ideal for gifting if you are on a tight budget

Although it is officially celebrated on the last Friday of the month, many stores follow the same pattern. Black Friday activated. As we now have it easier to find good deals, there are many people who take advantage and advance their purchases for Christmas. There is a lot to give away in certain cases and, if we can do it at the best price, the better. But leaving aside the offers, there is another way to save when it comes to giving: bet on reconditioned. and there Back Market You have a lot to choose from. They are devices with a 24-month warranty and a very good price. Now that giving away technology is so fashionable, reconditioned ones are presented as a very interesting option if we want to opt for a good device while spending much less. This is something that It is much more evident if we look at brands like Applewhere it is much more difficult to find your best phones, tablets or laptops with a big discount. Back Market has a gigantic catalog of these reconditioned ones, but that’s really not the only incentive to buy there. This store guarantees that all its devices are inspected and reconditioned by expertsalways ensuring that we will meet Factory restored products in very good condition. For our added peace of mind, the devices we buy at Back Market have a 30-day trial period in which we can see what the device offers and, if we are not convinced, return it completely free of charge. In addition, we will also have 24 months warrantyso we will be well covered for a long season. Some examples of reconditioned ones to give as gifts As we say, this store has a gigantic catalog of devices in which it is not difficult to find what we are looking for (either for ourselves or to give a gift). Just below we leave you three very interesting devices right now in terms of quality-price. iPhone 15 If there are some devices that age well, they are Apple’s. Going for an iPhone from a couple of generations ago can be great for us to continue within the Apple ecosystem without spending everything the new iPhones are worth. In that situation, this iPhone 15 reconditioned is presented as a very good alternative: we have it available for 499 euros. It is a model that is ideal for anyone who prefers compact mobile phones, since its screen is 6.1 inches. Although it is already two years old, it still offers a very good experience thanks to the A16 Bionic chip. In addition, its camera system is balanced and will allow us to take good images in practically any scenario. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links iPad Air 5 What if we look for a tablet? Here we can apply exactly what we have discussed a little above about Apple and its iPhone. The Californian company’s tablets also age quite well and are a great option for almost anything: whether it’s working, studying, or even watching a movie on the couch. If you are looking for one of these, look out for this one iPad Air 5: we have it available for 316 euros. It is a light and very manageable device, ideal to take with us everywhere. In terms of autonomy and performance, it is more than enough despite having a few years behind it. Its 10.9-inch screen is one of its strongest points, since it has great image quality and detail. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Galaxy S23+ We leave Apple with an example of all the Android devices in the Back Market. On this occasion, we are referring to the Galaxy S23+a high-end device from Samsung that, despite also having a couple of generations, is presented as a great quality-price option with the price it has in this store: it costs 339 euros. This device, the intermediate model of the S line from two years ago, comes with a 6.6-inch Dynamic AMOLED screen with 120 Hz. It has a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor, which at this point continues to perform at a high level. Its triple camera system complies with note, it has a 4,700 mAh battery and it came with four years of guaranteed updates, so you will still receive one more version of Android. The price could vary. We earn commission from these links Some of the links in this article are affiliated and may provide a benefit to Xataka. In case of non-availability, offers may vary. Images | Xataka, Apple, Samsung In Xataka | The best mobile phones, we have tested them and here are their analyzes In Xataka | Best tablets in quality price. Which one to buy based on use and recommended models

Someone at Harvard suggested that 3I/ATLAS was an alien ship. A new test has revealed to us what it really is

