No drones, no snipers. Wild boar hunters in Barcelona have a simpler natural remedy: a homemade recipe

by

In 2022, a wild boar broke in on a terrace in Cadaqués and took several bags of food in front of dozens of tourists who recorded it with their cell phones while the animal walked between tables as if it had been living there for years. For many residents it was the definitive confirmation that wild boars were no longer occasionally entering the cities: they were beginning to behave like any other inhabitant. Barcelona and the impossible war. It we count a few days ago. Barcelona has been trying for years to contain the expansion of wild boars with health campaigns, population controls, forest surveillance and increasingly sophisticated protocols. However, the animals they keep moving forward street by street from Collserola to the urban heart of the city. The last episode has been especially symbolic: a specimen appeared calmly rummaging through garbage containers on Casanova Street, crossing the street for the first time. psychological frontier of the Gran Via and approaching the Raval. The image perfectly summarizes the underlying problem. While administrations and technicians deploy complex devices to control African swine fever and empty entire forest areas, wild boars continue to enter Barcelona attracted by something much more basic: easy food, accumulated garbage and urban waste converted into a permanent night buffet. The city as a new wild ecosystem. He Eixample case It reflects the extent to which the wild boar has stopped behaving like a strictly forest animal. Neighbors in the area had been reporting saturated containers for weeks, leftover food scattered on the street and a constant accumulation of dirt that attracted rats and other pests. The wild boar simply ended up occupying the last step of that urban food chain. The paradox is that, despite the thousands of copies captured and slaughtered around Collserola to contain swine feverthe city continues to offer exactly what these animals need to lose their fear of the human environment: easy access to food and the absence of predators. The result is a species increasingly accustomed to traffic, lights and densely populated neighborhoods, capable of crossing half of Barcelona during the early hours of the morning with absolute normality. The real secret remains the smell. The most striking thing is that, while Barcelona deploys health protocols, forest controls and institutional campaigns, many hunters have been using methods for years. much more rudimentary to attract wild boars. He viral success of homemade recipes based on anise, fermented corn, sugary soft drinks or sweet mixtures demonstrates the extent to which the animal’s behavior continues to be guided by extremely simple impulses. The strong smell of anise sprayed on cereal or the acidic aroma of fermentation act like a magnet for wild boars, which quickly locate any easy caloric source. This logic also explains what is happening in Barcelona: in the end, technology matters less than the ability to control access to organic waste. the city can deploy surveillance, sanitary sacrifices and mobility restrictions, but as long as there are points where garbage overflows and waste accumulates, it will continue to offer exactly the same stimulus as those improvised feedlots used in the mountains. Fauna altering a big city. I counted the weekend The World that the expansion of the problem is already beginning to have consequences that go far beyond neighborhood coexistence. The outbreak of African swine fever detected in Catalan wild boars has forced sanitary restrictions to be activated that have even ended up affecting the filming of large international productions. the movie The Last Druidstarring Russell Crowe, had to paralyze part of its production in Sant Cugat due to the limitations imposed in forest areas near the health outbreak. The episode illustrates the extent to which wild boar overpopulation has ceased to be a strictly environmental or agricultural problem and has become in a phenomenon with economic, urban and logistical impact. What began as the occasional presence of animals in the limits of Collserola is even beginning to interfere with industrial and cultural activities linked to the territory. Increasingly difficult coexistence. The big problem for Barcelona is that everything indicates that this situation It’s not temporary. Wild boars adapt extremely quickly to urban environments because they find constant food, less hunting pressure and relatively safe refuges in parks, open fields and peripheral green areas. At the same time, cities generate enormous amounts of accessible waste every night. The combination is explosive: animals increasingly trusting entering neighborhoods densely populated while administrations try to balance health control, animal welfare and citizen security. And there appears the great irony of the entire story. After massive campaigns, forestry devices and complex protocols, the battle against wild boars continues to revolve around something very ancient and elemental: the smell of food. Image | x In Xataka | The technological war that we see in Ukraine has an unexpected replica in Barcelona: this time the enemy is thousands of wild boars In Xataka | Lead has its days numbered in hunting. The problem is that no one really knows how to replace it.

