Google

Google and Apple have been wanting to kill SMS for years. So they have signed peace between their messaging apps

by

Apple and Google have been betting on their own protocols for years RCS messaging. Relevant solutions in territories like the United States, but that do not fully penetrate the rest of the world. Despite this, both companies have closed an important agreement, so that when chatting from an Android to an iPhone the communication is encrypted. The novelty. Google has announced an agreement with Apple to implement end-to-end encryption for RCSensuring that chats between Android and iOS are secure by default. Although both systems had encrypted device-to-device communication (Android to Android and iPhone to iPhone), this security measure did not apply when we communicated with a different operating system. Why is it important. From now on, if you are looking for a safe way to communicate without going through applications like WhatsApp or Telegram, use the native Messages app (have an iPhone or have an Android) is an excellent option. There is no need to download anything, files can be shared, and the information does not pass through the hands of anyone other than Apple or Google. It is not the perfect solution for those looking for absolute anonymity, but it is a great plan to do without giants like Meta. What is RCS?. RCS stands for “Rich Communication Service”. It is a protocol that came to succeed SMS, and allows communication to be carried out in an encrypted and fast way. Being a protocol and not an app, developers need to create them to use RCS. In the case of Google it is the Messages app and, on iOS, too. When you send a message via RCS, it goes through our operator’s server, and from there to a server certified by the GSMA. It allows you to send images and videos of up to 10 MB and, most importantly, it does not require an internet connection to work. SMS vibes. Why it fails. Apple and Google’s efforts with RCS have to do with a phenomenon that has been happening for years in the US: the overwhelming success of the iPhone and iMessage. In the United States, iMessage is used more than WhatsAppsomething unthinkable in our country. Spain is the country of absolute dominance of WhatsApp, with Apple representing just over 10% of the market share and making it impossible for iMessage to be a rival for the Meta app. Why will he still be alive?. Google, despite controlling 70% of the mobile market with Android, needs a direct way for its users to communicate. And that way is RCS. Apple was forced to adopt it due to European pressure and, although it may not be a massive protocol, it is a key alternative to rival services. Be that as it may, good news for those who want alternatives to WhatsApp or Telegram when communicating from one mobile phone to another without the need for a network connection. In Xataka | Meta will pay $1.4 billion to Texas for violating the privacy of its users. Used facial recognition without permission

Europe has been depending on Amazon, Google and Microsoft for its most critical data for years. You are about to cut off their access

by

The European Commission is taking action. This organization is expected to present its “Technological Sovereignty Package” on May 27. This directive will include a series of measures aimed at boosting the EU’s strategic autonomy in sensitive areas, and that means something unique: stopping depending as much as possible on US hyperscalers to store critical data. The fear of the off button. The measures are being applied due to growing political instability and some recent cases that have demonstrated the power that the US has over the European technological infrastructure. In May Microsoft “cancelled” the email of Karim Khan, a prosecutor who had been directly cited in an executive order from Donald Trump. Microsoft he denied itbut the damage had already been done, and these problems have raised fears that Trump could use a kind of “off button” against European institutions that depend on the hardware and software infrastructure provided by companies like Microsoft, Google or Amazon. Legal espionage. The CLOUD Act (Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act) is a 2018 US law that allows law enforcement to force US-based technology companies (such as Google, Microsoft or Amazon) to provide data, regardless of where it is stored, whether inside or outside the United States. This law updates the Stored Communications Act to prioritize data control over its location. Or what is the same: if you use the services of US hyperscalers, the US may end up accessing your data. And since you’ve accepted their terms of use, you agree to let them legally spy on you if they “need to.” If you want my critical data, you’ll have to protect it. The new regulations require service providers who want to work with critical European data to demonstrate that they are not subject to requests from non-EU governments. This automatically excludes Microsoft, Google or Amazon, because all three are subject to the CLOUD Act. Europe is thus looking for providers that guarantee that critical data will not be in the possession of companies that then have to transfer it to foreign powers. Europe depends on the American cloud. The reality is that today Amazon (AWS), Microsoft (Azure) and Google (Google Cloud) currently control more than 70% of the Cloud Computing market in the old continent. Losing these institutional contracts would mean a significant financial blow, but it also sends a powerful signal to European private companies: if Brussels does not trust the US with its secrets, why should European corporations? The domino effect could be huge. Europe has its own clouds. This directive would give an important opportunity to initiatives that seemed stalled like GAIA-Xbut there are also companies with their own infrastructure such as OVH (France) or T-Systems (Germany). There are significant technical challenges in that area, because US hyperscalers have been refining their offering over the past two decades. However, Brussels seems willing to accept a somewhat less efficient or complete service in exchange for greater autonomy. The options existno doubt, but the challenge is enormous. Migrating is going to be expensive. It is one thing to make the decision and quite another to complete that migration that will require moving decades of data and systems to a different infrastructure. Current data centers would have to be expanded to meet demand, they say some analysisand that would mean a cost of between 14,000 and 24,000 million euros. Consulting companies like Forrester they don’t see anything clear that the EU can achieve cloud sovereignty, and other experts also make it clear that Europe will not abandon the hyperscalers. Traceability. In addition to changing suppliers, the board also wants to impose strict requirements regarding transparency. AI systems that have access to that data must be auditable by the newly created EU AI Office. The Commission wants to know who has access to the code, who maintains the servers and who has the technical capacity to manage and even intercept such data transfers. Data too sensitive. In comments to CNBCEU officials explained that there are active debates demanding that financial, judicial or health data used at the government level and in the public sector have a sovereign cloud infrastructure. That’s also true for military data, of course, and There are already movements in that direction. Fragmented Internet. The move confirms that the world appears to be heading toward a future with a fragmented internet and one that will have important geopolitical boundaries. While the US tries to defend its technology against China, Europe and the entire world are trying to avoid or at least mitigate their excessive dependence on American technological solutions. Image | İsmail Enes Ayhan and François Genon In Xataka | Europe no longer trusts Google. That is why several start-ups are designing an independent payment system on Android

