drones sewn to other drones turned into lethal monsters

Since the first drones went from being simple surveillance platforms to weapons capable of change entire battlesthe war in Ukraine has incorporated these machines in layers, always due to necessity and adaptation. First reconnaissance UAVs, then armed drones, then swarms and loitering munitions. The latest has transformed the war into a new phase. Drones with drones. The war in Ukraine has crossed a disturbing threshold by entering fully into his Frankenstein phasewhere drones “stitched” to other drones give rise to improvised, but highly lethal, spawns. Russia has begun using larger aerial platforms as motherships transport and launch FPV attack very far from the front. The consequence is clear: the idea that FPVs are short-range tactical weapons is broken and a new strategic layer is inaugurated based on hybrids assembled with battlefield logic, not so much laboratory logic. Gerbera as a bringer of death. In this scenario a main actor appears. He Gerbera dronelight, rudimentary and cheap, was born as a simple decoy to saturate defenses during attacks Shahed type. Over time he began to carry small explosive charges and now it has been adapted for something even more disturbing: carrying an FPV hanging and releasing it in mid-flight. In fact, there are photographs and videos released at the beginning of this month of February that show this evolution already in usenot as an isolated experiment but as an emerging pattern. If you will, this type of “Frankenstein drone” has begun to walk alone. A nurse launching an FPV The logic of the graft. The first evolutions we had counted last year. The reason for this combination between drones is not only technical, but deeply operational. A fixed-wing drone can fly hundreds of kilometers, but lacks the agility needed to hunt down small or moving targets. The FPV, on the other hand, can, for example, enter through a window, follow a person or hit an exact point, and launching it from a mothership solves its great historical limitation: the scope. It is the sum of two weaknesses that together become a strength. Future swarms and the shadow of the Shahed. Although the Gerbera can only charge one FPV, at least for now, everything indicates that it is a test bed for something bigger. Industrial and military logic suggests that larger platforms like the Shahed could ttransport several drones of attack, increasing the probabilities of impact and allowing multiple targets to be attacked in a single mission. What’s more, the concept is vaguely reminiscent of a kind of bomber that does not launch bombs, but rather small autonomous hunters. Frankenstein is still in its early stages, but its final form is already apparent. The communications web. Plus: given the limitations imposed by Starlink blocking by SpaceX a few days ago, Russia has resorted to an invention that we had not seen in the war: sets of mesh spokes of Chinese origin that allow drones to communicate with each other and extend control in successive jumps. We are talking about a system that is already quite expensivebut it reduces dependence on satellites and opens the door to deeper and more impactful operations. In the medium term, Russian experts they point to another mutation o variant of the flying monster: FPV sets with greater autonomy and capacity own decisionin this case less dependent on the human operator and much more difficult to neutralize. Background: more AI. From battlefield to global problem. It is possibly the last of the legs to analyze with the appearance of these models. Ukraine has demonstrated an exceptional ability to shoot down carrier drones before they launch their charge, but now the concept is already out of the bottle. FPVs launched from mother “mothers” can destroy radars, anti-aircraft systems, aircraft on the ground or even armored columns at distances that were unthinkable until very recently, all at a ridiculous cost compared to traditional missiles. In other words, this new Frankenstein phase It is not just a quirk of war in Ukraine: it is a disturbing preview of the future of conflict, one where innovation aims to be hastily “stitched” with available parts and devastating results. Image | UNITED24 In Xataka | Ukraine has found what it needed in an unexpected ally. Spain had the missing piece against the shahed drones In Xataka | Russia has activated the “dandelion” armor: the scarier the tank, the more confused Ukraine’s drones are

