apple

After the emergence of Deepseek, the “seven magnificent” of the Tech industry have collapsed in the stock market. All except Apple

by

The year began well for Nvidia. On January 29, 2025 its capitalization I reached The 3.49 billion dollars and everything seemed to go on wheels. The Surprise arrival of Deepseek R1 It changed things a lot and joined other factors to cause spectacular collapse. Two months later, this Nvidia market capitalization is 2.77 billion dollars: it is almost 21% less. That effect has been contagious, but one of the greats is falling the storm. Apple. As they point out In five daysthat January 25, 2025 Apple had a capitalization of 3.55 billion dollars, and at this time that value is 3.35 billion, 5.6% fall. Sensitive, of course, but much less than that of its rivals of the group of “The Magnificent Seven”. That they have stayed in … Not so magnificent. Next to the fall of Nvidia are those of Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Tesla – as we say, is saved a little. If we analyze the evolution of market capitalization of the seven the performance of these two last months, the “average” drop is 13.5%. They have lost more than two billion dollars compared to 15.58 billion dollars in late January, a real collapse. It’s not just care. The impact of Deepseek has not been the only factor that has contributed to those falls. They have had a lot to do The recent tariffs That is imposing Trump to imports of all kinds of products – foreign cars They are the last victims-. These taxes and Trump’s protectionist policy are forcing many companies to restructure their strategy, and investors – and consumers – are clear what the impact of all this will be: price increases everywhere. Why does Apple endure? Of the great technology, Apple is the only one that has managed to mitigate the losses relatively. Probably partly because of his “warm” attitude to AI. Your interest in data centers fever It is practically nulland despite the Recent criticism It is clear that it is not “burning money” as other companies in the sector do. The rest of the group has invested true fortunes In this segment, although some They are stopping. Bubble in sight? These days are 25 years of the bubble of the Puntocom, and what is happening with the great technology and the AI ​​segment does fear for an AI bubble. There are certainly similarities between both situations, but also important differences. Apple, especially solid. Cupertino’s company is usually More immune that their rivals to these fluctuations in the world of finance. In the face of complaints about the relative lack of innovation or New disruptionsApple has managed to diversify income – especially with the expansion of its services – and continues to maintain confidence of both investors and users. Image | Zhang Kaiyv In Xataka | Deepseek R1 is not just another AI model: it is the greatest existential threat that Silicon Valley has faced

Apple Intelligence is a “fire” for Apple. The firefighter chosen to turn it off is the chief of the vision pro

by

Apple has decided to replace the head of Siri and its strategy in AI after several months with delays and problems with Apple Intelligence. Mike Rockwell, until now head of the Vision Pro project, is the one who takes control of Siri to replace John Giannandreaas reported Bloomberg. Why is it important. This change reflects the concern to increase Apple for its position in the AI ​​race. Tim Cook would have “lost confidence” in Giannandrea after numerous delays in the development of promised functions during WWDC 2024, as Mark Gurman explained. Between bambalins. In a recent internal meeting, Giannandrea admitted to his team that the delays were “ugly” and recognized the shame and anger that this had generated among the staff. The uncertainty about the launch dates caused internal tensions that climbed up to Apple’s address. Apple He was strong for Apple Intelligence in his event for developers Nine months ago, but the implementation has been extremely slow. Just a few weeks ago they had to announce that The personalized functions of Siri postponed up to 2026one of the key pieces of your strategy. The context. AI is the new battlefield for great technological ones. While rivals like Microsoft, Google and OpenAi have taken giant steps with their assistants and generative models, Apple has lagged behind with a Siri that has barely evolved in years. A risky bet. Rockwell lacks specific experience in AI, but Apple, as published by Bloomberghas valued its ability to solve complex problems and bring new products to the market. As responsible for Vision Promanaged teams of thousands of people and managed to launch a revolutionary product to the market, despite the many obstacles that were on the road. It is inevitable to ask if the person responsible for a very complex product, but with discreet commercial impact in its first year in the market, is the ideal person to relaunch the strategy of a service that will reach hundreds of millions of devices and for which you have to work counterreloj. And now what? Rockwell will report to Craig Federight Aka ‘Pelazo’, Apple software head, while Paul Meade, who worked in hardware engineering for Vision Pro, will assume the direction of that department. Giannandrea will maintain other responsibilities in research of AI and robotics technologies, but without the focus on the day -to -day life of Apple Intelligence. In perspective. This movement underlines the difficulty that Apple is having to compete in AI without compromising its approach to privacy. Apple needs to balance innovation with its traditional perfectionism, something that is being especially complex in the field of generative AI. In fact, what was seen so far in Apple Intelligence (disastrous notificationsslow and mediocre results in image playground) It is from that perfectionism. Time will say if Rockwell’s experience in bringing complex products to the market will be enough to revitalize Siri and make Apple Intelligence become a competitive alternative to rivals such as ChatgPT or Google Gemini. But that is Apple’s new hope. It is that, or languish. In Xataka | The EU opens the iPhone by force: the European model will never be the same again Outstanding image | Apple

