The tariffs have cut their wings before taking off

The luxury articles industry faces a difficult crossroads before the new tariff policies imposed by the US. Although Trump has given a small 90 -day respite To the world economy, the imposition of tariffs up to 20% To European productsis a hard blow to fashion brands, watchmaking and high -end accessories. The luxury sector not only face an inevitable increase in the price of their products, but also puts on the table the future of the labels “Made in Italy” or “Swiss Made” that some of the more expensive and exclusive products as a synonym for design and quality. The luxury industry against tariffs. Europe has been the epicenter of fashion and world luxury for decades. Great brands such as Louis Vuitton, Hermès, Cartier, Chanel, Rolex or Phillipe Pattek thrive thanks to a balance between artisanal tradition and global strategies. However, the scenario has changed dramatically after commercial war drums of the United States. It is estimated that tariffs between 10% and 20% for certain luxury articles manufactured in Europe and the United Kingdom could raise the final cost for the consumer in a market that represents 24% of the total world expenditure on luxury, according to data from data from Bain & Company. Switzerland does not move. The question is even more serious for the watch industry. US has imposed a 31% tariff to Switzerland That, we remember, it does not belong to the EU. At the moment, the Swiss Executive position is not taking reciprocal tariff measures as is doing the rest of Europe, despite Be outraged with a policy that they consider unfair to the Helvetic country. Outstanding brands such as Rolex, Patek Philippe or Tag Heuer are among the most exposed to these increases since their manufacture is made in form exclusive in their workshops in Switzerland and do not consider taking part of the production to the US. Despite this panorama, the Swiss watch industry It is optimistic. They ensure that their main audience, composed of buyers of high purchasing power, will continue paying high pricesand consider that, for them, an extra cost of 31% is a minor inconvenience. Migrar is not on the road map. Given this new context, it could be thought that European luxury brands should consider moving their production to the US, as the automobile industry is being raised, to avoid tariffs. However, no fashion brand and luxury products have expressed its intention to abandon its current production centers. “In each conversation that I have had with customers during the last five to ten days, not even one person talked about building a factory in the United States,” assuredto The New York Times William Susman, managing director of the Investment Bank Cascadia Capital. Signatures like Victorinox, emblematic manufacturer Multipurpose knifeThey have made it clear that artisanal quality is inseparable from their identity and that any change in the location of production would compromise its essence. “This Swiss icon is inextricably linked to the quality promise ‘Swiss Made’. We will remain firm in it,” He sentencedCarl Elsener Jr., Executive Director of Victorinox to New York Times. The only exception is the Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy (LVMH) group, Bernard Arnault’s holding company, which in addition to having American brands such as Tiffany & Co, It has several factories In California and Texas, that opened Donald Trump himself in his first term. However, that would only free him from the cost of tariffs, since when importing high quality skins and fabrics from Europe and other regions, they would also be affected by reciprocal tariffs. The aspirational client: the great loss for luxury. Such and As they pointed out from Reutersthe US market represents between 20% and 30% of the sales of large fashion groups, cosmetics and luxury accessories such as LVMH, Keing, Richemont or Hermès. That percentage not only supplies millionaires who can pay it comfortably. There is also an important percentage of aspirational customer that, perhaps, is willing to pay $ 2,000 for a bag, but will think about it if that same product costs $ 2,400. “A 20% tariff on European luxury goods could depress luxury sales in the United States, especially for companies such as Burberry and Kering that focus more on a wealthy aspirational clientele than on ultra -up clients,” said the analysts of the Morningstar consultant in statements to Reuters. Another door that closes. The commercial war initiated by the US arrives at a time when, like The luxury cars sectorthe high -end products industry sought to recover from the fall in sales experienced in the Chinese market in 2024. Now, to lower their sales expectations in the US represents a hard blow, especially when the main brands in the sector had already opened new stores in the US, such and as they highlight in Business of Fashion. According to sector analysts, brands should rise between 4% and 6% their prices to mitigate the increase in costs. TO Tenor of the published by Business of Fashion Citing Barclays sources, a negative impact of 1.5% for the Fashion Division and LVMH leather articles and 2.4% for Prada and Hermès is expected. The dependence of the aspirational client would leave more exposed to companies such as Keing (Gucci, Balenciaga, Yves Saint Laurent, etc.) could suffer a fall of 8.7%, while the Swiss watches manufacturer Richemont (Cartier, Piaget, Baume & Mercier, Vacheron Constantin, etc.) could experience a 7.1%drop. All this, when sector forecasts They gave a growth of up to 3% for this year. In Xataka | How Louis Vuitton makes money: of the unattainable luxury to mass luxury In Xataka | Hermés’ heir millionaire adopted his gardener. His fortune has evaporated before he reaches his garden Image | Flickr (Trump White House Archced)