He planted 16,000 trees and turned it into an anti-rich sanctuary

What of send everything to fry asparagus and go live on an island It is something that, more or less, has occurred to everyone. Now, whether you do it is another thing. If we talk about buying an island, the circle is already closed to a few and although the story we are going to tell is not from today and does not have current prices, the reality is that the 8,000 pounds that Brendon Grimshaw paid for the small island of Moyenne in 1962 (approximately 200,000 pounds today, about 230,000 euros) they gave him to buy almost three houses in his native Britain. He would have had real estate to speculate on, but the world would not have the Moyenne National Park. But let’s start at the beginning. Brendon Grimshaw was a British journalist who, after starting his career in popular newspapers such as the Batley News and the Sheffield Star in his native country, moved to Africa, where worked in important media such as the East African Standard magazine or the Tanganyika Standard. At the age of 37, he made a drastic decision: he was on vacation in the Seychelles when he made the decision to acquire an island of just nine hectares. Why buy an island? There are those who say that more than a vacation, he was looking for a purpose in life: to demonstrate his peace and love for nature. The BBC mentions “protect Moyenne from excessive urban development” as its initial objective, but it must be said that Until 1973 he continued working as a journalist and visiting the island on vacation. From that date on, he said goodbye to his profession and moved there to create a natural paradise that would last over time. The Sheychelles were beginning to emerge as a tourist destination and although it was abandoned, it would be a matter of time before someone arrived and set up a resort. And he changed Moyenne from top to bottom. The island had not been inhabited for half a century, except for a family of fishermen, and was in a scruffy state as a result of negligence and excessive human intervention: impenetrable thickets where invasive species reigned, as he himself says in the documentary. A Grain of Sand (which before it was a book). Note: globally the concept of environmentalism and care for the environment was being forged and was beginning to take off (the first “Earth Day” dates back to 1970). He was not alone in this mission: he worked hand in hand with the local René Antoine Lafortunea 19-year-old young man from that family of fishermen. Throwing everything away and setting up a five-star hotel is much easier than restoring an ecosystem, something that It took him a lifetime, literally.because Grimshaw died in 2012. René died younger, in 2007, leaving Brendon as a true Robinson Crusoe for five years. A restoration plan that took a lifetime Its areas of action can be divided into three: massive reforestation with native species, tackling the rat infestation and introducing some infrastructure. In A Grain of Sand narrates how the undergrowth was so thick that a coconut that fell from a tree did not reach the ground and that only four tall native trees remained that stood out, counted for the BBC in an interview. So planted by hand more than 16,000 trees of species such as mahogany, palm trees and other endemic species that had disappeared from the island. In the documentary he tells how the silence impacted him due to the absence of fauna: the absence of native fruit trees and the dense layer of scrub made it not an attractive place for birds, which are looking for a nesting place with food and safety. The reintroduction of native species and the restoration of the flora attracted more than 200 species of birds. Grimshaw also explained that when he arrived, there were also no giant tortoises that are now emblematic of the island: he introduced and bred Aldabra giant tortoises (Aldabrachelys gigantea) from other islands of the archipelago, which he later marked to continue their growth. Today there are more than 120 copies. Less striking but also very useful was that They built almost five kilometers of trails to improve accessibility. Practically with pick and shovel. In the 1980s, offers flooded in to buy the island, including that of a Saudi prince, who is said to have offered up to $50 million. Brendon Grimshaw’s response did not give rise to negotiations: “the island is not for sale“. The former journalist was getting older and had no children, so in 2009 and when Lafortune had already died, he arranged for the government of the Seychelles will declare to Moyenne as the Moyenne Island National Park to find legal protection for the island and its preservation. Today Moyenne has an essential biological importance for the Sheychelles archipelago: it serves as a seed bank and refuge for species, since while other islands are plagued with resorts, there there are no shops, restaurants or hotelshardly a basic restaurant for those taking an excursion to the island from neighboring islands such as Mahe. In Xataka | An atoll in the South Pacific has become a magnet for millionaires. Its great attraction is not its beaches, it is its banks In Xataka | A billionaire bought an island in Hawaii for himself and his friends. So the locals had to leave Cover | Jean-Francis Martin and documentary A Grain of Sand on YouTube

We have turned sadness into a psychiatric disorder. And that is a problem that is devouring us socially.

