A factory in Ireland made a fortune selling baby formula to China. Until the Chinese stopped having children

If China’s demographic crisis is not reversed, if the world’s factories shrink and nothing stops the bleeding, its decline will drag and have effects throughout the world: from cost increases in consumer goods (telephones, footwear, electric vehicles) to inflationary pressures due to lower manufacturing efficiency. As an example, a “button”: thousands of kilometers from China, an entire population is already suffering from the lack of babies in Beijing. In Ireland, no one imagined a situation like this. Industrial mirage. For years, the small Irish town of Askeatonin County Limerick, found his redemption in a factory that produced gold dust. It wasn’t a metaphor. Infant milk was produced on Nestlé production lines for the chinese marketa product so profitable that some workers nicknamed it “the white cocaine” of the town. Overnight, that business transformed a town forgotten by modernization into a prosperous enclave, where credit flowed easily and employment was synonymous with stability. But when the Swiss managers arrived two years ago with the closure announcementdisbelief took over everyone. Nobody could conceive that such a modern plant, the result of a million-dollar investment, would simply be closed. Rely on China. Nestlé attributed the decision to a macroeconomic reason: he birth rate crash in China. The number of births had fallen from 18 million in 2016 to just nine million in 2023, and demand for foreign infant formula was sinking. However, The New York Times said that among the 1,100 inhabitants of Askeaton the official version did not convince. There were those who suspected that the multinational was simply responding to a Chinese demand: to move production to Asian territory itself. The argument made sense. For years, Nestlé had closed markets in Europe and the Middle East to concentrate exclusively in China. “We put all our eggs in one basket.” remember the diary Oliver Scanlon, one of the veterans of the place. And although the business experienced its golden age with that turn, everyone understood too late what it meant: China was not only buying the product, it was also learning how to manufacture it. Silent learning. The workers recount how every year Chinese auditors arrived, curious to the extreme, writing down every technical detail of the industrial process. Sometimes they even visited neighboring farms, taking an interest in dairy production methods. “They came to learn,” counted rancher Tim Hanley. “They can produce everything, and their goal is self-sufficiency.” Ultimately, what happened at Askeaton was the consequence of a repeated pattern: the initial enthusiasm for the Chinese market ended with the transfer of knowledge and the relocation of production. In November 2023, just a month after announcing the Irish closure, Nestlé obtained authorization to open a twin plant in Suzhoueast of China. While justifying the closure due to the drop in birth rates, the company proclaimed that the Chinese market “continued to be the largest in the world by absolute number of newborns.” Jobless. The Times remembered that the closure of the plant has left a visible scar. The machines stopped last month and, unless someone purchases the facilities for the 22 million euros at which Nestlé has valued them, the doors will close permanently in March. Layoffs, severance packages and outplacement programs have not compensated for the sense of loss. The factory was the invisible engine that made local businesses run, from Seán Moran’s hardware store to the credit union, which for years granted loans with only a payroll as collateral. “It was a good salary and the town prospered,” admits Patrick Ranahan, head of the entity. “But we knew it could disappear from one day to the next.” From globalization to dependency. He Askeaton’s case It is an example of the vulnerability of local economies in the era of globalization. The sudden success, sustained by Chinese demand, masked the fragility of a model based on a single customer and a single market. What began as a story of international cooperation ended up being technology transfer disguised as prosperity. In the process, China not only bought the product, but also the knowledge, and when it was ready to replicate it, it simply cut the tie. For Askeaton, the “crown jewel” has become a symbol of a bitter lesson: in global commerce, the shine of success can fade as quickly as the foam on the powdered milk that fed them for half a century. Image | Nestle In Xataka | The great paradox of China’s demographic crisis: its origin is due to a policy that worked too well In Xataka | China knows that its population is going to collapse but it already has a long-term plan to solve it. Of course, thanks to AI

Having many children sounds great as a way to preserve the species. Until you start passing genetic mutations

