nightmare

Russia turned gliding bombs into Ukraine’s nightmare. 17 months later Ukraine is giving him his own medicine

by

Two years ago Russia launched a FAB-3000 pump of three tons over Kharkov and the shock wave was so powerful that several local seismic sensors recorded it as if it were a small earthquake. Until then, Ukraine barely had a way to respond to a weapon capable of striking from tens of kilometers away. The nightmare that changed the war. For much of 2023 and 2024, Russian gliding bombs became one of the most devastating weapons of the entire war. Moscow discovered that it could transform old Soviet bombs into long-range munitions simply by adding relatively cheap wings and guidance systems. The result It was devastating: huge FABs of 250, 500 or 1,000 kilos launched from dozens of kilometers away, out of the reach of many Ukrainian anti-aircraft defenses, capable of destroying fortified positions, bridges, logistics centers or entire neighborhoods. For Ukraine, this became a problem almost impossible to solve. Shooting down each bomb was extremely difficult, attacking the launching planes forced them to get too close to the front and each new Russian kit multiplied the pressure on cities like Kharkiv, Sumy or Zaporizhia. Seventeen months searching for an answer. The appearance now of the first gliding bomb Ukrainian marks something much more important than the presentation of new ammunition. It represents the moment in which kyiv believes it has found your own answer to one of the weapons that have done the most damage during the last two years. Development reportedly began in December 2024 and has required 17 months of work until reaching the final tests and the first official order from the Ministry of Defense. The weapon, named like Vyrivniuvach (“Equalizer”), uses a 250-kilogram warhead and has been designed specifically for the real conditions of the Ukrainian war. It is not simply a question of copying a Western or Soviet model: Ukrainian engineers tried to build an adapted pump to a scenario where planes fly at low altitude to avoid radars, where anti-aircraft defenses cover enormous areas and where each weapon must be cheap, quick to manufacture and easy to integrate. The importance of manufacturing at home. The great advantage of this bomb is not only military, but also industrial and strategic. Until now Ukraine depended on Western kits like the JDAM-ER American or French Hammer to convert conventional bombs into long-range guided weapons. The problem is that these systems arrive in limited quantities, depend on external political decisions and often include restrictions on where they can be used. kyiv had been trying for months to escape that dependence by building its own war industry. The Vyrivniuvach fits perfectly into that logic: according to its developers it costs approximately three times less than a JDAM-ER, can be prepared in less than half an hour and is designed to be integrated into already operational platforms such as the Su-24, MiG-29, Su-27 and even Western F-16 or Mirage 2000. A Russian UMPK gliding bomb attached to a Su-34 An increasingly cheaper and more massive war. The evolution of gliding bombs also reflects a profound change in modern warfare. For years, cruise missiles seemed like the ultimate symbol of precision strike. Ukraine and Russia have proven otherwise: It is often more efficient to adapt old weapons with relatively simple kits and mass produce them. Russia understood this earlier and converted its FABs with UMPK modules into a true constant attrition machinery against the Ukrainian defenses. Ukraine has ended up following the same path. The logic is brutally practical: a gliding bomb does not need complex engines, can be launched from great distances, costs much less than an advanced missile and forces the enemy to expend much more expensive anti-aircraft interceptors or accept the impact. The problem of attacking from outside enemy range. They counted the TWZ analysts that what made Russian bombs especially dangerous was the possibility of launching them outside the radius of many Ukrainian defenses. Russian planes could get relatively close to the front, release their ammunition, and return without directly entering areas covered by Patriot or NASAMS. Ukraine now wants exactly that same ability. Your new bomb is designed to hit targets located “tens of kilometers” behind Russian lines, including fortifications, command posts or logistics centers. This allows you to attack without constantly exposing the pilots to the densest air defenses on the front. Furthermore, as it is a national system, kyiv can use it against any target it deems necessary without depending on external authorizations or political limitations imposed by Western allies. Ukraine’s industrial war. The Vyrivniuvach It also symbolizes the extent to which Ukraine has ceased to be simply a country that receives Western weapons and has become a power. of improvised military innovation out of necessity. In just two years, kyiv has developed long-range kamikaze drones, unmanned naval systems, new munitions and electronic warfare solutions built at high speed and at low cost. The glider bomb is part of that same transformation. Ukraine understood that it could not win a long war by relying solely on limited foreign arsenals or deliveries subject to political debates in Washington or Brussels. That’s why the message behind this new weapon is so important: Russia turned gliding bombs into one of the biggest symbols of Ukrainian vulnerability, but seventeen months later Ukraine seems to have managed to hit back using exactly the same weapon. industrial and military logic. Image | Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Russian Ministry of Defense In Xataka | Satellite images reveal how much Russia fears Ukraine’s drones. 7,000 km away they are covering their nuclear missiles In Xataka | Once again, Ukraine has opened a missile launched by Russia. Once again, surprising manufacturers have been found