streaming has generated a Milmillionaire bleeding in Apple accounts

by

Since, a few months ago, Apple started taking Expenditure containment measures related to its audiovisual productions it was learned that the company not only had to abandon its project to become a Major that competed with Disney or Warner in its same terms. In addition, the expense generated by Apple TV+ was excessive. But today we have known that it goes far beyond what the most pessimistic calculations ventured: it loses one billion dollars a year. It is not another Netflix. Today, In an interview for Variety commemorating his 25 years at the head of Netflix, Ted Sarandos responded thus when asked about his impressions about Apple’s role in the streaming: “I don’t understand it beyond a marketing play, but they are very intelligent people. They may see something we don’t.” Saraonds’s words can be an order or not, but it is clear who carries the lead: in July, Bloomberg spoke Of the immediate cuts that Apple TV+ was going to start because it had less vision in a month than Netflix in one day. The abyss between both competitors is indisputable. One billion a month. The Information Publish a report that analyzes the financial statement of the platform after five years. It states that Apple TV+ loses more than one billion dollars a year. The specialized medium in Apple 9to5Mac Comment on the articlestating that although it had always been said that the platform was not profitable, it had never had such concrete and forceful figures associated with its losses. A lot of investment, few income. The explanation of these spectacular figures is at the high cost of Apple films in recent years. The very expensive ‘Napoleon‘by Ridley Scott and’The Moon Killer‘Martin Scorsese were the first, but the authentic financial bomb was’ argylle’, which raised around 35 million dollars And it cost 200. After that, to a commercial candy like ‘Wolfs‘, starring Brad Pitt and George Clooney, predicted a storm, and was released directly on the platform, with Apple assuming losses that perhaps they would have been greater carrying it to cinemas. The thrust of ‘separation’. The funny thing is that, at the image level, Apple TV+ goes through an excellent time. ‘Separation‘It has passed, with its long -awaited second season, of being a product of cult to reveal itself as one of the most unanimously acclaimed series of the moment. It is said that in the last month he could have reported two million users to the platform, which would be added to the 45 that The Information affirmed that he had at the end of 2024. And on the horizon, the return of ‘Ted Lasso‘. Apple is going well. However, these certainly disastrous numbers for the streaming They do not imply that the company does wrong. The last quarter, Apple closed the year with 124.3 billion dollars of incomeof which 36,300 could be considered benefits. Despite some obstacles, such as the fall in device sales in China, the business works perfectly for Apple; Even subscriptions, section where Apple TV+is, but also Apple Music, App Store, ICloud or Apple Care, paid great, growing 14% compared to the previous year. That is, bad news for Apple TV+, but they are certainly far from making the colossus staggered. Header | Apple In Xataka | Prime video is becoming an “aggregator” of other platforms. And the arrival of Apple TV+ is the last example