Men do not have a limit marked by nature in which a ‘stop’ is applied when it comes to having more offspring (such as if women have), although little by little it is becoming more complicated. But even if there is no such limit choosing to become parents at an older ageis not the most recommended due to the great risks it has, as pointed out a published study in Nature magazine recently. Risk age. The idea that the age of the mother It is a crucial factor for the baby’s health is deeply rooted in the collective consciousness and has been seen to Older age is associated with diseases such as Down syndrome. However, science has been accumulating evidence for years that the father’s age also plays a fundamental role. We already knew that about 80% of new genetic mutations (those not inherited from either parent) come from the paternal germline. What we didn’t know was the magnitude of the mechanism that accelerates it. Selfish sperm. The team of researchers from Wellcome Sanger Institute in the United Kingdomled by Raheleh Rahbari and Matthew Neville, has put a name and surname to the problem: selfish selection of spermatogonia. In simple terms, this means that certain genetic mutations not only alter a gene, but give a competitive advantage to the stem cells that produce sperm (spermatogonia). These mutated cells replicate faster and more efficiently than their healthy counterparts, so they will predominate ahead of the gametes that are suitable. As a result, as the years go by, the percentage of sperm carrying these “selfish” mutations increases exponentially, not linearly, and this results in a man in his early thirties having 1 sperm in every 50 with a disease-causing mutation. But when you reach the age of 70, this figure shoots up to 1 sperm in every 20. How it has been seen. To reach this conclusion, scientists needed highly precise technology, since right now standard sequencing methods have an error rate that can make it difficult to see a specific mutation. This is where a technique called duplex sequencing (NanoSeq). Its operation is very simple, since instead of reading a single strand of DNA, this method reads both strands of the double helix. If a mutation is detected on both strands in exactly the same place, it is virtually impossible for it to be a machine error. It is a real mutation. Thanks to this precision, they were able to analyze more than 35,000 mutations in the sperm of 81 men between 24 and 75 years old. In this case, the results identified more than 40 key genes where these selfish mutations tend to occur. Most are associated with serious neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism itself or even increasing the probability of suffering from cancer throughout the offspring’s life. Genetic sanctuary. Interestingly, the study revealed a surprising fact when comparing the mutations in the sperm with those in the blood cells of the same men. In the blood, the impact of lifestyle was evident: men who smoked, drank alcohol excessively or were obese had a much higher mutation burden. However, no correlation with these factors was found in sperm. The mutations accumulated at a rate eight times slower and seemed immune to the individual’s habits. This suggests that the testicles function as a biological “sanctuary,” a protected niche that the body strives to keep safe from harmful environmental factors. Family planning. Logically, when making the decision to reproduce this changes many things, since to avoid this accumulation of mutations it would be interesting to do it the younger the better. Both in the case of men and women. But the reality we have in our society is that family conciliation has not yet been achieved, and this means that becoming mothers and fathers has to be delayed. In this way, the study points to the possibility of including sperm freezing at an earlier age if considering having children or considering genetic screening techniques for elderly parents. Although all this has a cost behind it. In Xataka | Someone thinks they know why fertility is plummeting around the world: men and women are doing “better” separately

