Melania Trump triumphs at the inaugural balls with a two-tone dress and choker for history

The inauguration of Donald Trump as the 47th president of the United States has been accompanied by traditional events in which the first lady, Melania Trumphas surprised us again with its eclectic and unexpected style. This is how he showed us yesterday morning, January 20 during a mass, subsequent reception with Joe and Jill Biden, as well as an oath in the Capitol Rotunda in Washington DC However, we still had to know what it would be like her gala dress to participate in the inaugural balls that closed this historic day of great international significance. © Getty Images © Getty Images © Getty Images © GTRES © Getty Images © Getty Images A two-tone dress for the big party of 2025 Specifically, for these musical celebrations, Melania Trump has once again trusted her great friend and stylist, the Frenchman Hervé Pierre. She wears a fabulous white dress that fits her figure and has a contrasting black band in relief that runs along the silhouette in an elegant zigzag that begins on the chest and ends at the bottom of a skirt that has a side slit. As accessories, the First Lady of the United States wears matching pumps and an original choker that hugs her throat and has a floral-shaped diamond brooch. © Getty Images © Getty Images Her dress for the inaugural ball in 2017 On January 20, 2017, that is, 7 years ago, Donald Trunp was inaugurated for the first time as president of the United States. That day, Melania Trump, who was making her debut as first lady, attended the traditional inaugural ball in a fabulous vanilla-colored shift dress signed by her close friend, the designer Hervé Pierre. The piece featured a Bardot neckline with delicate ruffles that fell down the side of the design. © Getty Images © Getty Images © Getty Images © Getty Images Melania Trump’s look at the inauguration For her part, for the first events on January 20, 2025, Melania Trump surprised with her look of great aesthetic drama. For the occasion, the newly minted First Lady of the United States wore a sober double-breasted coat in navy blue that signed the American designer originally from Buffalo Adeam Lippeswhose fashion is characterized by “timeless, elegant designs and impeccable craftsmanship,” as stated on the brand’s official website. Furthermore, and creating a halo of mystery on his face, he partially hid his gaze with a hat type pamela or boater in two-tone finish, by Eric Javits. As for footwear, Spanish fashion accompanied him in this choice, as he opted for some salons by the canary Manolo Blahnikin which he has trusted on numerous occasions. This has been the inauguration of Donald Trump

Ivanka Trump dazzles with her most ‘royal’ look in the purest style of Queen Letizia