China is about to launch the most powerful cargo drone in the world. And it will move it with hydrogen

by

The aeronautical industry has been researching and experimenting for quite some time. with hydrogen turboprop engines on airplanes. A Chinese company is about to break that barrier, as it has taken off an airplane with one of these megawatt-scale engines. Aero Engine Corporation of China (AECC) has completed the first test flight of the AEP100, installed on a 7.5-ton cargo drone, in an operation that took off from Zhuzhou airport, in Hunan province. what has happened. The device flew for 16 minutes, reached an altitude of 300 meters and traveled 36 kilometers at a speed of 220 km/h before landing without incident. According to AECC, the engine operated stably throughout the flight profile and responded as expected. Chinese state media present it as the world’s first flight with a hydrogen turboprop of this power. Why is it relevant?. Yes, it is a short, unmanned, low-altitude test. But this means that hydrogen aeronautical propulsion leaves the laboratory and test benches to face real flight conditions. AECC maintains that the country already has a complete technological chain for hydrogen aeronautical engines, from essential components to system integration. direct combustion. The AEP100 does not use fuel cells to power an electric motor. It burns liquid hydrogen directly in a turbine cycle, just as a conventional turboprop would burn kerosene. This is the main difference with other bets. Airbus, for example, has prioritized fuel cells on its roadmap to a hydrogen commercial aircraft in 2035, while China has opted for direct combustion. Combustion is more complicated to tame in engineering, but offers much higher power density, something key to scaling up to larger aircraft. What aircraft is it intended for?. The AEP100 is custom designed for the W5000, a twin-engine cargo drone developed by Chinese startup Air White Whale. According to the manufacturer’s data, we are talking about a device with a maximum takeoff weight of 10.8 tons, 5 tons of payload, more than 65 cubic meters of hold and a range of 2,600 kilometers. Just like share from China Daily, when it completes its first flight, it will become the most powerful transport drone in the world, surpassing the Norinco Luca. Deadlines. Yuan An, general manager of subsidiary AE General Aviation Power Tech, has explained The engine is in the final phase of the type certification process and they hope to obtain approval from the Civil Aviation Administration of China in 2027. The process is progressing faster than usual because the AEP100 shares a core with the AES100 turboshaft, which shortens procedures. Yuan has also assured that the AEP100 and its variants will “end the heavy dependence on foreign engines” in Chinese general aviation. Where will it be used first?. For now, we have to forget about getting on a hydrogen-powered passenger plane. The bet goes through what they call the “low altitude economy”that is, situations in which unmanned cargo drones, inter-island logistics or controlled transport routes to remote areas are used, being scenarios where hydrogen refueling infrastructure, certification and operational economics are more manageable than in passenger aviation. Yuan remember also that the United States has more than 275,000 general aviation aircraft, while in China there are only a few thousand. The problems that remain unresolved. Burning hydrogen in a turbine is no small feat, as you can imagine. It burns at higher temperatures than kerosene and with a much higher flame speed, which requires the design of systems that avoid autoignition, flame flashbacks and combustion oscillations. Added to this is storage, since liquid hydrogen requires cryogenic temperatures close to -253 ° C, heavily insulated tanks and, most likely, redesigning the geometry of the fuselage itself to accommodate it. Sustainability. aviation Today it is around 2% of global CO₂ emissions, a figure that could skyrocket in the coming decades if the sector maintains its dependence on fossil fuels. China aims to reduce its exposure to imported oil in an increasingly complicated geopolitical scenario, so hydrogen can fit into both narratives. And now what. China’s road map mark 2028 as horizon to validate similar technologies in small unmanned aircraft, helicopters and urban air mobility, 2035 for applications in broader regions and 2050 for large commercial turbofan aircraft. The first flight of the W5000 with the AEP100 installed is expected in the coming months and will be the next litmus test. Cover image | CCTV In Xataka | For China, DeepSeek is more than just AI: it is the key to creating an industry that makes them independent of Nvidia