Google has become (even) more demanding with captchas. The Open Source community has not been amused at all

by

One of the conversations of the weekend was carried out by important developers, such as those from GrapheneOS. Google’s new security measures related to website access are beginning to be implemented in 2026 and, as a result, both custom ROMs and operating systems without Google presence have it tough. Google Cloud Fraud. If someone is okay with traffic light captchas as a security measure, I would tell you that they are not trustworthy. Google was also clear that they were not always ideal, so it developed an alternative solution, the evolution of reCAPTCHA. When the system detects suspicious traffic, it does not use the captcha system, it asks the user to scan a QR code with their smartphone. According to Googleis the best way to fight against bots and unwanted agents, protecting against attacks and possible fraud. But everything has a B side. The problem. The problem is that, for this security measure to work on Android, it is mandatory that the device has Google Play Services installed in a recent version. One of the key points of custom ROMs like GrapheneOS It is precisely that they are systems based on Open Source Android, but without Google services. Google Play Services is Google’s proprietary software layer that runs on certified Androids and provides, among other things, the APIs that verify that a device is approved by Google. Without them, it is not possible to satisfy the requests of the Play Integrity API, which is responsible for approving web access. The GrapheneOS case. GrapheneOS is one of the most secure ROMs in the world, one that has earned its reputation thanks to additional layers built on AOSP and, above all, by not having Google services or needing them for its operation. The GrapheneOS team argues that this has nothing to do with security. They claim that Play Integrity API rejects GrapheneOS and other systems even though it is technically more secure than most devices that do pass verification. Google’s Play Integrity API allows devices without security patches for years but updated to Play Services, but blocks the use of GrapheneOS even though it is much more technically secure. Mega’s entrance. After the complaint not only from Graphene, but from Cyber ​​DigestMega has come in to criticize the measure. Remember that in 2023 an attempt was made to do something similar with Web Environment Integrity (WEI). This was a proposal that Google had to abandon after criticism. That year, Google tried to put in place a mechanism that would allow websites to check whether the software and hardware on a user’s device was verified by Google. The logic was the same as now: if your settings did not conform to what Google considered acceptable, access was blocked. The proposal generated such widespread rejection among developers, web standards organizations and users that Google had to withdraw it. And now what. The relevant question is not whether or not Google is entitled to do this, because it is. The question is what happens when the de facto standard for online verification is controlled by the same company that sells the hardware and software necessary to surpass it. In Xataka | There is a race to get the first phone with 100% free software: so far there has only been failure