After dazzling, literally, with a dress studded with crystals and pearls by Oscar de la Renta which was premiered at the dinner prior to the inauguration of Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump She was one of the most anticipated guests for her father’s big day, his inauguration as the 47th president of the United States. Considered one of the most elegant women in the family, her choice has done justice to the rumors that have been stalking her for weeks: she is a style reference. And here is the latest example with its look inspired by the 50s during this historic morning, prior to the inaugural balls of the night. © Getty Images © Getty Images © Getty ImagesEric Trump, Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. Together with her husband, Jared Kushner, and her brothers, Eric and Donald Junior, she has put the finishing touch on elegance with her impeccable green French seal look in the religious ceremony held hours before the big event at St. John’s Church in Washington. Away from the white Oscar de la Renta suit that she wore at her father’s first appointment, back in 2017, this time she has opted for the color related to hope. Is she sending an indirect message to the world? Or is it just a nice coincidence? © Getty ImagesIvanka Trump arrives at the ceremony with one of her children © Getty Images © Getty Images For this occasion that will be written in the history books, the American businesswoman, socialite, model and politician has achieved the title of best dressed at the great event that has brought together some of the most powerful names on the planet, despite the fact that the The president’s wife, Melanie Trump, has gone viral with her headdress. Without a doubt, Ivanka has impeccable taste and her sophisticated two-piece styling affirms it, and this time it is the work of Italian designer Maria Grazia Chiuri for the couture house Diorwho once again has triumphed with her feminine and acclaimed cut New Look that marked a before and after in the women’s wardrobe. © Getty Images There are those who claim that the family that lives in the White House is considered in the country as if they were authentic princes and princesses, as if blue blood ran through their veins. And coincidentally, the outfit that our protagonist of the day has worn hides a wonderful certain wink royal European that has fascinated us, keep reading to find out. © Getty Images Composed of a lightly draped wrap-around side cape jacket that wraps her figure in a delicate way, enhancing the waist and a thin black leather belt that unifies, she has completed it with a matching sweater with rounded neck made in knit and a skirt midi that fits your curves. She was gorgeous! This set was inspired by the design FavoriAH1950 that Christian Dior created. And one of the details that has caught our attention the most, in addition to the legendary bag Lady Dior in black, the leather gloves, the tight stockings and the very high stiletto heels, has been the impeccable choice of her touched. © GTRES There are very few times in which we have seen him wear this very photogenic accessory at public events, and for this renowned event he has not hesitated to do it again. Trump’s eldest daughter has opted for the timeless design that princesses and queens adore, one in the shape of a cap in the same green tone which fits perfectly for daytime events. Thanks to him he has managed to transmit that aura royal so special, what was it inspired by? We remember the occasions when the reina Letizia, Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and Beatrice Borromeo They did the same as her. Who have you been inspired by? © Getty Images © Getty Images Queen Letizia At the end of March 2022, the Queen Letizia came to the tribute of the first anniversary of the death of Elizabeth II’s husband, the Duke at Westminster Abbey, sheathed in a very look british: a tobrigo as a dress and headdress, everything at bottle green An artisanal design tailored to the brand Baleldirected by the Spanish designer and founder Isabel Terroso. © GTRES Kate Middleton On the part of Kate Middletonthe future queen of England, appeared last Christmas on her way to the traditional Sandringham Christmas Day Mass with the same style strategy, a long coat which acted as a dress. In its case, signed by one of its leading fashion houses, Alexander McQueenand Gina Foster’s original headdress that premiered on St. Patrick’s Day in 2014. © Getty Images © Getty Images Meghan Markle Although in a clearer version, we find this commented green look Meghan Markle which she wore at the mass on the occasion of Commonwealth Day 2020. This is how she said goodbye to her time as the Duchess of Sussex, clad in a striking midi dress with a fitted body, long sleeves and a pencil skirt with a cut at the waist and strategic stitching from Emilia Wickstead, without forgetting the asymmetrical cape and the cap with a net, the work of William Chambers. © GTRES © GTRES Beatrice Borromeo The most recent wink is found in the Italian’s closet Beatrice Borromeo. This is how spectacular Prince Pierre Casiraghi’s wife posed during the Monaco Day event in 2024, wearing a heather gray two-piece from the house Dior, with a cap-type headdress and built-in hairnet. Tiffany Trump’s look Tiffany Trumpthe fourth daughter of the president of the United States who was born from his relationship with his second wife, Marla Maple, has also monopolized the spotlight. Accompanied by her husband, the Lebanese-American businessman Michael Boulos, she accompanied her father at the inauguration. A great date marked on the family calendar in which a new elegant navy blue velvet coat with contrast trim and pronounced shoulder pads that contrasted perfectly with her long wavy blonde hair. © Getty Images © Getty Images