Without a doubt one of the space objects that has been causing the most sensation in recent months is 3I/ATLAS. Practically everything has been said in recent months, from the fact that it is a simple asteroid that was going to destroy our planet to the fact that it was an alien shipas noted a professor from the prestigious Harvard. But all these ideas have been left in nothing thanks to the last signal that has been interpreted from this object. What he imagined. Interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, the third such visitor ever detected, has kept the scientific community (and science fiction fans) in suspense since its discovery in July. The most “far-fetched” speculations, as experts have described them, went so far as to suggest that it could be an extraterrestrial spacecraft, especially when it temporarily disappeared behind the Sun. The sign that explains everything. On October 24, the radio telescope MeerKAT In South Africa, a powerful network of 64 antennas captured the key evidence. This was neither an encrypted message nor a technological transmission from another species, but rather an absorption radio signal caused by hydroxyl molecules. What does it mean. Hydroxyl molecules are the direct result of the ‘breaking’ of a water molecule. This is something that happens when the ice in the nucleus of a comet approaches the Sun and sublimates due to the large amount of energy it absorbs. That is, it automatically goes from solid to gas and this is what we have detected from Earth, as has explained Michael Küppers, scientist at the European Space Agency (ESA). In summary, we are talking about 3I/ATLAS containing ice inside, as happens in comets (and not in extraterrestrial spacecraft). And we are completely sure of this, since these absorption signals are like the molecular DNI, it is unique for each compound. Goodbye speculation. As we have mentioned before, the alien ship theory gained traction when the object hid behind the Sun. Some speculated that it was maneuvering or hiding from our radars. However, on November 4, 3I/ATLAS reappeared exactly where orbital calculations predicted it would be. There were no maneuvers, just physics. Furthermore, it is not the first time it has been detected. Javier Peralta, an expert in planetary atmospheres, recalls that NASA’s Swift space telescope had already observed hydroxyl in the ultraviolet spectrum. MeerKAT’s new detection is crucial because it confirms the same composition in a completely different band of the electromagnetic spectrum: radio. What does the future hold for us? 3I/ATLAS is the third known interstellar visitor, after 1I/’Oumuamua in 2017 and 2I/Borisov in 2019. Although its trajectory is too long and it has traveled too long to know which star it comes from. But the important thing is that we are already preparing for what is coming. ESA’s JUICE mission, currently en route to Jupiter, will take new radio measurements from 3I/ATLAS in February 2026. But the big bet is the mission ESA Comet Interceptorwhich will be launched around 2029 and will wait for the next large comet to approach our planet. Cover | POT In Xataka | NASA ignores the Harvard study on an alleged extraterrestrial spacecraft: “it is an interstellar comet”

What is it, what changes from now on and what advantages and disadvantages does it have?

We are going to explain to you in a simple way How the Ryanair Digital Boarding Pass workswith which now you have the obligation install the company’s app if you want to get on the plane. It is a rule that has already been in operation since November 12, 2025, despite the controversies surrounding its imposition. This move by the airline may cause a bit of confusion, and that is why we are going to try to explain what happens from now on and what changes you may begin to notice. What is the Digital Boarding Pass The Digital Boarding Pass is the document that allows you to pass security control and board your plane. It is that document with a QR that you can print or take as a PDF on your mobile, and that is scanned when you pass the security check or board. Basically, with this Digital Boarding Pass what airlines achieve is not having to verify all the information on your boarding pass. They simply scan your QR and they will know that it is valid, and they will only have to check your ID to see that you are who you say you are. Airlines give you this Digital Boarding Pass when you check in digitally, and it shows your flight number and your seat. The normal thing is that it is always given to you, along with options such as downloading it in PDF or sending it to an email. Thus, you can choose between printing it or carrying it on your mobile. What Ryanair asks for from now on When you check in online on its website or in its mobile application, Ryanair already issued you the Digital Boarding Pass along with a PDF. What changes now is that a PDF will no longer be generated that you can print and take with you. Instead, the Digital Boarding Pass will remain within your user account in the mobile application. The only change is that you will no longer have that PDF, and You will no longer be able to carry anything printed from home. You will have to depend on your mobile phone and the official Ryanair application. Therefore, from now on You will need to have the Ryanair app installed on your mobile phone to be able to carry the Digital Boarding Pass on it. This card will be available without a mobile data connection, so you can access the plane even if you don’t have data. Download the app and what else it offers In addition to carrying your boarding pass, the Ryanair app also allows you to make or personalize travel reservations. From cars to hotels. In addition, it also offers you information about your flightsuch as the terminal to go to, boarding and departure time, or information on possible delays or changes in time. In addition to this, The application also works for you inside the plane in case you want to order something from the menu or make some questions. The idea is to make it easier for you to do any procedure. You can download the app on your mobile completely free of charge. Is available on Google Play for Android, and in the App Store of your iPhone. Once inside, you will have to log in with the same data that you use on the Ryanair website to book the flight and check in online. Advantages and disadvantages The disadvantage is that now you have fewer options when carrying your boarding pass, and Ryanair wants you to depend solely on its application, that you always have it installed with you. Although this is not entirely the case either. In Xataka Mobile Ryanair has been asked if we can continue using the boarding pass in apps like Google Wallet or Apple Wallet, and the company has responded yes. They also say that you will still be able to carry a screenshot of the Digital Boarding Pass. Come on, they have simply deleted the PDF. At the airport check-in counter they will provide you with a printed version of the boarding pass, even if you lose your phone between security control and the boarding gate. Therefore, if you do not want to install the app you can always go to this counter and request that it be generated for you at no cost alleging some problem like you’ve run out of battery or you don’t have a cell phone, although this will be less convenient than simply carrying the app. In Xataka Basics | How to find cheap flights with Google Flights