His children and grandchildren turned his inheritance into a nightmare

Although Disney is today a gigantic company whose ramifications touch all or almost all areas of popular culture, its origins were darker. Both because of its tinyness and because of some of the stories that populate it. The company was founded by brothers Walt and Roy Disney in 1923 and has since been responsible for some of the most iconic and beloved films of all time. However, the history of his Disney heirs It has little of a fairy tale, and a lot of Tarantino film: drugs, betrayals and trusts. The Burbank magician died on December 15, 1966, leaving two daughters and ten grandchildren who would share an enormous legacy of one of the most influential people in the entertainment industry. Less known is the figure of his brother Roy Oliver Disney, co-founder of the company, who also left descendants when he died five years later. Although the descendants were not many, in the history of their legacy one can find touches of Cinderella with her stepsisters, fighting princesses like Pocahontas and some ugly duckling that in the end gave a lot to talk about. Nowadays it is difficult to know precisely the percentage of the company that each heir owns of the company or How much is the fortune of each family member?. The last estimate was made by one of Walt Disney’s grandsons, who calculated that the heirs barely kept 3% of the company’s shares compared to the 20% that his father controlled. To put it a little in context, Steve Jobs left a legacy when he died of 7.54% of Disney shares to his widow. However, although it may seem that 3% of the company is not much, given the size that the company has adopted In recent years, that percentage would imply that Disney’s direct heirs would share a pie of 4.65 billion dollars. Grandpa Walt’s inheritance Walt Disney’s share passed to his two daughters: Diane Marie Disney and Sharon Mae Disney. The first had no less than seven children and lived a quiet life surrounded by vineyards, writing screenplays and honoring his father’s work with philanthropy under the Disney name. Sharon was adopted and was not as restrained with her father’s fortune as her sister. He was married twice. In his first marriage he adopted his daughter Victoria Diane Brownand in her second marriage to Bill Lund she had twins: brad and Michelle Lund Disney. Things in life (and business), Bill Lund was the promoter of the land where it currently stands Disney World in Orlando. Walt Disney’s youngest daughter, Sharon, died in 1993 of breast cancer at the age of 56, leaving her three children a fortune of $400 million as a result of Grandpa Walt’s legacy. The most conflictive since she was a child was Victoria Diane, with a reputation for being manipulative and destructive who, according to publish Hollywood Reporterwas capable of spending $5,000 on a night of debauchery and heroin in Las Vegas in the 1980s. Victoria died in September 2002 at the age of 36. The twins brad and Michelle They were born with some learning problems, so their mother arranged for the deposit of their millionaire inheritance under the supervision of three trustees. These three managers would be in charge of giving them 20 million dollars every five years from the age of 35 until the 400 million that corresponded to them as inheritance were exhausted. If you only knew, Walt. (Commons) In addition, his mother had established a clause ensuring that her children made reasonable use of the money they received. It specified that they would only receive the money if they demonstrated “maturity and financial ability to manage and use the money in a prudent and responsible manner.” As if it were the very story of Cinderella, the managers of the fortune convinced Michelle to declared his twin brother incapable of managing his finances before turning 35, claiming that he suffered from Down Syndrome. That way, he would not receive payment from his mother’s trust fund. Unfortunately for Michelle, luck turned its back on her. She suffered a brain aneurysm and almost died before turning 40. Seriously ill, her father’s second wife offered to take her into her home with the intention of taking control of the succulent inheritance, and they tried to incapacitate her and put Michelle under his guardianship. However, the wealthy heiress recovered from the aneurysm and had to take her stepmother to court to regain control of her finances. Brad, who remained with his father, He didn’t have it easy at all to maintain Grandpa Walt’s legacy. First he got into fights with his sister Michelle and his aunt, who wanted to get their piece of the pie. Ultimately, Brad lost the legal battle and his percentage of the inheritance. The lineage of Roy Oliver Disney The other half of the Disneys are not exempt from controversy either. The line of heirs got off to a good start with the help of his son Roy Edward Disney. The young heir He became involved in the management of Disney until his death in 2009, leaving a legacy of $1.6 billion, approximately 1% of Disney shares. Walt Disney’s nephew left four heirs: Abigail, Tim, Roy Patrick and Susan Disney. Roy Edward Disney’s respectful and continuous nature with the company that his father and uncle Walt had founded was counteracted by the dissident and activist character of his daughter Abigail Disney. Roy Oliver Disney’s granddaughter dedicated a good part of her life to attacking the policies of the company founded by his grandfatheraccusing them of being capitalist exploiters. He even produced a documentary called The American Dream and Other Fairy Tales in which he denounces the labor exploitation situation suffered by some company employees. Abigail Disney was one of the millionaires who signed what was known as manifesto of the Davos millionairesin which a group of 200 millionaires from around the world asked the leaders of the world’s main economies tax large fortunes with higher … Read more