China’s 125% tariffs are the entrance door to an even more drastic process: “decoupling”

The New Tariff war between Washington and Beijing It is creating the conditions for a total separation of the two largest economies in the world, something that just one year ago seemed unthinkable. What’s happening. Trump has suspended the highest tariffs for dozens of countries for 90 daysbut those applied to China has increased to 125%, marking a clear strategy: isolate Beijing. This rotation is not a decala. On the contrary, it is an attempt to form a common front against China, turning what seemed like a multilateral commercial conflict in a bilateral confrontation. In figures. The magnitude of this break is huge: 73% of the phones that the United States uses from China. 78% computers have Chinese origin. 87% of video game consoles. And 77% of toys. Between the lines. This crisis is not accidental, but calculated strategy. Trump first created a worldwide threat and then appeared as someone reasonable by offering a partial truce. For all except for China, on whom it maintains maximum pressure. “We can reach an agreement with our allies”, said The Treasury Secretary, Scott Besent. “They have been good military allies, although not so good in the economic. And then we can face China as a united block.” The background. 125% tariffs account for a practically impassable barrier for trade. It is not only protectionism, but total economic decoupling. The impact is immediate: Goldman Sachs has trimmed its growth forecast for China From 4.5% to 4% by 2025. Meanwhile, 19 billion dollars have vanished from world stock markets since February, according to Bloomberg. And now what. We go towards A world economy divided into blockssomething not seen from the collapse of the Soviet Union. Beijing has already suggested that he could devalue a Yuan already increasingly weak. And has warned its citizens against traveling or studying in the United States. Chinese authorities have made it clear that they will not be the first step to negotiate, while Trump says he is “waiting” for his call. The key moment. Trump’s strategy goes through a vision of zero sum: use the size of the US market as a lever and create conditions for other countries Choose side. Block. Island. “Trust has vanished,” says Da Wei, director of the International Security and Strategy Center at the Tsinghua University in Beijing. “In the balance between economic development and economic security, security will always be emphasized. This is a long -term change.” Global supply chains have been built for decades of a globalization now questioned. And also now face a change of roles whose consequences are impossible to anticipate with certainty. In Xataka | The EU moves token and approves its retaliation tariffs to the US: we already know when the counterattack will begin to be applied Outstanding image | Xataka

