YouTube

How to watch YouTube without ads and in the background without paying for YouTube Premium or installing fake apps

by

Let’s tell you How can you watch YouTube without ads on your mobile or computerand even with the option to watch the videos in the background. These are features available to paying users on YouTube Premiumbut we are going to tell you how to do it without paying. We are going to do this using third-party apps, but without resorting to fake applications or those that are a modified YouTube and that expose you to privacy dangers. Nor are they the apps to listen to music on YouTube as if it were Spotify. Some browsers will help you with this There are three key functions that YouTube Premium offers you, which is to watch videos without ads, listen to their audio in the background, or even use the mode Qicture-in-Picture with which to watch videos in a floating window while you are using another application. This is something you can do with other paid apps. The trick is use some specific browsers instead of Chrome or Safari. They are perfectly normal, safe and legal browsers, so you don’t need to go around installing modified versions of YouTube that are going to become a problem for your privacy. There are three very popular browsers that you can use for this, which are Brave, Firefox and Vivaldithe latter with the extra of being a European alternative. You can find these browsers both in the official application store of your mobile phone, and you can also download them to your computer. Brave is the best option for mobileas it allows you to use PiP mode to have the video play in an overlay window while you do other things. Vivaldi, on the other hand, only removes the ads, which is no small feat either. Just remember, you have to use YouTube from the browsernot from the app, entering m.youtube.com. For background playback With Brave, you’ll need to turn it on in the app’s settings. For this you will have to enter the configuration, and in the section Multimedia. Here activate background playback. For the computer any of the three options are goodsince they will allow you to watch YouTube without ads. This is due to the internal blockers they have. In Xataka Basics | How to use Gemini to summarize YouTube videos or ask questions about their content on Android

‘Baby Shark’ is the most successful song in YouTube history. It is also the least profitable of all

by

It has already gone somewhat out of fashion, at least in terms of omnipresence at children’s parties, birthdays and meetings with children, but in those transition years between the birth of YouTube and the current flood of children’s content generated by AIs and insane algorithms on the platform, ‘Baby Shark‘It was a monumental success. One that, however, did not make its creators millionaires, unlike what many of us came to believe. Baby Shark, the legend. The infectious original song, since its publication on YouTube in June 2016, has accumulated an average of more than 4.7 million daily views. Now it’s at 16.4 billion views. Success transcends borders: available in 25 different languages, the United States leads as the main market in number of views, while Brazil holds the record in number of “likes.” In 2020, it dethroned ‘Despacito’ as the most viewed content on YouTube. And the distance continues to grow: ‘Despacito’ remains at 8.86 billion views, and ‘Baby Shark’ already doubles it. As The Wall Street Journal saysto get an idea of ​​the dimensions of the achievement: the amount is approximately equivalent to the sum of Taylor Swift’s ten most popular music videos on the platform. There is no money. Despite the records, Pinkfong, the South Korean company that created the song, barely generated $67 million in 2024. The reason: child privacy restrictions drastically limit its advertising monetization. In September 2019, Google agreed to pay 170 million dollars to resolve accusations of systematic violations of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). The US Federal Trade Commission determined that the platform had collected cookies and IP addresses from children under 13 years of age to serve you personalized advertisingwithout obtaining parental consent. The sanction (136 million for the FTC, 34 million for the State of New York) represented the largest fine imposed until then for violations of this type. The investigation revealed that YouTube advertised itself among toy brands such as Mattel and Hasbro as a leader in reaching children ages 6 to 11. Changes for Baby Shark. This fine led to YouTube banning personalized advertising in “Made for Kids” content as of January 2020. Additionally, it disabled features such as comments, subscription notifications, playlists, and live chat. The economic impact was notable: Children’s content creators reduced their production by 18% and views fell by 20%. Profits plummeted between 60% and 90% compared to content with personalized advertising. Others affected. Other big names in children’s entertainment also saw stars with YouTube’s decision. Cocomelonwhich has two of the ten videos confirmed significant revenue losses after the removal of personalized advertising. Chris Williams, co-founder of pocket.watch (a digital studio specialized in children’s content), said that the main channels in the sector, such as the Indian ChuChu TV, had experienced drops between 50% and 60% in their advertising revenue since January 2020. To survive. Faced with monetization restrictions, Pinkfong has built a diversified business model where YouTube advertising represents only a fraction of its revenue. According to data from the first half of 202568% of its sales now come from content distribution (YouTube, but also Netflix and live shows), while merchandising contributes 15%, licensing 10%, and the remaining segment corresponds to video games and other digital products. This allowed the company to achieve a profit of approximately 13 million dollars in 2024 on total revenues of 67 million. Of course, its CEO has already spoken of integrating artificial intelligence and data analysis in content creation. No more viral bombs. In Xataka | Baby Shark (doo doo doo doo doo doo): when a children’s song also sweeps the stock market