Toyota has created the city of the future and it is full of AI and cameras that protect you. It’s also a privacy nightmare

by

At the foot of Mount Fuji, Toyota he has been building a city for years entire designed from scratch to test their future inventions. It’s called Woven City, and it already has its first inhabitants. And although the city does not lack one bit of technology, living there also involves making certain concessions in terms of privacy. Below these lines we tell you all the details. Why does this exist? At CES 2020, then-Toyota CEO Akio Toyoda advertisement that the company was going to build a laboratory city on the land of a former factory in Susono, in the Japanese prefecture of Shizuoka. The idea was not to create just another corporate campus, but to build a real urban environment where engineers, researchers and residents would coexist and test advanced mobility, robotics, artificial intelligence and sustainability technologies. The project, developed under the subsidiary Woven by Toyota, has cost about 10 billion dollars, according to they count from Ars Technica, and its first inhabitants arrived just a few months ago. In detail. Woven City has, at the moment, about 100 hand-selected residents, who they internally call Weavers. They are Toyota employees and people chosen for their technological profile. They live in Japandi-style apartments (fusion between Nordic and Japanese) equipped with domestic robotics and health monitoring systems. The city is powered by rooftop solar panels and hydrogen fuel cells, and its streets are designed in three categories based on vehicle speed: expressways, personal mobility zones, and pedestrian-only areas. When completed, the total area will be about 294,000 square meters, although only about 10% of the planned space is operational right now. What is proven there. Residents act as beta testers for a diverse list of projects: from AI karaoke systems that choose songs based on mood to an air conditioning system capable of eliminating 95% of pollen from the environment, something relevant in a country where half of the population suffers from allergies. Delivery robots, tricycles or, as point the middle, the Guide Mobi, an autonomous vehicle that acts as a digital towboat to take cars out of the garage and take them to their owners without the driver having to move. According to they count From Ars Technica, 98% of residents have given permission for a robot with cameras to operate within their own homes. Here comes the problem. For all of this to work, Woven City is full of cameras. Many. According to the mediumyou could count up to eight cameras at a single intersection, and dozens more spread across the roofs of buildings, common spaces, and even the small cafeteria there. All that network of images feeds what Toyota calls the AI ​​Vision Engine, an artificial intelligence system designed to monitor, catalog and report on activity in the city. The system can identify people and follow them from camera to camera based on their clothing, without using facial recognition. They used it in a demo to detect potential thefts in a business. What Toyota says. The company says it has its own consent management system called Data Fabric, which allows residents to decide what data they share and what they don’t. “We allow Weavers to select what they want to share or not. Whether they don’t want to share anything or if they want to share everything is up to each individual,” explained John Absmeier, CTO of Woven City, told Ars Technica. The data, according to Toyota, is not sold to third parties. “At least for now,” they added in the media report. Between the lines. That 98% of the residents have accepted practically all the privacy conditions does not say as much about trust in Toyota as it does about the profile of the people who live there: they are selected technicians, who know perfectly well what they are agreeing to and who have come precisely to participate in the experiment. Kota Oishi, CEO of Woven City, recognized Japanese citizens, like Europeans, are especially sensitive to privacy and demand to know exactly what their data will be used for. The leap between this group of controlled volunteers and the implementation of similar technology in a real city with millions of ordinary people would be enormous, and questions about mass surveillance inevitable. The other big bet: a Own AI. While all this is happening on the streets, Toyota is working in parallel to not depend on the large technological giants in terms of artificial intelligence. Daisuke Toyoda, son of President Akio Toyoda and head of the Woven City project, counted on an interview in April to Automotive News that developing AI internally is key to protecting jobs and the company’s industrial knowledge. “If you only work with the biggest or best companies abroad, you run the risk of becoming a mere user,” he said. Toyota sees AI not as a tool to cut staff, but to digitize the knowledge of its best workers and raise the level of the rest. One of the most striking projects of this line is an AI clone of Akio Toyoda himself (even with his voice, his way of speaking and his philosophy) that is already used internally to train managers. And now what. Woven City is still in its infancy: only 10% built, 100 residents and many robots that “don’t do much yet,” according to counted the middle. The objective is reach 2,000 inhabitants when all phases are complete. Toyota does not expect it to be profitable in the short term; understands it as a long-term technological incubator to test its technology in more open, but controlled spaces. Cover image | toyota In Xataka | Chinese manufacturers no longer know what more innovations to incorporate into their cars, so they have added a toilet to one

Plastic is the great recycling nightmare. Car battery acid aspires to be the great nightmare of plastic

