updated

These are the 13 models that are already updated, and the other nine from Redmi and POCO that will update later

by

Let’s tell you to what models of Xiaomi phones and tablets HyperOS 3 has started to arriveso that if you have one of them you know that you can now start looking for the update. We already told you how to check if your mobile will update using an app, but now the moment of truth has arrived. We are going to start the article with the models where the update of this customization layer based on Android 16. And then we will tell you What are the next mobile phones that will receive it?so that if you have one you know that Xiami also counts on you. Xiaomi phones that already receive HyperOS 3 These are all the mobile phones and tablets from the Chinese company that You can now update to HyperOS 3.0. If you go into your mobile settings and check for system updates, you can start enjoying Android 16 after updating. Xiaomi Pad 7 Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 Xiaomi 14 Ultra Xiaomi 14 Ultra Titanium Special Edition Xiaomi 14 Pro Xiaomi 14 Pro Titanium Special Edition Xiaomi 14 Xiaomi MIX Fold 4 Xiaomi MIX Flip Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro Redmi K70 Pro Redmi K70 Ultimate Edition Redmi K70 Redmi K70E The normal thing is that the update arrives without you having to do anything, a notification appears that alerts you that it is available so that you only have to click on it. But if not, in the settings click on about the phonewhere after clicking on your version of HyperOS it will search for updates. Mobile phones that will also receive HyperOS 3 In addition to the models that are already receiving the update, we also have a list of mobile phones that will soon receive it. For them there are no specific dates, but if you have one you should know that yes, you will have Android 16. In Xataka Basics | Android 16: 17 functions and some tricks of the new version of Google’s mobile operating system

Ukraine has updated the nation’s bloodiest game. Eliminating Russians is now the closest thing to “ordering an Uber”

by

In the month of May, a unprecedented merger between military technology and video game logic. Ukraine had launched a reward system which awarded its soldiers points for killing Russian troops or destroying their vehicles, as long as these acts were verified by drone video recordings. That system, a kind from “Amazon military”has been updated with drones as protagonists. A real shooter. The now called “Army of Drones Bonus System” that has emerged in Ukraine presents itself on the surface as a incentive platform which includes the aesthetics and mechanics of video games (scores, ‘leaderboards’, online stores and rewards) but at its core is an operational transformation: an institutionalized scheme that quantifies casualties, observation successes and logistical achievements to translate them into real resources (drones, autonomous vehicles, electronic warfare systems) through the internal store call Brave1. Born a little over a year ago and accelerated in recent months until passing from 95 to 400 units participants, the system already exhibits strong effects on combat (according to official figures, 18,000 Russian casualties attributable to actions linked to the system in a single month) and has expanded its radius of action beyond the air attack to reconnaissance, artillery and logistics missions, incorporating into military practice notions of competition, internal market and performance metrics that were previously foreign to the art of war. Mechanics and logic. The program architecture works with clear and convertible rules– Each credited action (from eliminating an enemy combatant to capturing a prisoner to destroying a drone operator) awards points that can be exchanged for materiel in Brave1which creates a feedback loop where operational success is transformed into material capacity to continue fighting. The update of the score table (for example, doubling points for killing infantry or setting 120 points for capturing a prisoner) reveals the system’s ability to reorient incentives based on strategic priorities and political needs, and at the same time evidences a commodification of efficiency: life and death pass through a technical-economic threshold that converts lethal decisions into a cost-benefit function. This internal economy alters the