95% of his fortune was not going to be for his children

Bill Gates, has been removed from the first line of Microsoft commanddedicating all his time to distribute his fortune in the form of donations to health projectseducation and fight against climate change. From his current job, the Microsoft founder is doing everything possible to make his main objective a reality: donate 95% of his fortune and that his children only inherit A small percentage her. OBJECTIVE: Give your fortune. Long before becoming a father and when his heritage was already beginning to grow at a dizzying pace, Gates made it clear that his wealth was not going to go to his children. In An interview granted to Playboy magazine in 1994, Gates explained that in his plans there was already a long -term philanthropic goal, and was aware that donating a good part of his fortune It was not going to be a simple task. When asked about the amount of his fortune, Gates replied: “It is a ridiculous figure. But remember, 95% will give it to it. Don’t tell people to write to me. Gates’s conviction surprised from the beginning for the firmness with which he resigned to build a multimillionaire dynasty. He considered that money was not the key to a happy life or the ultimate goal of his career. Therefore, he decided early that His heirsalthough they would have a well -off life, they would not inherit virtually anything of their fortune. Money confuses you. Gates has repeated the same mantra on donar Most of his fortune in many other interviews and media over the years. For the founder of Microsoft, leave a millionaire sum to the children, instead of helping them, could “not do any favor” and “confuse them”, causing them to lose the perspective of what it implies working and striving to carve their own fortune. According to Gates in that interview, having an estimated fortune of 106,100 million “takes you from normal experiences in a way that probably weakens you. So I control that kind of things intentionally. It is one of those things of discipline. If my discipline failed, I would also confuse me. So I try to avoid it.” A well -off position. Although the first gastago of the Gates would still take a couple of years of years to be born when his father granted that interview, the millionaire was already clear that none of his children was going to lack anything. “I don’t believe in loading my children with that. They will have enough. They will be comfortable,” said the millionaire, stressing that even 1% of his fortune is already a notable amount of money. On the other hand, as part of their legacy, the children of Gates have studied in the best schools and universities in the country and have built their own professional careers under the watchful eye of their father, although without intervening significantly with their fortune. An example is found in his youngest daughter Phoebe, which recently PHIA launcheda purchasing platform with a colleague from the university. In her first foray into the business world, the youngest of the Gates had the Business Councils of his fatherbut as his mother confirmed to Fortunedid not have the financial support of the family. A difficult fortune to spend. According The published by ForbesMark Suzman, general director of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, said in 2022 that the foundation he directs had a fiduciary capital of more than 68,000 million dollars. However, all that money does not come only from Bill Gates’ funds. Your friend Warren Buffett has been contributing to thousands of millions every year. According to published data by the BBCsince its creation, the Foundation has already donated more than $ 100,000 million in programs to fight tuberculosis, malaria or diarrheal fevers, as well as in educational programs or in research and development projects of New technologies and energies To fight against climate change. Despite the enormous amount of money donated, Bill Gates still treasures 106.1 billion dollars, so he will have to step on the accelerator of donations much more if he wants to comply with one of the statements that he collected the BBC: “They will say many things about me when I die, but I am determined that ‘Rico died’ is not one of them.” In Xataka | “They don’t need 500 million dollars to live”: Mick Jagger refuses to leave a millionaire heritage to her eight children Image | Wikimedia Commons (Jennifer Jacquemart)

While all Spain is pending that their children learn English, in the Canary Islands they have another obsession: the German

The Canarian ties with Germany are strong. And they come from afar. They date back (at least) at the end of the 19th century And they have been reinforcing thanks to the Expats and the Huge weight which has the German market in the Canarian tourism sector, capital piece in the economy of the region. This link explains that in its classrooms it is studied more German than anywhere else in Spain and Parents committed in which their children learn at the same time the languages ​​of Cervantes and Goethe. It is the ‘Germanization’ of Canarian education. What happened? That Canary Islands show signs that little by little in a key area is being germanized: early childhood education. At least if we compare it with the rest of Spain. German influence on the archipelago (and more in zones With a strong foreign presence) it is nothing new, but there are indicators that help to better understand what extent they are pending in their classrooms and homes. The last one left it a few months ago The confidential in A report which shows how parents are betting on their children speak of Goethe’s tongue (almost) from the cradle or even cases of children who chapurre them before the Spanish. Are there figures to try it? Yes. Those of the Ministry of Education, which reflect how the teaching of German stands out in the archipelago against other regions of Spain. Although Canary Islands is one of the communities Less populated of the country is the one that has the most students studying German in the classrooms. At least in the 2020-2021 course They added 31,300considerably above the Community of Madrid (28,300), Catalonia (24,600), Andalusia (18,100) or Balearic Islands (13,800), two regions in which there is also a strong presence of tourists and Expats. And who studies it? That is the most interesting. The language is not only learned by young people who study ESO or university students. In the archipelago he has also penetrated among the youngest children. The 2020-2021 course there was almost 500 students Studying German in the Early Childhood Education stage, data that exceed only Catalonia and Andalusia, with much greater population. If we talk about Primary the figure, the largest registration in the country is triggered. In general the learning of German It is less extended than that of English or French, but still reaches a notable weight in the Canary classrooms. The region stands out For how extended the study of the second languages ​​is. What is the reason? There are several factors that explain that clear Germanization, but two stand out above the rest: the first are the Historical ties Between the Canary Islands and Germany, which date back to 19th century And they explain that there is a German school in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria and another in Santa Cruz de Tenerife. According to the Canarian Institute of Statistics (Istac), the Germans are one of the main foreign population groups in the region, although they are significantly below nationalities such as the Colombian, Venezuelan or English. The second factor is tourism. The sector has A crucial weight In the GDP of the region, where it generates thousands of millions of euros every year. And much of that flow of money comes out of German pockets, such as I recognized Recently the Canary Islands government itself, taking stock of the 2024 campaign. statistics From Exeltur they show that in 2024 the German was The second market International most relevant to the tourism sector of the region. Only the British is overcome. What supposes that in practice? That speaking German becomes a key tool, both in the Canary Islands (work or not in tourism) and when looking for a job in the rest of the country or the EU. “Everything that is science and engineering is very enhanced in German, but nothing happens if the girl later chooses to be a hairdresser and not continue studying. I try to give her best for her future,” Explain to The confidential A Canarian mother who pays 600 euros per month (activities included) so that her daughter is formed at the German school. “I know people who have studied in this school and thanks to that they work or live outside.” Is it important? There are those who believe it. “Learning this language here is a priority for two reasons. First because it gives you the possibility of leaving the islands to, for example, exercising as an engineer or sanitary in other places. It is also essential to work in the southern area of ​​the island (Gran Canaria), where tourism is concentrated and people are always needed to deal with Germans,” Marta García reflectshistorian of the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. “Here is key to accessing certain positions and ascending.” That influence explains that there are also adults who throw themselves to study the language to prosper, that the Canarian government has reinforced your bet For the linguistic immersion scholarships to study in Germany (and Ireland) or that there are even cases of children who begin to Chapurrean German before Spanish. Although it is not a generalized trend, a few months ago The confidential He reviewed A specific case, that of a four -year -old girl who entered the German school in Santa Cruz de Tenerife without speaking at all Spanish and surprised her parents by expressing themselves first in German. “I had a delay in language and I worried when I saw her speaking first German. I thought I was wrong and went to see the pediatrician, but luckily she started speaking Spanish last year.” Images | Norbert Braun (UNSPLASH), Guillaume Didelet (UNSPLASH) Via | The confidential In Xataka | For the first time in ten years, La Palma has shown the best creatures of its parties: the disturbing dwarfs that dance Polca