Many video AIs are learning to imitate the world. And everything points to an unprecedented “looting” of YouTube

by

A square, tourists, a waiter moving between tables, a bike passing by in the background or a journalist on a set. Video AIs can now generate scenes in a flash. The result is surprising, but it also opens up a question that until recently was barely posed: where did all those images that have come from come from? allowed to learn to imitate the world? According to The Atlanticpart of the answer points to millions of videos pulled from platforms like YouTube without clear consent. The euphoria over generative AI has moved so quickly that many questions have been left behind. In just two years we have gone from curious little experiments to models that produce videos almost indistinguishable from the real thing. And while the focus was on the demonstrations, another issue was gaining weight: transparency. OpenAI, for example, has explained that Sora is trained with “publicly available” data, but has not detailed which one. A massive workout that points to YouTube The Atlantic piece gives a clear clue as to what was happening behind the scenes. We are talking about more than 15 million videos collected to train AI models, with a huge amount coming from YouTube without formal authorization. Among the initiatives cited are data sets associated with several companies, designed to improve the performance of video generators. According to the media, this process was carried out without notifying the creators who originally published that content. One of the most striking aspects of the discovery is the profile of the affected material. These were not just anonymous videos or home recordings, but informative content and professional productions. The media found that thousands of pieces came from channels belonging to publications such as The New York Times, BBC, The Guardian, The Washington Post or Al Jazeera. Taken together, we are talking about a huge volume of journalism that would have ended up feeding AI systems without prior agreement with their owners. runwayone of the companies that has given the most impetus to generative video, is highlighted in the reviewed data sets. According to the documents cited, their models would have learned with clips organized by type of scene and context: interviews, explanatory, pieces with graphics, kitchen plans, resource plans. The idea is clear: if AI must reproduce human situations and audiovisual narratives, it needs real references that cover everything from gestures to editing rhythms. Fragments of a video generated with the Runway tool In addition to Runway, the research mentions data sets used in laboratories of large technology platforms such as Meta or ByteDance in research and development of their models. The dynamic was similar: huge volumes of videos collected on the Internet and shared between research teams to improve audiovisual capabilities. YouTube’s official stance doesn’t leave much room for interpretation. Its regulations prohibit downloading videos to train modelsand its CEO, Neal Mohan, has reiterated it in public. The expectations of the creators, he stressed, involve their content being used within the rules of the service. The appearance of millions of videos in AI databases has brought that legal framework to the fore and has intensified pressure on platforms involved in the development of generative models. The reaction of the media sector has followed two paths. On the one hand, companies like Vox Media o Prisa have closed agreements to license their content to artificial intelligence platforms, looking for a clear framework and economic compensation. On the other hand, some media outlets have chosen to stand up: The New York Times has taken OpenAI and Microsoft to court for the unauthorized use of their materials, stressing that it will also protect the video content it distributes. The legal terrain remains unclear. Current legislation was not intended for models that process millions of videos in parallel, and courts are still beginning to draw the lines. For some experts, publishing openly is not equivalent to transferring training rightswhile AI companies defend that indexing and the use of public material are part of technological advancement. This tension, still unresolved, keeps media and developers in a constant game of balance. What we have before us is the start of a conversation that goes far beyond technology. Training AI models with material available on the internet has been a widespread practice for years, and now comes the time to decide where the limits are. Companies promise agreements and transparency, the media ask for guarantees and creators demand control. The next stage will be as technological as it is political: how artificial intelligence is fed will define who benefits from it. Images | Xataka with Gemini 2.5 In Xataka | All the big AIs have ignored copyright laws. The amazing thing is that there are still no consequences