If you are very good at your job and your boss sends you more tasks than the rest, share this article

by

Being the most committed employee in the office has a serious health risk: the more someone enjoys their job, the more trouble they end up making. things that don’t belongwhich are not going to add to your career and which, over time, can end up burning him. At least that’s what he claims an investigation from Cornell University and Northeastern University in which 4,300 employees from different sectors have participated. As and as he declared Sangah Bae, one of its main researchers, Northeastern Global News, This study was born from his own experience as a junior analyst in Chicago: the more involved he became, the more extra work fell on him. Years later, data confirm that this pattern was no coincidence. It’s not a coincidence: it’s a pattern. The researchers found that managers tend to assign additional tasks to employees who perceive as more motivated. In a field survey with 834 middle managers, 55% chose the employee they considered most motivated to assign extra tasks, even when the managers had data on variables such as age, experience or work performance, the perception of the employee’s motivation prevailed in their choice. The laboratory experiment was even more revealing since the researchers designed groups of three people in which one played the role of manager and the other two as employees, competing for a financial bonus linked to their performance. In this scenario, 74% of those acting as managers assigned the extra task to the most motivated employee, even though they knew that this hurt their chances of collecting that bonus. As a result, only about 31.37% of the most motivated employees ended up receiving an extra bonus for their performance improvement. Motivational oversimplification. According to the study According to Bae and Woolley, behind this tendency is a specific psychological mechanism that researchers have called “motivational oversimplification.” The manager’s reasoning is based on the fact that, if this employee enjoys his main job, he will probably also enjoy any extra task equally, even if it has nothing to do with what he usually does and is monotonous and routine tasks that they do not contribute anything. The researchers say that managers “can assume that employees who enjoy their main job will also enjoy additional tasks and that this enjoyment will protect them from burnout.” That is, if it is assumed that the employee will enjoy the task, it is assumed that it will not cost him that much to do it. The study data quantifies this perception gap: managers estimated a drop of just 0.2 points in the motivated employee’s job satisfaction when assigned extra work, while affected employees reported a drop of a full point on that same scale. When motivation turns against you. In one of the study tests carried out over a period of six days, managers chose the most motivated employee 69% of the time, which is equivalent to an average of 4.2 out of every 6 extra tasks assigned. This assignment pattern was repeated every day, which suggests that managers generate systematic inequality in the workload within their teams without being aware of it. “When managers have to assign extra work to their employees, they opt for the easiest option: a person they can trust. That employee who is your shortcut, that person you turn to regularly, who seems to be engaged and enjoy their work, could actually be silently suffering burnout,” Bae said. …and the motivation runs out. As revealed the study OSH Pulse 2025 of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA), 44% of EU workers are regularly exposed to task overload. In Spain, this percentage reaches 49%, and one in three European workers (29%) acknowledges having suffered stress, depression or anxiety caused or aggravated directly by their work in the last twelve months. In Spain, the number of employees affected by task overload rises to 40%. As and how they stand out in Harvard Business Reviewthe study by Cornell and Northeastern Universities adds a new variable that these occupational health data do not include: this burden is not distributed randomly among all employees of a company, but rather tends to concentrate precisely on the employees who are most involved.

“Going to the gym for an hour” is not worth spending eight hours sitting. And there is a deep evolutionary reason for that.

by

They have slipped it on us and it is time to recognize it. For years, the gym boom has been received with enthusiasm: having ubiquitous and accessible sports facilities to get us out of our sedentary routine can only be understood as something positive. And yet, the way sport has entered our lives is deeply problematic: we have managed to create a “compartmentalized model” of physical activity that is leaking everywhere. So “going to the gym” doesn’t work? No, it’s not that. It’s not what the evidence says. Intense exercise is helpful. Very useful. And it is always better than doing nothing: but the idea of ​​going to the gym for an hour and that’s it forgets that the relevant unit is not the hour at the gym, but the energy pattern of the 24 hours a day. Let’s put it another way: Why do the Hadza They do not burn more calories than office workers despite walking 12 km a daywhy weight loss gym programs consistently disappoint or why the WHO has begun to separate “exercise” from “sit less”? The answer to these three questions is the same: the evolutionary biology of the human being. Two lines of research that converge at the same point. Between 2012 and 2018, a team from Duke University coordinated by Pontzer discovered that the body It is not dedicated to linearly adding exercise expenditure to basal expenditure. What it does is compensate for it (reducing expenditure on other vital functions such as inflammatory, reproductive processes or metabolic control). That is, doing an hour (or more) of intense exercise does not have to increase total energy expenditure. The second line of research arises from comparing people with the same weight and height. In ’99, the Mayo Clinic discovered that the daily difference in energy expenditure can be attributed to things like walking, standing, housework, and other types of small unconscious movements. To this we must add that a sedentary lifestyle is, in itself, a risk factor. In 2016, Ekelund and his team discovered that between 60 and 75 minutes a day of moderate physical activity are needed to eliminate the excess mortality risk associated with sitting for 8 hours or more a day. That is, one hour of exercise does not solve the problem. And the problem is that the public conversation doesn’t realize it. It is unbalanced: the dominant imagination since the 80s sees doing “a handful of hours of exercise” as a way to “buy” health. The very long debate about how many steps to take each day is exactly the same. The issue, as I say, is that the evidence is clear that we are not buying anything. And then? Should we close the gyms? Nothing of the sort. The important thing at this point in 2026 is to begin to understand that the correct unit to think about our physical activity is the full day. As the WHO says“more activity is better than little; any activity is better than none; (however) reducing a sedentary lifestyle provides independent benefits” and is worth addressing regardless of the exercise we do. The idea of ​​”training for an hour and then spending the rest of the day calmly” does not hold water. Going to the gym is positive, but it is not a papal bull: intense exercise works as something that adds to leaving a sedentary lifestyle. It does not replace it. Image | Anupam Mahapatra In Xataka | Cereals yes, but wrapped in black cardboard: the packaging business aimed exclusively at men