“Cancel Netflix for the health of their children”

Since Elon Musk bought X, His influence of influence Several integers have grown globally. To put it in context, the data suggests that X has about 415 million users, of which 227 million follow Elon Musk. That is, when Musk publishes a message on his social network he does it for an audience that actively listens. The last thing that He has asked To his followers: to cancel his subscriptions to Netflix as a boycott for an animation series in which his protagonist is a trans teenager. His followers have not doubted it and have canceled their subscription immediately. Netflix sin. The trigger for this boycott call has been the broadcast of the animated series “Dead End: Paranormal Park“, Based on the books of the British Hamish Steele. The series includes a transgender teenage character as the protagonist and is classified as suitable for over 7 years. Musk and a part of the users criticized the content to promote, according to them, a transgender agenda directed to the youth audience. Your message in X He quickly went viral: “Cancela Netflix for the health of your children”, which motivated thousands of users to share captures demonstrating how they discharged their accounts. After calling Elon Musk’s boycott came a wave of Messages on the same line of influencers related to the postulates of Trump and Maga. The series and the debate for the LGTBI+ representation. “Dead End: Paranormal Park” is a British series that mixes comedy, terror and fantasy. Its protagonist, Barney, is a young trans that, along with other neurodiverse characters, lives adventures in a haunted park. This series, recognized with international awards as British Animation Award and the Glaad Media Awardhas been placed in the center of the controversy for its representation of LGBTI+ characters in an area for children under 7 years, which has generated reactions among the most conservative users. However, the real origin of the entire controversy was not the content of the series, but the author of the books on which it is based: Hamish Steele. The author criticized that the British prime minister published a message of condolences for the Death of Charlie Kirkthe Republican influencer that was recently killed during a public event. His message ignited the wrath of the most conservative sector that began canceling his subscription to Netflix as a protest measure. Touch the image to access the original message Elon Musk’s answer To one of those messages in which it was indicated that the reason for the cancellation was that the author celebrated the murder of Kirk unleashed the cancellation chain. The controversy LGTBI+ He joined later In a perfect storm encouraged by Musk. Fall in Netflix actions. The financial impact of Musk boycott call Not waiting. On October 1, Netflix shares already fell by 2%, and repeated that fall the next day, accumulating a 4.4% decrease in 48 hours. Despite these figures, Netflix has not issued any official statement on the situation, nor has it clarified the real effect on its subscriber base these days. The personal history behind the controversy. Musk’s position on this subject has A family background. Xavier, one of the trillions he had with his first wife Justine Wilson, began to identify himself as a trans woman, becoming called Vivian Jenna Wilson and legally requesting get disconnected of the surname Musk. “I no longer live with my biological father or want to be linked to him in any way,” said Vivian before the press. The relationship between the two has deteriorated considerably since then, to the point that Musk published: “My son, Xavier, died. He was killed by the ‘Wake’ mentality virus. His daughter did not hesitate to respond to her father with A challenging message and in one recent interview for Teen voguethe young woman said: “I only find out about him by networks or for what the media publish. Sometimes I see what he says and think: ‘What a shame of others, I would have to say something’ and I have already done it several times.” In Xataka | Trans people do not have a life expectancy of less than 35 years, no matter how much the media say Image | Unspash (Thibult Penin), Flickr (Gage Skidmore)