Participate in our giveaway on Twitch and win a Midea PortaSlipt

There is nothing left for the Xataka NordVPN Awards 2025! In a little week we will meet at the Capitol Cinemas in Madrid to discover the best technological products of the year, so we are waiting for you! As the day arrives, we continue to whet our appetite with the third and final edition of Xataka Live, this time from the hand of Midea. And be careful, a big draw is coming. And in today’s program we will raffle a Midea PortaSplita most peculiar device. Imagine that you combine a Split with a penguin, but you remove all the disadvantages (fixed installation, noise) and keep all the advantages (quiet, portability, efficient). That is, roughly speaking, a PortaSplitand a lucky xatakero or xatakera will be able to take it home completely free. As? Participating in the draw that will take place during today’s Xataka Live, November 12 at 4:00 p.m., on our Twitch channel. We’ll tell you everything right away. How to win a PortaSplit Split holder | Midea Following today’s Xataka Live can have a prize: a Midea PortaSlit. It is an ideal domestic air conditioning device for apartments where it is not possible to carry out a complete installation or rooms without air conditioning. Installation is very simple, to the point that you can do it yourself. It is a really interesting product. To participate in the draw you just need to watch today’s broadcast and stay tuned, since at some point we will ask a question. The first ten people to answer correctly will be assigned a number from one to ten and will advance to the second round. In this one, our presenters will draw a random number from a bag. The participation corresponding to that number will win the prize. One winner and two substitutes will be selected. If the winner, that is, whoever responded the fastest, does not meet the requirements, the first substitute will be moved on. If this one does not comply either, the second one will be resorted to. The winner will be chosen live and must contact Xataka through a whisper in the Twitch chat. In addition, the winner must be over 18 years old and resident in Spain. You still have time to get your tickets for the gala Xataka NordVPN Awards 2025 on November 20 in Madrid! Join us and discover the best technological products of the year in a free event full of gadgets, humor and surprises. Advice offered by the brand The legal bases can be consulted at this link. Below, we summarize the dynamics: During today’s program (November 13, 16:00-17:00), we will ask a question. The first ten people who answer correctly in the chat will be assigned a number and will advance to the second round. The presenters will blindly draw a number from a bag. The participation corresponding to that number will win the prize, in this case a Midea Portasplit. In addition, two more numbers will be drawn corresponding to the two substitutes. The requirements to participate are to be of legal age (18 years) and resident in Spain. If the winner does not meet the requirements, the first alternate will be moved; If he does not comply either, the second substitute will be used. This content is a sponsored collaboration between Xataka and the brand, without agreements on the script or selection of topics. The editorial content is prepared entirely by Xataka. Image | Xataka In Xataka | Xataka NordVPN 2025 Awards: reserve November 20 for the great annual technology festival

OpenAI is going to have to pay a fortune in credit obligations in 2026. Today the accounts do not work out

