Jeff Bezos says AI won’t destroy jobs. He then launched a company to create artificial engineers

Jeff Bezos is one of the representative figures of current technological optimism regarding artificial intelligence. While in the United States we are seeing the university students who boo to those who claim that AI is the new industrial revolution due to pessimism when it comes to finding a job, Bezos point that this pessimism around AI is “the opposite of reality.” Come on, young people are wrong because what AI is going to do is create jobs. At the same time, Bezos has returned to talk of Prometheusa startup that will open the door to fewer workers being needed… while increasing productivity. It’s a bit of a mess, but it makes sense to Bezos. Prometheus. It is not a model or a technology, but a startup. Founded by Bezos in 2024, it has about 150 employees spread across headquarters in San Francisco, London and Zurich and already has a valuation of $41 billion. The central purpose of Prometheus is to develop AI systems capable of assisting in the entire engineering process from start to finish (end to end, as they call it). This means that the system will cover from the initial design of physical products to their manufacturing and launch, passing through all the simulation and testing phases. It is like a kind of artificial general engineer and does not seek to be just something that supports the engineers, who will then create the physical products. His goal is… that, to be a physical engineer. Accelerate inventions. Beszos’ goal is to empower engineers to be able to invent things more quickly and easily. An example is that this AI product is capable of carrying out all the aforementioned steps to build, for example, a jet engine. And here is the twist, since a jet engine is something extremely complex, but what Bezos is looking for is that what the startup develops allows smaller teams to do much bigger things in much shorter cycle times. Landing it: if before 100 people made you a new generation jet engine, now 10 can make it for you. I don’t know, Rick.… We suppose that in his head it is a good way to reassure those young people worried about the future of work, but in case it is not clear, Bezos commented that the fear of AI and the future of work is “the opposite of reality”, pointing out that what Prometheus does will be a catalyst for work. The curious thing is that he has presented it in a slightly strange way. If AI makes work cheaper, faster and easier, employment will increase because, “even though the number of people needed is being reduced by 10, technology will create opportunities to multiply those jobs by 10.” They are a bit strange accounts, but the boss of Amazon gives as an example a two-person household in which only one will have to work because productivity thanks to AI will be much greater. It does not say what that other person will do or if, thanks to AI, that member of the household who continues to work will earn more to replace one who stays at home. What it suggests is that there will be such a massive increase in productivity that not everyone will have to work, a somewhat questionable message because bills are not paid with productivity, but with money. colossal background. But well, beyond Bezos’ curious message, Prometheus is valued at $41 billion and has raised $12 billion from investors such as JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and BlackRock, apart from Bezos himself. And, currently, it is in deals to raise a fund of 100,000 million. But Bezos isn’t the only one moving to build AI startups. We have the founders of Uber, Coinbase or Robinhood (curious name) building new companies around this technology boom due to something that these profiles are very clear about: It is a new golden era and the best way to start a company. Young Americans are not so clear. In Xataka | Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, on the possibility that we are facing a work apocalypse: “It’s nonsense”

I thought that in 2026 I could buy a cheap cell phone without worrying about anything. big mistake

I have spent half my life being especially critical when analyzing phones and, on the only occasion that I have decided to stop being so, I have hit a wall. We are in 2026, a year in which one might think that at this point in the game practically any phone newly launched on the market must work well. Mistake, big mistake. So I want to tell you how the component crisis in the technology sector and, to be honest, a certain apathy on the part of manufacturers, continues to make choosing an affordable mobile phone complex in 2026. Either we look closely at what we buy, or it may turn out to be a failure. The objectives. A mobile to send and receive WhatsAppsliterally. I wanted a phone whose main use was to manage communication with clients in one of my projects and, taking advantage of the fact that I had a new purchase, use it as GPS when I ride a motorcycle. The demands were minimal, there were practically no requirements other than that the cell phone worked decently. The expectation was not high either: I know that a low-end mobile phone does not work like a high-end one, not even like a mid-range one. I was just looking for something functional and simple. The search. I started the search, with phones over 100 euros. For that price it was practically impossible to access basic phones like the LITTLE M7which at least has a Snapdragon 685 (a processor, mind you, from 2023), so I had to continue lowering the bar. I ended up finding a 199 euro phone on sale for 89 euros on Aliexpress. One with 8 GB of RAM, 256 GB of internal memory… and a Helium G100 Ultra. the drama. The Helio G100 Ultra is an entry-level processor launched in 2024, relatively modern, and should have enough capacity to run basic applications. That’s what I thought. It’s been a while since I’ve tried an entry-level model. I thought that in 2026 things would be a little better, and I couldn’t be more wrong Almost two seconds to open the camera, lag in the launcher with the mobile newly configured, constant freezes and a performance that, after having tried other cheap mobile phones of a similar price (without offer), was simply unacceptable. And no, I’m not going to tell you the model so as not to draw blood, but it is one of the most popular mobile phones in Spain. Blind. One of the supposed advantages that it has brought us the semiconductor race is all about performance. For some time now, in certain ranges, my recommendations when asked which mobile phone to buy for The same does not happen with the entry ranges. Processors like Helium G99Helio G100, and even some Snapdragon 600 series (or Gen 6) are still barely moving basic apps. And the worrying thing is not how the phone performs right out of the box (which already performs poorly), it is how it will perform in a few years with some hardware degradation, system and app updates. big horse. At this point in the game there is something that is very clear to me, something that I have always defended: the processor It is much more important than we can think as average users. It is the heart of our mobile: The Gross Performance Manager The person in charge of the modem who will make us have better or worse coverage The element behind photo quality and camera performance The one that allows the final audio quality to be better or worse The one that helps to manage energy consumption more or less efficiently And here, even though the chip race continues at its pace, the high-end processors from a few years ago are noticeably superior to the entry-level ones. So between that high end of 2024 full of chicha and that newly released entry range… I’m clear about what I should have done. Image | Xataka In Xataka | Best mobile phones in quality price. Which one to buy based on use and nine recommended models