We Spaniards are changing fishmongers for fish on a platter. And it is costing us very expensive

by

When your grandparents wanted to buy fish, they might have found more or less variety, but they had it easy: they went to the market or the fishmonger, asked questions, chose, paid and returned home with the purchase. Today things are somewhat more complicated. Or not. with consumption in low hours and food spending increasingly concentrated In supermarkets (to the detriment of neighborhood stores), it is increasingly common that instead of buying salmon, sea bream or any other fish on a counter, we take it from a refrigerator, already scaled, filleted and served on trays. The question is… Does that make it more expensive for us? What has happened? that the OCU just responded to a question that you may have asked yourself more than once if you usually consume packaged fish from the supermarket: Are you paying a premium? Would that filleted fish be cheaper if you bought it in the fishmonger’s section instead of on a tray? It is an interesting question if we take into account that Mercadona, the chain with higher market share of the country and agglutinator of more than 30% of the food distribution business in some parts of Spain, has decided retire their fish counters and bet on the sale of this product already prepared, packaged and arranged on trays. What has the OCU found out? In general terms, it is (indeed) likely that you are spending more money by taking home already packaged merchandise instead of buying it at the supermarket fishmonger. After carrying out a study in a dozen chains throughout April, the OCU concluded that “fresh fish sold packaged is up to 30% more expensive than that purchased at the fishmonger if they are small varieties, already cleaned and filleted.” That last nuance is important because the organization’s technicians verified that the percentage goes up or down depending on the type of product we are talking about. In some cases the extra cost of packaged fish compared to that sold over the counter shoots up to 45%. In others it narrows so much that it is almost imperceptible. “The answer is not as simple as it seems: in some cases, especially for smaller or portioned fish, we do pay a lot more to buy clean fish on a tray, but in others, for larger ones, there is almost no difference,” details the OCU. Can it go further? Yes. To begin, it is useful to know how your study was carried out. As recognizes the OCU itselfthe analysis is not as simple as writing down the cost (euros per kilo) of each product and then comparing. There are chains that only sell certain varieties of fish through a single channel (counter or trays). As if that didn’t complicate things enough, there is another key handicap: trays of filleted and packaged fish usually offer 100% edible product; That is, without bones, heads or any other disposable part, something that can happen with whole pieces from the fish market. And how did they calculate it? How can we compare the prices of trays of already cleaned fish with those we see in fishmongers, which usually show the cost €/kg of whole pieces? To solve it, the OCU was based on estimates from the Spanish Nutrition Foundation that they conclude that the edible part of the fish usually represents more or less between 55 and 67%, depending on whether we are talking, for example, about sea bream or sea bass. As for the chains, the OCU set in Ahorramás, Alcampo, Aldi, BM, Carrefour, Dia, Hipercor, La Despensa, Lidl and Mercadona. If we talk about gender, the analysis focused on four species frequently consumed in homes: sea bream, sea bass, hake and salmon. For referencethroughout the year between October 2024 and November 2025, we Spaniards consume 0.56 kg of sea bream, 0.55 of sea bass, 1.44 of salmon and 1.54 of hake. Do those details matter? Yes. Because thanks to them we can better understand how the gap between the price of fish on the counter and on a tray widens or narrows depending on the product we are talking about. The clearest cases are represented sea ​​bream and sea bass. In the first case (gilthead) the OCU calculates that merchandise sold packaged is on average 27% more expensive. And at the counter we also pay for the amount of merchandise that is wasted after weighing the complete piece. In some supermarkets that percentage even shot up to 47%. The case of the sea bass is even more egregious. The surcharge detected in filleted products served on trays is 45%. Is it always like this? Things change considerably when we talk about hake and salome. If we want some slices or loins, there are no big differences depending on whether we ask the fishmonger at the counter or go to the supermarket refrigerator to buy them in trays. A hake cut and prepared on the counter came out in April for €17-25/kgwhile on a tray it was charged at €18-25/kg. The salmon slices or loins also cost practically the same (€20-23/kg) both in the fishmonger and in boats. What is the conclusion? “The conclusion is clear: in small fish, the greater the handling, the more expensive the fish on a tray becomes compared to selling on the counter. In preparations with less handling, the premium is much lower, if not residual,” ditch the organization. In short: there is a premium, although it is not always nor is it equally forceful in all cases. It depends on the type of fish and also the level of preparation we want. “In small and filleted fish, convenience does pay.” Better one or the other? The OCU admits that the trays have “pros and cons” for both consumers and supermarkets. Among the first, the most obvious is speed and comfort. One of its biggest drawbacks is the loss of the figure of the fishmonger, crucial for advising the client, and the generation of waste. The organization also warns … Read more