In recent months, OpenAI has signed agreements worth more than $1.4 trillion in infrastructure—data centers—that will be built in the next 8-10 years. The problem is that to do this they will have to face gigantic credit obligations that will require billions of dollars in 2026, and it is not at all clear how they will be able to face those payments. bad business. Your current income structure certainly does not support such debt. Sam Altman indicated in X They expect to end the year with more than $20 billion in annualized revenue. Even so, they will continue to be in (very) red numbers, although they also promise that by 2030 they will enter “hundreds of billions of dollars“The accounts do not come out, and that makes it virtually impossible to meet all credit commitments without resorting to extraordinary forms of financing, refinancing or… Rescue. Last week there was already talk about how both NVIDIA and OpenAI had dropped the possibility that papa state had to rescue them in case of a debacle. Sam Altman himself clarified shortly after that “we don’t have or want government guarantees (…) and taxpayers should not bail out companies that make bad business decisions.” He does not want a rescue, but he does talk about agreements with the government. Although Altman clarified that he was not seeking government bailouts, he did make it clear that there is a debate about a strategy to face these loans: “The only area in which we have discussed loan guarantees is in the framework of supporting the construction of semiconductor factories in the United States (…) Of course, this is different from governments guaranteeing the construction of data centers for private purposes.” It seems impossible for them to get out of this. As analyst Ed Zitron explains in your newsletterOpenAI needs $400 billion over the next 12 months to meet those credit obligations. Not only that: for him OpenAI’s plans to build chips with Broadcom and fill a 1 GW data center or create similar data centers with AMD chips Instinct or with the Vera Rubin from NVIDIA “There is not enough time to build these data centers. And if there was enough time, there would not be enough money. And if there was enough money, there would not be enough (electrical) transformers, electrical grade steel or specialized talent to supply the electricity for these data centers.” That’s all a gigantic house of cards. Possible strategies. OpenAI increasingly depends on debt issues and strategic investors, but also on those circular financing agreements it has reached with several companies. SoftBank, which already invested in OpenAI, could expand its bet, especially now that it has just sold completely all its participation in NVIDIA. Although the sale has obtained almost $6 billion, the figure is still insufficient even if it is invested in OpenAI. And of course OpenAI could achieve explosive revenue growth, but it is far from clear that it will achieve such growth in the short term. The other solution: slow down. OpenAI’s excessive ambition makes everything surrounding its agreements and proposals absolutely enormous, and that also affects its credit obligations. Adopting a slightly less risky strategy and setting more feasible deadlines could reduce the financial stress to which the company is subject… but it would also raise doubts about the growth promises that Altman and his people have made for years. Going public? Another option for OpenAI is to go public now that it has managed to complete the restructuring and has become in a for-profit organization under the umbrella, of course, of the OpenAI Foundation. In recent days there was talk about how this option would allow the company get a billion dollar valuationbut the analysts they doubt that something like this is going to happen in the short term… if it happens at all. And the bubble keeps growing. Analysts like Scott Galloway they explained recently that the valuations of companies like NVIDIA, Oracle or AMD are conditional on those “handshake” agreements with other companies like OpenAI. For him, these agreements have no substance: there is much ado about nothing. If the market ends up losing confidence, the consequences could be dire and the hypothetical bubble could burst. Source: Apollo Academy All eggs in one basket. Stock market concentration does not help. Torsten Sloj, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, has been talking for some time about the dangerous concentration of the S&P 500 index in 2025. A few days ago published a graph in which it showed the returns of various assets in the last five years, and there is a clear conclusion: while “the Magnificent Seven” have grown exceptionally, the rest have barely done so. Image | Steve Juvetson In Xataka | There is a race in which Anthropic is winning over OpenAI: that of being profitable