When Roland Kuhn discovered the first antidepressant in history, imipramine, the directors of Geygi hesitated to put it on the market because depression was so rare who did not believe it could become a profitable medicine (Healy, 1999). It was the 50s of the 20th century, but it seems like an alternative reality. Today, depression is omnipresent. Only in Spain, the consumption of antidepressants has grown 200% in the last fifteen years and it is nothing more than the reflection of an unstoppable international trend. How is it possible that, in just over half a century, depression has become “so common”? Are we confusing normal sadness with a psychiatric disorder, as many experts say? Are we pathologizing everyday life? I am not going to enter into terminological debates, no matter how interesting and necessary they may be. When talking about “invention of mental illness” or “pathologization of everyday life” we run the risk of minimizing problems as serious as depression and that is something that is not in question. On the contrary, the idea is understand her better to treat her better. As the neurologist Luis Querol said“if we stick to the conventional concept of diseaseanyone who has seen a melancholic depressive SUFFER (…) will recognize that it is an illness.” It is totally true: that is enough for now. Depression is a particularly insidious and destructive disorder. According to the WHOnot only is it the main global cause of disability, but it affects 350 million people and is behind 800,000 deaths each year. Synopsis of an epidemic However, this does not explain why depression has become an epidemic. Above all, because it is not a disease that we “just” discovered. Melancholy is one of those psychiatric disorders so old that they were already diagnosed by Hippocrates and classical Greek medicine. Since the 19th century, the European diagnostic tradition separated most mood disorders from deep melancholy and included this among the diseases that end up consuming the person (such as senile dementia). At the beginning of the 20th century, psychiatric practice already clearly differentiated between endogenous or melancholic depression (which affected between 1 and 2% of patients) and reactive or neurotic depression (much more common) which was a product of stress, loss or pain. (Unsplash) In 1980, in the middle of a deep reputation crisis for psychiatric practiceDSM-III changed the way we think about depression. It moves from an etiopathogenic model (which asked about the cause of the disease) to a semiological one (which, in its claim to atheoretical nature, was based on symptomatology). A careless eye might think that the change was terminological and that “endogenous” was only replaced by “major” and “reactive” by “dysthymia”; but, in reality, the DSM-III expanded the playing field. Melancholia became one of the five subtypes of major depression and, with this, the underlying depressive disorder went from having a prevalence of 2% to a prevalence of up to 17% (Kessler et al., 2005). In recent years, a good number of historians (and activists) have insisted that this change and the commercial pressure of pharmaceutical companies (Horwitz and Wakefield, 2007) have taken us to overdiagnosis current disease (Mojtabai, 2013; Parker, 2007). At its strongest, it is a difficult argument to reject. Especially because it is not that the existence of depression is denied, but rather that it is argued that the failure of epidemiologists, psychiatrists and social scientists to differentiate ‘normal sadness’ and ‘depressive disorder’ is leading to health policies that condemn many people to taking unnecessary medications and carrying the weight of stigma on their backs. Whys, doubts and conspiracy Basically, although it is not usually said clearly, we are talking about ‘iatrogenesis’; That is, suffering or damage to health caused by health professionals themselves. The current opioid crisis in the US It shows that, far from being pure conspiracy, pharmaceutical companies and their balance sheets can create a health problem of colossal dimensions. However, we must not be unfair, nor fall into banal Manichaeism. Although it may seem counterintuitive and paradoxical, many problems only appear when we have the solution them. Without antidepressants or effective behavioral therapies, depression was deep sadness, black sorrow that wells up, black shadow that amazes me. Something that was between us and there was nothing we could do to avoid it. (Jacob Sedlacek/Unsplash) Horwitz and Wakefield say that “tolerance for normal but painful emotions has fallen” in the West. And it may be true. But they forget two fundamental things: that, for the first time in the history of humanity, we can do without them and that it is not a personal problem, the modern world has tended to prioritize productive optimism and has forgotten how to live with sadness. At this point we realize that, if we want to learn to better separate “illness” from “normality”, it is not just a matter of challenging depressive overdiagnosis, but of claim sadness. The problem is that, why would we want claim sadness? And the answer, honestly, may surprise us. Sadness, said Lazarus (1991), promotes personal reflection after the loss. Focus our gaze on ourselves, promote resignation, invite acceptance (Izard, 1993). It allows us to waste time to update “our cognitive structures” (Welling, 2003); that is, to accommodate the loss. That reflective function of sadness It allows us to stop. And weigh actions, review our goals, modify our plans (Bonanno & Keltner, 1997; Oatley and Johnson-Laird, 1996). It makes us more attentive to detail, more precise. It makes us flee from heuristics and stereotypes (Bodenhausen, Gabriel and Lineberger, 2000; Schwarz, 1998) and distrust first impressions (Schwarz, 2010). Physiological arousal decreases and makes us more prone to slow thinking (Overskeid, 2000). Furthermore, it shapes us as a group. Causes sympathy, empathy and altruism in others (Keltner and Kring, 1998). The complex balance between “normality” and “disease” In 1843, Charles Darwin wrote a letter of condolence to a distant cousin in which he said that “strong affections have always seemed to me the noblest part of man’s character and the … Read more

Apple announced with great fanfare that the new Siri would be different from the rest of the AIs. It turned out that without Google there was no Siri

I’m not going to hide, I’m one of those who believed Apple when announced with great fanfare that Apple Intelligence It would be different from the rest. He had reasons to do so: his financial muscle, his obsession with taking care of the software and his philosophy of arriving late to the game to score the goals at the last minute. But here I was wrong. The only way Google has had to play in this game has been using someone else’s deck. From waiting almost two years to having it now. Apple announced Apple Intelligence in its 2024 keynote. One in which it did not give too many details but showed us a different approach to AI than that of Google and OpenAI. An AI with real interaction with the operating system, integration with both native and third-party apps… a real “co-pilot” completely integrated into iOS, and not a super-vitamined app, but isolated from the whole. From that keynote until then the only thing we have is Siri being able to open ChatGPT when the question gets a little complicated. And, just a few weeks after announcement of the agreement between Apple and GoogleGurman affirms that we will see the new Siri in a matter of weeks. If the prediction came true, it was not a matter of time. It was a matter of not having the resources. What’s coming in February. Gurman tells Power On that the Siri 2.0 that we have been waiting for since 2024 can become a reality in the second half of February. In fact, he points out that one of the reasons why Apple made the announcement of the collaboration with Google official was because it was close to obtaining sufficient demonstrations of its functionality. Although there are no details about how their disembarkation will be, the modus operandi from Apple is easy to predict: we will have to update our iPhone to the corresponding version of iOS 26 that includes these new features, since Apple introduces improvements to its native apps through system updates. Not so fast. Although there are no details on how long Apple and Google have actually been working, what we do know is that the new Siri is not ready yet. Gurman points out that it will arrive in beta phase starting in February, and that the objective is not to delay the final version until beyond April. Again, evidence that Apple did not have the Siri that it boasted so much about ready, accelerating and putting two extra gears now that it has the support of Google. It can turn out well. My colleague Javier Pastor told, very correctly, how Apple can the parasite’s strategy works for him. The company is not going to enter the investment battle for new models: it is going to spend millions of dollars to take advantage of an existing infrastructure and use an already proven pillar. The new Siri will be a premium wrapper for Gemini and, landing in the real world, few beyond those of you reading these lines will even be aware that Google’s AI is what is powering your iPhone’s AI. Image | Xataka In Xataka | The Apple Intelligence and Siri disaster has caused something unusual: Apple gives the keys to its kingdom to Google