Booktubers already confess that they read ChatGPT summaries. The question now is what is “reading” in 2025

by

The booktubers (social media content creators whose identity revolves around reading) are starting to shamelessly admit that they don’t read the books they recommend: they read what ChatGPT says and summarizes about them. The curious thing is that, unlike what more veteran readers would do, they do not confess it to their smartphone as something they believe they should be ashamed of, or apologizing to their followers for generating second-rate content. They count it as a productivity hack, a clever solution to the problem of having to produce content about books they don’t actually have time to read. 100 books in a week. The most striking case of this trend (that is still kicking) spiked in August 2025, when a TikTok user published a video in which He claimed to have read 100 books in a week.. The trick: the SoBrief app, which offers more than 73,500 audio and text summaries with the hook of “finish any book in 10 minutes.” The reaction on social networks was immediate: what is left of reading if what you are looking for It’s not exactly Lee’s experience.r? It was even commented that these booktubers had managed to make what Bradbury advocated in ‘Fahrenheit 451’ a reality (possibly the summary does not talk about it). It’s all invented. Although generative AI is now capable of summarizing the book we want in seconds, the Internet has been doing this function for years (in a more laborious way, of course). CliffsNotes, in fact, is pre-internet: has been on the market since 1958 publishing books that summarize other books, as an aid for students. SparkNotes, founded by four Harvard students in 1999democratized literary summaries on the internet and made them free. Blinkist, born in 2012, transferred that spirit to nonfiction essays. There is a whole geneological line which ranges from these meeting points for students who didn’t arrive in time to read the books (we had ‘The Lazy Corner’) to NotebookILM and ChatGPT, which devastates all of the above: ChatGPT is free and can summarize anything in minutes. The novelty coincides with the growing pressure on creators of literary content to give their opinion on everything that comes to market. The perfect storm. Second-hand identities. Beyond there being influencers more or less honest with their followers, the conversation and the underlying controversy affects the cultural identity of the books. In the column cited above, Marc Watkins talks about the importance of the bookshelf that was seen in Zoom video calls during the pandemic (which led to the trend of hiring services that sent you books with the “right” authors for the background of your meetings). We have reached the point where the idea of ​​being readers is valued more than the act of being one. There is thousand incarnations of this idea: books sorted by color on Instagram, hauls of visits to the bookstore that are never read, the videos of “books that changed my life” with recently purchased titles… being a reader is the center of these new identities, when reading itself should be. No humans have been harmed. We have a conceptual caper that rounds out all this chaos: a good part of the books that circulate in these communities were not written by any human either. According to a study from January 2026 that analyzed 844 books from the “Success” self-help subcategory on Amazon, published between August and November 2025, 77% were likely written entirely by AI models (although these assertions must also be pick them up with tweezers). The same report states that less than 4% of the authors in that sample published 12% of all titles. There are profiles that published five or more books in the period analyzed. One of the extreme cases is that of an author who published an entire series of motivational books in three days. Human participation in this entire assembly line is minimal: the content is synthetic, it is summarized by an AI, it is commented on by creators who have not read it, and the public participates in a conversation about books that no one in the chain really knows what they are about (and it doesn’t matter much either). It traffics in the shadow of books: signs that there are books somewhere, data about their existence, reactions to those data. In Xataka | There is only something as fascinating as the work of Albert Camus, his death: absurd, unforeseen and with the shadow of the KGB

