a thousand simple things could be done such as eating seasonal,” acquiring awareness of the origin of each product that we lead to our homes (and our stomachs). In Xataka | The big problem of agriculture in Spain is what nobody wants to address: every time it rains less and every time we want to plant more Image | Jürgen Althaus

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.