The incredible Usha Vance dress with which Melania Trump has dazzled

The inauguration of Donald Trump As the 47th president of the United States, he has left countless images and anecdotes to remember, including the looks of two of the most anticipated guests. His wife and first lady, Melania Trump opted first for a striking hatwhich was much commented on, and which was later replaced by a two-tone dress and choker at the inaugural balls. Ivanka Trump, considered one of the most elegant women in the family, opted for a green design of marked inspiration royal which gave way to a dress that paid tribute to Audrey Hepburn. But one of the big surprises of yesterday was Usha Vance, wife of JD Vance, current vice president of the countrywho surprised with his choices for the events. © Getty Images A bespoke design by Oscar de la Renta The second lady of the United States knew that her outfits were going to be analyzed in detail and her choices did not go unnoticed even though, at first, all eyes were directed at the women of the Trump family. And if we had already said that Ivanka’s choice had certain similarities with the designs that Queen Letizia or the Princess of Wales usually wear at some of their most important events, Usha Vance’s, too. © Getty Images © Getty Images The American lawyer opted for a custom design created by Oscar de la Renta. It was a structured coat in a soft pink tone with a high collar and cinched waist with a belt that makes us think of the coat-dresses that conquer women time and time again. royals. Under this was a dress of the same tone, with a round neck, and also slightly fitted in the waist area. She completed the look with tall suede boots in a much paler pink that contrasted the color of the main garment. To finish the look, she carried a small handbag in a neutral tone and some striking floral earrings that were very visible thanks to the fact that her hair was tied up. © Getty Images A beaded dress for the inaugural balls It is a tradition that at nightfall, after the inauguration, we eat the traditional presidential dance. It is a moment of celebration in which attendees choose designs typical of any red carpet. That’s what they did not only Melania and Ivanka Trump with her designs with black and white as protagonistsalso Usha Vance who opted for a dress studded with rhinestones and created by one of the most internationally recognized bridal and guest brands: Reem Acra. © Getty Images © Getty Images The Lebanese designer launched her eponymous brand in 1997 and has since become a reference in bridal fashion, dressing celebrities such as Jennifer Lopez, Taylor Swift and Halle Berry on red carpets and important events. That is why we are not surprised that, for an event of such magnitude, the second lady opted for one of her creations. Specifically, it deals with a gala design that was part of its Pre Fall 2024 collectiona semi-transparent chiffon dress, embroidered with paillettes and sequins and in a shade of blue that is known by the nickname of blue royalsince it is one of the colors that most frequently sneaks into the choices of royal women. This garment, with a false strapless neckline, has a corseted bodice and an A-line skirt that extends to the floor. © Getty Images The story of Usha and JD Vance Usha made history this Monday by becoming the first indian american second lady. She and the vice president, who They met at Law School.they have been married since 2014 and boast a solid marriage. It was during the 2024 Republican National convention that he said JD Vance was “the most determined person I’ve ever met, with one overriding ambition: to become a husband and father and build the kind of close-knit family he had longed for as a child. My background is very different from JD’s. I grew up in San Diego, in a middle-class community with two loving parents, both immigrants from India, and a wonderful sister. The fact that JD and I were able to meet, fall in love, and get married is a testament to this great country. It is also a testament to JD. And it tells you something about who he is.”

Trump has made it very clear that he wants to conquer Mars. Now NASA has the enormous problem of not being called SpaceX