YouTube is ready to launch the largest video reconstruction project in history. And yes, it will use AI

by

YouTube was born in 2005 and, since then, it has become the largest audiovisual archive in recent history. For years, millions of users uploaded videos in 240p or 480p because that was what the cameras, connections and devices of the moment allowed. This material does not lose value because it has low resolution: there are extraordinary pieces that continue to be a reference. But today the screens are better, the sound matters more and that difference is noticeable. So now comes an attempt to update that experience without erasing the past. An ocean of videos. The YouTube catalog is not large: it is huge. The figures published by electroiq put the total at around 4.3 billion videos in 2025, after a stage in which the Shorts format It pushed the increases to levels never seen before. About 800 million were added in 2023 alone. That momentum has tempered, in part because of controls on repetitive content and a lower craze for short clips, but the trend remains. If the current pace continues, the service could surpass 10 billion videos before 2030. YouTube begins to “reconstruct” its videos. YouTube has announced that will begin to automatically improve videos uploaded in resolutions between 240p and 720p, raising them to HD quality using artificial intelligence. The process does not delete the original files or modify the base video: it is an alternative version visible under the “super resolution” label. Creators will be able to decide if they want it to be applied and viewers will retain the option to view the content in its original resolution. It is a measure that seeks to modernize the archive without altering its authenticity. Lens: 4K. The roadmap is clear. After starting with videos below 1080p, YouTube wants automatic enhancement also reach 4K resolutions “in the short term,” according to its announcement. To support that jump, heavier uploads are already being tested with some creators and thumbnails will also be able to reach 4K, thanks to the extension of the file limit from 2 MB to 50 MB. Everything points to an attempt by the platform to ensure that both the content and its presentation are at the level of current panels. The audio also goes up a notch. The modernization of the catalog does not stop at the visual. YouTube has also introduced automatic audio enhancements that adjust the mix and maintain a more consistent volume between different scenes. These automatic improvements are grouped under the “Stable volume“, which the viewer can activate or deactivate according to their preference. With this, the company seeks to prevent sound jumps from breaking the experience, something common in old videos or recordings with basic equipment. It will not be for all videos. YouTube clarifies that these improvements will not be applied indiscriminately. They will only affect videos uploaded in low resolution that have not been previously remastered to 1080p or higher. Additionally, as we already mentioned, creators can decide from YouTube Studio whether they want the platform to apply visual or audio enhancements to their future uploads. It is a measure that seeks to avoid unwanted distortions and give room to those who prefer to keep their content exactly as it was published. If these enhancements are disabled for the channel, viewers may not be able to use features such as “Stable volume” or “Super resolution” on that content. Upscaling no longer lives on your TV. Many televisions include their own systems to improve the image, but YouTube’s approach is different. Instead of applying upscaling on the device, the platform does it in the cloud, allowing it to process millions of videos consistently without depending on the user’s hardware. Additionally, the viewer can choose between the original playback or the enhanced version from the quality menu, with an option visible and explicit in the interface. Catalog, discovery, legacy. For creators, this update has an immediate benefit: they don’t need to re-upload old videos to make them look better on current screens. The file remains intact and the enhancement is applied as an additional layer, respecting the original. This can help valuable pieces from years ago gain presence, without altering their essence. The viewer, for their part, receives a more homogeneous experience and the possibility of choosing how to view each content. Images | Xataka with Gemini 2.5 | CardMapr In Xataka | NVIDIA has risen to the top for its AI data centers. Your next big leap: cars

YouTube can end up becoming something more important for Google than your search engine