has launched a reprimand against Google and Apple for not complying with the DMA

by

“Companies operating in the EU, regardless of their place of constitution, must comply with the EU standards, including the Digital Markets Law (DMA),” has declared the Spanish commissioner Teresa Ribera in one of her first outstanding actions since she assumed the since Margrethe Vestager occupied before. His words do not arrive alone: ​​they are accompanied by a reprimand against Google and Apple, two giants who are in the sights for their relationship with the DMA. And he does it in a context marked by the Growing friction with the United States. Google’s case The European Commission, the executive arm of the block, has determined that certain functions of Google Search are designed to give preference to Alphabet’s own services on those of the competition. A movement that, according to Brussels, collides directly with the principles of transparency and non -discrimination of the DMA. On the other hand, he also pointed out that Google Play also does not comply with the aforementioned regulations, since it limits applications developers when “directing” users to external offers outside the store. This is what has determined, in a preliminary way, the European Commission in its investigation: Google Search: Google matrix treats Its own services, such as purchases, hotels, transport or financial or sports results, more favorable in Google search results than similar services offered by third parties. Here it is easy to imagine several scenarios. For example, if we seek ‘Apple Quote’ on Google, it is likely that the first result comes from Google Finance instead of other financial sources. The same goes for searches such as ‘Cheap flights to London’, where Google Travel usually appears before external alternatives. In the words of the commission: “Alphabet gives its own services a more prominent treatment compared to others by showing them at the top of Google search results or in dedicated spaces, with improved visual formats and filtering mechanisms.” Google Play. In the case of the official Android application store, European regulators accuse Google of Restrict the ability of developers to lead users to their own distribution channels and offers. In addition, they point out that, although the company can collect a rate for facilitating the collection of new customers through Google Play, the commissions that Alphabet applies exceed what they consider reasonable “Alphabet charges developers a high rate for an excessively long period of time for each purchase of digital goods and services,” says the commission. Apple’s case Brussels regulators They have pointed out that Apple must take measures to fulfill certain aspects of its interoperability obligation. As they explain, this will facilitate a more fluid integration of third -party products within the company’s ecosystem and allow users to access a greater variety of compatible devices and services. There are two key points in this issue. Let’s see what are: Connected devices. The commission has focused on the connectivity functions of iOS that allow to link devices such as smart watches, headphones and televisions. The required modifications seek to improve the user experience, allowing the visualization of notifications in wearables, the wireless transfer of files and more accessible configurations. “The connected devices of all brands will work better on the iPhone,” they say. Interoperability requests. The objective is that Apple facilitates access to developers who want to make the most of the interoperability capabilities of their ecosystem. For this, improvements are proposed as a more transparent access to technical documentation on functions, more agile communication and update and a more predictable period for requesting applications. As explained, “developers will benefit from a rapid and fair processing of their interoperability applications.” What’s still for Google and Apple In the case of Google, the company has the right to formally defend and respond to the conclusions of the European Commission. If preliminary opinions are confirmed, Brussels could formalize the breach of the DMA, which would mean fines of up to 10% of its global income. In case of recidivism, the sanction could double up to 20%. As for Apple, the company is obliged to apply the measures imposed by European regulators. However, these decisions respect their right of defense and remain subject to judicial scrutiny. Although, for now, the decision does not imply immediate sanctions, if the company refuses to comply, the commission could adopt additional measures under the DMA, which would eventually derive in fines. The effect in the United States This movement comes at a time when several technological leaders have raised their voice against the fines imposed in the EU. The protests have reached Donald Trump. Last year, the president -elect said in a podcast that Tim Cook called him to talk about the sanctions against Apple in Europe, to which he replied that he would not allow the EU to “take advantage” of US companies if he arrived again at the White House. After his electoral victory, his speech has not changed. Any future sanction to Apple or Google could generate a Negative reaction from Washington. Images | European Union (via Wikimedia Commons / CC by 4.0) | Solen Feyissa In Xataka | The EU regulatory obsession raises a world in which AI will have two speeds. And Europe will lose