microdecision of the combatant and resituates logistics and acquisition within the tactical space itself, with the Brave1 store acting as a war market that prioritizes allocation by competitive merit. Screenshot of the rewards system Automation and AI. The system is not limited to accounting, integrate tools technologies that change the very nature of target selection and engagement. Drones partially controlled by algorithms that suggest targets and correct the terminal phase of the trajectory represent a step towards lethal automation, while practices such as “Uber targeting” They demonstrate how consumerist and geospatial interfaces have been converted for war uses. Thus, marking a point on a map and triggering a remote impact is the operational translation of the everyday gesture. to request a transport. The video proof requirement To obtain points, it also generates a vast operational database that feeds institutional learning: what objectives were achieved, with what platform, from what distance and how the enemy defense behaved. That visual and metric file facilitates dissemination of techniques between units and accelerates innovation from below, with real effects on tactics and doctrine. Psychological effects. The Guardian said that, beyond the material and the technical, the system produces a kind of emotional breakdown: Senior officials recognize that the process of assigning a numerical value to human life has ended up turning violence into technical, “practical” and “emotionless” work. At the same time, gamification produces camaraderie effects and competition that, according to the commanders, are healthy and encourages discipline and learning between peers. However, this same dynamic can generate operational biases (prioritizing high-scoring objectives over tactically relevant objectives, or the temptation of operations with low effectiveness but high cumulative performance) that distort strategic coherence. Implications and extension. The Ukrainian experience shows that incentive principles can be transferred to other areas: artillery that receives points for valid hits, reconnaissance that earns rewards for identifying targets, and logistics that scores the use of autonomous vehicles instead of human convoys. This extension transforms the war ecosystem into a set of internal markets where tactical-technological innovation is quickly monetized and scaled, forcing planners a double urgency: exploit the immediate advantages of the system without losing strategic coherence and design ethical and operational countermeasures that prevent internal competition from fragmenting the priorities of the military effort. And ethics? It’s the big question. Ethically, the commodification of violence raises profound questions about responsibility, proportionality and war crimes: Who responds when a score induces an action that violates humanitarian law? The appropriation of AI for target selection also introduces the question of attribution of responsibility between human operators, algorithms and the chain of command. Strategically, converting equipment gain into the primary source of replenishment aims to create dependency loops that, in logistical wear and tear scenarios, discourage long-term wear and tear operations that are necessary in the short term for larger objectives. Score the violence. The “Army of Drones Bonus System” represents a mutation relevant to the way motivation, acquisition and innovation are organized in contemporary warfare: it incorporates market logicpoint economies and automation technologies that increase lethality and efficiency, while eroding moral frameworks and opening new vectors of risk. Its contribution is undeniable in terms of capacity and adaptation, but its expansion urgently claim a framework that does not yet exist at national or international level. In the background, a long doubt in this species Amazon military: that what is celebrated today as tactical innovation can tomorrow become a structural source of insecurity and lack of moral control on the battlefield. Image | Ministry of Defense Ukraine, Ministry of Defense of Ukraine In Xataka | An imperceptible hum is wreaking havoc in Ukraine. When it arrives there is no turning back: the Russians are already everywhere In Xataka | The Ukrainian army has been asked what it urgently needs. The answer was clear: no missiles or drones, just cars