How to create a Telegram bot that summarizes your Google Calendar appointments every morning with AI

by

We are going to tell you how to create a Telegram bot that summarize your Google Calendar appointments and events each daymaking him a personal secretary who gives you a summary every morning. To do this, we will make the bot use artificial intelligence as Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude or whatever you prefer. To carry out this task we are going to use two third-party services. First we will use BotFather from Telegram to create the bot, and then we will go to the service Make to create a workflow or workflow that adds an AI, which in the case of our step by step will be Gemini, but you can use any other. But before we start, just one warning. This method is very easy and useful, but in the end you will be giving your calendar information to third parties. Google already has it, but you will also be sharing it on the Make platform, and that is something you should always keep in mind. First you must create the bot The first thing you should do is create a bot on Telegram with BotFather. To do this, write a message to the bot @BotFather and write to you as if you were a new user. Type the command /newbot to create a new bot, to which you have to give a name to identify yourself and a unique username to access the bot whenever you want. When you do it, it will give you two things, first the username and address of your bot to access it, and second an access token with various figures and letters. You have to save this token to use later. In the message that Telegram will return to you, will also give you a link to the bot you createdwhich will basically be t.me/@botname. This will be important for later. Also you can use BotFather options to customize your botputting a profile image, a description or whatever you want. We have explained all this to you in our post about BotFather. Once the bot is created you must enter and run it with the /Start command so that it remains active, even if doing so does not respond to anything. Now get the API of an AI Now you need the API of an AI. We will use the Free Gemini APIwhich although it has some limits in its use, is more than enough for a little use. To get it go to the website aistudio.google.com and sign in with your Google account. When you do, go to Dashboard and click on API keys. in here, click on the option Create API key which you have at the top right. Now you have to click on the option Create API key that appears at the top of the screen you have created. This will open a window where you have to create the project for which you are going to use it in order to identify it, for example “Secretary Bot”. When you create the project, you can now create the API. And by the way, if you want something more advanced, We have also explained payment alternatives to the Google API. In Basics you have articles where you can see the prices and how to get the ChatGPT APIthe Claude APIthe DeepSeek API wave Qwen API. Now create the workflow Now it’s time to create your workflow. For this, you will have to enter Make.com, and create a new scenario. This will take you to a screen where you just have to click on the add button to add the first module, and then to the right of each module click on + to add another adjacent one. But to do this, you will have to configure each module before chaining the next one. We are going to guide you and explain to you the four modules you should add and how to configure themas well as then scheduling the scenario to run every day at the time you want. 1. Add the calendar module To start, you have to create a new module. On the screen that opens, choose Google Calendarand in the options click on the module Search Events. You will have to sign in with your Google account. In the configuration window, you will have to add the following elements that we are going to list: Calendar ID: Choose the primary calendar or the one where you have the data of the meetings or elements that you want to summarize. Start Date: Paste the following: {{formatDate(now; “YYYY-MM-DD”)}}T00:00:00Z End Date: Paste the following: {{formatDate(now; “YYYY-MM-DD”)}}T23:59:59Z Single Events: In this field, choose the option Yes. When you have everything, click on Save. If you want, click below Run eleven so that Make takes a look at your calendar, and so in the next module you can put options related to the results obtained. 2. Add the text aggregator Now you have to add a next module chained with the calendar. In the applications press Toolsand inside click on Text Aggregator. Now, enter the module, and in the field text you will have to choose the options 1.Summary and 1.Start. If you get confused, just by clicking on the text field a window with suggestions will appear. In it, search for Google Calendar suggestions, and in the results click on the options Summary and startso that when filled in they appear with the number 1. If they do not appear, first do a Run eleven with the calendar module alone so that they appear when creating the Text Aggregator. 3. Add Gemini into the equation With what we have done so far, the automation analyzes your calendar and obtains the events. Now it’s the turn of send it all to Gemini so that it then generates the response. For this, choose the module Geminiand link the AI ​​using the API we obtained before. Once you have done it, it’s time to configure the module. In AI Model you have to … Read more