The president of Mexico reveals how Apple told her about the attack

by

The president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum, confirmed Monday that her mobile phone and email, both for personal use, were hacked by unknown attackers. As explained at his morning conferencethe alert came from Apple, which notified the Government about the violation of its safety. The attack occurs just when its administration has intensified its offensive against drug cartels in a context of growing international pressure, including that of the United States. The notice that uncovered the hacking. “They hacked my phone and my email account. Apple immediately called the Digital Transformation Agency”Sheinbaum said this morning before journalists. The aforementioned agency, created this year to unify the technological capabilities of the government and under whose orbit is the General Directorate of Cybersecurity, was responsible for managing the situation from the first moment. According to the president, “he took letters in the matter very fast.” An attack with Pegasus? When the attackers point to high profile objectives, it is easy to think about Pegasus. However, it has not been revealed what tools were used to compromise the security of the telephone and mail of the president of Mexico. Apple has been fighting this type of spy software for some time, with Pegasus of NSO Group at the point of view, and has developed an alert system which notifies the possible affected through their Apple account, email and imissage. The head of state, however, has pointed out that it was Apple who contacted the digital transformation agency, which suggests a different communication than usual. To clarify it, we have consulted Apple about the existence of specific protocols when attacks aimed at high profile figures, such as heads of state. Nor is it clear if the cyber attack committed at the same time the mobile and email of Sheinbaum or if they were separate incidents. For now, the government continues to investigate. Personal use media. Both the telephone and the email affected by cyber attack were for personal use of the president of Mexico. As he explained, his mobile number dates from 2008, when he worked at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), and decided to keep it for attachment, although he almost did not use it. As collects group formulathis number had already leaked during the electoral campaign. “It was a (number of) phone that knew everyone” and that was published in a newspaper, said Sheinbaum on Monday. On her email account, the president explained: “I think it was the first account that I opened in Yahoo, so it is a very, very old address that a lot of people have. In addition, I have the government’s account, which does have all cybersecurity conditions and others. ” When consulted on possible measures, he affirmed that the government has security protocols in its official accounts and that, after the incident, now uses another personal phone number. A hacking after the delivery of drug traffickers. The hacking was known for the first time through Un article published by The New York Times last Friday. According to the medium, the attack occurred shortly after the Sheinbaum government completed the transfer of 29 drug traffickers to the United States and in a context of more aggressive measures against cartels, driven in the midst of the growing pressure of the Donald Trump administration. Images | Government of Mexico | Apple | Altumcode In Xataka | How to change all our passwords according to three cybersecurity experts

The true crown jewel in Apple is not its products, but its credibility. And they just torpedo her