by

Have a problem with recycling. Thus, in general and even in countries that the more they try and complicate things. But, specifically, we have a problem with plastic recycling. It is a difficult and therefore expensive process, rather than producing new plastic, which leads to a scenario in which potential waste accumulates. To complicate things further, there are many types of plasticsand some are terribly difficult to recycle. But the University of Cambridge has had an idea: a solar reactor to destroy those difficult plastics. And the secret ingredient is car battery acid. The data. Before entering the ‘invention‘ from Cambridge, let’s go with some context. Recycling is not collecting, and vice versa. An example of this is Japan, a country in which there are areas in which there are 45 different categories of garbage that citizens must separate and where only 20% is recycled. In Spain, with an infinitely less obsessive systemwe are around 39%. And what is not recycled is burned in Japan and sent to landfills in Spain. Focusing on plastic and according to Cambridge researchers, the world produces 400 million tons per year and only 18% is recycled. And, as I say, there are plastics such as nylon or polyurethane that are particularly complex to recycle because their chemical structure is very resistant, which makes breaking them down complex and very expensive. plastic fulminator. This is where the discovery of the University of Cambridge comes into play. What they have developed is a solar-powered reactor that uses a very special ingredient: car battery acid. This component breaks the structural chains of the polymers into more basic chemical blocks and, therefore, easier to assimilate, such as ethylene glycol. Once the new material is obtained, a very special photocatalyst is what allows it to be converted into hydrogen and acetic acid, putting an end to that ‘rebellious’ plastic. By fluke. The team of researchers comments that the discovery was practically an accident since they knew that battery acid could be used for the process, but it was not convenient because, just as it melts plastics, it ‘eats’ the catalysts. Theirs, however, held out, and it turns out to be cheap and scalable. It is a photocatalyst composed of carbon nitride functionalized with cyanamide and integrated with molybdenum disulfide promoted with cobalt. Lots of text to say that it is a hybrid material specifically designed to remain stable in a strongly acidic environment. According to the team, it is economical and solves two problems at once: it dissolves difficult plastics and reuses battery acid that usually ends up as waste after extracting its lead content for resale. Future. In the tests, the team points out that the system has worked for more than 260 hours without losing performance and works with the aforementioned plastics, but also with that of the plastic bottles They are also not particularly easy to deal with. They claim that their discovery offers a potential cost reduction in recycling tasks because, in addition, reusable hydrogen is produced in the process. The key here is finding a way to collect the battery acid before it is neutralized for uninterrupted use to break down plastics. The team comments that they do not promise to solve the problem, but they demonstrate how waste can become a resource. new life. This approach approaches the problem from the angle of decomposition, but there are other proposals to give these plastics a second life. Because ‘melting’ them may be expensive, but if they are put into presses they can be turned directly into bricks or paving stones for the streets. This is what Nzambi Matee proposes, a Kenyan materials engineer who has proposed convert that waste into construction material. Like the University of Cambridge experiment, it addresses two problems at the same time: recycling and creating necessary non-polluting construction elements, and this idea is catching on because the authorities have given the green light to use this 2.0 brick to pave the streets of Nairobi. Returning to battery acid, the business arm of the University of Cambridge is looking to commercialize the company, but now the most complicated thing remains: making it a standard. Images | Cambridge University (Beverly Low) In Xataka | The big problem with nuclear energy has always been its waste. Russia can now recycle them up to five times

two decades later, his worst nightmare is underselling it

by

Just open anyone’s closet Millennial to find them, whether worn, scribbled or with the sole on the verge of collapse. The Converse Chuck Taylor All Star have been much more than a shoe: they were our—this editor includes—unconditional companion that survived all our aesthetic phasesfrom the fever skater in the style of Avril Lavigne until it becomes the essential everyday basic for going to the office. However, in recent years we have observed that this situation is no longer the case. Although fashion magazines try to convince us that they are back, we know that both the street and, now, the income statement tell a completely different story. The symbol of our “rebellious” youth is sinking. The financial free fall. The numbers don’t lie, and the market verdict is being relentless. According to a report by Bloombergthe Converse brand is currently in free fall, with its revenue heading dramatically toward its lowest level in 15 years. The magnitude of the disaster breaks down a financial drain: the brand has had three disastrous quarterswith consecutive drops in income of 27% in the first quarter, 30% in the second and a brutal collapse of 35% in the third quarter, remaining at a meager 264 million dollars due to the general weakness in all global territories. A huge contrast with its matrix. In October 2024, Elliott Hill took over as CEO of Nike and, from that moment on, the sports giant has shown signs of improvement, especially in the United States and in the wholesale market. However, Converse’s problems have intensified. In the November quarter, the Boston-based brand accounted for less than 3% of Nike’s $12.4 billion in total revenue, becoming the biggest drag on the company’s resurgence. But how could it happen? That is, how has such an iconic sneaker lost public favor in this way? (It is also true that the Millennials We are a bit egocentric. The answer lies in a mixture of immobility and lack of technical vision. Laurent Vasilescu, analyst at BNP Paribas cited by Bloombergis blunt about this: “Converse has lost ground over the years because it has not provided innovations. There was an excessive dependence on the Chuck Taylor model.” The brand rested on the laurels of its classic design. When they tried to modernize it—with the launch of the line chuck IIwhich incorporated Nike foam technology to make them more comfortable—the experiment turned out to be a resounding commercial failure. The market has changed drastically. As pointed out Seeking Alpha, Converse has come face to face with a consumer that now demands technical innovation, losing the battle to newer, performance-oriented brands such as On and Hoka. To this we must add the historical irony that Converse was not always a street shoe; In the 50s and 60s, it dominated more than 60% of the basketball market, shoeing legends and starring in the 80s. the iconic rivalry between Magic Johnson and Larry Bird with his Weapon model. Paradoxically, it was Nike itself that ended its hegemony on the fields by signing Michael Jordan. After losing its sporting throne, Converse was relegated to casual fashion, a terrain that is now also crumbling. Are we facing the end of an era? Faced with this crisis, Nike’s initial response in Oregon has been to take out the scissors. According to Bloombergthe company reduced Converse’s workforce, restructured its organization and took a severe 44% cut in marketing expenses during the fiscal second quarter. Despite this, Elliott Hill declared to Bloomberg TV in Milan: “I have heard the rumors (…) But we are committed to the Converse brand.” The rescue plan involves a desperate attempt to recover the lost glory on the trading floor. In fact, Converse has once again opted for professional basketballlaunching $130 sneakers in collaboration with Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, the reigning NBA MVP, in September. A little hope. So if the resuscitation attempt fails, it already exists a pretty clear option: Authentic Brands Group (ABG). This brand management giant, led by Jamie Salter, has a long history of buying struggling historic companies to squeeze sales through licensing and operating agreements. They already did it with Reebok (purchased from Adidas in 2022 for 2.5 billion, managing to increase their retail sales by 50%), and they also control Champion, Guess and Forever 21. According to BloombergABG has expressed a long-standing interest in acquiring Converse if Nike finally decides to hang up the “For Sale” sign. The reality of the street. There is a fascinating fracture between what the fashion industry dictates and what consumers actually buy. On the one hand, fashion headlines have been since last year announcing a “quiet return” of Converse, applauding like celebrities like Alexa Chung or Charli XCX wear the classics again high-tops in campaigns or fashion weeks. They speak of an abandonment of quiet luxury in favor of nostalgia. However, the overwhelming financial data of Bloomberg show that this supposed rebirth It’s an Instagram mirage. The generation millennialwhich massively adopted this shoe in 2008, has changed its priorities to an ergonomic model, support and comfort. The Converse look very good in the photos of street stylebut they are no longer profitable on a day-to-day basis. We have gotten older. Nike bought Converse in 2003 for $305 million, rescuing it from a painful bankruptcy filing. Today, more than two decades later, history threatens to repeat itself. Whether it achieves a sales miracle thanks to the NBA MVP or ends up being devoured by Authentic Brands Group’s mass licensing model, one thing is clear: Converse’s golden era is over. For the millennial generation, seeing their iconic sneaker fight for its survival is a relentless reminder of the passage of time. Converse will continue to exist, probably in the back of our closet or as a product of licensed nostalgia, but the incontestable symbol of our cultural dominance is fading forever. Image | PickPik Xataka | We went out for a 20-kilometer run with a bag of liquid cream in our backpack: now we have our own butter