Few watches are designed by and for padel players. This is one of them, and I have tried it

What will we have to do as padel players so that smart watches do not allow us to monitor our matches. That same question I did it to myself back in 2021, five years ago, and the film is not very different from today. Although paddle tennis is an extremely popular sport, few, almost none, are the brands that remember those of us who enjoy this sport, and those that do remember have paddle modes that do not provide any useful information. Then MWC arrived and there I discovered Mibroa Chinese brand of smart watches that seeks to differentiate itself right there, in paddle tennis. They openly acknowledged that it is not that padel is gaining popularity in China, but that they want to use this sport to enter Europe. And of course, as someone who has been playing paddle tennis since I was little, I was curious, so I decided to try one of their watches on my own wrist. During these last weeks I have been using the Mibro GS Pro2 during my matches and padel classes, and this has been my experience. Forehand, backhand, layup, small to the foot Mibro GS Pro2 | Image: Xataka As a smartwatch, the Mibro GS 2 Pro ticks almost every box. It’s big, but comfortable; The screen looks good, the battery lasts two weeks with complete peace of mind and allows you to receive notifications, calls, etc. It has, however, three problems: The operating system, which is an RTOS, moves somewhat lazily and responds a little slowly to touches and gestures. You have a connectivity problem with your mobile phone that causes notifications to stop coming in at specific times. It lacks advanced functions such as ECG or mobile payments, something that cannot be criticized since it costs 140 euros. It has serious translation problems into Spanish, both in the app and on the watch. Positive part? The problem of performance, connectivity and the app could be fixed with a software updateit’s not something that worries me at all. Be that as it may, we have come here to talk about paddle tennis, so let’s get down to business. When we enter the court and activate the paddle mode, the first thing we have to do is put the watch on the same wrist as the hand with which we hold the paddle. I always wear the watch on my left wrist, but since I am right-handed, I hold the paddle with my right. This has no relevance in tennis, since the racket has no wrist ties, but in padel it is different. A paddle tennis racket has a wrist support that prevents it from flying away if our hand gets sweaty, if it slips due to a strong blow, etc. That support goes to the wrist, right where we have the watch. If it’s just a little rope, nothing happens, but if the grip is larger, as is my case, it can be a little uncomfortable. This, however, will depend on each person’s shovel. During the session, the watch measures in real time the type of stroke and the speed with which we execute it. You can actually see it live as you play. This is quite useful, especially when the hit defines the point. It helps you know if, perhaps, you have come forward with force in a defensive blow. This information, well managed, is useful, and you are going to allow me to go into coffee mode for coffee lovers. Mibro GS Pro2 | Image: Xataka Although paddle tennis seems like a sport where you hit the ball very hard, the truth is that it is not like that at all. As a general rule, a looser, well-defined stroke is more useful What a very strong blow. The weak and well-placed blow, hitting the wall or the mesh, creates more difficulty for the opponent. The strong hit, however, usually gives more opportunities. It all depends on the case, needless to say, but if you watch a professional padel game you will realize that they only hit the ball when they know very well that they are going to hit it for four (over the rear glass), for three (through the side glass) or that they are going to bring it back (the ball hits the opposite glass and returns to our court). And in fact, there is no need to spank him because, again, it is more a question of technique than strength. For the rest, they tend to use “weaker” and intentional blows. Mibro GS Pro2 | Image: Xataka And why am I telling you this? Because I, who go to weekly classes, have found it very useful review the speed applied to the blows to discover what I do well and what I do wrong. If I am volleying on the backhand and I want the ball to go to the cross net or deep to the double wall, a strong hit is of little use to me. Better a weak one. Reviewing the speed at which I hit the shot when it went well (or badly) helps me adjust future shots and memorize gestures. Coupled with the teacher’s feedback regarding posture, position and rhythm, it is valuable information. The watch detects the type of blow and its direction quite accurately. In the screenshots above you can see on the left a paddle tennis class focused on layups alternating turns of forehand and backhand; and on the right a game (which we lost, unfortunately) in which I played backhand, ergo the proportion of forehand shots is higher, the proportion of layups is too low and the proportion of lobs is too high. What does that mean? They took us out of the net very easily, they always kept us at the back and, therefore, we had little attacking capacity. The lack of context This information is useful, but if you know how to play you will know, with complete certainty, why you have won or … Read more