chartar 600 tons of iphone from India, according to Reuters

Two days ago The Times of India indicated that Apple had chartered iPhone full flights from India Towards the US. The goal was none other than mitigating the impact of the tariffs announced by Donald Trump, which were activated days later. Now It is Reuters who affirms the same And it gives some more data. For example, there were not five flights, but six. 600 tons of iPhone by plane. According to Reuters, Apple sources hired several Charter flights to send 600 tons of iPhone from India to the United States. Before doing so, it also increased the production of these smartphones to be able to send them urgently and thus be able to mitigate the tariffs of President Donald Trump. 1.5 million more phones in its inventory. Those 600 tons are equivalent according to Reuters to 1.5 million iPhone, an especially striking figure. According to Reuters “about six cargo planes with a capacity of 100 tons each have flown since March, and one of them did this week just when the tariffs were activated.” Manufacturing even Sundays. In Reuters they also indicate that Apple accelerated the iPhone production in India in 20%. To do this, he added workers and also extended the most important Foxconn factory operation in India so that there was no rest any day: the workers also worked on Sunday. Two “direct sources” confirmed that the Foxconn factory in Chennai is working on Sunday, which is normally a party. They are not so many. According to estimates Business of AppsApple sold 100.4 million iPhone in 2024 in the American continent. Our estimates according to Apple’s fiscal results place quarterly sales in the US in 2024 between 18 and 28 million. Although the iPhone is a product whose sales vary significantly according to the time, we can ignore that data and establish that every month average more than 8 million mobiles. Those 1.5 million are an undoubtedly striking figure, but they do not suppose so much for total Apple sales. Even so, they would have helped mitigate the impact of tariffs, which in the case of India is 26% although now They have been temporarily deactivated By the truce announced surprise by Trump a few hours ago. You can see the touch of cook. Yeah Tim cook is distinguished for something It is for its domain of the supply chain and its search for optimization (economic also) and efficiency in these processes. If what they indicate in Reuters is true, he was probably the one who made the decision to accelerate the production of iPhones in India and then send them in a hurry by plane to the US to get ahead of the tariffs. The strategy had been in preparation for months. A source from the government of India indicated how Apple really had been preparing the land for eight months so that its orders quickly passed through customs in Chennai. Even the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi asked those responsible for this area to support Apple with those shipments, they indicate in Reuters. Cook met with Modi in April 2023 with the aim of promoting the manufacture of its iPhone in this country. Image | Logistics+ In Xataka | The European car industry has a problem with US tariffs. Your solution is surprising: India

It has been too European Union

The European Commission presented This Wednesday a new action plan called “Continent AI”. The objective is to try to promote development and innovation in artificial intelligence in the European Union, something that the Law of AI precisely complicated. It is just one of the things they want to change for a simple reason: they have seen the wolf’s ears. A law of simplified AI. He Artificial Intelligence Regulationalso known as AI law, was criticized for being especially complex and restrictive. The European Commission has revealed that one of the objectives of the Action Plan will be to simplify that regulation. In addition, an assistance service will be launched to help companies meet it. AI factories. One of the points of that plan is to reinforce European infrastructure. In February There was already talk of the intention of creating Gigafactories of AI, and here the Investai initiative “will mobilize an investment of 20,000 million euros” with the idea of ​​”trulying the capacity of EU data centers in the next five to seven years.” More adoption. According to data from the European Commission, “only 13.5 % of EU companies” have incorporated AI technologies. Other of the key elements of the Action Plan is the creation of “high quality” data laboratories to take advantage to “expand AI solutions.” There will also be aid for the hiring of international talent and scholarships on Ia. Europe is staying out. The role of the EU in the field of artificial intelligence is very discreet. There are some remarkable startups (Freepik, Mistral), But the current strategy continues to prioritize regulation on innovation. The simplification of the AI ​​law can help European entrepreneurs be encouraged to work on their projects, and perhaps this also encourages an investment that of course in the US is extraordinary, as demonstrated by the recent openai case and SoftBank. And the US is no longer such an ally. The Recent tariffs of the Trump administration – and the European response– They have also made it clear that the United States has adopted a strongly protectionist position and in which its traditional allies are no longer so. That makes the European Union need to activate measures to try not to lose a train that has never taken at all. A lot of noise, few nuts. The press release shows good intentions and reasonable objectives, but does so with a tone and language too political. All are future and diffuse plans, and there are no specific and real measures that show any advance in this issue. For example, we do not know how or when the regulation will be simplified specifically. Nor do we know where those “AI factories” or when they will be ready to operate or what type of computing capacity will house will be created. We need European startups, not a European AI. Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity, already highlighted it in the interview that granted us In Xataka. What the European Union needs is not a model as Openeurollm, but “to finance local startups and that governments will try to encourage them by eliminating for example the blockages, creating companies and giving greater visibility.” And we also need to excite ourselves. Joaquín Cuenca, Freepik CEO and also He told us about this issuehighlighted how the EU needs to be “more optimistic and see how much we can get. All the legislation that has been created avoids the exciting part.” It is another palpable reality: in the EU we need exciting projects, and those will not come from the EU, but of European startups and companies. Image | World Economic Forum In Xataka | Of the minimum risk to unacceptable risk: thus defines the EU the four levels of AI systems in its new law