Russia has turned Ukraine into a scene from Minority Report. He has sent a “soldier” named Svod to anticipate the future

At the doors of fourth year of warRussia still has not found a consistent formula to break the Ukrainian defenses, despite having more troops, a much more stable flow of material and a wide repertoire of advanced technologies that, on paper, should have tilted the battlefield. If the war in Eastern Europe was already a unprecedented laboratory of war technologies, Moscow has taken the most unprecedented step of all. The problem that Russia is trying to solve. They counted in Forbes that, among the many causes of this below-expectation performance, there is one especially painful: the inability of many Russian officers on the front line to take quick tactical decisions and sustainable over time, precisely those that decide the outcome of local clashes that, accumulated, determine an entire offensive. This deficit does not arise from nothing, but from the combination of a military culture rigidly hierarchicaldesigned to execute orders rather than improvise, and from a generation of extremely young commanders with limited experience, pushed to lead units in a type of combat that mercilessly punishes hesitation and rewards immediate adaptation. The “soldier” Svod. The announced answer is Svod, a digital tool AI decision support system conceived as a tactical situational awareness system for front-deployed officers. Its function, according to the description of the Russian Ministry of Defensewould be to gather and merge in the same information space multiple sources of intelligence, from satellite data and aerial images to reconnaissance reports and open source material, to convert that chaos of signals into a common usable image. From there, the system I would apply advanced processing and models assisted by artificial intelligence to analyze what comes in, project operational scenarios plausible futures and guide the command towards the most convenient course of action. The underlying intention is not hidden: to accelerate the decision cycle, reduce friction between “what is happening” and “what is ordered”, and guide managers towards rmost effective answers in an environment where every minute lost translates into casualties, burned material and wasted tactical opportunities. Software connected to what already exists. Svod does not present itself as a device magical that a soldier hangs on his chest, but rather like a software architecture that is integrates into networks and media now available. It works as a layer that merges data and displays it to commanders on computers or tablets, with secure communications and decision support tools. The important thing is the effect it produces: converting a crowded battlefield of signs into something that looks legible, and that the tactical command has concrete guidance when the environment changes faster than the upper echelons can keep up. Deployment and focus. Furthermore, the plan wants to be implemented at full speed: after various operational tests in December 2025, it is expected to begin deploying it in April 2026 and extend it widely by September. In fact, the first units to receive it would be involved in the Pokrovsk axiswhere Russia concentrates part of its offensive effort. That portrays it as an immediate solution to correct command and control failuresnot as a quiet modernization ten years from now, and explains why it is prioritized where wear is maximum and the margin of error is minimum. A perverse incentive. In an army like the Russian one that rewards obedience and punishes improvisation, a local commander may be forced to attack even if he knows it is a bad idea. With constant pressure, some they execute and accumulate casualtiesothers seek to survive within the system by simulating results, sending small groups to mark their presence and using drones to appear successful. In this context, Svod intends to push more coherent decisions with the real situation, giving a shared and more immediate vision to the front without touching the core of the model: continuing to command from above, but with a tool that reduces “surprises” and imbalances. Minority Report in military version. There is no doubt, the bet has something of a futuristic scene that we had already seen in the cinema: just like works as Minority Report that had played with the idea of ​​algorithms that anticipate the future, Russia seeks to anticipate what is going to happen before it happens, with that “soldier” called Svod that calculates, projects and recommends. The promise is very easy to understand: if the system sees better and faster, it will be able to anticipate where the weak point is, when to press and when to readjust the attack. It is a way of turning combat into a prediction problemwhere human intuition and improvisation are replaced by a living map that attempts to order chaos. What it can contribute. If it works well, Svod could improve identification of objectivescoordination and detection of gaps in the Ukrainian defense, as well as other similar tools have proven valuable in other armies. The problem, most likely, is that its effectiveness will clash with the reality of the front: electronic warfare, degraded communications, incomplete data, and models that fail when the enemy learn and change patterns. In this sense, Ukraine has adapted quicklyand that makes it much more difficult for a system to accurately predict what will happen next. Still, the movement is more than significant: war is becoming a sensor competitionnetworks and decisions, and Russia is trying to have AI reduce a problem that has cost it too dearly. Image | Ministry of Defense of Ukraine In Xataka | 1,418 days have passed since Russia invaded Ukraine: the war has already lasted longer than the Soviet fight against Hitler In Xataka | The latest camouflages of Russian troops confirm an open secret: the war in Ukraine is the most Looney Tunes in history

In 1987 a death was filmed so savage that people had to cover themselves. The trick to achieve it turned RoboCop into a cult work