the two pharaonic African gas pipelines that want to change the energy map

The invasion of Ukraine in 2022 dynamited the foundations of European energy security. Before the conflict, Russia supplied between 40% and 45% of the European Union’s natural gas imports, injecting more than 155 billion cubic meters annually into the continent. Faced with the urgency of disconnecting from Moscow, Europe was looking for a place to fill its reserves again and the answer was in the south. To understand the magnitude of this shift, just look at what is happening on the ground. According to The Africa Reportunder the scorching sun of southern Algeria, the energy ministers of Algeria, Nigeria and Niger officially inaugurated the works of the gigantic Trans-Saharan Gas Pipeline (TSGP). It is not a project on paper; the pipes are already being welded. As detailed Al-Monitorthe Algerian state company Sonatrach has begun building a critical 1,210 kilometer stretch in the Aoulef region, which will connect Nigerian gas to the immense Hassi R’Mel field, a node that already has direct arteries to Europe. A question of survival. The European Union plans to end its dependence on Russian gas at the end of 2027. The arrival of a new corridor that provides 30 billion cubic meters of gas per year is a strategic lifeline. But for the African continent, the meaning is even deeper. It is about resolving a historical paradox: being a continent rich in energy but with serious deficiencies in local electricity access. According to an investigation published in the Journal of Geo-Energy and Environmentthe rival project, the Africa-Atlantic Gas Pipeline (AAGP), could generate about $75 million annually in transit revenue for West African countries. Furthermore, these projects are designed so that a part of the gas stays in the transit countries, promoting their electrification, their industrial development and reducing the use of polluting biomass. The battle of the megaprojects. However, this energy awakening has unleashed a fierce geopolitical rivalry. As highlighted The Africa ReportAlgeria and Morocco are competing aggressively to become the exclusive “gateway” for Nigerian gas to Europe, spearheading two colossal megaprojects competing for international funding and European favor. On the table are two titans of engineering that promise to change the world map: The Trans-Saharan Gas Pipeline (TSGP): Led by Nigeria, Niger and Algeria. Business Insider details that it will measure 4,128 kilometers in length. It will cross the desert and it is estimated that its cost ranges between 13,000 million dollars and the 19.5 billion. With the works already started in Algeria, the Minister of Petroleum of Niger has confirmed that his country will begin to build its section of 720 kilometers at the beginning of 2027. The Africa-Atlantic Gas Pipeline (AAGP / NMGP): The Moroccan alternative is even more pharaonic. With a length of between 5,600 and 7,000 kilometers, it will border the entire Atlantic coast, crossing 13 African countries. Its estimated cost amounts to about 25 billion dollars. How to finance infrastructure of this magnitude? academic research concludes thatAfter analyzing multiple strategies, the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model is the most robust and viable path. This model makes it possible to mobilize the gigantic private capital necessary, transfer the risks of construction and operation, and at the same time ensure that local governments maintain fiscal benefits and employment development. The small print. Despite the euphoria, the obstacles are formidable. As you remember Al-Monitorthe trans-Saharan gas pipeline was conceived in the 1970s and has suffered decades of paralysis. Academic analyzes warn that the viability of the project is threatened by historical security risks in the Niger Delta, northern Niger and southern Algeria, coupled with political instability caused by recent coups in the Sahel region. Furthermore, there is an “elephant in the room”: the energy transition. Natural gas is seen as a transition fuel. So that these gas pipelines do not become stranded (obsolete) assets in the long term in the face of European climate policies, experts point out that they must be designed with operational flexibility. This includes “reverse flow” capability to redistribute energy southwards when Europe doesn’t need it, and even adapt infrastructure to transport green hydrogen in a decarbonized future. A new axis of power. The center of gravity of world energy is falling southward. Europe, cornered by geopolitics, desperately needs the stability of new suppliers; Africa, for its part, demands the investment and infrastructure it has historically been denied. The success of these thousands of kilometers of steel tubes, buried under the burning sands of the Sahara or submerged off the Atlantic coast, will decide much more than the temperature of European homes in the coming winters. The true historical challenge is not to demonstrate that the continent can turn on the northern lights, but to dare to invent a model where Africa stops exporting its wealth to import dependence. The ultimate goal is for African energy to belong to and transform, once and for all, its own people. Image | Unsplash Xataka | The first natural gas that does not depend on fossil sources is already a reality in Europe: it is manufactured in Extremadura by combining hydrogen and CO2