by

The race to dominate the AI It has many legs And, one of them is undoubtedly developing The perfect search engine. There is also a clear intention of several technological giants by Destrone Google in one of your most prolific businesses. However, Google is not passed without doing anything while the AI ​​career advances by leaps and bounds. In fact, it has an ace in the sleeve that perhaps few have seen coming: YouTube. And it is that the video platform could become the most powerful weapon of the company to continue growing in AI. The searches conquer. Google knows that artificial intelligence can be an existential threat to its search engine, the main source of income of the company for decades. That’s why he has been vitaminating Gemini and joining his abilities to Search through summaries with Ai overViews either The full search engine with AI that the company plans to launch soon worldwide. Meanwhile, chatgpt and other language models eat the toast with very useful capabilities for users, such as being able to answer user questions directly While searches are made On the Internet without clicking links or advertising. A perfect shield. However, YouTube works radically differently, since here the AI ​​is not a threat, but A competitive advantage. And while the search engine must deal with chatbots from other companies, YouTube can use AI in its favor to generate more content, improve its recommendations algorithm and, above all, multiply their monetization opportunities. All this knowing that it is a platform without any serious rival to date. Video against text. Analyst Ben Thompson, from the specialized media Stratechery, Point out That video is an inherently more monetizable format than the text, and the recent history of social networks demonstrates it. Twitter, Facebook and Instagram began as text and photos, but they have all ended up focusing on the video because it is what really hooks most users. Tiktok understood from the beginning: The most addictive content does not come from your contact network, but from an algorithm that shows you the most entertaining videos, wherever they come from. And YouTube has been doing exactly for almost two decades. Numbers that speak for themselves. YouTube It is the most watched streaming service on televisionsahead of Netflix. It is the dominant mobile application and computer for video consumption. And, above all, he has paid More than 100,000 million dollars to creators in the last four years. That figure does not even include the income that creators obtain for collaborations with brands, which usually overcome what they earn by advertising. YouTube is no longer just a platform, but an entire economy AI as an accelerator, not as a threat. Google is integrating the technology of its Deepmind division directly on YouTube, and the results are promising. The platform He has just announced tools based on I see 3its video generation model, which allow any user to create clips for YouTube Shorts from the mobile and for free. The result? A content tsunami generated by AI That, although mostly it will be irrelevant, annoying and ends up subtracting authenticity from the platform, it will also generate more videos in less time and, in large part, their tools can be used so that creators use them to generate really good videos. And YouTube already has its own algorithm to separate the grain from the straw. Each element of a video is a business opportunity. But Google’s master play with AI on YouTube has nothing to do with creating videos, but by monetizing them. The company has started trying A system that uses artificial intelligence to automatically identify products that appear in the videos and label them at the exact moment in which they are mentioned or shown. “Each element of each YouTube video is on its way to becoming a monetizable surface,” assures Thompson. Imagine to see a video of home reforms and be able to buy with a single click any tool that appears, even if it is in the background. It is the humid dream of every marketing giant. An invisible giant. Sometimes we forget YouTube. In fact, many analysts, including Thompson, who even He recognizes itThey have underestimated the platform for years. Most people prefer to consume entertainment in video and YouTube format have always been there, growing unstoppable and sometimes even invisible. The finish line, applied by Google. Thompson already He warned months ago about the potential of the AI ​​to convert each content pixel into advertising inventory, but then thought of a goal. The irony is that Google, who arrived late by offering the mass public tools of generative after Bard’s disastrous launchit is now who has arrived first with this technology. As assures Thompson, goal must still develop the necessary models and infrastructure; Google already has them working. Cover image | Google and Collabstr In Xataka | The MIT has studied the impact of AI on companies. Its conclusion: only 5% of the time changes some really