If you feel guilty every time you leave your dog home alone, science has an explanation (and a couple of solutions)

by

Anyone who has a dog as a pet has probably faced a big problem when they grab their keys and coat and head out the door. This is nothing more than the whining and nervous pacing of an animal behind its owner that can end up barking or even destroying some object in the home due to the stress they feel when they are left alone and ‘abandoned’ under their conscience. However, science suggests that This separation anxiety is a bidirectional phenomenon. In two senses. As stated in different texts, leaving our pet alone not only triggers a peak of stress in the animal, but also generates a deep burden of guilt and anxiety in the human. And no, it is not that we are excessively humanizing our dogs, it is that our brains and theirs have developed an attachment bond that is comparable to that of interpersonal relationships. It’s not parenting. One idea we have in mind is that when a dog has anxiety when its owner leaves, for example, for work, it is the result of having had a very permissive childhood in which no animal restrictions were imposed. But today this has changed with important data. We can find these data in a large study published in 2020 on the canine population in Finland that revealed that between 14% and 20% Of dogs suffer from separation anxiety, they often have a strong fear of other stressors, such as loud noise. Why do they do it? Neither revenge nor general anger at having been left alone come into play here, but rather this behavior is linked to patterns of frustration and panic. Besides, there are some factors that predispose animals to have these problems, such as being male, coming from a shelter, having suffered early weaning or facing an environment that lacks predictability. In the human. Staying with only the reaction that the animal has, the truth is that it is a very short understatement. And here science has seen that owners also experience stress, difficulty concentrating at work or even cancel social plans to avoid the distress of leaving their pet alone. And here the bond that is generated between the human and the animal comes into play, being an attachment bond like that of a father with his newborn. And the people who develop an “anxious attachment” to their pets are precisely those who experience higher levels of anxiety when separating from them, as well as much more serious depressive and somatic symptoms when the animal dies or is not present. The solution. One of the important points in this case lies in teaching the dog’s brain that “exit signals” such as taking the keys or putting on the shoes, do not necessarily mean the end of the world, doing them without leaving the house. But also, we must keep in mind that when we return home we do not have to ‘throw a party’ to compensate for the guilt, since we only confirm to the dog that our absence was a terrible state of exception that has finally ended. This is why reunion should be normalized when we talk about a few hours of separation. Images | Wade Austin Ellis In Xataka | We have been using our pets to relieve our anxiety. And now the stress is on them

what changes from June 1

by

Let’s tell you all changes that have been announced in the payment system of the Madrid Metro network. These changes will bring new payment methods for the Metro that will be much more flexible and comfortable for users. These measures will begin with a first phase focused more on tourists than citizens, and this is what we are going to explain to you. It is a system that allows you pay at the turnstiles with your card or mobileso you no longer need to buy individual tickets. Direct payment by card and mobile Starting June 1 the Madrid Metro network is going to establish a payment system at the turnstiles themselves. In this way, users will be able to enter directly without having to purchase a Public Transport Card. You can make payments both with physical cards and from smart devices wherever you have them integrated, such as mobile phones, smart watches or other devices with contactless technology. Come on, you just have to bring your card or mobile phone with the wallet app to the turnstile, and it will charge you and let you pass. It’s something similar to what you can do on highways. The Metro network has already adapted a total of 1,249 turnstiles to be able to do this. In addition, all stations in the network will also have devices prepared to validate transport tickets using QR codes. During the first weeks, this payment method will have a promotional reduced price which will be 1.5 euros. Normally the price of the Metro can vary between 1.50 and 3 euros depending on your station of origin and destination, but to encourage its use the minimum price will be temporarily charged. In 2027 there will be smart payments What we have told you about card or mobile payments is only the first phase to modernize payments in the Metro. A smart payment system will also be implemented in 2027 called “Account-Based Ticketing”. This system will calculate the cheapest fare for each traveler based on the number of trips they make each day, and their origin and destination stations. Come on, it will mean that you don’t have to think about what rate you need to contract, and it will take into account your usage habits to give you the cheapest alternative. In Xataka Basics | Madrid transport pass in 2026: how much the discounts are extended, what are the prices and how to renew