is to eat three meals every day

The pattern we follow today of breakfast, lunch and dinner is so ingrained in our daily routine that we tend to assume it as a human physiological need. However, neither evolutionary biology nor clinical nutrition dictates a universal rule about how many times you should eat per day, since the idea that “three meals a day” is a norm dictated by nature clashes with reality, since History shows us how it has been a habit that has been shaped over the years. A history class. For centuries, in places like England and the United Statess, a large part of the population only ate two main meals a day, but the three-course scheme became established when salaried work, factories and school schedules made a regular distribution of the day more useful. And although we tend to think that we always ate this way, eating patterns are reordered with the new urban and work schedules driven by the Industrial Revolution. A turning point. The consolidation of breakfast, lunch and dinner went hand in hand with the industrialization and urbanization of society, although it did not occur identically or simultaneously in all countries. In fact, in the European fieldthe main meal used to be strongly linked to midday, so the evening “dinner”, understood as the big family meal, is much later than common sense suggests. Therefore, when it comes to being rigorous, it is not appropriate to affirm without nuances that the Industrial Revolution “invented” the three meals from one day to the next, because history shows us that the evolution was more gradual and strongly depended on the country and social class. a study published in the magazine Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism point that European dietary patterns changed due to these economic and social transformations. But what is clear is that the modern pattern was consolidated with industrialization, urbanization and the arrival of more rigid work schedules that structured people’s lives. What does physiology say? Beyond the historical evolution that we have had as a society, medical science indicates that there is no strong base to say that a fixed number of meals is a universal biological law. Delving deeper into the evidence we have, a review published in the journal Nutrients in 2022 determined that what we know about meal frequency is limited and heterogeneous, concluding that there is no universal rule valid for everyone. What we have seen with different trials is that reducing the frequency of meals, even without applying caloric restriction, can alter some metabolic markers, but this does not at all demonstrate a universal superiority of a specific number of times to eat. Likewise, the well-known population study EPIC-Norfolk found a link between how often we eat and serum cholesterol levels, a reminder that “eating more” does not automatically equate to “better health.” How we distribute the food. A meta-analysis published in JAMA indicates that the timing and distribution of meals can influence weight and metabolism, but that is not the same as defending a specific frequency as the norm for everyone. What nutritional chronobiology does warn us about is that the internal clock plays a crucial role and consuming food in the morning is associated with a better metabolic profile in some studies, while eating at night or irregularly is related to worse results. This is why maintaining irregular eating habits during adolescence can even be associated with poorer long-term cardiometabolic health in adulthood. Images | Louis Hansel In Xataka | Madrid is encountering a growing problem in its metro stations: the illegal sale of street food

We believed that a master’s degree was a guarantee of finding a job. It’s starting to be of exactly no use.