War is already the dystopia that George Miller imagined

In recent weeks, the Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk has become the new epicenter of wear harshest military of the war. What began as a key logistics and supply point for kyiv’s forces in Donbas has been transformed in a trap where the Ukrainian army struggles to maintain a viable defense against the constant push of Russian troops. The last scene shown on video brings us closer to a dystopia than ever. On the verge of collapse. In early November, former officers and civilian figures such as Vitaliy Deynega, founder of the organization Come Back Alivethey warned that the situation “is more than complicated and less than controlled,” asking for withdrawal before the city was completely surrounded. The reality on the ground reflected that urgency: the Ukrainian defensive lines were increasingly thinnerwith a force of only four to seven infantry per kilometer of front, while Russia continued to fuel its offensive with a constant flow of men and material. The Ukrainian brigades, exhausted and diminished, faced a dilemma that summarizes the current phase of the conflict: either resist to preserve the narrative of firmness, or withdraw to save lives in the face of an enemy with numerical superiority and the capacity to replenish. The weight of scarcity and exhaustion. I remembered the financial times that the battle for Pokrovsk has highlighted a problem that kyiv has tried to avoid publicly acknowledging: its military personnel deficit. Desertions are increasing, new recruits are scarce, and many men are avoiding mobilization. Only in October they opened almost 20,000 cases for unauthorized absences or abandonment of units, the highest number of the year. This collapse in replenishment has led to many positions being held by drone units and volunteers, rather than by conventional infantry force. Military analyst Konrad Muzyka describe the situation as a “real decrease in the size of the ground forces”, with sectors of the front practically monitored only by drones. More money. President Zelenskyy has attempted to reverse this trend by short contractsamnesties for deserters and incentivized recruitments, but the results have not yet arrived. Meanwhile, Russian forces They have taken advantage of the gap– Your assault squads, reinforced with well-paid volunteers, infiltrate destroyed urban areas, occupying tall buildings and cutting off supply corridors connecting Pokrovsk to Myrnohrad. Each Ukrainian withdrawal movement seems like a repetition of other fallen cities: Bakhmut, Avdiivka, Vuhledar. Russian improvised vehicles in Ukraine The Russian dystopian emergence. In this context of exhaustion, Russia has intensified its offensive in both Pokrovsk and Kupiansk, applying pincer tactics to isolate key urban centers and secure the railway axes that feed its military logistics. The statements of the Russian Ministry of Defense announce partial conquests (oil depots, train stations, industrial neighborhoods), while propaganda channels broadcast videos showing Russian columns advancing in the middle of the fog on roads covered in rubble. The imagesgeolocated south of Pokrovsk, portray a almost apocalyptic scenario: motorcycles and trucks without doors, soldiers perched on the roofs and a dense silence interrupted only by the drone of drones. This trailer, which is reminiscent of scenes almost traced from the Mad Max sagasymbolizes the harshness of the war of attrition in eastern Ukraine. Extra ball. In that sense, the fog has played a crucial tactical rolereducing the effectiveness of Ukrainian air surveillance and allowing Russian units to penetrate the southern suburbs. For Moscow, Pokrovsk represents more than a territorial conquest: it is the step towards Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, the strategic jewels of industrial Donbas. Symbol of resistance. Despite the Russian advance, the Ukrainian army continues to resist inside the city, where it is estimated that they remain more than 300 enemy soldiers. Local units, such as the 7th Rapid Response Corps, have communicated who continue to identify and neutralize Russian groups in urban combat and keep the supply to Myrnohrad operational, although with increasing difficulties. However, the tension between the official narrative and the reality on the ground is palpable: while Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi affirms that the situation “is under control,” independent civilian and military reports describe an increasingly tight siege. The human limit. Many analysts agree with one idea: the decision to maintain the position at all costs could have psychological consequences devastating if the retreat turns into a chaotic defeat under fire, repeating the Bakhmut patterns. With exhausted forces and a militarized population resisting new calls, Pokrovsk embodies the physical and moral border of the Ukrainian war effort. If it falls, it will open not only a military corridor to the heart of Donbas, but also a new chapter in the war: that of a country forced to redraw its strategy with fewer men, more machines and a determination tested like never before. Image | YouTube In Xataka | Europe has just realized the size of the drone threat: they have gone where no one could imagine In Xataka | The Ukrainian war is really being fought in the future: Russian soldiers already have “invisibility” cloaks

Meta’s star AI scientist plans to leave the company, according to the FT. The new goal is eating the old goal.

The head of artificial intelligence at Meta, Yann LeCun, would be preparing to leave the company to found his own startup, according to inform Financial Times. The departure of the prestigious researcher, winner of the Turing Award and considered one of the fathers of modern AI, symbolizes the radical change that Mark Zuckerberg is giving to Meta’s strategy around AI. The changing of the guard. LeCun, who led the Fundamental AI Research Laboratory (FAIR) since 2013, is now in an uncomfortable position within Meta. This summer, Zuckerberg hired Alexander Wang28, to lead a new “superintelligence” team, paying $14.3 billion to take 49% of Scale AI, the data labeling startup Wang had founded. As a result of this restructuring, LeCun went from reporting to chief product officer Chris Cox to reporting to Wang, according to account Financial Times. A philosophical divorce. The tension is not only organizational, but conceptual. LeCun has long publicly defended that the language models on which Zuckerberg has focused his strategy are “useful” but will never be able to reason or plan like humans. His bet from FAIR has been different: the so-called “world models”AI systems that learn from the physical environment through videos and spatial data, not just language. A path that, according to LeCun himself, could take a decade to bear fruit. Meta’s problems with AI. Zuckerberg’s reorganization comes after several setbacks. The launch of Call 4 It has not gone as the company would have liked, falling below the most advanced proposals from OpenAI, Google and Anthropic. Additionally, Meta AI, the company’s chatbot, has also not gained traction among users. Meanwhile, Zuckerberg has hired dozens of engineers and competing researchers with pay packages of up to $100 million, creating a dedicated team called TBD Lab to accelerate the development of new versions of its language models. The cost of pivoting. The shift toward practical AI appears to have generated internal chaos. Sources cited by TechCrunch In August they revealed the frustration of new hires when facing the bureaucracy of a large company, while the previous generative AI team saw its scope reduced. In October, Meta laid off 600 people of its AI research unit to cut costs and accelerate product launches. Also in May Joelle Pineau left the companyvice president of AI research, who joined Canadian startup Cohere. What’s coming now. According to two sources Cited by the Financial Times, LeCun’s new project will focus on continuing his work on world models, and he has already started talks to raise funding. His departure, scheduled for the coming months, represents more than the departure of a brilliant scientist: it is confirmation that Meta’s old long-term focus has been relegated by the urgency of competing in the short term with more practical solutions. As Wall Street pressures Zuckerberg to justify an investment in AI that could exceed $100 billion In 2025, the company would be losing one of its most recognized brains along the way. Cover image | Goal and AFP In Xataka | AI was supposed to reduce costs and reduce staff. The Coca-Cola ad illustrates how much we were wrong