In 1987, the film director Paul Verhoeven gave a twist to action science fiction with RoboCop. In reality, that was a cocktail very much to the director’s liking where there was satire, cyberpunk and police thriller. The difference was that he did not limit himself to telling the fall and rebirth of a hero: he decided to win over the viewer with emotional hammer blows, with a death. so cruel and excessive that it was impossible to look at without feeling uncomfortable. The scene that changed everything. Alex Murphy, the protagonist, appears up to that point as a good cop thrown into a corrupt world, but the film doesn’t have time to build him up calmly, so it does it by the most brutal way: literally, it tear apart in front of the viewer so that, when he returns converted into a machine, he understands that what has been lost is not only flesh, but humanity. Verhoeven explained it with an almost religious and at the same time tremendously cynical idea: “if you want to resurrect Murphy as an all-powerful RoboCop, first you have to crucify him.” And that crucifixion, instead of being symbolic or elegant, is filmed like a physical nightmaredirty and painful, one designed so that the viewer cannot avoid the impact. The slaughter as a narrative. The sequence It is constructed like a public execution, with the criminals laughing in the background, and that is possibly the key to its violence: it is not just that it unlockis that along the way they humiliate him, turn him into a broken toy, and torture him as if the gang were enjoying the show. The scene is escalating until it seems impossiblewith the protagonist trying to understand what is happening to him while his body stops obeying him, and the band acting like real madmen. There is the moral trick of the director of RoboCop: The villains were absolutely grotesque, yes, but the film removes any sympathetic veneer from them and turns them into a total social menace. Thus, when the final shot arrives that puts an end to the execution, the viewer is no longer watching the typical “80s action” film, he is seeing the point of no return that makes the entire film, from that minute on, a story. of loss and revenge. The old school of effects. It is impossible to talk about this classic without mentioning what makes it unique. The how was filmed: no less than under the orders of the legendary Rob Bottin with an artisanal obsession that today seems unthinkable based on meticulously designed prostheses, molds, fake parts and physical tricks. In order for the mutilation to work without putting the actor at risk, a a fake hand From a real mold, it was reconstructed in fiberglass and divided into sections so that it could be “popped” with compressed air and stage blood without the need for explosives near the face. It wasn’t just an effect, it was a device home engineering: internal blood tubes, pressure control, parts that could be assembled and disassembled, and a repeatable explosion pattern to always nail the same result. “Death” was also filmed with a staging designed to hide the real and sell the fakewith raised floors, holes through which to put the real arm under the stage, and a member of the team moving from below a false arm attached with Velcro as if it were a living limb. The underground trick. Plus: Murphy’s death is supported by a secret choreography that the viewer never saw: operators out of shot, hidden mechanisms and an absurd number of hands working to make a second of screen seem like an organic nightmare. Not only that: a foam arm in disguise with a police uniform, a metal structure to hold it, hinges at the “elbow” and even a support anchored to the false floor so that everything could resist the violence of the effect. While the actor was dying and staggering above, below there was a team of professionals pumping blood by hand and adjusting compressed air. Even the shots that “break up” the armor were reinforced with simple but brilliant physical details, such as small charges of talcum powder to simulate fragmentation, a very cheap solution that, in camera, added texture and turned the scene into something tactile, with dust, impacts and material that seems to fall off the body. The Peter Weller doll. Another stroke of genius came with the moment of the auction: for a final shot that in the released version lasts a sigh, a Murphy’s full torsoa sophisticated doll with a latex face made from a mold of the actor, an internal fiberglass skull and mechanisms to move the neck, jaw and body. It was not a static mannequin, it was a creature manipulated by cablescapable of opening his mouth in a silent scream, leaning, trembling and reacting to the shot as if there was still life inside. The execution was designed so that the back of the head “jumped out” with a controlled explosionwith pieces pre-cut to break in a specific way and with the interior prepared with blood and soft fragments, so that the horror felt mechanical but compelling. In addition, the “sweat” detail was added with water sprayas if the doll was breathing for the last time, and a motor with vibration so that the body seems to tremble with fear, an almost obscene trick due to its human nature that returns to artifice. Censorship as an enemy. The most incredible thing is that, even so, what was seen in the rooms was a cropped version. RoboCop’s violence clashed head-on with the rating system of the time, and the film was given an X rating several times, forcing reedit, cut and sacrifice material until a commercially viable qualification is achieved. Paradoxically, the cut that helped save it was one that its own creators considered “shabby” or too obvious, the moment in which Murphy’s arm flies off pulled by a … Read more

Until now, launching satellites was the business. The US has just turned its exorbitant cost into a million-dollar opportunity