The United Kingdom has found lithium under its feet, but extracting it is going to be a billion-dollar logistical nightmare

by

For vacationers visiting cornwallin the south-west of the United Kingdom, the landscape is a haven of peace dotted with historical remains. It is the land of the old tin and copper mines that inspired series like Poldarka region with more than 4,000 years of mining history. However, beneath this postcard scenario lies the most coveted resource of the 21st century. The then Prime Minister Boris Johnson baptized it in 2021 as the “Lithium Klondike”, in reference to the historic gold rush. Today, As detailed in an extensive report by Guardianthat “white gold” is the great hope for the British energy transition. The race for the first drop of lithium. The sector has recently reached milestones that seemed impossible a decade ago. On the one hand, as reported Financial TimesCornish Lithium company has just commissioned its first commercial demonstration plant in the region. This facility is designed to extract lithium from hard rock in former clay (kaolin) mines, a crucial step that demonstrates that large-scale domestic mining is technically feasible. Crushing stone is not the only way. In parallel, a fascinating technology has emerged that unites mining and renewable energy. It turns out that, several kilometers deep, the superheated water flowing through the fractures of the granite of cornwall It is loaded with dissolved lithium. As explained by BBCTaking advantage of this has enabled a historic milestone: the United Downs power plant, operated by Geothermal Engineering Ltd (GEL), has become the first in the country to generate electricity from the Earth’s heat, while producing the first domestic supply of lithium extracted from these underground fluids. The mechanics, as detailed Guardianis ingenious: the boiling brine is pumped (at about 200 °C), its heat is used to drive turbines that generate electricity, the lithium is chemically extracted and the cold water is returned to the subsoil. The initial figures for this project are modest—just 100 tons of lithium per year, enough for 1,400 electric cars—but the goal is to scale up to 18,000 tons per year. What does it really mean to unearth this treasure?? As emphasized Financial Timesthe primary motivation is geostrategic: the West desperately needs to reduce its dependence on China in the critical metals supply chain. Additionally, unlike wind or solar energy, geothermal brine provides renewable electricity “24 hours a day, 7 days a week”, shielding the network against the vagaries of gas. An abyss riddled with obstacles. But from the laboratory to the commercial mine there is a stretch full of barriers. First, drilling wells kilometers deep or building processing plants requires massive injections of capital. The GEL project has already cost 50 million pounds, inform BBC. Furthermore, the market is ruthless: recently, the Imerys British Lithium (IBL) side project, which promised to create the largest lithium hub in the country, has had to be halted due to “funding constraints and difficult market conditions.” The second major obstacle is the emotional shock with the population. A report from a few months ago in The Conversation perfectly illustrates this drama in the village of St Dennis. For Cornish Lithium to expand its open-pit mine at the former Trelavour quarry, it needs to demolish huge conical mountains of clay waste. The problem is that the locals have affectionately named them Flatty and Pointy. What for the mining company is debris that blocks lithium, for the people it is their heritage, their visual identity since the 19th century. It is the bitter dilemma of the green transition: sacrificing the local landscape to save the global climate. The Spanish mirror. This tension between national urgency and local rejection resonates strongly in Spain. As we have explained in Xatakathe European Union has launched a lifeline of 22,000 million euros to support 47 strategic mining projects and stop the bleeding of foreign dependence. Seven of them are on Spanish soil, with three standing out in Extremadura: the Aguablanca mine (the only nickel deposit in Europe, which reopens after a decade) and the tungsten mines of Las Navas and La Parrilla. However, the syndrome NIMBY (“Not In My Back Yard”) hits just as it does on British soil. The same publication recalls that the emblematic and controversial Cáceres lithium mine has been left out of European aid due to the fierce opposition of neighborhood and environmental platforms, a social pressure that has already managed to knock down similar projects in Ávila. The shadow of the dragon: the clock is ticking. While Europe deals with waste dumps and bureaucracy, China competes in another league. Fatih Birol, director of the International Energy Agency (IEA), warned to launch An operational mine takes an average of 17 years. The West is running against the clock, and Beijing is two decades ahead of us. And the data is suffocating. China processes 80% of the world’s lithium and 95% of graphite. For years, they sold batteries below production cost, taking losses to exterminate Western competition and establish silent dependence. Far from relaxing, the Asian giant keep devouring the subsoil: it has recently tripled its lithium reserves (going from 6% to 16.5% worldwide) thanks to new discoveries in its salt lakes. And the problem is not just “white gold.” The IEA alert that by 2035 there will be a 30% supply deficit in copper. Without copper for the cables, having batteries will be useless. The true cost of the transition. The UK’s mining awakening is the perfect microcosm of the challenge facing the West. We have discovered that we have the treasure under our feet, but geology is only the starting line. “White gold” requires colossal sacrifices. It requires risking billions in unstable markets, altering places that communities love and facing a very slow bureaucracy in the face of an implacable Asian rival. The batteries that will power the 21st century are not only going to cost us money; They will require profound social wear and tear. Lithium promises us the future, but unearthing it is going to be a real nightmare. Image | Cornish Lithium Xataka | China sold cheap batteries … Read more