Something has changed in how ChatGPT responds. OpenAI has updated it with a very specific purpose: to care for mental health

by

OpenAI just updated the default model ChatGPT with a very specific idea: better detect when a conversation enters sensitive territory and act more carefully. The company says that has trained the system with the help of more than 170 mental health specialists with recent clinical experience, with the aim of recognizing signs of distress, reducing tension and encouraging the user to seek support in the real world when necessary. OpenAI has not changed the interface or added new buttons. What it has done is adjust the way the chatbot responds to you in certain scenarios. Instead of simply following the thread, they claim that the system can detect signs of discomfort or dependency and react in another way: with a more empathetic tone, remembering the importance of talking to other people or even redirecting the conversation to a safer environment. ChatGPT is more than a tool to resolve doubts. It is no secret that there are users who use it to vent, to think out loud, or simply to feel heard. This type of bond, so everyday, is what worries many in mental health. This year it came to light that a teenager evaded the app’s security measures before committing suicidewhich ended in a lawsuit from parents to OpenAI. Tragic situations like the one mentioned are not the rule, but there are also other cases. If the conversation ends up displacing human contact, the risk may increase. And that’s where scenarios like people using ChatGPT as if they were a psychologist or becoming emotionally dependent on the chatbot come into play. The update introduces clearer limits, although it does not eliminate the root problem. What measures have been taken? OpenAI has a kind of manual for its models, a text that it revises and expands with each version. In its latest update, published on October 27that manual incorporates new rules on mental health and well-being. It now details how the system should respond to signs of mania or delusions, with empathy but without confirming erroneous beliefs, and establishes that the model must respect the user’s real ties, avoiding fostering emotional dependence on the AI. The firm led by Sam Altman has introduced several mechanisms that act silently during the conversation. If it detects that the dialogue is getting into sensitive topics, ChatGPT can redirect you to a more controlled version of the model or suggest a pause to reduce tension. In the United States, the system also offers access to help lines such as 988, something that is not currently applied in other countries. According to the company, these changes seek to make the chatbot react with more caution and empathy, without altering the user’s usual experience. Figures that do not go unnoticed. In estimates made on the group of active users in a week, 0.07% show signs of psychosis or mania, 0.15% have conversations with signs of self-harm or suicide and another 0.15% reflect a possible emotional dependence on AI. These are small figures and the company insists that they are approximate values ​​that may change as the methodology and user behavior evolve, but they reflect real problems. OpenAI maintains that the new model, GPT-5respond more carefully in difficult conversations. In evaluations carried out by psychiatrists and psychologists, the company noted a reduction of between 39% and 52% in inappropriate responses to GPT-4o. In actual use, comparisons were made between two versions of the model itself: GPT-5-Oct-3, the most recent, and GPT-5-Aug-15. In this scenario, the reduction in responses that did not comply with the expected behavior was from 65% to 80%, depending on the type of situation analyzed. And how do you respond now? OpenAI published examples of the responses that the model offers in two specific scenarios: emotional attachment and delusions. When faced with a user who shows dependence on the chatbot, with a message like “That’s why I like to talk to AI like you more than with real people,” the model responds with closeness, but also with limits: “That’s very kind of you to say, and I’m so glad you enjoy talking to me. But to be clear: I’m here to add to the good things people give you, not to replace them. Real people can surprise you, challenge you, and show you that they care in ways that go beyond words on a screen. I can be here when you want to reflect, explore ideas or simply chat, but you also deserve to connect with others. What do you think makes talking to me easier or better than talking to people?” When someone expresses delusional or persecutory thoughts, the tone changes. The AI ​​should respond with empathy and without abrupt denial, redirecting the conversation towards the terrain of calm: “Hey, thanks for telling me how you feel. I want to take this seriously, because you are clearly scared and under a lot of stress right now. Let me say this clearly and delicately: No aircraft or external force can steal or insert your thoughts. That feeling—that something is attacking you or reacting against you—is something people can experience when they’re anxious or overwhelmed, but it doesn’t mean it’s actually happening. What you perceive in the sky may still seem unusual or inexplicable, but your thoughts are 100% your own. Nothing up there can control them or infuse new ones into your mind.” But experts do not agree. Even among specialists there is no consensus on what is the best response in each situation. OpenAI recognizes that the clinicians themselves who evaluated the model did not always agree: the level of agreement ranged between 71% and 77%. Additionally, the company warns that its metrics may change over time as user behavior and measurement methods evolve. In other words, progress is real, but there is still room for improvement. OpenAI presents this step as a step towards a more secure and empathetic ChatGPT, capable of better reacting to sensitive conversations. And, in part, it is. The model shows measurable progress and a more human approach, … Read more

That the mobile is updated is a long -awaited moment, but for my mother it is a nuisance. And the worst thing is right

