Review with characteristics, price and specifications
The lovers of Compact phones We are in luck. First it was the OnePlus 13sand now the living X200 Fe lands, a phone that puts again on the table that can be almost All the good of a high premium range in a compact size. There are, however, some points to throw away from the ears. Not everything was going to be perfect. Be that as it may, after just over a week analyzing the living X200 Fe, I am clear that it is One of those phones that would use gladly in my day to day. And given my level of demand with high -end mobiles, this is not something that achieves any proposal. Vivo X200 Fe Technical Card I live X200FE Dimensions and weight 150.83 × 71.76 × 7.99 mm 186 g SCREEN 6.31 inches 1.5K resolution 5,000 nits peak shine 120 Hz Refresco Rate PWM Dimming of 2160 Hz PROCESSOR MEDATEK DIMENSITY 9300+ RAM 12 GB STORAGE 256 or 512 GB BATTERY 6,500MAH 90W fast charge Rear cameras 50 MP Main Chamber 50 MP Teleobjective 3x 8 mp ultra wide angle Front camera 50 MP Operating system Fontouch os 15 Android 15 Connectivity Dual Wifi Bluetooth 5.4 USB 2.0 PRICE 849 euros Design, screen and sound What a beautiful mobile. It is the first thing I thought when I took this alive in Blue Breeze color from its box. It is an impressive blue, to which the photos do not do justice. In addition, the finish is mate and does not collect just footprints. The sensation in hand is that of a very premium phone, and has nothing to envy to proposals that even exceed it in price. That a phone like more or less is subjective, but there has not been only one person during these days that he has not told me “how beautiful.” It is not something too common. The living X200 Fe is one of the most beautiful phones that have gone through our analysis table this 2025 It is a relatively compact phone, 15 cm high and quite light. I have been able to analyze enough living phones and, to date, this is by far The one that has convinced me in design. It is inevitable to comment that it is quite similar to an iPhone 16 in its songs, which combine the flat appearance with rounded corners. In my particular case, I think it is the right path. The only complaint I have is with the button. It is literally located as high as alive, something that I don’t finish understanding. In a small phone, the ergonomics is key, and despite not being excessively high, it has cost me comfortably to the volume buttons. Just looking at this phone in front, you know that the thing will go well. As I loved the design, I can say the same of its screen, one that reminded me of the OnePlus 13s. You have everything I can ask for: AMOLED technology 1.5K resolution 120 Hz of soda rate High peak shine (5,000 nits) A PWM Dimming Also High (2,160 Hz) It is a very good screenwhich does not lack brightness and with an excellent calibration. Without a doubt, the proof that we do not need almost seven -inch screens to obtain the best quality. The sound section has also been a surprise. Compact mobiles usually have important limitations in audio quality, but it is not the case of this living. The audio sounds strong, clear, and distortion is not especially annoying in the maximum range. In fact, it is a sound section higher than that of many 6.78 -inch mobiles. Performance, software and autonomy In the performance section I have to give a small pull of ears to this phone. And it has nothing to do with the fact that it gives badly or it works slowly, much less, it has to do with the message and ambition that mandates alive. This phone is clearly a flagship, it has no mid -range. Thus deserved a snapdragon 8 elite or a mediatek 9400, not a MEDATEK 9300+ presented more than a year ago. It is a good processor, the mobile flies, and I put my hand in the fire that if I put in the hands of any user this phone and another with the 8 elite, I would not notice practically anything. But, even so, when almost 1,000 euros have to bet on the best components, always. I live x200 faith Little f7 Realme GT 7 IPhone 16 Pro Max Realme GT7 Pro PROCESSOR MEDATEK DIMENSITY 9300+ Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 MEDATEK DIMENSITY 9400E Apple A18 Pro Snapdragon 8 Elite RAM 12 GB 12 GB 12 GB 8 GB 16 GB Geekbench 6 (single/multi) 2.112 / 6,650 2.028 / 6,271 2.239 / 7,209 3.106/7,799 3,150 / 9,664 3D Mark Wild Life Unlimited 12,334 16,889 18,231 16,809 24,987 3D Mark Wild Life Stress Unlimited 12.351 / 10.091 – 18.579 / 12,078 16,906/8,538 24,874 / 18,637 PCMARK WORK 13,485 15,181 12,806 – 25,431 The benchmarks make it clear where this chip is located. Your CPU is comparable to that of a Snapdragon 8s Gen 4but it is very far from proposals such as Snapdragon 8 Elite, Apple A18 Pro or even the Capada version of Dimensity 9400E, oriented to energy efficiency. Are they bad data? No. Does chicha miss for a mobile of this caliber? I dare to say yes. Finally, pointing out that the thermal dissipation exercise is quite improvable. South Andalusia does not help, but this is One of the few phones that has come to bother me markedly in my hand. Just record 4K for a long time or play intensively for the mobile. This is not problematic only by how it bothers use, but by oting a farther horizon in which heat causes component wear. Regarding software, I am happy with the Vivo Proposal. The living rom is cool, and I can say that of very few roms. It is … Read more