This is the economy of the YouTube star

by

Jordi Wild is one of the most prominent content creators in Spanish speech. In the non -quantifiable part, your podcast ‘The Wild Project’ is tremendously influentialand generate millions of viewers and listen every month. However, there is not so much talk about the Jordi Wild entrepreneur, which has managed to build an authentic empire. Your figure It is not far from the controversy and the controversybut the numbers are indisputable: Jordi is doing well. An unstoppable ascent. The YouTuber and Podcasts created its YouTube channel ‘in 2013The Rincón de Giorgio‘, initially with a content very similar to that of others of his time: gameplaysreaction and parodies videos. But soon he cultivated it with a more personal content: current debates, criminal psychology … in 2020 he started with ‘The Wild Project’, which currently On YouTube It approaches the 7 million subscribers, and more than 95,000 in podimo. Its impact is reflected in the waves that it won last year and also in its accounts, deposited in the Mercantile Registry and have analyzed In digital economy. The numbers. In 2024, his company Project Entertainment reached a turnover of 2.4 million euros, which represents a growth of no less than 40% compared to 1.7 million 2023. Translation: benefits of 1.35 million, with an increase close to 20% compared to the previous year, where 1.1 million was reached. There is another way of saying it: Mercadona’s net benefit is 4%, Inditex’s 15%, Jordi Wild’s 56%. The comparison is unfair, of course: the business volume is neither remotely comparable and Jordi Wild has much more growth space than these consolidated companies, but the comparison makes sense in terms of business. And more numbers. Project Entertainment is in Manresa, and in 2024 he contributed 114,945 euros in taxes on benefits, approximately 8% of his profits before taxes. Of these benefits, Wild allocated 344,000 euros additional to voluntary reserves to strengthen heritage and withdrew 1,007 million in dividends, in compensation for his work. The company has a net assets of 1.9 million euros, with a short -term debt of 209,000 euros. Total assets reach 2.14 million euros, highlighting 1.7 million in cash and other liquid assets, along with 200,000 euros in financial investments. Where does that money come from? It is estimated that ‘The Wild Project’ generates monthly income of between 200,000 and 300,000 euros, equivalent to more than 8,000 euros per day. This project is one of your company’s main financial engines. Jordi Wild counted on The podcast ‘The Yellow Placita’ that “right now I have annual sponsorships (Thanks to those who) There may be months between 200,000 and 300,000 euros. (…) All this talking about ‘The Wild Project’, which has been catapulted economically because it is very well paid. “ Not everything is glory. Of course, not everything is profits in Jordi Wild’s emporium. There have been projects that They have not come forward and that he has had to freeze, as an idea for an indie horror video game whose development was arrested for a disagreement between him and the study that was programming him. Or the Dogfight Wild Tournament 3, the fighting tournament without rules that raised and cost about 800,000 euros, of which the youtuber recovered just over half for sales and sponsorships, thus registering The greatest economic loss of his career. In Xataka | Jpelirrojo and Soyunapringada have starred in some of the most notorious internet Broks. And they have started again

I’ve been paying Youtube Premium for years and I don’t regret it. The problem is that going back is impossible

by

I do not know since when I have Premium YouTube, but the first track in my mail is a cancellation notice of September 2018. Spoiler: At two months I went back to discharge. There is something uncomfortable for many people to admit that you pay for Youtube premium. It is like confessing that you have gone to a sophisticated blackmail. But here I am. I keep paying, and I don’t regret it. I took the step after an annoying epiphany: I was watching a long video and interrupted me for the fifth time with an ad. It was not just the discomfort, but The feeling of being manipulated by an algorithm that had calculated exactly how much I could torture me before he left the platform. Google knows that YouTube is a de facto monopoly and acts as such. Youtube premium changed how consumption content. Without interruptions, I can follow long documentaries without losing the thread. The platform was a library of knowledge again, not a sequence of advertising cuts. The creators who continue to charge more with my subscription than with ads. And as a gift comes YouTube Musickilling two birds of a shot: perfect to solve The Garminoblivious to Apple Music. The model is perverse but effective: degrade the free experience to make it annoying and then sell the solution. It works because YouTube has trained a whole generation to tolerate constant interruptions. We have normalized to cut our thought Every three minutes. But here comes the most insidious: Premium is an entrance drug to an interruption without interruptions. Once that experience tests, go back it becomes impossible. Google knows it. They have hooked not only to their content, but to their version of digital comfort. That accumulated time and constant interruptions are worth more than what the subscription costs. Each announcement avoided is time that I dedicate to something that really interests me. Pure self -defense in an economy that monetizes our attention. I’ve been paying for years and I will continue to do so. Not because the system seems fair to me, but because I have decided that my mental tranquility is worth more than my resistance. In the era of digital monopolies, this is the closest thing to freely choosing that we are going to get. In Xataka | Arc, I apologize for what I said about you, you are the best browser in the world Outstanding image | Omar al-Ghosson