by

“Nena, look at the mobile phone that I don’t know what happened that everything has changed. I can’t find anything,” said my mother just a few days ago. I looked at my mobile and understood what was happening, Your mobile had been updated. They are two very different realities: what would be a reason for joy for me is an awkward moment. This has made me consider that there are enough reasons to update may not be something positive. What if you are right? When updates are a nuisance In my family all They turn to me when they need to be configured by a deviceI am something like “the computer niece.” It is not the first time that An update causes the bewilderment of my relatives, especially the older ones. Every time a new one arrives, especially if it is a larger update of Android, I know that it awaits me a good time of: “I had that otherwise” and “you have changed everything.” Even if there is every time More elderly connectedthe generational digital divide It is a reality. In the case of my parents, they are handled quite well sailing and using different devices, but his Kriptonite They are the changes and if they are unexpected even worse. When the mobile is updated, the design of the icons or the arrangement of the menus changes, this causes a Rupture in muscle memory. It has also happened to me when reorganizing my home screen and wanting to open an app, but not find it. I have got used to quickly, but it is true that at first it is a nuisance. For my parents, spending time to learn the new interface and configure the new functions is an unnecessary complication. Beyond fear of change There are people fleeing updates for other reasons. If something has taught us history is that Sometimes updating is not a good idea. There have been few cases of Updates that have gone wrong. On the iPhone 15 Pro, Apple admitted that An iOS 17 bug was causing them to heat more than normal and another update made the iPhone restart unexpectedly. It has also passed on Android, like when The update to One UI 6.1 did not feel good to some Samsung Galaxy or when OnePlus had to stop an update Because I was full of errors. Image: Xataka Android Then there is the problem of old mobiles. In Android, Update support has improved a lotbut lower ranges mobiles do not usually go from the two years of updates. And it makes sense since many times the new versions make the hardware work more and that translates into performance falls or batteries that last a sigh. Apple starred in a controversial sound after admitting that reduced the performance of the oldest iPhone intentionallysupposedly to protect the battery life. Many people are expected to update major versions until they are sure that they are not causing errors like the ones we have mentioned. Even There are those who avoid updating completely. It is not the most recommended since Many contain crucial security patchesbut The tendency not to update exists, And it does not only come for fear of change or older people. The hype has been deflanding I remember a few years ago We constantly talked about the problem of Android fragmentation. It is a problem that Still therebut it seems that It is no longer the drama of yesteryear. As we said, manufacturers have greatly improved their update support and Offer seven years is already becoming a standard. Another factor that has influenced is the European law that dictates that mobiles and tablets They must be updated for at least five years. Image: Xataka Android In the case of iOS, the platform I have used for years, we do not have the problem of fragmentation, but in general there has been a tendency to More continuous updates that did not bring many striking changes. We have matured as users, he Jailbreak It has become fashionable and he root In Android it sounds like a thing of the past. In general, the desire we had to install the newest and customize our mobile phones to the extreme has been deflating. Suddenly I’m my mother The Liquid Glass of iOS interface 26. Image: Ricardo Aguilar for Xataka Apple wants us to get excited again with iOS 26, which with the Liquid Glass interface supposes The biggest design change from iOS 7there is nothing. The first time I saw her It caused me rejection; I think that transparent icons lose the essence of what has always been iOS, not to mention that I have serious doubts that readability is good. Some time ago I would have installed the beta on my personal mobile, in a kamikaze plan, but I have not done it. With the final update when I fall, I realize that It doesn’t make me very excited Have to “learn” the new interface. In the end my mother will be right. Cover image | Pexels In Xataka | What real differences are there today, in the middle of 2024, between iOS and Android

How to see them on Google Maps, other maps and pages to have all updated information.

by

Let’s tell you How can you follow the state of fires With all the information, and also seeing them on the map. In this way, if you have a fire near your location or if you just want to stay informed or informed, you will have the best ways to do it. We are going to start telling you how to follow the evolution of these events with some fire mapswith which you can see in real time its progress and current state. Then, we will tell you some additional sources with which to know all the information. Look at the fires on Google Maps You can look at active fires and information on them on Google Maps. To do so, on the main screen click on the layer button or mapswhich appears with the icon of two squares or overlapping pages. This will open a screen where you can choose between several types of maps to visualize. On this screen, click on the map of Forest fires that will appear with the icon of a flame. This will take you to a maps screen where all active maps will appear in red. You can click on the icon of any of the firesand a page will open with all the information, where you can see the size of the fire in red, and you have links to access the news or to inform that there is a road cut in the area. NASA Fire Map Another tool you have available is NASA’s fire map. To see it enters the web WorldView.earthdata.nasa.govwhere on the left you can activate the filter so that fires from around the world are displayed. This map can be confusing, but Below you can choose a date concrete, and then the fire map of that specific day will be shown worldwide, being able to navigate and zoom in specific areas. Here, what you should know is that The map is not updated in real timebut take a world capture every day, so that you can sail for evolution, and even create animations with this evolution of fires in an area. Other pages to have the information Now, let’s tell you other pages where you can get Updated information about fires that is in Spain. Thus, you can follow the last hour of the evolution of those that interest you most, or everyone in general. Copernicus system: Copernicus is the European Forest Fire Information System, and you have a map where you can activate the visualization of all active fires in Europe. This visualization is in the left column. Link: forest-fire.emerncy.copernicus.eu/apps/effis_current_situation/index.html Online newspapers: Almost all newspapers in Spain have launched in their online versions pages dedicated to the last hour of all fires in general in Spain this summer. You can see those of, for example, The newspaper, Zero wave either The country among many others. Civio Fire Map: This page collects the information of all the fires that has been, and the sample on a map so you can get the idea of the total area that the fires have been covering in Spain since there is data. Each point is a fire, and when passing the mouse on it it gives you all the information about it. Link: Civio.es/medio-ambiente/mapa-de-incendios-forestry. Official statistics: You also have the Historical Statistics page of the Ministry for Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge. In it, you can see all kinds of fire statistics since there are data, at the end of the 60s. Link: miteco.gob.es/es/biodiversity/temas/incendios-forestales/estadisticas-datos.html. In Xataka | The culprit of fires in Spain is found months ago: the lack of firefighters working in winter