Trump made just one space promise during his inauguration speech, but it was no small feat. The Martian dream. Between cheers and jumps of enthusiasm of Elon Musk, Donald Trump pointed out Mars as new “manifest destiny” of the United States. The newly inaugurated president promised to take astronauts to the Red Planet and plant the American flag in Martian soil. Trump stated: “We will pursue our manifest destiny to the stars, launching American astronauts to plant the flag on the planet Mars.” His words are not coincidental and have a clear influence, but they seem to mark a change of priorities for NASA that leaves the future of the Artemis lunar program. The influence of Elon Musk. “We’re going straight to Mars, the Moon is a distraction,” wrote the CEO of SpaceX two weeks ago. No one quite understood the scope of that tweet, since SpaceX has a very important contract with NASA to build the lander for the Artemis III and IV lunar missions, but now that message resonates on Capitol Hill. There, President Trump focused on Mars. It could just be a rhetorical statement (slowly, but surely, we have to get to Mars before China does), but with Elon Musk as a key ally, the new government could really be preparing a radical shift in astronautics strategy. The current Artemis program. It was precisely Trump’s first term that shaped NASA’s current lunar program. The then administrator, Jim Bridenstine, managed to put the United States’ return to the Moon on track with an architecture that combined NASA’s internal developments (the SLS rocket and the Orion spacecraft) with commercial spacecraft from private companies (SpaceX’s Starship HLS and the lunar module Blue Moon by Blue Origin). In turn, Bridenstine promoted a series of unmanned lunar missions and the creation of the Artemis Accordswhich already has 53 signatory countries, for international cooperation in future missions to the Moon, including the construction of a lunar base, the commercial exploitation of the satellite and everything that comes after (Mars, comets and asteroids). The Moon is a cruel lover. Artemis is not at her best. Manned missions have been delayed for problems on the Orion ship and delays in Starship development. Furthermore, the insane cost overruns of the SLS rocket have put a good part of public opinion against the current architecture of the program, which could be reconfigured with the support of SpaceX’s new Starship and Blue Origin’s New Glenn rockets. To make matters worse, the first two commercial missions associated with Artemis (CLPS‑1 and CLPS‑2) failed to reach the Moon or lie down when landing on the moonwhich has precipitated the cancellation of other more important missions such as NASA’s VIPER rover. But until Trump’s speech, there was nothing to predict that the Artemis program would be in danger. Is it really? From the Moon to Mars. Until now, NASA’s plan was to establish itself on the Moon throughout this decade and the next (or at least in the Gateway lunar station in orbit with the satellite) to prepare for the jump to Mars in the 2040s. Prioritize the Red Planet I would leave three scenarios to the foreseeable new administrator from NASA, Jared Isaacman: A reduced lunar program, without aspirations to create a large lunar base like the one proposed by the ILRS program led by China. Thus, the United States would continue in the race to put the first woman on the moon without stopping to focus on Mars. In exchange, he would cede lunar land to his opponents A bifurcated program with parallel lunar and Martian missions that do not throw away everything that has been developed so far. It would be the logical step if NASA’s budget were unlimited, but with the huge investment what the lunar program entails, adding a Martian program seems impossible A total redirection to the conquest of Mars. Following Elon Musk’s vision: the Moon is a distraction from the ultimate goal of become a multiplanetary civilization. Even with a majority in Congress, it is the option in which giants such as Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and even New Space lose (Blue Origin has several lunar contracts). It seems complicated for congressmen to agree on a clean slate, but it is not totally impossible How would the United States get to Mars? There would be a public tender, but one option immediately comes to mind. NASA could adopt the SpaceX Mars program as your own. Elon Musk said SpaceX planned to launch five uncrewed Starships to Mars in 2026 and, if they managed to land, the first crewed mission to Mars in history in 2028. The experts agree at a crucial point: a mission with astronauts to Mars in the next four years is technically impossible if it is to be done with guarantees, since the scientific and technological challenges are monumental. But there were also many people convinced that Trump would not win the election again while Musk bet money that yes I would. Image | The White House, NASA In Xataka | Artemis has entered into crisis: NASA remains silent about the Orion spacecraft and rumors of cancellation of the SLS grow