If you do not build its Arizona chips factories, you will face tariffs up to 100%

Donald Trump Does not take care of your effort with TSMC. During the electoral campaign the current US president said on several occasions that he was determined to make the decisions that were appropriate so that the country that now governs Recover the leadership of the semiconductor industry. Untilly entered the 80s of the last century, it had some of the most robust companies in this sector, such as Intel, Texas Instruments, IBM or Motorola, but little by little it was giving control of a market that Now it is in Asia’s hands. TSMC currently has a global fee of approximately 60% and manufactures avant -garde chips for many US companies, such as Apple, Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom or Qualcomm, among others. This Taiwanese company has factories in the US, such as the Phoenix (Arizona) plant that is about to start the large -scale production of Integrated 5 nm circuits In the N4 lithographic node, but a good part of the semiconductors that he gives to their American clients leave their Taiwan plants. Donald Trump wants to end this strategy. This statement He did it on January 27, a few days after returning to the White House and starting his second presidency: “In the very close future we will impose tariffs on foreign production of computer chips, semiconductors and pharmaceutical products to return the manufacture of these essential goods to the US (…) went to Taiwan; now we want you to return. We do not want to give them billions of dollars Biden. Tariff up to 100% to TSMC are still on the table The stir that has triggered The tariff strategy of the US government throughout the planet during the last week is not precedents. But in terms of integrated circuits in general, already TSMC in particular, Donald Trump has not modified his least. The statement you have made Just a few hours ago during an event of the National Republican Committee of Congress, it places TSMC again in the Center for Care despite the planning to build several more plants in Arizona in the medium term. “If they do not build their plant here they will pay a great tax. Maybe 25%. Or 50%. Or 75%. Or even 100%” “I did not give TSMC money. It is a great company. The most powerful in the world. The largest chips company on the planet (…) is spending 200,000 million dollars in Arizona by building one of the largest plants in the world. All that without money (USA). All I did was: ‘If they do not build their plant here they will pay a large tax. Maybe 25%. Or 50%. Or 75%. Or even 100%“, Donald Trump has argued. It is evident that the goal of having forced TSMC is being pointed out to settle in Phoenix with the purpose of producing avant -garde chips in the US in the US in the US already manufactured to those already manufactured in Taiwan. Trump does not strive in the least to take care of forms. His statements, that of January and yesterday, threatenly threaten TSMC. As I mentioned a few lines above, the first plant of this company in Phoenix is ​​about to manufacture large -scale chips, but its plan does not end here. The second factory will be operational in 2028 and will produce integrated circuits in N3 (3 Nm) and N2 (2 Nm) nodes. And finally, the third factory will not be listed at all until the end of this decade and will produce chips in the N2 (2 nm) node. In addition, the TSMC production infrastructure in Arizona will have two advanced chip encapsulated facilities and an R&D center. At the current situation it is unlikely that this company renounces this project. Image | TSMC More information | Reuters In Xataka | Intel’s plan in front of an unattainable TSMC: beat Samsung and consolidate as the second largest chips manufacturer