by

In the summer of 2008 Apple made a great launch, one colossal and one that was one of the greatest disasters in its history. You probably remember the first two (the iPhone 3G and, above all, the App Store), but perhaps not what was that disaster. It is normal: they got us almost forgotten about that. That disaster was mobilemethe email platform that sought to compete with Exchange or with the Blackberry systems. However, its operation was An absolute disasterwith service drops and unexpected charges to user credit cards. So terrible was what David Pogue, an known editor of The New York Times, changed the name to Mobilemess (playing with “Mess”, “mess” in English “). Two years later Mobileme was kaput. It was something later when we knew how that disaster was managed internally. In 2011 Fortune published an article in which they precisely told how shortly after the launch, Steve Jobs called the Mobileme team to a meeting: “According to a participant in the meeting, Jobs entered dressed with his characteristic black neck jersey and blue jeans, gathered his hands and asked a simple question: “Can anyone tell me what Mobileme is supposed to do?” After receiving a satisfactory response, he continued: “And why don’t you do it?”. During the next half hour, Jobs rebuked the group. “You have stained Apple’s reputation,” he told them. “You should hate them for having disappointed you mutually.” Public humiliation especially enraged Jobs. Walt Mossberg, the influential gadget columnist from the Wall Street Journal, had criticized Mobileme. “Mossberg, our friend, doesn’t write good things about us anymore,” said Jobs. In the act, Jobs appointed a new executive to direct the group. “ History showed how for Jobs that ruling, now practically forgotten, had a capital importance. But that was the Apple before. Something smells in Apple John Gruber, well -known analyst and responsible for the Dary Fireball blog, I published this week A worrying analysis of Apple’s situation. It was titled “Something is rotten in the state of Cupertino”, and in it explained how different this Apple is now to which at that time managed Steve Jobs. This expert focused on what happened with Apple Intelligence in general and with the new version of Siri enhanced by the particular. In Apple they are clear followers in generativeand it does not seem that this will change in the short term. Apple Intelligence functions are limited and very modest, and while the greats of technology and various startups do not stop surprising us with new advances and increasingly striking functions, in Apple they continue with an approach that seemed interesting (very focused on privacy) but that is being disappointing in its exasperating deployment. But the really worrying thing is what happened with Siri. After the wwdc last year They announced that “Siri will be able to offer intelligence adapted to the user and the information of his device. For example, a user can say:” Play that podcast that Jamie recommended you, “and Siri will locate and reproduce the episode, without the user having to remember if he was mentioned in a text or in an email.” But both that and other promising options of Siri were only part of an empty speech, because There was never a public demonstration of those options. The only place where we could see it was in a pre -recorded demo “Not live,” in which Siri did all that Apple said he could do. As Gruber explained: “What Apple showed about the next” personalized Siri “in the WWDC was not a demo. It was a conceptual video. Conceptual videos are shit, and a sign of a company in disorder, if not in crisis.” Not only that: in September They returned To promote that future theoretical with an advertisement in which Siri understood the personal context – in what situation we were – to respond to a request. A few days ago Apple announced without more than that option it would not arrive until at least next year. Apple not only did not demonstrate in public these new Siri options, even in a preliminary version: the only thing we could see were conceptual videos about how the characteristic should work. And that announcement with Bella Ramsey – actress famous for her role in ‘The Last of Us’— has been withdrawn from YouTube this week without more. Are Too bad signsand all point to the same: to a fiasco. One worrying, because Apple did not do these things. He has rarely promised the launch of products and then back. It happened for example With the famous wireless load basebut this was a minor accessory. Siri’s dimension had, which is a theoretically crucial component for Apple to compete in the AI ​​field. And that leads us to ask what is happening in Apple. In the last 30 years the company has managed to build an enormously solid reputation and extraordinary credibility. People choose their products because they “simply work” – with many quotes -, and despite some more or less important slips –Hello, butterfly keyboardhello Throttling-, their products continue to stand out for their reliability. Apple’s credibility begins to make waters But that credibility staggers now and joins other signals that can be worrisome. We have been waiting for years for Apple to throw its new disruptive product, but They have never achieved it. It was not his Apple Watch – despite being a very popular product, such as the airpods – and of course They have not been the vision pro. Supposedly They canceled their ‘Project Titan’ And its intentions – just officers – to develop an ‘Apple Car’, but it is even more striking that the fact that two years have arrived since Chatgpt arrived and the most powerful company on the planet can only boast an assistant who Rewrite the emails or that generates cartoons. It is terrible. Source: Trendline. Apple’s situation also seems to be reflected in sales that remain colossal, but also They seem to have stagnated … Read more

Prime video is becoming an “aggregator” of other platforms. And the arrival of Apple TV+ is the last example