Ivanka Trump follows in Kate Middleton’s style footsteps

On January 20, Donald Trump was inaugurated as the 47th president of the United States during a institutional act which several followed inaugural balls. In these acts, fashion played an important role and, among the looks that stood out, we can highlight those of her eldest daughter, Ivanka Trump; above all, because there is an anecdotal detail in both: they remember outfits that Kate Middleton already wore. In this gallery, we will remember all the times he has connected with the Princess of Wales’s closet. 110 © Dior © Getty Images A green look with a headdress during the investiture For the morning of January 20, 2025, during the inauguration of Donald Trump as president of the United States, Ivanka opted for a fabulous green outfit from the house of Dior, which took the design as a reference FavoriAH1950 that Christian Dior created in the 1950s. However, it didn’t take us long to see that his choice for that historic day It reminded us of the tastes of the realza and, among them, those who have defined the image of Kate Middleton. In the image, we can see the current Princess of Wales with a very similar LK Bennett look that she wore during her visit to Leicester on March 8, 2012. On the other hand, both also connected by accompanying her image with an elegant headdress. 210 © Getty Images © Getty Images In white and with black opera gloves Ivanka Trump opted for a bridal aesthetic to attend one of the inaugural balls on the night of January 20, 2025. Specifically, she wore a nostalgic recreation of the Givenchy dress that actress Audrey Hepburn showed in the film Sabrina (1954). However, on this occasion, it was very difficult not to think about Kate Middleton, since she also chose a white dress for one of her most impressive red carpet looks: her choice in silk chiffon and satin by Alexander McQueen to attend the 2023 BAFTA Awards. Magnifying this anecdotal connection, the eldest daughter of the president of the United States also accompanied her image with long black opera gloves. 310 © ivankatrump / munozphotography © Getty Images A brilliant party choice, by Jenny Packham However, the inaugural ball was not the only time Ivanka Trump reminded us of Kate Middleton with a red carpet-worthy dress. For example, for the bat mitzvah from his daughter Arabellathe businesswoman opted for a creation filled with sequins and front draping by Jenny Packham. From this designer and with a very similar pattern, it was also the stunning model worn by the Princess of Wales at the world premiere of No time to die on September 28, 2021 at the Royal Albert Hall in London. 410 © Getty Images © Getty Images With long beige coat The day before Donald Trump’s inauguration (January 19, 2025), Ivanka participated in a wreath laying at Arlington National Cemetery, Virginia. That day, she unified her look signed by Oscar de la Renta with the color beige, including an elegant long coat and a turtleneck sweater. Kate Middleton also liked these details, who looked very similar during her official visit to Scarborough on November 3, 2022. Specifically, she was wearing a Max&Co coat. 510 © GTRES © Getty Images They have the viral dress from Meghan Markle’s wedding The navy blue dress with white polka dots and contrasting cuffs and collar worn by actress Abigail Spencer at the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle it turnedl. This creation by Alessandra Rich (Spring/Summer 2018 collection), which is inspired by an iconic photograph by Alfred Eisenstaedt, appears in both of their wardrobes. Ivanka Trump chose him to participate in a panel discussion at Northeast Iowa Community College in Peostta in July 2018. For her part, Kate Middleton premiered him for an official portrait on the occasion of the 70th birthday of the current King Charles III in November 2018. Subsequently, I would get it back in Milton Keynesnorth London, on May 14, 2019. 610 © Getty Images © Getty Images The dress Denvella by Emilia Wickstead Both also share the same white dress with black detail arranged in a linear fashion, by Emilia Wickstead. In the case of Ivanka Trump, she wore this flattering creation during her institutional commitments at the Capitol on June 25, 2019. For her part, Kate Middleton has worn it only once: during a Polo match in Windsor on July 6, 2022. Prince William’s wife chose to wear it without the wide belt that accompanies this model, named Denvella. 710 © Getty Images © Getty Images A red coat with volumes at the neckline For the religious service held on January 21, 2025 at the Washington National Cathedral in Washington DC, Ivanka Trump chose to wear a red Suzannah London coat that, inevitably, is reminiscent of the design with a bow on the chest (by Catherine Walker) that Kate Middleton chose to attend the pre-Christmas concert held at Westminster Abbey from London on December 8, 2021. It was accompanied by sapphire earrings from the Queen Mother. 810 © Getty Images © Getty Images A monochrome look in white and with a suit Ivanka Trump attended a United Nations meeting in New York on September 24, 2019. That day, she opted for a completely white look, in which her suit jacket with original lapels stood out. Her choice connects with the style that Kate Middleton wore during the Commonwealth Games in Birmingham on August 2, 2022. The one in royal British era of Alexander McQueen. 910 © Getty Images © Getty Images The power of the red suit A powerful choice is a red suit, a bet that Queen Letizia especially likes. Kate Middleton has also relied on this trend on several occasions, such as when she wore an Alexander McQueen tailor to attend an event in support of children in London on January 30, 2023. For her part, Ivanka Trump defined her image with a very similar garment in Tampa (Florida) on July 31, … Read more

Trump, implacable in Davos: demands less fiscal burden on the EU, a drop in oil to Arabia and more than doubling military spending in countries like Spain

Historic speech by the new president of the United States, Donald Trump, in his telematic speech before the auditorium of the World Economic Forum in Davos. Trump has surpassed…