When you have higher education and can’t find a job or want to advance, historically a good idea has always been to go back to school. Getting a master’s degree was an almost safe investment in the face of uncertainty because it allowed you to specialize and find a better job. However, if we talk about master’s degrees, that reality is no longer true. More specifically, general master’s degrees. Because while doctorates or qualifying master’s degrees do work, general master’s degrees suffer an alarming devaluation in the market: according to a study by the Burning Glass Institute with data from the Bureau of Employment Statistics (BLS) of which echoesThe Wall Street Journalthe unemployment rate in the United States among those under 35 years of age with a master’s degree is at one of its highest levels in the last 20 years. Master’s degrees are worth less and less. What the Burning Glass analysis says is that those who have a master’s degree under 35 years of age are in the 77th percentile of unemployment when the normal is the 50th percentile. In fact, they are behind those with less education. Of course, we are talking about general master’s degrees, not qualifying ones. Furthermore, this phenomenon does not occur among those who have a doctorate. Gad Levanon, chief economist at the Burning Glass Institute, sums it up appealing to the law of supply and demand: “there are more titles competing for fewer positions than those titles were designed to unlock.” In short: once a master’s degree was a sign of distinction, but when everyone has it, it no longer makes a difference. Why is it important. Beyond statistical curiosity, it is a question of time, money and expectations. Making an effort to pay for a master’s degree thinking that it is an investment with a quick return and when it is not is frustrating. Plus, a 2025 Indeed survey collect that more than a third of graduates consider that their university degree was a waste of money or time and that they could do the same without it. In the case of generation Z, the percentage rises to 51%. The boom in master’s degrees has also reached human resources departments: the Society for Human Resource Management warns that more and more companies are replacing degree requirements with practical skills criteria. This represents a gap between young people who accumulate theoretical degrees and human resources offices, which are looking for talent prioritizing, not the paper that proves that you studied it. Context. The market for people with a master’s degree is saturated simply because there are too many master’s degrees: hyper-specific, online and blended, express… because non-qualifying higher education is a most lucrative business. In the United States between 2005 and 2021, the master’s degree offer grew by 69% to exceed 33,500 according to the Postsecondary Education and Economics Research Center. In Spain, more of the same: “The Spanish university in figures” collect that the offer of master’s degrees in Spain has skyrocketed by 54% since the implementation of the Bologna Plan, going from 2,626 to more than 4,000 official degrees. This boom has been driven exponentially by private universities, with enrollment growth of 250% more. Meanwhile, two things happened that helped this perfect storm: according to Lightcast data analyzed by the Wall Street Journal, the percentage of job offers that require a university degree fell to 17.8% in 2024 compared to 20.4% five years ago, a trend that already affects 87% of sectors. The second big problem of young graduates is called AI: while HR looks for decisive people, companies are betting on artificial intelligence for those junior positions essential to gain experience. In Spain they work, but with small print. The CYD 2024 report points out that in 2023 Spain reached the highest overqualification rate in the entire European Union: 35.8% of higher graduates between 20 and 64 years old work in low-skilled positions, compared to the 21.9% average in the EU. That is to say, it is not that these master’s degrees do not help you find a job, it is that they help you find a job below what they promise. Yes, but. Practical skills may be emerging as an important requirement for employability, but theory is one thing and practice another: although 85% of companies say they hire based on skills, when it comes down to it, only 1 in every 700 actual hires meets that criterion. according to a report joint Burning Glass Institute and Harvard Business School. On the other hand, there are master’s degrees and master’s degrees: we have already seen that the qualifications continue to work and there are also subjects with high demand that make them potentially attractive. In Xataka | If the question is “how can I earn more money throughout my life,” the answer is simple: by going to college In Xataka | The most in-demand master’s degrees right now in Spain: a volume of enrollees that continues to grow every year Cover | Irene Vega

The “ice man” has been frozen for 5,300 years. There is still life inside

In 1991, two German hikers they found each other with a corpse in the Alps, more specifically in the Ötztal Alps. At first they thought it would be a recent body, but nothing could be further from the truth: Ötzi, who takes his name from the place where he was found, died around 3255 BC. C. at approximately forty-six years of age due to hemorrhage caused by an arrow lodged in his left shoulder. Ötzi withstood the test of time thanks to glacial ice, becoming the oldest known natural human mummy in Europe. For science, the “iceman” has historically been a magnificent biological and archaeological record of the late Neolithic/Copper Age, bridging the gap, like someone who finds a painting in a cave. But a recent study It makes science look at it with different eyes: they have found life in Ötzi because the iceman is also an ecosystem. There is life within Ötzi. The Eurac Research research team has found yeast strains that could have been dormant for millennia, some of which are still metabolically active as they are especially adapted to the cold: Glaciozyma, Goffeauzyma, Mrakia and Phenoliferia. That is, living organisms have survived inside a human body for more than five thousand years. They also found anaerobic intestinal bacteria such as Romboutsia hominis, Clostridium moniliforme and Ruminococcus bromii, which when the Iceman was alive helped him digest elements of his diet at that time. Why is it important. The relevance of this discovery is enormous for both biology and archaeology, with implications that also point to space exploration: Biologically it is a real milestone: it is a before and after in what we know and can expect from microorganisms and their resistance. If microbes survive 5,300 years in alpine ice, they could potentially survive in similar inhospitable environments outside of Earth, such as the Moon’s south pole. And this has direct consequences for the search for extraterrestrial life. From an archaeological point of view, if a mummy contains microbial life inside, we must rethink how similar samples and other archaeological remains are preserved, stored and studied so as not to lose or degrade that valuable information. What the finding says about health before antibiotics. Some gut bacteria found in Ötzi are still present in modern humans, but others have disappeared from modern Western populations. Being able to compare your microbiome with ours allows you to have a photo of what the microbiota was like before antibiotics, ultra-processed foods and industrial agriculture and apply it to medicine. As already science has proventhe loss of this ancestral microbial diversity is associated with diseases such as Crohn’s or ulcerative colitis. In fact, Ötzi’s microbiome constitutes a good basis for designing more effective probiotics or improving fecal microbiota transplant therapies. How have they done it. Ötzi is available for visits at the South Tyrolean Archeology Museum in Bolzano, Italy, where he is kept in a cold room at -6°C and 99% relative humidity. After more than 30 years of studies, science has paradoxically introduced modern microbes into your body, so was essential use multiple samples and methods to differentiate which microorganisms were already present during Ötzi’s life and which colonized him later. From there, they combined genomic sequencing with laboratory culture and comparison with global databases, which for example allowed them to determine that the Methylobacterium and Sphingomonas bacteria found on the surface were introduced by modern humans, while Staphylococcus belonged to Ötzi’s original microbiome. Yes, but. The main limitation of the study is precisely contamination: handling a mummy exposes it to potential contamination by modern bacteria and fungi, which complicates the faithful reconstruction of its original microbial composition. On the other hand, the fact that a yeast shows activity in the laboratory does not prove that it has been active continuously for 5,300 years, since it could have been reactivated when the experimental conditions changed. To clear up doubts, more independent studies with other glacier mummies are necessary. In Xataka | In the 14th century, the “Little Ice Age” caught Europe completely off guard: this is how they managed to withstand the cold In Xataka | Getting up at 3:52 AM, putting your face in ice, rubbing a banana: the male “morning routine” taken to the extreme Cover | Museum of South Tyrol Archaeology, Eurac Research, Marion Lafogler and Andrea De Giovanni