How to configure it and what options are there to control what your children can do with artificial intelligence

Let’s explain How to configure parental control of Chatgpt to have control over what the minors of your home do with the artificial intelligence. You can also receive notifications when these minors perform certain tasks. We will explain step by step the process to configure the account of the minors to link it to yours. Then, we will briefly tell you how to configure these controls and the options you have. This moment option is only available on the web version Chatgpt, although soon it will also reach mobile and desktop apps. First configure parental control To configure parental control, you first have to open chatgpt using the account of who is going to manage the family. Once inside, Enter the chatgpt configuration Pressing in your profile image and choosing this option. Once inside the configuration, in the left column Go to the section of Parental controls. Here inside, click on the option of Add a family member That will appear. Now you have to Add the email of the minors account That you want to link your family, choosing that it is your son or daughter, and clicking on sending. You can also use a phone number if the account is registered with one. Although this is the simplest, you can also do it in reverse and send the invitation from the child account saying that the person sent to him is father, mother or guardians. Now, an invitation from OpenAi will arrive to the email account of the child or the child to join your family, and They will have to click on the link of the invitation and accept to join once chatgpt. When doing so, family members will appear in the parental control section. Now configure parental controls Once you have created the family, you have to go to the configuration of Parental controls in chatgpt settings. Once inside, click on the name of the minor whose permits you want to configure. This will take you to a panel where you can Activate or deactivate the following parameters: Reduces sensitive content: It will reduce the sensitive content of the answers. Improve the model for all: If deactivated, the child’s chats will stop sending chats to chatgpt servers Refer to stored memories: It allows to keep memories of what has been answered and asked before by the child. You can deactivate it. Voice mode: You can activate or deactivate using chatgpt voice mode. Image generation: You can allow or not allowing the child to create images with chatgpt. Hours of silence: You can configure the start and end of a period in which this child will not be able to use chatgpt with your account. In addition to this, on the parental control screen You can also configure a series of notifications related to the activity of the child. They can be chatgpt notifications or notifications and emails. It’s these: Answers: Receive notifications when ChatgPT will answer requests to the child who require a time to generate the answer, such as investigations or image creation. Safety notifications for adolescents: You can make you notify if the minor asks questions related to serious security issues. Tasks: You can receive notifications if you have modified tasks that have been created. In Xataka Basics | 14 Functions, tricks and ideas to squeeze the analysis of chatgpt images