Judge hears lawsuit over Trump’s order to cancel birthright citizenship

A federal judge in Seattle will hear first arguments Thursday in a lawsuit filed by several states seeking to block President Donald Trump’s executive order ending the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship regardless of parents’ immigration status. Federal Judge John Coughenour scheduled the session to consider the request from Arizona, Illinois, Oregon and Washington. The case is one of five lawsuits brought by 22 states and several immigrant advocacy groups across the country. The lawsuits include personal testimony from prosecutors who are U.S. citizens by birthright, and names of pregnant women who fear their children will not become U.S. citizens. The order signed by Trump on the day of his inauguration is scheduled to go into effect on February 19. It could affect thousands of people born in the country, according to one of the lawsuits. In 2022, there were approximately 255,000 births of citizen children to mothers living in the country illegally and approximately 153,000 births to both parents in such a situation, according to the lawsuit filed by the four states in Seattle. The United States is among about 30 countries where birthright citizenship, the principle of jus soli or “right of the soil,” applies. Most are in the American Continent, including Canada and Mexico. The lawsuits argue that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees citizenship to people born and naturalized in the country and states have interpreted the amendment that way for a century. Ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, the amendment reads: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State in which they reside.” Trump’s order affirms that children of non-Americans are not subject to US jurisdiction and directs federal agencies not to recognize citizenship for children who do not have at least one parent who is a citizen. A key case on the issue unfolded in 1898. The Supreme Court held that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrants, was a U.S. citizen because he was born in the country. After a trip abroad, he faced denial of reentry by the federal government on the grounds that he was not a citizen under the Chinese Exclusion Act. But some advocates of immigration restrictions have argued that that case clearly applied to children born to parents who were both legal immigrants. They say it is less clear whether it applies to children born to parents who do not have a residence permit. Trump’s executive order prompted attorneys general to share their personal connections to birthright citizenship. For example, Connecticut state Attorney General William Tong, a birthright U.S. citizen and the nation’s first elected Chinese American attorney general, said the lawsuit was personal to him. “There is no legitimate legal debate on this issue. But the fact that Trump is completely wrong will not stop him from causing serious harm right now to American families like mine,” Tong said this week. One of the lawsuits includes the case of a pregnant woman, identified as “Carmen,” who is not a citizen, but has lived in the United States for more than 15 years and has a pending visa application that could give her permanent residency status. “Depriving children of the ‘priceless treasure’ of citizenship is a serious injury,” the lawsuit says. “It denies them the full membership in American society to which they are entitled.”

Trump orders oil drilling in Arctic reserve

He Donald Trump’s inauguration speech Last January 20 was full of controversies. Not only for the blunders on scientific topics that caused a stir in New Zealand. Also because he announced measures that make clear the drift that his dangerous environmental policies. For example, he made it very clear that he thinks open the Arctic to drilling in search of oil and other fossil fuels. Until now, the Arctic wildlife reserve, located in Alaska, had remained closed to drilling by order of Joe Biden. The last president had denied several exploitation permits in this protected area. However, the new president has already shown on many occasions how little he cares about the planet, so it was not going to be any less this time. “Drill, baby drill”. With this slogan, first used in 2008 by the former Republican lieutenant governor of the state of Maryland Michael SteeleDonald Trump has signaled his intentions in his inauguration speech. But what will be the consequences if drilling in these Alaskan territories finally restarts? American environmental groups have not been waiting to launch their answer to this question. Without a doubt, it is not good at all. There is only hope that, as have already shown on some other occasionfuel extraction companies show disinterest in this area of ​​the Arctic. It doesn’t matter how much Donald Trump opens the doors of the reservation. If the big oil companies refuse to extract fuel from there, there is little else they can do. I hope that’s the case. This is the reserve that Donald Trump wants to drill According to data from 2024it is estimated that beneath the soil of Alaska there is an amount of oil equivalent to 450-800 million barrels. Most of this territory is open to exploitation. However, there is an area of 78,000 square kilometers located on the northern slope of Alaska where, until now, it was strictly prohibited. It is about the Attic National Wildlife Refuge, known to some people like him United States Serengetidue to the great biodiversity that exists in it. It is one of the most intact and virgin of said country and it is estimated that approximately more than 200 species of birds, 42 species of fish and 45 species of mammals. Animals such as polar, brown and black bears, moose, caribou, wolves, lynxes, eagles, martens and beavers stand out. Its caribou population stands out especially, with more than 120,000 specimens. In his speech, Donald Trump has used the slogan “drill, baby, drill.” The Refuge was established in 1960 by President Dwight Eisenhower. Although it belonged to the American Republican Party, over time it has been the Democrats who have put the most effort into protecting the Refuge. Joe Biden also suspended drilling permits established in this region, in order to protect it even more. But Donald Trump has taken it upon himself to annul this suspension and announce his commitment to “drill, baby, drill“(“drill” means “to pierce” in English). What do environmentalists say? Both environmentalists and Alaska Native groups have expressed concern about the first decisions made by Donald Trump. Carol Holleythe lawyer and manager of the Earthjustice group, recalled in a statement that “Alaska is warming up four times faster than the rest of the planet.” This, he added, is “a trend that is wreaking havoc on communities, ecosystems, fish, wildlife and ways of life that depend on healthy lands and waters.” Logically, drilling the ground to extract oil and natural gas is the last thing needed to have healthy lands and waters. There is a large population of caribou in the refuge. Credit: Danielle Brigida (Wikimedia Commons) For Donald Trump, this is a decision that will bring economic prosperity to the United States, but it is not all about money. There is no United States without a planet and, with measures like this, little by little the stones are being laid to build an uninhabitable planet.