YouTube has built its empire as an individual use platform. Now hugging group consumption

by

Since its inception, YouTube was synonymous with personal entertainment: short videos we saw alone on the computer or on the mobile. However, the video platform has adapted to the times, investing great efforts to become the main streaming platform also on smart TV. And it is a long time since YouTube also won our rooms. More Smart TV, more YouTube. The platform has gone from being a simple alternative to traditional television, its main competitor. According to the last Nielsen datathe platform already represents 12.5% of the total television viewing time in the United States, surpassing Netflix and other streaming services. In fact, according to study figures, US users now pass an average of More than one billion hours a day watching YouTube on its televisions. In Spain, the platform is also sweeping at Smart TV. We have the example in The Barlovento Study in which they explain that, only in June 2025, 10.1 million unique users agreed to YouTube from their television connected in Spain. The sofa phenomenon. This migration to large screens has completely changed consumption behavior. It is not for less, because the smart TV now provide greater facilities When reproducing content from YouTube or any streaming service. Sending content from the mobile is easier than ever, and also many content creators have also adapted their videos to television consumption, with much more elaborate and more ‘suitable’ productions to enjoy them on the big screen (more resolution, production levels, rhythm, etc.). In WSJ They highlight the statements of American YouTube stars such as Rhett & Link with their “Good Mythical Morning” program, who confirm that 53% of their visualizations come from televisions. Group consumption is increasingly widespread, and it is no longer so strange to wear a background background video on TV with family and friends around. Longer, more professional content. Producers and content creators have quickly captured this trend and are adapting their content. Long -lasting proposals (more than 15 minutes) have experienced an exponential growthespecially on televisions. We see this trend reflected from star canals such as Mrbeast and Yes Theory to national referents such as Ibai Llanos, Jordi Wild or Clavero, among many others, where productions of more than half an hour, with professional equipment and with a content adapted to play it on a television with family and friends. In addition to because many times the content asks for it, there are also other reasons: to maintain the viewer’s attention for a longer time and maximize advertising income through intermediate ads. Between the lines. YouTube has not forgotten the consumption of individual content. In fact, their shorts They are paving their transformation towards a multiformat and multidispositive content platform. A strategy that combines the best of both worlds without giving up the original YouTube DNA. In the United States and other regions, the platform has greater similarities to the rest of streaming platforms, since it has functions such as “shows” (which allows you to see complete seasons such as in Netflix and many others), traditional television channels and personalized recommendations adapted to large screens. The conquest of the TV by YouTube is a battle that has been fighting for many yearsonly that they have taken more than what they expected, partly for the arrival of new technologies to televisions to further facilitate their use. The price of success. This transition to group consumption is also accompanied by an increasing advertising saturation. Ads can occupy between 15% and 20% of the total visualization time, especially on televisions, where YouTube has implemented specific interactive formats such as QR codes for direct purchases. The platform has also hardened Measures against advertising blockersconverting Premium YouTube into the only official escape route for an interruption experience. And now what. YouTube is in a unique position: it has made streaming overcome for the first time in history to combined traditional television and cable consumption in its predominant region, according to Nielsen. His next challenge will be to maintain the balance between aggressive monetization and the user experience, especially when more and more content creators who seek user attention arise. Analysts like Wells Fargo They suggest that Netflix should invest 500 million dollars to attract 20-30 from the main creators of YouTube, although several assured WSJ that there is no check large enough to abandon the audiences they have built for years. Exclusive productions as long as streaming platforms is common in large content creators such as the case of The Beast Games Mrbeast in Prime Video. Leaving a channel after so many years to create exclusive content on a platform such as Netflix, Prime or HBO, is something else. Cover image | Xataka Smart Home In Xataka | Tiktok has been contaminating the rest of the social networks for years. Thanks to that, YouTube is going very well

It is not you, YouTube is filling with more and more ads. Especially if you see it on a smart TV