The alleged PcComponentes hack affects 16 million customers. It’s another nightmare for phishing attacks

by

In Hackmanac Cybersecurity alerts reporting alleged hacks and massive data thefts around the world are frequent. One of the last notices, posted yesterdayaffects a Spanish company on the rise: PcComponentes. If confirmed, the alleged data theft would have affected a huge number of users. 16 million affected. According to these data, a cyber attacker using the alias ‘daghetiaw’ claimed to have managed to infiltrate PcComponentes. By doing so, it has obtained the data of 16.3 million customers, specifically: DNI/NIF Orders and invoices Address Contact details (phone) Credit card metadata (type, expiration date) IP address A sample that seems to confirm the hack. The author of the cyberattack wanted to demonstrate that the database he managed to obtain is legitimate, and to do so he has published a free extract of 500,000 users. That is already a very bad sign and seems to confirm that this hack and massive data theft has indeed been successful. There were already problems a year ago. An This failure exposed a database with access credentials. And everything fits. In The Computer Chapuzas They have contacted 0xBogart and obtained more information about that incident. This user actually talks about the fact that a database from August 2023 was already stolen and that then “it had 11,951,125 users, it makes sense that in 2026 they will have 16 million.” This expert had access to PcComponentes’ servers for five years, and only lost it “when they abandoned their data center for Amazon Web Services,” he indicates in the El Chapuzas Informático text. Pc Componentes has not confirmed the hack. At the moment those responsible for Pc Componentes have neither confirmed nor denied the massive data theft. At Xataka we are trying to contact the company to clarify the details. Meanwhile, those responsible have 72 hours from when the hack was discovered to notify the Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD). Up next: phishing attacks. This new massive data theft represents a potential nightmare for PcComponentes customers. If the hack is confirmed, all that data could be used for much more convincing phishing attacks: the more information cyber attackers have about us, the more they can “convince” us with messages that appear to be authentic and that manage to confuse us. Or phishing. There is also the danger of identity theft: the stolen data allows the creation of a “user profile” with which a cybercriminal can impersonate one person to deceive another with social engineering techniques. If the database has been leaked there is little that PcComponentes clients can do because their information will already be exposed. It has not been clear if there are passwords included for access to the company website in the massive data theft, but our recommendation is to change that access password as soon as possible. In Xataka | The leak of 16 billion passwords would be the largest in history. If it weren’t for the fact that it’s a gigantic rehash