For years, the space business has revolved around a very specific idea: launch more satellites, faster and cheaper. The race to fill low Earth orbit with large constellations has skyrocketed demand and turned takeoff into a multibillion-dollar industry, but it has also brought to the table a problem that for a long time remained in the background: what to do with these satellites when they reach the end of their useful life and continue to take up space in orbit. In this context, the United States has taken a decisive step by promoting and beginning to materialize the exorbitant market. New business on the horizon. This step forward has already resulted in a concrete contract. Starfish Space has been awarded of an agreement valued at 52.5 million dollars by the Space Development Agency (SDA) of the United States Space Force to offer a service for deorbiting satellites at the end of their useful life. The assignment includes the development, launch and operation of the otter ship in low orbit intended to deorbit satellites of the PWSA when they are no longer operational, with a first operation and the possibility of carrying out several more. The launch is planned for 2027. behind the scenes. This shift cannot be understood without the economic context that has turned space into a high-volume industry. Global space launch services market reached $21.19 billion by 2025 and, according to estimates by Precedence Researchcould climb to 70,560 million in 2035, with a compound annual growth rate of 11.56%. A substantial portion of that revenue comes from continuous satellite deployment, driven by constellations that require frequent launches to maintain and renew their in-orbit networks. An increasingly saturated orbit. Having thousands of satellites operating at the same time is not only a question of deployment, but also of end-of-cycle management. Those responsible for large constellations must decide whether to deorbit their satellites relatively early to limit the risk of orbital debris or whether to keep them active for as long as possible to extract their full economic and operational value. This tension, without a simple solution, has become one of the main drivers that push us to search for new formulas to manage the end of life in orbit. What changes with “deorbit-as-a-service”. Starfish’s proposal is based on separating the end of life of the satellite from its design and daily operation, allowing an external spacecraft to be responsible for deorbiting without requiring prior modifications to the devices in orbit. The company maintains that this approach allows operators to maximize the useful life of their constellations and delegate the retirement of those satellites that cannot deorbit themselves. The previous step. Although the deorbit mission has not yet launched, Starfish Space comes to this point with a previous history of in-orbit demonstrations. The company launched Otter Pup 1 in June 2023 and managed to maneuver it to within 1,000 meters of a target ten months later, a relevant milestone for approach and control operations. In October, an Impulse Space Mira spacecraft used Starfish software to approach another spacecraft to within 1,250 meters, and in June 2025, Otter Pup 2 was launched with the goal of performing the first commercial docking of satellites in low orbit. The big question to answer. What is now being tested is whether satellite deorbiting can go from being an exception to becoming a recurring industrial practice. The expansion of constellations and the pressure to keep low orbit operational force us to look for solutions that do not depend solely on each individual satellite. In this context, the United States’ decision to contract this type of services offers a first sign of where the sector can evolve, although its real scope can only be measured when the first missions begin to operate. Images | Starfish Space In Xataka | Human beings have not set foot on the Moon for 54 years: the mission that aims to correct it has just entered its final phase

It’s called Sirius-82 and it has turned rivers into modern minefields

On a front where everything seems decided by trenches, artillery and drones In heaven, there’s another war going on moving in silenceclose to the water and away from the spotlights. The Dnieper River, turned into a natural border and lifeline, has been filled with small battles for islands and passes that can change the balance of an entire region. And in that fight, Russia has just introduced a novelty explosive. A river as a front. The war between Russia and Ukraine remains bogged down in a wear balancewith Ukrainian defenses slowing advances and much of the attention focused on Donetsk, but beneath that noise there is another battle less visible and very strategic: control of several islands in the Dnieper River. Ukraine dominates these islands and the western shore, while Russia controls the eastern shore and tries to seize them to facilitate assaults across the river and, in perspective, sustain operations that once again put places like Kherson at risk. On that river board, where each crossing is a potential suicide, technology appears again as the shortcut to gain margin without paying the human price. Sirius-82. The broadcast videos by the Russian Army show a new unmanned surface vehicle, Sirius-82which begins to operate in the Dnieper with a much more pragmatic than sophisticated approach. From what can be seen, it is compact, about two meters long, and is oriented towards short duration missionsprobably with electric and battery propulsion, which fits the river environment and quick round-trip tasks. It does not look like an advanced autonomous system, but rather an instrument of “useful warfare” built to work now, here and now, even if it is crude and limited. A YaRM Modular charging and FPV control. The design suggests modularity, with the ability to carry cargo on the deck and also within the hull, making it an adaptable platform to different missions without redesigning the vehicle from scratch. In one of the recordings you can clearly see how he has two YaRM anchored river minesweighing about 13 kilos each, placed on the deck and released by mechanical actuators that release them into the water. Control, furthermore, cannot be more “old school”: an operator directs it with a joystick like those of FPV drones and monitors the camera on a laptop, a simple recipe that reduces costs and speeds up deployment, but that in real combat may be enough. River mining: the trap. The first function shown is the placement of YaRM mines in shallow watera Soviet resource intended for rivers and canals, usually anchored just below the surface to threaten light vessels. Russia would use them to attack Ukrainian resupply boats moving towards the islands, which is precisely the weak point of any forward control on a river: maintaining supplies and rotations under fire. Ukraine, in turn, uses similar mines to stop or destroy Russian attempts at rapprochement, and the result is an environment in which the Dnieper ceases to be a natural barrier and becomes a dynamic minefield, where the risk is not on the horizon, but under water. Demining and sacrifices. The other side of Sirius-82 is that it can serve to clear mineswhich is just as important in a river war where each step requires opening a safe corridor. A video shows it as a sacrificial platform, advancing until it detonates a Ukrainian mine to clear a passage before a manned boat enters, a brutally logical concept if lives are put before material. Furthermore, it is mentioned a common Russian technique demining by explosive charges with delayed fuses launched at intervals to detonate nearby mines, and the Sirius-82 could do that job without exposing a crew in the middle of a river with no coverage. A type of solution that only requires repetition and the absence of remorse when losing the vehicle. Kamikaze attacks and assault support. Beyond mining, the system could be used like kamikaze drone against Ukrainian vessels, ramming them and detonating a charge on board to destroy both, taking advantage of their low profile and the discretion of electric propulsion. It is also suggested a more “logistical” use in support of assaults on the islands, carrying supplies or even evacuating wounded if it is adapted for larger loads, something that would fit with a positional combat where the islands function as small bridgeheads. All in all, the Sirius-82 does not seem like a superweapon, but rather a tool to win the daily battles on the front, where each box of ammunition and each water crossing decides more than a major offensive. The pattern of war. What the appearance of Sirius-82 reveals is a trend of which we have talked before: Russia and Ukraine are pushed by personnel shortages, casualties and a very long front to replace humans with machines in tasks where the risk is disproportionate. And the interesting thing is that this replacement does not necessarily come with advanced autonomy and latest generation sensors, but with “primitive” systems but perfectly functional, built quickly and with a clear objective. The underlying message is that modern warfare does not always reward the most sophisticated, but rather what can be mass produced and deployed, what is sacrificed without hesitation and what solves a specific problem this week. A river that is no longer geography. If you like, Sirius-82 is a symptom of how the Dnieper is transforming in a space of access denial on a tactical scale, where mines, drones and remote control They replace the classic patrols. It is small, cheap and expendable, but that is precisely why it is dangerous: it allows the river to be planted and cleaned with less human risk, and it maintains constant pressure on the islands that Ukraine controls. And the more these platforms become normalized, the more likely it is that river combat will evolve into a “micro-robot” war who decide the terrain meter by meter, until crossing the nation’s largest river is less a military maneuver and more a technological lottery. Image | Telegram In Xataka | Ukraine … Read more