by

Are you noticing, Even if you think it may only be a sensation of yoursthat youtube has more and more advertising? It is not yours: since it began to include advertising in 2007, YouTube has progressively increase the ads. Currently, in supports such as televisions, the high doses of spots that cannot be skipped begin to be striking. YouTube is winning the game to traditional television, yes, but … at what price? Is it true that there are more and more YouTube ads? From a time to this part they have increased on all platforms, but there is a space where they have done very clearly: on televisions. In these devices new formats of specific interactive ads For connected televisions, such as FEEDS of products and QR codes that allow direct purchase from the big screen. And there are already figures of the good result they are giving: more than 50 million monthly average conversions in the fourth quarter of 2024, that is, a very notable growth in the quantity and effectiveness of the ads in this environment The TV rules. Although your YouTube consumption platform is the mobile or computer, you are a minority: as we talked a few weeks ago, YouTube has grown up on Smart TVS in recent years. According to Nielsenthe video platform has experienced a constant and significant general growth, more than 120 % since 2021. For us to get an idea: in May 2025, it occupied the leading position between platforms of streamingwith 12.5 % of the total viewing on television, above Netflix or Prime Video: Advanceing traditional television on their own land and even its direct rivals. EVewhere ads. The ads have become a continuous presence on YouTube. However, there was a time, approximately for a decade, in which YouTube ads were Much less invasive (Mainly banners, discreet and static, located at the bottom or side of the screen, which barely interfere with the visualization experience). But soon the changes began to accelerate. More and more. Already in 2008 there were prompt pre -rol ads (before the video), in the first Google tests to monetize the platform. Its generalized implementation was consolidated as of 2010, when YouTube introduced the pre -rol, post-volt ads, both saltable and non-saltable for long and monetizable videos. Since 2018 changes began to accelerate. For example, that year the ads arrived in pairs, with the excuse that with longer interruptions there would be less number of advertising pauses. In 2019, the ads that could not be jumping in the first fifteen seconds (sometimes in pairs) landed. And in 2020, not saltable ads for 60 seconds. More frequency. At the momentYouTube ads can occupy between 15% and 20% of the total display time of a video. It is common to find two or three ads in videos of 10 minutes and up to five interruptions in videos of more than 15 minutes. In addition, it has continued to increase the amount of non-saltable ads, the Mid-Roll (in the middle of the video), Bumper ADS (of 6 seconds without jumping option) and interactive formats. In addition, YouTube has implemented more aggressive measures in recent times so that you do not skip the ads: for example, although pauses reproduction on your smart TV, The ads will continue; And besides They have complicated the use of adblockers and other systems to avoid advertising. Experience of experience. Can this assume a problem for the future? For the moment, Complaints are piled up Because, among other things, the only way to avoid advertising is paying the rate of Youtube premiumwhich does not have especially affordable prices. It must also be taken into account, as detailed by the Linked article of El Confidencial, that the average daily use of YouTube is 20 minutes and 19 seconds, well above other platforms such as Instagram (8:15) or Tiktok (3:51), which makes advertising saturation a higher risk for its users. In Xataka | YouTube’s last idea is to prevent you from watching videos if you use advertisement blockers

How to use Gemini to summarize YouTube videos or ask questions about its Android content

by

Let’s explain How to summarize YouTube videos or ask questions about them using Gemini on Android. Both artificial intelligence and the video platform belong to Google, so they get along very well between them, and it is easy to interact. With this simple method, when you are watching a video on your mobile and do not have time to see it whole, you can ask Gemini a summary or ask specific questions. For example, if it is a recipe you can ask you to remind you of the amount of salt you should throw, and if it is a video of tricks you can ask you for a concrete one or ask any other type of question. To be able to use this trick, Gemini must be your main assistant on your mobile. If it has not been assigned as a default assistant, you can follow the steps of our article on How to change the Google Assistant for Gemini On your Android mobile. Ask Gemini about a YouTube video The first thing you have to do is open YouTube and be reproducing the video on which you want to ask the question. So, invokes Google Gemini. The AI ​​will recognize that you are watching a YouTube video, and above the writing field will show you two shortcuts. Here, you have to click on the option Ask questions about this video that will appear in the emerging window. When you choose that option, Gemini will add the URL of the YouTube video, and will allow you to write or talk to ask the question you want. Here, when the window is already with the added video, Ask him to make you a summary about the videoeither writing the request with natural language or using the option to speak. Then, directly in the emerging window you will see A textual summary of the videoincluding points of interest and concrete moments in which certain things are said. The summary will be short, but explaining the content well. You can also ask other specific questions related to the content of the video. Gemini will be able to analyze everything that is said in it, and will answer you to any questions you ask. Therefore, You no longer need to see the whole video To get the answers, you can save time in long videos with this function. In Xataka Basics | The best PROMPTS to save working hours and do your homework with Chatgpt, Gemini, Copilot or other artificial intelligence

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.