The burial of the A-5 is one step closer to ceasing to be a nightmare

by

The tunnel works that aim to transform the Paseo de Extremadura into the Paseo Verde del Suroeste in Madrid continue their course, with their last objective achieved: that of connecting the two excavation sections. Little by little, progress gives us a glimpse of the end of a work that is marking the day to day of thousands of neighbors during the last year. And if not tell it to our colleague Javier Pastor, who has been suffering from constant interruptions network as a consequence. Advance. Last Friday, the gap between two tunnel excavation fronts was completed, an operation that consists of connecting two separately drilled galleries to provide continuity to the underground layout. Thanks to this technical procedure, 700 linear meters of the tunnel are linked. According to reported Madrid City Council, to date 1.9 kilometers of the 5.1 planned have been excavated in both directions and 81.7% of the covering slab has been placed. This same process will be repeated in the coming weeks in the rest of the sections until the infrastructure is completed. The deadlines. The delegate of Urban Planning, Environment and Mobility of the Madrid City Council, Borja Carabante, counted to El Mundo that “the tunnel hole will be completed in April.” According to Carabante, from that moment on, paving work, installation of extractors, emergency exits and other technical infrastructure requirements will remain pending. The opening of the subway to traffic is scheduled for the end of 2026, so the initial deadlines are maintained despite the meteorological and logistical complications of the last year. Surface improvements. Just like they count From Diario de Madrid, since last Thursday, traffic entering or leaving the M-30 tunnel along Avenida de Portugal once again circulates in a straight line along 500 meters of the A-5, between kilometer points 3+250 and 3+750. Having completed the work on the covering slabs around the Amusement Park, it has been possible to recover the original layout without the detour. In addition, according to the media, a connecting branch of about 60 meters is being built between Avenida de Portugal and the A-5 to prevent traffic from being diverted onto Calle de Dante. The dark side. A year after construction began, residents are still dealing with significant disruptions. According to collect El País, the problems range from the deafening noise of machinery to water and electricity outages, to the deterioration of air quality due to dust from drilling. The president of the Batán neighborhood association, Arturo Sáez, resume The situation is seen in the middle as a “perfect storm”: the closure of the underpasses in August forced the activation of traffic lights and circular buses, while traffic to the Amusement Park and the Zoo collapses the neighborhood on weekends. Added to this are recurring internet outages due to damage to the fiber optics, the last of which has affected Movistar and O2 customers in areas such as Aluche, Campamento and Pozuelo. The ultimate goal. The work aims to transform the Paseo de Extremadura into the Paseo Verde del Suroeste, a 3.2 kilometer pedestrian axis that will connect neighborhoods in the Latina district (Lucero, Aluche, Las Águilas) with Campamento and Casa de Campo, separated since 1968 by the A5, on which some 80,000 vehicles circulate daily. The idea is that the coverage will reduce surface traffic by 90%, promising to reduce polluting emissions. It will also incorporate a 3.5 kilometer bi-directional cycle path, 33 new pedestrian connections compared to the current 16 and wider sidewalks. The project, with an investment of 408 million euros, seeks to continue the pedestrianized boulevard from Avenida de Portugal to Avenida del Padre Piquer. What remains to be done. The most complex challenge of the summer will be to execute the connection with the Portugal Avenue tunnel, which will force new traffic cuts similar to those of the last summer period. Borja Carabante assured that “the most difficult thing has already happened,” but acknowledged that diverting services such as gas, water, telephone or electricity continues to be a complicated task due to the age of the plans. The work maintains its pace with more than 600 workers and 400 machines operating simultaneously. Cover image | Madrid Diary In Xataka | The deepest tunnel on the planet will join two points separated by 1,000 km: the margin of error is only five centimeters

Getting them out of there is an engineering nightmare.