It’s bad news for Google

by

If the question is which AI makes better images, the general answer would be Google’s Nano Banana 2. And if we talk about preparing reports rigorously, we would probably say that Claude is the one who takes the lead. But in the AI ​​race, just as important as being the best is appearing to be the best. And above all, make money with your model. And if the arrival of artificial intelligence to the labor market has felt like an earthquake in the shape of more or less related layoffs, barriers to entry to junior profiles and have to work more Against all odds, the reality is that in recent months the scenario of which AI is the favorite of companies has taken a turn. Visual Capitalist has published a graph that monitors month by month from January 2023 to March 2026 what percentage of US companies pay for each provider’s models. To prepare it, they used anonymized spending data from more than 50,000 companies on the platform. ramptaking only paid subscriptions, so free use is left out. The result is a clear picture of consolidation: the market is shrinking towards very few players at breakneck speed. The graph marks a clear winner from the start: OpenAI is the most widespread payment AI provider among US companies, reaching a share of 35.2% in March of this year. Just behind is Anthropic with a share of 30.6%. You have to look down a lot to find the others: Google, xAI and the rest of the providers are below 5%. But the most important thing when looking at the photo is not who the leader is but the trend: Anthropic’s is a meteoric rise. What AI model are companies paying for? The market closes and It only has room for two: OpenAI and Anthropic together account for nearly 66% of the AI ​​business payment market in the United States, meaning that two out of every three dollars that companies spend on AI models go to these two companies. The rest share the crumbs. This type of concentration is the fish that bites its tail: leading companies have more customers, more usage data and more resources to improve their products, so their pursuers have it increasingly difficult, although it is true that Google has muscle for a while. What AI models are companies paying for? Visual Capitalist with Ramp data January 2025 is a key date in the graph: OpenAI was present in 16.8% of companies and Anthropic barely had 4.1%, slightly below Google’s 4.2% share. In 14 months Anthropic has multiplied its presence sevenfold, while OpenAI has doubled it and Google has 4.3%. The takeoff coincides with the launch of Claude Code in February 2025, its scheduling assistant that became general availability in May of that year, and accelerates with the arrival of Cowork in January 2026, its workflow platform. That Claude be a rocket The graph has several explanations. Yes, it’s a good AI model, but Anthropic has been able to build concrete tools around that model that companies use every day and that make it difficult to switch vendors. According to Sacra estimatesas of October 2025, Anthropic had more than 300,000 business clients that represented approximately 80% of its revenue, which shows that those at Amodei were clear about their strategy from the beginning: their niche is the company and not so much the ordinary user. Google has been oscillating between 3 and 4.5% in business share for three years, a marginal advance compared to the budding duopoly and the investment made. Elon Musk’s xAI has gone from zero to 1.9% in March 2026, which means appearing on the map, but still very far from the competition. But the case of Google is the one that truly baffles: It has cutting-edge technology, one of the most powerful cloud infrastructures in the world and access to an amount of data like never before, but it doesn’t get companies to open their wallets. Everything indicates that the problem is in how it has packaged its products: dispersed among too many brands and platforms, which creates real confusion for the business customer. In Xataka | If the question is which of the big tech companies is winning the AI ​​race, the answer is: none In Xataka | The US’s problem in the AI ​​and humanoid race is not China: it is all of Asia and it is greatly disadvantaged Cover | Visual Capitalist

I’ve had the Apple Watch on my wrist for 10 years. The only thing I asked for was the Google bracelet