In 1950, a millionaire got into a Bentley and achieved one of the greatest feats of the 24 Hours of Le Mans: completing them alone

June 11, 1955, the La Sarthe circuit signs the blackest day in its history. Juan Manuel Fangio and Mike Hawthorn dispute the lead of the race. A few hours have passed since the start when Hawthorn, who has just lapped Lance Macklin’s Austin, notices that his mechanics are signaling him to stop in the pits. Hawthorn, traveling at maximum speed, hits the brakes with all his might to make his stop. In those days, the pits and the straight were not physically separated, so try to maneuver at the last moment. Macklin, who is not expecting the maneuver, avoids Hawthorn’s Jaguar as best he can. But to his left, Pierre Levegh (also doubled) arrives launched. Fangio follows behind, both with a Mercedes. The first of them collides violently with Macklin’s Austin with the misfortune that British car becomes a take-off ramp that throws him against the audience of the crowded main stand. Pierre Levegh and 83 spectators die, although the race continues. That day, however, was a point in the history of Le Mans. The 1955 accident began constant improvements in the safety of the circuit and the race itself. Although Le Mans has been a race in constant evolution and other accidents have forced safety criteria to be modernized, something changed that year. Because, until then, Le Mans was a wild race. 3,200 kilometers alone Le Mans is a fascinating competition. It is one of the few strongholds of motorsports where the elite of world motorsports compete with amateur drivers. Right now, a person with enough money can set up a team and participate in the competition but it is necessary to have the necessary licenses in force. The FIA ​​divides drivers based on their driving experience and milestones achieved. Depending on the category in which the team is entered, federative requirements are different. It’s what’s left of those gentleman drivers as james deanrich people who were fond of motorsports who participated in official competitions, setting up their own team to face the squads supported by the manufacturers themselves. A formula that has survived over time but whose participants have been reduced to the point of exception. Those gentleman drivers They were by no means a rarity in the first half of the 20th century, so no one was surprised to see Eddie Hall on board a 4¼ Bentley. What was surprising is that no one took over from Hall. And until after the 1955 accident, at Le Mans it was not mandatory to change drivers and until well into the 80s it was not mandatory to have three drivers who, in addition, were revealed to have a maximum and minimum number of hours competed. They count in MotorSport Magazine that Eddie Hall was born into a wealthy family with a textile business in his hands. He was born in 1900 and before he reached his thirties he was already participating in official motorsport competitions. In fact, his passion for speed led him to participate in the Olympic Games in bobsleighthe sport invented by the Swiss in which four members of the same team launch themselves in a sled through an ice circuit. Fueled by a hunger for speed, Hall contacted Rolls-Royce to participate with one of its sports cars in the Mille Miglia, a historic Italian race that was practiced in open traffic. At that time, Rolls-Royce manufactured Bentley cars (the company had already won Le Mans before being purchased), the latter focused more on competition and the former on great trips. Bentley maintained competitive fame under the umbrella of Rolls-Royce and Eddie Hall ended up buying one of them to participate in the Italian race and it was the one that he would later use in the 24 Hours of Le Mans in 1950. It was a Bentley 4¼ and by then, that unit was already 16 years old and in the report of MotorSport Magazine They wonder if this sports car was not the oldest to complete the endurance test. With it he stood on the finish line of the La Sarthe Circuit, Eddie Hall would take the start since the car was his and, basically, he had put up the money to get there. Waiting for him in the pits was Tom Clarke, an Aston Martin driver who had been assigned as a teammate because at that time the teams had only two drivers. But although Clarke appears in the official race statisticsEverything indicates that he did not get into the car at any time. The reason was simple, Eddie Hall didn’t like sharing his cars and, after all, that was his car. In fact, they say that Hall’s own wife had to console her increasingly depressed companion when she became convinced that he was not going to travel a single meter that day aboard that Bentley 4¼. How did Eddie Hall do it? In Road & Track They only understand that the feat was possible by using drugs. In those years, Amphetamines were frequently used in all types of sports and it seems the most likely recipe for understanding how a man could stay awake and have enough reflexes to drive all night… and get his Bentley to the finish line in eighth place after covering more than 3,000 kilometers. The use of all types of drugs was known in the competition world. In Motorsport.comStirling Moss confessed to having used amphetamines, benzedrine or dexedrine. Coffee, alcohol and drugs was a more than usual cocktail for those who squeezed the most out of their bodies. A year later, Eddie Hall again participated in the 24 Hours of Le Mans aboard a Ferrari but this time he had to abandon mid-competition. No one has repeated the feat and no one will do it again since since 1985 the teams must have three drivers and none of them can drive more than four hours in a row in blocks of six hours, nor can they accumulate more than 14 hours throughout the entire competition day. Photo … Read more