to what extent will we accept that AI cameras fine us

Spain has begun to automate the surveillance of minor infractions with AI: Technology stops optimizing traffic and starts monitoring it. Why is it important. This marks a paradigm shift. Until now, urban AI was used to improve mobility (adjust traffic lights, predict traffic jams, reduce emissions). Now he goes from assistant to inspector. And it does so with a key nuance: it does not pursue major crimes or flagrant dangers, but rather small daily infractions that previously escaped control due to cost and surveillance capacity. AI reduces the marginal cost of sanctioning to practically zero. Once deployed, everyone can be observed all the time. The facts. The Barcelona pilot test involved four buses of lines H12 and D20 equipped with cameras that identify, through AI, vehicles blocking reserved lanes. In Madrid, the City Council has installed smart traffic lights that count pedestrians in real time and has announced systems that will detect seat belt use. The DGT has taken another step. It has deployed four cameras on the A-1, A-2, A-6 and A-42 highways that monitor the crossing of continuous lines. The system works with two cameras per section: one records the license plates at the beginning, another at the end. If a car changes lanes between both points, the fine is automatic. It is 200 euros per violation. In figures. Spain already has 3,395 devices to control violationsaccording to Faconauto. Of them, more than 1,300 are DGT surveillance points between fixed and mobile radars. Added to this are more than 200 cameras that monitor belts and mobile phones, Pegasus helicopters and now these new continuous line detection systems. Barcelona has not yet activated the sanctions on its buses, but the volume of violations detected (80 daily in just four vehicles) anticipates what is coming. Between the lines. There is a delicate balance that is being renegotiated without us having barely opened the debate. On the one hand, more compliance with fewer agents: administrative efficiency is indisputable. On the other, the sensation of an omnipresent eye. The difference with the classic radar is not so much technical as range. The radar monitors specific points where there is proven risk. These new systems turn the entire city into a guarded zone: each bus is an inspector, each intersection a control point. AI does not change what is sanctioned, it changes where and how much. Move from selective surveillance to ubiquitous surveillance. Yes, but. To what extent will citizens accept being recorded and punished by a machine? It’s not just a legal issue, but a cultural one: trust in the algorithm versus human interpretation. Who audits the system’s decisions? What room is there for error or appeal? Technology is not neutral: each deployment reflects political priorities about what deserves to be monitored and sanctioned. The big question. What is relevant is not whether this is good or bad in the abstract, but what it tells us about the new contract between citizen, city and AI. AI stops being an abstraction and enters the daily urban experience. The citizen goes from user to observed subject. And the unresolved question is who sees, who decides, who corrects and, above all, how far we are willing to go when automating the chase is so easy and cheap. In Xataka | The “made in China” business of the DGT’s V-16 beacons: homologating the same product 24 times and selling it under different brands Featured image | Barcelona City Council

Gibraltar airport was born as a British military bastion. Now Spain has imposed a veto that will be very expensive