by

Server has had an Apple Watch in his drawer for months. And just take advantage of the introductory offer of the Fitbit Air for 99 euros plus 45 euros of balance in the Google Store (just what the straps are worth). Because? Because I’ve been waiting for exactly that product for years. No screen. In my particular case (and like a good part of Spain), practical crossfit daily. and the crossfit It is not a sport compatible with smart watches. Many of the movements require the barbell or kettlebell to hit the wrist, and you wouldn’t want to have a Apple Watch Ultra receiving a little kiss 32 kilos. Being able to have a smart device without a screen is a dream come true for me, since I can meet my health tracking needs without worrying about anything else. Why not the Whoop. Yes, Google has not discovered the fire. Whoop has his own bracelet and Polar launched theirs free of subscription. Whoop’s problem was precisely that, being literally tied to a membership of at least 199 euros per year (and that in the cheapest version). Amazfit has your Helio Strap for the same price than the Google bracelet, although it is a fairly bulky device and very similar to a smartwatch. However, Google has managed to launch a hybrid between a simple strap and a MiBand for 99 euros. A device from which, knowing Fitbit’s history, I expect measurement sensors with higher quality than those I have tried in similarly priced alternatives. I don’t want notifications. It is a completely personal decision, but one of my goals in the last two years is to respect digital disconnection. I’m not the first to buy a smartwatch to not depend so much on the phone… and end up turning my wrist every now and then to see what notification it has. Removing the screen completely eliminates this barrier. No calls, no notifications, no temptations of any kind. Just a device that works in the background measuring my vitals. No subscriptions. Google has done well with the two systems that its Fitbit allows: the paid one and the base one. It is not a device that requires a subscription to enjoy the basics required and, only in case we want to expand its functions, we can choose to checkout. PREMIUM BASE follow-up Steps, calories, distance traveled, cardiovascular load and recovery. Personalized physical activity plans. Steps, calories, distance traveled, cardiovascular load and recovery Measurements Heart rate, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, blood oxygen (SpO2) and more Heart rate, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, blood oxygen (SpO2) and more sport Adaptive physical activity plans Personalized weekly workouts and physical activity plans, adapted to your goals and that you can adapt to your lifestyle – dream Sleep score, schedule, duration and phases. Personalized sleep summaries. Sleep score, schedule, duration and phases. records Notes on weight, nutrition, water consumption, mood and menstrual cycle. Proactive information and statistics about your records. Notes on weight, nutrition, water consumption, mood and menstrual cycle. additional Library with mindfulness sessions, such as meditation, guided breathing, relaxation and more. Library of dynamic workouts led by expert trainers and instructors. Personalized Gemini-based coach – The subscription model for 8.99 euros per month adds Gemini as an ally, but it is not essential or mandatory. The bracelet, without any type of subscription, does everything you would ask of a product of this type. With an app with a lot of potential. The Fitbit app has been renamed Google Health, an important declaration of intent after purchasing Fitbit for 2.1 billion dollars. Google will collect all the data related to health here, finally giving the love it deserves to an app that was far behind its direct rival (Health on iOS). In short, an economical product, which allows me to forget that I am wearing a smart watch or bracelet, and whose information I will only consult at the end of the day as a summary. In Xataka | Best activity bracelets. Which one to buy and most recommended models from 25 euros

The spike in Google searches after the 2024 eclipse reveals that we continue to ignore science

by

It has been known for a long time that It is not healthy to look directly at a solar eclipse. It is said that Socrates himself I already recommended looking at it reflected in the waterbut never directly. However, human beings have a fairly significant tendency to ignore scientific recommendations. This is possibly the reason why in 2024, after an eclipse in the United States, Google searches for the phrase “my eyes hurt” had a very abrupt peak. The time and place coincide. That peak of searches took place on April 8, 2024 at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Just at that moment a solar eclipse was occurring whose strip of totality crossed from Mexico to Canada, passing through the United States. The states where the most searches were carried out were Vermont, Arkansas, Michigan, Ohio and Indiana, all of them immersed in the path of the eclipse. Eclipse retinopathy. When looking directly into sunlight, the retina can suffer serious damage. The condition that occurs is known as eclipse retinopathy and causes symptoms such as photosensitivity, blurred vision and headache. Vision can be affected for months or even permanently in the most severe cases. For this reason, no matter how much it may seem like the sun is covered, we must look at it with adequate protection. No sunglasses or x-rays. We have all heard at some point that it is safe to look at an eclipse through an x-ray or a photo negative. However, this is a myth that can be very dangerous. Sunglasses are not safe either. Generally, These are prepared to filter approximately 99.9% of solar ultraviolet radiation.. However, in the event of an eclipse, in which we look directly at the sun, this protection is needed, added to a filter of 99.999% of visible sunlight. It is necessary to use special eclipse glasses, always with filters approved by the competent authorities. Be careful with binoculars and telescopes. We should also not look directly through telescopes or binoculars without using filters. These are placed outside the lens and protect our retinas from solar radiation when we look through them. If none of this seems right to us, we can always resort to a pinhole camera, which reflects the image of the eclipse on another surface. Something like what Socrates advised about looking at the reflection in the water. It is important to use approved glasses You shouldn’t even look at a total eclipse. When the eclipse is total, the Sun is completely obscured. At that point, we might feel safe without protection. The problem is that it is not easy to calculate the exact moment in which the eclipse will begin to dissolve and with just a little bit of light, just when the Sun begins to reappear, we can damage our retinas. It is important to use protection from the beginning. It wasn’t eclipse retinopathy. In reality, the symptoms of eclipse retinopathy They usually appear several hours after the event. Interestingly, eye pain is not one of these symptoms. Therefore, what all those people were looking for was due to another reason. When we look at the sun, we usually experience a blink reflex that forces us to look away. However, with a solar eclipse the brightness is dimmed enough for this reflection to disappear. As a consequence, we can comfortably look at the Sun and keep our eyes fixed, without blinking. That’s what can make our eyes hurt or feel a burning sensation. Specifically, that is not dangerous. Still, those Google searches show that many people were worried. Many of them may not have used protection and regretted it. Ready for August. Next August 12 we will have the first of the eclipses that make up the Iberian Trio. Many people have already bought tickets to travel to some of the points in the totality zone. There are even those who have gotten tickets for one of the many festivals that will be celebrated for this reason. Whatever plan we choose, the important thing is protection. Maybe, even if we protect ourselves, there will be a peak in Google searches, but it better be because we don’t blink for a while and not because we have really damaged our retinas. Image | Magnific/NASA | POT In Xataka | The trio of eclipses that await Spain on the horizon: an unprecedented and historic chain between 2026 and 2028