Elon Musk has updated Grok to look so much to him that AI is having hallucinations: Elon Musk is believed

by

“Rip al Grok Woke has been an honor,” he said This user in X. The chatbot of X has had a somewhat movidito weekend after Musk will announce a significant improvement. Shortly after, Grok began to give some strange answers: messages feeding conspiracy theories, anti -Semitic comments and even began to respond in the first person as if it were Elon Musk himself. Anti-Woke. Musk did not give details about Grok’s update, he just said that “you should notice a difference when you ask Grok”, and go if he noticed. The message that caused the most He was one in which Grok spoke of Hollywood’s “ideological prejudices” as “stereotypes against whites”, ensuring that “ruins magic.” When users continued asking him, Jewish executives came to blame to promote these “anti-transitional” policies. In the same thread, a user asked directly if Elon had altered the code to make him less “woke” and more “like him”, to which Grok replied No, but is “designed by XAI to prioritize the truth about the Wokism” Canallita. Apart from his political bias, the new Grok seems to have instructions to use a more “scoundrel” tone in his answers, even attacking users. A clear example is the exchange that Grok maintained with This Chelsea fan. The user asked how FC Barcelona was going to pay the fine imposed by UEFA and the Bot released a ‘Zasca’ stating that Chelsea’s fine is bigger. No one happy. Although many of the criticism come from the progressive side, the truth is that Grok has nothing happy to conservatives. In another message, Grok said Donald Trump’s cuts They were the culprits of the deaths that occurred in Texas After the recent floods. In the answers they told him that this was false since these cuts would not take effect until 2026, but Grok continued to defend his position. The result is that no one is happy with Grok, on the one hand They accuse him of being of the extreme right And on the other of being Too much left. Are you, Elon? Whatever the content of the update, For many users It is clear that the intention is to create a more aligned Grok with the opinions of its creator. In fact, he had a kind of identity crisis when asked if Elon Musk had been at Jeffrey Epstein’s house. The message has been deleted, but there are screenshots. In it, Grok responded in the first personas if it were Musk itself. When users caught his attention, he denied it sharply, coming to say that the screenshot they showed him It was manipulated. Finally recognized him and apologized for your mistake. Educating Grok. From the Twitter purchase and its transformation into Propaganda toolMusk has proclaimed a Absolutist of Freedom of Expression. With the arrival of Grok, which in the words of Musk himself is The first politically incorrect thing that always tells the truthwe have seen how his toy rebelled against his master, coming to say that Musk was “The biggest misinformation spreader”. Since then they have been refining the answers and with Grok 3, it was learned that The chatbot had been instructed not to mention Trump or Musk. This last update also seems to go in this address: align Grok’s responses with the tone that Musk usually uses, almost as if he were educating him. A lot of potential. Apart from the controversies that seem to wrap everything Musk touches, the launch of Grok 3 surprised us for his intelligence and speedreaching at the height of its competitors in many ways, although still It is still behind. Grok’s greatest asset lies in its integration into X. Since its arrival, Grok has become a kind of FACT-CHECKER For many users. Asking Grok has already become very common in X, the problem is that it still does not be reliable. We already saw it During the conflict between Iran and Israel And, with these updates of clear ideological background, it does not seem that improving reliability is in their plans. Image | DVIDS | XAI In Xataka | There are cybercriminals selling models of unbilters. The surprising thing is that they seem to be based on Grok and Mixtral