Since its construction during the Second World War on the narrow strip that separates the Rock from the isthmus, the Gibraltar airport It has been much more than a landing strip: an RAF military enclave, a nerve center for British logistics in the Mediterranean and, at the same time, a constant source of diplomatic friction with Spain. Today, and after Brexit, that old tension resurfaces in new forms. More restrictions. The United Kingdom has confirmed that the restrictions imposed by Spain on the overflight of British military aircraft remain in force, affecting flights arriving or departing from the Royal Air Force (RAF) air base in Gibraltar. Despite this, the British Ministry of Defense insists that the measure has no operational impact and that the base continues to operate as a sovereign military airfield under full authority of the United Kingdom. So he reiterated it Under Secretary of State for the Armed Forces, Alistair Carns, in response to a series of parliamentary questions posed by Liberal Democrat MP Helen Maguire, who asked for clarification on the logistical and financial consequences of this situation. Carns claimed that RAF aircraft simply They trace alternative routes to avoid Spanish territorial airspace, in accordance with the restrictions imposed by Madrid, and that Gibraltar’s operational capacity has not been compromised. The big doubt. Nevertheless, admitted that no formal study has been carried out on the economic costs derived from diverting flights through other international air information regions, despite the increase in fuel costs and flight time that this implies. The dimension of the blockade. The debate about the military overflights reflects a historical conflict between London and Madrid that has survived all diplomatic stages, from the Cold War to Brexit. Spain, relying on international law and its claim of sovereignty over Gibraltar, maintains that all British military activity in the area must comply with its air traffic rules. For the Spanish Government, overflight restrictions are not a sanction, but a legitimate expression of its jurisdiction over the airspace it considers its own. An RAF Hawk at the airport What do the English say? From the British perspective, however, these limitations are a inheritance of tensions that surround the sovereignty of the Rock and a technical rather than political obstacle. In the Westminster Parliament, the issue continues to be a recurring theme, periodically reactivated by particularly combative deputies who see every Spanish gesture as a threat to the British integrity of the enclave. To them, successive governments of the United Kingdom have always responded in the same way: reaffirming their full sovereignty over Gibraltar and the right of its inhabitants to self-determination, without opening any loophole for territorial negotiations with Spain. A Lockheed Hudson of No. 233 Squadron RAF lands at Gibraltar in August 1942 Gibraltar after Brexit. Brexit introduced a new framework of relations that fully affected Gibraltar’s position. After months of negotiationSpain, the United Kingdom and the European Commission reached an agreement that established a joint system customs and border control. Under this pact, Spain will assume controls on the European side at the Peñón port and airport, which will allow more fluid transit to destinations within the European Union. However, the military issue was left out of those understandings. The Liberal Democrat Helen Maguire brought this sensitive point back to the table by asking whether the impact of restrictions Spanish reports on the operations and costs of the British Ministry of Defence. Carns’ response was blunt: air limitations continue, aircraft avoid Spanish space and the base maintains its sovereign status. But, as we said before, the absence of an official calculation on additional spending reflects political will to publicly minimize any consequences derived from the dispute, preserving the narrative of autonomy and absolute control over Gibraltar. Strategic impact. Although London maintains that the Spanish veto does not interfere In its operational freedom, the diversion of military routes involves a considerable logistical effort. Instead of crossing the Iberian Peninsula, aircraft must border it by the Atlanticprolonging the journeys from the British Isles to Gibraltar and complicating supply at a point of strategic value for British operations in the Mediterranean and North Africa. The RAF base in Gibraltar, next to the port used by the Royal Navy, constitutes an essential axis for surveillance, supply and military transit missions to Africa and the Middle East. The United Kingdom has not revealed figures on the economic impact of the diversions, but parliamentary sources acknowledge that fuel and planning costs are inevitable, especially in rapid deployment exercises or emergencies. Even so, the Ministry of Defense avoid recognizing officially these damages, aware that admitting them would imply granting Spain a political advantage in a matter where each diplomatic gesture has symbolic weight. A geopolitical symbol. If you also want, the conflict over Gibraltar’s airspace condenses centuries of friction between both nations and is projected as a microdemonstration of the balance of power in the Mediterranean. A pesar de los acuerdos pos-Brexit y de la cooperación en materia fronteriza y económica, la defensa del Peñón continúa siendo un terreno de maximum political sensitivity. The RAF base and the port of Gibraltar are more than simple military infrastructure: they represent the last vestige of British projection in southern Europe, a symbolic platform of sovereignty in disputed territory. The Spanish restrictions They do not prevent the operation of that presence, but they require a constant effort of logistical adaptation and a careful diplomatic balance. In this context, the United Kingdom maintains its usual line: denying any operational impact and reaffirming that Gibraltar continues to be, both in the air and on land, an unbreakable piece of its strategic identity. Image | Dicklyon, Harry Mitchell In Xataka | The Strait of Gibraltar was very different eight million years ago. So different that there were two In Xataka | In World War II, Hitler gave Spain the keys to Gibraltar. He did not have what Franco demanded in return