Your Gmail inbox has been filled with emails obviously written with AI. Google wants to fix it with more AI

by

We’ve all spent several minutes staring at the cursor, thinking about how to respond to that important email; Find the tone that is forceful and kind at the same time, but not too kind. With Gemini integration into Gmail We don’t have to think so much anymore, we can say just that and the AI ​​writes it for us. The cost is that all emails sound like AI, and Google knows it. Help me write. It is a function that Google integrated into Gmail a long time ago and that allows us to compose emails from a prompt. Google just announced improvements for this feature: contextualization of the theme (you can now connect with Drive and Gmail to extract relevant information) and customization of tone and style. Google says it creates drafts that “reflect your personal writing style.” It is a way of recognizing that AI is homogenizing everything, including how we communicate. All emails sound the same. Automatic reply suggestions and writing aids have been a blessing for those who have to write and respond to many emails a day. When it comes to “cold emails” that seek to attract the recipient’s attention, in the end none of them stand out. A marketing manager has on Reddit that before it used to read them all, now it deletes them directly. It only reads them if it looks like a human wrote it. The problem goes beyond our inbox, social networks like X or LinkedIn are full of posts written with AI. It is even being noticed in the works submitted by students at the university. Humanize AI. This is where we are: we use AI constantly, but we don’t want it to be noticed. a search It gives us dozens of tools that promise to humanize our texts generated with AI. And it doesn’t just happen with texts, an illustrator friend told me that a client presented her with some illustrations so she could improve them. They were AI illustrations and the problem wasn’t that they were bad, it was that they said they were AI too much and I wanted them to look handmade. Plus, I wanted to pay him less because I just had to remake them in his style. He refused. Non-communication. The novelty that Google has announced is based on your writing style of previous emails, but what happens when all those previous emails were also written with AI? It’s an endless cycle: you write an email with AI, they respond using AI, you read the summary that the AI ​​has made of the email and you respond again using AI. The writer Tim O’Brien said: that if “no one has written it, no one has read it.” This is not just a stylistic issue, it is a bigger problem: we are delegating something as basic as our own communication. In Xataka | From chaos to calm: this is how I manage my email using the “inbox zero” technique Image | Google