by

The geopolitics of the 21st century has found its new epicenter (again) in a white wasteland of 2.2 million square kilometers. After the recent military operation in Venezuela which culminated in the capture of Nicolás Maduro, President Donald Trump has reactivated with unprecedented aggressiveness his most persistent ambition: to convert Greenland into American territory. But while the White House sells the island as a “bullion” of strategic resources, experts warn that the reality under the ice is an engineering nightmare that could break not only Washington’s coffers, but Western security architecture itself. The myth of immediate wealth. The central argument of the Trump administration is mineral wealth. The island is estimated to be home to between 36 and 42 million tonnes of rare earth oxides. However, as Anjana Ahuja relates in his column for the Financial Timesthe fascination with these minerals is not new. Already in the 19th century, mineralogist Karl Ludwig Giesecke cataloged treasures such as cryolite, the “white gold” of the industrial era. However, the technical reality is devastating. Anthony Marchese, president of Texas Mineral Resources, explains in Fortune that “if you go to Greenland for its minerals, you’re talking about billions of dollars and an extremely long time.” The problem is not scarcity, but physical accessibility since it does not have infrastructure that connects settlements, the electrical grid cannot support large-scale mining and, in the north of the island, the climate only allows work six months a year. The rest of the time, the machinery must hibernate under extreme conditions. The battle for the underground. Control of rare earths (neodymium, terbium, scandium) is vital for defense technology and the green transition. China controls today about 90% of this market, and the Tanbreez project in southern Greenland is emerging as the great Western alternative. According to industry sourcesthe company plans to start mining in 2027, but processing costs will exceed $1 billion. However, for experts like Javier Blas, energy analyst at Bloombergthis enthusiasm is, to a large extent, a powerpoint optimistic. Blas warns that Greenland’s potential is more part of a collective imagination than an economic reality. “The market has already spoken,” he maintains: if after decades of exploration no major mining company has managed to operate successfullyit is because the concentrations are low and logistics devours any benefit. According to Blas, the island is not a Wonderland of raw materials; It is an economic challenge that has not produced a single barrel of oil despite years of attempts. The China clamp. Here the most controversial factor comes into play: uranium. The Kvanefjeld deposit, one of the largest in the world, is at the center of international arbitration. The Energy Transition Minerals (ETM) company—owned by Chinese capital— claims 11.5 billion dollars to Greenland after the ban on uranium mining for environmental reasons. This legal dispute places the island in a strategic clamp: Washington wants control to expel Beijing, but it is already underground through litigation and business actions. The navigable Arctic. Beyond the mines, the decisive factor It’s climate change. Melting ice is transforming the Arctic into a viable trade corridor. Sailing from Europe to Asia through the north reduces the distance by 40% compared to the Suez Canal. Greenland is not just a reserve of precious stones; It is an unsinkable aircraft carrier at the center of new sea routes. Controlling the island allows the US to apply what some analysts at Fortune They call the “Donroe Doctrine” (a play on words between Trump and the Monroe Doctrine): securing the hemisphere as an exclusive sphere of influence, preempting Russian icebreakers and Chinese logistics investments. The “optical illusion” factor and the human cost. Despite Trump’s promises to “make” Greenlanders rich, local sentiment is one of rejection. Recent polls cited by the New York Timesput the population that opposes being part of the United States at 85%. Although Denmark’s desire for independence is real, Greenlanders do not want to “exchange one master for another.” Additionally, the maintenance cost is astronomical. Denmark subsidizes the island with 600-700 million dollars annually. According to the Financial Times, For the US to replicate the Danish welfare state on the island, the necessary investment would amount to hundreds of billions of dollars. Alexander Gray, a former member of the National Security Council, admits that “the accounts will never add up” but insists that the strategic value is “incalculable.” ANDbetween ambition and reality. The conflict over Greenland summarizes the transition towards a world where geography once again prevails over international law. For Donald Trump, the island is the ultimate trophy: territory, resources and a coup against the established order. For geologists and energy experts, it is a reminder that political will cannot melt ice or build ports where there is nothing. The Arctic is no longer a remote edge of the map, but the new center of gravity. But while the debate continues in the offices of Washington and Copenhagen, the 57,000 inhabitants of the island watch with suspicion as their home becomes the most coveted piece in a global chess game that is just beginning. Image | Pexels and freepik Xataka | If the question is “what is the next country on the US list” the answer has been on the table for months

Getting hold of Venezuela’s immense oil reserves seems like a “bargain.” It’s actually an engineering nightmare.

by

The geopolitical board has been blown up with the establishment of the “Donroe Doctrine.” According to energy analyst Javier Blasthis movement seeks to consolidate an energy empire from Alaska to Patagonia to control 40% of world production. Trump has not hesitated, making it clear that his objective is oil, recovering “stolen” assets and executing a lightning reconstruction led by American oil companies. However, Washington’s optimism clashes with technical reality. Analysts consulted by The Wall Street Journal They warn that there will not be an immediate miracle in the wells. In fact, the market has stopped fearing shortages and has begun to discount a future saturation of crude oil that is already pushing prices down. It’s not “black gold”, it’s asphalt. The narrative of easy success collides with geology. Venezuela It has 303,000 million barrels of proven reserves, but the vast majority is located in the Orinoco Belt and is extra-heavy crude oil. Unlike light oil, it is viscous, dense and does not flow naturally; It is more like tar than fuel. Added to the geological complexity is an alarming degradation of quality. A Reuters investigationbased on internal PDVSA documents, reveals that refiners in India (Reliance) and China (CNPC) have canceled orders or demanded drastic discounts because the crude oil arrives “dirty”, with excessive levels of water, salt and metals. These impurities corrode distillation towers and refining equipment, making processing an expensive and risky process. According to the researcher Luisa Palaciosthe country does not even produce the diluents (gasoline) necessary to transport this crude oil through pipelines, which forces it to depend on imports or inefficient mixtures. Low profitability. Despite the magnitude of the reserves, Venezuelan oil is far from being a profitable business. Its current low profitability is based on three critical pillars that any investor must consider. First of all, geology works against us. According to Forbesextracting this heavy crude oil requires massive and constant technical investment in steam injection and “upgrading” plants to transform the bitumen into a marketable product. Without this expensive technology, the resource is simply inaccessible. Added to this are the structural discounts in the market. As Al Jazeera explainsDue to its high density and sulfur content, this crude oil always trades below markers such as Brent or WTI. With a barrel that could fall to 50-60 dollars in 2026, the profit margin for Venezuela would be reduced to a minimum. The bottleneck: logistics. As an analysis in Bloomberg points outthe infrastructure is literally in ruins because loading a supertanker now requires five days, compared to just one day seven years ago. The collapse is such that the state oil company itself has gone so far as to dismantle oil pipelines to sell them for scrap, while key complexes such as Paraguaná are dying due to lack of maintenance. The rescue recipe. Venezuela dreams of the 4 million barrels per day that marked its rise in the 70s, but the financial reality is a bucket of cold water. Francisco Monaldi, director of energy policy at Rice University, calculates that the energy rescue demands 10 billion dollars a year for an entire decade. A goal as ambitious as it is expensive. However, money is not everything when human capital is lacking. CBCNews remember that In 2003, 23,000 skilled professionals were laid off, many of whom ended up in the Canadian tar sands. Without this talent, American cutting-edge technology has no hands to operate it. Furthermore, giants such as ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips will not move a single drill until legal certainty is guaranteed and settlements are made. billionaire debts of the expropriations of the Chávez era. But why Venezuela if Canada already exists? If crude oil is so “bad” and expensive, why Trump’s interest? The key is a necessary technical symbiosis. Gulf Coast refineries (Texas and Louisiana) They are like “stomachs” Designed for heavy food. Ironically, the oil that the US extracts through fracking is “too good” (too light). To optimize your plants and produce diesel, they need to mix its light crude oil with Venezuela’s heavy crude oil. Rory Johnston and Lino Carrillo they explain thatAlthough Canada’s crude oil is identical to Venezuelan crude, the latter has an unbeatable advantage: it is three days away by ship and has access to deep waters, while Canada suffers from “geographic confinement” due to saturated oil pipelines. Furthermore, by controlling this flow, the US cuts off the supply to “teapot” (independent refiners) of China, which until now bought Venezuelan crude at a discount, thus eliminating a competitive advantage for Beijing. There was a small pulse. Behind Trump’s mobilization, as the New York Times emphasizesChevron has positioned itself as a key player in the entire equation. This desire to go after Venezuelais also explained because it had a single major oil company that has maintained its presence in the country since 1923, surviving nationalizations and crises while competitors such as ExxonMobil left the board. There is a hidden treasure. Beyond oil, Venezuela is a “gas station” that wastes its own product. Luisa Palacios and The Kobeissi Letter The 200 billion cubic feet of natural gas stand out (the largest reserve in the region). Due to pure technical negligence, PDVSA today burns or vents an amount of gas equivalent to the consumption of all of Colombia, losing 1 billion dollars annually in smoke. Added to this is the potential of Mining Bow with critical minerals (nickel, coltan, bauxite) essential for the defense and technology industry. The paradox of the “gas station without hoses.” Trump has taken control of the largest reserve on the planet, but he has found himself with a facility that has no hoses, whose electrical grid is collapsing and whose fuel requires intensive processing so as not to destroy the engines. Although the flow of exports can be redirected quickly from China to the US in a matter of months—benefiting refineries in Texas and Louisiana—the actual reconstruction of the sector is a long-term project. The real battle has not been the capture of Maduro, but the management … Read more