Tom Hanks refuses to participate in the remake of this classic Hollywood film

by

In 2000, during the promotional tour for ‘Náufrago’, a journalist asked Tom Hanks If you would be willing to put yourself in the shoes of the protagonist of a remake of ‘The Invisible Harvey’, the 1950 fantasy comedy whose cast already led James Stewart and a rabbit that doesn’t exist. The response was blunt: “It’s like saying that we are going to make a new version of ‘It’s a Wonderful Life!’ For what? Leave her alone. ‘Harvey’ is perfect as it is, thank you.” Harvey: Origins. Before being a movie, ‘Invisible Harvey’ was a play. Its author, Mary Chase, took two years to write and premiered it on Broadway on November 1, 1944. It lasted 1,775 performances, until 1949, and in 1945 it won the Pulitzer Prize for Drama. In it, Elwood P. Dowd is an affable, bar-loving man who finds a good friend in Harvey, a six-foot white rabbit-like pooka (creature from Celtic mythology) that only he can see. His sister tries to put him in a clinic in a play that asks what exactly it means to be sane. The movie. When Universal bought the rights, James Stewart was the natural choice for the lead. The film hit theaters in December 1950 and performed reasonably well: around $2.6 million in revenue, but insufficient to cover the high rights costs for the work. Josephine Hull won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress and Stewart was nominated, but the memory of the film eventually faded in time, recovering decades later as a piece of unintentionally lysergic friendly fantasy cinema. Other remakes… by Tom Hanks. Hanks rejected the project in 2000, but it cannot be said that the actor is opposed on principle to updating stories from the past. Or at least it wouldn’t be in a short time: in 2004 he starred in ‘The Ladykillers’ by the Coen brothers, a remake of Alexander Mackendrick’s 1955 British crime comedy ‘The Quintet of Death’. In 2022 he made ‘The Worst Neighbor in the World’, directed by Marc Forster, a direct adaptation of the Swedish ‘A Man Called Ove’ (2015) by Hannes Holm. A remake that has a tail. ‘The Invisible Harvey’ has been on the verge of materializing on numerous occasions, without ever coming to fruition. Don Gregory acquired the rights in 1996 and ended up selling them to Miramax, which He didn’t do anything with them either.. In November 2003, John Travolta was in negotiations to star in a remake co-produced by Dimension Films and MGM, which also fell through. The most serious attempt came in 2009, when Steven Spielberg he was interested in directing the film under the umbrella of Fox and DreamWorks. Spielberg’s first choice for Elwood was his frequent collaborator Tom Hanks, but when Hanks turned down the role, Spielberg shelved the project. Later the names of Robert Downey Jr. and other actors such as Jim Carrey or Adam Sandler circulated, without any of those names reaching beyond speculation. In December 2018, Netflix announced that it had picked up the rights to the project, with the writers of ‘Shrek 2’ and ‘The Smurfs’ on board. But since that announcement no progress has been made. The versions that did exist. Although the film remake was never made, the film does have history on television. The first remake came in 1958, with Art Carney in the title role. It was well received at the time, but without leaving too much of a mark. In 1972 it was James Stewart himself who returned to the character, in a Hallmark Hall of Fame production for NBC. Stewart accepted this second opportunity because he was dissatisfied with his performance in the original film: the result was a darker version and more faithful to the play than to the film. In 1996 the most forgotten version arrived: an adaptation for CBS with Harry Anderson as Elwood, and with Leslie Nielsen in the cast, with added scenes and a change of tone that was not very convincing. That same project was the one that Don Gregory ended up selling to Miramax when the rights to the film remake continued to float around. Header | Dick Thomas Johnson In Xataka | Originality is dead in Hollywood: ‘Moana 2’ culminates a year where only sequels triumph at the box office

The Ferrari Luce is horrifying almost everyone. And that’s the smartest thing Ferrari has ever done.