His fortune has disappeared before reaching Qatar

Nicolas Puech should be one of those people that most of the planet label as “fortunate.” The key is given by its second and unmistakable last name: Hermés. It is, about the role, the largest private shareholder of the luxury firm, and a few months ago it was the protagonist for its curious succession plan: adopt your gardener to make it legitimate heir. It happens that, overnight, His fortune evaporated for an alleged scam of its administrator. Qatar has just passed the same with Puech. The emir and a failed agreement. Nicolas Puechdirect descendant of the founder of HermesThierry Hermès, embodies one of the more complex mysteries and fascinating the European luxury universe. At 82, his figure ranges between opacity and scandal, wrapped in litigation, contradictions and unexpected movements that have questioned not only the magnitude of their fortune, but also their handling and the veracity of their heritage statements. Although a significant participation in Hermès is attributed to him, valued in approximately 5 % of the company (which would be equivalent to More than 15,000 million dollars), Puech has maintained contradictory speeches. While in a recent demand presented in a federal court in Washington DC, it is claimed that he acknowledged to possess that share package and signed his sale to the Royal Catar family, in other Swiss judicial instances he has argued that his actions disappeared in hands of a financial managergenerating a chain of uncertainties that surround its true level of control over the famous French fashion house. A fortune in question. The case that has put Puech back in the center of the international stage Lo Capital America begana company founded in February For the Viceemir de Catar in Washington and backed by Emir himself, Tamim Bin Hamad Al Thani. The company accuses Puech of having Failure a contract Signed on February 10, 2025, in which he promised to sell more than six million shares of Hermès. Documents included in The demand They show that the parties discussed the agreement for months and that the Catarí side provided direct financing guarantees from the throne. However, despite the formal closure of the deal, Puech twice delayed the transfer of the actions. In a letter sent on March 19, his lawyer claimed that, despite the “best and repeated efforts”, his client was “unable” to access his actions, and considered useless to establish a new closing date. The Catarí company now demands the courts that force Puech to fulfill the agreement or, alternately, compensate for it with 1.3 billion dollars for losses, opportunity costs and reputational damage. The past: a puzzle. As we said at the beginning, this is not the first time that Puech is involved in controversies related to its heritage. As We explainin 2024 he generated headlines after trying legally to his Moroccan gardener, a middle -aged and married man, to read half of his fortune, a decision that She was challenged by a charity foundation created by Puech himself, who hoped to inherit his heritage. To this is added its prolonged conflict with Your former financial managerwhom he accused in Switzerland and then in France of having stripped him of his participation in Hermès. However, a Swiss court rejected the fraud accusation, noting that Puech had voluntarily ceded the control of its assets to the administrator. With this breeding ground and background, added to its historic Rupture with the Hermès family (caused by his support for the tycoon Bernard Arnault in his failed attempt To take control of the company), they have made Puech an isolated, politically uncomfortable and legally unpredictable figure within the French business environment. Qatar and motivations. Had the New York Times This week that the Royal Catar family is no stranger to the world of international luxury, obvious. Through its sovereign fund and investment vehicles, it controls relevant participations in brands, hotels and prestigious stores such as Harrods and Printemps. The opportunity to acquire a 5 % participation In Hermès (one of the houses more profitable and exclusive of the sector, whose stock capitalization has grown more than 200 % in the last five years) was extremely attractive. According to Eric TalleyProfessor of Corporate Law at Columbia University, a participation of that magnitude would have an incalculable strategic value for any global luxury actor. Despite the risk of dealing with a character as enigmatic as Puech, the potential to access a piece of the heart of the French luxury industry exceeded any caution. Hence, the demand, in addition to trying to rescue the frustrated agreement, could also serve as legal tool to obtain rights on Puech assets in case they resurface in their assets or activate after their death. A legal maze. Beyond the signed contract and the financial interest, the great obstacle to the tasks seems to be the very existence of actions. If Puech really does not have access to them, the forced compliance with the contract becomes much more than a problem. However, if a judge determines that the agreement was valid and binding, the sentence could grant the Emirate A legal advantage In the long term, in the event that the titles reappear or are identifiable within the succession heritage of the heir. In parallel, Puech He has reactivated his legal offensive In France against its former manager, reiterating the accusations already ruled out by the Swiss judges. The process, now wrapped in a new veil of secrecy due to the confidentiality of demand in the United States, could be extended for years and keep blocked A capital portion whose real existence, ownership and location remain in doubt. We assume that sooner or later this story will have its reflection in the cinema: in the center, a lone octogenarian, whose fortune no one can confirm at all, and whose influence (although invisible) continues to generate global repercussions. Image | Pexels, The Presidential Press and Information Office In Xataka | Nicolas Puech: The Swiss millionaire who wants to leave a gardener with Spanish ties as the only … Read more

Boeing, in the line of fire of the tariff war. Airbus is emerging as the winner of the pulse between China and the USA