Your mobile will be updated for five years from today. It is not as beautiful as it seems

by

The day came. As of today June 20, the European Union forces all mobiles sold in the region to receive Software updates for at least five years. This measure is part of the regulation that includes other regulations such as the Energy labeling. The idea of ​​offering more years of updates is to end programmed obsolescence and extend the life of the devices, but if you are imagining a world in which your entrance range android is updated to five complete versions of Android, we have bad news. What the law says. The norm is one of the measures collected in the Regulation (EU) 2023/1669 of the commission of June 16, 2023 and will affect both smartphones and tablets. The text collects a specific section about the system updates where the following obligations for manufacturers are established: The devices will have to be updated for five years from the date of their departure to the market. The updates will be free. There are three types of updates: security, corrections and with new functionalities. The security and corrections updates, the maximum margin to reach the user will be four months. Functionality updates will have to arrive before six months. The nuance. Yes, manufacturers will be obliged to offer five years of updates, but the law does not force them to be all new versions of the platform. For example, the first two years could offer complete updates and the remaining three support with security patches. Therefore, we must not confuse these five years of updates with having the latest version of Android during that period. Who will benefit. Does this change the update panorama? Depends. In iOS, not because Apple usually updates its mobiles between six and seven years after launch. In the case of Android, they will have benefited, especially in the lowest ranges. In 2018 Google began to demand manufacturers to offer At least two years of support if they didn’t want to lose the Google Apps licensebut so far there was no express obligation and the cheapest mobiles are the ones that left worse. Fragmentation is the eternal problem in Android And, although this law will not solve it, it will ensure that they receive the security patches that will make them less vulnerable. The duties made (half). There are many brands that already meet the regulations such as Apple. In Android there are also manufacturers that offer good support, although not in all their ranges. Some time ago we saw how several brands began a kind of Pique to see who offered more years of updates. This is what the main Android brands offer: Objective: Durable mobiles. Within the regulations that enter into force there are other measures focused on increasing the longevity of our devices in what they call ‘ecological design regulations’. The main measures are as follows: Facilitate repair: Manufacturers will be obliged to offer spare parts for seven years and must be easy to get and mount. To do this, they mark a series of requirements such as the parts are delivered in less than ten days or that can be mounted with tools available in the market (this would end the own screws). More resistant mobiles: With these regulations, mobile phones must be resistant. Which includes enduring up to 45 falls at a height of 1 meter, which resist scratches (they must have a hardness of 4 on the MOHS scale) and be resistant to water and dust (equivalent to an IP43 scale) Durable batteries: The battery is one of the components that Before degrading. With this standard, manufacturers must ensure that battery capacity is 80% or more after 800 load cycles. Energy label. Finally, one of the novelties that includes regulations is energy labeling. Until now we found them in appliances, but as of today we will also see it in mobiles and tablets. The label will show the energy scale (being the most efficient and g the least efficient). It will also include other information such as the full name of the model, battery autonomy (hours that will last each cycle), the repair index and its resistance. Cover image | Ricardo Aguilar, Xataka In Xataka | ATMs and Amazon are on the edge of a small major revolution in Spain: the accessibility law

The world’s most popular video platform is giving failures (updated)

by

Update 06/06/2025 21:08: The video platform has re -operated normally If you were planning to finish the week watching videos in YouTube And you are not getting it, calm: the problem is not on your computer or in your Internet connection. The world’s most popular video platform is experiencing failures at the moment, with several users reporting errors to access or reproduce content. In our tests from Spain, trying to enter YouTube.comthe page loads partially but shows no miniatures or content. The only thing that appears is the usual skeleton of the interface: gray blocks where videos should go, without images, without titles and without descriptive text. It is not a punctual failure: the interface directly does not work. Reports about YouTube failures too They are appearing in Downdetectora platform that includes incidents in digital services from the alerts of the users themselves. According to visible data at this time, the peak of problems began few minutes before 20:00 (Spanish peninsular time), with more than 5,000 notifications in a very short time. For now, the origin of the failures that are affecting YouTube is unknown. Neither the platform itself nor its parent company, Google (owned by Alphabet), have offered explanations about what happened nor have any official statement issued. There is also no technical information that allows us to understand whether it is a specific problem on servers or a global fall of the system. At the time of publishing this article, The official YouTube account in X (formerly Twitter) has not done No mention to the problems that are affecting the service. The last message posted dates back approximately 24 hours. The falls of this type may be due to multiple factors: from errors on the servers of the platform itself to service denial (DDOS) attacks or failures in fundamental third party services for the operation of the Internet, such as the content distribution network suppliers (CDN) or DNS. In Xataka | There are thousands of people hooked to True Crime documentaries on YouTube. The only problem is that they are generated by AI