that companies pay fortunes to their employees for having children

South Korea has been plunged into one of the worse demographic crises of the world, with a fertility rate that reached a historical minimum of 0.72 children per woman In 2023, one of the lowest in the world. This figure is far from the population replacement level, located in 2.1 children per womanand evidences a rapid population aging which complicates the country’s economic and social sustainability. This demographic emergency It has been defined by President Yoon Suk Yeol as a “national emergency” in the face of the risk of decreasing productivity and deteriorating the fiscal health of the State. According The published by Bloombergin the face of such demographic and economic challenge, the companies of the country have brought their shoulders offering generous “baby checks” to those employees who decide to have children. Decades fighting low birth. The South Korean government has been implementing decades The most varied policies to encourage birth, destined to Relieve the economic burden of families. These include direct children’s subsidies, housing aids, paid paternity permitsfacilities for access to child care and early education. However, despite these measures and mass investment in public initiatives, the birth rate in Korea has only achieved A very modest reboundwhich has led to the authorities to consider additional reforms and to promote the private sector participation In approaching the problem. Aminar to have children from your pocket. Given the growing concern about the impact that the population decrease will have on available labor, important South Korean business conglomerates decided to act on their own. According to published Bloombergcompanies such as Booyoung offer economic bonds of up to $ 72,000 (100 million wones) for each child born, and some even apply a custom retroactive effect to facilitate parenting. It is not the only one, The local press He ensures that other companies have also implemented bonus plans and additional benefits for those employees who expand their family. “I was spent. So, after Hong and his wife, who also works in Booyoung, processing the news, did what many would do if they were offered a fortune to expand the family: they had another son to get the bonus for their birth. This is the economy of Korea. The economic incentives that Korean companies are offering do not start from an altruistic or patriotic commitment. But companies have become aware of the serious demographic crisis and, Therefore workwhich must face in the coming years. South Korea looks in the mirror of other countries with serious demographic problems such as Japan and the image is that of a aged labor market in which labor shortage It has been generalized. It is estimated that by 2050, the population of 65 years or more will amount to 40%, potentially the largest proportion of any country in the world. On the other hand, the companies that offer these incentives have become those preferred by professionals who want to form a family, so they ensure the attraction and retention of better qualified professionals, who are going to prefer a company that offers Family conciliation benefits. An encouraging rebound in birth. Such and as he collected Reutersthe set of Stimulus measures implemented by the Government with the Private sector support begins to show its first effects with A slight increase In the birth rate. After almost a decade of constant falls, the fertility rate in South Korea rose to 0.75 children per woman in 2024, marking A change of trend descendant and marks a first significant advance in many years to reverse the historical. However, they warn that cultural and social transformation necessary to sustain more significant increases will take time. In Xataka | Japan believed to have touched back on his birth crisis. Now another question is asked: if there is really a background Image | Unspash (Laura Lee Moreau)

Mick Jagger refuses to leave a millionaire heritage to her eight children

Mick Jagger, the mythical leader of The Rolling Stoneshe has just completed 82 springs and has done so with the same energy he has exhibited every time he went up to the stage since the 60s. Unlike other public figures of advanced age, Jagger does not want to hear about withdrawing or organizing a Ostetosa inheritancebut to continue enjoying life and thinking about how his fortune can serve others. With an estimated wealth of more than 600 million dollars According to the medium Celebrity Net Worthit could be thought that their eight children already have the insured future. However, Jagger surprised to declare in An interview for The Wall Street Journal that has no intention of guaranteeing a luxury life without their own efforts. In their textual words: “The boys do not need 500 million dollars to live well. It is now.” The incombustible Jagger. Mick Jagger is the father of eight children fruit of several relationships. However, that does not prevent the millionaire artist from not contemplating to leave them all his fortune. According to the assets prepared by Celebrity Net WorthJagger’s heritage includes properties in London, New York, a villa on Moustique Island and a castle in the French region of Touraine. One of his last acquisitions was a house of 1.98 million dollars in Lakewood Ranch in Florida. In addition, due to its incombustible creativity, its fortune continues to grow thanks to its artistic activity, such as the 2023 launch of the Hackney Diamonds album. On its 2018 tour, The Rolling Stones won 117 million dollars. It doesn’t seem much compared to The Eras Tour From Taylor Swift, but his Majesty satanics got it with only 14 concerts. Gain his own fortune. The vocalist of the Stones is not the only millionaire artist who does not contemplate selling his musical catalog to leave his heirs a fortune, as he has done Bruce Springsteenwho sold his for 500 million dollars to Sony. Jagger believes that this financial movement is not necessary to ensure his future nor that of his descendants. As you share in the same interview: “Maybe doing something good in the world.” Other big names of international music have also expressed that leaving excessive fortunes to their children could do more bad than good. Sting, for example, said In an interview that their six children cannot depend on their money: “My children must work (…) people make assumptions. They believe they were born with a silver spoon in their mouths, but it is not so.” This current between artists and millionaires seems to have a clear motivation: prevent their children from growing without knowing the value of work and effort. Inherit less, donate more. This phenomenon “antiherences” millionaires not only occurs among artists. The heirs of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett They are very aware that, at best, only They will inherit A small percentage of their parents’ fortune. Buffett has made it very clear on numerous occasions. The last of them, at the last shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway, in which the “Oracle of Omaha” officially hung its investment notebook and He gave up leadership of your company. “I have never wanted to create a dynasty or pursue any plan that extended beyond the children. I know all three well and fully trust them,” said the veteran in reference to the ability to generate their own fortunes of their three children. Donate 99% of its heritage. Warren Buffett, like Bill Gates, follows the lessons they learned from Chuck Feeneya millionaire who made fortune thanks to the Dutty Free, but who died ruined because he had been donating all his fortune to philanthropic causes. That served Gates and Buffet as inspiration to create The Giving Pledgea philanthropic initiative with which the millionaires promised to donate 50% of their wealth. In fact, the commitment of its founders goes a little further and They have committed to donate 99% their fortune, leaving only 1% of their wealth For your heirs. Starting from fortunes of more than 145,300 and 117.4 billion dollars respectively, that 1% is still a good pinch for their heirs. Children and fortunes for all. However, not all millionaires share the philosophy of Gates or Jagger. One of the most peculiar cases is that of Pavel Durov, founder of Telegram, who has declared Recently that it has approximately 100 children, and that plans to distribute its fortune of 13,000 million dollars, ensuring that all their children “will have the same rights.” Durav represents a vision contrary to the majority current among ultra -ups: instead of reducing inheritance or channeling it towards philanthropic causes, he has expressed his explicit desire to ensure that all their children, known or not, can benefit financially from their success. A singular vision within the debate of The new heirs and its legacked billionaires. In Xataka | If the question is how much money you can donate to a child without declaring it to the Treasury, the law makes it clear: none Image | Flickr (Raph_ph)