It is the result of thousands of years of trial, error and Pasteur’s germ theory

Nowadays, a baby bottle is an everyday object, a safety standard sanitary that is made up of BPA-free plastics, tempered glass and high-quality silicone. However, behind this simplicity hides a great medical story about the origin of the baby bottle and the dark times he has gone through over the years. The origin. For a long time, the history of infant feeding was based on assumptions, but modern archaeological science has shed light on our ancestors. Here anthropological and archaeological studies have shown that non-maternal feeding practices have existed since Antiquity, evidenced by ceramic containers found in Greece, Rome and Egypt. But the most interesting discovery came from the hand from a publication in Nature in 2019, where researchers analyzed small terracotta vessels found in children’s graves from the Bronze Age and Iron Age. What they saw. Thanks to the analysis of isotopes and lipid residues adhered to the walls of the ceramic, the scientists confirmed the presence of ruminant milk in these containers. This is, to this day, the strongest direct chemical evidence for the use of containers that resembled our baby bottles in prehistoric times. A dark time. Moving forward in history, when traditional breastfeeding was not possible and wet nurses could not be used to feed the children, artificial feeding methods were used. But logically there were no baby bottles today, and that is why rudimentary alternatives such as rags and animal horns were chosen. However, pre-modern artificial feeding had a terrible cost, since between the 17th and 19th centuries, the first attempts to manufacture artificial feeding containers resulted in very high infant mortality. Because? Historical medical literature documents a direct and indisputable relationship between the use of unsafe baby bottles and the massive deaths of babies due to enteritis and diarrhea. At that time, the lack of hygiene turned these first containers into death traps full of problems. And this was a big problem, since at that time society began to see the population as authentic productivity machines. This meant that, if children died, there would not be enough workers in the future to continue growing the countries’ economies. It was about solving. To avoid this high infant mortality, at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century, “drops of milk” were established. They were charities created in France to distribute free sterilized milk to mothers who could not breastfeed their children and did not have the resources to pay wet nurses. They also arrived in Spain with the opening of the first center in San Sebastián in 1902, but they were also seen in Barcelona or Madrid to try to solve a very important problem. The new bottles. The transition to the modern baby bottle depended on materials technology, as the 19th century brought the transition to glass bottles, but a crucial element was missing to emulate breastfeeding: a durable, elastic nipple. But here industrial technology came into play, and in 1844 Charles Goodyear discovered the process of vulcanization of rubber, which shortly after allowed the adoption of rubber nipples, representing an immense functional improvement compared to the horns and rags of the past. The triumph of microbiology. Having glass bottles and rubber nipples did not stop infant mortality immediately, as the real turning point came not from design engineering, but from microbiology. In the 1860s, Louis Pasteur’s original work on germ theory changed the paradigm of medicine, and Pasteurian bacteriology radically transformed hygiene practices, prompting public health reforms and the systematic sterilization of baby bottles and milk. So, the combination of three elements such as teats, glass and advances in microbiological hygiene laid the definitive foundations for the safe and modern baby bottle that we have in our homes today. There are myths around. There are some ideas around the baby bottle that are wrong, such as that it was invented by accident, and the truth is that the literature describes us a gradual evolutionary progress towards the result we have today. And although it is true that Charles Windship registered a patent of baby bottles in the American database in 1841, historians agree that there is no consensus to attribute the invention of the “first modern baby bottle” to a single person, since there were multiple patents for baby bottles throughout the 19th century. Images | Lucy Wolski In Xataka | One baby, three parents (biological): a promising fertilization technique that, for now, we will not see in Spain