the company is drowning in the market that it itself created

The first time I ordered food at home, it was from Telepizza. It’s possible that you do too. In the nineties, Telepizza was the perfect plan for hangouts to watch football or a movie at home. They had no competition. Today yes, and a lot. This, together with decades of treating the company as a financial asset and not as a long-term business, has caused the current situation: the company’s accounts are bleeding and there are serious doubts about its viability. Debt, restructuring and losses According to one PricewaterhouseCooper audit published in Merca2in 2024 Telepizza lost more than 48 million euros and carries a total debt of 150 million euros. The expected turnover for this period was 300 million euros, but they achieved 249.9 million, 18% less. This is in addition to expenses that amounted to 18.6 million euros in 2024 alone. Spain continues to be its strongest market and accounts for 60% of all its income, but also where the loss is greatest (almost 25 million euros). According to PwC, there are “material uncertainty regarding the continuity of the business”, and it is not the first time they have warned of something like this. They did another audit of the company’s accounts in 2022 in which they showed “significant doubts about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.” Telepizza is at a crossroads: it needs to generate income quickly to cover expenses and debt, but at the same time it needs to invest if it wants to become competitive again in the current landscape. The accounts don’t work out. Telepizza and the delivery boom The food delivery landscape has radically transformed. Telepizza no longer competes in the market it founded, but in a totally saturated ecosystem where there are more and often better options. According to Dashmote data in 2024between 2019 and 2022 the delivery market in Spain doubled its income, reaching 5,000 million euros and in 2023 it would grow to 6.6 billion. Not all the mountain is oregano, the main delivery operators They also cannot boast of stability and profitsbut for Telepizza the reality is that, where they once reigned, now There are hundreds of thousands of restaurants available. It also happens that pizza is no longer the favorite option to order at home. According to DBK dataIn 2024, hamburger restaurants accounted for 61% of the market. Fried chicken restaurants and “other concepts” also grew, while pizzerias decreased their turnover by 1.8%. There is also the problem that entering this model implies give a third of income in commissionssomething that does not suit Telepizza very well in its delicate situation. Given this panorama, Telepizza has opted to encourage orders through its app and website. Recently They celebrated a pyrrhic victory: They are the pizza brand with the most users through their website and appreaching a total of 1.8 million monthly users. The problem is that the figure is not even striking. To put it in context, Burger King and McDonald’s have 4.7 and 4.5 million users through their apps respectively. Telepizza’s strategy involves reinforcing its own channel and betting on loyal customers who already know them and return to their app, but at the same time has become practically invisible for the rest of the public, who have many more pizzerias to choose from through the apps. It is an isolation strategy. The final chapter of a series that began decades ago To understand how Telepizza is today, you have to look back. The current situation is the consequence of a trend that began in the nineties. After a spectacular IPO in 1996, at the end of 1999 its founder sold his stake (months before the collapse of the dotcom bubbleby the way). This sale marked the beginning of an era in which Telepizza became a financial asset at the hands of venture capital funds and its valuation fell with each movement. In 2007, Telepizza went public after the takeover bid by the Permira and Ballvé fund and was valued at 850 million euros. In 2016, after the entry of the KKR fund, it went public again, although with quite disastrous results. Here the valuation had dropped to 780 million euros, but the worst thing is that not even three years passed when the KKR group launched another takeover bid again for take it out of the bag againvaluing it only in 600 million euros. Paradoxically, 2017 was a good year for the company’s accounts, which achieved record profits. Right after it was signed the agreement with Pizza Hut in which Telepizza committed to opening 1,300 restaurants, almost nothing. The plan ended up going awry internal tensions and the pandemic. In the end Telepizza broke up with Pizza Hut in many of the countries in which it was going to operate. In 2023, the debt caused the KKR fund left the equation and a financial restructuring was signed in which the company passed into the hands of its creditors, among which are Oak Hill and Fortress, two opportunistic funds, also known as vulture funds. Under this new mandate the objective was to try to stabilize the losses with the exit from Latin Americaalthough They couldn’t sell everything. The image speaks for itself In contrast, its most direct competitor, Domino’s Pizza, has had a stable trajectory of growth and is in good financial healthyou just have to look at its growth curve on the stock market. In addition to the global parent company, behind Domino’s Pizza Spain is Alsea, the Mexican restaurant provider which also manages brands such as Starbucks, Burger King or Foster’s Hollywood. Venture capital has squeezed Telepizza so much that has left it without operating marginleading it to a delicate situation that has lasted for years and that calls into question its continuity. In the end, the secret was not in the dough, but in being a restaurant chain and not a financial asset that passes from hand to hand. Image | Telepizza In Xataka | Robotic vans are already key in … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.