by

It has been since October in countries like the United States or the United Kingdom, but as of today, Apple TV+ will be available within the offer of prime video in other European countries, such as Spain, Germany and Italy. The fate of the Apple platform is still a peculiar symbol of how things are going to the business of streaming… and how Amazon is raised. Amazon friends. Like so many other channels of the Prime Video offer, to access the Apple TV+ programming, an extra (9.99 euros) that adds to the rate that the client already pays for Amazon Prime is added. The offer includes many of the most outstanding series of the Apple platform, such as’Separation‘,’ Silo ‘,’ The Morning Show ‘,’ Slow horses ‘,’Ted Lasso‘, movies like’Wolfs‘ either ‘The secret abyss‘And sporting events such as Major League Soccer and Major League Baseball. Another channel. Apple TV+ thus adds to The offer of prime video channelswhich has become a remarkable reponent of other people’s catalogs, almost forty, although all need the client to pay an additional rate. Among the most outstanding are some of cinema and series such as Crunchyroll, AMC+, MUBI, Lionsgate+or the exclusive Amazon MGM+. There are also sports such as Dazn Pro or Laligatv, although it undoubtedly attracts three platforms that we know for their activity outside Amazon: Max, Skyshowtime and, now, Apple TV+. Apple’s fluctuations. Leaving Skyshowtime aside, a recent platform and of which there are still no data on failures or successes, Max and Apple TV+ coincide in a trajectory of astronomical losses. Warner has spent years old submerged in radical cuts What have Affected to your premiere calendar Already the production of Max and HBO. Apple TV+, meanwhile, has had to end renouncing its purpose of becoming a Major from Hollywood after failures as notable as those of ‘Napoleon’ or, above all, ‘argylle’, as well as vision figures that They pale next to competitors Like Netflix. Time to grow. This last detail is especially relevant: despite the undisputed quality of its catalog, the penetration of Apple TV+ is incomparable to that of its rivals, and hence the treatment with Amazon: geting that series as ‘separation’ or ‘Ted Lasso’ look more is essential to continue producing callity content. Apple TV+ is not collected to give control over its products, something that has always gone against its business philosophy, but in this case it needs it. An previous agreement. It is not the first time that Amazon and Apple reach an agreement related to the content of Apple TV+, since its films were available for rent in Prime Video. What Amazon got in 2020 It was that Apple did not force the spectator to leave prime video and to enter its platform and make him pay 30% commission of the App Store. It was a favor treatment that had an unusual bridge between Apple and a rival company, and made Amazon Partner Apple privileged, undoubtedly taking a first step for the appearance of Apple TV+ as a prime video channel. The transformation of streaming. What is also clear is that the appearance of a channel as relevant as Apple TV+ in Prime Video, adding to Max and Skyshowtime, demonstrates not only Amazon’s financial muscle, which will have had to pay their own for that privilege, but also allows us to advance to a possible streaming panorama transformation. We will stop seeing in the future, perhaps, islets of exclusive content that do not communicate with each other, such as Netflix or Disney+, and we will see more platforms that intersect their catalogs, leaving in the viewer field the possibility of choosing one or another service according to offers, prices or temporary exclusive. Although in that sense, few can shade the splendid offer of Amazon channels. In Xataka | Prime Video has a plan to differentiate from its competition: become a repository of foreign channels

iOS 19 promises to be a total look change. It is actually something much more important for Apple

by

Apple prepares to execute the greatest redesign of its operating systems in a decade. As Mark Gurman filtered in Bloomberg, iOS 19 will involve a radical transformation of the iPhone interfacewith Changes in icons, menus, windows and system controls. A risky bet for a manufacturer whose income slowed down after boom pandemic and whose star product – the iPhone – has finally accumulated the feeling of Touch in income even with some fall. The interesting thing about this redesign is What tells us about Apple’s strategy. The cook company usually marks trend in interface designs, but now it is seen in a paradoxical situation: seeks inspiration in its less sold product, the Vision Pro. His mixed reality helmet does not seem unify the experience Among all Apple devices. It is a fine irony: the product that has the least users is the one to mark how we will interact with our devices the more than one billion iPhone users. This movement speaks of another important change in Apple’s product philosophy. For years it has maintained a clear distinction among its platforms, resisting the temptation to merge iOS and macOS as competitors have tried (Microsoft, Google). GIF: Apple. Now, without abandoning that functional separationApple seeks a visual coherence that makes the transition between devices more fluid. It is no accident that it occurs in a very marked context: Difficulty increasing income in the last two yearswhich translates into the need to stimulate the renewal of devices and consolidate its ecosystem The redesign also indicates a possible vulnerability in the current Apple position: the iPhone interface, once revolutionary, He has become familiar to the point of invisibility. Innovating in hardware is increasingly complicated when the product is mature – at the smartphone now happens to what at the time happened to the computer – so The perception of novelty must be created through software. If you cannot revolutionize physical experience, visually change it. It is a technological, but also psychological game: to make the known feel new. But without alienating a base of heterogeneous and massive users accustomed to certain interaction patterns. It is not the same to make changes in the Mac OS X of 2007 (for a niche of users, the majority enthusiasts) than in the IOS of 2025 (for people of all ages, technical levels and cultural contexts, from children to the elderly). The question is not whether Apple will technically implement these changes – it has talent and resources to do so and will do it – but If they will achieve the delicate balance between innovation and familiarity that defines the best product evolutions. As he taught us iOS 7 It makes twelve years, reinvent what works always entails risks. But maybe that is precisely the point: Apple needs to risk again. In Xataka | The decline of the “Apple culture”. Blind devotion has evolved towards critical enthusiasm Outstanding image | Apple