Trump’s deportation campaign begins: day laborers arrested at work arrive in Mexico

TIJUANA, Mexico . — Mexican day laborers detained while working began to be deported to Mexico while at various points on the border with the United States the construction of new spaces to house migrants and face the mass deportations announced by Donald Trump was accelerated. About 70 deportees in what could be some of the first raids of the new U.S. administration arrived in Tijuana in small groups over about three hours Tuesday night, some dressed in work clothes carrying orange bags with their belongings. Migrants who were deported from the United States to Mexico wave as they are transported to a shelter as they cross the El Chaparral pedestrian border bridge in Tijuana, Mexico, on the evening of Tuesday, January 21, 2025. (Felix Marquez/AP) As a man shouted from a distance to a small group of journalists, they were detained on Tuesday while they were working as day laborers in Denver, Colorado. Another migrant said he had been arrested in Oregon without giving further details. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum confirmed on Wednesday that there were returns the day before and, without specifying, indicated that the numbers were lower than usual. In 2024, according to official data, more than 500 Mexicans were deported daily on average along the entire border. This month, through one point alone, Nogales, on the border with Arizona, about 150 were deported daily, according to data from the Kino Initiative shelters. On an empty lot next to the border in Ciudad Juárez, next to El Paso, workers used cranes to erect large metal structures that would later become shelters. In Nogales, sports centers were set up to serve migrants. In Matamoros, spaces were expanded in shelters already operating and to the south of Piedras Negras the authorities announced that they wanted to enable empty industrial warehouses for the same purpose. Sheinbaum said Wednesday that the nine federal centers located in municipalities adjacent to the 11 official people repatriation points would be ready in three or four days. The president emphasized that formal conversations with the new US administration have also begun with a call between Mexican Foreign Minister Juan Ramón de la Fuente and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday. “It was a very good conversation, very cordial, they talked about migration issues, security issues,” Sheinbaum said without giving more details. In addition to the nine new centers, the federal government plans to use some existing ones in Tijuana, Ciudad Juárez and Matamoros where, as explained by Ariadna Montiel, Secretary of Welfare, foreigners who had an appointment to request asylum in the United States but who were canceled when Trump paralyzed the CBPOne virtual application. However, Sheinbaum has insisted that Mexico’s objective with foreigners, both those who were waiting for an appointment and those who are returned due to the reinstatement of the “Remain in Mexico” program – which returns asylum seekers while they wait for their hearing in court Americans—is to first give them humanitarian care and then return them to their countries voluntarily.