We are increasingly looking for human answers on Reddit. That is the reason why the Google search engine is now a Reddit in disguise

by

Google has updated its search platform for the umpteenth time, but it has done so with an especially significant change. The user experience in its AI search engines (both AI Overviews and AI Mode) attempts to become more “human”. And to do this, in these searches Google will add more context to the links, such as extracts from internet forums and blogs. And if there is a beneficiary (or harmed) of that movement, it is Reddit. Google was already a gateway to Reddit. There is a behavior that Google has been seeing in its data for years and that for a long time it preferred not to publicly acknowledge: when someone wants a real answer to a real question, add “Reddit” to the end of the search. Not because Reddit is necessarily a reliable source, but because Reddit brings together real people who have experienced this issue, tried to solve it, and written about it without anyone paying them to do so. Google, with all its infrastructure and all its algorithms, had not managed to replicate that. So instead of trying it’s going to incorporate those answers directly. What exactly has changed. The search engine update will make in AI Overviews Fragments from forums, social networks and other “first-person sources” appear. When someone searches for something for which there is no single objective answer, Google’s AI will include perspectives and opinions found in all kinds of (supposedly) human sources online. Doing so will add the name of the creator of that content (or their avatar) and the origin from which said perspective comes. Google also promises to add more context about the origin of its AI-generated answers, similar to how ChatGPT or Claude include links supporting their answers. Tired of so much SEO. The reason is obvious: Google’s organic results for practical and subjective questions—”what vacuum cleaner should I buy”, “how do I cure my dog’s ear”, “what is the best neighborhood to live in in Valencia”— They are dominated by SEO and those techniques optimized to appear on Google. It is important to position, not answer the question well. That is precisely where Reddit, like other forums or personal blogs, has something that this content usually does not have: the real experience of someone who was in the same situation. Google sums it up in its own statement bluntly: “For many searches, people are increasingly looking to other people for advice.” The contradiction that Google has not resolved. There is a potential problem in this new way of conceiving these searches with AI. AI Overviews were designed to answer questions directly and thus save the user the work of clicking, reading and researching. Now they will include diverse and even contradictory perspectives from forums and social networks. So, will AI Overviews answer the question, or will it make us go back to the sources to find the answer? If it is the latter, it will not be very different from what I already did the traditional Google search engine. There is an interesting imbalance here between “we give you the answer” and “we give you context so you can find the answer.” In a sense, Google’s decision complicates searches. AI models are becoming less prone to failure. The famous cases of add glue to pizza are much less common now, and new models often boast a significant reduction in “hallucination” rates that they have. GPT-5.5 Instant, released this week, “produced 52.5% fewer hallucinations than GPT-5.3 Instant,” OpenAI indicated in its official announcement. The problem is that these hallucinations are increasingly difficult to detect because these chatbots hide these mistakes very well. That the system now includes unverified or validated content from networks like Reddit can be problematic: community votes do not always measure how truthful or useful a certain thread is. Using Reddit has its drawbacks. This platform has value precisely because it is not optimized for Google algorithms: It is chaotic and contradictory.. Sometimes there are brilliant responses from people, but other times there are completely wrong comments. When a user adds “Reddit” to their search and reads the results, they are automatically weighing which comments are useful and which are not. But that step disappears if Google extracts fragments of those discussions to include in an AI Overview. Eliminate that human filtering step and presents those answers with an authority that perhaps they should not have. Google will have much more difficulty than a human in distinguishing the comment of someone who has been working in plumbing for twenty years from that of someone who tinkers as a hobby. The shadow contract. This is not just an editorial or technological decision. In 2024 Google signed a deal worth $60 million a year with Reddit to access their data and train their models. You are not incorporating content from this social network as a public service: what you are doing is monetizing a commercial contract. Your message that you are highlighting those “original voices” is really saying that you have paid for that privileged access to Reddit content and now you are going to take advantage of that access and make it profitable. That revenue is interesting for Reddit, no doubt, but there is a problem: clicks. The Stack Overflow Precedent. There is no need to speculate much about what may happen because it has already happened. Stack Overflow is the largest technical Q&A community on the internet, but has lost most of its traffic in two years because AI companies They started collecting all those answers. to train your models and then serve them to your users directly. That caused users to stop visiting Stack Overflow and experts to stop answering questions. The quality of the new content on this network was clearly affected, and it became clear that if the AI ​​already gave you the answer without having to enter Stack Overflow, why enter? The danger for Reddit is exactly the same. Google didn’t have many alternatives. ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity They have been capturing … Read more