The director of an MCU classic and some modern horror successes signs the best premiere in the history of Apple TV+

by

We have spoken on more than one occasion of the Bandazos that has been giving Apple in his purpose of becoming a Major Hollywood. Great failures with high pretensions, such as ‘Napoleon’, ‘Argylle’ or ‘The Moon Killer’ have ended up making the company reduce their claims. Strategy that will be possible redoubled when they check that a much more effective film than all those but less ambitious, such as’The secret abyss‘(terrible Spanish title for’ The Gorge ‘) has beaten Records on the platform. Indeed, this film about a couple of confrontated sides snipers that have the mission of monitoring the two ends of a kilometer pit whose dangerous content is unaware It has been number 1 in 99 of the countries to which the Apple platform reachesand it is not difficult to understand why. The always powerful visual finish of Apple’s films (even those destined to go directly to streaming) It is perfect for a movie with star cast (Miles Teller, Anya Taylor-Joy and Sigourney Weaver), who join a director with their own vision. This is Scott Derrickson, who was associated with Marvel with ‘Doctor Strange’ and that signed some very interesting successful horror films, such as ‘The exorcism of Emily Rose’, ‘Sinister’, ‘Líbolos del Evil’ or ‘Black Phone’. To him is due to the turn of how sinister the film visually gives in its second half, a break that has been discussed by the flying with respect to the most suggestive start of this proposal. Because there, without a doubt, is where the best of this Apple production is: when the two protagonists get to know (dance to the sound of the ramones included) and how intimacy is emerging between them, something that is very well told and that ends up being the most memorable of the set, above the inevitable festival of fireworks of the second half. In any case, a sinister and action epic to which it is worth approaching to corroborate that it is not necessary not to look at the whole of Apple’s proposals. Header | Apple TV+ In Xataka | Back ‘separation’ to Apple TV+. His tortuous production for three years predicts bad times for author series

A 19 -year -old hacked the iPhone, was hired by Apple and ended up fired for not answering an email

by

The iPhone has been among us for almost 17 years. During all this time, the phone has changed a lot, but some things have remained practically intact since its launch. One of them is the closed ecosystem to which Apple products belong. Anti-Jailbreak. The Cupertino company has struggled to maintain a strong control over what can be done on the iPhone. But even in the first generation of the device there were those who rejected this mechanic and offered users an alternative: the Jailbreak. Jailbreak was nothing other than a method that was used of certain vulnerabilities of the device to remove the restrictions that Apple had imposed. Thus, those who resorted to this method accessed unpaid functions in exchange for putting their safety at risk. The road from Allegra. From advanced adjustments to the possibility of installing third -party applications without going through the App Store (store that was not available at the beginning and arrived in 2008 with OS 2). One of the hackers that had developed his own jailbreak was Nicholas Allegra. The 18 -year -old known on the network as “Comex” launched the first jailbreak publicly available for the iPhone 4 In 2010. To achieve this, he found a way to exploit vulnerability in a Safari library, so his method worked directly from the browser. Advanceing. Comex continued to cultivate his ability to break Apple’s telephone security and the following year launched Jailbreakme 3.0, which reached several iOS devices, including iPad 2. At this point, the community believed that Allegra was “years ahead” of other iOS hackers. And hired. But in 2011, his reality changed radically. The young man He went from creating Jailbreakme to be part of Applethe company that had challenged, as “remote fellow.” It is not clear what the dynamic between the multinational and the young man was, but that link did not take too long to dissolve. The farewell. After almost a year in Apple, in 2012 Allegra He announced on Twitter that was no longer part of Apple. In another message he explained that he had reached that situation because he had “forgotten to answer an email.” The mail in question was an offer to continue hired. The internship had a duration of one year and, apparently, Apple asked Comex by email to confirm if it would continue in the company for one more year. Not receiving an answer, the firm left the iphone hacker contract without effect, so it ceased to be a fellow. Images | Unspash In Xataka | Banks spent years criticizing cryptocurrencies. The BBVA will soon allow to operate with Bitcoin and ETH from its app In Xataka | Japan’s demographic crisis is leaving him without workers. Your solution: thousands of robots with a cat’s face *An earlier version of this article was published in January 2024

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.