by

When I write these lines, less than twelve hours have passed since Ferrari presented its first electric car. But what could be a polarizing release has become more or less unanimous if you scroll through social networks like X or Instagram comments. He Ferrari Luce is: ugly. There would be those who were in favor of a completely electric Ferrari but if we talk about its pure aesthetics, no one seems to make sense of it. It didn’t take long for them to arrive comparisons with a Nissan Leafjokes that They resemble the Luce with Apple’s Magic Mouse and its controversial loading port and, of course, a huge string of comments in which it is questioned that someone can buy “that” for more than 600,000 euros. And that’s the smartest thing Ferrari has ever done. No, I will not be the one to defend the aesthetics of the most anticipated electric car in years. I won’t be the one to say that I like it, because I would be betraying the truth. I will not be the one to defend, even, its interior. But I understand what they have done. Or I think I understand it, you will say. The largest accessory in the world Ferrari is passion. Ferrari is sportsmanship. Ferrari is the sound of the best V12. But Ferrari has also become something more. Ferrari, the most famous car manufacturer in the world, has long since transcended the market itself. The Il Cavallino brand is fashion and design. Although some don’t like (or we don’t like) that fashion or that design. With the current European emissions regulations and due to its own positioning in the collective ideology, Ferrari needed to release an electric car. It is not that the brand has problems passing on the million-dollar fines for excess emissions from its cars to its customers, but the Luce allows them to expand their profit margin per unit sold so that Europe does not narrow it. And we must not forget that the huge investment in R&D not only reverts to the Luce, the Ferrari F80, which is the brand’s most advanced car and one of those exclusive units that the firm launches every 10 years mounts the same electric motors for its hybrid train. Decisions that will be maintained over time. In short, if Ferrari wants continue putting a naturally aspirated V12 engine on the market Earning the enormous amount of money he earned with each unit sold, he had no choice but to launch an electric car. At this point, the company had two paths to take. The first was to create an electric Ferrari. Simply. An aesthetic similar to what we already know, but with an electrical system that takes the hiccups away. There would be no doubt that the launch would have been less polarizing, with its detractors assured but also its staunch defenders. The second possibility was to take an alternative route, to do something completely different. And that’s what they’ve done. Right now, the electric supercar market does not exist. The Porsche Taycan achieved enormous success in its first years, hiding its enormous weight with a behavior that our colleague Héctor Ares said he had never experienced. But over the years, sales have been deflating. Mate Rimac said that his supercar, the Rimac Refrigerator which was sold as the electric car faster and more advanced of the world, It is not sold because the customer feels that a political decision is being imposed on them. Lamborghini has canceled its plans to launch an electric car because it says it does not match its essence and, we imagine, potential sales have cooled down. Anyone looking for a supercar wants it for image. But also because he enjoys the sound of his engine, the sharp click of his gear change. It’s an image, of course, but the experience brings with it additional sensations that are impossible to match with an electric car at the moment, no matter how fast it is. Interior of the new Ferrari Luce The alternative has been find a new audience. The choice of Jony Ive to design the interior of the car gave clues that, for better or worse, the Ferrari Luce would be different. And you may like it more or less but the design exercise is intelligent and well thought out. The choice of the former Apple guru together with Marc Newson he anticipated strong emotions. And the result speaks for itself. According to the brand, this duo “was given the necessary creative freedom to define the design direction of the project from the beginning” and their collaboration with Ferrari Design Studio added “a fresh perspective and mutual enrichment, allowing the introduction of a new aesthetic language” If it makes complete sense, it is because Ferrari has lost the purist in this segment. Whether you like it more or less aesthetically, betting on the same line to create an electric supercar would condemn you to ostracism. Rejected by the hardest wing and diluted in the range for the client who was no longer considering a Ferrari from the start. The Ferrari Luce is the largest accessory in the world. It is not designed to check if that 0-100 km/h in 2.5 seconds is real. Or if it is true that it reaches 310 km/h top speed. Nor to face his almost 2,300 kg on a circuit. The Ferrari Luce was born as a luxury accessory for the elite. To enjoy the best restaurants in the center of cities like London, New York or Miami. The way of shouting that you are trendy, that no matter how much money you have you are committed to a certain lifestyle. Just like a Lamborghini Urus, it is designed to be walked on the street and not to face a circuit, no matter how surprising its performance on it was. That the car is the first five-seater Ferrari in history is a good example of the underlying philosophy. Enzo Ferrari … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.