This is how the city combats the scorching summer heat

Every summer it gets hotter. That is a reality that The AEMET has confirmed for Spain and that also happens in France, as supported by Meteo France. The “micro” solution involves the proliferation of air conditioners in homes, businesses and offices, but that involves a considerable investment and another problem: climate change causes it to be hotter and the hotter it is, the more air conditioners are used. And the more they are used, the more heat they produce and climate change worsens. The fish that bites its tail. Already in 2018, air conditioning and fans represented almost 20% of the total electrical consumption of buildings in the world, according to IEA data. The International Energy Agency collect that global carbon dioxide emissions from air conditioning almost tripled between 1990 and 2022, exceeding one billion tons of carbon dioxide. In cities it is even worse: the urban heat island hits hard. Faced with this reality, Paris has been setting up for decades an answer in the form of infrastructure: a centralized air conditioning for the entire city. The great air conditioning of Paris. Instead of each home or each building solving the thermal problem on its own, the French capital is committed to turning it into an infrastructure such as the sewage network. The system is called Fraîcheur de Paris. The operation it’s simple: a network of buried pipes 120 kilometers long through which very cold water (between 2 and 4 °C) travels to the almost thousand connected buildings. There it absorbs its heat with an exchanger and is cooled again to the 15 production and storage plants. How does it get cold there? With the water of the Seine River as a thermal sink. Of course, the water from the river and the system never mix. This system allows the system to take advantage of the natural temperature of the river to cool without additional electrical consumption in cold seasons. To manage peak demand without installing more plants, the system stores cold at night, when electricity is cheaper and the environment is colder. At that time, the tanks accumulate the cold with ice and release it during the hottest hours of the day, which reduces costs and improves performance. The map of the Fraîcheur de Paris. Fraicheur of Paris Why is it important. Faced with a global problem of rising temperatures, addressing it communally is better than letting everyone go to war on their own in terms of efficiency and use strategy. The numbers back it up: the EU Covenant of Mayors details that the network achieves more than 100% energy efficiency, 35% less electricity, 90% less refrigerant emissions and 50% less CO₂ compared to equivalent autonomous installations. On the other hand, the operating system of standard air conditioning units (with a compressor outside) worsens the problem and adds it to a vicious circle: when there is a lot of urban heat, the air conditioners work longer hours, which increases carbon dioxide emissions and dumps more waste heat into the street, causing the ambient temperature to rise. By directing all that heat into the Seine instead of expelling it into the streets, the network interrupts that cycle. Context. The heat in Paris is not a distant problem: it is already here, as advanced by the official French meteorological agency, which estimates a warming of +2.7 °C in France by 2050, at which time heat waves, droughts and floods will be more frequent and intense. By then, infrastructure should be prepared to withstand them. A couple of examples: Zaragoza is preparing a work against floods and Valencia more of the same. Paris does the same in the face of heat. Thus, in October 2023 he organized “Paris at 50 °C” (Paris at 50 °C), an exercise in which two neighborhoods participated in a crisis simulation in the form of a heat wave. In this futuristic and probable scenario, the cold stops being a luxury typical of hotels and shopping centers and becomes something of a basic necessity. In detail. The system was born as an association of several merchants in the late 70s to air condition their premises, becoming the prelude to a planned municipal project. Back in 1991 there was public service concession to Climespace, a subsidiary of ENGIE, for 30 years. Since 2022 its management is carried out by a joint venture public – private formed by ENGIE and the Autonomous Administration of Parisian Transport. It has a 20-year exploitation contract that covers production, storage, transportation and distribution of cold for a projected value of 2.4 billion euros. This urban air conditioning system has a signed expansion plan: The current concession agreement has among its commitments to extend the network by an additional 158 kilometers, 20 new production plants. The idea is to cover all neighborhoods in Paris and reach more than 3,000 subscribers, including more small businesses, hospitals, daycares, nursing homes, such as explains Raphaëlle Nayralthe general secretary of the Fraicheur de Paris. Yes, but. The Fraicheur de Paris is designed for the French capital and works well there, based on operating numbers and growth expectations, but that does not imply that it is an exportable model for all cities. In fact, it needs three conditions that Paris does meet: a high population density that justifies the investment in buried pipes, a river with sufficient flow to function as a heat sink, and a local administration with the capacity to sign contracts of that size and duration. On the other hand, and despite its expansion, the network still covers only part of the city, so the benefit is only for a part of the population: if everything started in the 90s and a major expansion is expected for 2042, it is clear that it is not an easy project, nor a cheap one, nor one that can be done overnight. In Xataka | Paris has managed to calm its traffic. Now he needs a much more difficult thing: getting his birds back. In Xataka | AEMET … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.