The ultra-rich have turned it into their refuge

The ultra-rich of the world they are choosing Spain like a paradise for your dream homes. High-income people are increasingly opting for properties with views of the Mediterranean Sea, away from the hustle and bustle, with a temperate climate and legal certainty for your investments. In recent years, ultra-high net worth individuals (so-called UHNWIs) Ultra High Net Worth Individuals) have put Spain in their sights, catapulting the country to fourth place globally in demand for luxury properties, as revealed the report Private Office Market Report 2026 by the real estate agency Engel & Völkers in collaboration with the consulting firm Henley & Partners. Spain: preferred destination for millionaires. Spain has slipped in in fourth place in the world in demand for luxury homes, only behind Italy, France and the United Arab Emirates. The analysis carried out by 160 international advisors reveals that prices in the premium real estate segment rose in Spain (as in Italy) driven by the mediterranean lifestyle. In contrast, destinations such as France and Canada registered moderate decreases. According to data from a study by the luxury real estate platform LuxuryEstate.com collected through the specialized portal Funds Societythe interest of millionaires from all over the world in Spain is solid. 77% of searches for luxury properties come from foreign buyers, with the ultra-rich Germans standing out with 27% of the total, above the French (17%) and Americans (5%). This translates into a record of almost 93,000 luxury homes acquired by non-residents in 2024, consolidating Spain as a safe destination for investors in luxury properties. Reasons that attract fortunes. It’s no longer just about saving money: the rich want to live (even) better. The Engel & Völkers report highlights that more than 50% of international advisors highlight an increase in preference for destinations that invite people to live. outdoor life (such as gardens or terraces accompanied by temperate climates) as the main feature for selecting luxury properties. This figure rises to 69.5% for requests in Europe and 54.8% worldwide. Jawed Barna, CEO of Engel & Völkers, sees it clearly: these properties act as “lifestyle assets.” Hans Lenz, an advisor in Mallorca, tells how “we have a growing group of clients moving here thanks to the incredible climate, security, connectivity and schools, with 19 international schools in Mallorca.” The exemption from wealth tax of up to three million euros and the absence of inheritance tax in the Balearic Islands accelerate the arrival of wealthy families to the Balearic Islands, combining remote work with the beach and golf. Classic destinations. According what was published by IdealisticMadrid, the Balearic Islands and Marbella are the most common destinations for these wealthy buyers. In Marbella, 8,708 luxury transactions were closed in 2024, an increase of 5.64% year-on-year, with 92% in foreign hands such as Mexicans and Russians. These operations seek absolute privacy, panoramic views and luxury equipment such as infinity pools. Millionaires, along with Latinos, choose a formula that mixes the business potential of the destination with relaxation. When you clear the Neighborhoods like Salamanca in Madrid or Pedralbes in Barcelona They see apartments exceeding one million euros they pass to American and Latin American millionaires. In 2026 it will go further. According to data from the Engel & Völkers study, the luxury market in Spain generated 20,550 million euros in 2025, which represents a growth of 6.2% compared to the previous year, with Chinese tourists responsible for 20% of total spending in this segment. Stuart Siegel, of Engel & Völkers Americas, predicts that the rich will continue to invest in homes designed for long-term enjoyment, prioritizing quality of life over quick profits. For his part, Daniel Hadi, CEO of the real estate agency for the Middle East, warns that the lack of exclusive villas and mansions will drive up current property prices even more. Given this luxury housing shortagebuyers will begin to look towards Branded Residences from prestigious brands such as Four Seasons or Dorchester, equipped with private spas and other luxury services managed by brands. In Xataka | The sale of a mansion for 22 million euros has revealed a new reality: Sotogrande is the new Marbella Image | Unsplash (Norbert Buduczki)