everything we know and think we know so far about the next Google mobile

by

Let’s collect you everything we think we know about the future Google Pixel 11the family of mobile phones that is the successor to the current ones Pixel 10. As is usual in the industry, weeks and months before the launch of the most anticipated mobile phones, the Internet is filled with all kinds of leaks, and we will tell you the most interesting and plausible. We are going to start by talking to you about the possible presentation dates of the new Google Pixel 11, because based on experience we can already narrow the range quite a bit. Then we will tell you the models that there may be, to finish by going into the features that have been leaked. Finally, you should know that the Pixel 11 will be the first to arrive with Android 17 serial. And as usual, you will also do so enjoying some exclusive featuresin addition to being one of the first where you can try all the other new features of the operating system. When do we think the Google Pixel 11 will come out Although historically Google used to present its phones in the months of October, the strategy has been changing to have a greater role, advancing the presentations by a few months. We will update this article periodically to add new leaks. We hope that the Pixel 11 will be presented in mid-August 2026during the “Made by Google” event. As we have seen in the latest models, the normal thing is that The launch is at the end of the montha couple of weeks after the announcement. What models are expected to exist? As we have seen in Google internal documents that have been leaked, it seems that the current structure of four high-end devices. They would be the following: Pixel 11 (codename “cubs”) Pixel 11 Pro (codename “grizzly”) Pixel 11 Pro XL (codename “kodiak”) Pixel 11 Pro Fold (code name “yogi”) In addition to this, months later a version 11a will arrivewhich like all those in the A range will have less power and will be more economical, although it will maintain some of the characteristics of its older brothers. What do we know so far Now, we are going to compile everything that has been leaked so far about the different components of the future Pixel 11 family. We are going to touch on what we know about the camera, the processors and other of its internal components. Design, size and screens According to the latest CAD-based renders leaked by OnLeaks and Android Headlinesit is expected that Pixels maintain their design languageand that there are no drastic changes in its appearance. This means that the edges and rounded corners will remain flat. The change that does seem to occur is that screen bezels will be thinner. The iconic horizontal camera module that makes these phones so recognizable will also be maintained, although in this case it seems that the panel will be made of completely black glass. Regarding the dimensions, everything points because they will be almost the same size as the previous generation. The only thing that will change is that they are expected to be a little thinner, going from 8.5 to 8.4 millimeters on the Pixel 11 Pro. As for the displays, we can expect a 6.3-inch LTPO OLED panel, while the Pro XL model will be 6.8 inches. So far everything is normal, no news, although some media such as Mobiflip suggest that Google could release new Samsung M16 OLED panels. This would be a major change, and would mean more maximum brightness and greater energy efficiency. Finally, on the Mystic Leaks Telegram channel, which specializes in leaks, the term is mentioned “Pixel Glow”. This would be an addition of RGB LED lights like the one you can find on mobile phones like those from the manufacturer Nothing. This term was mentioned in a leak where the cameras of the Pixel 11 Pro are also detailed and that the Tensor G6 processor will be used. Cameras and photography As for the main cameras, it is expected that there will be continuity with a triple camera with a 50 megapixel main sensor, an ultra wide angle and a 5x telephoto lens. We will also have improved AI processing for aspects such as cinematic blur, low light video and surely other aspects. Yes, more changes are expected on the front of the device, especially in biometrics. One of the first leaks pointed out that Google could bring back the infrared camera that we last saw on the Pixel 4, allowing the device to have 3D facial recognition at the level of Face ID of iPhones. With this, the Pixel could authorize payments and unlock the screen with your face even in the dark. However, this so-called ‘Project Tuscany’ of the infrared camera has barely appeared in leaks, so it is still early to know if it is true. Processor and memory The processor is possibly the field where the Pixel 11 will change the most. The leaks say that the new Tensor G6 will be manufactured by TSMC, the same manufacturer as the Pixel 10 after years of trusting Samsung, and that a 2 nanometer process will be used. Tensor processors have always followed Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chips, and with this change Google hopes surpass them in power and efficiency. In fact, there are leaks that suggest that the new Google chip will have 15% higher performancein addition to an improvement in thermal and energy efficiency of 30%. This would help a lot to improve the autonomy of the device. The leaks also talk about 12 GB of RAM as a base, with which to help run the advanced functions of Gemini directly on the device in a fluid way. Additionally, we also expect a new Titan M3 security chip. Battery and connectivity We hope that the battery of the next Pixel 11 will be about 5,000 mAh for the base modeland greater capacities for the XL … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.