US House approves immigration detention law that could be the first that Trump enacts

The US House of Representatives on Wednesday gave final approval to a bill that requires the detention of migrants who are in the country without permission and who have been accused of theft and violent crimes, the first measure that President Donald Trump can enact it, after Congress—with some bipartisan support—moved quickly in line with the president’s plans to toughen measures against illegal immigration. The passage of the Laken Riley Act, named after a Georgia nursing student who was murdered last year by a Venezuelan, shows how dramatically the political debate over immigration has shifted to the right following Trump’s election victory. . Immigration policy has often been one of the most entrenched issues in Congress, but a crucial group of 46 politically vulnerable Democrats joined Republicans to pass the strict proposal by a vote count of 263 in favor and 156 against. . “For decades, it has been nearly impossible for our government to agree on solutions to problems at our border and within our country,” said Republican Senator Katie Britt. He noted that it is likely to be the “most significant immigration bill” that Congress has passed in nearly three decades. However, the bill will require a massive increase in the capabilities of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), but does not include any new funding. Meanwhile, the new president has issued a series of executive orders aimed at sealing the border with Mexico to immigration and ultimately deporting millions of migrants who lack permanent legal status in the United States. On Wednesday, Trump also canceled refugee resettlement and his administration has said it intends to prosecute local law enforcement officials who do not comply with his new immigration policies. Republican congressional leaders have made clear that they intend to follow the same path, although their biggest challenge will be finding a way to approve funding to actually implement Trump’s strict plans. “What he’s doing is starting what will ultimately be our legislative agenda,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson. House Republicans initially passed the legislation last year with the support of 37 Democrats in a move intended as a political rebuke to then-President Joe Biden’s handling of the southern border. He then languished in the Democratic-controlled Senate. This year, Republicans, now in control of both houses of Congress, have made this their top priority. When it came before the Senate, 12 Democrats voted in favor of the measure, and when the House voted on a version of the bill earlier this month, 48 Democrats supported it. A majority of adults in the United States favor deporting immigrants convicted of violent crimes, according to a recent poll by the NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and The Associated Press. However, only about 37% of U.S. adults favor deporting migrants in the country illegally who have not been convicted of a crime. “While the bill is not perfect, it sends a clear message that we think criminals should be deported,” said Rep. Tom Suozzi, a New York Democrat who has urged his party to support stricter enforcement of the law. immigration law. Under the bill, federal authorities would be required to detain any migrant arrested or charged with crimes such as shoplifting. The scope of the proposal was expanded in the Senate to also include those accused of assaulting a police officer or crimes that injure or cause the death of someone. The bill also gives state attorneys general standing to sue the federal government for damages caused by federal immigration decisions. This gives states new power in immigration policy when they have already been trying to counter presidential decisions under the Trump and Biden administrations. Democrats unsuccessfully tried to have that provision removed from the bill in the Senate, saying it would inject even more uncertainty and partisanship into immigration policy. Ultimately, even the Trump administration will likely struggle to implement the new requirements unless Congress follows up later this year with funding. Republicans are currently planning how to push their priorities through Congress through a party-line process known as budget reconciliation. They have estimated the cost of funding Trump’s border and deportation priorities at approximately $100 billion. Trump has “established the largest domestic logistics undertaking of our lifetimes, which is the deportation of the majority of aliens who are in the United States illegally,” said Ken Cuccinelli, who led U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services during the Trump’s first term, to a Senate panel recently. Cuccinelli noted that it would require an increase in immigration judges, prosecutors and other staff, but Trump has also paved the way for using military assets, bases and other resources to carry out mass deportations. The Department of Homeland Security has estimated that the Laken Riley Act would cost $26.9 billion in the first year to implement, including an increase of 110,000 ICE detention beds. Most Democrats criticized the lack of funding in the bill as evidence that it is a piecemeal approach that would do little to fix problems in the immigration system but would burden federal authorities with new requirements. “The authors of the bill stated that it would result in the arrest and detention of dangerous criminals, but it will not because it is a completely unfunded mandate,” said Democratic Senator Chris Murphy. Others expressed concerns that the bill would deprive migrants, including minors or beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, of due process rights. Senator Alex Padilla said federal authorities would now be forced to prioritize detaining migrants arrested for minor crimes such as shoplifting, rather than those who commit serious crimes. Overall, there is no evidence that migrants are more likely to commit violent crimes. Several studies have found that immigrants commit crimes at lower rates than those born in the United States. Groups that advocate for restrictive immigration policies dispute or dismiss those findings. But Republicans pointed to the bill’s namesake, Laken Riley, and how she was murdered by a Venezuelan migrant who had previously been arrested by local authorities but released while his … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.