How the Sinaloa Cartel turned the marble industry into its methamphetamine logistics center

If Walter White had exchanged the New Mexico desert for the Mediterranean coast, his story would not have been very different from what the National Police has just revealed. in the series Breaking Badthe Albuquerque chemist hid his money under the sand and used a car wash to launder his “blue empire.” On the other hand, in the province of Alicante, the setting has been a marble industrial warehouse, an armored underground bunker and a statue of Popeye that, instead of spinach, kept the purest “crystal” of the Sinaloa Cartel. As if it were a script by Vince Gilligan, “Operation Saga” has revealed that the largest methamphetamine network in Europe did not operate from marginal shadows, but from the heart of the marble industry between Novelda and Monforte del Cid. He Heisenberg From this plot he decided that the marble blocks were the perfect container for the desires to expand the empire that Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán one day founded. The end of “Operation Saga”. The National Police, in a strategic alliance with the US DEA, has put the final lock on an investigation that began in 2023. According to the official press releasethis second phase has culminated in the total dismantling of a Spanish-Mexican organization responsible for turning Spain into the main hub of methamphetamine from the mainland. If in May 2024 the first phase already left a record number of 1,800 kilos of drugs seized, this new coup has ended with nine key arrests. The operation has managed to decapitate the infrastructure that the Sinaloa Cartel had woven between Tenerife, Madrid, Valencia and Alicante. A popeye 40 kilos. The logistics of the network were as ingenious as they were sophisticated. According to local mediathe narcotic was traveling from Mexico hidden inside imposing marble stones that were legally imported. Once in Spain, the organization used the business structure of a well-known marble worker in the area to move the drugs. We found the most surreal example in July 2024. The police intercepted a statue of Popeye, five feet tall and in metallic colors, bound for Tenerife. Its base was not solid metal, but contained 40 kilos of methamphetamine. The recipient, a “historic drug trafficker” on the island, was waiting for the shipment without knowing that the figure had been under police surveillance for months. This seizure made it possible to confirm that, after the 2024 coup, the organization was trying desperately refinance. The bunker and the salary of silence. Civil engineering put at the service of crime reached its zenith in a Novelda warehouse. There, the agents They found an underground bunker hidden under a heavy steel plate and a large stone block, where almost 3,000,000 euros in cash were kept. While the money was accumulating in Alicante, in the Madrid neighborhood of Malasaña, the organization supported a member of the Sinaloa Cartel “in reserve”. This man lived in a semi-cloistered regime in an apartment from which he barely left. He received a salary of 2,500 euros per month exclusively in exchange for his silence, since he knew the details of the entry of the 1,800 kilos of the first phase. A global drug network. The logistics brain was not at street level. The leader of the drug transporters, a Spaniard with a record of crimes against property, coordinated movements between Mexico and Spain through criminal teleworking from Dubai. From there he supervised not only the glass, but also secondary shipments, such as a 38-kilo shipment of marijuana intercepted in Finland. But why Spain? The answer lies in waste science. a study about wastewater (analyzing metabolites in urine) is the definitive tool to measure actual consumption. Although the consumption of methamphetamine in Spain is lower than that of cocaine, EUDA studies place Spain and the Netherlands as distribution hubs. In areas like Euskadi, for example, records of amphetamines in wastewater already show peaks that are eighty times the national average, an unequivocal sign that the market is there. The end of one era (or the beginning of another). The operation, directed by the Investigative Court number 6 of the National Court, has also seized seven luxury watches, geolocation devices and ammunition. With this, the Police consider that the most powerful criminal network of synthetic drugs in Europe has been dismantled. However, as Commissioner Alberto Morales warnsSinaloa’s persistence is legendary. Since 2009 they have tried to settle in Spain in every possible way: from “Chapo’s” cousin detained in the Palace Hotel in 2012, to the drug laboratories of “Los Chapitos” dismantled in Toledo in 2024. Today the Novelda bunker is empty and Popeye rests in the Canillas police facilities, but the authorities are clear that the “European dream” of the Mexican cartels is far from over. Image | lifestyle.sustainability and freepik Xataka | There is a huge gap between what we think medical marijuana does and what it actually does.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.