“I don’t know if I want my children to see short videos and are not able to see something more than 15 minutes”

The arrival of the new short videos formats driven by platforms such as Tiktok or Instagram has dragged YouTube and other social networks to adopt the same content format Based on the infinity scroll. That change has generated a growing concern among the pioneers themselves in online video. Steve Chen, co -founder of YouTube, has shown his doubts as a father and user with respect to this format of short fast consumption videos that Pop for all attention of the user. “I think Tiktok is entertainment, but it’s pure entertainment,” Chen said. Use and throw content. Within the framework of A talk with students From the Stanford Graduate School of Business, the YouTube co -founder was not fully comfortable with the idea that their young children grow up watching videos of a few seconds. “I do not know if I want my children to see short format content as their only form of entertainment, and that they are not able to see something that lasts more than 15 minutes,” Chen, father of two children confessed, answering the questions of Stanford’s students. These statements show a growing concern among parents: children are digital native, but that does not guarantee that they develop skills or have the necessary tools for the responsible consumption of content served in Infinite Scroll Format demanding of constant attention. The child’s attention capacity. Chen also insisted on an argument that has become frequent among researchers: excess short content can alter the capacity to concentrate, especially among the youngestaccording to published by The Guardian. “The shortest format content is equivalent to lower attention capacity,” Chen said in his response. This type of highly visual videos were described by the engineer as a simple entertainment that does not necessarily provide educational or formative value, but with a high risk of affecting The attention capacity and to the cognitive development of the youngest when exposed to increasingly brief and addictive stimuli. Screen time control. One of the situations that most disturb Chen is the role of algorithms in foster digital addiction. As explained by the founder of YouTube, many platforms depend economically that users, including children, spend as long as possible connected. “It is a delicate balance between what attracts user attention and what generates more income, compared to what is really useful,” he warned. Faced with this risk, Chen openly suggested that technology should “consider limiting the daily use time of these applications, according to the age of users.” Extended concern. Steve Chen is not the only leader in the digital field that has ruled on the risks of the doomscrolling. Sam Altman, who premiered paternity in February, was also worried about The first podcast OpenAI for the impact of social networks In younger users. “I am worried about children in technology. I think that short videos inject dopamine; it seems that children’s brain development is deeply affecting,” said Openai’s founder. In that same idea, the social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, author of the Super Survents coincides ‘The anxious generation’ and professor at the University of New York, which in different interventions has warned sharply: “Social networks are seriously damaging children in the western world,” in statements collected by Business Insider. The expert has also warned that “the destruction of human care worldwide could be an even greater cost for humanity than the epidemic of mental health and health problems.” Try to put doors to the field. Steve Chen mentioned in his talk, that some parents try to prevent their children from watching short videos “with vibrant colors and addictive eyes”, preferring longer, although less exciting formats. The reason is clear: it is sought to prevent minors from developing an early dependence on fast and instant content, difficult to reverse as they grow. That is why parents expose them to content with a more resting rate. “If they are not exposed to the short format content immediately, then they maintain satisfaction with that other type of content they are watching (with longer videos),” said the co -founder. In Xataka | How to recover the concentration that social networks and multitars have taken us Image | Wikimedia Commons (Taiwán Plus), Unspash (Albert Oliveira)

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.