Setting up a smart home is a nightmare. The solution is Huawei is to set it up for them

by

The promise of the smart home where everything works automatically without a problem sounded great, but the reality is that it is still a real chaos of incompatibilities and most annoying bugs. Even if we have all the devices from the same brand, there is still the part of assembling them, hiding cables… Huawei has the solution, although it doesn’t exactly come cheap. The complete pack They count in Panda Daily that Huawei has launched an offer of smart-home solutions that come in various packages with different devices and at various prices. The packages are designed to be installed in new construction homes and also for installation in already built homes. With these options, Huawei seeks to offer a comprehensive solution under the umbrella of your HarmonyOS system. In total they offer six packs, three for new construction homes and three for existing homes. The cheapest is the ‘starter pack’ for already built houses and costs 1,200 euros in exchange and includes the control hub and some essential functions such as lighting, air conditioning and curtain control. The most expensive packages are those installed in newly built homes. The most basic costs more than 3,500 euros in exchange and has WiFi 7 connectivity throughout the house, control of lights, curtains, air conditioning, smoke sensor for the kitchen and smart lock. The premium package goes up to almost 12,000 euros and adds features such as AI cameras, ambient lighting strips, and speakers throughout the house. All packs include installation and Huawei is committed to completing it in just 24 hours in the case of existing homes. The announcement is only for China, where Huawei had already launched similar solutions in the past. The chaos of home automation In Spain there are solutions provided by installation companies, but We do not find similar proposals through brands with smart-home devices such as Samsung or Xiaomi. Typically, we are the users who buy the devices and install them at home ourselves. Mounting cameras and lights is quite simple, but if we want deeper automation, for example controlling blinds or blinds, things get complicated and many times we have to go to an installer. Then there is the issue of compatibility. In my house I have two cameras, several lights, a robot vacuum cleaner and an automatic cat feeder. It’s not much, the problem is that each thing works with a different app and, although I can bring everything together in Google Home, the reality is that there are devices that it does not recognize, others that are deconfigured if the WiFi goes down and in general it is quite cumbersome. The standards like matter They promised to unify this chaos, but to this day it still hasn’t taken off. This same year they analyzed the topic in XDA Developerswhere they criticized that there are still many devices that do not support it and those that do sometimes lose functions compared to native integrations, as happens with Philips Hue. Returning to Huawei’s proposal, I don’t think the solution should be to buy a package worth several thousand euros and tie ourselves to a brand forever. However, the fact that it sounds like a much more convenient option than its alternatives It says a lot about the state of the connected home landscape. Image | Huawei In Xataka | Home automation and leaving for a month: Ana Boria has put all her efforts to the test just before the expected trip

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.