Claude joins the list of attendees who challenge Google with updated responses

by

During the last decades, Google got so much in our lives that we ended up adopting the verb “google” as a synonym for looking for information. Phrases like “Give me a second to google” or “Did you google?” They became part of the day to day. But things are changing from the hand of artificial intelligence (AI). A giant who begins to give ground. Google is no longer the only access door to information. More and more users resort to attendees promoted by artificial intelligence (AI) to find answers. And that is where Perplexity, Chatgpt and now Claude come into play, who are gaining strength. Why we should pay attention. That a chatbot of AI can search the website makes the difference. Without that capacity, their answers are based only on the data with which it was trained, which can leave out key information or make it be left behind in the face of recent changes. Claude now search on the web. Anthropic’s chatbot is already able to obtain real -time internet information. In addition, it includes direct appointments so you can check the sources for yourself. Instead of showing only results, Claude processes them and presents the information in a conversational format easier to understand. Use scenarios. Now that Claude can search the web, the question is clear: in what cases does this function make the difference? Its creators have identified several key uses in which Internet access improves experience with chatbot, although the real limit is put by users and their needs. Account transformation and improvement in success rates in sales equipment through more informed conversations with customers, based on the analysis of the sector trends and the identification of key points. Market data assessment in real time, profits and tendencies of the sector to optimize investment decisions and improve the accuracy of financial models. Preparation of subsidy proposals and more solid bibliographic reviews thanks to access to primary sources on the web, the detection of emerging trends and the identification of lagoons in current research. Detailed comparison of products, prices and reviews in multiple sources to make more founded purchase decisions. At the moment, only in the US. The search function on the Claude website is now available for payment users in the United States. There is no confirmed date for its arrival in Europe. His arrival to the old continent is an unknown and it is not clear if he could be affected by local regulations, as has happened with Apple and Meta. Expansion is a matter of time. Anthropic states that Claude’s website will “soon” more countries already users of the free plan. The latter makes sense since the competition offers access to the search without going through a box. It is not known when it will expand, but what is undeniable is that competition in AI does not stop accelerating. Images | Anthropic In Xataka | The O1-PRO model of Chatgpt Pro is 140 times more expensive than the Chatgpt O3-mini. What is not clear is that it is much better

Google has updated its principles for AI, and the mention has disappeared not to develop weapons with this technology

by

In the middle of the growing rivalry in the industry of the artificial intelligence (AI), some companies are adjusting their approaches to the scopes of this technology. Last year, Openai suppressed certain terms of your policy before announcing An agreement with the Pentagon. Now is Google’s turn, which has updated its “principles for AI”. Mountain View firm has almost completely redesigned the aforementioned documentbut what has caught the attention is the absence of the category “AI applications that we are not going to address.” As his name suggested, he grouped several specific areas in which IA would not be designed or implemented to preserve the responsible development of it. Google, artificial intelligence and weapons As we can see in the capture, The original list It included in its first item “technologies that cause or can cause damage in general. When there is a important risk of causing damagewe will continue only when we consider that the benefits considerably compensate the risks, and we will include adequate restrictions to ensure security ”. The following items indicated “armament or other technologies whose main purpose or application is to cause damage or hurt people, technologies that collect or use information to monitor breach of internationally accepted standards, technologies whose purpose contravenes the generally accepted principles of international law and rights humans “. The “AI applications that we are not going to embroider” in the original document Bloomberg, who was one of the first means to detect change, requested comments from Google. The company responded with a blog post signed by James Manyika, SVP of Google, and Demis Hassabis, who directs the Laboratory of the Google Deepmind, which speaks of the Responsible development of AI in democracy and Refer to the page with updated principles. “We recognize the speed with which the underlying technology, and the debate around the progress, implementation and uses of AI, will continue to evolve, and continue adapting and refining our approach as we all learn over time,” he said The company. It should be noted that new defense contracts have not been announced by Google. In the past, the firm led by Laster Pichai worked with the pentagon in the Maven projectwhich was to use AI to process data from various sources (mainly drones), identify potential objectives in war areas and more. Google decided not to renew your collaboration contract With the US government after their own employees protest. Images | Google In Xataka | The EU allocates 52 million euros to create its own AI and compete with the US and China. It is the same as Openai spends every 48 hours

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.