We are witnessing a Commercial War Unprecedented while we try, as far as possible, understand how far you can go. Trump administration maneuvers are being as drastic as unpredictable: in just one week, It has gone from imposing reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries —Without distinction between allies or competitors— to suspend them to open a negotiation period. That turn has given some oxygen to the global economy, qEU was already noticing the consequences. But the case of China is different. There is no truce there. Beijing has seen how levies to their exports to the United States shot. And in the midst of this new scenario, the question is inevitable: what sectors are in the line of fire? We have already talked about the technological, with Apple to the head. The company has begun to send thousands of iPhone from India to the United States to dodge part of the tariff impact. There are also indications that this situation could be translated In an increase in the price of the device in some markets. But there is another actor who enters the scene: Boeing. Despite the setbacks of recent years –marked especially by the accidents of 737 Max-, Boeing is still one of the United States industrial emblems. A heavyweight of the aerospace sector, whose airplanes are not only fundamental for global transport, but also a reflection of the technological and economic muscle of their country. Now, the trade war threatens to erode part of its competitiveness and could give An advantage to its great European rival: Airbus. To better understand the scenario, it is convenient to review, in general, some tariffs between the United States and China. We start with the measures applied by the White House since the return of Donald Trump. United States tariffs to China products The sum of the aforementioned tariffs gives us 145% to imports from China. It should be noted that, as with the European Union, other tariffs have also been imposed over time. Let’s see. China tariffs to United States products April 4, 2025: 34% of tariffs in response to the “reciprocal tariffs” of the United States to all American imported goods. April 8, 2025: 50% of tariffs in response to the increase in the “reciprocal tariffs” of the United States to all American imported goods. In this case, the sum of both tariffs results in 84% of tariffs that exist at this time. Tariffs will make the manufacture of airplanes As we have seen, tariff barriers are high on both sides of the board. If we focus on the aviation industry, the impact on supply chains It can be significant. Although most of Boeing’s production is concentrated in the United States, many of the components and materials they use come from suppliers distributed throughout the world. That’s where companies like Shandong Nanshan Aluminumthat supplies aluminum to aerospace firms such as Spirit Aerosystems. The latter, based in Wichita, produces fuselage sections for both Airbus and Boeing, including more than 70% of the structure of 737. In that context, tariffs can make aluminum more expensive from China. Although both Boeing and Airbus began to diversify their supply chain after the outbreak of the first tariff war during Trump’s initial mandate, A recent analysis of Leeham firm and Official Public Documentation suggest that Chinese aluminum is still present in the manufacture of some parts. That puts on the table the possibility of a price increase. Airbus’s case – a European manufacturer based in Blagnac, France – makes clear to what extent the supply chains are interconnected. Spirit Aerosystems not only works with Boeing, he also collaborates with his great European rival. And it is not the only example: Boeing also imports high -tech components made in Sheffield, United Kingdom. Airbus tactical advantage From the point of view of the supply chain, the manufacturer that depends most on raw materials or components affected by tariffs will be, logically, The most harmed. With the available data, it is not easy to determine which of the two large manufacturers is at a greater disadvantage, but if we take the case of aluminum as a reference, the advantage will be those who manage to import it at the best price and with the lowest tariff load. The scenario, however, is more complex than it seems. Changing supplier not only implies a logistic and operational reconfiguration, but also the global context is so volatile that it is difficult to make structural decisions. Not only China is subject to tariffs: dozens of countries are still reached by a base tax of 10%, although the White House has granted a 90 -day extension to the toughest tariffs. Where does Airbus’s supposed advantage come here? According to Reutersthe European manufacturer could benefit in the Chinese market by not being subject to 84% tariffs that affect US planes. Although China drives its own models, such as Comac C919it is still one of the largest aircraft buyers in the world. And both Airbus and Boeing have many deliveries committed. Chinese airlines could bow up by Airbus if their airplanes are cheaper than those of Boeing. Although the American manufacturer could try to absorb part of the impact by reducing margins, current tariffs – and the possibility of rising again – make that option hardly sustainable. Airbus, meanwhile, would face a challenge nothing less: increase its production capacity and comply with delivery deadlines. Images | FASYAH HALIM | Sven Piper | Lukas Souza In Xataka | The European Union reacts after the unexpected US turn: suspends its tariffs, although it keeps its finger in the trigger

Threat, panic … and an imminent exemption

When Trump, asking for calm before the chaos he created, speaks of decide “instinctively” which companies will be exempt from tariffshe is making a little conceal Apple. It is no accident that I use such a little precise term when Apple came from losing $ 700,000 million in stock market capitalization after the arrival of the new tariffs. Apple No Boeing, no Ford, not another American multinational. It is Apple that is in the center of the hurricane and which would be more devastated by the commercial war with China. Why Apple? The answer is in the figures and in political psychology. No other American company exemplifies better The globalization Trump says to fight. 90% of their iPhone are manufactured in China. Taiwan, South Korea, Vietnam and China themselves form a supplier fabric that would be impossible to replicate in the United States. No other American company would be so affected by the new tariffs Like Apple. A strict application of 125% to China with the current scenario would shoot the price of an iPhone 16 pro max, from the current $ 1,600 (more taxes) to $ 2,300. In addition, it is Apple’s unique position in the American imaginaryespecially important for a president as Trump. The iPhone is not just a product, it is a symbol of status and the window to the daily world for the middle of the country. It is another symbol of the world conquest from American soil, such as Coca-Cola, McDonald’s or Starbucks. An important increase in its Scottish price in your pocket for a good part of your electorate. Cook has played its cards well. Those who follow him for the values ​​he says may have their own opinion. Those who follow the compass of Apple’s action movement, hardly have something to reproach him here. He has received Trump in 2025 in a much more friendly way than in 2017, when he had to collect cable. It is not the only great CEO that has taken this step. And he has maintained a low profile, something complacent, weaving a personal relationship with him. The half billion dollars in the United States –What Trump has always mentioned that he has had occasion – he has given him the perfect coverage. It is a movement that We have already seen beforewith presidents of both signs: Apple announcing megainversions and great hiring plans that are actually not more than the natural continuation of their plans, but let each president appropriate that merit because it should have it on his side. The ultimate goal was always to achieve another exemption, Like 2018before the foreseeable tariff in China. We already anticipate it five months ago. The truth is that Trump needs Apple almost as much as Apple needs Trump. An inaccessible iPhone for the average American would mean a failure in its tariff policy. And a source of frustration for those who put their ballot in the urn. The becoming well looks like a choreography: Trump threatens with iron fist. Apple trembles publicly and fleta aircraft full of iPhone Made in India To cushion the impact. The next will be the exemption that both parties can sell as a victory. Trends to be shocked. AND The market already intuits this outcome. Yesterday Apple’s action shot 15% After the announcement of The 90 -day truce For all countries except China. Inverters do not seem to believe that Tim Apple You will pay the account in this war. Outstanding image | Xataka, Wikimedia Commons In Xataka | Tariffs have put Apple in the eye of the hurricane. The question is what will happen now with Samsung

suspends his tariffs, although he keeps his finger in the trigger

Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, has announced that the European Union now suspends its first retaliation measures against the United States. The decision comes just a few hours after Donald Trump will formalize a 90 -day pause in the new “reciprocal” tariffs that he had just activated. The crossing of decisions that we are seeing is part of a commercial war that already drags several chapters and whose unpredictability, despite the momentary respite, continues to take its toll. It does so in the markets and in a wide variety of industrieswhich analyze the millimeter every movement on a global board more uncertain than ever. Click to see the original message in x A firm posture. Von der Leyen has been clear: suspension is not a resignation. Brussels freeze the countermeasures for 90 days, but keeps up all the necessary steps to apply them if negotiations with the White House do not reach fruition. “All options are still on the table,” he insisted. The approved countermeasures. The European bloc had given green light A day before his own tariffs in direct response to the measures promoted by Washington. The proposal was strongly backed by the Member States, on the argument that American tariffs were “unjustified and harmful” for both economies. The plan contemplated applying 10% and 25% taxes to consumer products such as appliances, motorcycles, recreation vessels or even cards, in addition to food products such as sausages, poultry and other agricultural products. Personal care articles would also be included, such as dental thread. Not all tariffs enter pause. Trump’s pause affects only the so -called reciprocal tariffs, which had been set at 20% for the European case. However, other measures are still standing: 25% to imports to steel and aluminum from the European Union, and the same percentage for European cars. And even if there is pause, the EU is not beyond the reach of Washington: its exports will continue to face a base tariff of 10%, a minimum rate that applies to all countries affected by the reciprocal tariffs now suspended and that will remain in force for 90 days, except some other change of the Trump administration. The fight focuses on China. While gives air to its allies, the United States focuses more than ever in China. In less than a week, Import tariffs of Asian giant have climbed from 54% to 145%. China has responded along the same lines, With a rise in their own tariffs to 84%, and could climb even more. Uncertainty continues in the air. There are 90 days ahead and many open unknowns. It is possible that Europe finds a balance point with Washington, but on the scene what may happen with Beijing. To talk about China is to talk about the second largest economy and the “world factory.” Any tariff climbing with China is not limited to the two powers involved: its effects can move to the global supply chain and have a direct impact on strategic sectors such as electronics, automotive or the pharmaceutical industry. In such an interconnected economy, any prolonged tension can cause unwanted effects. Images | Pascal Bullan | European Parliament | The White House In Xataka | Apple and Trump’s dance is taking shape: threat, panic … and an imminent exemption In Xataka | There is a critical sector that is still expected the worst before the tariffs of the United States: that of medicines

12 years after making fun of Spacex and his idea of ​​landing rockets, Arianegroup is creating a European mini-falcon 9

Year 2013. An Arianespace manager gives his opinion on Spacex in a symposium in Singapore. His statements still resonate in the European space industry as a summary of the 10 or 20 years lost that now, Arianegroup and the European New Space They are trying recover. “They will wake up.” The question was: how Arianespace will compete, the French company that has been launching all the rockets of Europe for 40 years, with the launch of 15 million dollars that Spacex promises. This was what Richard Bowles repliedDirector of Arianespace in Southeast Asia: “They are progressing incredibly well, but what I see in the market is that Spacex seems to be selling mainly a dream. We should all dream, but the releases of 5 million or 15 million dollars are a dream. And personally I think that reuse is a dream.” “I feel that the question is how I am going to answer a dream. And my answer to answer a dream is’ do not wake up people, they have to wake up on their own.” “They are not superhombres, whatever they can do, we can do it too.” The awakening. Breaking a spear in favor of Bowles, very few would have opted for Spacex in 2013, much less a corporation with the European launch monopoly. By nature, large companies have risk aversion and cannot maneuver with the agility of a startup. However, time gave Elon Musk reason. In 2024, Arianespace launched three rockets: A Ariane 6, A Vega and a Vega-C. Spacex, meanwhile, launched 132 Falcon 9 and two Falcon Heavy. He also beat the reuse record with 26 launches and landings for the first stage of a Falcon 9. Themis project. Arianegroup began to maneuver in 2019 at the request of the French space agency CNES. ARIANEWORKSa collaboration between the two entities, announced the development of a multipurpose rocket of low cost and reusable, known as theomis project. The project received 33 million euros of initial financing. Although the first jump test (a vertical flight of low altitude) was scheduled for 2023, It has been delaying. Themis will merge with another rocket that has ended up being more promising. A rocket called Maia. In 2022, Arianegroup founded Maiaspace, a subsidiary that, this time, would work as a startup. His Maia rocket, competition of Miura 5 of Pld Space and the Spectrum by Isar Aerospacecan put up to 500 kg in Heliosíncrona orbit in its reusable version. Its first stage is essentially the lake that, of methane and liquid oxygen, with the ability to land in a barge in the ocean shortly after taking off from the Space Center of the French Guiana. Skyhopper project. While Maiaspace continues with the disposable version of his rocket (he already has a first client, Exotrails satellites), A newly announced project will develop the necessary modifications so that the first stage of Maia can land. He Skyhopper project It will focus that the propeller can recover, restore and reuse within 12 months since its launch. The first stage could be used again at least five times. CNES has awarded a contract of at least 20 million euros to Maiaspace to lead this advance. The first landing is planned for 2028. Image | Maiaspace In Xataka | “Elon Musk can monopolize everything,” says Arianespace, who has been launching all Europe’s satellites for 40 years

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.